23 - Sources and sinks: what is the reality?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2011
Summary
We consider four “realities” that may affect the usefulness of source–sink theory and thinking as applied to conservation and resource management. First, documenting source–sink systems requires detailed information on demography, dispersal, and habitat selection – information that is hard to come by. Second, source and sink patches are embedded in heterogeneous landscape mosaics, in which the details of spatial relationships are important. Third, source–sink systems are dynamic: what is a source or a sink can change with variations in regional population abundance or environmental conditions. And fourth, considering source–sink systems at too fine a spatial or temporal scale may artificially truncate their dynamics, while viewing them at too broad a scale may obscure or average away the critical interactions between sources and sinks; source–sink dynamics are scale-dependent. The upshot of these realities is that populations in different parts of a landscape may have quite different dynamics, which may change with time or changes in scale. Conserving or managing such populations requires direct or indirect information about landscape-specific demography and dispersal. It also means that protected areas should be established and managed with regard to current and future source–sink dynamics, including adequate landscape heterogeneity at a sufficient scale to allow source–sink dynamics to play out.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Sources, Sinks and Sustainability , pp. 507 - 519Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011
References
, , , , and (2001). Effective size and genetic structure of a Piute ground squirrel population (Spermophilus mollis). Canadian Journal of Zoology 79: 26–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2006). Connectivity Conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2004). The effect of natal experience on habitat preferences. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 411–416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2009). Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 40: 677–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2000). Understanding the role of sink patches in source–sink metapopulations: reed warbler in an agricultural landscape. Conservation Biology 14: 1881–1892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2005). Spatial Analysis: A Guide for Ecologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambrige, UK.Google Scholar
, , and (1996). Demographic characteristics and trends of northern spotted owl populations in northwestern California. In Demography of the Northern Spotted Owl (, , and , eds.). Studies in Avian Biology No. 17, Allen Press, Lawrence, KS:83–91.Google Scholar
and (1969). On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. I. Theoretical development. Acta Biotheoretica 19: 16–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2001). The role of sink to source re-colonisation in the population dynamics of insects living in unstable habitats: an example of terrestrial chironomids. Oikos 93: 50–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2006). Integrating individual movement behavior into dispersal functions. Journal of Theoretical Biology 245: 601–609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (2006). Corridor Ecology: The Science and Practice of Linking Landscapes for Biodiversity Conservation. Island Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
, and (2003). Impacts of environmental variability in open populations and communities: “inflation” in sink environments. Theoretical Population Biology 64: 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1960). Innate and environmental dispersal of individual vertebrates. American Midland Naturalist 63: 152–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1957). Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 22: 415–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2001). Condition-dependent dispersal. In Dispersal (, , and , eds.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK: 203–216.Google Scholar
(1983). No park is an island: increase in interference from outside as park size decreases. Oikos 41: 402–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Jr. (1975). The role of dispersal in the demography of small mammals. In Small Mammals: Their Productivity and Population Dynamics (, and , eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK: 103–128.Google Scholar
(1980). Diffusion and Ecological Problems: Mathematical Models. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
(1988). Sources, sinks, and population regulation. American Naturalist 132: 652–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000). On the relationship between niche and distribution. Ecology Letters 3: 349–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1991). Sources, sinks, and habitat selection: a landscape perspective on population dynamics. American Naturalist 137(Suppl.): S50–S66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2001). What are we protecting? The United States Conservation Portfolio. Conservation Biology in Practice 2: 18–19.Google Scholar
(1998). Quantitative Analysis of Movement: Measuring and Modeling Population Redistribution in Animals and Plants. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
(1983). Density as a misleading indicator of habitat quality. Journal of Wildlife Management 47: 893–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (1997). Effects of drought and prolonged winter on Townsend’s ground squirrel demography in shrubsteppe habitats. Ecological Monographs 67: 295–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1995). Sources, sinks and pseudo-sinks. Journal of Animal Ecology 64: 126–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001). The landscape context of dispersal. In Dispersal: Individual, Population, and Community (, , and , eds.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK: 96–109.Google Scholar
and (eds.) (2005). Issues and Perspectives in Landscape Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.CrossRef
, , and (1993). Ecological mechanisms and landscape ecology. Oikos 66: 369–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (2009). Niches, models, and climate change: assessing the assumptions and uncertainties. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(Suppl. 2): 19729–19736.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (2006). Post-fledging survival of northern goshawks: the importance of prey abundance, weather, and dispersal. Ecological Applications 16: 406–418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.