Spectral invariants and spectral calibration in the ZEBTS model: zeta-determinant, topological index, and mass gap

02 November 2026, Version 1
This content is an early or alternative research output and has not been peer-reviewed by Cambridge University Press at the time of posting.

Abstract

This paper presents the ZEBTS (Law of the Unity of the Triune Substance) framework as a unified spectral‑topological approach to fundamental physics, where key invariants are derived from the arithmetic properties of the Riemann xi‑function ξ(s)\xi(s)ξ(s). We establish a direct link between the spectral data of a specially constructed operator HχH_\chiHχ​ and the imaginary parts of the nontrivial zeros of ξ(s)\xi(s)ξ(s) via the Spectral Calibration Postulate (SP‑1). Within this setup, we rigorously demonstrate the equivalence of several conditions (SB ⇔ G4‑QF ⇔ TC‑Gap ⇔ HP‑Amp) that guarantee the existence of a spectral gap. This spectral gap is then identified with the physical Yang–Mills mass gap, yielding a parameter‑free determination of Δ\DeltaΔ. Furthermore, we show that the Atiyah–Patodi–Singer (APS) index becomes a computable arithmetic‑spectral quantity, expressed through a regularized trace tied to the logarithmic derivative of ξ(1/2+it)\xi(1/2+it)ξ(1/2+it). The model’s defining feature is the absence of free parameters: all fundamental quantities are fixed by the spectrum determined through SP‑1 and the known asymptotics of the zeros of ξ(s)\xi(s)ξ(s). The paper outlines numerical verification strategies, generalizations to other gauge groups and dimensions, and the relationship between the consistency of ZEBTS and the Riemann Hypothesis.

Keywords

Riemann Hypothesis
Yang–Mills mass gap
P≠NPP \neq NPP≠NP
adelic geometry
spectral theory
topological index
noncommutative geometry
thermo‑coherent regularization
quantum‑adelic geometry
operator algebra.

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting and Discussion Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.
Comment number 1, Anatolii Mukha: Nov 02, 2026, 11:17

Mukha, A. (2026). Spectral invariants and spectral calibration in the ZEBTS model: zeta-determinant, topological index, and mass gap. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23769530 Mukha, A. (2026). Discrete Gravitational Field in the ZEBTS Framework: Canonical Construction, Convergence, and Reproducible Examples. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23856148 Mukha, A. (2026). Unified Framework of Space, Time, Gravity and Quantum Phenomena in ZEBTS: A Topological and Spectral Construction via Flytron Dynamics. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23859028 Mukha, A. (2026). ZEBTS: From Flytron Networks to Quantum Physics. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23882642