Aarts, B. (1992) Small Clauses in English: The Nonverbal Types, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.
Abeillé, A. and Borsley, R. D. (2006) ‘Comparative correlatives and parameters’, ms. University of Essex.
Abels, K. (2003) Successive-Cyclicity, Anti-Locality and Adposition Stranding, PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Abney, S. P. (1987) The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect, PhD dissertation, MIT.
Adger, D. (2003) Core Syntax: A Minimalist Approach, Oxford University Press.
Adger, D. and Ramchand, G. (2005) ‘Merge and Move: Wh-dependencies revisited’, Linguistic Inquiry 36: 161–93.
Afarli, T. A. (1989) ‘Passive in Norwegian and in English’, Linguistic Inquiry 20: 101–8.
Agbayani, B. (2000) ‘Wh-subjects in English and the Vacuous Movement Hypothesis’, Linguistic Inquiry 31: 703–13.
Agbayani, B. (2006) ‘Pied-piping, feature movement and wh-subjects’, in Cheng and Corver 2006, pp. 71–93.
Agüero-Bautista, C. (2007) ‘Diagnosing cyclicity in Sluicing’, Linguistic Inquiry 38: 413–43.
Aissen, J. (1996) ‘Pied-piping, abstract agreement and functional projections in Tzotzil’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31: 703–13.
Akiyama, M. (2004) ‘Multiple nominative constructions in Japanese and Economy’, Linguistic Inquiry 35: 671–83.
Akmajian, A. and Heny, F. (1975) An Introduction to the Principles of Transformational Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Alexiadou, A. (1997) Adverb Placement: A Case Study in Antisymmetric Syntax, Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Alexiadou, A. and Anagnostopoulou, E. (1998) ‘Parameterizing AGR: word order, V-movement and EPP checking’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16: 491–539.
Alexiadou, A. and Anagnostopoulou, E. (2001) ‘The subject-in-situ generalization and the role of case in driving computations’, Linguistic Inquiry 32: 193–231.
Alexiadou, A., Law, P., Meinunger, A. and Wilder, C. (2000) The Syntax of Relative Clauses, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Alexiadou, A. and Wilder, C. (eds.) (1998) Possessors, Predicates and Movement in the Determiner Phrase, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Alexopoulou, T. and Kolliakou, D. (2002) ‘On linkhood, topicalisation and clitic left dislocation’, Journal of Linguistics 38: 193–245.
Alhorais, N. (2007) ‘The categorial status of the small clause: a minimalist approach’, ms. University of Newcastle.
Almeida, D. A. de A. and Yoshida, M. (2007) ‘A problem for the preposition stranding generalization’, Linguistic Inquiry 38: 349–62.
Alrenga, P. (2005) ‘A sentential subject asymmetry in English and its implications for complement selection’, Syntax 8: 175–207.
Anagnostopoulou, E. (2003) The Syntax of Ditransitives, Mouton de Gruyter, The Hague.
Anderson, S. R and Lightfoot, D. W (2002) The Language Organ: Linguistics as Cognitive Physiology, Cambridge University Press.
Antony, L. M. and Hornstein, N. (2003) Chomsky and his Critics, Blackwell, Oxford.
Aoun, J., Benmamoun, E. and Sportiche, D. (1994) ‘Agreement and conjunction in some varieties of Arabic’, Linguistic Inquiry 25: 195–220.
Authier, J.-M. (1989) ‘Arbitrary null objects and unselective binding’, in Jaeggli, O. and Safir, K. (eds.) The Null Subject Parameter, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 45–67.
Authier, J.-M. (1991) ‘V-governed expletives, case theory and the projection principle’, Linguistic Inquiry 22: 721–40.
Authier, J.-M. and Reed, L. (2005) ‘The diverse nature of non-interrogative Wh’, Linguistic Inquiry 36: 635–47.
Bach, E. (1977) ‘Review of Paul M. Postal On Raising’, Language 53: 621–54.
Baker, M. (1988) Incorporation, University of Chicago Press.
Baker, M. (1997) ‘Thematic roles and syntactic structures’, in Haegeman, L. (ed.) Elements of Grammar, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 73–137.
Baker, M., Johnson, K., and Roberts, I. (1989) ‘Passive arguments raised’, Linguistic Inquiry 20: 219–51.
Baltin, M. (2002) ‘Movement to the higher V is remnant movement’, Linguistic Inquiry 33: 653–9.
Baltin, M. and Collins, C. (eds.) (2001) The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, Blackwell, Oxford.
Baltin, M. and Postal, P. M. (1996) ‘More on the Inadequacy of Reanalysis Hypotheses’, Linguistic Inquiry 27: 127–45.
Barbosa, P. (1995) Null Subjects, PhD dissertation, MIT.
Barbosa, P. (2000) ‘Clitics: a window into the Null Subject Property’, in Costa, J. (ed.) Portuguese Syntax: Comparative Studies, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 31–93.
Barbosa, P. (2007) ‘Two kinds of subject pro’, ms. Universidade do Minho.
Barbosa, P., Duarte, M. E. L. and Kato, M. A. (2005) ‘Null subjects in European and Brasilian Portuguese’, Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 4: 11–52.
Barss, A. (2001) ‘Syntactic reconstruction effects’ in Baltin and Collins 2001, pp. 670–96.
Barss, A. and Lasnik, H. (1986) ‘A note on anaphora and double objects’, Linguistic Inquiry 17: 347–54.
Basilico, D. (2003) ‘The topic of small clauses’, Linguistic Inquiry 34: 1–35.
Beck, S. and Johnson, K. (2004) ‘Double objects again’, Linguistic Inquiry 35: 97–124.
Becker, M. (2006) ‘There began to be a learnability puzzle’, Linguistic Inquiry 37: 441–56.
Bejar, S. and Massam, D. (1999) ‘Multiple case checking’, Syntax 2: 65–79.
Belletti, A. (1990) Generalized Verb Movement: Aspects of Verb Syntax, Rosenberg and Sellier, Turin.
Belletti, A. and Rizzi, L. (1988) ‘Psych-verbs and θ-theory’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 291–352.
Benmamoun, E. (2006) ‘Licensing configurations: the puzzle of head negative polarity items’, Linguistic Inquiry 37: 141–9.
Bernstein, J. B. (1993) Topics in the Syntax of Nominal Structures across Romance, PhD dissertation, City University of New York.
Bernstein, J. B. (2001) ‘The DP hypothesis: identifying clausal properties in the nominal domain’, in Baltin and Collins 2001, pp. 536–61.
Bhatt, R. and Pancheva, R. (2004) ‘Late merger of degree clauses’, Linguistic Inquiry 35: 1–45.
Bissell-Doggett, T. (2004) All Things being Unequal: Locality in Movement, PhD dissertation, MIT.
Bloomfield, L. (1935) Language, George Allen and Unwin, London.
Bobaljik, J. (1995) Morphosyntax: The Syntax of Verbal Inflection, PhD dissertation, MIT.
Bobaljik, J. (2000) ‘The rich agreement hypothesis in review’, draft manuscript, McGill University (www.msgill.ca/Linguistics/faculty/bobaljik/).
Bobaljik, J. (2002) ‘A-chains at the PF-interface: copies and “covert” movement’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 197–267.
Boeckx, C. (2000) ‘A note on Contraction’, Linguistic Inquiry 31: 357–66.
Boeckx, C. (2001) ‘Scope reconstruction and A-movement’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 503–48.
Boeckx, C. (2003a) Islands and Chains: Resumption as Stranding, Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Boeckx, C. (2003b) ‘(In)direct binding’, Syntax 6: 213–36.
Boeckx, C. (2005) ‘A gap in the ECM paradigm’, Linguistic Inquiry 36: 437–41.
Boeckx, C. (2007) Understanding Minimalist Syntax, Blackwell, Oxford.
Boeckx, C. and Hornstein, N. (2003) ‘Reply to control is not movement’, Linguistic Inquiry 34: 269–80.
Boeckx, C. and Hornstein, N. (2004) ‘Movement under control’, Linguistic Inquiry 35: 431–52.
Boeckx, C. and Hornstein, N. (2006a) ‘The virtues of control as movement’, Syntax 9: 118–30.
Boeckx, C. and Hornstein, N. (2006b) ‘Control in Icelandic and theories of control’, Linguistic Inquiry 37: 591–606.
Boeckx, C. and Stjepanović, S. (2001) ‘Head-ing towards PF’, Linguistic Inquiry 32: 345–55.
Borer, H. (1993) ‘The projection of arguments’, in Benedicto, E. and Runner, J. (eds.) Functional Projections UMass Occasional Papers 17, GLSA publications, Amherst, MA.
Borroff, M. L. (2006) ‘Degree phrase inversion in the scope of negation’, Linguistic Inquiry 37: 514–21.
Borsley, R. D. (1992) ‘More on the difference between English restrictive and non-restrictive relative clauses’, Journal of Linguistics 28: 139–48.
Borsley, R. D. (1997) ‘Relative clauses and the theory of phrase structure’, Linguistic Inquiry 28: 629–47.
Borsley, R. D. (2007) ‘On so-called transitive expletives in Belfast English’, unpublished paper, University of Essex.
Borsley, R. and Jaworska, E. (1998) ‘A note on prepositions and case-marking in Polish’, Linguistic Inquiry 19: 685–91.
Borsley, R., Rivero, M. L., and Stephens, J. (1996) ‘Long head movement in Breton’, in Borsley, R. and Roberts, I. (eds.) The Syntax of the Celtic Languages: A Comparative Perspective, Cambridge University Press, pp. 53–74.
Bošković, Z. (1997) ‘On certain violations of the superiority condition, AgrO and economy of derivation’, Journal of Linguistics 33: 227–54.
Bošković, Z. (2001) On the Nature of the Syntax–Phonology Interface: Cliticization and Related Phenomena, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Bošković, Z. (2002a) ‘On multiple wh-fronting’, Linguistic Inquiry 33: 351–83.
Bošković, Z. (2002b) ‘A-Movement and the EPP’, Syntax 5: 167–218.
Bošković, Z. (2004) ‘Topicalization, focalization, lexical insertion and scrambling’, Linguistic Inquiry 35: 613–38.
Bošković, Z. (2005) ‘On the locality of left branch extraction and the structure of NP’, Studia Linguistica 59: 1–45.
Bošković, Z. and Lasnik, H. (2003) ‘On the distribution of null complementisers’, Linguistic Inquiry 34: 527–46.
Bowerman, M. (1982) ‘Evaluating competing linguistic models with language acquisition data: implications of developmental errors with causative verbs’, Quaderni di Semantica 3: 5–66.
Bowerman, M. (1988) ‘The “no negative evidence” problem: How do children avoid an overly general grammar?’, in Hawkins, J. (ed.) Explaining Language Universals, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 73–101.
Bowers, J. (1973) Grammatical Relations, PhD dissertation, MIT.
Bowers, J. (1993) ‘The syntax of predication’, Linguistic Inquiry 24: 591–656.
Bowers, J. (2001) ‘Predication’, in Baltin and Collins 2001, pp. 299–333.
Bowers, J. (2002) ‘Transitivity’, Linguistic Inquiry 33: 183–224.
Braine, M. D. S. (1971) ‘Three suggestions regarding grammatical analyses of children's language’, in Ferguson, C. A. and Slobin, D. I. (eds.) Studies of Child Language Development, Holt Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp. 421–9.
Branigan, P. (1992) Subjects and Complementisers, PhD dissertation, MIT.
Branigan, P. (2005) ‘The phase theoretic basis for subject-aux inversion’, unpublished paper, Memorial University (www.ucs.mun.ca/~branigan/papers)
Branigan, P. and MacKenzie, M. (2002) ‘Altruism, Ā-movement and object agreement in Innu-aimûn’, Linguistic Inquiry 33: 385–407.
Bresnan, J. (1970) ‘On complementizers: toward a syntactic theory of complement types’, Foundations of Language 6: 297–321.
Bresnan, J. (1972) Theory of Complementation in English Syntax, PhD dissertation, MIT (published as Bresnan 1979).
Bresnan, J. (1976) ‘Nonarguments for raising’, Linguistic Inquiry 7: 265–99.
Bresnan, J. (1979) Theory of Complementation in English Syntax, Garland, New York (published version of Bresnan 1972).
Bresnan, J. (1994) ‘Locative inversion and the architecture of Universal Grammar’, Language 70: 72–131.
Brody, M. (1995) A Radically Minimalist Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Broekhuis, H. (2006) ‘Extraction from subjects: some remarks on Chomsky's “On Phases”’, in Broekhuis, H., Corver, N. and Huybreghts, R. (eds.) Organising Grammar, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 59–68.
Brown, K. (1991) ‘Double modals in Hawick Scots’, in Trudgill, P. and Chambers, J. K. (eds.) Dialects of English, Longman, London, pp. 74–103.
Brown, R., Cazden, C. and Bellugi, U. (1968) ‘The child's grammar from I to III’, in J. P. Hill (ed.) Minnesota Symposium on Child Developmentvol. II, pp. 28–73.
Brown, R. and Hanlon, C. (1970) ‘Derivational complexity and order of acquisition in child speech’, in Hayes, J. R. (ed.) Cognition and the Development of Language, Wiley, New York, pp. 11–53.
Bruening, B. (2001) Syntax at the Edge: Cross-clausal Phenomena and the Syntax of Passamaquoddy, PhD dissertation, MIT.
Bruening, B. (2004) ‘Two types of wh-scope-marking in Passamaquoddy’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 229–305.
Bruening, B. (2006) ‘Differences between the wh-scope-marking and wh-copy constructions in Passamaquoddy’, Linguistic Inquiry 37: 25–49.
Bruening, B. (2007) ‘Wh-in-situ does not correlate with wh-indefinites or question particles’, Linguistic Inquiry 38: 139–66.
Büring, D. (2005) Binding Theory, Cambridge University Press.
Burton, S. and Grimshaw, J. (1992) ‘Coordination and VP-internal subjects’, Linguistic Inquiry 23: 305–13.
Burzio, L. (1986) Italian Syntax, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Caponigro, I. and Schütze, C. T. (2003) ‘Parameterizing passive participle movement’, Linguistic Inquiry 34: 293–308.
Cardinaletti, A. and Guasti, M. T. (eds.) (1995) Syntax and Semantics vol. XXVIII: Small Clauses, Academic Press, New York.
Cardinaletti, A. and Starke, M. (1999) ‘The typology of structural deficiency: a case study of the three classes of pronouns’, in Riemsdijk, H. (ed.) Clitics in the Languages of Europe, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 145–233.
Carrier, J. and Randall, J. H. (1992) ‘The argument structure and syntactic structure of resultatives’, Linguistic Inquiry 23: 173–234.
Carlson, K., Dickey, M. W. and Kennedy, C. (2005) ‘Structural economy in the processing and representation of gapping sentences’, Syntax 8: 208–28.
Carnie, A. (1995) Nonverbal Predication and Head Movement, PhD dissertation, MIT.
Carstens, V. (2000) ‘Concord in Minimalist Theory’, Linguistic Inquiry 31: 319–55.
Carstens, V. (2001) ‘Multiple agreement and case deletion: against φ-(in)completeness’, Syntax 4: 147–63.
Carstens, V. (2003) ‘Rethinking complementiser agreement: agree with a case-checked goal’, Linguistic Inquiry 34: 393–412.
Cecchetto, C. and Oniga, R. (2004) ‘A challenge to null case theory’, Linguistic Inquiry 35: 141–9.
Cheng, L. (1997) On the Typology of Wh-Questions, Garland, New York.
Cheng, L. and Corver, N. (eds.) (2006) Wh-Movement: Moving On, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Cheng, L. and Rooryck, J. (2000) ‘Licensing Wh-in-situ’, Syntax 3: 1–19.
Chiba, S. (1987) Present Subjunctives in Present-Day English, Shinozaki Shorin, Tokyo.
Chierchia, G. (2006) ‘Broaden your views: implicatures of domain widening and the “logicality” of language’, Linguistic Inquiry 37: 535–90.
Chomsky, N. (1955) The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory, mimeo, MIT (subsequently published as Chomsky 1975).
Chomsky, N. (1957) Syntactic Structures, Mouton, The Hague.
Chomsky, N. (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Chomsky, N. (1968) Interview with S. Hampshire in The Listener, May 1968.
Chomsky, N. (1970) ‘Remarks on nominalization’, in Jacobs, R. A. and Rosenbaum, P. S. (eds.) Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Ginn, Waltham, MA, pp. 184–221.
Chomsky, N. (1972) Language and Mind (enlarged edition), Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.
Chomsky, N. (1973) ‘Conditions on transformations’, in Anderson, S. R. and Kiparsky, P. (eds.) A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp. 232–86.
Chomsky, N. (1975) The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory, Plenum Press, New York (published version of Chomsky 1955).
Chomsky, N. (1977) ‘On Wh-movement’, in Culicover et al. 1977, pp. 71–132.
Chomsky, N. (1980) ‘On binding’, Linguistic Inquiry 11: 1–46.
Chomsky, N. (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.
Chomsky, N. (1982) Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Chomsky, N. (1986a) Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use, Praeger, New York.
Chomsky, N. (1986b) Barriers, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Chomsky, N. (1989) ‘Some notes on economy of derivation and representation’, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 10: 43–74 (reprinted as chapter 2 of Chomsky 1995).
Chomsky, N. (1993) ‘A minimalist program for linguistic theory’, in Hale and Keyser 1993, pp. 1–52 (reprinted as chapter 3 of Chomsky 1995).
Chomsky, N. (1995) The Minimalist Program, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Chomsky, N. (1998) Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework, MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 15 (also published in Martin, R., Michaels, D. and Uriagereka, J. (eds.) Step by Step: Essays on Minimalism in Honor of Howard Lasnik, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA., pp. 89–155).
Chomsky, N. (1999) Derivation by Phase, MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 18 (also published in Kenstowicz, M. (ed.) (2001) Ken Hale: A Life in Language, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 1–52).
Chomsky, N. (2001) Beyond Explanatory Adequacy, unpublished manuscript, MIT. (A published version appeared in Belletti, A. (ed.) (2004) Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. III, Oxford University Press, pp. 104–31).
Chomsky, N. (2002) On Nature and Language, Cambridge University Press.
Chomsky, N. (2005a) ‘Three factors in language design’, Linguistic Inquiry 36: 1–22.
Chomsky, N. (2005b) ‘On phases’, unpublished paper, MIT (to appear in Freidin, R., Otero, C. P. and Zubizaretta, M.-L. (eds.) Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
Chomsky, N. (2006) ‘Approaching UG from below’, unpublished paper, MIT.
Chomsky, N. and Lasnik, H. (1977) ‘Filters and control’, Linguistic Inquiry 8: 425–504.
Chomsky, N. and Lasnik, H. (1993) ‘The theory of principles and parameters’, in Jacobs, J., Stechow, A., Sternefeld, W. and Venneman, T. (eds.) Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 506–69 (reprinted in Chomsky 1995, pp. 13–127).
Chung, S. (1994) ‘Wh-agreement and “Referentiality” in Chamorro’, Linguistic Inquiry 25: 1–45.
Chung, S. (1998) The Design of Agreement: Evidence from Chamorro, University of Chicago Press.
Chung, S. (2004) ‘Restructuring and verb-initial order in Chamorro’, Syntax 7: 199–233.
Cinque, G. (1994) ‘Evidence for partial N-movement in the Romance DP’, in Cinque, G., Koster, J., Pollock, J.-Y., Rizzi, L. and Zanuttini, R. (eds.) Paths towards Universal Grammar: Studies in Honor of Richard Kayne, Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC, pp. 85–110.
Cinque, G. (1999) Adverbs and Functional Heads, Oxford University Press.
Cinque, G. (2002) Functional Structure in DP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. I, Oxford University Press.
Cinque, G. (2004) ‘“Restructuring” and functional structure’, in Belletti, A. (ed.) The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. III Structures and Beyond, Oxford University Press, pp. 132–91.
Cinque, G. (2005) ‘Deriving Greenberg's universal 20 and its exceptions’, Linguistic Inquiry 20: 315–32.
Cinque, G. and Kayne, R. S. (eds.) (2005) Handbook of Comparative Syntax, Oxford University Press.
Citko, B. (2005) ‘On the nature of Merge: External Merge, Internal Merge and Parallel Merge’, Linguistic Inquiry 36: 475–96.
Citko, B. (2006) ‘The interaction between across-the-board wh-movement and left branch extraction’, Syntax 9: 225–47.
Clahsen, H. (2008) ‘Chomskyan Syntactic theory and language disorder’, in Ball, M. J., Perkins, M., Mueller, N. and Howard, S. (eds.) The Handbook of Clinical Linguistics, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 165–83.
Clifton, C., Fanselow, G. and Frazier, L. (2006) ‘Amnestying superiority violations: processing multiple questions’, Linguistic Inquiry 37: 51–68.
Cole, P. (1982) Imbabura Quechua, North-Holland, The Hague.
Cole, P. and Hermon, G. (1998) ‘The typology of wh-movement: Wh-questions in Malay’, Syntax 1: 221–58.
Cole, P. and Hermon, G. (2000) ‘Partial wh-movement: evidence from Malay’, in Lutz, Müller and van Stechow 2000, pp. 101–30.
Collins, C. (1993) Topics in Ewe Syntax, PhD dissertation, MIT.
Collins, C. (1997) Local Economy, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Collins, C. (2005a) ‘A smuggling approach to the passive in English’, Syntax 8: 81–120.
Collins, C. (2005b) ‘A smuggling approach to raising in English’, Linguistic Inquiry 36: 289–98.
Collins, C. and Branigan, P. (1997) ‘Quotative Inversion’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15: 1–41.
Collins, C. and Thráinsson, H. (1993) ‘Object shift in double object constructions and the theory of Case’, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 19: 131–74.
Contreras, H. (1986) ‘Spanish bare NPs and the ECP’, in Bordelois, I., Contreras, H. and Zagona, K. (eds.) Generative Studies in Spanish Syntax, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 25–49.
Contreras, J. (1987) ‘Small clauses in Spanish and English’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 5: 225–44.
Coppock, L. (2002) ‘Gapping: in defense of deletion’, Chicago Linguistics Society 37: 133–48.
Cormack, A. and Smith, N. (1999) ‘Where is a sign merged?’, Glot International 4, 6: 21.
Cormack, A. and Smith, N. (2000a) ‘Head Movement and negation in English’, Transactions of the Philological Society 98: 49–85.
Cormack, A. and Smith, N. (2000b) ‘Fronting: the syntax and pragmatics of “focus” and “topic”’, UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 20: 387–417.
Corver, N. (1990) The Syntax of Left Branch Extractions, PhD dissertation, Tilburg University.
Crain, S. and Pietroski, P. (2002) ‘Why language acquisition is a snap’, The Linguistic Review 19: 163–83.
Cuervo, M. C. (1999) ‘Quirky but not eccentric: dative subjects in Spanish’, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 34: 213–27.
Culicover, P. W. (1991) ‘Topicalization, inversion and complementiser in English’, in Delfitto, D., Everaert, M., Evers, A. and Stuurman, F. (eds.) OTS Working Papers: Going Romance and Beyond, University of Utrecht, pp. 1–45.
Culicover, P. W. and Jackendoff, R. (2001) ‘Control is not movement’, Linguistic Inquiry 30: 483–512.
Culicover, P. W. and Jackendoff, R. (2005) Simpler Syntax, Oxford University Press.
Culicover, P. W. and Jackendoff, R. (2006) ‘Turn over control to the semantics’, Syntax 9: 131–52.
Culicover, P. and Levine, R. D. (2001) ‘Stylistic inversion in English: a reconsideration’, Natural Language and Linguisitc Theory 19: 283–310.
Culicover, P. W. and Nowak, A. (2003) Dynamical Grammar: Minimalism, Acquisition and Change, Oxford University Press.
Culicover, P. W., Wasow, T. and Akmajian, A. (eds.) (1977) Formal Syntax, Academic Press, New York.
Cummins, S. and Roberge, Y. (2004) ‘Null objects in French and English’, in Auger, J., Clements, C. and Vance, B. (eds.) Contemporary Approaches to Romance Linguistics, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 121–38.
Cummins, S. and Roberge, Y. (2005) ‘A modular account of null objects in French’, Syntax 8: 44–64.
Curtiss, S. (1977) Genie: A Psycholinguistic Study of a Modern Day “Wild Child”, Academic Press, London.
Davies, W. D. and Dubinsky, S. (2004) The Grammar of Raising and Control: A Course in Syntactic Argumentation, Blackwell, Oxford.
Dayal, V. (2002) ‘Single-pair versus multiple-pair answers: Wh-in-situ and scope’, Linguistic Inquiry 33: 512–20.
Déchaine, R.-M. and Wiltschko, M. (2002) ‘Decomposing pronouns’, Linguistic Inquiry 33: 409–42.
del Gobbo, F. (2003) Appositives at the Interface, PhD dissertation, University of California, Irvine.
Dikken, M. (2001) ‘Pluringulars, pronouns and quirky agreement’, The Linguistic Review 18: 19–41.
Dikken, M. and Giannakidou, A. (2002) ‘From hell to polarity: “aggressively non-D-linked” wh-phrases as polarity items’, Linguistic Inquiry 33: 31–61.
Denham, K. (2000) ‘Optional wh-movement in Babine-Witsuwit'en’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 199–251.
Déprez, V. (2000) ‘Parallel (a)symmetries and the internal structure of negative expressions’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 253–342.
Vries, M. (2002) The Syntax of Relativization, LOT, Utrecht.
Vries, M. (2006) ‘The syntax of appositive relativization: on specifying co-ordination, false free relatives and promotion’, Linguistic Inquiry 37: 229–70.
Diesing, M. (1992) Indefinites, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Diesing, M. and Jelinek, E. (1995) ‘Distributing arguments’, Natural Language Semantics 3: 123–76.
Donati, C. (2006) ‘On wh-head movement’, in Cheng and Corver 2006, pp. 21–46.
Drubig, H. N. (2003) ‘Toward a typology of focus and focus constructions’, Linguistics 41: 1–50.
Dukes, M. (2000) ‘Agreement in Chamorro’, Journal of Linguistics 36: 575–88.
du Plessis, H. (1977) ‘Wh-movement in Afrikaans’, Linguistic Inquiry 8: 211–22.
Embick, D. (2004) ‘On the structure of resultative participles in English’, Linguistic Inquiry 35: 355–92.
Embick, D. and Noyer, R. (2001) ‘Movement operations after syntax’, Linguistic Inquiry 32: 555–95.
Emonds, J. E. (1976) A Transformational Approach to English Syntax, Academic Press, New York.
Emonds, J. E. (1993) ‘Projecting indirect objects’, The Linguistic Review 10: 211–63.
Emonds, J. E. (1994) ‘Two principles of economy’, in Cinque, G., Koster, J., Pollock, J.-Y., Rizzi, L. and Zanuttini, R. (eds.) Paths towards Universal Grammar: Studies in Honor of Richard Kayne, Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC, pp. 155–72.
Epstein, S. D., Pires, A. and Seely, T. D. (2005) ‘EPP in T: more controversial subjects’, Syntax 8: 65–80.
Ernst, T. (1991) ‘On the scope principle’, Linguistic Inquiry 22: 750–6.
Escribano, J. L. G. (2004) ‘NPs as just NPs’, unpublished paper, University of Oviedo.
Everett, D. (2005) ‘Biology and language: a consideration of alternatives’, Journal of Linguistics 41: 157–75.
Everett, D. (2006) ‘Biology and language: response to Anderson & Lightfoot’, Journal of Linguistics 42: 385–93.
Fabb, N. (1990) ‘The difference between English restrictive and non-restrictive clauses’, Journal of Linguistics 26: 57–78.
Fanselow, G. (2002) ‘Against remnant VP-movement’, in Alexiadou, A., Anagnostopoulou, E., Barbiers, S. and Gaertner, H.-M. (eds.) Dimensions of Movement: From Features to Remnants, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 91–125.
Fanselow, G. and Ćavar, D. (2002) ‘Distributed deletion’, in Alexiadou, A. (ed.) Theoretical Approaches to Universals, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 65–107.
Farrell, P. (1990) ‘Null objects in Brazilian Portuguese’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8: 325–46.
Fasold, R. (1980) ‘The relation between black and white speech in the south’, ms., School of Languages and Linguistics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Fauconnier, G. (1975) ‘Polarity and the scale principle’, Chicago Linguistics Society 11: 188–99.
Fauconnier, G. (1978) ‘Implication reversal in a natural language’, in Guenthner, F. and Schmidt, S. J. (eds.) Formal Semantics and Pragmatics for Natural Languages, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 289–302.
Felser, C. (1999a) Verbal Complement Clauses: A Minimalist Study of Direct Perception Constructions, Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Felser, C. (1999b) ‘Perception and control: a Minimalist analysis of English direct perception complements’, Journal of Linguistics 34: 351–85.
Felser, C. (2004) ‘Wh-copying, phases and successive cyclicity’, Lingua 114: 543–74.
Felser, C. and Rupp, L. (2001) ‘Expletives as arguments: Germanic existential sentences revisited’, Linguistische Berichte 187: 289–324.
Fillmore, C. J. (1968) ‘The case for case’, in Bach, E. and Harms, R. T. (eds.) Universals in Linguistic Theory, Holt Rinehart & Winston, New York, pp. 1–88.
Fillmore, C. J. (1972) ‘Subjects, speakers and roles’, in Davidson, D. and Harman, G. (eds.) Semantics of Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Fitch, W. T., Hauser, M. D. and Chomsky, N. (2005) ‘The evolution of the language faculty: clarification and implications’, Cognition 97: 179–210.
Fitzmaurice, S. (2000) ‘Remarks on the de-grammaticalization of infinitival to in present-day American English’, in Fischer, O., Rosenberg, A. and Stein, D. (eds.) Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English, Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 171–86.
Flagg, E. (2002) Interface Issues in the English Imperative, PhD dissertation, Cambridge, MA.
Fodor, J. D. (2001) ‘Setting syntactic parameters’, in Baltin and Collins 2001, pp. 730–67.
Fodor, J. D. and Crowther, C. (2002) ‘Understanding stimulus poverty arguments’, The Linguistic Review 19: 105–45.
Fodor, J. D. and Sakas, W. G. (2005) ‘The subset principle in syntax: costs of compliance’, Journal of Linguistics 41: 513–69.
Folli, R. and Harley, H. (2007) ‘Causation, obligation and Argument Structure: on the nature of little v’, Linguistic Inquiry 38: 197–238.
Fox, D. (2000) Economy and Semantic Interpretation, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Fox, D. and Lasnik, H. (2003) ‘Successive-cyclic movement and island repair: the difference between sluicing and VP ellipsis’, Linguistic Inquiry 34: 143–54.
Fox, D. and Nissenbaum, J. (2004) ‘Condition A and scope reconstruction’, Linguistic Inquiry 35: 475–85.
Frank, R. and Vijay-Shanker, K. (2001) ‘Primitive c-command’, Syntax 4: 164–204.
Franks, S. (1999) ‘Optimality theory and clitics at PF’, Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 7: 101–16.
Franks, S. and Lavine, J. E. (2006) ‘Case and word order in Lithuanian’, Journal of Linguistics 42: 239–88.
Franks, S. and Progovac, L. (1994) ‘On the placement of Serbo-Croatian clitics’, Indiana Linguistic Studies 7: 69–78.
Frazier, L. and Clifton, C. (2005) ‘The syntax–discourse divide: processing ellipsis’, Syntax 8: 121–74.
Freidin, R. (2004) ‘Syntactic Structures redux’, Syntax 7: 101–27.
Freidin, R. and Vergnaud, J. R. (2001) ‘Exquisite connections: some remarks on the evolution of linguistic theory’, Lingua 111: 639–66.
George, L. (1980) Analogical Generalization in Natural Language Syntax, PhD dissertation, MIT.
Georgopoulos, C. (1985) ‘Variable in Palauan syntax’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 59–94.
Georgopoulos, C. (1991) Syntactic Variables: Resumptive Pronouns and A'-binding in Palauan, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Giannikidou, A. (1997) The Landscape of Polarity Items, PhD dissertation, University of Groningen.
Giannikidou, A. (1998) Polarity Sensitivity as (Non)veridical Dependency, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Giannikidou, A. (1999) ‘Affective dependencies’, Linguistics and Philosophy 22: 367–421.
Giegerich, H. J. (2005) ‘Associative adjectives in English and the lexicon–syntax interface’, Journal of Linguistics 41: 571–91.
Giorgi, A. (2007) ‘On the nature of long-distance anaphors’, Linguistic Inquiry 38: 321–42.
Giusti, G. (1991) ‘The categorial status of quantifier nominals’, Linguistische Berichte 136: 438–52.
Giusti, G. (1997) ‘The categorial status of determiners’, in Haegeman, L. (ed.) The New Comparative Syntax, Cambridge University Press, pp. 94–113.
Givón, T. (2002) Biolinguistics: The Santa Barbara Lectures, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Goodall, G. (1997) ‘Theta-alignment and the by-phrase’, Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistics Society 33: 129–39.
Goodall, G. (1999) ‘Accusative case in passives’, Linguistics 37: 1–12.
Green, L. (1998) ‘Semantic and syntactic patterns in African American English’, ms. University of Massachusetts.
Green, M. (2007) Focus in Hausa, Blackwell, Oxford.
Grice, H. P. (1975) ‘Logic and conversation’, in Cole, P. and Morgan, J. (eds.) Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, Academic Press, New York, pp. 41–58.
Grimshaw, J. (1993) ‘Minimal projection, heads, and optimality’, draft manuscript, Rutgers University.
Groat, E. (1995) ‘English expletives: a minimalist approach’, Linguistic Inquiry 26: 354–65.
Groat, E. and O'Neil, J. (1996) ‘Spell-out at the LF interface’, in Abraham, W., Epstein, S. D., Thráinsson, H. and Zwart, C. J.-W. (eds.) Minimal Ideas, Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 113–39.
Groefsema, M. (1995) ‘Understood arguments: a semantic/pragmatic approach’, Lingua 96: 139–61.
Grohmann, K. K. (2000) Prolific Peripheries: A Radical View from the Left, PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.
Grohmann, K. K. (2003a) Prolific Domains, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Grohmann, K. K. (2003b) ‘Successive cyclicity under (anti-) local considerations’, Syntax 6: 260–312.
Grohmann, K. K. (2006) ‘Top issues in questions: topics – topicalization – topicalizability’, in Cheng and Corver 2006, pp. 249–88.
Grohmann, K. K., Drury, J. and Castillo, J. C. (2000) ‘No more EPP’, Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 19: 153–66.
Grohmann, K. K. & Haegeman, L. (2002) ‘Resuming reflexives’, Proceedings of the 19th Scandinavian Conference in Linguistics, Tromsø, Norway.
Grosu, A. and Horvath, J. (2006) ‘Reply to Bhatt and Pancheva's “Late merger of degree clauses”: the irrelevance of (non)conservativity’, Linguistic Inquiry 37: 457–83.
Gruber, J. S. (1965) Studies in Lexical Relations, PhD dissertation, MIT.
Gruber, J. S. (1976) Lexical Structures in Syntax and Semantics, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
Gualmini, A. and Crain, S. (2005) ‘The structure of children's linguistic knowledge’, Linguistic Inquiry 36: 463–74.
Guasti, M. T. (2002) Language Acquisition: The Growth of Grammar, Bradford Books, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Guilfoyle, E. (1994) ‘VNPs, finiteness and external arguments’, Proceedings of NELS 24: 141–55.
Guilfoyle, E., Hung, H. and Travis, L. (1992) ‘Spec of IP and spec of VP: two subjects in Austronesian languages’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10: 375–414.
Haddican, B. (2007) ‘The structural deficiency of verbal pro-forms’, Linguistic Inquiry 38: 539–47.
Haeberli, E. (2003) ‘Categorial features as the source of EPP and abstract Case phenomena’, in Brandner, E. and Zinsmeister, H. (eds.) New Perspectives on Case Theory, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA, pp. 89–126.
Haegeman, L. (1986) ‘The present subjunctive in contemporary British English’, Studia Anglica Posnaniensa 19: 61–74.
Haegeman, L. (1990) ‘Non-overt subjects in diary contexts’, in Mascarò, J. and Nespor, M. (eds.) Grammar in Progress, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 167–79.
Haegeman, L. (1992) Theory and Description in Generative Syntax: A Case Study of West Flemish, Cambridge University Press.
Haegeman, L. (1994) Introduction to Government and Binding Theory, 2nd edn, Blackwell, Oxford.
Haegeman, L. (1995) The Syntax of Negation, Cambridge University Press.
Haegeman, L. (2000) ‘Inversion, non-adjacent inversion and adjuncts in CP’, in Transactions of the Philological Society98: 121–60.
Haegeman, L. (2006) ‘Clitic climbing and the dual status of sembrare’, Linguistic Inquiry 37: 484–501.
Hale, K. and Keyser, S. J. (1991) On the Syntax of Argument Structure, Lexicon Project Working Papers, MIT, Center for Cognitive Science, Cambridge, MA.
Hale, K. and Keyser, S. J. (1993a) ‘On argument structure and the lexical expression of semantic relations’, in Hale and Keyser 1993b, pp. 53–109.
Hale, K. and Keyser, S. J. (eds.) (1993b) The View from Building 20, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Hale, K. and Keyser, S. J. (1994) ‘Constraints on argument structure’, in Lust, B., Suñer, M. and Whitman, J. (eds.) Heads, Projections and Learnability, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, vol. I, pp. 53–71.
Halle, M. and Marantz, A. (1993) ‘Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection’, in Hale and Keyser 1993b, pp. 111–76.
Han, C.-H. (2001) ‘Force, negation and imperatives’, The Linguistic Review 18: 289–325.
Han, H.-S. (2004) ‘There as an existential operator’, Language Research 40: 451–464 (published by Language Research Institute, Seoul National University).
Hankamer, J. (1971) Constraints on Deletion in Syntax, PhD dissertation, Yale University.
Hankamer, J. and Sag, I. (1976) ‘Deep and surface anaphora’, Linguistic Inquiry 7: 391–428.
Hardt, D. (1993) Verb Phrase Ellipsis: Form, Meaning and Processing, PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Harley, H. (2003) ‘Possession and the double object construction’, in Pica, P. and Rooryck, J. (eds.) Yearbook of Linguistic Variation, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 29–62.
Hawkins, J. A. (2001) ‘Why are categories adjacent?’, Journal of Linguistics 37: 1–34.
Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N. and Fitch, W. T. (2002) ‘The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298: 1569–79.
Hazout, I. (2004a) ‘Long-distance agreement and the syntax of for-to infinitives’, Linguistic Inquiry 35: 338–43.
Hazout, I. (2004b) ‘The syntax of existential constructions’, Linguistic Inquiry 35: 393–430.
Heck, F. (2004) A Theory of Pied-Piping, PhD dissertation, University of Tübingen.
Henderson, B. (2006) ‘Multiple agreement and inversion in Bantu’, Syntax 9: 275–89.
Hendrick, R. (1991) ‘The morphosyntax of aspect’, Lingua 85: 171–210.
Henry, A. (1995) Belfast English and Standard English: Dialect Variation and Parameter-Setting, Oxford University Press.
Henry, A. and Cottell, S. (2007), ‘A new approach to transitive expletives: evidence from Belfast English’, English Language and Linguistics 11: 279–99.
Herdan, S. and Sharvit, Y. (2006) ‘Definite and non-definite superlatives and NPI licensing’, Syntax 9: 1–31.
Hiemstra, I. (1986) ‘Some aspects of wh-questions in Frisian’, North-Western European Language Evolution (NOWELE) 8: 97–110.
Hiraira, K. (2001) ‘Multiple agree and the Defective Intervention Constraint’, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 40: 67–80.
Hiraira, K. (2005) Dimensions of Symmetry in Syntax: Agreement and Clausal Architecture, PhD dissertation, MIT.
Hiramatsu, K. (2003) ‘Children's judgments on negative questions’, Language Acquisition 11: 99–126.
Hoge, K. (1998) ‘The Yiddish double verb construction’, Oxford University Working Papers in Linguistics, Philology and Phonetics 2: 85–97.
Hojo, K. (1971) ‘The present subjunctive in English NP complements’, Ronshuu 17: 93–112.
Holmberg, A. (1999) ‘Remarks on Holmberg's generalization’, Studia Linguistica 53: 1–39.
Holmberg, A. (2000a) ‘Am I unscientific? A reply to Lappin, Levine and Johnson’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 837–42.
Holmberg, A. (2000b) ‘Scandinavian stylistic fronting: how any category can become an expletive’, Linguistic Inquiry 31: 445–83.
Holmberg, A. (2005) ‘Is there a little pro? Evidence from Finnish’, Linguistic Inquiry 36: 533–64.
Hong, S.-H. (2005) Aspects of the Syntax of Questions in English and Korean, PhD dissertation, University of Essex.
Hornstein, N. (1995) Logical Form: From GB to Minimalism, Blackwell, Oxford.
Hornstein, N. (1999) ‘Movement and control’, Linguistic Inquiry 30: 69–96.
Hornstein, N. (2000) ‘On A-chains: A reply to Brody’, Syntax 3: 129–43.
Hornstein, N. (2001) Move: A Minimalist Theory of Construal, Blackwell, Oxford.
Hornstein, N. (2003) ‘On control’, in Hendrick, R. (ed.) Minimalist Syntax, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 6–81.
Hornstein, N. (2007) ‘A very short note on existential constructions’, Linguistic Inquiry 38: 410–11.
Huang, C.-T. J. (1982) Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar, PhD dissertation, MIT.
Huang, C.-T. J. (1984) ‘On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns’, Linguistic Inquiry 15: 531–74.
Huang, C.-T. J. (1991) ‘Remarks on the status of the null object’, in Freidin, R. (ed.) Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 56–76.
Huang, C.-T. J. (1993) ‘Reconstruction and the structure of VP: some theoretical consequences’, Linguistic Inquiry 24: 103–38.
Huddleston, R. (1994) ‘The contrast between interrogatives and questions’, Journal of Linguistics 30: 411–39.
Hurford, J. (1991) ‘The evolution of the critical period for language acquisition’, Cognition 40: 159–201.
Hyams, N. (1986) Language Acquisition and the Theory of Parameters, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Hyams, N. (1992) ‘A reanalysis of null subjects in child language’, in Weissenborn, J., Goodluck, H. and Roeper, T. (eds.) Theoretical Issues in Language Acquisition, Erlbaum, London, pp. 249–67.
Iatridou, S. (1990) ‘About Agr(P)’, Linguistic Inquiry 21: 766–72.
Ingham, R. (2000) ‘Negation and OV order in Late Middle English’, Journal of Linguistics 36: 13–38.
Ingham, R. (2002) ‘Negated subjects and objects in 15th century non-literary English’, Language Variation and Change 14: 291–322.
Ingham, R. (2007) ‘A structural constraint on negation in Late Middle and Early Modern English’, in Krygier, M. and Siworska, L. (eds.) Medieval English Mirror 3: To Make his Englissh Sweete upon his Tonge, Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main.
Isac, D. (2006) ‘In defense of a quantificational account of definite DPs’, Linguistic Inquiry 37: 275–88.
Ishii, T. (1999) ‘Cyclic spell-out and the that-t effects’, in Proceedings of WCCFL 18: 220–31.
Ishii, T. (2006a) ‘On the relaxation of intervention effects’, in Cheng and Corver 2006, pp. 217–46.
Ishii, T. (2006b) ‘A uniform/nonuniform analysis of overt wh-movement’, Linguistic Inquiry 37: 155–67.
Jackendoff, R. S. (1972) Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Jackendoff, R. S. (1974) Introduction to the X-bar convention, Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Jackendoff, R. S. (1977a) X-bar Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Jackendoff, R. S. (1977b) ‘Constraints on phrase structure rules’, in Culicover et al. 1977, pp. 249–83.
Jackendoff, R. S. and Culicover, P. W. (2003) ‘The semantic basis of control in English’, Language 79: 517–56.
Jaeggli, O. (1982) Topics in Romance Syntax, Foris, Dordrecht.
Jaeggli, O. (1984) ‘Subject extraction and the null subject parameter’, NELS 14: 132–53.
Jaeggli, O. (1986) ‘Passive’, Linguistic Inquiry 17: 587–622.
Jaeggli, O. and Safir, K. (1989) The Null Subject Parameter, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Jenkins, L. (1975) The English Existential, Narr, Tübingen.
Jeong, Y. (2006) The Landscape of Applicatives, PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.
Jespersen, O. (1937) Analytic Syntax, George Allen and Unwin, London (reprinted in 1969 by Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York).
Jiménez, Á. (2000a) ‘The interpretation of tense and aspect in argument small clauses’, Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 40: 279–98.
Jiménez, Á. (2000b) ‘The aspectual morpheme as and feature movement in argument small clauses’, Generative Linguistics in Poland 1: 59–69.
Johannessen, J. B. (1998) The Syntax of Co-ordination, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Johnson, K. (2000) ‘Few dogs like Whiskas or cats Alpo’, University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 23: 59–82.
Johnson, K. (2001) ‘What VP-ellipsis can do, and what it can't, but not why’, in Baltin, M. and Collins, C. (eds.) The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 439–79.
Johnson, K. (2002) ‘Restoring exotic co-ordinations to normalcy’, Linguistic Inquiry 33: 97–156.
Jones, M. A. (1994) Sardinian Syntax, Routledge, London.
Julien, M. (2001) ‘The syntax of complex tenses’, The Linguistic Review 18: 125–67.
Kaplan, J. P. (1988) ‘Small clauses and the projection principle’, Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 14: 78–87.
Kato, M. A. (1999) ‘Strong pronouns and weak pronominals in the null subject parameter’, Probus 11: 1–37.
Kato, M. A. (2000) ‘The partial pro-drop nature and the restricted VS order in Brazilian Portuguese’, in Kato, M. A. and Negrão, E. V. (eds.) The Null Subject Parameter in Brazilian Portuguese, Vervuert-IberoAmericana, Madrid, pp. 223–58.
Katz, J. J. and Postal, P. M. (1964) An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Kayne, R. S. (1984) Connectedness and Binary Branching, Foris, Dordrect.
Kayne, R. S. (1989) ‘Facets of Romance past participle agreement’, in Benincà, P. (ed.) Dialect Variation and the Theory of Grammar, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 85–103.
Kayne, R. S. (1994) The Antisymmetry of Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Kayne, R. S. (2005) ‘Some notes on comparative syntax, with special reference to English and French’, in Cinque and Kayne 2005, pp. 3–69.
Kayne, R. S. and Pollock, J.-Y. (1978) ‘Stylistic inversion, successive cyclicity, and Move NP in French’, Linguistic Inquiry 9: 595–621.
Kennedy, C. (1999) Projecting the Adjective: The Syntax and Semantics of Gradability and Comparison, Garland, New York.
Kennedy, C. (2002) ‘Comparative deletion and optimality in syntax’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 553–621.
Kennedy, C. (2003) ‘Ellipsis and syntactic representation’, in Schwabe, K. and Winkler, S. (eds.) The Syntax–Semantics Interface: Interpreting (Omitted) Structure, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Kennedy, C. and Merchant, J. (2000), ‘Attributive comparative deletion’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 89–146.
Keyser, S. J. and Roeper, T. (1992) ‘Re: the abstract clitic hypothesis’, Linguistic Inquiry 23: 89–125.
Kimball, J. and Aissen, J. (1971) ‘I think, you think, he think’, Linguistic Inquiry 2: 241–6.
Kiparsky, P. and Kiparsky, C. (1970) ‘Fact’, in Bierwisch, M. and Heidolph, K. E. (eds.) Programs in Linguistics: A Collection of Papers, Mouton, The Hague.
Kishimoto, H. (2000) ‘Indefinite pronouns and overt N-raising’, Linguistic Inquiry 31: 557–66.
Kishimoto, H. (2006) ‘On the existence of null complementisers in syntax’, Linguistic Inquiry 37: 339–45.
Kiss, É. K. (2001) ‘The EPP in a topic-prominent language’, in Svenonius, P. (ed.) Subjects, Expletives and the EPP, Oxford University Press, pp. 107–24.
Kitagawa, Y. (1985) ‘Small but clausal’, Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society 21: 210–20.
Kitagawa, Y. (1986) Subjects in English and Japanese, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts.
Klima, E. S. (1964) ‘Negation in English’, in Fodor, J. A. and Katz, J. J. (eds.) The Structure of Language, Prentice–Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 246–323.
Ko, H. (2005) Syntactic Edges and Linearization, PhD dissertation, MIT.
Koeneman, O. (2000) The Flexible Nature of Verb Movement, PhD dissertation, University of Utrecht.
Koizumi, M. (1993) ‘Object agreement phrases and the split VP hypothesis’, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 18: 99–148.
Koizumi, M. (1995) Phrase Structure in Minimalist Syntax, PhD dissertation, MIT.
Koopman, H. (1984) The Syntax of Verbs: From Verb Movement Rules in the Kru Languages to Universal Grammar, Foris, Dordrecht.
Koopman, H. (2005) ‘Korean (and Japanese) morphology from a syntactic perspective’, Linguistic Inquiry 36: 601–33.
Koopman, H. and Sportiche, D. (1991) ‘The position of subjects’, Lingua 85: 211–58.
Kornfilt, J. (2004) ‘Unmasking covert complementiser agreement’, unpublished paper presented at LSA conference, Boston, MA, January 2004.
Koster, J. (1978) ‘Why subject sentences don't exist’, in Keyser, S. J. (ed.) Recent Transformational Studies in European Languages, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 53–64.
Kratzer, A. (1993) ‘On external arguments’, University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 17: 103–30.
Kratzer, A. (1995) ‘Stage-level and individual-level predicates’, in Carlson, G. and Pelletier, F. J. (eds.) The Generic Book, Chicago University Press, pp. 125–75.
Kratzer, A. (1996) ‘Severing the external argument from its verb’, in Rooryck, J. and Zaring, L. (eds.) Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 109–37.
Kroch, A. (2001) ‘Syntactic Change’, in Baltin and Collins 2001, pp. 699–729.
Kuno, S. (1981) ‘Functional Syntax’, Syntax and Semantics 13: 117–35.
Kural, M. (2005) ‘Tree traversal and word order’, Linguistic Inquiry 36: 367–87.
Kuroda, Y. (1988) ‘Whether we agree or not’, Lingvisticae Investigationes 12: 1–47.
Labov, W. (1969) ‘Contraction, deletion and the inherent variability of the English copula’, Language 45: 715–62.
Ladusaw, W. (1979) Polarity Sensitivity as Inherent Scope Relations, PhD dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
Lahiri, U. (1998) ‘Focus and negative polarity in Hindi’, Natural Language Semantics 6: 57–123.
Laka, M. I. (1990) Negation in Syntax: On the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections, PhD dissertation, MIT.
Landau, I. (1999) Elements of Control, PhD dissertation, MIT.
Landau, I. (2001) ‘Control and extraposition: the case of Super-Equi’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 109–52.
Landau, I. (2002) ‘(Un)interpretable Neg in Comp’, Linguistic Inquiry 33: 465–92.
Landau, I. (2003) ‘Movement out of control’, Linguistic Inquiry 34: 471–98.
Landau, I. (2004) ‘The scale of finiteness and the calculus of Control’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 811–77.
Landau, I. (2006a) ‘Severing the distribution of PRO from case’, Syntax 9: 153–70.
Landau, I. (2006b) ‘Chain resolution in Hebrew V(P) fronting’, Syntax 9: 32–66.
Landau, I. (2007) ‘EPP extensions’, Linguistic Inquiry 38: 485–523.
Lappin, S., Levine, R. D. and Johnson, D. E. (2000a) ‘Topic…Comment: the structure of unscientific revolutions’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 665–71.
Lappin, S., Levine, R. D. and Johnson, D. E. (2000b) ‘The revolution confused: a response to our critics’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 873–90.
Lappin, S., Levine, R. D. and Johnson, D. E. (2001) ‘The revolution maximally confused’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 901–19.
Lappin, S. and Shieber, S. (2007), ‘Machine learning theory and practice as a source of insight into universal grammar’, Journal of Linguistics 43: 393–427.
Larson, R. (1988) ‘On the double object construction’, Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335–91.
Larson, R. (1990) ‘Double objects revisited: reply to Jackendoff’, Linguistic Inquiry 21: 589–632.
Larson, R. (1991) ‘Promise and the theory of control’, Linguistic Inquiry 2: 103–39.
Larson, R. and Lefebvre, C. (1991) ‘Predicate cleft in Haitian Creole’, North Eastern Linguistics Society 21: 247–61.
Larson, R. and Marušič, F. (2004) ‘On indefinite pronoun structures with APs: reply to Kishimoto’, Linguistic Inquiry 35: 268–87.
Lasnik, H. (1992) ‘Case and expletives: notes toward a parametric account’, Linguistic Inquiry 23: 381–405.
Lasnik, H. (1995a) ‘Verbal Morphology: Syntactic Structures meets the Minimalist Program’, in Campos, H. and Kempchinsky, P. (eds.) Evolution and Revolution in Linguistic Theory, Georgetown University Press, pp. 251–75.
Lasnik, H. (1995b) ‘Case and expletives revisited: on greed and other human failings’, Linguistic Inquiry 26: 615–33.
Lasnik, H. (1998) ‘Some reconstruction riddles’, in Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 5: 83–98, Penn Linguistics Circle, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Lasnik, H. (1999) ‘Chains of arguments’, in Epstein, S. D. and Hornstein, N. (eds.) Working Minimalism, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 189–215.
Lasnik, H. (2000) Syntactic Structures Revisited: Contemporary Lectures on Classic Transformational Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (with M. Depiante and A. Stepanov).
Lasnik, H. (2003) Minimalist Investigations in Linguistic Theory, Routledge, London.
Lasnik, H. (2006) ‘Conceptions of the cycle’, in Cheng & Corver 2006: 197–216.
Lasnik, H. and Uriagereka, J. (2002) ‘On the poverty of the challenge’, The Linguistic Review 19: 147–50.
Lebeaux, D. (1991) ‘Relative clauses, licensing and the nature of derivation’, in Rothstein, S. (ed.) Syntax and Semantics 25: Perspectives on Phrase Structure, Academic Press, New York, pp. 209–39.
Lebeaux, D. (1995) ‘Where does Binding Theory apply?’, University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 3: 63–88.
Lechner, W. (2001) ‘Reduced and phrasal comparatives’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 683–735.
Lee, J. -E. (2004) Ditransitive Structures and (Anti)locality, PhD dissertation, Harvard University.
Legate, J. A. and Yang, C. D. (2002) ‘Empirical re-assessment of stimulus poverty arguments’, The Linguistic Review 19: 151–62.
Lema, J. and Rivero, M. L. (1990) ‘Long head movement: ECP vs. HMC’, Proceedings of NELS 28: 219–45.
Lenneberg, E. (1967) Biological Foundations of Language, Wiley, New York.
Levin, B. and Rappaport Hovav, M. (1995) Unaccusativity at the Syntax–Lexical Semantic Interface, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Lewis, J. and Elman, J. (2002) ‘Learnability and the statistical study of language: poverty of stimulus arguments revisited’, in Skarabela, B., Fish, S. and Do, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 26th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Cascadilla Press, Somerville, MA, pp. 359–70.
Lightfoot, D. (1976) ‘The theoretical implications of Subject Raising’, Foundations of Language 14: 257–86.
Lightfoot, D. (1999) The Development of Language: Acquisition, Change and Evolution, Blackwell, Oxford.
Lightfoot, D. and Hornstein, N. (eds.) (1994) Verb Movement, Cambridge University Press.
Linebarger, M. (1987) ‘Negative polarity and grammatical representation’, Linguistics and Philosophy 10: 325–87.
Lobeck, A. (1995) Ellipsis: Functional Heads, Licensing and Identification, Oxford University Press.
Löbel, E. (1989) ‘Q as a functional category’, in Bhatt, C., Löbel, E. and Schmidt, C. (eds.) Syntactic Phrase Structure Phenomena, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Longobardi, G. (1994) ‘Reference and proper names’, Linguistic Inquiry 25: 609–66.
Longobardi, G. (1996) ‘The syntax of N-raising: a minimalist theory’, OTS Working Papers 5, Research Institute for Language and Speech, Utrecht.
Longobardi, G. (2001) ‘The structure of DPs: some principles, parameters and problems’, in Baltin and Collins 2001, pp. 562–603.
Los, B. (2005) The rise of the to-infinitive, Oxford University Press.
Lundin, K. (2003) Small Clauses in Swedish: Towards a Unified Account, Studentlitteratur, Lund.
Lust, B. (2006) Child Language: Acquisition and Growth, Cambridge University Press.
Lutz, U., Müller, G. and Stechow, A. (eds.) (2000) Wh-Scope Marking, Benjamins, Amsterdam.
MacWhinney, B. (1995). The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk, 2nd edn, LEA, Hillsdale, NJ.
Maekawa, T. (2007) The English Left Periphery in Linearisation-based HPSG, PhD dissertation, University of Essex.
Mahajan, A. (1994) ‘Active passives’, Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 23: 286–301.
Manzini, M. R. (1994) ‘Locality, Minimalism and parasitic gaps’, Linguistic Inquiry 25: 481–508.
Manzini, M. R. and Roussou, A. (2000) ‘A minimalist approach to A-movement and control’, Lingua 110: 409–47.
Manzini, M. R. and Wexler, K. (1987) ‘Parameters, binding theory and learnability’, Linguistic Inquiry 18: 413–44.
Marantz, A. (1984) On the Nature of Grammatical Relations, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Marcus, G. F. (1993) ‘Negative evidence in language acquisition’, Cognition 46: 53–85.
Martin, R. (1996) A Minimalist Theory of PRO and Control, PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Martin, R. (2001) ‘Null case and the distribution of PRO’, Linguistic Inquiry 32: 141–66.
Masullo, P. (1993) ‘Two types of quirky subjects: Spanish versus Icelandic’, Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Society 23: 303–17.
Matsui, C. (1981) ‘The present subjunctive in embedded that clauses’, Insight 13: 45–59.
Matushansky, O. (2006) ‘Head movement in linguistic theory’, Linguistic Inquiry 37: 69–109.
McCawley, J. D. (1993) ‘Gapping with shared operators’, Berkeley Linguistics Society 19: 245–54.
McCloskey, J. (1997) ‘Subjecthood and subject positions’, in Haegeman, L. (ed.) Elements of Grammar, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 197–235.
McCloskey, J. (2000) ‘Quantifier Float and Wh-Movement in an Irish English’, Linguistic Inquiry 31: 57–84.
McCloskey, J. (2001) ‘The morphosyntax of WH-extraction in Irish’, Journal of Linguistics 37: 67–100.
McCloskey, J. (2002) ‘Resumption, successive cyclicity, and the locality of operations’, in Epstein, S. D. and Seeley, T. D. (eds.) Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 184–226.
McDaniel, D. (1986) Conditions on Wh-Chains, doctoral dissertation, City University of New York.
McDaniel, D. (1989) ‘Partial and multiple wh-movement’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7: 565–604.
McGinnis, M. (2003) ‘Variation in the phrase structure of applicatives’, Linguistic Variation Yearbook 1: 105–46.
McGinnis, M. (2004) ‘Lethal ambiguity’, Linguistic Inquiry 35: 47–95.
McGinnis, M. and Richards, N. (eds.) (2005) Perspectives on phases, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 49.
McNally, L. (1992) ‘VP-coordination and the VP-internal subject hypothesis’, Linguistic Inquiry 23: 336–41.
McNeill, D. (1966) ‘Developmental Psycholinguistics’, in Smith, F. and Miller, G. A. (eds.) The Genesis of Language, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 15–84.
Mensching, G. (2000) Infinitive Constructions with Specified Subjects: A Syntactic Analysis of the Romance Languages, Oxford University Press.
Merchant, J. (2001) The Syntax of Silence: Sluicing, Islands and Identity in Ellipsis, Oxford University Press.
Merchant, J. (2005) ‘Fragments and ellipsis’, Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 661–738.
Milsark, G. (1974) Existential Sentences in English, Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington.
Milsark, G. (1977) ‘Peculiarities of the existential construction in English’, Linguistic Analysis 3: 1–29.
Miyagawa, S. (2005) ‘On the EPP’, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 49: 201–36.
Miyagawa, S. (2006) ‘Moving to the edge’, Proceedings of the 2006 KALS-KASELL International Conference on English and Linguistics, Pusan National University, Pusan, Korea, pp. 3–18.
Miyagawa, S. and Tsujioka, T. (2004) ‘Argument structure and ditransitive verbs in Japanese’, Journal of East Asian Linguistics 13: 1–38.
Montalbetti, M. (1984) After Binding, PhD dissertation, MIT.
Moore, J. and Perlmutter, D. M. (2000) ‘What does it take to be a dative subject?’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 373–416.
Morgan, J. L. & Travis, L. (1989) ‘Limits on negative information in language input’, Journal of Child Language 16: 531–52.
Moro, A. (1997) The Raising of Predicates, Cambridge University Press.
Müller, G. and Sternefeld, W. (1993) ‘Improper movement and unambiguous binding’, Linguistic Inquiry 24: 461–507.
Munn, A. (1993) Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of Co-ordinate Structures, PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.
Nakajima, H. (2001) ‘Verbs in locative constructions and the generative lexicon’, The Linguistic Review 18: 43–67.
Nakajima, H. (2006) ‘Adverbial cognate objects’, Linguistic Inquiry 37: 674–84.
Napoli, D. J. (1993) Syntax: Theory and Problems, Oxford University Press.
Neeleman, A. and Szendrői, , K. (2004) ‘Superman sentences’, Linguistic Inquiry 35: 149–59.
Neeleman, A. and Szendrői, K. (2005) ‘Pro Drop and Pronouns’, in Alderete, J.et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the 24th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Cascadilla Press, Somerville, MA, pp. 299–307.
Newmeyer, F. J. (2004) ‘Against a parameter-setting approach to language variation’, Linguistic Variation Yearbook, 4: 181–234.
Newmeyer, F. J. (2005) ‘On split CPs, uninterpretable features and the “perfectness” of language’, Zentrum für allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft Papers in Linguistics 35: 399–422.
Newmeyer, F. J. (2006) ‘A rejoinder to “On the role of parameters in Universal Grammar: a reply to Newmeyer” by Ian Roberts and Anders Holmberg’, ms. University of Washington.
Nkemnji, M. (1995) Heavy Pied-Piping in Nweh, PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
Nomura, T. (2006) ModalP and Subjunctive Present, Hituzi Syobo, Tokyo.
Nordlinger, R. and Sadler, L. (2004) ‘Tense beyond the verb: encoding clausal tense/aspect/mood on nominal dependents’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 597–641.
Nunes, J. (1999) ‘Linearization of chains and phonetic realisation of chain links’, in Epstein, S. D. and Hornstein, N. (eds.) Working Minimalism, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 217–49.
Nunes, J. (2001) ‘Sideward movement’, Linguistic Inquiry 32: 303–44.
Nunes, J. (2004) Linearization of chains and sideward movement, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Nunes, J. and Uriagereka, J. (2000) ‘Cyclicity and extraction domains’, Syntax 3: 20–43.
Ochi, M. (1999) ‘Multiple spell-out and PF-adjacency’, Proceedings of the North-Eastern Linguistic Society 29: 293–306.
O'Neil, J. (1995) ‘Out of control’, Proceedings of the North-Eastern Linguistics Society 25: 361–71.
Ormazabal, J. (1995) The Syntax of Complementation, PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Ortiz de Urbina, J. (1989) Parameters in the Grammar of Basque, Foris, Dordrecht.
Ouhalla, J. (1990) ‘Sentential negation, relativized minimality and the aspectual status of auxiliaries’, The Linguistic Review 7: 183–231.
Oya, T. (2002) ‘Reflexives and resultatives: some differences between English and German’, Linguistics 40: 961–86.
Parker, S. (1999) ‘On the behaviour of definite articles in Chamicuro’, Language 75: 552–62.
Perlmutter, D. (1970) ‘The two verbs begin’, in Jacobs, R. A. and Rosenbaum, P. S. (eds.) Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Ginn, Waltham, MA, pp. 107–19.
Pesetsky, D. (1982) ‘Complementiser-trace phenomena and the Nominative Island Condition’, The Linguistic Review 1: 297–343.
Pesetsky, D. (1987) ‘Wh-in-situ: movement and unselective binding’, in Reuland, E. J. and Meulen, A. G. B. (eds.) The Representation of (In)definiteness, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 98–129.
Pesetsky, D. (1995) Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Pesetsky, D. (1997) ‘Optimality Theory and syntax: movement and pronunciation’, in Archangeli, D. and Langendoen, D. T. (eds.) Optimality Theory: An Overview, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 134–70.
Pesetsky, D. (1998) ‘Some optimality principles of sentence pronunciation’, in Barbosa, P., Fox, D., Hagstrom, P., McGinnis, M. and Pesetsky, D. (eds.) Is the Best Good Enough?MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 337–83.
Pesetsky, D. (2000) Phrasal Movement and its Kin, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Pesetsky, D. and Torrego, E. (2001) ‘T-to-C movement: causes and consequences’, in Kenstowicz, M. (ed.) Ken Hale: A Life in Language, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 355–426.
Pesetsky, D. and Torrego, E. (2007) ‘The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features’, in Karimi, S., Samiian, V. and Wilkins, W. (eds.) Phrasal and Clausal Architecture: Syntactic Derivation and Interpretation, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 262–94.
Phillips, C. (2003) ‘Linear order and constituency’, Linguistic Inquiry 34: 37–90.
Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (2000) ‘The metric of open-mindedness’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 18: 859–62.
Picallo, M. C. (1991) ‘Nominals and nominalization in Catalan’, Probus 3: 279–316.
Platzack, C. and Holmberg, A. (1989) ‘The role of AGR and finiteness’, Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 44: 101–17.
Poletto, C. and Benincà, P. (2004) ‘Topic, focus and V2: defining the CP sublayers’, in Rizzi, L. (ed.) The Structure of IP and CP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. II, Oxford University Press.
Polinsky, M. and Potsdam, E. (2001) ‘Long-distance agreement and Topic in Tsez’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 583–646.
Polinsky, M. and Potsdam, E. (2006) ‘Expanding the scope of control and raising’, Syntax 9: 171–92.
Pollard, C. and Sag, I. A. (1994) Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, CSLI Publications, Chicago.
Pollock, J.-Y. (1989) ‘Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP’, Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365–424.
Postal, P. M. (1966) ‘On so-called pronouns in English’, in Dinneen, F. (ed.) Nineteenth Monograph on Language and Linguistics, Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC (reprinted in D. Reibel and S. Schane (eds.) (1969) Modern Studies in English, Prentice–Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 201–24).
Postal, P. M. (1974) On Raising: One Rule of English Grammar and its Theoretical Implications, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Postal, P. M. (1998) Three Investigations of Extraction, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Postal, P. M. and Pullum, G. K. (1978) ‘Traces and the description of English complementiser contraction’, Linguistic Inquiry 9: 1–29.
Postal, P. M. and Pullum, G. K. (1988) ‘Expletive noun phrases in subcategorized positions’, Linguistic Inquiry 19: 635–70.
Potsdam, E. (1997) ‘NegP and subjunctive’, Linguistic Inquiry 28: 533–41.
Potsdam, E. (1998) Syntactic Issues in the English Imperative, Garland, New York.
Potts, C. (2002) ‘The syntax and semantics of as-parentheticals’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 623–89.
Progovac, L. (2004) ‘Small utterances and small clauses: the syntax’, ms. Wayne State University.
Pullum, G. K. and Scholz, B. C. (2002) ‘Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments’, The Linguistic Review 19: 9–50.
Pylkkänen, L. (2002) Introducing Arguments, PhD dissertation, MIT.
Rackowski, A. and Richards, N. (2005) ‘Phase edge and extraction: a Tagalog case study’, Linguistic Inquiry 36: 565–99.
Radford, A. (1981) Transformational Syntax, Cambridge University Press.
Radford, A. (1988) Transformational Grammar: A First Course, Cambridge University Press.
Radford, A. (1992) ‘The acquisition of the morphosyntax of finite verbs in English’, in Meisel, J. M. (ed.), The Acquisition of Verb Placement, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 23–62.
Radford, A. (1993) ‘Head-hunting: on the trail of the nominal Janus’, in Corbett, G., Fraser, N. M. and McGlashan, S. (eds.) Heads in Grammatical Theory, Cambridge University Press, pp. 73–111.
Radford, A. (1997a) Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English, Cambridge University Press, London.
Radford, A. (1997b) Syntax: A Minimalist Introduction, Cambridge University Press, London.
Radford, A. (2004a) Minimalist Syntax: Exploring the Structure of English, Cambridge University Press.
Radford, A. (2004b) English Syntax: An Introduction, Cambridge University Press.
Radford, A. (2007) ‘Split projections, percolation, syncretism and interrogative auxiliary inversion’, Research Reports in Linguistics 53: 157–91, University of Essex.
Radford, A., Atkinson, M., Britain, D., Clahsen, H. and Spencer, A. (1999) Linguistics: An Introduction, Cambridge University Press.
Radford, A. and Vincent, M. (2007) ‘On past participle agreement in transitive clauses in French’, paper presented to XXXIII Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, available at: http://amsacta.cib.unibo.it/archive/00002397/01/PROCEEDINGS_IGG33.pdf
Ramchand, G. (1996) ‘Two subject positions in Scottish Gaelic: the syntax–semantics interface’, Natural Language Semantics 4: 165–91.
Raposo, E. (1986) ‘On the null object in European Portuguese’, in Jaeggli, O. and Silva-Corvalan, C. (eds.) Studies in Romance Linguistics, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 373–90.
Reinhart, T. (1998) ‘Wh-in-situ in the framework of the Minimalist Program’, Natural Language Semantics 6: 29–56.
Reintges, C. H., LeSourd, P. and Chung, S. (2002) ‘Movement, wh-agreement and apparent wh-in-situ’, paper presented to Workshop on Wh-Movement, University of Leiden, December 2002.
Reintges, C. H., LeSourd, P. and Chung, S. (2006) ‘Movement, wh-agreement and apparent wh-in-situ’, in Cheng and Corver 2006, pp. 165–94.
Reuland, E. (2000) ‘Revolution, discovery and an elementary principle of logic’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 843–48.
Reuland, E. (2001a) ‘Primitives of Binding’, Linguistic Inquiry 32: 439–92.
Reuland, E. (2001b) ‘Confusion compounded’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 879–85.
Reuland, E. and Everaert, M. (2001) ‘Deconstructing binding’, in Baltin and Collins 2001, pp. 634–70.
Rezac, M. (2003) ‘The fine structure of cyclic Agree’, Syntax 6: 156–82.
Rezac, M. (2006) ‘The interaction of Th/Ex and locative inversion’, Linguistic Inquiry 37: 685–97.
Richards, M. D. (2007) ‘On feature inheritance: an argument from the phase impenetrability condition’, Linguistic Inquiry 38: 563–72.
Richards, N. (1997) What Moves Where When in Which Language?PhD dissertation, MIT. (A published version appeared as Richards 2001.)
Richards, N. (2001) Movement in Language: Interactions and Architectures, Oxford University Press.
Richards, N. (2004) ‘Against bans on lowering’, Linguistic Inquiry 35: 453–63.
Ritter, E. (1991) ‘Two functional categories in noun phrases: evidence from Modern Hebrew’, in Rothstein, S. (ed.) Perspectives on Phrase Structure: Heads and Licensing, Academic Press, New York, pp. 37–62.
Rivero, M. L. (2004) ‘Spanish quirky subjects, person restrictions, and the person-case constraint’, Linguistic Inquiry 35: 494–502.
Rizzi, L. (1982) Issues in Italian Syntax, Foris, Dordrecht.
Rizzi, L. (1986) ‘Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro’, Linguistic Inquiry 17: 501–57.
Rizzi, L. (1990) Relativised Minimality, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Rizzi, L. (1997) ‘The fine structure of the left periphery’, in Haegeman, L. (ed.) Elements of Grammar, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 281–337.
Rizzi, L. (2000) ‘Remarks on early null subjects’, in Freidemann, M.-A. and Rizzi, L. (eds.) The Acquisition of Syntax, Longman, London, pp. 269–92.
Rizzi, L. (2001a) ‘Relativized minimality effects’, in Baltin and Collins 2001, pp. 89–110.
Rizzi, L. (2001b) ‘On the position “Int(errogative)” in the left periphery of the clause’, in Cinque, G. and Salvi, G. (eds.) Current Issues in Italian Syntax, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 287–96.
Rizzi, L. (2004) ‘Locality and left periphery’, in Belletti, A. (ed.) Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. III, Oxford University Press, pp. 223–51.
Rizzi, L. (2006) ‘On the form of chains: criterial positions and ECP effects’, in Cheng and Corver 2006, pp. 97–133.
Rizzi, L. and Shlonsky, U. (2005) ‘Strategies of subject extraction’, ms., Universities of Siena and Geneva.
Roberts, I. (1985) ‘Agreement parameters and the development of English modal auxiliaries’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 3: 21–58.
Roberts, I. (1987) The Representation of Implicit and Dethematized Subjects, Foris, Dordrecht.
Roberts, I. (1998) ‘Have/Be raising, Move F and Procrastinate’, Linguistic Inquiry 29: 113–25.
Roberts, I. (1993) Verbs and Diachronic Syntax, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Roberts, I. (1994) ‘Two types of head movement in Romance’, in Lightfoot & Hornstein 1994, pp. 207–42.
Roberts, I. (1997) ‘Restructuring, head movement and locality’, Linguistic Inquiry 28: 423–60.
Roberts, I. (2000) ‘Caricaturing dissent’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 849–57.
Roberts, I. (2001a) ‘Who has confused what? More on Lappin, Levine and Johnson’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 887–90.
Roberts, I. (2001b) ‘Head Movement’, in Baltin and Collins 2001, pp. 113–47.
Roberts, I. and Holmberg, A. (2006) ‘On the role of parameters in Universal Grammar: a reply to Newmeyer’, ms. University of Cambridge.
Roberts, I. and Roussou, A. (2002) ‘The Extended Projection Principle as a condition on the tense dependency’, in. Svenonius, P. (ed.) Subjects, Expletives and the EPP, Oxford University Press, pp. 125–55.
Rohrbacher, B. (1999) Morphology-Driven Syntax: A Theory of V-to-I Raising and Pro-drop, Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Romero, M. (1997) ‘The correlation between scope reconstruction and connectivity effects’, in Curtiss, E., Lyle, J. and Webster, G. (eds.) Proceedings of the XVI West Coast Conference in Formal Linguistics, CLSI, Stanford, CA, pp. 351–65.
Rosen, S. T. (1990) Argument Structure and Complex Predicates, Garland, New York.
Rosenbaum, P. S. (1965) The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions, PhD dissertation, MIT (published as Rosenbaum 1967).
Rosenbaum, P. S. (1967) The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Rosengren, I. (2002) ‘A syntactic device in the service of semantics’, Studia Linguistica 56: 145–90.
Ross, J. R. (1967) Constraints on Variables in Syntax, PhD dissertation, MIT (published as Infinite Syntax! by Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NJ, 1986).
Ross, J. R. (1969) ‘Guess who’, in Binnick, R. I., Davison, A., Green, G. M. and Morgan, J. L. (eds.) Papers from the Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, University of Chicago, pp. 252–86.
Ross, J. R. (1970) ‘On declarative sentences’, in Jacobs, R. A. and Rosenbaum, P. S. (eds.) Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Ginn, Waltham, MA, pp. 222–72.
Rothstein, S. D. (1983) The Syntactic Form of Predication, PhD dissertation, MIT.
Rudin, C. (1988) ‘On multiple questions and multiple wh-fronting’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 445–501.
Runner, J. (1998) Noun Phrase Licensing and Interpretation, Garland, New York.
Runner, J. (2006) ‘Lingering challenges to the raising-to-object and object-control constructions’, Syntax 9: 193–219.
Rupp, L. (2003) The Syntax of Imperatives in English and Germanic: Word Order Variation in the Minimalist Framework, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
Rymer, R. (1993) Genie: A Scientific Tragedy, Harper Perennial, New York.
Sabel, J. (2002) ‘A minimalist analysis of syntactic islands’, The Linguistic Review 19: 271–315.
Saddy, D. (1991) ‘Wh scope mechanisms in Bahasa Indonesia’, in L. Cheng and H. Demirdache (eds.) MIT Working Papers in Linguistics15: 183–218.
Sadler, L. and Arnold, D. J. (1994) ‘Prenominal adjectives and the phrasal/lexical distinction’, Journal of Linguistics 30: 187–226.
Safir, K. (1983) ‘On small clauses as constituents’, Linguistic Inquiry 14: 730–5.
Safir, K. (1984) ‘Missing subjects in German’, in Toman, I. (ed.) Studies in German Grammar, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 193–230.
Safir, K. (1986) Syntactic Chains, Cambridge University Press.
Safir, K. (1993) ‘Perception, selection and structural economy’, Natural Language Semantics 2: 47–70.
Sag, I. (1980) Deletion and Logical Form, Garland, New York.
Sag, I. (1997) ‘English relative clause constructions’, Journal of Linguistics 33: 431–83.
Sampson, G. (2002) ‘Exploring the richness of the stimulus’, The Linguistic Review 19: 73–104.
Sampson, G. (2005) The Language Instinct Debate, Continuum International Publishing Group, London.
Sauerland, U. (1998) The Meaning of Chains, PhD dissertation, MIT.
Sauerland, U. and Elbourne, P. (2002) ‘Total reconstruction, PF movement and derivational order’, Linguistic Inquiry 33: 283–319.
Sawada, H. (1995) Studies in English and Japanese Auxiliaries: A Multi-stratal Approach, Hituzi Syobo, Tokyo.
Scholz, B. C. and Pullum, G. K. (2002) ‘Searching for arguments to support linguistic nativism’, The Linguistic Review 19: 185–223.
Schütze, C. (1999) ‘English expletive constructions are not infected’, Linguistic Inquiry 30: 467–84.
Schütze, C. (2004) ‘Synchronic and diachronic microvariation in English do’, Lingua 114: 495–516.
Schwarz, B. (1999) ‘On the syntax of either…or’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17: 339–70.
Schwarz, B. (2000) Topics in Ellipsis, GLSA Publications, Amherst, MA.
Schwarzschild, R. (2006) ‘The role of dimensions in the syntax of noun phrases’, Syntax 9: 67–110.
Seppänen, A. and Trotta, J. (2000) ‘The wh+that pattern in present-day English’, in Kirk, J. M. (ed.) Corpora Galore: Analyses and Techniques in Describing English, Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp. 161–75.
Shlonsky, U. (1991) ‘Quantifiers as functional heads: a study of quantifier float in Hebrew’, Lingua 84: 159–80.
Sigurðsson, H. Á. (1991) ‘Icelandic case-marked PRO and the licensing of lexical arguments’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9: 327–63.
Sigurðsson, H. Á. (1996) ‘Icelandic finite verb agreement’, Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 57: 1–46.
Sigurðsson, H. Á. (2002) ‘To be an oblique subject: Russian vs. Icelandic’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 691–724.
Sigurðsson, H. Á. (2006) ‘The nominative puzzle and the Low Nominative Hypothesis’, Linguistic Inquiry 37: 289–308.
Smith, N. (1998) ‘Jackdaws, sex and language acquisition’, Glot International 3, 7: 7.
Smith, N. (2004) Chomsky: Ideas and Ideals, 2nd edn, Cambridge University Press.
Smith, N. and Cormack, A. (2002) ‘Indeterminacy, inference, iconicity and interpretation: aspects of the grammar–pragmatics interface’, in Makri-Tsilipakou, M. (ed.) Selected Papers on Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, pp. 38–53.
Sobin, N. (1997) ‘Agreement, default rules and grammatical viruses’, Linguistic Inquiry 28: 318–43.
Sobin, N. (2002) ‘The Comp-trace effect, the adverb effect, and minimal CP’, Journal of Linguistics 38: 527–60.
Sobin, N. (2003) ‘Negative inversion as non-movement’, Syntax 6: 183–212.
Sobin, N. (2004) ‘Expletive constructions are not “lower right corner” movement constructions’, Linguistic Inquiry 35: 503–8.
Sorace, A. (2000) ‘Gradients in auxiliary selection with intransitive verbs’, Language 76: 859–90.
Speas, P. (1986) Adjunction and Projections in Syntax, PhD dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Spencer, A. J. (1991) Morphological Theory, Blackwell, Oxford.
Spinillo, M. G. (2004) Reconceptualising the English Determiner Class, PhD dissertation, University College London.
Sportiche, D. (1988) ‘A theory of floating quantifiers and its corollaries for constituent structure’, Linguistic Inquiry 19: 425–49.
Sportiche, D. (1998) ‘Movement, agreement and case’, in Partitions and Atoms of Clause Structure, Routledge, London, pp. 88–243.
Sprouse, J. (2007) ‘Rhetorical questions and wh-movement’, Linguistic Inquiry 38: 572–80.
Stepanov, A. (2001) ‘Late adjunction and minimalist phrase structure’, Syntax 4: 94–125.
Stockwell, R., Schachter, P. and Hall Partee, B. (1973) The Major Syntactic Structures of English, Holt Rinehart and Winston, New York.
Stowell, T. (1981) Origins of Phrase Structure, PhD dissertation, MIT.
Stowell, T. (1982) ‘The tense of infinitives’, Linguistic Inquiry 13: 561–70.
Stowell, T. (1983) ‘Subjects across categories’, The Linguistic Review, 2: 285–312.
Stowell, T. (1991) ‘Small clause restructuring’, in Freidin, R. (ed.) Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 182–218.
Stroik, T. (1990) ‘Adverbs as V-sisters’, Linguistic Inquiry 21: 654–61.
Stroik, T. (2001) ‘On the light verb hypothesis’, Linguistic Inquiry 32: 362–9.
Suñer, M. (1984) ‘Controlled pro’, in Baldi, P. (ed.) Papers from the XIIth Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, University Park Press, Baltimore, pp. 254–73.
Suñer, M. (2000) ‘The syntax of direct quotes with special reference to Spanish and English’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 525–78.
Surányi, B. (2006) ‘Mechanisms of wh-saturation and interpretation in multiple wh-movement’, in Cheng and Corver 2006, pp. 288–318.
Svenonius, P. (2002a) ‘Case is uninterpretable aspect’, www.hum.uit.no/a/svenonius/paperspage.html
Svenonius, P. (2002b) ‘Icelandic case and the structure of events’, www.hum.uit.no/a/svenonius/paperspage.html
Svenonius, P. (2004) ‘On the edge’, in Adger, D., Cat, C. and Tsoulas, G. (eds.), Peripheries: Syntactic Edges and their Effects, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 261–87.
Tallerman, M. O. (1993) ‘Case assignment and the order of functional projections in Welsh’, in Siewierska, A. (ed.), Eurotyp Working Papers, Programme in Language Typology, European Science Foundation, Berlin, pp. 1–41.
Tamburelli, M. (2006) ‘Remarks on richness’, UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 18: 1–17.
Tamburelli, M. (2007) The Role of Lexical Acquisition in Simultaneous Bilingualism, PhD dissertation, University College London.
Taraldsen, T. (1990) ‘D-projections and N-projections in Norwegian’, in Nespor, M. and Mascarò, J. (eds.) Grammar in Progress, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 419–31.
Ten Hacken, P. (2001) Review of Radford (1997a/b), Natural Language Engineering 7/1.
Tenny, C. (1987) Grammaticalizing Aspect and Affectedness, PhD dissertation, MIT.
Thomas, M. (2002) ‘Development of the concept of “the poverty of stimulus”’, The Linguistic Review 19: 51–71.
Thompson, E. (2006) ‘The structure of bounded events’, Linguistic Inquiry 37: 211–28.
Thornton, R. (1995) ‘Referentiality and wh-movement in child English: juvenile D-linkuency’, Language Acquisition 4: 139–75.
Ticio, M. E. (2003) On the Structure of DPs, PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Ticio, M. E. (2005) ‘Locality and anti-locality in Spanish DPs’, Syntax 8: 229–86.
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I. (1988) ‘The origins and development of periphrastic auxiliary do: a case of destigmatisation’, Dutch Working Papers in English Language and Linguistics 3: 1–30.
Toda, T. (2007) ‘So-inversion revisited’, Linguistic Inquiry 38: 188–95.
Torrego, E. (1984) ‘On inversion in Spanish and some of its effects’, Linguistic Inquiry 15: 103–29.
Toyoshima, T. (2000) ‘Heading for their own places’, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 36: 93–108.
Traugott, E. C. (1972) A History of English Syntax: A Transformational Approach to the History of English Sentence Structure, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
Travis, L. (1984) Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation, PhD dissertation, MIT.
Uchibori, A. (2000) The syntax of subjunctive complements: Evidence from Japanese, unpublished dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Ura, H. (1993) ‘On feature-checking for wh-traces’, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 18: 243–80.
Ura, H. (2001) ‘Local economy and generalized pied-piping’, The Linguistic Review 18: 169–91.
Uriagereka, J. (1988) On Government, PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Uriagereka, J. (1998) Rhyme and Reason, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Uriagereka, J. (2000) ‘On the emptiness of “design” polemics’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 18: 863–71.
Uriagereka, J. (2001) ‘Cutting derivational options’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 891–900.
Vainikka, A. and Levy, Y. (1999) ‘Empty subjects in Finnish and Hebrew’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17: 613–71.
Craenenbroeck, J. and Dicken, M. (2006) ‘Ellipsis and EPP repair’, Linguistic Inquiry 37: 653–64.
Eynde, F. (2006) ‘NP-internal agreement and the structure of the noun phrase’, Journal of Linguistics 42: 139–86.
Gelderen, E. (2004) Grammaticalization as Economy, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Langendonck, W. (1994) ‘Determiners as heads?’, Cognitive Linguistics 5: 243–59.
Riemsdijk, H. (1989) ‘Movement and regeneration’, in Benincà, P. (ed.) Dialectal Variation and the Theory of Grammar, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 105–36.
Verkuyl, H. J., Swart, H. and Hout, A. (2005) Perspectives on Aspect, Springer, Dordrecht.
Vikner, S. (1995) Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in Germanic Languages, Oxford University Press.
Visser, F. T. (1966) A Historical Syntax of the English Language, vol. II, Brill, Leiden.
Fintel, K. (1999) ‘NPI licensing, Strawson entailment and context dependency’, Journal of Semantics 16: 97–148.
Watanabe, A. (2001) ‘Wh-in-situ languages’, in Baltin and Collins 2001, pp. 203–25.
Watanabe, A. (2004) ‘The genesis of Negative Concord: syntax and morphology of Negative Doubling’, Linguistic Inquiry 35: 559–612.
Watanabe, A. (2006) ‘The pied-piper feature’, in Cheng and Corver 2006, pp. 47–70.
Wexler, K. (1994) ‘Optional infinitives, head movement and the economy of derivations’, in Lightfoot & Hornstein 1994, pp. 305–50.
Wexler, K. (1998) ‘Very early parameter-setting and the unique checking constraint: a new explanation of the optional infinitive stage’, Lingua 106: 23–79.
Williams, E. (1980) ‘Predication’, Linguistic Inquiry 11: 203–38.
Williams, E. (1983) ‘Against small clauses’, Linguistic Inquiry 14: 287–308.
Williams, E. (2006) ‘The subject-predicate theory of there’, Linguistic Inquiry 36: 648–51.
Willis, D. (2000) ‘On the distribution of resumptive pronouns and wh-trace in Welsh’, Journal of Linguistics 36: 531–73.
Wiltschko, M. (1998) ‘On the syntax and semantics of (relative) pronouns and determiners’, Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 2: 143–81.
Wiltschko, M. (2001) ‘The syntax of pronouns: evidence from Halkomelem Salish’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 157–95.
Wolfram, W. (1971) ‘Black–white speech differences revisited’, in Wolfram, W. and Clark, N. H. (eds.), Black–White Speech Relationships, Center for Applied Linguistics, Washington, DC, pp. 139–61.
Woolford, E. (1991) ‘VP-internal subjects in VSO and nonconfigurational languages’, Linguistic Inquiry 22: 503–40.
Woolford, E. (2006) ‘Lexical case, inherent case and argument structure’, Linguistic Inquiry 37: 111–30.
Xu, L. (2003) ‘Choice between the overt and the covert’, Transactions of the Philological Society 101: 81–107.
Yang, C. D. (1999) ‘Unordered Merge and its linearization’, Syntax 1: 38–64.
Yang, H. (2006) ‘On overt and covert wh- and relative movement in Hindi and Punjabi’, in Cheng and Corver 2006, pp. 135–64.
Zagona, K. (1987) Verb Phrase Syntax, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Zamparelli, R. (2000) Layers in the Determiner Phrase, Garland, New York.
Zanuttini, R. (1991) Syntactic Properties of Sentential Negation: A Comparative Study of Romance Languages, PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Zlatić, L. (1997) The Structure of the Serbian Noun Phrase, PhD dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
Zoerner, E. C. (1995) Co-ordination: The Syntax of &P, PhD dissertation, University of California, Irvine.
Zwart, C. J.-W. (2001) ‘Syntactic and phonological verb movement’, Syntax 4: 34–62.
Zwicky, A. (2002) ‘I wonder what kind of construction that this kind of example illustrates’, in Beaver, D., Martínez, L. D. Casillas, Clark, B. Z. and Kaufmann, S. (eds.) The Construction of Meaning, CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp. 219–48.
