Book contents
- Organization as Time
- Organization as Time
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Organization as Time
- Part I The Politics of Time: Ontologies and Metaphysics of Organization as Time
- Part II Re-orienting Critique in Organization Studies? Exploring Jointly Time and Politics
- Part III New Ways of Organizing Work, Digitality and the Politics of Time
- Part IV History and Duration: Making Things Last, Enduring Politics and Organizing
- 14 Times Alla Turca E Franga
- 15 Temporality and Institutional Maintenance
- 16 A Time for Justice?
- 17 Organizational Memory as Technology
- Conclusion: Time and Political Organizing
- Index
- References
17 - Organizational Memory as Technology
from Part IV - History and Duration: Making Things Last, Enduring Politics and Organizing
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 June 2023
Book contents
- Organization as Time
- Organization as Time
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Organization as Time
- Part I The Politics of Time: Ontologies and Metaphysics of Organization as Time
- Part II Re-orienting Critique in Organization Studies? Exploring Jointly Time and Politics
- Part III New Ways of Organizing Work, Digitality and the Politics of Time
- Part IV History and Duration: Making Things Last, Enduring Politics and Organizing
- 14 Times Alla Turca E Franga
- 15 Temporality and Institutional Maintenance
- 16 A Time for Justice?
- 17 Organizational Memory as Technology
- Conclusion: Time and Political Organizing
- Index
- References
Summary
How does organizational memory function in the context of digital computing? Organizational memory studies are rooted in information systems approaches that emphasize data storage and retrieval. For some time, however, such technical approaches have become replaced by studies of the human processes involved in remembering, and in social influences affecting the reframing of memories in light of collective influences. However, this analytical emphasis on human (individual and social) aspects stands in contrast with the growth of the use of information technology in organizations. Computers and networked devices not only send, receive, process and store massive amounts of communication, they also automatically generate data through sensors, cameras and algorithms. Moreover, 21st century media are focussed on feeding information back to the user (or organizational agent) to influence their choices, decisions and behaviour in real time. In this chapter we seek to contemplate how organizational memory works in such contemporary technical contexts. Drawing specifically on the media theorists Bernard Stiegler and Mark Hansen we contrast analogue and mechanical forms of memory from digital, computing based ones.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Organization as TimeTechnology, Power and Politics, pp. 375 - 396Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Alombert, A. & Krzykawski, M. (2021). Lexicon of Internation: Introduction to the Concepts of Bernard Stiegler and the Internation Collective. In Stiegler, B. (ed.), Bifurcate: There Is No Alternative (pp. 305–30). London: Open Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Anders, G. (2016). On Promethean Shame. In Müller, C. J. (ed.), Prometheanism. Technology, Digital Culture and Human Obsolescence (pp. 29–96). London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Anteby, M. & Molnár, V. (2012). Collective memory meets organizational identity: Remembering to forget in a firm’s rhetorical history. Academy of Management Journal, 55(3), 515–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskerville, R. L., Myers, M. D. & Yoo, Y. (2020). Digital first: The ontological reversal and new challenges for information systems research. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 44(2), 509–23.Google Scholar
Beverungen, A. & Lange, A. C. (2018). Cognition in high-frequency trading: The costs of consciousness and the limits of automation. Theory, Culture and Society, 35, 75–95.Google Scholar
Blagoev, B., Felten, S. & Kahn, R. (2018). The career of a catalogue: Organizational memory, materiality and the dual nature of the past at the British Museum (1970–Today). Organization Studies, 39(12), 1757–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boland, R. J., Lyytinen, K. & Yoo, Y. (2007). Wakes of innovation in project networks: The case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering, and construction. Organization Science, 18(4), 631–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandon, D. P. & Hollingshead, A. B. (2004). Transactive memory systems in organizations: Matching tasks, expertise, and people. Organization Science, 15(6), 633–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connerton, P. (1989). How Societies Remember. Cambridge, UK & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coraiola, D. M. & Murcia, M. J. (2019). From organizational learning to organizational mnemonics: Redrawing the boundaries of the field. Management Learning, 51(2), 227–40.Google Scholar
D’Adderio, L. (2003). Configuring software, reconfiguring memories: The influence of integrated systems on the reproduction of knowledge and routines. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(2), 321–50.Google Scholar
De Vaujany, F-X. & Mitev, N. (2017). The post-Macy paradox, information management and organising: Good intentions and a road to hell? Culture and Organization, 23(5), 379–407.Google Scholar
Ernst, W. (2013). From media history to Zeitkritik. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(6), 132–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faulkner, P. & Runde, J. (2019). Theorizing the digital object. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 43(4), 1278–302.Google Scholar
Fiedler, M. & Welpe, I. (2010). How do organizations remember? The influence of organizational structure on organizational memory. Organization Studies, 31(4), 381–407.Google Scholar
Foroughi, H., Coraiola, D. M., Rintamäki, J., Mena, S. & Foster, W. M. (2020). Organizational Memory Studies. Organization Studies, 41(12), 1725–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, W. M., Coraiola, D. M., Suddaby, R., Kroezen, J. & Chandler, D. (2017). The strategic use of historical narratives: A theoretical framework. Business History, 59(8), 1176–1200.Google Scholar
Foster, W. M., Suddaby, R., Minkus, A. & Wiebe, E. (2011). History as social memory assets: The example of Tim Hortons. Management & Organizational History, 6(1), 101–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galloway, A. A. & Thacker, E. (2007). The Exploit: A Theory of Networks. London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Halbwachs, M. (1992). On Collective Memory. Trans. L. Coser. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, M. B. (2014). Feed-Forward: On the Future of Twenty-First-Century Media. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, M. B. (2017). Bernard Stiegler, philosopher of desire? Boundary 2, 44(1), 167–91.Google Scholar
Hatch, M. J. & Schultz, M. (2017). Toward a theory of using history authentically: Historicizing in the Carlsberg Group. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(4), 657–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayles, N. K. (2017). Unthought: The Power of the Cognitive Nonconscious. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hui, Y. (2016). On the Synthesis of Social Memories. In Blom, I., Lundemo, T. & Røssaak (eds), E., Memory in Motion: Archives, Technology, and the Social (pp. 307–27). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Humphries, C. & Smith, A. C. T. (2014). Talking objects: Towards a post-social research framework for exploring object narratives. Organization, 21(4), 477–94.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1991). On the Phenomenology of the Consciousness of Internal Time (1893–1917). Trans. J. B. Brough. London: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kallinikos, J. & Mariategui, J-C. (2011). Video as digital object: Production and distribution of video content in the internet media ecosystem. The Information Society, 27(5), 281–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landsberg, A. (2004). Prosthetic Memory: The Transformation of American Remembrance in the Age of Mass Culture. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lange, A.-C., Lenglet, M. & Seyfert, R. (2018). On studying algorithms ethnographically: Making sense of objects of ignorance. Organization, 26(4), 598–617.Google Scholar
Lewis, K. & Herndon, B. (2011). Transactive memory systems: Current issues and future research directions. Organization Science, 22(5), 1254–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mena, S., Rintamaki, J., Fleming, P. & Spicer, A. (2016). On the forgetting of corporate irresponsibility. Academy of Management Review, 41(4), 720–38.Google Scholar
Ocasio, W., Mauskapf, M. & Steele, C. W. (2016). History, society, and institutions: The role of collective memory in the emergence and evolution of societal logics. Academy of Management Review, 41(4), 676–99.Google Scholar
Orlikowski, W. J. & Scott, S. V. (2015). The algorithm and the crowd: Considering the materiality of service innovation. MIS Quarterly, 39, 201–16.Google Scholar
Rowlinson, M., Booth, C., Clark, P., Delahaye, A. & Procter, S. (2010). Social remembering and organizational memory. Organization Studies, 31(1), 69–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapir, A. (2020). Mythologizing the story of a scientific invention: Constructing the legitimacy of research commercialization. Organization Studies, 41(6), 799–820. doi:10.1177/0170840618814575Google Scholar
Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics and Time, 1: The Fault of Epimetheus. Trans. R. Beardsworth & G. Collins. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Stiegler, B. (2009). Technics and Time, 2: Disorientation. Trans. S. Barker. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Stiegler, B. (2010a). For a New Critique of Political Economy. Trans. D. Ross. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Stiegler, B. (2011). Technics and Time, 3: Cinematic Time and the Question of Malaise. Trans. S. Barker. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Stiegler, B. (2016a). The Age of Disruption: Technology and Madness in Computational Capitalism. Trans. D. Ross. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Stiegler, B. (2016b). Automatic Society, Vol. 1: The Future of Work. Trans. D. Ross. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Stiegler, B. (2020). The Nanjing Lectures 2016–2019. Trans. D. Ross. London: Open Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Walsh, J. P. & Ungson, G. R. (1991). Organizational memory. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 57–91.Google Scholar
Yoo, Y. (2010). Computing in everyday life: A call for research on experiential computing. MIS Quarterly, 34(2), 213–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuboff, S. (2018). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
Zundel, M., Holt, R. & Popp, A. (2016). Using history in the creation of organizational identity. Management & Organizational History, 11(2), 211–35.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.