Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T11:58:07.679Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - V_YesNo v1.0

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2026

Paul Meara
Affiliation:
Swansea University
Imma Miralpeix
Affiliation:
Universitat de Barcelona
Get access

Summary

Introduction

V_YesNo is based on the Eurocentres Vocabulary Size Test (EVST; Meara & Jones, 1990), one of the very first programs to come out of the vocabulary research group that developed at Birkbeck College London during the 1980s. The program grew out of a need for some ‘quick and dirty’ tests that could be used to efficiently describe the level of proficiency of L2 speakers taking part in experimental studies. At the time we developed EVST, there were no standard tests of this type. People usually described their experimental participants in terms of how many years of study they had completed, or by using ill-defined descriptions like ‘beginner’ or ‘upper intermediate’. These terms were useful for broadly categorising participants, but they tended to mean different things in different contexts, and were not very useful for discriminating between students who were formally at the same level, but had very different levels of proficiency.

The original EVST program appeared to be a radically innovative approach to vocabulary testing in an L2 at the time it appeared, although it actually borrowed heavily from a methodology which had previously been used by Anderson and Freebody (1981) to test vocabulary in L1 speakers. In reality, the idea that vocabulary might be a good surrogate measure for overall proficiency in a foreign language was not as innovative as it appeared. The idea first crops up in a series of papers by Vivian Henmon, published in The Journal of Educational Psychology early in the 20th century (Henmon, 1917, 1920). Henmon’s work dealt with Latin, but the idea that it might also work for modern foreign languages surfaced again in a thesis by Einar Ryden, briefly reported in an article in The Journal of Educational Psychology in 1948. Ryden did not use imaginary words as a way of correcting for guessing: that idea was sketched out by John Higgins and reported in a paper that appeared in 1995, but was actually based on research carried out in the 1970s (Higgins, 1995).

Information

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×