Fuzzy-Set Analysis of Network Data as Mixed Method

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139227193.013

9 - Fuzzy-Set Analysis of Network Data as Mixed Method

Personal Networks and the Transition from School to Work

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2014

Betina Hollstein and

Claudius Wagemann

Edited by

Silvia Domínguez and

Betina Hollstein

Show author details

Betina Hollstein: Affiliation:
Universität Bremen
Claudius Wagemann: Affiliation:
Goethe University
Silvia Domínguez: Affiliation:
Northeastern University, Boston
Betina Hollstein: Affiliation:
Universität Bremen

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

Entering the labor market marks a decisive juncture in setting the course for a young adult’s career and future life. In the face of increasing youth unemployment and rapidly shifting labor markets, the question of the determinants of successful or unsuccessful transitions into gainful employment deserves particular attention. In this chapter, we analyze the conditions that affect these school-to-work transitions. To do so, we focus on the particularly vulnerable group of youth with less education, who face higher risks in this phase of life. We ask under which conditions do these youth, after a failed search for an apprenticeship, actually succeed in finding work? We investigate both individual characteristics (such search behaviors) and the network aspects – functional aspects (cognitive, instrumental, and emotional support of network members), structural aspects (like network size and composition), and attributes of network members, such as occupational status of parents.

The database consists of qualitative longitudinal data collected by the Collaborative Research Center (CRC) 333 “Perspectives on the Development of Work” based at the Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich. We conducted a secondary analysis of these data using fuzzy set analysis, a particular form of Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA; Ragin 2000, 2008). In this chapter, we demonstrate how and under what conditions fuzzy set QCA can be employed to conduct research into social networks. We consider QCA a mixed method as it integrates thick descriptions, a common feature of qualitative methods, with data reduction, which is characteristic of quantitative methods. It is especially suited for the analysis of medium-sized samples as it specifically allows us to model both complex solutions and equivalent terms of solutions for combinations of factors. As we will demonstrate, the application of fuzzy set analysis facilitates systematic case comparisons and supports the construction of typologies that strongly build on the individual cases. Methodologically, our study is considered a “conversion design” (Tashakkori and Teddlie 2009), in which qualitative data are transformed into numeric data. The various network aspects are described as individual characteristics and then used to explain individual behavior.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Mixed Methods Social Networks Research
Design and Applications
, pp. 237 - 268
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139227193.013 [Opens in a new window]
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adams, Gerald R. and Berzonsky, Michael D., eds. 2003. Blackwell Handbook of Adolescence. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Adams, Gerald R., Gullotta, Thomas P., and Montemayor, Raymond, eds. 1992. Adolescent Identity Formation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Adler, Rolf H. et al., eds. 1996. Psychosomatische Medizin. Munich, Vienna, Baltimore: Urban und Schwarzenberg.Google Scholar

Bartolini, Stefano. 1993. “On time and comparative research.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 5(2):131–67.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bott, Elizabeth. 1957. Family and Social Network. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar

Boxman, Edward A., Graaf, Paul M. de, and Flap, Hendrik D.. 1991. “The impact of social and human capital on the income attainment of Dutch managers.” Social Networks 13:51–73.CrossRef Google Scholar

Brady, Henry E. and Collier, David, eds. 2004. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Brown, Duane and Brooks, Linda, eds. 1990. Career Choice and Development: Applying Contemporary Theories to Practice. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Caramani, Danièle. 2008. Introduction to the Comparative Method with Boolean Algebra. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Coleman, James S., ed. 1990a. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Coleman, James S. 1990b. “Social capital.” Pp. 300–21 in Foundations of Social Theory, edited by Coleman, J. S.. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Coleman, John C. and Hendry, Leo B. 1990. The Nature of Adolescence. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Della Porta, Donatella. 2008. “Comparative analysis: Case-oriented versus variable-oriented research.” Pp. 198–222 in Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences, edited by Della Porta, D. and Keating, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Porta, Della and Keating, M. and Keating, Michael, eds. 2008. Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

DeMeur, Gisèle, Rihoux, Benoit, and Yamasaki, Sakura. 2009. “Addressing the critiques of QCA.” Pp. 147–67 in Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques, edited by Rihoux, B. and Ragin, C. C.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Diewald, Martin. 1991. Soziale Beziehungen: Verlust oder Liberalisierung?: Soziale Unterstützung in informellen Netzwerken. Berlin: Ed. Sigma.Google Scholar

Fend, Helmut. 1991. Identitätsentwicklung in der Adoleszenz: Lebensentwürfe, Selbstfindung und Weltaneignung in beruflichen, familiären und politisch-weltanschaulichen Bereichen. Bern: Huber.Google Scholar

Fend, Helmut. 1998. Eltern und Freunde: Soziale Entwicklung im Jugendalter. Bern: Huber.Google Scholar

Filipp, Sigrun-Heide and Aymanns, Peter. 1996. “Bewältigungsstrategien (Coping).” Pp. 277–90 in Psychosomatische Medizin, edited by Adler, R. H., Herrmann, J. M., Schoenecke, O. W., Von Uexküll, T., and Wesiak, W.. Munich, Vienna, Baltimore: Urban und Schwarzenberg.Google Scholar

Finch, Michael D. and Mortimer, Jeylin T.. 1996. “Future directions for research on adolescents, work, and family.” Pp. 221–37 in Adolescents, Work, and Family: An Intergenerational Developmental Analysis, edited by Mortimer, J. T. and Finch, M. D.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Flum, Hanoch and Blustein, David L.. 2000. “Reinvigorating the study of vocational exploration: A framework for research.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 56(3):380–404.CrossRef Google Scholar

Glaser, Barney G. and Strauss, Anselm L.. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar

Goertz, Gary. 2003. “The substantive importance of necessary condition hypotheses.” Pp. 65–94 in Necessary Conditions: Theory, Methodology, and Applications, edited by Goertz, G. and Starr, H.. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Goertz, Garyand Starr, Harvey, eds. 2003. Necessary Conditions: Theory, Methodology, and Applications. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Granovetter, Mark S. [1995] 1974. Getting A Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Hall, Peter A. 2003. “Aligning ontology and methodology in comparative politics.” Pp. 373–404 in Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by Mahoney, J. and Rueschemeyer, D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Harris, Judith R. 1998. The Nurture Assumption: Why Children Turn Out the Way They Do. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Heinz, Walter R. et al. 1998. “Vocational training and career development in germany: Results from a longitudinal study.” International Journal of Behavioral Development 22(1):77–101.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hollstein, Betina. 2001. Grenzen sozialer Integration: Zur Konzeption informeller Beziehungen und Netzwerke. Leverkusen: Leske + Budrich.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hollstein, Betina and Pfeffer, Jürgen. 2010. “Netzwerkkarten als Instrument zur Erhebung egozentrierter Netzwerke.” In Unsichere Zeiten: Verhandlungen des 34. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie, edited by Soeffner, H. G.. Frankfurt/M.: Campus.Google Scholar

Hollstein, Betina and Töpfer, Tom. 2013. “ Netzwerke als Ressource oder Restriktion? Arbeitsmarkteinstieg sozial benachteiligter junger Erwachsener – Eine Fuzzy-Set-Analyse von Netzwerkeffekten.” Working paper. Hamburg: Universität Hamburg.

Hoose, Daniela and Vorholt, Dagmar. 1996. Sicher sind wir wichtig, irgendwie!? Der Einfluss der Eltern auf das Berufswahlverhalten von Frauen: Eine Untersuchung im Auftrag des Senatsamtes für die Gleichstellung. Hamburg.Google Scholar

Keupp, Heiner et al. 2008. Identitätskonstruktionen: Das Patchwork der Identitäten in der Spätmoderne. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.Google Scholar

Kohn, Melvin L. and Schooler, Carmi. 1983. Work and Personality: An Inquiry into the Impact of Social Stratification. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Kracke, Bärbel. 2002. “The role of personality, parents and peers in adolescents career exploration.” Journal of Adolescence 25(1):19–30.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kracke, Bärbel and Schmitt-Rodermund, Eva. 2001. “Adolescents’ career exploration in the context of educational and occupational transitions.” Pp. 141–68 in Navigating through Adolescence: European Perspectives, edited by Nurmi, J. E.. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kraheck, Nicole. 2004. Karrieren jenseits normaler Erwerbsarbeit: Lebenslagen, Lebensentwürfe und Bewältigungsstrategien von Jugendlichen und jungen Erwachsenen in Stadtteilen mit besonderem Erneuerungsbedarf. München; Halle.Google Scholar

Lex, Tilly. 1997. Berufswege Jugendlicher zwischen Integration und Ausgrenzung. München.Google Scholar

Lin, Nan and Ao, Dan. 2008. “The invisible hand of social capital.” Pp. 107–132 in Social Capital: An International Research Program, edited by Lin, N. and Erickson, B.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lin, Nan, Ensel, Walter M., and Vaughn, John C.. 1981a. “Social resources and strength of ties: Structural factors in occupational status attainment.” American Sociological Review 46(4):393–405.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lin, Nan, Ensel, Walter M., and Vaughn, John C.. 1981b. “Full access social resources and occupational status attainment.” Social Forces 59(4):1163–81.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mackie, John L. 1974. The Cement of the Universe. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Mahoney, James. 2000. “Strategies of causal inference in small-N analysis.” Sociological Methods & Research 28(4):387–424.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mahoney, James. 2003. “Strategies of causal assessment in comparative historical analysis.” Pp. 337–72 in Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by Mahoney, J. and Rueschemeyer, D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mahoney, James and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, eds. 2003. Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mahoney, James, Kimball, Erin, and Koivu, Kendra L.. 2009. “The logic of historical explanation in the social sciences.“ Comparative Political Studies 42(1):114–46.CrossRef Google Scholar

Marcia, James E. 1993. “The status of the statuses: Research review.” Pp. 22–41 in Ego Identity: A Handbook for Psychosocial Research, edited by Marcia, J. E., Waterman, A. S., Matteson, D. R., Archer, S. L., and L.Orlofsky, J.. New York: Springer.CrossRef Google Scholar

Marcia, James E. et al., eds. 1993. Ego Identity: A Handbook for Psychosocial Research. New York: Springer.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mortimer, Jeyland T. and Kumka, Donald. 1982. “A further examination of the ‘Occupational Linkage Hypothesis’.” Sociological Quarterly 23(1):3–16.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mortimer, Jeylin T. and Finch, Michael D., eds. 1996. Adolescents, Work, and Family: An Intergenerational Developmental Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Mortimer, Jeylan T. et al. 2002. “The process of occupational decision making: Patterns during the transition to adulthood.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 61(3):439–65.CrossRef Google Scholar

Munck, Gerardo L. 2001. “The regime question: Theory building in democracy studies.” World Politics 54(1):119–44.CrossRef Google Scholar

Nurmi, Jari-Erik, ed. 2001. Navigating through Adolescence: European Perspectives. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Pfaff, Holger. 1989. Stressbewältigung und soziale Unterstützung: Zur sozialen Regulierung individuellen Wohlbefindens. Weinheim: Deutscher Studien Verlag.Google Scholar

Pfeffer, Jürgen, Straus, Florian, and Hollstein, Betina. 2008. EgoNet.QF. Software for Data Collecting Processing and Analyzing Ego-Centric Networks. User’s Manual for EgoNet.QF, Version 2.12. Vienna, Munich, Berlin. Ms.Google Scholar

Ragin, Charles C. 1987. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitiative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Ragin, Charles C.. 1991. “Introduction: Cases of ‘What is a case?’” Pp. 1–17 in What Is a Case?: Exploring the Foundations Of Social Inquiry, edited by Ragin, C. C. and Becker, H. S.. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ragin, Charles C.. 1994. Constructing Social Research. The Unity and Diversity of Method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.

Ragin, Charles C.. 2000. Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Ragin, Charles C.. 2004. “Turning the tables: How case-oriented research challenges variable-oriented research.” Pp. 123–38 in Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, edited by Brady, H. E. and Collier, D.. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Ragin, Charles C.. 2008. Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ragin, Charles C. and Becker, Howard S., eds. 1991. What is a case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ragin, Charles C. and Zaret, David. 1983. “Theory and method in comparative research: Two strategies.” Social Forces 61(3):731–54.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rihoux, Benoît and Ragin, Charles C.. eds. 2009. Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRef Google Scholar

Šavît, Yôsî and Müller, Walter, eds. 1998. From School to Work: A Comparative Study of Educational Qualifications and Occupational Destinations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Schmitter, Philippe C. 2002. “Seven disputable theses.” European Political Science 1(2):23–40.CrossRef Google Scholar

Schnabel, Kai U., et al. 2002. “Parental influence on students’ educational choices in the United States and Germany: Different ramifications – Same effect?”Journal of Vocational Behavior 60(2):178–98.CrossRef Google Scholar

Schneider, Carsten Q. and Grofman, Bernard. 2006. “It might look like a regression ... But it’s not! An intuitive approach to the presentation of QCA and fs/QCA results.” Tokyo.

Schneider, Carsten Q. and Wagemann, Claudius, eds. 2007. Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) und Fuzzy Sets: Ein Lehrbuch für Anwender und jene, die es werden wollen. Opladen: Barbara Budrich.Google Scholar

Schneider, Carsten Q. and Wagemann, Claudius. 2010. “Standards of good practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets.” Comparative Sociology 9(3):397–418.CrossRef Google Scholar

Schneider, Carsten Q. and Wagemann, Claudius, eds. 2012. Set-Theoretic Methods in the Social Sciences: A User’s Guide for Qualitative Comparative Analysis and Fuzzy-Sets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Seawright, Jason and Collier, David. 2004. “Glossary of selected terms.” Pp. 273–313 in Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, edited by Brady, H. E. and Collier, D.. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Smilde, David. 2005. “A qualitative comparative analysis of conversion to Venezuelan evangelicalism: How networks matter.” American Journal of Sociology 111(3):757–96.CrossRef Google Scholar

Soeffner, Hans-Georg. 2010. Unsichere Zeiten: Verhandlungen des 34. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie. Frankfurt/M.: Campus.CrossRef Google Scholar

Solga, Heike. 2005. Ohne Abschluss in die Bildungsgesellschaft: Die Erwerbschancen gering qualifizierter Personen aus soziologischer und ökonomischer Perspektive. Opladen: B. Budrich.CrossRef Google Scholar

Steiner, Christine. 2004. “Guter Rat ist teuer. Nutzung von Unterstützungs- und Beratungsleistungen durch Jugendliche bei der Suche nach Ausbildungsmöglichkeiten.” Pp. 25–51 in Jugend – Ausbildung – Arbeit. Bildung und Beschäftigung in Ostdeutschland, Vol. 2, edited by Lutz, B., Grünert, H., and Steiner, C.. Berlin.Google Scholar

Straus, Florian. 1994. Netzwerkanalyse – Egozentrierte Netzwerkkarten als Instrument zur Erhebung von sozialen Beziehungen in qualitativen Interviews: Materialien (48) des Teilprojekts A6. München.Google Scholar

Straus, Florian. 2004. EGONET QF: Ein Manual zur egozentrierten Netzwerkanalyse für die qualitative Forschung. München: Manuscript.Google Scholar

Super, Donald E. 1990. “A life-span, life-space approach to career development.” Pp. 197–261 in Career Choice and Development: Applying Contemporary Theories to Practice, 2nd ed., edited by Brown, D. and Brooks, L.. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Tashakkori, Abbas and Teddlie, Charles. 2009. “Integrating qualitative and quantitative approaches to research.” Pp. 283–317 in The Sage Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods, 2nd ed., edited by Bickmand, L. and Rog, D. J.. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar

Teddlie, Charles and Tashakkori, Abbas. 2006. “A general typology of research designs featuring mixed methods.” Research in the Schools 13(1):12–28.Google Scholar

Vondracek, Fred W. and Porfeli, Erik J.. 2003. “The world of work and careers.” Pp. 109–29 in Blackwell Handbook of Adolescence, edited by Adams, G. R. and Berzonsky, M. D.. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Wagemann, Claudius and Schneider, Carsten Q.. 2010. “Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and fuzzy sets: The agenda for a research approach and a data analysis technique.” Comparative Sociology 9(3):376–96.CrossRef Google Scholar

Wegener, Bernd. 1991. “Job mobility and social ties: social resources, prior job, and status attainment.” American Sociological Review 56(1):60–71.CrossRef Google Scholar

Wilson, William J. 1997. When Work Disappears: The World of the New Urban Poor. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar

Youniss, James. 1980. Parents and Peers in Social Development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.