Book contents
- The Cambridge Guide to Mixed Methods Research for Theatre and Performance Studies
- Reviews
- The Cambridge Guide to Mixed Methods Research for Theatre and Performance Studies
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction:
- Part IPlanning
- Part IIDoing
- Part IIIInterpreting
- Chapter 11Methodologies Dialogue:
- Chapter 12Non-linear Methodologies for Researching Early Modern Performance:
- Chapter 13Taking Your Time:
- Chapter 14Not Here for the Disciplines:
- Chapter 15Methodologies Dialogue:
- Conclusion:
- Index
- References
Chapter 11 - Methodologies Dialogue:
Archives and Embodiments
from Part III - Interpreting
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 February 2024
Book contents
- The Cambridge Guide to Mixed Methods Research for Theatre and Performance Studies
- Reviews
- The Cambridge Guide to Mixed Methods Research for Theatre and Performance Studies
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction:
- Part IPlanning
- Part IIDoing
- Part IIIInterpreting
- Chapter 11Methodologies Dialogue:
- Chapter 12Non-linear Methodologies for Researching Early Modern Performance:
- Chapter 13Taking Your Time:
- Chapter 14Not Here for the Disciplines:
- Chapter 15Methodologies Dialogue:
- Conclusion:
- Index
- References
Summary
In this conversation, Adrian Curtin, Prarthana Purkayastha, and meLê yamomo highlight how their research on sound and dance engages embodied knowledges and vice versa. They account for how archival work challenges presumptions about the research process as well as what the scholar assumes they are looking for in the archive. The research process demands flexibility because studying performance invites interpretation, adaptation, and cultural understanding as intermediaries in understanding archival materials. Each participant emphasizes how, for them, research processes have incorporated creative endeavours because of the embodied and artistic dimensions of performance and historiographic analysis.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Curtin, A. (2014). ‘Hearing Affectively: The Noise of Avant-Garde Performance’. In Curtin, A., Avant-Garde Theatre Sound: Staging Sonic Modernity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 177–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purkayastha, P. (2019). ‘Decolonising Human Exhibits: Dance, Re-Enactment and Historical Fiction’. South Asian Diaspora, 11(2), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
yamomo, m. (2019). ‘“Sometimes You Only Have to Listen…”: About the Sonic Entanglements of Our Colonial Past’. Interview by S. Donath. Textures, 10 December. Accessed 11 October 2023. www.textures-platform.com/?p=4975.Google Scholar
References
Albright, A. C. (2007). Traces of Light: Absence and Presence in the Work of Loïe Fuller. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Belting, H. (2005). ‘Image, Medium, Body: A New Approach to Iconology’. Critical Inquiry, 31(2), 302–19.Google Scholar
Blanco Borelli, M. (2016). She Is Cuba: A Genealogy of the Mulata Body. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakravorty, P. (2008). Bells of Change: Kathak Dance, Women and Modernity in India. London: Seagull Books.Google Scholar
Leavis, F. R. (1932). New Bearings in English Poetry: A Study of the Contemporary Situation. New York: G.W. Stewart.Google Scholar
Leppert, R. (1993). The Sight of Sound: Music, Representation and the History of the Body. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Purkayastha, P. (2014). Indian Modern Dance, Feminism and Transnationalism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Purkayastha, P. (2021). ‘Outing Pleasure and Indulgence: Indubala’s Scrapbook and the Red-Light Dances of Calcutta’. Contemporary Theatre Review, 31(1), 14–33.Google Scholar
Schweighauser, P. (2006). The Noises of American Literature, 1890–1985: Toward a History of Literary Acoustics. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
Small, C. (1998). Musicking: The Meanings of Performing and Listening. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Soneji, D. (2012). Unfinished Gestures: Devadāsīs, Memory, and Modernity in South India. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Spivak, G. C. (2010). ‘Can the Subaltern Speak?’ In Morris, R., ed., Can the Subaltern Speak? Reflections on the History of an Idea. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 21–78.Google Scholar
Srinivasan, A. (1985). ‘Reform and Revival: The Devadasi and Her Dance’. Economic and Political Weekly, 2 November, 1869–76.Google Scholar
Srinivasan, P. (2012). Sweating Saris: Indian Dance as Transnational Labor. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Thomaidis, K. (2021). ‘Training as Vocal Archaeology’. Theatre, Dance and Performance Training (blog), 12 April. Accessed 11 October 2023. http://theatredanceperformancetraining.org/2021/04/training-as-vocal-archaeology.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. K., & Beardsley, M. C. (1946). ‘The Intentional Fallacy’. The Sewanee Review, 54(3), 468–88.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. K., & Beardsley, M. C. (1949). ‘The Affective Fallacy’. The Sewanee Review, 57(1), 31–55.Google Scholar
yamomo, m. (2018). Sounding Modernities: Theatre and Music in Manila and the Asia Pacific, 1869–1946. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
yamomo, m., & Titus, B. (2021). ‘The Persistent Refrain of the Colonial Archival Logic / Colonial Entanglements and Sonic Transgressions’. World of Music, 10(1), 39–70.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.