Garamantian Ceramic Technology

doi:10.1017/9781108908047.014

13 - Garamantian Ceramic Technology

Change and Exchange in a Trans-Saharan Perspective

from Part V - Handmade Pottery

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 September 2020

Edited by

A. Cuénod and

C. N. Duckworth: Affiliation:
University of Newcastle upon Tyne
A. Cuénod: Affiliation:
University of Leicester
D. J. Mattingly: Affiliation:
University of Leicester

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Studies of ceramics in North Africa often favour the analysis of wheel-made over handmade pottery. However, the handmade ceramics are particularly important if we attempt to explore technological transfers within the trans-Saharan region. This chapter presents the ceramic evidence of the Wadi al-Ajal and the Wadi Tanzzuft, two areas of the Libyan Sahara, in order to define the technological characteristics of Garamantian handmade pottery between the first millennium BC and the first millennium AD. After a discussion of the raw materials, shapes and decorations of the pots, the chronological and geographical variations within the Garamantian assemblage are presented. These traits are then compared to pottery from other sites across the Sahara, including some of earlier dates. Finally, drawing on workshop discussions with experts in pottery from across Saharan and West African sites, an attempt is made to analyse the potential transfer of certain traits in a Trans-Saharan perspective, as well as the social context of this transfer. An important result is the identification in Garamantian pottery of roulette decoration, not previously observed so far north. Although connections might be traced between the Sahara and the Sahel from the late pastoral period, experts remain cautious as to their exact nature.

Keywords

Garamantes handmade pottery ceramics style roulette decoration

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Mobile Technologies in the Ancient Sahara and Beyond , pp. 453 - 484
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108908047.014 [Opens in a new window]
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Arazi, N. and Manning, K. 2010. Twisted cord roulette/Roulette de cordelette torsadée. In Haour et al. 2010, 134–43.Google Scholar

Artioli, G., Laddaga, L. and Dapiaggi, M. 2006. Archaeometry of pottery: Mineralogical and chemical analyses. In Liverani 2006, 249–57.Google Scholar

Berkani, H., Zazzo, A. and Paris, F. 2015. Les tumulus à couloir et enclos de la Tassili du Fadnoun, Tassili Azger (Algérie): Premières datations par la méthode du radiocarbone. Journal of African Archaeology 13.1: 59–70.Google Scholar

Camps, G. 1956. La céramique des sépultures berbères de Tiddis. Libyca 4: 155–203.Google Scholar

Camps, G. 1961. Aux origines de la Berbérie: Monuments et rites funéraires protohistoriques. Paris: AMG.Google Scholar

Caneva, I. 1987. Pottery decoration in prehistoric Sahara and Upper Nile: A new perspective. In Barich, B.E. (ed.), Archaeology and Environment in the Libyan Sahara, Oxford: Archaeopress, 231–54.Google Scholar

Caneva, I. 1988. El Geili: The History of a Middle Nile Environment, 7000 BC–AD 1500. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar

Caneva, I. and Marks, A. 1990. More on Shaqadud pottery: Evidence for Saharo-Nilotic connections during the 6th–4th Millennium BC. Archéologie du Nil Moyen 6: 65–92.Google Scholar

Castelli, R., Cremaschi, M., Gatto, M.C., Liverani, M. and Mori, L. 2005. A preliminary report of excavations in Fewet (Libyan Sahara). Journal of African Archaeology 3.1: 69–102.Google Scholar

Daniels, C.M. 1968. Garamantian excavations: Zinchecra 1965–67. Libya Antiqua 5: 113–94.Google Scholar

di Lernia, S. and Merighi, F. 2006. Transitions in the later prehistory of the Libyan Sahara as seen from the Acacus Mountains. In Mattingly, D.J., McLaren, S, Savage, E, al-Fasatwi, Y and Gadgood, K (eds), The Libyan Desert: Natural Resources and Cultural Heritage, London: Society for Libyan Studies, 111–21.Google Scholar

di Lernia, S., Merighi, F., Ricci, F., and Sivilli, S. 2002. From regions to sites: the excavations. In di Lernia S. and Manzi, G (eds), Sand, Stones and Bones: The Archaeology of Death in the Wadi Tanezzuft Valley (5000–2000 BP), AZA 3, Firenze: All’Insegna del Giglio, 69–156.Google Scholar

Dore, J.N., Leone, A. and Hawthorne, J. 2007. Pottery type series. In Mattingly 2007, 305–431.Google Scholar

Dupuy, C. 2006. L’Adrar des Iforas (Mali) à l’époque des chars: Art, religion, rapports sociaux et relations à grande distance. Sahara 17: 29–50.Google Scholar

Fili, A. 2011. La céramique de tradition amazighe. Asinag 6: 21–29.Google Scholar

Gallin, A. 2011. Les styles céramiques de Kobadi. Analyse comparative et implications chronoculturelles au Néolithique récent du Sahel malien. Frankfurt: Afrika MagnaVerlag.Google Scholar

Garcea, E.A.A. 2008. The ceramics from Adrar Bous and surroundings. In Clark, J.D. and Gifford-Gonzalez, D (eds), Adrar Bous: Archaeology of a Central Saharan Granitic Ring Complex in Niger, Tervuren: Royal Museum for Central Africa, 245–89.Google Scholar

Garcea, E.A.A. 2013. Manufacturing technology of the ceramic assemblages. In Garcea, E.A.A. (ed.), Gobero: The No-Return Frontier. Archaeology and Landscape at the Saharo-Sahelian Borderland, Frankfurt am Main: Africa Magna Verlag, 209–40.Google Scholar

Gatto, M.C. 2002. Early Neolithic pottery of the Nabta-Kiseiba area: Stylistic attributes and regional relationships. In Nelson, K and Associates (eds), Holocene Settlements of the Egyptian Sahara, Vol. II, the Pottery of Nabta Playa, New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publisher, 65–78.Google Scholar

Gatto, M. 2006a. The local pottery. In Liverani 2006, 201–40.Google Scholar

Gatto, M.C. 2006b. The Khartoum Variant pottery in context: Rethinking the Early and Middle Holocene Nubian sequence. Archéologie du Nil Moyen 10: 57–72.Google Scholar

Gatto, M.C. 2006c. The most ancient pottery from the Dongola Reach (Northern Sudan): New data from the SFDAS survey related to the construction of the Merowe Dam. Archéologie Du Nil Moyen 10: 73–86.Google Scholar

Gatto, M.C. 2010. The Garamantes of the Fazzan: Imported pottery and local productions. Bollettino di Archeologia, special volume: 30–38.Google Scholar

Gatto, M.C. 2013a. Ceramics from Fewet. In Mori 2013, 79–92.Google Scholar

Gatto, M.C. 2013b. Preliminary report on the most ancient pottery from the Kerma region. In Honegger, M, Gatto, M.C., Fallet, C and Bundi, M, Archaeological Excavation at Kerma (Sudan), Kerma, Documents de la mission archéologique Suisse au Soudan 5, Neuchâtel: Université de Neuchâtel, 4–10.Google Scholar

Gatto, M.C. and Zerboni, A. 2015. Holocene supra-regional environmental crises as motor for major socio-cultural changes in Northeastern Africa and the Sahara. African Archaeological Review 32: 301–33.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gatto, M.C., Mori, L. and Zerboni, A. 2019a. Identity markers in south-western Fazzan: Were the people of the Wadi Tanzzuft/Tadrart Akakus region Garamantes? In Gatto et al. 2019b, 108–33.Google Scholar

Gatto, M.C., Mattingly, D.J., Ray, N. and Sterry, M. (eds) 2019b. Burials, Migration and Identity in the Ancient Sahara and Beyond. Trans-Saharan Archaeology, Volume 2. Series editor Mattingly, D.J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Society for Libyan Studies.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gauthier, Y. and Gauthier, C. 2008. Monuments en trou de serrure, monuments à alignement, monuments en ‘V’ et croissants: Contribution à l’étude des populations sahariennes. Cahiers de l’AARS 12: 1–20.Google Scholar

Gauthier, Y. and Gauthier, C. 2011. Des chars et des Tifnagh: Étude aréale et corrélations. Cahiers de l’AARS 15: 91–118.Google Scholar

Girard, S. 1984. Banasa préromaine: Un état de la question. Antiquités africaines 20: 11–93.Google Scholar

Gosselain, O.P. 1992. The bonfire of the enquiries. Pottery firing temperatures: What for? Journal of Archaeological Science 19: 243–59.Google Scholar

Gosselain, O.P. 1998. Social and technical identity in a clay crystal ball. In Stark, M (ed.), The Archaeology of Social Boundaries, Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 78–106.Google Scholar

Gosselain, O.P. 2000. Materializing identities: An African perspective. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 7. 3: 187–217.Google Scholar

Gosselain, O.P. 2008. Thoughts and adjustments in the potter’s backyard. In Berg, I (ed.), Breaking the Mould: Challenging the Past through Pottery, Oxford: Archaeopress, 67–79.Google Scholar

Gosselain, O.P. 2011. Pourquoi le décorer? Quelques observations sur le décor céramique en Afrique. Azania: Archaeological Research in Africa 46.1: 3–19.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gosselain, O.P. 2016. The world is like a beanstalk: Historicizing potting practice and social relations in the Niger River area. In Roddick, A and Brower Stahl, A (eds), Knowledge in Motion: Constellations of Learning across Time and Place, Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 36–66.Google Scholar

Haour, A. 2017. What made Islamic trade distinctive – as compared to Pre-Islamic trade? In Mattingly et al. 2017, 80–100.Google Scholar

Haour, A., Manning, K., Arazi, N., Gosselain, O., Guèye, N.S., Keita, D., Livingstone Smith, A., MacDonald, K., Mayor, A., McIntosh, S. and Vernet, R. (eds). 2010. African Pottery Roulettes Past and Present: Techniques, Identification and Distribution. Oxford and Oakville: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar

Hawthorne, J., Mattingly, D.J. and Daniels, C.M., with contributions by Barnett, T., Dore, J.N. and Leone, A. 2010. Zinkekra: An Early Garamantian escarpment settlement and associated sites (ZIN001–003). In Mattingly 2010, 19–84.Google Scholar

Köhler, I. 2012. Learning and children’s work in a pottery making environment in northern Côte d’Ivoire. In Spittler, G and Bourdillon, M (eds), African Children at Work: Working and Learning in Growing Up for Life, Berlin: LIT Verlag, 113–41.Google Scholar

Leitch, V., Mattingly, D.J., Williams, M., Norry, M.J., Wilkinson, I.P., Whitbread, I., Stocker, C.P. and Farman, T. 2016. Provenance of clay used in Garamantian ceramics from Jarma, Fazzan region (south-west Libya): A combined geochemical and microfossil analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science, Reports 10: 1–14.CrossRef Google Scholar

Leitch, V., Duckworth, C., Cuénod, A., Mattingly, D.J., Sterry, M. and Cole, F. 2017. Early Saharan trade: The inorganic evidence. In Mattingly et al. 2017, 287–340.Google Scholar

Leone, A. 2013a. Pottery from the Fazzan Project excavations at Jarma. In Mattingly 2013, 325–408.Google Scholar

Leone, A. 2013b. Pottery catalogues. In Mattingly 2013, 683–706.Google Scholar

Liverani, M. (ed.) 2006. Aghram Nadarif: The Barkat Oasis (Sha’abiya of Ghat, Libyan Sahara) in Garamantian Times. AZA 5. Firenze: All’Insegna del Giglio.Google Scholar

Livingstone Smith, A. 2001. Bonfire II: The return of pottery firing temperatures. Journal of Archaeological Science 28: 991–1003.CrossRef Google Scholar

Livingstone Smith, A. 2007. Histoire du décor à la roulette en Afrique subsaharienne. Journal of African Archaeology 5.2: 189–216.CrossRef Google Scholar

Livingstone Smith, A. 2010. A method of identification for rolled impressed decorations. In Haour et al. 2010, 116–30.Google Scholar

Livingstone Smith, A., Gosselain, O., Mayor, A. and Guèye, N.S. 2010. Modern roulettes in Sub-Saharan Africa. In Haour et al. 2010, 37–114.Google Scholar

MacDonald, K.C. 1996. Tichitt-Walata and the Middle Niger: Evidence for cultural contact in the second millennium BC. In Pwiti, G and Soper, R (eds), Aspects of African Archaeology: Papers from the 10th Congress of the Pan-African Association for Prehistory and Related Studies. Harare: University of Zimbabwe Publications, 429–40.Google Scholar

MacDonald, K.C. 2011. Betwixt Tichitt and the IND: The pottery of the Faïta Facies, Tichitt Tradition. Azania: Archaeological Research in Africa 46.1: 49–69.Google Scholar

Magnavita, S. 2013. Initial encounters: Seeking traces of ancient trade connections between West Africa and the wider world. Afriques: Débats, méthodes et terrains d’histoire. http://afriques.revues.org/1145.Google Scholar

Magnavita, S. 2017. Track and trace: Archaeometric approaches to the study of early Trans-Saharan trade. In Mattingly et al. 2017, 393–413.Google Scholar

Manning, K.M. 2011. Potter communities and technological tradition in the Lower Tilemsi Valley, Mali. Azania: Archaeological Research in Africa 46. 1: 70–87.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mattingly, D.J. (ed.) 2003. The Archaeology of Fazzan. Volume 1, Synthesis. London: Society for Libyan Studies, Department of Antiquities.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mattingly, D.J. (ed.) 2007. The Archaeology of Fazzan. Volume 2, Site Gazetteer, Pottery and Other Survey Finds. London: Society for Libyan Studies, Department of Antiquities.Google Scholar

Mattingly, D.J. (ed.) 2010. The Archaeology of Fazzan. Volume 3, Excavations Carried Out by C.M. Daniels. London: Society for Libyan Studies, Department of Antiquities.Google Scholar

Mattingly, D.J. (ed.) 2013. The Archaeology of Fazzan. Volume 4, Survey and Excavations at Old Jarma (Ancient Garama) Carried Out by C.M. Daniels (1962–69) and the Fazzan Project (1997–2001). London: Society for Libyan Studies, Department of Antiquities.Google Scholar

Mattingly, D.J., Leitch, V., Duckworth, C.N., Cuenod, A., Sterry, M. and Cole, F. (eds) 2017. Trade in the Ancient Sahara and Beyond. Trans-Saharan Archaeology, Volume 1. Series Editor Mattingly, D.J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Society for Libyan Studies.Google Scholar

Mattingly, D.J., Sterry, M. and Ray, N. 2019. Dying to be Garamantian: Burial, migration and identity in Fazzan. In Gatto et al. 2019b, 53–107.Google Scholar

Mayor, A. 2011. Traditions céramiques dans la boucle du Niger: Ethnoarchéologie et histoire du peuplement au temps des empires précoloniaux. Frankfurt am Main: Africa Magna Verlag.Google Scholar

Mayor, A., Huysecom, E., Gallay, A., Rasse, M. and Ballouche, A. 2005. Population dynamics and paleoclimate over the past 3000 years in the Dogon Country, Mali. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 24: 25–61.Google Scholar

McIntosh, S.K. (ed.) 1995. Excavations at Jenné-Jeno, Hambarketolo, and Kaniana (Inland Niger Delta, Mali), the 1981 Season. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Mori, L. (ed.) 2013. Life and Death of a Rural Village in Garamantian Time: Archaeological Investigation in the Oasis of Fewet (Libyan Sahara). AZA 6. Firenze: All’Insegna del Giglio.Google Scholar

Mori, L., Gatto, M.C., Ricci, F. and Zerboni, A. 2013. Life and death at Fewet. In Mori 2013, 375–87.Google Scholar

Park, D.P. 2010. Prehistoric Timbuktu and its hinterland. Antiquity 84: 1076–88.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rice, P.M. 1987. Pottery Analysis: A Sourcebook. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Roux, V. 2016. Ceramic manufacture: The chaîne opératoire approach. In Hunt, A (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Archaeological Ceramic Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 101–13.Google Scholar

Santacreu, D.A. 2014. Materiality, Techniques and Society in Pottery Production: The Technological Study of Archaeological Ceramics through Paste Analysis. Warsaw and Berlin: De Gruyter Open.Google Scholar

Schmidt, A., Arazi, N., MacDonald, K.C., Cosme, F. and Bedaux, R. 2005. La poterie. In Bedaux, R, Polet, J, Sanogo, K and Schmidt, A (eds), Recherches archéologiques á Dia dans le Delta intérieur du Niger (Mali): Bilan des saisons de fouilles 1998–2003, Leiden: CNWS Publications, 191–256.Google Scholar

Sterry, M. and Mattingly, D.J. (eds) 2020. Urbanisation and State Formation in the Ancient Sahara and Beyond, Trans-Saharan Archaeology, Volume 3, series editor D.J. Mattingly, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press and the Society for Libyan Studies.Google Scholar

Van der Leeuw, S.E. 1984. Dust to dust: A transformational view of the ceramic cycle. In Van der Leeuw, S.E. and Pritchard, A.C. (eds), The Many Dimensions of Pottery: Ceramics in Archaeology and Anthropology, Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, 707–74.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.