Interpersonal Grammar in Mandarin

doi:10.1017/9781108663120.004

4 - Interpersonal Grammar in Mandarin

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 May 2021

Edited by

Beatriz Quiroz and

J. R. Martin: Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Beatriz Quiroz: Affiliation:
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
Giacomo Figueredo: Affiliation:
Federal University of Ouro Preto, Brazil

Book contents

Get access

Summary

This chapter is a text-based study of the enactment of interpersonal meaning in Mandarin, with particular focus on the MOOD system and structure, part of interpersonal grammar that is involved in the realisation of the discourse-semantic system of NEGOTIATION. The data considered is taken from the genres of criminal case courtroom discourse, realised interpersonally by a tenor of unequal social status and lack of reciprocity of linguistic choices among the speakers. The study adopts an axis-oriented trinocular perspective, foregrounding paradigmatic relations as the fundamental principle of linguistic organisation and reasoning about system-structure relations from above, round about and below. The analysis shows that MOOD in Mandarin is not only responsible for negotiating knowledge and action exchanges between moves in dialogue, but also closely interacts with MODALITY and POLARITY systems that are associated with the subsystem ENGAGEMENT of the discourse semantic system APPRAISAL. Therefore a complementary description of Mandarin MOOD is presented with a perspective oriented toward both NEGOTIATION and ENGAGEMENT.

Keywords

interpersonal grammar Mandarin MOOD NEGOTIATION ENGAGEMENT

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Interpersonal Grammar
Systemic Functional Linguistic Theory and Description
, pp. 96 - 129

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108663120.004 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Berry, M. (1981). Systemic Linguistics and Discourse Analysis: A Multi-Layered Approach to Exchange Structure. In Coulthard, M. and Montgomery, M., eds., Studies in Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 120–45.Google Scholar

Caffarel, A. (2006). A Systemic Functional Grammar of French. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Caffarel, A., Martin, J. R. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., eds., (2004). Language Typology: A Functional Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Ding, L. (1999). 从问句系统看“是不是”问句 [Cong wenju xitong kan ‘shi bu shi’ wenju, A Study of ‘Shi Bu Shi’ Questions from the Perspective of Question System]. 中国语文 [Zhongguo Yuwen, Studies of the Chinese Language], 6, 415–20.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1984). Language as Code and Language as Behaviour: A Systemic-Functional Interpretation of the Nature and Ontogenesis of Dialogue. In Fawcett, R. P., Halliday, M. A. K., Lamb, S. M. and Makkai, A., eds., Language as Social Semiotic. Vol I. of The Semiotics of Language and Culture. London: Pinter, pp. 3–35.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1992). Systemic Grammar and the Concept of a ‘Science of Language’. Waiguoyu (Journal of Foreign Languages), 2, 1–9.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd ed. London: Arnold.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1996). On Grammar and Grammatics. In Hasan, R., Cloran, C. and Butt, D., eds., Functional Descriptions: Language Form and Linguistic Theory. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 1–38.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1999). Construing Experience Through Meaning: A Language-based Approach to Cognition. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday‘s Introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th ed. London: Routledge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. & McDonald, E. (2004). Metafunctional Profile of the Grammar of Chinese. In Caffarel, A., Martin, J. R. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., eds., Language Typology: A Functional Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 305–96.Google Scholar

Hu, Y. (2011). 现代汉语 [Xiandai Hanyu, Modern Chinese]. Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press.Google Scholar PubMed

Huang, B. (1984). 陈述句，疑问句，祈使句，感叹句 [Chenshu Ju, Yiwen Ju, Qishi Ju, Gantan Ju, Declaratives, Interrogatives, Imperatives, Exclamatives]. Shanghai: Shanghai Education Publishing House.Google Scholar

Huang, B. & Liao, X. (2002). 现代汉语 [Xiandai Hanyu, Modern Chinese] II. Beijing: Higher Education Press.Google Scholar

Li, E. S. (2007). A Systemic Functional Grammar of Chinese: A Text-based Analysis. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Li, C. N. & Thompson, S. A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. (1992). English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. (2002). Meaning Beyond the Clause: SFL Perspectives. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 52–74.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. (2004). Metafunctional Profile of the Grammar of Tagalog. In Caffarel, A., Martin, J. R. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., eds., Language Typology: A Functional Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 255–304.CrossRef Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. (2014). Evolving Systemic Functional Linguistics: Beyond the Clause. Functional Linguistics, 1 (3).CrossRef Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. (2015). Meaning beyond the Clause: Co-Textual Relations. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 11 (2–3), 203–35.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. (2018). Interpersonal Meaning: Systemic Functional Linguistics Perspective. Functions of Language, 25(1), 2–19.CrossRef Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. & Quiroz, B. (2020). Functional Language Typology: A Discourse Semantic Perspective. In Martin, J. R., Doran, Y. J. and Figueredo, G., eds., Systemic Functional Language Description: Making Meaning Matter. New York and London: Routledge, pp. 189–237.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. & Rose, D. (2007). Working with Discourse: Meaning beyond the Clause, 2nd ed., London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. & Rose, D. (2008). Genre Relations: Mapping Culture. London/Oakville: Equinox.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. & White, P. (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. & Zappavigna, M. (2016). Rites of Passion: Remorse, Apology and Forgiveness in Youth Justice Conferencing. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 12 (2–3),101–21.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R., Wang, P. & Zhu, Y. (2013). Systemic Functional Grammar: A Next Step into the Theory – Axial Relations. Beijing: Higher Education Press.Google Scholar

Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). Descriptive Motifs and Generalisations. In Caffarel, A., Martin, J. R. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., eds., Language Typology: A Functional Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 537–673.CrossRef Google Scholar

Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. & Halliday, M. A. K. (2009). Systemic Functional Grammar: A First Step into the Theory. Beijing: Higher Education Press.Google Scholar

Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., Teruya, K. & Wu, C. (2008). Multilingual Studies as Multi-Dimensional Space of Interconnected Language Studies. In Webster, J., ed., Meaning in Context: Implementing Intelligent Applications. London/New York: Continuum, pp. 146–220.Google Scholar

McDonald, E. (1998). Clause and Verbal Group Systems in Chinese: A Text-based Functional Approach. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar

Quiroz, B. (2008). Towards a Systemic Profile of the Spanish mood. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 4(1), 31–65.CrossRef Google Scholar

Quiroz, B. (2018). Negotiating Interpersonal Meaning: Reasoning about mood. Functions of Language, 25(1), 135–63.Google Scholar

Sinclair, J. M. & Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Steiner, E. & Teich, E. (2004). Metafunctional Profile of the Grammar of German. In Caffarel, A., Martin, J. R. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., eds., Language Typology: A Functional Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 139–84.Google Scholar

Tao, L. (1998). “是不是”问句说略 [‘Shi bu shi’ wenju shuolue, A Brief Account of ‘Shi Bu Shi’ Questions]. 中国语文 [Zhongguo Yuwen, Studies of the Chinese Language], 2, 105–7.Google Scholar

Teruya, K., Akerejola, E., Andersen, T. H., Caffarel, A., Lavid, J., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., Petersen, U. H., Patpong, P. & Smedegaard, F. (2007). Typology of mood: A Text-Based and System-Based Functional View. In Hasan, R., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. and Webster, J., eds., Continuing Discourse on Language: Functional Perspective, vol. II. London: Equinox, pp. 859–920.Google Scholar

Thai, M. D. (2004). Metafunctional Profile of the Grammar of Vietnamese. In Caffarel, A., Martin, J. R. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., eds., Language Typology: A Functional Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 397–431.Google Scholar

Ventola, E. (1987). The Structure of Social Interaction: A Systemic Approach to the Semiotics of Service Encounters. London: Pinter.Google Scholar

Wang, P. (2020). Axial Argumentation and Cryptogrammar in Interpersonal Grammar: A Case Study of Classical Tibetan mood. In Martin, J. R., Doran, Y. and Figueredo, G., eds., Systemic Functional Language Description: Making Meaning Matter. London: Routledge, 73–101.Google Scholar

Whorf, B. L. (circa 1936). A Linguistic Consideration of Thinking in Primitive Communities. In Whorf, B. L. (1956), Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. (Edited and with an introduction by Carroll, J. B. ). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 65–86.Google Scholar

Whorf, B. L. (1937). Grammatical Categories. In Whorf, B. L. (1956), Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. (Edited and with an introduction by Carroll, J. B. ). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 87–101.Google Scholar

Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Edited and with an introduction by Carroll, J. B.. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Zhang, B. (1997). 疑问句功能琐议 [Yiwenju gongneng suoyi, Trivial Comments on the Functions of Questions]. 中国语文 [Zhongguo Yuwen, Studies of the Chinese Language], 2, 104–10.Google Scholar PubMed

Zhang, D. (2009). 汉语语气系统的特点 [Hanyu yuqi xitong de tedian, Some Characteristics of Chinese mood System]. 外国语文 [Waiguo Yuwen, Foreign Language and Literature], 25 (5), 1–7.Google Scholar

Zhu, D. (1982). 语法讲义 [Yufa Jiangyi, Lectures on Chinese Grammar]. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.