Gen Z researchers on work-life, scholarly communications and AI impact: a qualitative, aerial analysis

09 November 2026, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

This is the second update on the international 'Harbingers' project: Gen Z researchers’ work-life and scholarly communications. Our previous update (Nicholas et al, 2026a) provided a broad and general account, especially in respect of new methodologies for analysing qualitative data. This update, whilst yet a preliminary data analysis, provides more detailed observations and contrasts with the findings of other researchers. Interestingly, researchers in their twenties ('Gen Z') — postdocs, PhD students and ECRs — show attitudes and practices, that appear to differ from their millennial colleagues. The current phase is an exploratory nine-month study that continues our international and multi-disciplinary approach, covering 8 countries: China, Malaysia, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Russia, UK and US, and the sciences, social sciences and humanities. Our conversational, open-ended interviews gather data on work-life balance, scholarly communications and AI (artificial intelligence). Overall, we have interviewed 101 Gen Z researchers. The interviews, over an hour long, featured 50 questions, the resulting transcripts, to which we add interviewer commentary and prompts, amount to over half-million words. The use of AI (primarily Claude.ai) has been a central tool in the production of this broad overview. Indeed, it has proved more than a tool, our own developing experience in using it has provided perspective and insights to understand how these junior researchers view AI.

Keywords

scholarly communications
AI
Generation Z
early career researchers

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.