Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. The Cambridge Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics
  • Cited by 95
      • Show more authors
      • You may already have access via personal or institutional login
    • Select format
    • Publisher:
      Cambridge University Press
      Publication date:
      05 June 2012
      15 April 2010
      ISBN:
      9780511845239
      9780521888981
      9780521717724
      DOI:
      https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845239
      Dimensions:
      (247 x 174 mm)
      Weight & Pages:
      0.82kg, 344 Pages
      Dimensions:
      (247 x 174 mm)
      Weight & Pages:
      0.68kg, 342 Pages
      • Subjects:
      Philosophy: General Interest, Computer Science, Philosophy, Computing: General Interest
    You may already have access via personal or institutional login
    • Selected: Digital
    Add to cart View cart Buy from Cambridge.org
    Subjects:
    Philosophy: General Interest, Computer Science, Philosophy, Computing: General Interest
    Information

    Book description

    Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) have profoundly changed many aspects of life, including the nature of entertainment, work, communication, education, healthcare, industrial production and business, social relations and conflicts. They have had a radical and widespread impact on our moral lives and hence on contemporary ethical debates. The Cambridge Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics, first published in 2010, provides an ambitious and authoritative introduction to the field, with discussions of a range of topics including privacy, ownership, freedom of speech, responsibility, technological determinism, the digital divide, cyber warfare, and online pornography. It offers an accessible and thoughtful survey of the transformations brought about by ICTs and their implications for the future of human life and society, for the evaluation of behaviour, and for the evolution of moral values and rights. It will be a valuable book for all who are interested in the ethical aspects of the information society in which we live.

    Reviews

    "...This five-part work examines difficulties in the field of information ethics and offers practical applications and criticisms... Recommended..."
    --B. G. Turner, Faulkner University, CHOICE

    "...This is a rich and fascinating book, bringing to interpretative debates muchthat has been hitherto unknown. The chapters are long and complex, and theargument is multidimensional and far-reaching."
    --George Lăzăroiu, PhD, Institute of Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences, New York, Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice

    Refine List

    Actions for selected content:

    Select all | Deselect all
    • View selected items
    • Export citations
    • Download PDF (zip)
    • Save to Kindle
    • Save to Dropbox
    • Save to Google Drive

    Save Search

    You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

    Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
    Cancel
    ×

    Contents

    Contents
    • 1 - Ethics after the Information Revolution
      pp 3-19
    • View abstract

      Summary

      This chapter discusses some conceptual undercurrents, which flow beneath the surface of the literature on information and computer ethics (ICE). It focuses on the potential impact of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) on our lives. Because of their 'data superconductivity', ICTs are well known for being among the most influential factors that affect the ontological friction in the infosphere. As a full expression of techne, the information society has already posed fundamental ethical problems, whose complexity and global dimensions are rapidly evolving. The task is to formulate an ethical framework that can treat the infosphere as a new environment worth the moral attention and care of the human inforgs inhabiting it. We have begun to see ourselves as connected informational organisms (inforgs), not through some fanciful transformation in our body, but, more seriously and realistically, through the re-ontologization of our environment and of ourselves.
    • 2 - The historical roots of information and computer ethics
      pp 20-38
    • View abstract

      Summary

      This chapter examines some metaphysical assumptions of Aristotle and Wiener that can be seen as philosophical roots of today's information and computer ethics. It briefly describes Floridi's new 'macroethics', which he calls information ethics to distinguish Floridi's 'macroethics' from the general field of information ethics that includes, for example, agent ethics, computer ethics, Internet ethics, journalism ethics, library ethics, bioengineering ethics, neurotechnology ethics, etc. In his book, Cybernetics: or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine, Wiener viewed animals and computerized machines as cybernetic entities. Beginning in 1950, with the publication of The Human Use of Human Beings, Wiener assumed that cybernetic machines will join humans as active participants in society. In Moor's computer ethics theory, respect for 'core values' is a central aspect of his 'just consequentialism' theory of justice, as well as his influential analysis of human privacy.
    • 3 - Values in technology and disclosive computer ethics
      pp 41-58
    • View abstract

      Summary

      This chapter focuses on the embedded values approach, which holds that computer systems and software are capable of harbouring embedded or 'builtin' values, and on two derivative approaches, disclosive computer ethics and value-sensitive design (VSD). Disclosive computer ethics focuses on morally opaque practices in computing and aims to identify, analyse and morally evaluate such practices. Many practices in computing are morally opaque because they depend on computer systems that contain embedded values that are not recognized as such. Therefore, disclosive ethics frequently focuses on such embedded values. Value-sensitive design is a framework for accounting for values in a comprehensive manner in the design of systems and software. The embedded values approach could benefit from more theoretical and conceptual work, particularly regarding the very notion of an embedded value and its relation to both the material features of artefacts and their context of use.
    • 4 - The use of normative theories in computer ethics
      pp 59-76
    • View abstract

      Summary

      Information Ethics is a recent alternative to traditional ethical theory to account for the moral phenomena and is the subject of further research to investigate how it can be made to bear upon the practical problems in Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) and to demonstrate that it has an explanatory and justificatory surplus compared to the traditional ethical normative theories. Floridi's Information Ethics provides a high-level value theory which applies to the ICTs domain, which at the same time allows for specification at the mid-level and lower levels of abstraction and specification. Mid-level theories may in turn be used as sources of moral arguments in the relevant empirical domains, where conceptual reconstructions have prepared the ground for their application. Reconstructed concepts, e.g. contestatory democracy, justice as fairness, privacy as data protection, function as high-level architectural principles for the design of information systems and ICTs applications.
    • 5 - Information ethics
      pp 77-98
    • View abstract

      Summary

      Information Ethics (IE) has come to mean different things to different researchers working in a variety of disciplines, including computer ethics, business ethics, medical ethics, computer science and information science. The chapter explores what IE is and what counts as a moral agent and moral patient according to IE. It questions our responsibilities as moral agents, according to IE and the fundamental principles of IE. The resource-product-target (RPT) model, summarized in this chapter, helps one to get some initial orientation in the multiplicity of issues belonging to different interpretations of IE. The chapter also gives an overview of Information Ethics understood as a macroethics. Since the early nineties, when the author first introduced IE as an environmental macroethics and a foundationalist approach to computer ethics, some standard objections have circulated that seem to be based on a few basic misunderstandings.
    • 6 - Social issues in computer ethics
      pp 101-115
    • View abstract

      Summary

      This chapter concentrates on three important social issues in computer ethics: the question of intellectual property (IP), issues related to digital divides, and issues arising out of employment and work. It clarifies the philosophical underpinning of those social issues in computer ethics related to ownership and property in assets that have a form different from the physical entities for which the idea of property was originally developed. With regards to ethical issues raised by information and communication technology (ICT), two groups of intellectual creations currently constitute the main items of IP: software and content. The chapter addresses the ethically and philosophically interesting aspects of digital divides which develops the argument that digital divides share relevant aspects with other social issues of computer ethics. Work and employment issues are driven to a large extent by business interests, for example where ICT leads to a higher degree of employee surveillance or self-surveillance.
    • 7 - Rights and computer ethics
      pp 116-132
    • View abstract

      Summary

      This chapter explores the philosophical theories that attempt to provide guidance when determining the best way to balance the rights of the individual user of Information and Computer Technologies (ICTs) with the legitimate public concerns of the societies impacted by these technologies. It looks at the philosophical justifications for free speech and privacy, as these play out in the use of ICTs where anonymous speech can exacerbate the conflicts regarding pornography, hate speech, privacy and political dissent. The Principle of Harm can be used to distinguish hate speech from the heated and vigorous debates that race and religion can both engender. The Gossip 2.0 phenomenon is a place where free speech and privacy collide head-on. This is antisocial networking, where the dark side of social interaction is leveraged by ICTs to gain a force and audience far beyond the restroom walls where this kind of communication is typically found.
    • 8 - Conflict, security and computer ethics
      pp 133-148
    • View abstract

      Summary

      This chapter throws light on ethical concerns regarding cyber war or cyber terror. Computers have contributed to revitalizing the realm of conflict in three principal areas. First, in terms of conventional military operations, computers have completely revolutionized communications, making complex new modes of field operations possible. Next, computers have made it possible to analyse oceans of sensor data quite swiftly, enabling the military, intelligence and law enforcement communities to take action in ever more timely and targeted ways. This powerful new analytic capacity, it must be noted, can serve aggressors or defenders equally well, whether they are nations or terrorist networks. Last, the growing dependence of societies and their militaries on advanced information and communications technologies has given birth to cyberspace-based forms of strategic attack, designed to cause costly, crippling disruptions. In sum, whether nation or network, there may be sound ethical reasons for embracing cyber warfare and/or cyber terror.
    • 9 - Personal values and computer ethics
      pp 149-162
    • View abstract

      Summary

      This chapter provides a means of thinking of inequalities in relation to the design and use of information and communications technologies (ICTs), arguing that equality is often expressed as a liberal value, which rests on a view of the relationship of technology and society that is determinist in inspiration. This is particularly important when the adoption of ICTs is increasingly bound up with identity, in making communities, in gender identity, in terms of the construction of disability and in terms of age. Hopes for virtual communities were initially often based on a utopian vision. The experiences of young people using social networking technologies, women in the IT industry and on the Internet, disabled people accessing ICTs and older users, particularly of the World Wide Web, demonstrate a complex picture of a world which is still unequal and where old inequalities prevail.
    • 10 - Global information and computer ethics
      pp 163-180
    • View abstract

      Summary

      This chapter discusses three issues distinctively evoked by globally diffused Information and Communication Technologies (ICT): (i) the digital divide, (ii) online global citizenship and (iii) global deliberation and democratization. It explores ethical pluralism as a primary framework within which we may take up a global range of diverse ethical frameworks and decision-making traditions used to analyse and reflect upon characteristic issues of Information and Computing Ethics (ICE). In the course of the analysis the chapter uses the core issue of privacy as primary example. ICTs are a primary driver of globalization as they make possible trade, financial transactions and the relocation of labour into lower-cost labour markets. Ethical pluralism provides us with a way of understanding how a single norm may via the reflection and application of judgement apply in very different contexts in very different ways, with regard to notions of privacy in diverse Western cultures.
    • 11 - Computer ethics and applied contexts
      pp 181-198
    • View abstract

      Summary

      This chapter explores the role computer ethics and its implications on all applied ethical fields, in particular on media ethics, business ethics, criminal justice ethics, medical ethics, bioethics and environmental ethics. It discusses in particular the role played by information and communication technology (ICT) in a variety of contexts. Freedom of speech and expression are of central importance to both computer and media ethics, and because of the decentralized and global nature of the Internet, pornography, hate language and various illegal activities are much more difficult to control than in more traditional media. The chapter concentrates on two aspects where computers have made a significant difference: monitoring and surveillance in relation to privacy and trust, and biometrics. This chapter focuses ICT in medical contexts particularly data protection related to medical records and online consultation. It focuses on the role of ICTs in bioethics with a special focus on modern genomics.
    • 12 - The ethics of IT-artefacts
      pp 201-218
    • View abstract

      Summary

      This chapter provides an overview of the main approaches in the field of Science and technology studies (STS) with regard to technical artefacts. It describes various kinds of increasingly capable information technology (IT) artefacts as agents and discusses what kind of attributions (intentionality, selfrepresentation, attribution of intentionality to others by an artefact, etc.) might be meaningful. The chapter discusses the question of whether there is anything that sets IT-artefacts apart from technical artefacts. It argues that we might have to accept the idea that IT-artefacts possess some form of intentionality independent of humans in order to make sense of their behaviour and their moral status. The question of whether artefacts need mental states in order to count as moral agents focuses on what is required for moral agency and, in particular, on whether IT-artefacts need mental states in order to be able to act morally.
    • 13 - Artificial life, artificial agents, virtual realities: technologies of autonomous agency
      pp 219-233
    • View abstract

      Summary

      This chapter discusses ethical issues arising in connection with artificial life (non carbon-based), artificial agents (physically embodied robots and software agents or 'bots') and virtual reality (VR). It gives a brief survey of the technologies involved, subdividing both artificial agents and virtual reality to produce a list of five different kinds of technology. The five kinds of technology are: anthropomorphic VR, machine-centred VR, virtual artificial agents (aka bots), embodied artificial agents, and ALife. The chapter begins by clarifying the kinds of technology to be discussed under the headings of artificial life, artificial agents and virtual reality. For artificial life, robots and software bots, there are ethical questions concerning the agency inherent in these systems themselves, whether they can be made to respect ethical boundaries, and the ways in which they may lead humanity down a path which reduces human freedom or autonomy.
    • 14 - On new technologies
      pp 234-248
    • View abstract

      Summary

      This chapter considers prominent ethical concerns that have been raised about newly introduced technologies and about technologies that might be implemented in the future. It focuses on concerns about privacy, individual autonomy and threats to safety. A very prominent form of concern about threats to safety, in the discussion of possible future technologies, addresses catastrophic future scenarios. Concerns about autonomy have a tendency to become mixed up with concerns about the future of the human species. Examples of Closed Circuit Television (CCTV), Global Positioning System (GPS), Radio Frequency Identity (RFID) are discussed under the context of privacy. One of the more important arguments for respecting the informational privacy of individuals is that, if people's activities are unknown to others then they cannot be deliberately interfered with by others. The chapter also considers some famous novels that exemplify themes recurrent in much contemporary extemporizing about the dangers of future technology.
    • 15 - The foundationalist debate in computer ethics
      pp 251-270
    • View abstract

      Summary

      This chapter gives a brief analysis of a model defended by Floridi and Sanders for examining foundational issues in computer ethics (CE).It proposes an alternative model, which frames CE's foundationalist debate in terms of three principal questions. The first question is regarding CE's legitimacy in the field of applied ethics. The second question is concerned with CE's uniqueness in a philosophically interesting sense. The third question is whether CE requires a new ethical framework. In analysing the questions, the chapter argues that CE qualifies as a legitimate field of applied ethics that warrants philosophical analysis and concludes that there were no convincing reasons to believe that computing technology has either (i) generated any unique or new ethical issues, or (ii) introduced any new ethical objects. It states that there are no compelling reasons to believe that a new normative ethical theory is required for CE.
    References
    References
    Ackerman, B. and Fishkin, J. 2004. Deliberation Day. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
    Adam, A. 1998. Artificial Knowing: Gender and the Thinking Machine. New York and London: Routledge.
    Adam, A. 2002. ‘Cyberstalking and Internet Pornography’, Ethics and Information Technology 4, 133–142.
    Adam, A. 2005. Gender, Ethics and Information Technology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Adam, A., Griffiths, M., Keogh, C., Moore, K., Richardson, H. and Tattersall, A. 2006. ‘Being an it in IT – Gendered Identities in the IT Workplace’, European Journal of Information Systems 15(4), 368–378.
    Adam, A. and Kreps, D. 2006. ‘Enabling or Disabling Technologies? A Critical Approach to Web Accessibility’, Information Technology and People 19(3), 203–218.
    Adams, J. 1998. The Next World War: Computers Are the Weapons and the Front Line is Everywhere. New York: Simon and Schuster.
    Adler, M. and Posner, E. A. (eds.) 2001. Cost-Benefit Analysis: Economic, Philosophical and Legal Perspectives. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Agre, P. and Mailloux, C. 1997. ‘Social Choice about Privacy: Intelligent Vehicle-Highway Systems in the United States’, in Friedman, B. (ed.), Human Values and the Design of Computer Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Akrich, M. 1992. ‘The Description of Technical Objects’, in Bijker, W. and Law, J. E., (eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Albrecht, K. and Macintyre, L. 2006. The Spychips Threat: Why Christians Should Resist RFID and Electronic Surveillance. Nashville: Nelson Current.
    Albrechtslund, A. 2008. ‘Online Social Networking as Participatory Surveillance’, First Monday 13(3), 3 March. www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2142/1949
    Alexander, J. 1999. Future War. New York: St. Martin's Press.
    Alterman, A., 2003. ‘“A Piece of Yourself”: Ethical Issues in Biometric Identification’, Ethics and Information Technology 5(3),139–150.
    Anderson, M. and Anderson, S. L. 2006. ‘Computing an Ethical Theory with Multiple Prima Facie Duties’, in Proceeding EthicALife/ALifeX.
    Anderson, M. and Anderson, S. L. 2007. ‘Machine Ethics: Creating an Ethical Intelligent Agent’, Artificial Intelligence Magazine 28(4), Winter, 15.
    Anderson, M. and Anderson, S. L. 2008. ‘Ethical Healthcare Agents. Advanced Computational Intelligence Paradigms’, in Jain, L. C. (ed.), Healthcare-3 pp. 233–257. Berlin: Springer.
    Anderson, N. 2007. ‘California Outlaws the Forced Subdermal RFID Tagging of Humans’, http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070904-california-outlaws-forced-rfid-tagging-of-humans.html
    Anscombe, G. E. M. 1958. ‘Modern Moral Philosophy’, Philosophy33.
    Arendt, H. 1958. The Human Condition (2nd edn). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Arendt, H. 1968. ‘Crisis in Culture’, in Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought, pp. 197–227. New York: Meridian.
    Aristotle, , On the Motion of Animals, On the Soul, Nicomachean Ethics.
    Arkin, R. 2004. ‘Bombs, Bonding, and Bondage: Human-Robot Interaction and Related Ethical Issues’. Paper presented at the First International Conference on Roboethics, San Remo, Italy, January 2004.
    Arkin, R. 2007. Governing Lethal Behavior: Embedding Ethics in a Hybrid Deliberative/Reactive Robot Architecture. Technical Report GIT-GVU-07–11, College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology.
    Arquilla, J. and Ronfeldt, D. 1997. In Athena's Camp: Preparing for Conflict in the Information Age. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
    Audi, R. 2007. Moral Value and Human Diversity. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Avgerou, C. 2003. ‘The Link Between ICT and Economic Growth in the Discourse of Development’, in Korpeal, M., Montealegre, R. and Poulymenakou, A. 2003, Organizational Information Systems in the Context of Globalization, pp. 373–386. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
    Bailenson, J. N., Yee, N., Blascovich, J. and Guadagno, R. E. 2008. ‘Transformed Social Interaction in Mediated Interpersonal Communication’, in Konijn, E., Tanis, M., Utz, S. and Linden, A. (eds.), Mediated Interpersonal Communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Bainbridge, W. S. and Roco, M. C. (eds.) 2006. Managing Nano-bio-info-cogno Innovations: Converging Technologies in Society. Dordrecht: Springer.
    Barab, S., Dodge, T., Thomas, M. K., Jackson, C. and Tuzun, H. 2007. ‘Our Designs and the Social Agendas They Carry’, Journal of the Learning Sciences 16, 263–305.
    Barbaro, M. and Zeller Jr., T. 2006. ‘A Face is Exposed for AOL Searcher No. 4417749’, The New York Times, 9 August.
    Barcan Marcus, R. 1987. ‘Moral Dilemmas and Consistency’, in Gowans (1987), pp. 188–204.
    Barger, R. N. 2008. Computer Ethics: A Case-Based Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Barlow, J. 1995. ‘Coming into the Country’, in Johnson, D. G. and Nissenbaum, H. (eds.), Computers, Ethics and Social Value, pp. 15–18. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
    Barnaby, F. 1986. The Automated Battlefield. New York: The Free Press.
    Barnes, S. B. 2006. ‘A Privacy Paradox: Social Networking in the United States’, First Monday 11(9). www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_9/barnes/index.html#author
    Beauchamp, T. L. and Childress, J. F. 2001. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Beckenstein, J. D. 2003. ‘Information in the Holographic Universe’, Scientific American, August, 58–65.
    Beitz, C. 2001. ‘Does Global Inequality Matter?’, in Pogge, T. W., Global Justice, pp. 106–122. Oxford: Blackwell.
    Bell, T. W. 1995. ‘Anonymous Speech,’ Wired, October, http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/3.10/cyber.rights.html.
    Bellin, D. and Chapman, G. 1987. Computers in Battle: Will They Work? New York: Harcourt, Brace and Jovanovich.
    Benhabib, S. 1992. Situating the Self. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    Benkler, Y. 2001. ‘The Battle over the Institutional Ecosystem in the Digital Environment’, Communications of the ACM 44(2), 84–90.
    Berlin, I. 1957. The Hedgehog and the Fox: An Essay on Tolstoy's View of History. New York: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
    Berlin, I. 1958. Two Concepts of Liberty: An Inaugural Lecture Delivered before the University of Oxford on 31 October 1958. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    Berlin, I. 1969. Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    Bijker, W. and Law, J. (eds.) 1992. Shaping Technology/Building Society. Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Black, H. C. 1990. Black's Law Dictionary: Definitions of the Terms and Phrases of American and English Jurisprudence, Ancient and Modern (6th edn). St Paul, MN: West Publishing.
    Blackwell, A. H. 2003. ‘Don't Expect Any Privacy in the Workplace’, WWWiz.Com. wwwiz.com/issue45/
    Bloor, D. 1976. Knowledge and Social Imagery. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    Boella, G. and Torre, L. 2004. ‘Fulfilling or Violating Obligations in Normative Multiagent Systems’, IAT 2004, 483–486.
    Bohman, J. 1996. Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Boltuc, P. (ed.) 2008. APA Newsletter on Computers and Philosophy, Spring 7(2) and Fall 8(1).
    Boran, M. 2007. ‘Data Centres Make Big Carbon Footprint’, Siliconrepublic.com, 10 October. www.siliconrepublic.com/news/news.nv?storyid=single9387
    Boscarol, M. 2006. ‘Working with Others: Accessibility and User Research’, Accessibility 225, 9 October 09. http://alistapart.com/articles/workingwithothers
    Bostrom, N. 2002. ‘Existential Risks: Analyzing Human Extinction Scenarios and Related Hazards’, Journal of Evolution and Technology 9, 1–30.
    Bostrom, N. 2003. ‘The Transhumanist FAQ, Version 2.1’, www.transhumanism.org/resources/faq.html
    Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Trans. Nice, R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Bowker, G. C. and Star, S. L. 1999. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Boston: MIT Press.
    Boyle, James. 2001. ‘A Politics of Intellectual Property: Environmentalism for the Net?’, in Spinello, R. A. and Tavani, H. T. (eds.), Readings in Cyberethics, pp. 231–251. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
    Brandt, D. and Henning, K. 2002. ‘Information and Communication Technologies: Perspectives and Their Impact on Society’, AI and Society 16(3), 210–223.
    Bratman, M. E. 1987. Intention, Plans and Practical Reasoning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    Breazeal, C. 2002. Designing Sociable Robots. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Brey, P. 1998. ‘The Politics of Computer Systems and the Ethics of Design’, in Hoven, J. (ed.), Computer Ethics: Philosophical Enquiry. Rotterdam: Rotterdam University Press.
    Brey, P. 1999a. ‘Method in Computer Ethics: Towards a Multi-Level Interdisciplinary Approach’, Ethics and Information Technology 2(3), 1–5.
    Brey, P. 1999b. ‘The Ethics of Representation and Action in Virtual Reality’, Ethics and Information Technology 1(1), 5–14.
    Brey, P. 1999c. ‘Worker Autonomy and the Drama of Digital Networks in Organizations’, Journal of Business Ethics 22(1), 15–25.
    Brey, P. 2000. ‘Disclosive Computer Ethics’, Computers and Society 30(4), 10–16.
    Brey, P. 2008. ‘Virtual Reality and Computer Simulation’, in Himma, K. E. and Tavani, H. T. (eds.), The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
    Briggle, A., Mitcham, C. and Ryder, M. 2005. ‘Technology: Overview’, in Mitcham, C. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Science, Technology and Ethics, pp. 908–1912. Detroit: Thomson, Gale.
    Brin, D. 1999. The Transparent Society: Will Technology Force Us to Choose between Privacy and Freedom? New York: Perseus Books.
    Bringsjord, S. 2007. ‘Ethical Robots: The Future Can Heed Us’, AI and Society (online).
    Britz, J. 2007. ‘The Internet: The Missing Link Between the Information Rich and the Information Poor?’, in Capurro, R., Frühbauer, J. and Hausmaningers, T. (eds.), Localizing the Internet: Ethical aspects in intercultural perspective, pp. 265–277. Munich: Wilhelm Fink.
    Brooks, R. A. 2002. Flesh and Machines: How Robots Will Change Us. New York: Pantheon.
    Brooks, R. 2007. ‘Robotkind: On the Battlefield and in the Home’, Lecture to the British Computer Society, June 2007. Video online at http://74.125.95.132/server.php?show=ConWebDoc.10440
    Brown, C. 2003. Lost Liberties: Ashcroft and the Assault on Personal Freedom. New York: The New Press.
    Buchanan, E. A. 2004. ‘Ethical Considerations for the Information Professions’, in Spinello, R. A. and Tavani, H. T., (eds.), Readings in Cyberethics (2nd edn), pp. 613–624. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
    Buchanan, E. and Campbell, J. 2005. ‘New Threats to Intellectual Freedom: The Loss of the Information Commons through Law and Technology in the US’, in Spinello, R. A. and Tavani, H. T. (eds.), Intellectual Property Rights in a Networked World: Theory and Practice, pp. 205–242. Hershey, PA: INFOSCI.
    Budinger, T. F. and Budinger, M. D. 2006. Ethics of Emerging Technologies: Scientific Facts and Moral Challenges. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
    Burk, D. 2001. ‘Copyrightable Functions and Patentable Speech’, Communications of the ACM 44(2), 69–76.
    Burk, D. 2007. ‘Privacy and Property in the Global Datasphere’, in Hongladarom, S. and Ess, C. (eds.), Information Technology Ethics: Cultural Perspectives, pp. 94–107. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
    ,Business Services Industry, 2007. ‘TopTenREVIEWS Reports Worldwide Pornography Market at Least $97 Billion; Every Second 28,258 Internet Users View Pornography’, bNet Business Network (12 March). http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_/ai_n27186769
    Butler, S, 1985 (1872), Erewhon. London: Penguin Books.
    Bynum, T. W. 1985. Editor's Introduction to James Moor, ‘What is Computer Ethics?’, Metaphilosophy 16(4), 263–265.
    Bynum, T. W. 1986. ‘Aristotle's Theory of Human Action’, a doctoral dissertation at the Graduate School of the City University of New York. www.southernct.edu/organizations/rccs/
    Bynum, T. W. 2000a. ‘The Foundation of Computer Ethics’, Computers and Society 30(2), 6–13.
    Bynum, T. W. 2000b. ‘A Very Short History of Computer Ethics’, Newsletter of the American Philosophical Association on Philosophy and Computing. www.southernct.edu/organizations/rccs/resources/research/introduction/bynum_shrt_hist.html
    Bynum, T. W. 2001. ‘Computer Ethics: Basic Concepts and Historical Overview’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-computer/
    Bynum, T. W. 2004. ‘Ethical Challenges to Citizens of the “Automatic Age”: Norbert Wiener on the Information Society’, Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 2(2), 65–74.
    Bynum, T. W. 2005. ‘Norbert Wiener's Vision: The Impact of the “Automatic Age” on Our Moral Lives’, in Cavalier, R. (ed.), The Impact of the Internet on Our Moral Lives, pp. 11–25. Albany, NY: State University of New YorkPress.
    Bynum, T. W. 2006a. ‘Flourishing Ethics’, Ethics and Information Technology 8(4), 157–173.
    Bynum, T. W. 2006b. ‘A Copernican Revolution in Ethics?’, in Dodig-Crnkovi, G. and Stuart, S. (eds.), Computing, Philosophy, and Cognitive Science. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press.
    Bynum, T. W. and Rogerson, S. 1996, ‘Global Information Ethics: Introduction and Overview’, Science and Engineering Ethics 2(2), 131–136.
    Camp, J. 1999. ‘Democratic Implications of Internet Protocols,’ The Information Society 15, 249–256.
    Camp, L. J. 2003. ‘First Principles of Copyright for DRM Design’, IEEE Internet Computing 7(3), 59–65.
    Canellopoulou-Bottis, M. and Himma, K. E. 2008. ‘The Digital Divide: A Perspective for the Future’, in Himma, K. E. and Tavani, H. T. (eds.), The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics, pp. 621–637. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
    Castells, M. 2000. The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture. Volume I: The Rise of the Network Society (2nd edn). Oxford: Blackwell.
    Chakraborty, R., Stivers, D. N., Su, B., Zhong, Y. and Budowle, B. 1999. ‘The Utility of Short Tandem Repeat Loci Beyond Human Identification: Implications for Development of New DNA Typing’, Electrophoresis 20(8), 1682–1696.
    Chan, J. 2003. ‘Confucian Attitudes towards Ethical Pluralism’, in Madsen, R. and Strong, T. B. (eds.), The Many and the One: Religions and Secular Perspectives on Ethical Pluralism in the Modern World, pp. 129–153. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    Ciro, T. 2005. ‘The Scarcity of Intellectual Property’, Journal of Information, Law and Technology, www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/elj/jilt/
    Clark, J. 2006. ‘To Hell with WCAG2’, Accessibility 217, 23 May 2006. http://alistapart.com/articles/tohellwithwcag2
    Clarke, S. 2001. ‘Informed Consent in Medicine in Comparison with Consent in Other Areas of Human Activity’, Southern Journal of Philosophy 39, 169–187.
    Clarke, S. 2005. ‘Future Technologies, Dystopic Futures and the Precautionary Principle”, Ethics and Information Technology 7, 121–126.
    Clarke, S. 2009. ‘New Technologies, Common Sense and the Paradoxical Precautionary Principle’, in Duwell, M. and Sollie, P. (eds.), Evaluating New Technologies: Methodological Problems for the Assessment of Technological Developments, pp. 159–173. Dordrecht: Springer.
    Clarke, S. G. and Simpson, E. 1989. Anti-Theory in Ethics and Moral Conservatism. Albany, NY: State University of NewYork Press.
    Clouser, K. D. 1980. Teaching Bioethics: Strategies, Problems, and Resources. Hastings Center, Institute for Society, Ethics, and the Life Sciences.
    Cockburn, C. and Ormrod, S. 1993. Gender and Technology in the Making. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Coeckelbergh, M. 2007. ‘Violent Computer Games, Empathy, and Cosmopolitanism’, Ethics and Information Technology 9(3), 219–231.
    Coleman, S. and Gøtze, J. 2001/2004. ‘Bowling Together: Online Public Engagement in Policy Deliberation, Hansard Society’. Online at bowlingtogether.net
    Collins, H. M. 1990. Artificial Experts: Social Knowledge and Intelligent Machines. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press.
    Collste, G. 2002. ‘The Internet Doctor and Medical Ethics’, Medicine, Healthcare and Philosophy 5(2), 121–125.
    Combes, R. 2005. ‘A Taxonomy of Technics’, International Philosophical Quarterly 46, 5–24.
    Couldry, N. 2003. ‘Digital Divide or Discursive Design? On the Emerging Ethics of Information Space’, Ethics and Information Technology 5(2), 89–97.
    Cowan, R. S. 1989. More Work for Mother: The Ironies of Household Technology from the Open Hearth to the Microwave. London: Free Association Books.
    Critcher, C. 2006. Critical Readings: Moral Panics and the Media. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
    Cushman, M. and Klecun, E. 2006. ‘How (Can) Nonusers Engage with Technology: Bringing in the Digitally Excluded’, in Trauth, E. M., Howcroft, D., Butler, T., Fitzgerald, B. and DeGross, J. I., Social Inclusion: Societal and Organizational Implications for Information Systems (IFIP Volume 208), pp. 347–364. New York: Springer.
    Dastani, M., Boer, F., Dignum, F., Hoek, W., Kroese, M. and Meyer, J. J., ‘Implementing Cognitive Agents in 3APL’, www.cs.uu.nl/3apl/
    Davies, S. 2003. ‘New Techniques and Technologies of Surveillance in the Workplace’, www.amicus-itpa.org//juneconf3.shtml
    Davis, R. 2001. ‘The Digital Dilemma’, Communications of the ACM 44(2), 77–83.
    George, R. T. 1998. ‘Computers, Ethics, and Business’, Philosophic Exchange 1997–1998, 45–55.
    Landa, M. 1991. War in the Age of Intelligent Machines. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Dennett, D. C. 1987. The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Dennett, D. C. 1996. ‘When Hal Kills, Who's to Blame?’, in Stork, D. (ed.), Hal's Legacy, pp. 351–365. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Dennis, L. 1997. ‘Kant's Ethics and Duties to Oneself’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78(4), 321–348.
    Devon, R. 2004. ‘Towards a Social Ethics of Technology: A Research Prospect’, Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 8(1), 99–115.
    Dewan, S. and Riggins, F. J. 2005. ‘The Digital Divide: Current and Future Research Directions’, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 6(12), 298–337.
    Dewey, J. 1927. The Public and its Problems. New York: Henry Holt & Co.
    Dobransky, K. and Hargittai, E. 2006. ‘The Disability Divide in Internet Access and Use’, Information, Communication and Society 9(3), 313–334.
    Donaldson, T. and Dunfee, T. W. 1999. Ties that Bind: A Social Contracts Approach to Business Ethics. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    Drexler, E. K. 1986. Engines of Creation. Garden City: Doubleday.
    Dreyfus, H. L. 2001. On the Internet. London: Routledge.
    Dryzek, J. 2001. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Dunnigan, J. 1996. Digital Soldiers. New York: St. Martin's Press.
    Dusek, V. 2006. Philosophy of Technology: An Introduction. Malden: Blackwell.
    Dyson, L., Hendriks, M. and Grant, S. (eds.). 2007. Information Technology and Indigenous People. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
    Eickelman, D. F. 2003. ‘Islam and Ethical Pluralism’, in Madsen, R. and Strong, T. B. (eds.), The Many and the One: Religious and Secular Perspectives on Ethical Pluralism in the Modern World, pp. 161–180. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    Einstein, A. 1954. Ideas and Opinions. New York: Crown Publishers.
    Elberfeld, R. 2002. ‘Resonanz als Grundmotiv ostasiatischer Ethik’ [Resonance as a Fundamental Motif of East Asian Ethics], in Elberfeld, R. and Wohlfart, G. (eds.), Kamparative Ethik: Das gute Leben Zwischen den Kulturen [Comparative Ethics: The Good Life between Cultures], pp. 131–141. Cologne: Edition Chora.
    ,Electronic Frontier Foundation. www.EFF.org
    Elgesem, D. 2005. ‘Deliberative Technology?’ in Thorseth, M. and Ess, C. (eds.), Technology in a Multicultural and Global Society, pp. 61–77. Trondheim: NTNU, Programme for Applied Ethics, publ. series no. 6.
    Ellul, J. 1964. The Technological Society (trans. Wilkinson, John). New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
    Ess, C. 1996. ‘The Political Computer: Democracy, CMC, and Habermas’ in , Ess, C. (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives on Computer-Mediated Communication, pp. 197–230. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
    Ess, C. 2002. ‘Computer-Mediated Colonization, the Renaissance, and Educational Imperatives for an Intercultural Global Village’, Ethics and Information Technology 4(1), 11–22.
    Ess, C. 2006a. ‘Ethical Pluralism and Global Information Ethics’, Ethics and Information Technology 8(4), 215–226.
    Ess, C. 2006b. ‘From Computer-Mediated Colonization to Culturally-Aware ICT Usage and Design’, in Zaphiris, P. and Kurniawan, S. (eds.), Advances in Universal Web Design and Evaluation: Research, Trends and Opportunities, pp. 178–197. Hershey, PA: Idea Publishing.
    Ess, C. 2007. ‘Cybernetic Pluralism in an Emerging Global Information and Computing Ethics’, International Review of Information Ethics 7 www.i-r-i-e.net/inhalt/007/11-ess.pdf
    Ess, C. 2009. Digital Media Ethics. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
    Ess, C. and Thorseth, M. 2006. ‘Neither Relativism nor Imperialism: Theories and Practices for a Global Information Ethics’, Ethics and Information Technology 8(3), 91–154.
    ,ETC Group. 2005. ‘A Tiny Primer on Nano-Scale Technologies and “the Little Bang Theory”’, www.etcgroup.org/documents/TinyPrimer_English.pdf
    ,European Commission Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks. 2006. ‘The Appropriateness of Existing Methodologies to Assess the Potential Risks Associated with Engineered and Adventitious Products of Nanotechnologies’, http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_scenihr/docs/scenihr_o_003b.pdf
    ,European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies. 2005. ‘Ethical Aspects of ICT Implants in the Human Body’, http://ec.europa.eu/european_group_ethics/docs/avis20_en.pdf
    Fairweather, N. B. and Rogerson, S. 2001. ‘A Moral Approach to Electronic Patient Records’, Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine 26(3), 219–234.
    Fallows, J. 2008. ‘The Connection Has Been Reset,’ The Atlantic, www.theatlantic.com/doc/200803/chinese-firewall
    Farmer, J. D. and Belin, A. d'A. 1992. ‘Artificial Life: The Coming Evolution”, in Langton, C. G., Taylor, C. E, Farmer, J. D. and Rasmussen, S. (eds.) Artificial Life II: Proceedings of the Workshop on Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems, Santa Fe, 1990. Redwood City, CA: Addison Wesley.
    Farrell, G., Isaacs, S. and Trucano, M. 2007. ‘The NEPAD e-Schools Demonstration Project: A Work in Progress. Washington, DC: infoDTheWorld Bank’, www.infodev.org/en/Publication.355.html
    Ferré, Frederick. 1995. Philosophy of Technology. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
    ,Final Declaration of the First European ‘Seas at Risk’ Conference. 1994. www.seas-at-risk.org/n2_archive.php?page=9
    Fish, S. 1994. There's No Such Thing as Free Speech…and it's a Good Thing too. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Fisher, E., Jones, J. S. and Schomberg, R. 2006. Implementing the Precautionary Principle: Perspectives and Prospects. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
    Fishkin, J. 1997. Voice of the People. Yale University Press.
    Flanagan, M., Howe, D. and Nissenbaum, H. 2005. ‘Values at Play: Design Tradeoffs in Socially-Oriented Game Design’, in Proceedings of the CHI 2005 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI 2005, 2–7 April, Portland, Oregon. New York: ACM Press.
    Flanagan, M., Howe, D. and Nissenbaum, H. 2008. ‘Embodying Values in Technology: Theory and Practice’, in Hoven, J. and Weckert, J. (eds.), Information Technology and Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Fleischmann, K. R. 2007. ‘Digital Libraries with Embedded Values: Combining Insights from LIS and Science and Technology Studies’, Library Quarterly 77(4), 409–427.
    Floridi, L. 1995. ‘Internet: Which Future for Organized Knowledge, Frankenstein or Pygmalion?’, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 43, 261–274.
    Floridi, L. 1999a. Philosophy and Computing: An Introduction. London: Routledge.
    Floridi, L. 1999b. ‘Information Ethics: On the Philosophical Foundations of Computer Ethics’, Ethics and Information Technology 1(1), 37–56.
    Floridi, L. 2002a. ‘Information Ethics: An Environmental Approach to the Digital Divide’, Philosophy in the Contemporary World 9(1), 39–45.
    Floridi, L. 2002b. ‘What Is the Philosophy of Information?’, in Moor, J. H. and Bynum, T. W. (eds.), Cyberphilosophy: The Intersection of Computing and Philosophy, pp. 117–138. Oxford: Blackwell.
    Floridi, L. 2003. ‘On the Intrinsic Value of Information Objects and the Infosphere’, Ethics and Information Technology 4(4), 287–304.
    Floridi, L. 2004. ‘Open Problems in the Philosophy of Information’, Metaphilosophy 35(4), 554–582.
    Floridi, L. 2005a. ‘An Interpretation of Informational Privacy and of Its Moral Value’, Proceedings of CEPE 2005 – 6th Computer Ethics: Philosophical Enquiries Conference, Ethics of New Information Technologies, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
    Floridi, L. 2005b. ‘Information Ethics: Its Nature and Scope’, Computers and Society 36(3), 21–36.
    Floridi, L. 2005c. ‘Presence: From Epistemic Failure to Successful Observability’, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 14(6), 656–667.
    Floridi, L. 2005d. ‘The Ontological Interpretation of Informational Privacy,’ Ethics and Information Technology 7(4), 185–200.
    Floridi, L. 2006a. ‘Four Challenges for a Theory of Informational Privacy’, Ethics and Information Technology 8(3), 109–119.
    Floridi, L. 2006b. ‘Information Technologies and the Tragedy of the Good Will’, Ethics and Information Technology 8(4), 253–262.
    Floridi, L. 2006c. ‘Informational Privacy and its Ontological Interpretation’, Computers and Society 36(3), 37–40.
    Floridi, L. 2007a. ‘A Look into the Future Impact of ICT on Our Lives’, The Information Society 23(1), 59–64.
    Floridi, L., 2007b. ‘Understanding Information Ethics’, APA Newsletter on Philosophy and Computers 7(1), http://76.12.57.18/publications/newsletters/v07n1_Computers_04.aspx
    Floridi, L. 2008a. ‘Artificial Intelligence's New Frontier: Artificial Companions and the Fourth Revolution’, Metaphilosophy 39 (4/5), 651–655.
    Floridi, L. 2008b. ‘The Method of Levels of Abstraction’, Minds and Machines, 18(3), 303–329.
    Floridi, L. 2008c. ‘Replies to “Commentaries on Floridi”’, APA Newsletter on Philosophy and Computers, 72.
    Floridi, L. 2008d. ‘Information Ethics, its Nature and Scope’, in Hoven, J. and Weckert, J. (eds.), Information Technology and Moral Philosophy, pp. 40–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Floridi, L. 2008e. ‘Foundations of Information Ethics’ in Himma, K. E. and Tavani, H. T. (eds.), The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics, pp. 3–23. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
    Floridi, L. 2008f. ‘A Defence of Informational Structural Realism’, Synthese 161(2), 219–253.
    Floridi, L. (forthcoming, a). ‘The Information Society and Its Philosophy’, The Information Society.
    Floridi, L. (forthcoming, b). Response to S. Hongladarom in special issue of Floridi and his Critics
    Floridi, L. (forthcoming, c). The Philosophy of Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Floridi, L., and Sanders, J. W. 1999. ‘Entropy as Evil in Information Ethics’, Etica & Politica, special issue on Computer Ethics 1(2).
    Floridi, L. and Sanders, J. W. 2001. ‘Artificial Evil and the Foundation of Computer Ethics’, Ethics and Information Technology 3, 55–66.
    Floridi, L. and Sanders, J. W. 2002. ‘Mapping the Foundationalist Debate in Computer Ethics,’ Ethics and Information Technology 4(1), 1–9. A revised version is printed in Spinello, R. A. and Tavani, H. T. (eds.), Readings in Cyberethics (2nd edn), pp. 84–95. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
    Floridi, L. and Sanders, J. W. 2004. ‘On the Morality of Artificial Agents’. Minds and Machines 14(3), 349–379.
    Floridi, L. and Sanders, J. W. 2005. ‘Internet Ethics: The Constructionist Values of Homo Poieticus’, in Cavalier, R. (ed.), The Impact of the Internet on Our Moral Lives, pp. 195–214. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
    Foot, P. 1967. ‘The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect’, Oxford Review 5, 5–15.
    Foster, K. R. and Jaeger, J. (forthcoming). ‘Ethical Implications of Implantable Radiofrequency Identification Tags in Humans’, American Journal of Bioethics.
    Frankena, W. 1973. Ethics (2nd edn). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.
    Freud, S. 1917. ‘A Difficulty in the Path of Psycho-Analysis’, The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, XVII(1917–1919), pp. 135–144.
    Friedman, B. (ed.) 1997. Human Values and the Design of Computer Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Friedman, B. and Freier, N. 2005. ‘Value Sensitive Design’, in Fisher, E., Erdelez, S. and McKechnie, E. (eds.), Theories of Information Behavior: A Researcher's Guide. Medford, NJ: Information Today.
    Friedman, B., Howe, D. and Felten, E. 2002. ‘Informed Consent in the Mozilla Browser: Implementing Value-Sensitive Design’, in Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth Annual Hawai'i International Conference on System Sciences. Abstract, p. 247; CD-ROM of full-paper, OSPE101. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
    Friedman, B. and Kahn, P. 2003. ‘Human Values, Ethics, and Design’, in Jacko, J. and Sears, A. (eds.), The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H. and Borning, A. 2006. ‘Value Sensitive Design and Information Systems’ in Zhang, P. and Galletta, D. (eds.), Human-Computer Interaction in Management Information Systems. Foundations, New York: M. E. Sharpe.
    Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H.. and Borning, A. 2008. ‘Value Sensitive Design and Information System’, in Himma, K. E. and Tavani, H. T. (eds.), The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics, pp. 69–102. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
    Friedman, B., Lin, P. and Miller, J. K. 2005. ‘Informed Consent by Design’, in Cranor, L. F. and Garfinkel, S. (eds.), Designing Secure Systems that People Can Use. O'Reilly.
    Friedman, B. and Nissenbaum, H. 1996. ‘Bias in Computer Systems’, ACM Transactions on Computer Systems 14(3), 330–347.
    Friedman, T. 2005. ‘It's a Flat World, After All’, New York Times, 3 April. www.nytimes.com/2005/04/03/magazine/03DOMINANCE.html
    Froomkin, A. Michael. 2001. ‘The Collision of Trademarks, Domain Names, and Due Process in Cyberspace’, Communications of the ACM 44(2), 91–97.
    Fukuyama, F. 2002. Our Posthuman Future. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
    Fulcher, G. 1989. Disabling Policies? London: Falmer Press.
    Gall, C. and Waal, T. 1998. Chechnya: Calamity in the Caucasus. New York: New York University Press.
    Gallie, W. B. 1956. ‘Essentially Contested Concepts’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56, 167–198.
    Galston, W. A. 2002. Liberal Pluralism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Gardiner, S. M. 2006. ‘A Core Precautionary Principle’, Journal of Political Philosophy 14(1), 33–60.
    Gemmey, J., Bell, G., Lueder, R., Drucker, S. and Wong, C. 2002 ‘MyLifeBits: Fulfilling the Memex Vision’, ACM Multimedia '02, 1–6 December 2002, Juan-les-Pins, France, pp. 235–238. Retrieved January 2008 from http://research.microsoft.com/apps/pubs/default.aspx?id=64165
    George, Carlisle E. 2006. ‘Copyright Management Systems: Accessing the Power Balance’, in Zielinski, C., Duquenoy, P. and Kimppa, K. (eds.), The Information Society: Emerging Landscapes (IFIP WG 9.2 Proceedings), pp. 211–222. New York: Springer.
    Gert, B. 1998. Morality: Its Nature and Justification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Gert, Bernard. 1999. ‘Common Morality and Computing’, Ethics and Information Technology 1(1), 57–64.
    Ghemawat, P. 2007. ‘Why the World Isn't Flat’, Foreign Policy 159 (March/April), 54–60.
    ,Global Forum for Health Research. ‘The 10/90 Gap’, www.globalforumhealth.org/
    Goggin, G. and Newell, C. 2000. ‘An End to Disabling Policies? Toward Enlightened Universal Service’, The Information Society 16, 127–133.
    Goggin, G. and Newell, C. 2006. ‘Disability, Identity, and Interdependence: ICTs and New Social Forms’, Information, Communication and Society 9(3), 309–311.
    Goode, R. 2004. Commercial Law (3rd edn). London: Penguin Books.
    Goodstein, A. 2007. Totally Wired: What Teens and Tweens are Really Doing Online. St Martin's: Griffin.
    Goodwin, I. 2004. ‘Book Reviews: The Virtual Community’, Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture 1(1), 103–109.
    Górniak-Kocikowska, K. 1996. ‘The Computer Revolution and the Problem of Global Ethics’, Global Information Ethics (a special issue of Science and Engineering Ethics) 2(2), 177–190.
    Gotterbarn, D. 1995. ‘Computer Ethics: Responsibility Regained’, in Johnson, D. G. and Nissenbaum, H. (eds.), Computers, Ethics and Social Values, pp. 18–24. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Gowans, C. W. 1987. Moral Dilemmas. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Greco, G. M. and Floridi, L. 2004. ‘The Tragedy of the Digital Commons’, Ethics and Information Technology 6(2), 73–82.
    Greenhill, A. and Wilson, M. 2006. ‘Haven or Hell? Telework, Flexibility and Family in the E-Society: A Marxist Analysis’, European Journal of Information Systems 15(3), 379–388.
    Grier, D. A. 2005. When Computers Were Human. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    Griffin, J. 1993. “How We Do Ethics Now', in Phillips Griffiths, A. (ed.), Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Griffin, J. 1996. Value Judgement: Improving Our Ethical Beliefs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Griffiths, M. and Light, B. 2008. ‘Social Networking and Digital Gaming Media Convergence: Consequences for Appropriation in Habbo Hotel’, Under the Mask: Perspectives on the Gamer Conference, the Research Institute for Media, Art and Design, University of Bedfordshire.
    Grodzinsky, F. S., Miller, K. W. and Wolf, M. J. 2008. ‘The Ethics of Designing Artificial Agents’, Ethics and Information Technology 10, 115–121.
    Grundy, F. 1996. Women and Computing. Exeter: Intellect.
    Gutman, A. and Thompson, D. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
    Habermas, J. 1983. Moralbewußtsein und Kommunikatives Handelns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
    Habermas, J. 1990. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Habermas, J. 1993. ‘Remarks on Discourse Ethics’, in Justification and Application, pp. 19–113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Hacker, K. and Mason, S. M. 2003. ‘Ethical Gaps in Studies of the Digital Divide’, Ethics and Information Technology 5(2), 99–115.
    Haga, S. B. and Willard, H. F. 2006. ‘Defining the Spectrum of Genome Policy’, Nature Reviews Genetics 7(12), 966–972.
    Haldane, J. H. 2003. ‘Natural Law and Ethical Pluralism’, in Madsen, R. and Strong, T. B. (eds.), The Many and the One: Religious and Secular Perspectives on Ethical Pluralism in the Modern World, pp. 89–114. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    Hallion, R. 1992. Storm Over Iraq. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
    Hamilton, E. and Cairns, H. (eds.). 1989. Plato, The Collected Dialogues. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    Hanson, R. 1994. ‘If Uploads Come First’, Extropy 6(2). http://hanson.gmu.edu/uploads.html
    Hare, R. M. 1984. ‘Supervenience’. Paper read at Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 56.
    Harvey, L. 1990. Critical Social Research. London: Unwin Hyman.
    Held, D. and McGrew, A. 2001. ‘Globalization’ in Krieger, J. (ed.), Oxford Companion to Politics of the World. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. Also available online at www.polity.co.uk/global/globocp.htm.
    Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D. and Perraton, J. 1999. Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    Henwood, F. 1993. ‘Establishing Gender Perspectives on Information Technology: Problems Issues and Opportunities’, in Green, E., Owen, J. and Pain, D. (eds.), Gendered by Design? Information Technology and Office Systems, pp. 31–49. London: Taylor and Francis.
    Hepburn, R. W. 1984. ‘Wonder’ and Other Essays: Eight Studies in Aesthetics and Neighbouring Fields. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    Herold, K. 2005. ‘A Buddhist Model for the Informational Person’, Proceedings of the Second Asia Pacific Computing and Philosophy Conference, 7–9 January, Bangkok, Thailand.
    Herring, S. 1996. ‘Posting in a Different Voice: Gender and Ethics in CMC’, in Ess, C. (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives on Computer-Mediated Communication, pp. 115–145. Albany NY: State University of New York Press.
    Heymann, P. 2003. Terrorism, Security, and Freedom. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Himanen, P. 2001. The Hacker Ethic and the Spirit of the Information Age. London: Secker & Warburg.
    Himma, K. E. 2003. ‘The Relationship between the Uniqueness of Computer Ethics and Its Independence as a Discipline in Applied Ethics’, Ethics and Information Technology 5(4), 225–237.
    Himma, K. E. 2004. ‘There's Something About Mary: The Moral Value of Things Qua Information Objects’, Ethics and Information Technology 6(3), 145–159.
    Himma, K. E. 2007a. ‘Foundational Issues in Information Ethics’, Library Hi Tech 25(1), 79–94.
    Himma, K. E. 2007b. ‘Artificial Agency, Consciousness, and the Criteria for Moral Agency: What Properties Must an Artificial Agent Have to be a Moral Agent?’, SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=983503
    Himma, K. E. and Tavani, H. T. (eds.) 2008. The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
    Hinman, L. 2002. ‘The Impact of the Internet on Our Moral Lives in Academia’, Ethics and Information Technology 4(1), 31–35.
    Hinman, L. 2004. ‘Virtual Virtues: Reflections on Academic Integrity in the Age of the Internet’, in Cavalier, R. (ed.), The Internet and Our Moral Lives, pp. 49–68. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
    Hinman, L. 2008. Ethics: A Pluralistic Approach to Moral Theory (4th edn). Belmont, CA: Thomson-Wadsworth.
    Hobsbawm, E. 1969. Bandits. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
    Hodel, T. B., Holderegger, A. and Lüthi, A. 1998. ‘Ethical Guidelines for a Networked World under Construction’, Journal of Business Ethics 17(9–10), 1057–1071.
    Holland, J. H. 1975. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
    Hollis, D. 2007. ‘Rules of Cyberwar?’, The Los Angeles Times, 8 October.
    Hongladarom, S. 2004. ‘Making Information Transparent as a Means to Close the Global Digital Divide’, Minds and Machines 14(1), 85–99.
    Hongladarom, S. 2007. ‘Analysis and Justification of Privacy from a Buddhist Perspective’, in Hongladarom, S. and Ess, C. (eds.), Information Technology Ethics: Cultural Perspectives, pp. 108–122. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
    Hongladarom, S. 2008. ‘Floridi and Spinoza on Global Information Ethics’, Ethics and Information Technology 10(2–3), 175–187.
    Hoque, K. and Noon, M. 2004. ‘Equal Opportunities Policy and Practice in Britain: Evaluating the “empty shell” hypothesis’, Work, Employment and Society 18(3), 418–505.
    Howard, M., Andreopoulos, G. and Shulman, M. 1994. The Laws of War. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    Huizinga, J. 1998. Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture. Abingdon: Routledge. First published in 1938 with the title Homo Ludens : Proeve Eener Bepaling Van Het Spel-Element Der Cultuur. Haarlem: H. D. Tjeenk Willink.
    Huxley, A. 2006. Brave New World. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics.
    Ihde, D. 1990, Technology and the Lifeworld. Bloomington/Minneapolis: Indiana University Press.
    Ihde, D. 1998. Expanding Hermeneutics. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
    ,Independent Expert Group on Mobile Phones. 2000. ‘Mobile phones and health’, www.iegmp.org.uk/
    Inness, J. C. 1992. Privacy, Intimacy, and Isolation. New York: Oxford University Press.
    ,International Herald Tribune, Europe. 2008. ‘Heathrow Begins Requiring Iris scans, Fingerprints from Some Passengers’, the Associated Press. 1 February. www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/02/01/europe/EU-GEN-Britain-Heathrow-Biometric-Data.php
    ,Internet World Stats: Usage and Population Statistics. 2008. World Internet Users: March 2008. www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm
    Introna, L. 2005. ‘Disclosive Ethics and Information Technology: Disclosing Facial Recognition Systems’, Ethics and Information Technology 7(2), 75–86.
    Introna, L. 2007. ‘Maintaining the Reversibility of Foldings: Making the Ethics (Politics) of Information Technology Visible’, Ethics and Information Technology 9(1), 11–25.
    Introna, L. 2008. ‘Phenomenological Approaches to Ethics and Information Technology’, in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 edition).
    Introna, L. and Nissenbaum, H. 2000. ‘Shaping the Web: Why the Politics of Search Engines Matters’, The Information Society 16(3), 1–17.
    Jackson, P., Gharavi, H. and Klobas, J. 2006. ‘Technologies of the Self: Virtual Work and the Inner Panopticon’, Information Technology and People 19(3), 219–243.
    Jerrard, A. A. and Chang, T. Y. 2003. ‘A Case Study of How Technology and Trust Enable the Projectized Team-Based Organization’, in Joia, Luiz Antonio (ed.), IT-Based Management: Challenges and Solutions, pp. 111–129. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
    Johnson, D. G. 1985. Computer Ethics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. (2nd edn, 1994; 3rd edn, 2001.)
    Johnson, D. G. 1997. ‘Is the Global Information Infrastructure a Democratic Technology?’, Computers and Society 27, 20–26.
    Johnson, D. G. 2000. ‘Should Computer Programs be Owned?’, in Baird, R. M., Ramsower, R. and Rosenbaum, S. E. (eds.), Cyberethics – Social and Moral Issues in the Computer Age, pp. 222–235. New York: Prometheus Books.
    Johnson, D. G. 2006. ‘Computer Systems: Moral Entities but Not Moral Agents’, Ethics and Information Technology 8(4), 195–204.
    Johnson, D. G. and Miller, K. W. 2008. ‘Un-making Artificial Moral Agents’, Ethics and Information Technology 10, 123–133.
    Johnstone, J. 2007. ‘Technology as Empowerment: A Capability Approach to Computer Ethics’, Ethics and Information Technology 9(1), 73–87.
    Jonas, H. 1984. The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    Jones, R. A. L. 2007. ‘Debating Nanotechnologies’, in Allhof, F., Lin, P., Moor, J. and Weckert, J. (eds.) Nanoethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Nanotechnology, pp. 71–79. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Interscience.
    Jordan, T. and Taylor, P. A. 2004. Hacktivism and Cyberwars: Rebels With a Cause? London and New York: Routledge.
    Kant, Immanuel 1952. The Critique of Judgment. Trans. Meredith, J. M.. Oxford: Clarendon.
    Kass, L. 2003. ‘Ageless Bodies, Happy Souls: Biotechnology and the Pursuit of Perfection’, The New Atlantis, Spring, 9–28.
    Kim, T. K. 2005. ,‘Electronic Storm: Stormfront Grows a Thriving Neo-Nazi Community’, Intelligence Report, Southern Poverty Law Center, Summer 2005. www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=551
    Klein, N. 2000. No Logo: No Space, No Choice, No Jobs. London: Flamingo.
    Klein, Naomi. 2008. ‘China's All-Seeing Eye’, Rolling Stone Magazine (29 May). www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/20797485/chinas_allseeing_eye
    Kleinig, J. 1982. ‘The Ethics of Consent’, in Neilsen, K. and Patten, S. C. (eds.), New Essays in Ethics and Public Policy. Guelph, Ontario: Canadian Association for Publishing in Philosophy.
    Korsgaard, C. M. 2003. ‘The Dependence of Value on Humanity’, in Raz, J., The Practice of Value, pp. 63–86. (ed.) J. Wallace, R.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    Kreps, D. and Adam, A. 2006. ‘Failing the Disabled Community?: The Continuing Problem of Web Accessibility’, in Zaphiris, P. and Kurniawan, S. (eds.), Human Computer Interaction Research in Web Design and Evaluation. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
    Kroes, P. (forthcoming). The Moral Significance of Technical Artefacts.
    Kroes, P. and Meijers, A. 2006. ‘The Dual Nature of Technical Artefacts’, Studies in History and Philosophy 37, 1–4.
    Ladd, J. 2000. ‘Ethics and the Computer World – A New Challenge for Philosophers’, in Baird, R. M., Ramsower, R. and Rosenbaum, S. E. (eds.), Cyberethics – Social and Moral Issues in the Computer Age, pp. 44–55. New York: Prometheus Books.
    Latour, B. 1992, ‘Where are the Missing Masses? – The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artefacts’, in Bijker, W. E. and Law, J. (eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society, pp. 225–258. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Latour, B. 2002. ‘Morality and Technology: The End of the Means’, Theory, Culture and Society 19(5–6), 247–260.
    Laurent, L. and Petit, J. C. 2005. ‘Nanoscience and Its Convergence with Other Technologies’, Hyle 11(1), 45–76.
    Law, J. and Hassard, J. 1999. Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford and Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    Lebedev, M. A. and Nicolelis, M. A. L. 2006. ‘Brain Machine Interfaces: Past, Present, and Future’, Trends in Neurosciences 29(9), 536–546.
    Leone, R. and Anrig, G. 2004. The War on Our Freedoms: Civil Liberties in an Age of Terrorism. New York: Public Affairs Press.
    Leopold, A. 1949. The Sand County Almanac. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Lessig, L. 1999. Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.
    Lessig, L. 2006. Code: Version 2.0. New York: Basic Books.
    Lewis, S. 2004. ‘How Much is Stronger DRM Worth?’, in Camp, L. J. and Lewis, S. (eds.), Economics of Information Security, pp. 53–57. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
    Libicki, M. 2007. Conquest in Cyberspace: National Security and Information Warfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Lieven, A. 1998. Chechnya: Tombstone of Russian Power. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    Liu, Z. and Sarkar, S. 2007. ‘Outdoor Recognition at a Distance by Fusing Gait and Face’, Image and Vision Computing 25(6), 817–832.
    Lloyd, S. 2006. Programming the Universe. New York: Knopf.
    Lohn, J. D. and Hornsby, G. S. 2006. ‘Evolvable Hardware: Using Evolutionary Computation to Design and Optimize Hardware Systems’, IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine 1, 19–27.
    Lü, Y. 2005. ‘Privacy and Data Privacy Issues in Contemporary China’, Ethics and Information Technology 7(1), 7–15.
    Ludlow, P. 1996. High Noon on the Electronic Frontier: Conceptual Issues in Cyberspace. Boston: MIT Press.
    Ludlow, P. and Wallace, M. 2007. The Second Life Herald: The Virtual Tabloid that Witnessed the Dawn of the Metaverse. Boston: MIT Press.
    Lyman, P. and Varian, H. R. 2003. ‘How Much Information?’, www.sims.berkeley.edu/research/projects/how-much-info-2003/execsum.htm#summary
    Lyon, D. 1994. The Electronic Eye: The Rise of Surveillance Society. Cambridge: Polity Press
    MacKinnon, R. 2008. ‘Asia's Fight for Web Rights’, Far Eastern Economic Review, April. www.feer.com/essays/2008/april/asias-fight-for-web-rights
    Maner, W. 1980. Starter Kit in Computer Ethics. Hyde Park, NY: Helvetia Press and the National Information and Resource Center for Teaching Philosophy. (Originally self-published in 1978.)
    Maner, W. 1996, ‘Unique Ethical Problems in Information Technology’, Global Information Ethics (a special issue of Science and Engineering Ethics) 2(2), 137–154.
    Maner, W. 2004. ‘Unique Ethical Problems in Information Technology’, in Bynum, T. W. and Rogerson, S. (eds.), Computer Ethics and Professional Responsibilty, pp. 39–59. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    Mann, S. 1997. ‘Wearable Computing: A First Step Toward Personal Imaging’, Computer 30(2), 25–31.
    Mann, S. 2001. ‘Wearable Computing: Toward Humanistic Intelligence’, IEEE Intelligent Systems 16(3), 10–15.
    Manson, N. A. 2002. ‘Formulating the Precautionary Principle’, Environmental Ethics 24, 263–274.
    Manson, N. C. and O'Neill, O. 2007. ‘Rethinking Informed Consent’, in Bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Marber, P. 2005. ‘Globalization and Its Contents’, World Policy Journal, Winter 2004/2005, 29–37.
    Markoff, J. 2005. What the Dormouse Said: How the 60s Counterculture Shaped the Personal Computer. New York: Viking Adult.
    Marquie, J. C., Jourdan-Boddaert, L. and Huet, N. 2002. ‘Do Older Adults Underestimate Their Actual Computer Knowledge?’, Behaviour and Information Technology 24(4), 273–280.
    Mason, R. O. 2000. ‘Intellectual Property and Open Systems’, in Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
    Mather, K. 2005. ‘Object Oriented Goodness: A Response to Mathiesen's “What Is Information Ethics?”’, Computers and Society 34(4).
    Mathiesen, K. 2004. ‘What Is Information Ethics?’, Computers and Society, 32(8), www.computersandsociety.org/sigcas_ofthefuture2/sigcas/subpage/sub_page.cfm?article=909&page_number_nb=901
    McCalman, J. 2003. ‘What Can We Do for Corporate Nomads? IT and Facilities Management’, in Joia, Luiz Antonio (ed.), IT-Based Management: Challenges and Solutions, pp. 130–142. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
    McCormick, M. 2001. ‘Is It Wrong to Play Violent Video Games?’ Ethics and Information Technology 3(4), 277–287.
    McFarland, M. C. 2001. ‘Intellectual Property, Information, and the Common Good’, in Spinello, R. A. and Tavani, H. T. (eds.) Readings in Cyberethics, pp. 252–262. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
    McKenzie, D. and Wajcman, J. (eds.) 1999. The Social Shaping of Technology. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
    McLaughlin, B. and Bennet, K. 2005. ‘Supervenience’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/supervenience/
    McSorley, K. 2003. ‘The Secular Salvation Story of the Digital Divide’, Ethics and Information Technology 5(2), 75–87.
    Mellor, C. 2004. ‘Google's Storage Strategy’, TechWorld (6 April).
    Michelfelder, D. 2001. ‘The Moral Value of Informational Privacy in Cyberspace’, Ethics and Information Technology 3(2), 129–135.
    ,Microsoft-Research 2005. ‘The Towards 2020 Science’.
    Midgley, Mary. 1996. ‘Trying Out One's New Sword’, in Arthur, J. (ed.), Morality and Moral Controversies (4th edn), pp. 116–119. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Simon and Schuster.
    Midgley, M. 1985. ‘Persons and Non-Persons’, in Singer, P. (ed.), Defence of Animals, pp. 52–62. Oxford: BasilBlackwell.
    Mill, J. S. 2007. On Liberty and The Subjection of Women. New York: Penguin Classics.
    Miller, S. and Weckert, J. 2000. ‘Privacy, the Workplace and the Internet’, Journal of Business Ethics 28, 255–265.
    Moor, J. H. 1985. ‘What is Computer Ethics’, Metaphilosophy 16(4), 266–275.
    Moor, J. H. 1998. ‘Reason, Relativity and Responsibility in Computer Ethics’, Computers and Society 28(1), 14–21.
    Moor, J. H. 1999. ‘Just Consequentialism and Computing’, Ethics and Information Technology 1(1), 65–69.
    Moor, J. H. 2001. ‘Just Consequentialism and Computing’, in Spinello, R. A. and Tavani, H. T (eds.), Readings in Cyberethics, pp. 98–105. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
    Moor, J. H. 2006. ‘The Nature, Importance, and Difficulty of Machine Ethics’, IEEE Intelligent Systems 21, 18–21.
    Moore, G. 1965. ‘Cramming More Components onto Integrated Circuits’, Electronics 38, 114–117.
    Moores, T. T. and Chang, J. 2006. ‘Ethical Decision Making in Software Privacy: Initial Development and Test of a Four-Component Model’, MIS Quarterly 30(1), 167–180.
    Morgan, R. 2008. ‘,Juicy Campus: College Gossip Leaves the Bathroom Wall and Goes Online’, International Herald Tribune, 18 March. www.iht.com/articles/2008/03/18/arts/gossip.php
    Moser, I. 2006. ‘Disability and the Promises of Technology: Technology, Subjectivity and Embodiment within an Order of the Normal’, Information, Communication and Society 9(3), 373–395.
    Moss, J. 2002. ‘Power and the Digital Divide’, Ethics and Information Technology 4(2), 159–165.
    Naess, A. 1973. ‘The Shallow and the Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movement’, Inquiry 16, 95–100.
    Nagel, T. 1986. The View from Nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Nagel, T. 1987. ‘The Fragmentation of Value’, in Gowans, C. W. Moral Dilemmas, pp. 174–187. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Nakada, M. and Tamura, T. 2005. ‘Japanese Conceptions of Privacy: An Intercultural Perspective’, Ethics and Information Technology 7(1), 27–36.
    Nash, R. F. 1989. The Rights of Nature. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.
    ,National Institute of Health. ‘Nuremburg Code’http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/index.html.]
    ,Nature. 2006, ‘2020 – Future of Computing’, 440.
    Nietzsche, F. W. 2003. Beyond Good and Evil: Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future. Horstmann, R.-P. (ed.); Judith Norman (trans). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Nissenbaum, H. 1998. ‘Values in the Design of Computer Systems’, Computers and Society, March 1998, 38–39.
    Nissenbaum, H. 2001. ‘How Computer Systems Embody Values’, IEEE Computer 34, March, 118–120.
    Nissenbaum, H. 2004. ‘Privacy as Contextual Integrity’, Washington Law Review 79, 119–158.
    Nozick, R. 1993. The Nature of Rationality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    ,Nuffield Council on Bioethics. 2003. Pharmacogenetics: Ethical Issues. London: Nuffield Council On Bioethics.
    Ofcom, 2008. ‘The Communications Market 2008’, www.ofcom.org.uk/research/cm/cmr08/
    O'Neill, O. 2004. ‘Modern Moral Philosophy and the Problem of Relevant Descriptions’, in Modern Moral Philosophy, pp. 301–316. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    O'Reilly, T. 2005. ‘What Is Web 2.0 – Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software’, www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html
    Ortega Y Gasset, J. 1961. ‘Man the Technician’, in Weyl, H. (trans.), History as a System: And Other Essays Toward a Philosophy of History, pp. 87–161. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
    Orwell, G. 1949. Nineteen Eighty-Four. London: Secker and Warburg.
    Ossorio, Pilar N. 2006. ‘About Face: Forensic Genetic Testing for Race and Visible Traits’, Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34(2), 277–292.
    Pape, R. 1996. Bombing to Win. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    Parker, D. 1968. ‘Rules of Ethics in Information Processing’, Communications of the ACM 11, 198–201.
    Parker, D. 1979. Ethical Conflicts in Computer Science and Technology. Arlington, VA: AFIPS Press.
    Parker, D.et al. 1990. Ethical Conflicts in Information and Computer Science, Technology and Business. Wellesley, MA: QED Information Sciences.
    Paterson, B. 2007. ‘We Cannot Eat Data: The Need for Computer Ethics to Address the Cultural and Ecological Impacts of Computing’, in Hongladarom, S. and Ess, C. (eds.), Information Technology Ethics: Cultural Perspectives, pp. 153–168. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
    Patton, M. F. J. 1988. ‘Tissues in the Profession: Can Bad Men Make Good Brains Do Bad Things?’, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 61(3).
    PBS Online. 1998. ‘Nerds 2.0.1: Wiring the World’, www.pbs.org/opb/nerds2.0.1/wiring_world/
    Pearson, C. and Watson, N. 2007. ‘Tackling Disability Discrimination in the United Kingdom: The British Disability Discrimination Act’, Journal of Law and Policy 23: 95–120. http://law.wustl.edu/Journal.index.asp?ID=5697
    Pennell, C. 2001. Bandits at Sea: A Pirates Reader. New York: New York University Press.
    Pennings, J. 1998. ‘Innovations as Precursors of Organizational Performance’, in Galliers, R. D. and Baets, W. R. J. (eds.), Information Technology and Organizational Transformation: Innovation for the 21st Century, pp. 153–178. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
    Phillips, A. 1995. The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Phillips, J. and Firth, A. 2001. Introduction to Intellectual Property Law (4th edn). London: Butterworths LexisNexis.
    Plant, S. 1997. Zeros and Ones. London: Fourth Estate.
    ,Plato. 1993. Symposium, Robin Waterfield (ed. and trans.). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
    Pohl, F. 1981. The Cool War. New York: Ballantine Books.
    Posner, R. A. 1997, ‘Problematics of Moral and Legal Theory’, The Harvard Law Review 111, 1637–1637.
    Potter, S. M., Wagenaar, D. A. and DeMarse, T. B. 2006. ‘Closing the Loop: Stimulation Feedback Systems for Embodied MEA Cultures’, in Taketani, M. and Baudry, M. (eds.), Advances in Network Electrophysiology Using Multi-Electrode Arrays, pp. 215–242. New York: Springer.
    Putnam, H. 2004. Ethics Without Ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Putnam, R. 2001. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
    Rattray, G. 2001. Strategic Warfare in Cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Rawls, J. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
    Rawls, J. 1999. A Theory of Justice (rev. edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Rees, T. L. 1998. Mainstreaming Equality in the European Union. London and New York: Routledge.
    Reidenberg, J. R. 2000. ‘Resolving Conflicting International Data Privacy Rules in Cyberspace’, Stanford Law Review 52, 1315–1376.
    Rheingold, H. 2000. The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier (2nd edn). Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
    Rosen, J. 2004. The Naked Crowd: Reclaiming Security and Freedom in an Anxious Age. New York: Random House.
    Ross, D.et al. (eds.) 2000. Dennett's Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    ,Royal Society and the Royal Academy of Engineering. 2004. ‘Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties’, www.nanotec.org.uk/finalReport.htm
    Rucker, R. 2006. The Lifebox, the Seashell, and the Soul: What Gnarly Computation Taught Me About Ultimate Reality, the Meaning of Life, and How to Be Happy. New York: Basic Books.
    Saletan, W. 2005. ‘The Beam in Your Eye: If Steroids are Cheating Why isn't LASIK?’, Slate, 18 April. www.slate.com/id/2116858/
    Samuelson, P. and Scotchmer, S. 2002. ‘The Law and Economics of Reverse Engineering’, The Yale Law Journal 111(7), 1575–1673.
    Sandberg, A. and Bostrom, N. 2007. ‘Cognitive Enhancement: A Review of Technology’, www.enhanceproject.org/documents/Cognitive%20Enhancement%20Tech%20Review.pdf
    Sandel, M. 2007. The Case Against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Sandin, P. 2007. ‘Common Sense Precaution and Varieties of the Precautionary Principle’, in Lewen, T. (ed.), Risk: Philosophical Perspectives, pp. 99–112. London: Routledge.
    Saponas, T. S., Jonathan, L., Carl, H., Sameer, A. and Tadayoshi, K. (eds.) 2007. Special issue on ‘Devices That Tell on You: Privacy Trends in Consumer Ubiquitous Computing’, USENIX Association.
    Schelling, T. 1966. Arms and Influence. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    Schiffman, B. 2008. ‘Turns Out Porn Isn't Recession-Proof’, Wired Blog Network, http://blog.wired.com/business/2008/07/turns-out-por-1.html
    Schneiderman, F. B. (ed.) 1999. Trust in Cyberspace. Washington, DC:National Academic Press.
    Schrödinger, E. 1944. What is Life? The Physical Aspect of the Living Cell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Seife, C. 2006. Decoding the Universe: How the New Science of Information is Explaining Everything in the Cosmos, from Our Brains to Black Holes. New York: Viking, the Penguin Group.
    Servon, L. 2002. Bridging the Digital Divide: Technology, Community, and Public Policy. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    Severson, R. J. 1997. The Principles of Information Ethics. New York: Armonk and London: M. E. Sharpe.
    Shakespeare, T. 2006. Disability Rights and Wrongs. London and New York: Routledge.
    Shapira, N., Barak, A. and Gal, I. 2007. ‘Promoting Older Adults’ Well-being through Internet Training and Use'. Aging and Mental Health, 11(5), 477–484.
    Shrader-Frechette, K. and Westra, L. (eds.) 1997. Technology and Values. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
    Sicart, M. 2005. ‘On the Foundations of Evil in Computer Game Cheating’, Proceedings of the Digital Games Research Association's 2nd International Conference – Changing Views: Worlds in Play, June 16–20, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
    Sicart, M. and Studies, G. 2009. The Ethics of Computer Games. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
    Siponen, M. 2004. ‘A Pragmatic Evaluation of the Theory of Information Ethics’, Ethics and Information Technology 6(4), 279–290.
    Siponen, M. and Vartiainen, T. 2002. ‘Teaching End-User Ethics: Issues and a Solution Based on Universalizability’, Communications of the Association for Information Systems 8, 422–443.
    Small, Luc. 2007. ‘Theft in a Wireless World’, Ethics and Information Technology 9, 179–186.
    Smart, A., Martin, P. and Parker, M. 2004. ‘Tailored Medicine: Whom Will it Fit? The Ethics of Patient and Disease Stratification’, Bioethics 18(4), 322–343.
    Smart, J. J. C. and Williams, B. A. O. 1987. Utilitarianism: For and Against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (First published 1973, reprinted with corrections and supplementary bibliography.)
    Smith, M. M. 1996. ‘Information Ethics: An Hermeneutical Analysis of an Emerging Area in Applied Ethics’, PhD thesis, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, D.C.
    Smith, M. M. 2002, ‘Global Information Ethics: A Mandate for Professional Education’, Proceedings of the 68th IFLA Council and General Conference, Glasgow. Also available online at www.ifla.org/IV/ifla68/papers/056-093e.pdf.
    Som, C., Hilty, L. M. and Ruddy, T. F. 2004. ‘The Precautionary Principle in the Information Society’, Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 10, 787–799.
    Spencer, R. 2008. ‘Footprints Faked, Admit Organizers’, The Age, www.theage.com.au/news/latest-news/footprints-faked-admit-organisers/2008/08/11/1218306780009.html
    Spier, R. M. 2001. Science and Technology Ethics. London: Routledge.
    Spinello, R. A. 2000. Cyberethics: Morality and Law in Cyberspace. London: Jones and Bartlett.
    Spinello, R. A. 2003. ‘The Future of Intellectual Property’, Ethics and Information Technology 5(1), 1–16.
    Spinello, R. A. and Tavani, H. T. 2005. ‘Intellectual Property Rights: From Theory to Practical Implementation’, in Spinello, R. A. and Tavani, H. T. (eds.), Intellectual Property Rights in a Networked World: Theory and Practice, pp. 1–65. Hershey, PA: INFOSCI.
    Stahl, B. C. 2005. ‘The Impact of Open Source Development on the Social Construction of Intellectual Property’, in Koch, S. (ed.) Free/Open Source Software Development, pp. 259–272. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
    Stahl, B. C. 2007. ‘Social Justice and Market Metaphysics: A Critical Discussion of Philosophical Approaches to Digital Divides’, in Rookby, E. and Weckert, J. (eds.) Information Technology and Social Justice, pp. 148–170. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
    Stahl, B. C. 2008a. ‘Empowerment through ICT: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Egyptian ICT Policy’, in Proceedings of the Human Choice and Computers 8 Conference, 25–27 September 2008, Pretoria, South Africa.
    Stahl, B. C. 2008b. Information Systems: Critical Perspectives. London: Routledge.
    Stahl, B. C. 2008c. ‘The Ethical Nature of Critical Research in Information Systems’, Information Systems Journal 18(2), special issue on ‘Exploring the Critical Agenda in IS Research’, Brooke, C., Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. and Klein, H. K. (eds.), 137–163.
    Stallman, R. 1995. ‘Why Software Should Be Free’, in Johnson, D. G. and Nissenbaum, H. (eds.), Computers, Ethics and Social Values, pp. 190–200. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
    Stanton, J. M. and Julian, A. L. 2002, ‘The Impact of Electronic Monitoring on Quality and Quantity of Performance’, Computers in Human Behavior 18(1), 85–101.
    Stienstra, D. 2006. ‘The Critical Space between: Access, Inclusion and Standards in Information Technologies’, Information, Communication and Society 9(6), 335–354.
    Stuart, S. 2008. ‘From Agency to Apperception: Through Kinaesthesia to Cognition and Creation’. (Special issue on Kant and Information Ethics), Ethics and Information Technology.
    Sullins, J. P. 2006a. ‘Ethics and Artificial Life: From Modeling to Moral Agents’. Ethics and Information Technology 7(3), 139–148.
    Sullins, J. P. 2006b. ‘When Is a Robot a Moral Agent?’, International Review of Information Ethics 6, 23–30.
    Sullins, J. P. 2007. ‘Friends by Design: A Design Philosophy for Personal Robotics Technology’, in Vermaas, P. E., Kroes, P., Light, A. and Moore, S. A. (eds.), Philosophy and Design: From Engineering to Architecture. Dordrecht: Springer.
    Sullins, J. P. 2008. ‘The Role of Artificial Moral Agency in Technoethics’, in Handbook of Research on Technoethics, New York: Idea Group Inc.
    ,Sunderland City Council 2008. ‘Digital Challenge’, www.sunderland.gov.uk/wherepeoplematter/
    Sunstein, C. 2001. republic.com. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
    Sunstein, C. 2005. Laws of Fear: Beyond the Precautionary Principle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Tavani, H. T. 1999. ‘Informational Privacy, Data Mining, and the Internet’, Ethics and Information Technology 1(2), 137–145.
    Tavani, H. T. 2002. ‘The Uniqueness Debate in Computer Ethics: What Exactly Is at Issue, and Why Does it Matter?’, Ethics and Information Technology 4(1), 37–54.
    Tavani, H. T. 2005. ‘The Impact of the Internet on Our Moral Condition: Do We Need a New Framework of Ethics’, in Cavalier, R. (ed.), The Impact of the Internet on Our Moral Lives, pp. 215–238. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
    Tavani, H. T. 2007. Ethics and Technology: Ethical Issues in an Age of Information and Communication Technology (2nd edn). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
    Tavani, H. T. 2008. ‘Floridi's Ontological Theory of Informational Privacy: Some Implications and Challenges’, Ethics and Information Technology 10(2–3), 155–156.
    Tavani, H. T. 2010. Ethics and Technology: Controversies: Questions and Strategies for Ethical Computing. (3rd edn) Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
    Taylor, C. 2002. ‘Democracy, Inclusive and Exclusive’, in Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swiderl, A. and Tipton, S. M. (eds.), Meaning and Modernity: Religion, Polity, and Self, pp. 181–194. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Tedjasaputra, A. 2007. ‘Digestible RFID Tag: An Alternative for Your Internal Body Monitoring’, RFID Community in Asia: www.rfid-asia.info/2007/02/digestible-rfid-tag-alternative-for.htm
    Thaler, R. H. and Sunstein, C. R., 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    ,The Economist, 18 December 1997, ‘1897 and 1997 – the Century the Earth Stood Still’.
    ,The High Court of Australia: Dow Jones and Company Inc v Gutnick [2002] HCA 56; 210 CLR 575; 194 ALR 433; 77 ALJR 255 (10 December 2002), www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2002/56.html
    Thomas, J. 2004. ‘Cyberpoaching behind the keyboard: Uncoupling the ethics of “virtual infidelity”’, in Waskul, D. D. (ed.), net.seXXX: Readings on Sex, Pornography, and the Internet, pp. 149–77. New York: Peter Lang.
    Thomas, T. 1997. ‘The Threat of Information Operations: A Russian Perspective’, in Pfaltzgraff, R. and Shultz, R. (eds.), War in the Information Age. London: Brassey's.
    Thomasson, A. L. 2003. ‘Realism and Human Kinds’, in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, LXVII (3), 580–609.
    Thompson, A. 1996. Hardware Evolution: Automatic Design of Electronic Circuits in Reconfigurable Hardware by Artificial Evolution. London: Springer-Verlag.
    Thorseth, M. 2006. ‘Worldwide Deliberation and Public Use of Reason Online’, Ethics and Information Technology 8(4), 243–252.
    Thorseth, M. 2007. ‘Ethical Pluralism’, in Collste, G. (ed.), Perspectives on Applied Ethics (Studies in Applied Ethics 10), pp. 41–55. Linköping: Centre for Applied Ethics, Linköping University.
    Thorseth, M. 2008. ‘Reflective Judgment and Enlarged Thinking Online’, Ethics and Information Technology 10(4), 221–231.
    Torremans, P. 2005. Holyoak and Torremans Intellectual Property Law (4th edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Turilli, M. 2007. ‘Ethical Protocols Design’, Ethics and Information Technology 9, 49–62.
    Turilli, M. 2008. ‘Ethics and the Practice of Software Design’, in Waelbers, K.Brey, P. A. and Briggle, A. (eds.), Current Issues in Computing and Philosophy, pp. 171–183. IOS Press.
    Turing, A. M. 1950. ‘Computing Machinery and Intelligence’, Mind 59, 433–460.
    Turkle, S. 2005. ‘Relational Artifacts/Children/Elders: The Complexities of Cybercompanions’. In ‘Toward Social Mechanisms of Android Science. A CogSci-2005 Workshop’, Cognitive Science Society62–73. www.androidscience.com/proceedings2005/TurkleCogSci2005AS.pdf
    Turkle, S., Taggart, W., Kidd, C. D. and Dasté, O. 2006. ‘Relational Artifacts with Children and Elders: The Complexities of Cybercompanionship’, Connection Science 18, 347–361.
    Turner, E. 1998. ‘The Case for Responsibility of the Computing Industry to Promote Equal Presentation of Women and Men in Advertising Campaigns’, ETHICOMP98, Rotterdam.
    Turner, E. 1999. ‘Gender and Ethnicity of Computing, Perceptions of the Future Generation’, ETHICOMP99, Rome.
    ,UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) 1998. Human Development Report 1998. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    ,United Nations. 1948. ‘Universal Declaration of Human Rights’, www.un.org/Overview/rights.html
    ,United Nations Environment Programme. 1992. ‘Rio Declaration on Environment and Development 1992’, www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.asp?ArticleID=1163&DocumentID=78&l=en
    ,US Patent and Trademark Office. 2007. ‘United States Patent Application 20070300174’ Kind Code, A1, Macbeth; Steven, W. et al., (http://patft.uspto.gov) re US Patent Application 20070300174.
    Amerongen, M. 2008, ‘The Interpretation of Artefacts’, Simon Stevin series in the Philosophy of Technology, Delft.
    Caenegem, W. 2003. ‘Intellectual Property Law and the Idea of Progress’, Intellectual Property Quarterly 3, 237–256.
    Delden, J., Bolt, I., Kalis, A., Derjiks, J. and Leufkins, H. 2004. ‘Tailormade Pharmacotherapy: Future Developments and Ethical Challenges in the Field of Pharmacogenomics’, Bioethics 18(4), 303–321.
    Hoven, J. 1995. ‘Equal Access and Social Justice: Information as a Primary Good’, ETHICOMP9, Leicester: De Montfort University.
    Hoven, J. 1997. ‘Computer Ethics and Moral Methodology’, Metaphilosophy 28(3), 234–248.
    Hoven, J. 2005. ‘E-democracy, E-contestation and the Monitorial Citizen’, Ethics and Information Technology 7(2), 51–59.
    Hoven, J. 2008. ‘Moral Methodology and Information Technology’ in Himma, K. E. and Tavani, H. T. (eds.), 2008. The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics, pp. 49–69.
    Hoven, J., Miller, S. and Pogge, T. (2010, forthcoming). The Design Turn in Applied Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Hoven, J. and Rooksby, E. 2008. ‘Distributive Justice and the Value of Information: A (Broadly) Rawlsian Approach’, in Hoven, J. and Weckert, J. (eds.) Information Technology and Moral Philosophy, pp. 376–397. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Hoven, J. and Vermaas, P. 2007. ‘Nano-technology and Privacy: On Continuous Surveillance outside the Panopticon’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32(3), 283–297.
    Hoven, J. and Weckert, J. (eds.) 2008. Information Technology and Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Verbeek, P. P. 2005. What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design. PA: Penn State Press.
    Verton, D. 2003. Black Ice: The Invisible Threat of Cyber-Terrorism. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    W3C. 2004. ‘HTML and XHTML Frequently Answered Questions’. Available at www.w3.org/MarkUp/2004/xhtml-faq
    Waddington, D. 2007. ‘Locating the Wrongness in Ultra-violent Video Games’, Ethics and Information Technology 9(2), 121–128.
    Wajcman, J. 2004. TechnoFeminism. Cambridge, UK and Malden, MA: Polity.
    Wallach, W. and Allen, C. 2008. Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right from Wrong. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Walsham, G. 1995. ‘Interpretive Case Studies in IS Research: Nature and Method’, European Journal of Information Systems 4(2), 74–81.
    Walsham, G. 2001. Making a World of Difference – IT in a Global Context. Chichester: Wiley.
    Waltz, K. 1959. Man, the State, and War. New York: Columbia University Press.
    Walzer, M. 1977. Just and Unjust Wars. New York: Basic Books.
    Warschauer, Mark. 2003. ‘Dissecting the “Digital Divide”: A Case Study in Egypt’, The Information Society 19, 297–304.
    Warwick, K. 2004. I, Cyborg. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
    Warwick, S. 2001. ‘Is Copyright Ethical? An Examination of the Theories, Laws, and Practices Regarding the Private Ownership of Intellectual Work in the United States’, in Spinello, R. A. and Tavani, H T. (eds.), Readings in Cyberethics, pp. 263–279. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
    Waters, R. 2006. ‘US Group Implants Electronic Tags in Workers’, Financial Times, 12 February, www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0213-07.htm
    Wear, S. 1998. Informed Consent: Patient Autonomy and Physician Beneficence within Healthcare (2nd edn). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
    Weckert, J. 2001. ‘Computer Ethics: Future Directions’, Ethics and Information Technology 3(2), 93–96.
    Weckert, J. 2002. Trust, Corruption, and Surveillance in the Electronic Workplace', in Brunnstein, K. and Berleur, J. (eds.), Human Choice and Computers: Issues of Choice and Quality of Life in the Information Society, 17th IFIP World Computer Congress, Montreal, pp. 109–120. Boston: Kluwer.
    Weckert, J. 2005. ‘On-line Trust’, in Cavalier, R. (ed.), The Impact of the Internet on Our Moral Lives, pp. 95–117. Albany, NJ: SUNY Press.
    Weckert, J. (ed.) 2005. Electronic Monitoring in the Workplace: Controversies and Solutions. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
    Weckert, J. 2007. ‘Computer Ethics’ The International Library of Essays in Public and Professional Ethics. Aldershot: Ashgate.
    Weckert, J. and Moor, J. 2006. ‘The Precautionary Principle in Nanotechnology’, International Journal of Applied Philosophy 20(2), 191–204.
    Weimann, G. 2006. Terror on the Internet. Washington, DC: The United States Institute of Peace Press.
    Weinert, F. 2009. Copernicus, Darwin, and Freud: Revolutions in the History and Philosophy of Science. Oxford: Blackwell.
    Weizenbaum, J. 1965. ‘Eliza – a Computer Program for the Study of Natural Language Communication between Man and Machine’, Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery 9, 36–45.
    Weizenbaum, J. 1976. Computer Power and Human Reason. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
    Westin, A. F. 1968. Privacy and Freedom. New York: Atheneum.
    Wheeler, D. 2006. ‘Gender Sensitivity and the Drive for IT: Lessons from the NetCorps Jordan Project’, Ethics and Information Technology 8(3), 131–142.
    Wheeler, J. 1990. Information, Physics, Quantum: The Search for Links. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
    White, H., McConnell, E., Clipp, E., Branch, L. G., Sloane, R., Pieper, C. and Box, T. L. 2002. ‘A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Psychosocial Impact of Providing Internet Training and Access to Older Adults’, Aging and Mental Health 6(3), 213–221.
    White, L. J. 1967. ‘The Historical Roots of Our Ecological Crisis’, Science 155, 1203–1207.
    Wiegel, V.et al. 2005. ‘Privacy, Deontic Epistemic Action Logic and Software Agents’, Ethics and Information Technology 7(4), 251–264.
    Wiegel, V. 2006, ‘Building Blocks for Artificial Moral Agents’, in Proceeding EthicALife/ALifeX.
    Wiegel, V. 2007, Sopholab, Volker Stevin Series in Philosophy of Technology. Delft: Delft University of Technology.
    Wiener, N. 1948. Cybernetics: or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Wiener, N. 1950. The Human Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society. Houghton Mifflin.
    Wiener, N. 1954. The Human Use of Human Beings (2nd rev. edn). New York: Doubleday Anchor.
    Wiener, N. 1964. God & Golem, Inc.: A Comment on Certain Points Where Cybernetics Impinges on Religion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Winner, L. 1986. The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Winner, L. 1997. ‘Cyberlibertarian Myths and the Prospect for Community’, ACM Computers and Society 27(3), 14–19.
    Winner, L. 1999. ‘Do Artefacts Have Politics?’, in McKenzie, D. and Wajcman, J. (eds.) The Social Shaping of Technology, pp. 2–40. Buckingham: Open University Press.
    Winston, M. and Edelbach, R. 2008. Society, Ethics and Technology. (4th edn) Florence, KY: Wadsworth.
    Wittgenstein, L. 1953. Philosophical Investigations, Anscombe, G. E. M. and Rhees, R. (eds.), Anscombe, G. E. M. (trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.
    Wonderly, M. 2008. ‘A Humean Approach to Assessing the Moral Significance of Ultra-violent Video Games’, Ethics and Information Technology 10(1), 1–10.
    Wooldridge, M., 2000. Reasoning about Rational Agents, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    York, P. F. 2005. ‘Respect for the World: Universal Ethics and the Morality of Terraforming’, PhD Thesis, the University of Queensland.
    Young, I. M. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Yudkowsky, E. 2008. ‘Artificial Intelligence as a Positive and Negative Factor in Global Risk’, in Bostrom, N. and Circovic, M. (eds.) Global Catastrophic Risks, pp. 308–345. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    ,ZDNet. 2007. ‘Facebook Users Open to Cyberattacks, ID Theft?’, ZDNet, http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1009_22-157855.html

    Metrics

    Altmetric attention score

    Full text views

    Total number of HTML views: 0
    Total number of PDF views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    Book summary page views

    Total views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    * Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

    Usage data cannot currently be displayed.

    Accessibility standard: Unknown

    Why this information is here

    This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

    Accessibility Information

    Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.