Autonomy-Supportive Interventions

Behavior change interventions based on self-determination theory focus on promoting autonomous motivation, using autonomy support to do so. This chapter outlines the autonomy-supportive intervention program (ASIP), which helps supervisors “upgrade” the quality of their motivating style toward those they supervise, as occurs in the classroom, workplace, home, sport arenas, and health care settings. This is an important approach to behavior change because, when supervisors become more autonomy-supportive and less controlling, those they supervise tend to increase their adaptive behaviors (e.g., learning, prosocial behavior) and well-being as well as to decrease their maladaptive behaviors (e.g., disengagement, antisocial behavior) and ill-being. This chapter defines the key constructs and practices featured in the ASIP (i.e., supervisor’s motivating styles, supervisee’s psychological needs); identifies the theoretical basis and the specific mechanisms by which this intervention enables behavior change; provides an overview of what occurs during an ASIP; outlines the evidence base supporting the efficacy and benefits of the intervention; and offers step-by-step guidelines for how practitioners might carry out an ASIP in different contexts and populations.

Keywords

autonomy support training program motivating style autonomy-supportive motivating style controlling motivating style need support need satisfaction need frustration dual-process model

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: The Handbook of Behavior Change , pp. 510 - 522
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108677318.035 [Opens in a new window]
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Soenens, B. et al. (2019). Toward a fine-grained understanding of the components of need-supportive and need-thwarting teaching: The merits of a gradual approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111, 497–521. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000293 CrossRef Google Scholar

Assor, A., Kaplan, H., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Roth, G. (2005). Directly controlling teacher behaviors as predictors of poor motivation and engagement in girls and boys: The role of anger and anxiety. Learning and Instruction, 15, 397–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.008 CrossRef Google Scholar

Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teaching behaviors predicting students’ engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 27, 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709902158883 CrossRef Google Scholar

Bartholomew, K. J., Ntoumanis, N., Ryan, R., Bosch, J. A., & Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C. (2011). Self-determination theory and diminished functioning: The role of interpersonal control and psychological need thwarting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1459–1473. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211413125 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bartholomew, K. J., Ntoumanis, N., Ryan, R. M., & Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C. (2011). Psychological need thwarting in the sport context: Assessing the darker side of athletic experience. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 33, 75–102. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.33.1.75 Google Scholar

Bhavsar, N., Ntoumanis, N., Quested, E. et al. (2019). Conceptualizing and testing a new tripartite measure of coach interpersonal behaviors. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 44, 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2019.05.006 CrossRef Google Scholar

Brekelmans, M. (1989). Interpersonal Teacher Behavior in the Classroom. Utrecht: W. C. C.Google Scholar

Cheon, S. H., & Reeve, J. (2013). Do the benefits from autonomy-supportive PE teacher training programs endure? A one-year follow-up investigation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14, 508–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.02.002 Google Scholar

Cheon, S. H., & Reeve, J. (2015). A classroom-based intervention to help teachers decrease students’ amotivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 40, 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.06.004 CrossRef Google Scholar

Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., Lee, J., & Lee, Y. (2015). Giving and receiving autonomy support in a high-stakes sport context: A field-based experiment during the 2012 London Paralympic Games. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 19, 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.02.007 Google Scholar

Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., Lee, Y., & Lee, J.-W. (2018). Why autonomy-supportive interventions work: Explaining the professional development of teachers’ motivating styles. Teaching and Teacher Education, 69, 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.09.022 CrossRef Google Scholar

Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., Lee, Y. et al. (2019). Expanding autonomy psychological need states from two (satisfaction, frustration) to three (dissatisfaction): A classroom-based intervention study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111, 685–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000306 Google Scholar

Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., & Moon, I. S. (2012). Experimentally based, longitudinally designed, teacher-focused intervention to help physical education teachers be more autonomy supportive toward their students. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 34, 365–396. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.34.3.365 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., & Ntoumanis, N. (2018). A needs-based intervention to help PE teachers enhance students’ prosocial behavior and diminish antisocial behavior. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 35, 74–88. https:doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.11.010 CrossRef Google Scholar

Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., & Song, Y.-G. (2016). A teacher-focused intervention to decrease PE students’ amotivation by increasing need satisfaction and decreasing need frustration. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 38, 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2015-0236 Google Scholar

Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., & Song, Y.-G. (2019). Recommending goals and supporting needs: An intervention to help physical education teachers communicate their expectations while supporting students’ psychological needs. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 41, 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.12.008 CrossRef Google Scholar

Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., Yu, T. H., & Jang, H.-R. (2014). The teacher benefits from giving autonomy support during physical education instruction. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 36, 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2013-0231 Google Scholar

Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2020). Expanding a traditional autonomy-supportive intervention into a multiple motivating styles intervention for PE teachers: Benefits to students, benefits to teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.103004 Google Scholar

Costa, A., Ntoumanis, N., & Bartholomew, K. (2015). Predicting the brighter and darker sides of interpersonal relationships: Does psychological need thwarting matter? Motivation and Emotion, 39, 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014-9427-0 CrossRef Google Scholar

Crozier, A. J. (2019). Step up: Exploring the impact of social prompts on stair use in a university setting. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 41, 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.11.015 Google Scholar

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 109–134. http://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023–6Google Scholar

Deci, E. L., Schwartz, A., Sheinman, L., & Ryan, R. M. (1981). An instrument to assess adults’ orientations toward control versus autonomy in children: Reflections on intrinsic motivation and perceived competence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 642–650. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.73.5.642 Google Scholar

De Meyer, J., Tallir, I., Soenens, B. et al. (2014). Does observed controlling teaching behavior relate to students’ motivation in physical education? Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 541–554. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034399 Google Scholar

Gunnell, K., Crocker, P. R. E., Wilson, P. M., Mack, D. E., & Zumbo, B. D. (2013). Psychological need satisfaction and thwarting: A test of basic psychological needs theory in physical activity contexts. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14, 599–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.03.007 CrossRef Google Scholar

Haerens, L., Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Soenens, B., & Van Petegem, S. (2015). Do perceived autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching relate to physical education students’ motivational experiences through unique pathways? Distinguishing between the bright and dark side of motivation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 16, 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.08.013 CrossRef Google Scholar

Hardre, P. L., & Reeve, J. (2009). Training corporate managers to adopt a more autonomy-supportive motivating style toward employees: An intervention study. International Journal of Training Development, 13, 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2419.2009.00325.x CrossRef Google Scholar

Jang, H., Reeve, J., Ryan, R. M., & Kim, A. (2009). Can self-determination theory explain what underlies the productive, satisfying learning experiences of collectivistically-oriented South Korean adolescents? Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 644–661. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014241 Google Scholar

Jang, H., Kim, E.-J., & Reeve, J. (2016). Why students become more engaged or more disengaged during the semester: A self-determination theory dual-process model. Learning and Instruction, 43, 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.002 Google Scholar

Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Halusic, M. (2016). A new autonomy-supportive way of teaching that increases conceptual learning: Teaching in students’ preferred ways. Journal of Experimental Education, 84, 686–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2015.1083522 CrossRef Google Scholar

Matos, L., & Gargurevich, R. (2019). An autonomy-supportive intervention to help Peruvian college instructors support their students’ autonomy. Unpublished manuscript, Pontifical Catholic University of Peru.Google Scholar

Michie, S., Richardson, M., Johnston, M. et al. (2013). The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: Building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 46, 81–95. https/doi.org/10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6 Google Scholar

Reeve, J. (1998). Autonomy support as an interpersonal motivating style: Is it teachable? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 312–330. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1997.0975 Google Scholar

Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44, 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903028990 Google Scholar

Reeve, J. (2016). Autonomy-supportive teaching: What it is, how to do it. In Wang, J. C. K., Liu, W. C., & Ryan, R. M. (Eds.), Building Autonomous Learners: Perspectives from Research and Practice Using Self-Determination Theory (pp. 129–152). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Reeve, J., & Cheon, S. H. (2016). Teachers become more autonomy supportive after they believe it is easy to do. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 22, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.08.001 Google Scholar

Reeve, J., & Cheon, S. H. (2019). Sociocultural influences on teachers’ reactions to an intervention to help them become more autonomy supportive. In Liem, G. A. D. & McInerney, D. M. (Eds.), School Motivation Intervention: Sociocultural Influences. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing high school students’ engagement by increasing their teachers’ autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28, 147–169. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MOEM.0000032312.95499.6 fCrossRef Google Scholar

Reeve, J., Jang, H.-R., & Jang, H. (2018). Personality-based antecedents of teachers’ autonomy-supportive and controlling motivating styles. Learning and Individual Differences, 62, 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.01.001 CrossRef Google Scholar

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Soenens, B., Sierens, E., Vansteenkiste, M., Goossens, L., & Dochy, F. (2012). Psychologically controlling teaching: Examining outcomes, antecedents, and mediators. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 108–120. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025742 Google Scholar

Su, Y., & Reeve, J. (2011). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of intervention programs designed to support autonomy. Educational Psychology Review, 23, 159–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9142-7 Google Scholar

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036–1Google Scholar

Vansteenkiste, M., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). On psychological growth and vulnerability: Basic psychological need satisfaction and need frustration as a unifying principle. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 23, 263–280. https/doi.org/10.1037/a0032359 CrossRef Google Scholar

Weber-Gasparoni, K., Warren, J. J., Reeve, J., Drake, D. R., Kramer, K. W. O., & Dawson, D. V. (2013). An effective psychoeducational intervention for ECC prevention – Part 2. Pediatric Dentistry, 35, 247–251.Google Scholar

Williams, G. C., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Internalization of biopsychosocial values by medical students: A test of self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 767–779. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.767 Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.2 AAA

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

The HTML of this chapter complies with version 2.2 of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), offering more comprehensive accessibility measures for a broad range of users and attains the highest (AAA) level of WCAG compliance, optimising the user experience by meeting the most extensive accessibility guidelines.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.

Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.

Reading Order & Textual Equivalents

Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.

Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.

Visualised data also available as non-graphical data
You can access graphs or charts in a text or tabular format, so you are not excluded if you cannot process visual displays.

Visual Accessibility

Use of high contrast between text and background colour
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.

Book contents

35 - Autonomy-Supportive Interventions

Summary