Book contents
- New Spaces for Difference
- New Spaces for Difference
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Cover Image
- Part ISpaces for Difference
- Part IILearning Differences in Contemporary Cultural Practices
- Part IIILearning from the Margins in Cross-Contextual Struggles
- Chapter 7Learning and Personal/Political Transformation
- Chapter 8Learning Not to Belong
- Chapter 9Learning Sex Work in Brazil across Contexts of Continuity and Difference
- Chapter 10Learning to Become a Good Muslim
- Part IVContradictory Co-production of Everyday Life with Children
- Index
- References
Chapter 8 - Learning Not to Belong
Processes of Exclusion in Danish Schools
from Part III - Learning from the Margins in Cross-Contextual Struggles
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 August 2026
Book contents
- New Spaces for Difference
- New Spaces for Difference
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Cover Image
- Part ISpaces for Difference
- Part IILearning Differences in Contemporary Cultural Practices
- Part IIILearning from the Margins in Cross-Contextual Struggles
- Chapter 7Learning and Personal/Political Transformation
- Chapter 8Learning Not to Belong
- Chapter 9Learning Sex Work in Brazil across Contexts of Continuity and Difference
- Chapter 10Learning to Become a Good Muslim
- Part IVContradictory Co-production of Everyday Life with Children
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter explores processes of learning in everyday life from the point of view of children that participate from marginalized positions in school. The chapter analyzes how these marginalized positions develop over time through slopes of exclusion (Kousholt 2012). The slope of exclusion is an analytical concept formed by many years of theoretical and ethnographic work, as I moved in and across the different social practices of children’s everyday lives. The concept is meant to grasp social processes of exclusion and alienation produced over time and across contexts. It involves restrictive conditions and conflicts on many levels that interweave and produce a slippery slope of exclusion, where children end up giving up on their belonging with other children. The chapter shows how individualized understandings and explanations of children’s behavior displace problems outside of the school, limiting or preventing explorations of how different personal struggles are also connected to dealing with common matters in a contradictory school life.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- New Spaces for DifferenceCritical Studies of Learning Practices, pp. 185 - 210Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2026
References
Allerup, P. F., Langager, S. C. and Robenhagen, O. (2004) SFO under forandring: samordning med skolen, pædagogiske funktioner og pædagogmedhjælpernes opgaver [Changing After-School Programs: Coordination with Schools, Pedagogical Functions and the Tasks of Teaching Assistants]. København: Danmarks Pædagogiske Universitets Forlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andenæs, A. and Haavind, H. (2018) Sharing early care: Learning from practitioners. In Fleer, M. and van Oers, B. (eds.), International Handbook of Early Childhood Education. Vol. 2. Dordrecht: Springer, 1483–1502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axel, E. (2011) Conflictual cooperation. Nordic Psychology, 63(4), 56–78. https://doi.org/10.1027/1901-2276/a000045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axel, E. (2020) Distributing resources in a construction project: Conflictual co-operation about a common cause and its theoretical implications. Theory and Psychology, 30(3), 329–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354320919501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, R. J. (1971) Praxis and Action: Contemporary Philosophies of Human Activity. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brah, A. and Phoenix, A. (2004) Ain’t I a woman? Revisiting intersectionality. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 5(3), Article 8. https://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol5/iss3/8Google Scholar
Chaiklin, S., Hedegaard, M. and Jensen, U. J. (eds.) (1999) Activity Theory and Social Practice: Cultural-Historical Approaches. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
Dreier, O. (2008) Psychotherapy in Everyday Life. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dreier, O. (2009) Persons in structures of social practice. Theory and Psychology, 19(2), 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354309103539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreier, O. (2011) Personality and the conduct of everyday life. Nordic Psychology, 63(2), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1027/1901-2276/a000030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engsig, T. T. and Johnstone, C. J. (2015) Is there something rotten in the state of Denmark? The paradoxical policies of inclusive education – Lessons from Denmark. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 19(5), 469–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, M., Weis, L. and Powell, L. (1997) Communities of difference: A critical look at desegregated spaces created for and by youth. Harvard Educational Review, 67, 247–285. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.67.2.g683217368m50530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleer, M. and Hedegaard, M. (2010) Children’s development as participation in everyday practices across different institutions. Mind, Culture and Activity, 17(2), 149–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haavind, H. (2000) På jakt etter kjønnede betydninger. In Haavind, H. (ed.), Kön och tolkning. Metodiska möjligheter i kvalitativ forskning [Gender and Interpretation: Methodical Possibilities in Qualitative Research]. Oslo, Norway: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag, 7–59.Google Scholar
Haavind, H. (2003) Masculinity by rule-breaking: Cultural contestations in the transitional move from being a child to being a young male. NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 11(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740310002941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haug, W. F. (2001) From Marx to Gramsci, from Gramsci to Marx: Historical materialism and the philosophy of praxis. Rethinking Marxism, 13(1), 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauge, M. I. and Haavind, H. (2011) Boys’ bodies and the constitution of adolescent masculinities. Sport, Education and Society, 16(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2011.531958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedegaard, M., Aronsson, K., Højholt, C. and Ulvik, O. S. (2018) Children, Childhood, and Everyday Life: Children’s Perspectives. 2nd ed. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedegaard, M. and Edwards, A. (2014) Transitions and children’s learning. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 3(3), 185–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2014.02.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Højholt, C. (2008) Participation in communities: Living and learning across different contexts. ARECE: Journal of Australian Research in Early Childhood Education, 15(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
Højholt, C. (2011) Cooperation between professionals in educational psychology: Children’s specific problems are connected to general problems in relation to taking part. In Daniels, H. and Hedegaard, M. (eds.), Vygotsky and Special Needs Education: Rethinking Support for Children and Schools. London: Continuum Press, 67–86.Google Scholar
Højholt, C. and Kousholt, D. (2014) Participant observations of children’s communities—Exploring subjective aspects of social practice. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(3), 316–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2014.908989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Højholt, C. and Kousholt, D. (2018) Children participating and developing agency in and across various social practices. In Fleer, M. and van Oers, B. (eds.), International Handbook of Early Childhood Education, vol. 2. Dordrecht: Springer, 1581–1598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Højholt, C. and Kousholt, D. (2020) Dialectic and conflicts – Researching school as conflictual social practice. Theory and Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354320919501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Højholt, C. and Larsen, M. R. (2021) Conflicts, situated inequality and politics of everyday life. Culture and Psychology, 27(4), 591–611. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X21989950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, D. and Lave, J. (eds.) (2001) History in Person: Enduring Struggles, Contentious Practice, Intimate Identities. Oxford: James Currey.Google Scholar
Holloway, J. and Hamre, B. (2018) School reforms, market logic, and the politics of inclusion in the United States and Denmark. In Hamre, B., Morin, A. and Ydesen, C. (eds.), Testing and Inclusive Schooling: International Challenges and Opportunities. London: Routledge, 105–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holzkamp, K. (2013) Psychology: Social self-understanding on the reasons for action in the conduct of everyday life. In Schraube, E. and Osterkamp, U. (eds.), Psychology from the Standpoint of the Subject: Selected Writings of Klaus Holzkamp. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 233–341.Google Scholar
Hviid, P. (2008) Next year we are small, right? Different times in children’s development. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 23(2), 183–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knage, F. S. and Kousholt, D. (2023) Langvarigt bekymrende skolefravær [Long-term concerning school absenteeism]. Aarhus Universitets forlag. Pædagogisk Indblik Nr. 21 (e-book)Google Scholar
Kousholt, D. (2011) Researching family through the everyday lives of children across home and day care in Denmark. Ethos, 39(1), 98–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1352.2010.01173.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kousholt, D. (2012) Børnefællesskaber og udsatte positioner i SFO: inklusion og fritidspædagogik [Children’s communities and vulnerable positions in after-school centers]. In Hviid, P. and Højholt, C. (eds.), Fritidspædagogik og børneliv [Leisure Time Pedagogy and Child Life]. 1st ed. Hans Reitzels Forlag, 192–214.Google Scholar
Kousholt, D. (2015) “An old lady among the wild boys”: Examining the work of gender in research practices. Paper presented at the conference The Work of Gender in the Lives of Children and Young People, Tromsø, October 2015. https://pure.au.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/372426759/An_old_lady_among_the_wild_boys_revideret2.pdfGoogle Scholar
Kousholt, D. (2016) Collaborative research with children: Exploring contradictory conditions of conduct of everyday life. In Schraube, E. and Højholt, C. (eds.), Psychology and the Conduct of Everyday Life. London: Routledge, 241–258.Google Scholar
Kousholt, D. (2018) Family problems: Exploring dilemmas and complexities of organizing everyday family life. In Aronsson, K., Hedegaard, M., Højholt, C. and Ulvik, O. S. (eds.), Children, Childhood and Everyday Life: Children’s Perspectives. 2nd ed. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing Inc., 113–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kousholt, D. (2019) Children’s everyday transitions: Children’s engagements across life contexts. In Hedegaard, M. and Fleer, M. (eds.), Children’s Transitions in Everyday Life and Institutions. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 145–165.Google Scholar
Kousholt, D. and Morin, A (2023). Samarbejde mellem PPR og skole [Collaboration between EPS and School]. Pædagogisk Indblik nr 22. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
Kristensen, K. L. and Mørck, L. L. (2016) ADHD medication and social self-understanding: Social practice research with a first grade in a Danish primary school. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-014-0226-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, T. C., Holloway, J. and Hamre, B. F. (2019) How is an inclusive agenda in an excluding education system: The Danish dilemma. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(10), 1049–1064. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1626497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lave, J. (2011) Apprenticeship in Critical Ethnographic Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lave, J. (2019) Learning and Everyday Life: Access, Participation, and Changing Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, C. D. (2023) Anderledes end de andre? – En analyse af skolevanskeligheder og betingelser for at håndtere forskellighed i skolens hverdagsliv [Different Than the Others? An Analysis of School Difficulties and Conditions for Dealing with Differences in the Everyday Life of the School]. PhD thesis, Aarhus University.Google Scholar
McDermott, R. (1993) The acquisition of a child by a learning disability. In Chaiklin, S. and Lave, J. (eds.), Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context. New York: Cambridge University Press, 269–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, R., Goldman, S. and Varenne, H. (2006) The cultural work of learning disabilities. Educational Researcher, 35(6), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035006012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehan, H. (1986) Handicapping the Handicapped. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morin, A. (2008) Learning together: A child perspective on educational arrangements of special education. Journal of Australian Research in Early Childhood Education, 15(1), 27–37.Google Scholar
Ollman, B. (2015) Marxism and the philosophy of internal relations; or, How to replace the mysterious “paradox” with “contradictions” that can be studied and resolved. Capital and Class, 39(1), 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osterkamp, U. (2009) Knowledge and practice in critical psychology. Theory and Psychology, 19(2), 167–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Røn Larsen, M. (2018) Paradoxes of inclusion: Administrative procedures and children’s everyday lives. In Hedegaard, M., Aronsson, K., Højholt, C. and Ulvik, O. S. (eds.), Children, Childhood, and Everyday Life: Children’s Perspectives. 2nd ed. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing, 129–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Røn Larsen, M. (2019) Interdisciplinary collaboration and conflict concerning children in difficulties: Conditions, procedures and politics of everyday life in school. Annual Review of Critical Psychology (Online), 16, 832–848. https://thediscourseunit.files.wordpress.com/2019/12/0832.pdfGoogle Scholar
Schraube, E. and Højholt, C. (eds.) (2016) Psychology and the Conduct of Everyday Life. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schraube, E. and Osterkamp, U. (eds.) (2013) Psychology from the Standpoint of the Subject: Selected Writings of Klaus Holzkamp. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanek, A. H. (2014) Communities of children: Participation and its meaning for learning. International Research in Early Childhood Education, 5(1), 139–154.Google Scholar
Stetsenko, A. (2008) From relational ontology to transformative activist stance on development and learning: Expanding Vygotsky’s (CHAT) project. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3, 471–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stetsenko, A. (2016) The Transformative Mind: Expanding Vygotsky’s Approach to Development and Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorne, B. (1993) Gender Play: Girls and Boys in School. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.0 A
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The HTML of this chapter conforms to version 2.0 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), ensuring core accessibility principles are addressed and meets the basic
(A)
level of WCAG compliance, addressing essential accessibility barriers.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
Structural and Technical Features
ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.