Prior Knowledge Principle in Multimedia Learning

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511816819.022

21 - Prior Knowledge Principle in Multimedia Learning

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

Slava Kalyuga

Edited by

Richard Mayer

Show author details

Slava Kalyuga: Affiliation:
University of New South Wales
Richard Mayer: Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Abstract

This chapter summarizes research and theory concerned with the effects of learner prior knowledge on multimedia learning principles. In many situations, design principles that help low-knowledge learners may not help or even hinder high-knowledge learners. The main theoretical issue associated with the prior knowledge principle concerns the integration in working memory of instructional information with information held in long-term memory. The major implication for instructional design is the need to tailor instructional formats and procedures to changing levels of expertise. Essential future research directions include identifying instructional procedures that are optimal for different levels of expertise and developing viable instruments of cognitive diagnosis of schematic knowledge structures suitable for real-time online evaluation of learner progress.

What Is the Prior Knowledge Principle?

Design principles for multimedia learning environments depend on the prior knowledge of the learner: design principles that help low-knowledge learners may not help or even hinder high-knowledge learners. Many multimedia design recommendations do not explicitly refer to learner knowledge levels, although most of them have only been tested in experiments with learners who had limited experience in the relevant domain. Could the same recommendation be applied to more experienced learners? Experienced or high-knowledge learners are considered learners who have substantial previously acquired knowledge in a specific domain and who are involved in learning relatively new, more advanced information in this domain. The evidence suggests that multimedia design recommendations for such learners should be different, sometimes contrary to recommendations for novice learners.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning , pp. 325 - 338
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816819.022 [Opens in a new window]
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Carney, R. N., & Levin, J. R. (2002). Pictorial illustrations still improve students' learning from text. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 5–26CrossRef Google Scholar

Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorisation and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121–152CrossRef Google Scholar

Chi, M. T. H., & Glaser, R. (1985). Problem solving ability. In Sternberg, R. (Ed.), Human abilities: An information processing approach, (pp. 227–250). San Francisco: FreemanGoogle Scholar

Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (Eds.). (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar

Cooper, G., Tindall-Ford, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2001). Learning by imagining procedures and concepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7, 68–82Google Scholar

Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interaction. New York: Irvington PublishersGoogle Scholar

Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211–245CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ericsson, K. A., & Smith, J. (Eds.). (1991). Toward a general theory of expertise. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Hegarty, M., Quilici, J., Narayanan, N. H., Holmquist, S., & Moreno, R. (1999). Multimedia instruction: Lessons from evaluation of a theory-based design. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 8, 119–150Google Scholar

Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). Expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, 38, 23–31CrossRef Google Scholar

Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1998). Levels of expertise and instructional design. Human Factors, 40, 1–17CrossRef Google Scholar

Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2000). Incorporating learner experience into the design of multimedia instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 126–136CrossRef Google Scholar

Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2001). Learner experience and efficiency of instructional guidance. Educational Psychology, 21, 5–23CrossRef Google Scholar

Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., Tuovinen, J., & Sweller, J. (2001). When problem solving is superior to studying worked examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 579–588CrossRef Google Scholar

Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61, 179–211CrossRef Google Scholar

Levie, W., & Lentz, R. (1982). Effects of text illustrations: A review of research. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 30, 195–232Google Scholar

Lohman, D. F. (1986). Predicting mathemathanic effects in the teaching of higher-order thinking skills. Educational Psychologist, 21, 191–208CrossRef Google Scholar

Lowe, R. K. (1993). Constructing a mental representation from an abstract technical diagram. Learning and Instruction, 3, 157–179CrossRef Google Scholar

Mayer, R. E. (1989). Models for understanding. Review of Educational Research, 59, 43–64CrossRef Google Scholar

Mayer, R. E. (1993). Comprehension of graphics in texts: An overview. Learning and Instruction, 3, 239–245CrossRef Google Scholar

Mayer, R. E. (1999). Research-based principles for the design of instructional messages. The case of multimedia explanations. Document Design, 1, 7–20CrossRef Google Scholar

Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Mayer, R., & Chandler, P. (2001). When learning is just a click away: Does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages?Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 390–397CrossRef Google Scholar

Mayer, R., & Gallini, J. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words? Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 715–726CrossRef Google Scholar

Mayer, R. E., Steinhoff, K., Bower, G., & Mars, R. (1995). A generative theory of textbook design: Using annotated illustrations to foster meaningful learning of science text. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43, 31–43CrossRef Google Scholar

Mayer, R., Stiehl, C., & Greeno, J. (1975). Acquisition of understanding and skill in relation to subjects' preparation and meaningfulness of instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 331–350CrossRef Google Scholar

Ollerenshaw, A., Aidman, E., & Kidd, G. (1997). Is an illustration always worth ten thousand words? Effects of prior knowledge, learning style, and multimedia illustrations on text comprehension. International Journal of Instructional Media, 24, 227–238Google Scholar

Pollock, E., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2002). Assimilating complex information. Learning and Instruction, 12, 61–86CrossRef Google Scholar

Reimann, P., & Chi, M. T. H. (1989). Human expertise. In Gilhooly, K. J. (Ed.), Human and machine problem solving (pp. 161–191. New York: Plenum PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Renkl, A. (1997). Learning from worked-out examples: A study on individual differences. Cognitive Science, 21, 1–29CrossRef Google Scholar

Renkl, A., & Atkinson, R. (2003). Structuring the transition from example study to problem solving in cognitive skills acquisition: A cognitive load perspective. Educational Psychologist, 38, 15–22CrossRef Google Scholar

Renkl, A., Atkinson, R. K., & Maier, U. H. (2000). From studying examples to solving problems: Fading worked-out solution steps helps learning. In Gleitman, L. & Joshi, A. K. (Eds.), Proceeding of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 393–398). Mahwah, NJ: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar

Renkl, A., Atkinson, R., Maier, U., & Staley, R. (2002). From example study to problem solving: Smooth transitions help learning. Journal of Experimental Education, 70, 293–315CrossRef Google Scholar

Schnotz, W. (2002). Towards an integrated view of learning from text and visual displays. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 101–120CrossRef Google Scholar

Schnotz, W., Picard, E., & Hron, A. (1993). How do successful and unsuccessful learners use text and graphics?Learning and Instruction, 3, 181–199CrossRef Google Scholar

Snow, R., & Lohman, D. (1984). Toward a theory of cognitive aptitude for learning from instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 347–376CrossRef Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., & Frensch, P. A. (Eds.). (1991). Complex problem solving: Principles and mechanisms. Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar

Sweller, J. (2003). Evolution of human cognitive architecture. In Ross, B. (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 43 (pp. 215–266). San Diego: Academic PressGoogle Scholar

Tuovinen, J., & Sweller, J. (1999). A comparison of cognitive load associated with discovery learning and worked examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 334–341CrossRef Google Scholar

Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1990). Strategies for programming instruction in high school: Program completion vs. program generation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 6, 265–287CrossRef Google Scholar

Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Croock, M. B. M. (1992). Strategies for computer-based programming instruction: Program completion vs. program generation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 8, 365–394CrossRef Google Scholar

Merriënboer, J. J. G., Kirschner, P. A., & Kester, L. (2003). Taking the load off a learner's mind: Instructional design principles for complex learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 5–13CrossRef Google Scholar

Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1989). Automation and schema acquisition in learning elementary computer programming: Implications for the design of practice. Computers in Human Behavior, 6, 273–289CrossRef Google Scholar

Verdi, M. P., & Kulhavy, R. W. (2002). Learning with maps and texts: An overview. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 27–46CrossRef Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.