Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T15:14:22.185Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Datapath sequential logic

from Part IV - Synchronous sequential logic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2019

William J. Dally
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
R. Curtis Harting
Affiliation:
Google Inc., New York
Tor M. Aamodt
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Vancouver
Get access

Summary

In Chapter 14 we saw how a finite-state machine can be synthesized from a state diagram by writing down a table for the next-state function and synthesizing the logic that realizes this table. For many sequential functions, however, the next-state function can be more simply described by an expression rather than by a table. Such functions are more efficiently described and realized as datapaths, where the next state is computed as a logical function, often involving arithmetic circuits, multiplexers, and other building block circuits.

COUNTERS

A simpler counter

Suppose you want to build a finite-state machine with the state diagram shown in Figure 16.1. This circuit is forced to state 0 whenever input r is true. Whenever input r is false, the machine counts through the states from 0 to 31 and then cycles back to 0. Because of this counting behavior, we refer to this finite-state machine as a counter.

We could design the counter employing the methodology developed in Chapter 14. A VHDL description taking this approach for a three-bit counter (eight states) is shown in Figure 16.2. A three-bit wide bank of flip-flops holds the current state, count, and updates it from the next state, nxt, on each rising edge of the clock. The matching case statement captures the state table, specifying the next state for each input and current state combination.

While this method for generating counters works, it is verbose and inefficient. The lines of the state table are repetitive. The behavior of the machine can be captured entirely by the single line

nxt ≤ (others => ’0’) when rst else count+1;

We use array aggregate notation, “(others => ’0’)”, to specify a std_logic_vector value with all elements equal to ’0’. This is a datapath description of the finite-state machine in which we specify the next state as a function of the current state and inputs.

Information

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×