Models of Discourse in Systemic Functional Linguistics

doi:10.1017/9781316337936.013

11 - Models of Discourse in Systemic Functional Linguistics

from Part II - Discourse Analysis within SFL

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 May 2019

Edited by

Lise Fontaine and

Geoff Thompson: Affiliation:
University of Liverpool
Wendy L. Bowcher: Affiliation:
Sun Yat-Sen University, China
Lise Fontaine: Affiliation:
Cardiff University
David Schönthal: Affiliation:
Cardiff University

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Hasan says of SFL that 'for a theory that introduces itself as a semiotic one it is woefully neglectful of specifically sociolinguistic issues; its only substantial contribution is in the field of discourse analysis, where it offers a framework for the analysis of social context as well as for that of discourse'. This chapter sets out SFL’s general approach to text analysis and the relation of text to context and illustrates this analysis in practice with reference to several of the most influential models in SFL (Hasan’s Register Analysis; Gregory’s Phase; Martin’s Discourse Semantics; Mann, Thompson, and Matthiessen’s Rhetorical Structure Theory; and Matthiessen’s Appliable Discourse Analysis). Following from the description and illustration of the various approaches, the chapter then considers Hasan’s claim, above, in light of criticisms of the 'textualist' orientation in SFL from prominent discourse analysts in other disciplines (Blommaert, van Dijk, Widdowson). The chapter concludes by evaluating the extent to which the various SFL approaches presented interface with or integrate the social features of context in their descriptive and analytical capacity and by suggesting some ways in which these connections can be enhanced.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics , pp. 285 - 310
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316337936.013 [Opens in a new window]
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Andersen, T. H., Boeris, M., Maagerø, E., and Tønnessen, E. S.. 2015. Social Semiotics: Key Figures, New Directions. London: Routledge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bartlett, T. 2012. Hybrid Voices and Collaborative Change: Contextualising Positive Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203109373CrossRef Google Scholar

Bartlett, T. 2013. ‘I’ll Manage the Context’: Context, Environment and the Potential for Institutional Change. In Fontaine, L., Bartlett, T., and O’Grady, G., eds., Systemic Functional Linguistics: Exploring Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 342–64.Google Scholar

Bartlett, T. 2017. Context in Systemic Functional Linguistics: Towards Scalar Supervenience? In Bartlett, T. and O’Grady, G., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Routledge. 375–90.10.4324/9781315413891CrossRef Google Scholar

Bateman, J. A. 2008. Multimodality and Genre: A Foundation for the Systematic Analysis of Multimodal Documents. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bednarek, M. and Martin, J. R.. 2010. New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Berry, M. 1981a. Systemic Linguistics and Discourse Analysis: A Multi-layered Approach to Exchange Structure. In Coulthard, M. and Montgomery, M., eds., Studies in Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge. 120–45.Google Scholar

Berry, M. 1981b. Towards Layers of Exchange Structure for Directive Exchanges. Network 2: 23–32.Google Scholar

Berry, M. 2016. Dynamism in Exchange Structure. English Text Construction 9(1): 33–55.CrossRef Google Scholar

Butt, D. G., Moore, A. R., Henderson-Brooks, C., Meares, R., and Haliburn, J.. 2007. Dissociation, Relatedness and ‘Cohesive Harmony’: A Linguistic Measure of Degrees of ‘Fragmentation’? Linguistics and the Human Sciences 3(3): 263–93.Google Scholar

Cloran, C. 1994. Rhetorical Units and Decontextualisation: An Enquiry into Some Relations of Context, Meaning and Grammar. Monographs in Systemic Linguistics 6. Nottingham: University of Nottingham.Google Scholar

Cloran, C. 2010. Rhetorical Unit Analysis and Bakhtin’s Chronotope. Functions of Language 17(1): 29–70.10.1075/fol.17.1.02cloCrossRef Google Scholar

Eggins, S. and Slade, D.. 1997. Analysing Casual Conversation. London: Cassell.Google Scholar

Gregory, M. 1995. Generic Expectancies and Discoursal Surprises: John Donne’s The Good Morrow. In Fries, P. H. and Gregory, M., eds., Discourse in Society: Systemic Functional Perspectives. Meaning and Choice in Language: Studies for Michael Halliday. London: Ablex. 67–84.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. 1964. Descriptive Linguistics in Literary Studies. In Duthie, A., ed., English Studies Today: Third Series. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 23–9.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. 1975. Learning How to Mean: Explorations in the Development of Language. London: Edward Arnold.CrossRef Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R.. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R.. 1989. Language, Context and Text. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hasan, R. 1984. Coherence and Cohesive Harmony. In Flood, J., ed., Understanding Reading Comprehension: Cognition, Language and the Structure of Prose. Newark: International Reading Association. 181–219.Google Scholar

Hasan, R. 1989. Semantic Variation and Sociolinguistics. Australian Journal of Linguistics 9: 221–75.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hasan, R. 1995. The Conception of Context in Text. In Fries, P. and Gregory, M., eds., Discourse in Society: Systemic Functional Perspectives. Meaning and Choice in Language: Studies for Michael Halliday. London: Ablex. 183–284.Google Scholar

Hasan, R. 1996. The Nursery Tale as Genre. In Cloran, C., Butt, D., and Williams, G., eds., Ways of Saying: Ways of Meaning. London: Cassell. 51–72.Google Scholar

Hasan, R. 2009. Wanted: A Theory for Integrated Sociolinguistics. In Webster, J. J., ed., Collected Works of Ruqaiya Hasan,Volume 2: Semantic Variation: Meaning in Society and in Sociolinguistics. Sheffield: Equinox. 5–40.Google Scholar

Hasan, R. 2014. Towards a Paradigmatic Description of Context: Systems, Metafunctions and Semantics. Functional Linguistics 1(9): 1–54.10.1186/s40554-014-0009-yCrossRef Google Scholar

Hasan, R. 2016. Collected Works of Ruqaiya Hasan, Volume 2: Context in the System and Process of Language. Edited by Webster, J. J.. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar

Hasan, R. and Fries, P.. 1995. Reflections on Subject and Theme: An Introduction. In Hasan, R. and Fries, P., eds., On Subject and Theme: A Discourse Functional Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. xiii–xlv.10.1075/cilt.118CrossRef Google Scholar

Hasan, R., Cloran, C., Williams, G., and Lukin, A.. 2007. Semantic Networks: The Description of Linguistic Meaning in SFL. In Hasan, R., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., and Webster, J. J., eds., Continuing Discourse on Language: A Functional Perspective, Volume 2. Sheffield: Equinox. 697–738.Google Scholar

Lukin, A. 2012. Meanings in Questions: A Case Study of the ABC’s Current Affairs Coverage of the 2003 Invasion of Iraq. In Bartlett, T. and Chen, H., eds., Special Issue of Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice 9(1): 424–44.Google Scholar

Lukin, A. 2015. Language and Society, Context and Text: The Contributions of Ruqaiya Hasan. In Bowcher, W. and Liang, J. Y., eds., Essays in Honour of Ruqaiya Hasan: Society in Language, Language in Society. London: Palgrave. 143–65.Google Scholar

Lukin, A., Moore, A. R., Herke, M., Wegener, R., and Wu, C.. 2011. Halliday’s Model of Register Revisited and Explored. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 4(2): 187–213.10.1558/lhs.v4i2.187CrossRef Google Scholar

Mann, W. C. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.. 1991. Functions of Language in Two Frameworks. Word 42(3): 231–49.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mann, W. C. and Thompson, S. A.. 1988. Rhetorical Structure Theory: Towards a Functional Theory of Text Organisation. Text (8)3: 243–81.Google Scholar

Mann, W. C., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., and Thompson, S. A.. 1992. Rhetorical Structure Theory and Text Analysis. In Mann, W. C. and Thompson, S. A., eds., Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-raising Text. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 39–78.10.1075/pbns.16.04manCrossRef Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. 1992. English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRef Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. 1999. Modelling Context: A Crooked Path of Progress in Contextual Linguistics. In Ghadessy, M., ed., Text and Context in Functional Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 25–61.10.1075/cilt.169.05marCrossRef Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. 2010. Semantic Variation: Modelling Realisation, Instantiation and Individuation in Social Semiosis. In Bednarek, M. and Martin, J. R., eds., New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity and Affiliation. London: Continuum. 1–34.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. and Rose, D.. 2003. Working with Discourse: Meaning beyond the Clause. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. and Rose, D.. 2007. Working with Discourse: Meaning beyond the Clause. 2nd ed. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. and Rose, D.. 2008. Genre Relations: Mapping Culture. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. and White, P. R. R.. 2005. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230511910CrossRef Google Scholar

Maton, K. 2014. Knowledge and Knowers: Towards a Realist Sociology of Education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. 2014. Appliable Discourse Analysis. In Yan, F. and Webster, J. J., eds., Developing Systemic Functional Linguistics: Theory and Application. Sheffield: Equinox. 138–208.Google Scholar

Moore, A. R. 2017. Register Analysis in Systemic Functional Linguistics. In Bartlett, T. and O’Grady, G., eds., 2017. The Routledge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Routledge. 418–37.Google Scholar

Scott, C. 2010. Peace and Cohesive Harmony: A Diachronic Investigation of Structure and Texture in ‘End of War’ News Reports in The Sydney Morning Herald. In Yan, F. and Wu, C., eds., Challenges to Systemic Functional Linguistics: Theory and Practice. Proceedings of the 36th ISFC. Beijing: ISFC Organising Committee. 89–96.Google Scholar

Sinclair, J. and Coulthard, R. M.. 1975. Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. The Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Edited by Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S., and Souberman, E.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Webster, J. J., Chan, J., Yan, V., and Wong, K.. 2013. Visualizing the Architecture and Texture of a Text: A Case Study of Selected Speeches of US President Barack Obama. In Shi, F. and Peng, G., eds., Festschrift in Honour of Prof. William S-Y. Wang’s 80th birthday. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press. 301–24.Google Scholar

Widdowson, H. G. 2007. Text, Context, Pretext: Critical Issues in Discourse Analysis. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.