Adamson, S. 2000. ‘A lovely little example. Word order options and category shift in the premodifying string’. In O. Fischer, A. Rosenbach and D. Stein (eds.) Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English, pp. 39–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Adolphs, S. 2008. Corpus and Context: Investigating Pragmatic Functions in Spoken Discourse. Studies in Corpus Linguistics 30. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
AHBEU 1996. American Heritage Book of English Usage. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Aijmer, K. 1996. Conversational Routines in English: Convention and Creativity. London: Longman.
Aijmer, K. 2002. English Discourse Particles: Evidence from a Corpus. Studies in Corpus Linguistics 10. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Åkerman, J. 2009. ‘A plea for pragmatics’. Synthese 170: 155–67.
Allan, K. 1976. ‘Collectivizing’. Archivum Linguisticum 7: 99–117.
Allan, K. 1980. ‘Nouns and countability’. Language 56: 541–67.
Allan, K. 1981. ‘Interpreting from context’. Lingua 53: 151–73.
Allan, K. 1986. Linguistic Meaning. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Allan, K. 2000. ‘Quantity implicatures and the lexicon’. In B. Peeters (ed.) The Lexicon–Encyclopedia Interface, pp. 169–218. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Allan, K. 2001. Natural Language Semantics. Oxford and Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Allan, K. 2006a. ‘Clause-type, primary illocution, and mood-like operators in English’. Language Sciences 28: 1–50.
Allan, K. 2006b. ‘Lexicon: structure’. In K. Brown (ed.) Encyclopedia of Languages and Linguistics, pp. 148–51. Oxford: Elsevier.
Allan, K. 2006c. ‘Inference: abduction, induction, deduction’. In K. Brown (ed.) Encyclopedia of Languages and Linguistics, pp. 651–4. Oxford: Elsevier.
Allan,K. 2010.TheWesternClassicalTradition.2ndexpandededition.London:Equinox.
Allan, K. (forthcoming). ‘The semantics of the perfect progressive in English’. Proce-edings of the conference ‘Space and time across languages and cultures’, Cambridge, April 2010.
Allan, K. and Burridge, K. 1991. Euphemism and Dysphemism: Language Used as Shield and Weapon. Oxford University Press.
Allan, K. and Burridge, K. 2006. Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge University Press.
Allen, C. and Bekoff, M. 1997. Species of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Allot, N. 2007. Pragmatics and Rationality. Unpublished PhD thesis, University College London.
Allwood, J. 1972. ‘Negation and the strength of presupposition’. Logical Grammar Reports No. 2. Department of Linguistics, University of Göteborg, Sweden.
Allwood, J. 1977. ‘Negation and the strength of presupposition’. Revised version in Ö. Dahl (ed.) Logic, Pragmatics, and Grammar, pp. 11–52. Department of Linguistics, University of Göteborg.
Alston, W. P. 2000. Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Andersen, G. 2001. Pragmatic Markers and Sociolinguistic Variation. A Relevance-theoretic Approach to the Language of Adolescents. Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 84. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Andersen, H. 2001. ‘Actualization and the (uni)directionality of change’. In H. Andersen (ed.) Actualization: Linguistic Change in Progress, pp. 225–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Anscombe, G. E. M. 1957. Intention. Oxford: Blackwell.
Anscombre, J.-C. and Ducrot, O. 1976. ‘L’argumentation dans la langue’. Langages 42: 5–27.
Anscombre, J.-C. and Ducrot, O. 1977. ‘Deux mais en français?’ Lingua 43: 23–40.
Ariel, M. 1983. ‘Linguistic marking of social prominence: The Hebrew mi she introducer’. Journal of Pragmatics 7: 389–409.
Ariel, M. 1988. ‘Referring and accessibility’. Journal of Linguistics 24: 65–87.
Ariel, M. 1990. Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents. London: Routledge.
Ariel, M. 1994. ‘Interpreting anaphoric expressions: A cognitive versus a pragmatic approach’. Journal of Linguistics 30: 3–42.
Ariel, M. 1999. ‘Mapping so-called “pragmatic” phenomena according to a “linguistic-extralinguistic” distinction: The case of propositions marked “accessible”’. In M. Darnell, E. A. Moravcsik, F. J. Newmeyer, M. Noonan and K. M. Wheatley (eds.) Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics, vol. ii: Case Studies (Studies in Language Companion Series 41), pp. 11–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ariel, M. 2000. ‘The development of person agreement markers: From pronouns to higher accessibility markers’. In M. Barlow and S. Kemmer (eds.) Usage-Based Models of Language, pp. 197–260. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Ariel, M. 2001. ‘Accessibility theory: An overview’. In T. J. M. Sanders, J. Schilper-oord and W. Spooren (eds.) Text Representation: Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Aspects, pp. 29–87. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ariel, M. 2002. ‘Privileged interactional interpretations’. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 1003–44.
Ariel, M. 2004. ‘Most’. Language 80: 658–706.
Ariel, M. 2008a. ‘Xaval al ha-zman (‘It's a shame on the time’): In memory of Tanya Reinhart’. Paper presented at a conference in memory of Professor Tanya Reinhart, Tel Aviv University.
Ariel, M. 2008b. Pragmatics and Grammar. Cambridge University Press.
Ariel, M. 2009. ‘Testing the boundaries: Scalarity and the argument from discourse’. Unpublished ms. Tel Aviv University.
Ariel, M. 2010. Defining Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
Aristotle. 1963. Categories and De Interpretatione. Trans. J. L. Ackrill. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Arkell-Hardwicke, A. 1903. An Ivory Trader in North Kenya. London: Longmans, Green and Co.
Arundale, R. 1999. ‘An alternative model and ideology of communication for an alternative to politeness theory’, Pragmatics 9: 119–53.
Arundale, R. 2005. ‘Pragmatics, conversational implicature, and conversation’. In K. Fitch and R. Sanders (eds.) Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, pp. 41–63. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Arundale, R. 2006a. ‘Face as relational and interactional: A communication framework for research on face, facework, and politeness’. Journal of Politeness Research 2: 193–216.
Arundale, R. 2006b. ‘Arguing participants’ achieving of relationship in talk: Notes towards an examination’. Unpublished ms. University of Alaska, Fairbanks.
Arundale, R. 2008. ‘Against (Gricean) intentions at the heart of human interaction’. Intercultural Pragmatics 5: 231–56.
Arundale, R. 2010a. ‘Constituting face in conversation: Face, facework, and interactional achievement’. Journal of Pragmatics 42: 2078–105.
Arundale, R. 2010b. ‘Relating’. In M. Locher and S. Lambert Graham (eds.) Handbook of Pragmatics, vol. vi: Interpersonal Pragmatics, pp. 137–66. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Arundale, R. and Good, D. 2002. ‘Boundaries and sequences in studying conversation’. In A. Fetzer and C. Meierkord (eds.) Rethinking Sequentiality: Linguistics Meets Conversational Interaction, pp. 121–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Asher, N. 1986. ‘Belief in Discourse Representation Theory’. Journal of Philosophical Logic 15: 127–89.
Asher, N. and Lascarides, A. 1998. ‘The semantics and pragmatics of presupposition’. Journal of Semantics 15: 239–99.
Asher, N. and Lascarides, A. 2003. Logics of Conversation. Cambridge University Press.
Astington, J., Harris, P. and Olson, D. (eds.) 1988. Developing Theories of Mind. Cambridge University Press.
Athanasiadou, A., Canakis, C. and Cornillie, B. (eds.) 2006. Subjectification: Various Paths to Subjectivity. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Atlas, J. 1974. ‘Presupposition, ambiguity, and generality: A coda to the Russell-Strawson debate on referring’. Unpublished ms. Claremont: Pomona College.
Atlas, J. 1975a. ‘Frege's polymorphous concept of presupposition and its role in a theory of meaning’. Semantikos 1: 29–44.
Atlas, J. 1975b. ‘Presupposition: a semantic-pragmatic account’. Pragmatics Microfiche 1.4. D13–G9.
Atlas, J. 1977. ‘Negation, ambiguity, and presupposition’. Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 321–36.
Atlas, J. 1979. ‘How linguistics matters to philosophy: Presupposition, truth, and meaning’. In D. Dinneen and C. K. Oh (eds.) Syntax and Semantics 11: Presupposition, pp. 265–81. New York: Academic Press.
Atlas, J. 1980. ‘Reference, meaning, and translation’. Philosophical Books 21: 129–40.
Atlas, J. 1981. ‘Is “not” logical?’. In Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic, pp. 124–8. New York: The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
Atlas, J. 1988. ‘What are negative existence statements about?’. Linguistics and Philosophy 11: 371–93.
Atlas, J. 1989. Philosophy without Ambiguity. Oxford University Press.
Atlas, J. 1991a. Review of The Limits to Debate: A Revised Theory of Semantic Presupposition, Noel Burton-Roberts (Cambridge University Press, 1989). Mind and Language 6: 177–92.
Atlas, J. 1991b. ‘Topic/comment, presupposition, logical form, and focus stress implicatures: The case of focal particles only and also’. Journal of Semantics 8: 127–47.
Atlas, J. 1993. ‘The importance of being “only”: Testing the neo-Gricean versus neo-entailment paradigms’. Journal of Semantics 10: 301–18.
Atlas, J. 1996. ‘“Only” noun phrases, pseudo-negative generalized quantifiers, negative polarity items, and monotonicity’. Journal of Semantics 13: 265–329.
Atlas, J. 1997. ‘Negative adverbials, prototypical negation, and the de Morgan taxonomy’. Journal of Semantics 14: 349–67.
Atlas, J. 2001. ‘Negative quantifier noun phrases: A typology and an acquisition hypothesis’. In J. Hoeksema, H. Rullman, V. Sánchez-Valencia and T. van der Wouden (eds.) Perspectives on Negation and Polarity Items, pp. 1–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Atlas, J. 2004a. ‘Presupposition’. In L. R. Horn and G. Ward (eds.) The Handbook of Pragmatics, pp. 29–52. Oxford: Blackwell.
Atlas, J. 2004b. ‘Descriptions, linguistic topic/comment, and negative existentials: A case study in the application of linguistic theory to problems in the philosophy of language’. In M. Reimer and A. Bezuidenhout (eds.) Descriptions and Beyond, pp. 342–60. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Atlas, J. 2005. Logic, Meaning, and Conversation: Semantical Underdeterminacy, Implicature, And Their Interface. New York: Oxford University Press.
Atlas, J. 2007a. ‘On a pragmatic explanation of negative polarity item licensing’. In N. Burton-Roberts (ed.) Advances in Pragmatics, pp. 10–23. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Atlas, J. 2007b. ‘Meanings, propositions, context, semantical underdeterminacy’. In G. Preyer and G. Peter (eds.) Context-Sensitivity and Semantic Minimalism, pp. 217–39. Oxford University Press.
Atlas, J. and Levinson, S. 1981. ‘It-clefts, informativeness and logical form’. In P. Cole (ed.) Radical Pragmatics, pp. 1–62. New York: Academic Press.
Auer, P. 2009. ‘Context and contextualization’. In J. Verschueren and J. O. Östman (eds.) Key Notions in Pragmatics, pp. 86–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Austen, J. 1811. Sense and Sensibility. London: T. Egerton.
Austin, J. L. 1961. Philosophical Papers. Oxford University Press.
Austin, J. L. 1962. How to Do Things With Words. The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford University Press.
Austin, J. L. 1975. How to Do Things With Words. 2nd edition. Oxford University Press.
Auwera, J. van der. 1986. ‘Conditionals and speech-acts’. In E. C. Traugott, A. Meulen, J. S. Reilly and C. A. Ferguson (eds.) On Conditionals. Cambridge University Press.
Van Der Auwera, J. 1997a. ‘Conditional perfection’. In A. Athanasiadou and R. Dirven (eds.) On Conditionals Again, pp. 169–90. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Van Der Auwera, J. 1997b. ‘Pragmatics in the last quarter century: the case of conditional perfection’. Journal of Pragmatics 27: 261–74.
Van Der Auwera, J. 2001. ‘On the typology of negative modals’. In J. Hoeksema, H. Rullmann and V. Sánchez-Valencia (eds.) Perspectives on Negation and Polarity Items, pp. 23–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Auwera, J. van der and Bultinck, B. 2001. ‘On the lexical typology of modals, quantifiers, and connectives’. In I. Kenesei and R. M. Harnish (eds.) Perspectives on Semantics, Pragmatics, and Discourse: A Festschrift for Ferenc Kiefer, pp. 173–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Auwera, J. van der and Lejeune, L. 2005. ‘The morphological imperative’. In M. Haspelmath (ed.) The World Atlas of Language Structures, pp. 286–9. Oxford University Press.
Bach, E. 1980. ‘Tenses and aspects as functions on verb-phrases’. In C. Rohrer (ed.) Time, Tense, and Quantifiers, pp. 19–37. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Bach, K. 1982. ‘Semantic non-specificity and mixed quantifiers’. Linguistics and Philosophy 4: 593–605.
Bach, K. 1987. ‘On communicative intentions: A reply to Recanati’. Mind and Language 2: 141–54.
Bach, K. 1992. ‘Communicative intentions, plan recognition, and pragmatics: comments on Thomason and Littman and Allen’. In P. R. Cohen, J. Morgan and M. E. Pollack (eds.) Intentions in Communication, pp. 389–400. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Bach, K. 1994a. ‘Conversational impliciture’. Mind and Language 9: 124–62.
Bach, K. 1994b. ‘Semantic slack: What is said and more’. In S. L. Tsohatzidis (ed.) Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives, pp. 267–91. London: Routledge.
Bach, K. 1999a. ‘The myth of conventional implicature’. Linguistics and Philosophy 22: 327–66.
Bach, K. 1999b. ‘The semantics-pragmatics distinction: What it is and why it matters’. In K. Turner (ed.) The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View, pp. 65–83. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
Bach, K. 2000. ‘Reply to Stanley and Szabó’. Mind and Language 15: 262–83.
Bach, K. 2001. ‘You don't say?’. Synthese 128: 15–44.
Bach, K. 2004. ‘Descriptions: Points of reference’. In A. Bezuidenhout and M. Reimer (eds.) Descriptions and Beyond, pp. 189–229. Oxford University Press.
Bach, K. 2005. ‘Context ex machina’. In Z. G. Szabó (ed.) Semantics versus Pragmatics, pp. 15–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bach, K. 2006a. ‘Review of Christopher Potts, The Logic of Conventional Implicatures’. Journal of Linguistics 42: 490–5.
Bach, K. 2006b. ‘The excluded middle: Semantic minimalism without minimal propositions’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73: 435–42.
Bach, K. 2006c. ‘The top 10 misconceptions about implicature’. In B. Birner and G. Ward (eds.), Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning, pp. 21–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bach, K. 2006d. ‘What does it take to refer?’. In E. Lepore and B. C. Smith (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Language, pp. 515–54. Oxford University Press.
Bach, K. 2007. ‘Regressions in pragmatics (and semantics)’. In N. Burton-Roberts (ed.) Advances in Pragmatics, pp. 24–44. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bach, K. 2010. ‘Implicature vs. explicature: What's the difference?’. In B. Soria and E. Romero (eds.) Explicit Communication: Robyn Carston's Pragmatics, pp. 126–37. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bach, K. and Harnish, R. 1979. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bach, K. and Harnish, R. 1992. ‘How performatives really work: a reply to Searle’. Linguistics and Philosophy 15: 92–110.
Bachman, L. F. 1990. Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford University Press.
Bak, S. Y. 1977. ‘Topicalization in Korean’. University of Hawaii Working Papers in Linguistics 9.2: 63–88.
Bannard, C. and Lieven, E. 2009. ‘Repetition and reuse in child language learning’. In R. Corrigan, E. A. Moravcsik, H. Ouali and K. M. Wheatley (eds.) Formulaic Language, Vol.ii. Acquisition, Loss, Psychological Reality, and Functional Explanations, pp. 299–321. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Bara, B. G. 2010. Cognitive Pragmatics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Baranzini, L. and de Saussure, L. 2009. ‘Deixis temporelle argumentative: Remarques sur le français maintenant et l'italien adesso’. In C. Maas and A. Schrott (eds.), Wenn Deiktika nicht Zeigen: zeigende und nichtzeigende Funktionen deiktischer Formen in den romanischen Sprachen, pp. 53–71. Münster and Hamburg: Lit Verlag.
Bar-Hillel, Y. 1971. ‘Out of the pragmatic wastebasket’. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 401–7.
Barker, S. 2003. ‘Truth and conventional implicature’. Mind 112: 1–33.
Barker, S. 2004. Renewing Meaning: A Speech-Act Theoretic Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Barkow, J., Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J. 1995. The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. Oxford University Press.
Bar-Lev, Z. and Palacas, A. 1980. ‘Semantic command over pragmatic priority’. Lingua 51: 137–46.
Barnes, S. B. 2003. Computer-Mediated Communication: Human-to-Human Communication Across the Internet. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Baron-Cohen, S. 1995. Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Barsalou, L. 1983. ‘Ad hoc categories’. Memory and Cognition 11: 211–27.
Barsalou, L. 1987. ‘The instability of graded structure in concepts’. In N. Neisser (ed.) Concepts and Conceptual Development, pp. 101–40. Cambridge University Press.
Barsalou, L. 1999. ‘Perceptual symbol systems’. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22: 577–660.
Barwise, J. and Perry, J. 1983. Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bates, E. 1976. Language and Context: The Acquisition of Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.
Bates, E. 1999. ‘On the nature and nurture of language’. In E. Bizzi, P. Calissano and V. Volterra (eds.) Frontiere della biologia [Frontiers of biology]. The brain of homo sapiens, pp. 241–65. Rome: Giovanni Trecanni.
Bates, E. and MacWhinney, B. J. 1989. ‘Functionalism and the competition model’. In B. J. MacWhinney and E. Bates (eds.) The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing, pp. 3–73. Cambridge University Press.
Bateson, G. 1972. Steps of an Ecology of Mind. Toronto: Chandler Publishing Company.
Bauer, L. 1983. English Word-Formation. Cambridge University Press.
Baxter, L. and Montgomery, B. 1996. Relating: Dialogues and Dialectics. New York: Guilford.
Bayraktaroglu, A. 1991. ‘Politeness and interactional imbalance’. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 92: 5–34.
Beall, J. C. (ed.) 2003. Liars and Heaps: New Essays on Paradox. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Beaney, M. (ed.) 1997. The Frege Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.
Beardsley, M. C. 1958. Aesthetics. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
Beaugrande, R. de and Dressler, W. 1981. Einführung in die Textlinguistik. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Beaver, D. 1994. ‘Accommodating topics’. In P. Bosch and R. van der Sandt (eds.) Focus and Natural Language Processing, Vol. iii: Discourse, pp. 439–48. Heidelberg: IBM Germany, IBM Deutschland, Scientific Centre.
Beaver, D. 1995. Presupposition and Assertion in Dynamic Semantics. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.
Beaver, D. 2001. Presupposition and Assertion in Dynamic Semantics. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Beaver, D. and Lee, H. 2003. ‘Input-output mismatches in OT’. In R. Blutner and H. Zeevat (eds.) Pragmatics and Optimality Theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Becchio, C. and Bertone, C. 2004. ‘Wittgenstein running: neural mechanisms of collective intentionality and we-mode’. Consciousness and Cognition 13: 123–33.
Becchio, C. and Bertone, C. 2010. ‘Intention’. In L. Cummings (ed.) The Pragmatics Encyclopedia, pp. 226–7. London: Routledge.
Becchio, C., Adenzato, M. and Bara, B. 2006. ‘How the brain understands intention: different neural circuits identify the componential features of motor and prior intentions’. Consciousness and Cognition 15: 64–74.
Beeching, K. 2002. Gender, Politeness and Pragmatic Particles in French. Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 104. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Benveniste, É. 1966. Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Gallimard.
Benveniste, É. 1971. ‘Subjectivity in language’. In Problems in General Linguistics, pp. 223–30, trans. M. E. Meek. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press (first published in French 1958).
Bergmann, M. 1982. ‘Metaphorical assertions’. Philosophical Review 91: 229–42.
Berlin, B. and Kay, P. 1969. Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Bertinetto, P. M. 2000. ‘The progressive in Romance, as compared to English’. In F. Plank and O. Dahl (eds.) Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, pp. 559–604. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Besnier, N. 2000. Tuvaluan: A Polynesian Language of Central Pacific. London/New York: Routledge.
Bezuidenhout, A. 1997. ‘How context-dependent are attitude ascriptions?’ In D. Jutronic (ed.) The Maribor Papers in Naturalized Semantics, pp. 269–84. University of Maribor.
Bezuidenhout, A. 2001. ‘Metaphor and what is said: a defense of a direct expression view of metaphor’. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 25: 156–86.
Bezuidenhout, A. 2002a. ‘Generalized conversational implicatures and default pragmatic inferences’. In J. Campbell, M. O’Rourke and D. Shier (eds.) Meaning and Truth: Investigations in Philosophical Semantics, pp. 257–83. New York: Seven Bridges Press.
Bezuidenhout, A. 2002b. ‘Truth-conditional pragmatics’. Philosophical Perspectives 16: 105–34.
Bezuidenhout, A. and Cutting, J. C. 2002. ‘Literal meaning, minimal propositions, and pragmatic processing’. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 433–56.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. and Finegan, E. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
Biletzki, A. 1996. ‘Is there a history of pragmatics?’ Journal of Pragmatics 25: 455–70.
Bilmes, J. 1986. Discourse and Behaviour. New York: Plenum Press.
Birner, B. J. and Ward, G. 1998. Information Status and Non-Canonical Word Order in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Blackburn, P. and Meyer-Viol, G. 1994. ‘Linguistics, logic and finite trees’. Bulletin of Interest Group of Pure and Applied Logics 2: 2–39.
Blakemore, D. 1987. Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.
Blakemore, D. 1992. Understanding Utterances: An Introduction to Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Blakemore, D. 2000. ‘Procedures and indicators: nevertheless and but’. Journal of Linguistics 36: 463–86.
Blakemore, D. 2002. Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge University Press.
Blakemore, D. and Carston, R. 1999. ‘The pragmatics of and-conjunctions: the non-narrative cases’. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 11: 1–20.
Blakemore, D. and Carston, R. 2005. ‘The pragmatics of sentential coordination with and’. Lingua 115: 569–89.
Blank, A. 1997. Prinzipien des lexikalischen Bedeutungswandels am Beispiel der romanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Blank, A. 1999. ‘Why do new meanings occur? A cognitive typology of the motivations for lexical semantic change’. In A. Blank and P. Koch (eds.) Historical Semantics and Cognition, pp. 61–89. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Blitvich, P. G. C. 2010. ‘A genre approach to the study of im-politeness’. International Review of Pragmatics 2: 46–94.
Blommaert, J. 2005. Discourse. A Critical Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Blommaert, J. 2007. ‘Sociolinguistic scales’. Intercultural Pragmatics 4: 1–19.
Bloor, T. and Bloor, M. 1995. The Functional Analysis of English: A Hallidayan Approach. London: Arnold.
Blum-Kulka, S. 1987. ‘Indirectness and politeness in requests: same or different?’. Journal of Pragmatics 11: 131–46.
Blum-Kulka, S., House, J. and Kasper, G. (eds.) 1989. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Blum-Kulka, S., Blondheim, M., House, J., Kasper, G. and Wagner, J. 2008. ‘Intercultural pragmatics, language and society’. In P. van Sterkenburg (ed.) Unity and Diversity of Languages, pp. 155–73. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Blutner, R. 1998. ‘Lexical pragmatics’. Journal of Semantics 15: 115–62.
Blutner, R. 2004. ‘Pragmatics and the lexicon’. In L. Horn and G. Ward (eds.) The Handbook of Pragmatics, pp. 488–515. Oxford: Blackwell.
Blutner, R. 2009. ‘Lexical pragmatics’. In L. Cummings (ed.) The Pragmatics Encyclopedia, pp. 226–7. London: Routledge.
Blutner, R. and Jäger, G. 2003. ‘Competition and interpretation: The German adverb wieder (“again”)’. In C. Fabricius-Hansen, E. Lang and C.Maienborn (eds.) Modifying Adjuncts, pp. 393–416. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Boër, S. and Lycan, W. 1976. ‘The myth of semantic presupposition’. In Ohio State Working Papers in Linguistics 21, pp. 1–90. Department of Linguistics, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Bohnemeyer, J. 2002. The Grammar of Time Reference in Yucatec Maya. Munich: Lincom Europa.
Bohnemeyer, J. 2009. ‘Temporal anaphora in a tenseless language’. In W. Klein and P. Li (eds.) The Expression of Time, pp. 83–128. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bohnemeyer, J. and Stolz, C. 2006. ‘Spatial reference in Yukatek Maya: A survey’. In S. C. Levinson and D. Wilkins (eds.) Grammars of Space, pp. 273–310. Cambridge University Press.
Bolinger, D. 1961. ‘Contrastive accent and contrastive stress’. Language 37: 87–96.
Bolinger, D. 1972. That's That. The Hague: Mouton.
Bolinger, D. 1980. Language: The Loaded Weapon. London: Longman.
Bolinger, D. 1983a. ‘The inherent iconism of intonation’. In J. Haiman (ed.) Iconicity in Syntax, pp. 97–109. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bolinger, D. 1983b. ‘Where does intonation belong?’. Journal of Semantics 2: 101–20.
Bonelli, E. T. 1992. ‘All I’m saying is …: The correlation of form and function in pseudo-cleft sentences’. Literary and Linguistic Computing 2: 30–41.
Bonnefon, J. F., Feeney, A. and Villejoubert, G. 2009. ‘When some is actually all: Scalar inferences in face-threatening contexts’. Cognition 112: 249–58.
Bontly, T. 2005. ‘Modified Occam's Razor: Parsimony arguments and pragmatic explanations’. Mind and Language 20: 288–312.
Borg, E. 2004. Minimal Semantics. Oxford University Press.
Borg, E. 2007. ‘Minimalism versus contextualism in semantics’. In G. Preyer and G. Peter (eds.) Context-Sensitivity and Semantic Minimalism, pp. 339–59. Oxford University Press.
Borg, E. 2009a. ‘Minimal semantics and the nature of psychological evidence’. In S. Sawyer (ed.) New Waves in Philosophy of Language, pp. 24–40. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Borg, E. 2009b. ‘Must a semantic minimalist be a semantic internalist?’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume LXXXIII: 31–51.
Borg, E. (forthcoming). Pursuing Meaning. Oxford University Press.
Bos, J. 2003. ‘Implementing the binding and accommodation theory of anaphora resolution and presupposition projection’. Computational Linguistics 29: 179–210.
Bos, J., Buitelaar, P. and Mineur, A. M. 1995. ‘Bridging as coercive accommodation’. In W. N. E. Klein, S. Manandhar and J. Siekmann (eds.) Working Notes on the Edinburgh Conference on Computational Logic and Natural Language Processing (CLNLP-95), pp. 1–16: Human Communications Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, South Queensferry, Scotland.
Bosch, P. and van der Sandt, R. (eds.) 1999. Focus: Linguistic, Cognitive and Computational Perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
Bott, L. and Noveck, I. A. 2004. ‘Some utterances are underinformative: the onset and time course of scalar inferences’. Journal of Memory and Language 51: 437–57.
Bourdieu, P. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Trans. R. Nice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bousfield, D. 2008. Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bousfield, D. and Culpeper, J. 2008. ‘Impoliteness: Eclecticism and diaspora’. Journal of Politeness Research 4: 161–337.
Bousfield, D. and Locher, M. (eds.) 2008. Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bowerman, M. and Choi, S. 2003. ‘Space under construction: Language-specific spatial categorization in first language acquisition’. In D. Gentner and S. Goldin-Meadow (eds.) Language in Mind, pp. 387–427. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bowerman, M. and Pederson, E. 1992. ‘Crosslinguistic perspectives on topological spatial relationships’. Paper presented to Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, San Francisco.
Boxer, D. 2002. ‘Discourse issues in cross-cultural pragmatics’. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 22: 150–67.
Brandom, R. 1994. Making It Explicit. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bratman, M. 1987. Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bratman, M. 1992. ‘Shared cooperative activity’. The Philosophical Review 101: 327–41.
Bratman, M. 1993. ‘Shared intention’. Ethics 104: 99–113.
Bratman, M. 1999. Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Brazil, D. 1975. The Communicative Value of Intonation in English. University of Birmingham Press.
Bréal, M. 1964. Semantics: Studies in the Science of Meaning. Trans. Mrs. Henry Cust. New York: Dover (first published in French 1900).
Breban, T. 2008. ‘The grammaticalization and subjectification of English adjectives expressing difference into plurality/distributivity markers and quantifiers’. Folia Linguistica 42: 259–306.
Breban, T. 2010. English Adjectives of Comparison: Lexical and Grammaticalized Uses. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Breheny, R. 2006. ‘Communication and folk psychology’. Mind and Language 21: 74–107.
Breheny, R., Katsos, N. and Williams, J. 2006. ‘Are generalised scalar implicatures generated by default? An on-line investigation into the role of context in generating pragmatic inferences’. Cognition 100: 434–63.
Brems, L. 2007. The Synchronic Layering of Size Noun and Type Noun Constructions in English. Doctoral dissertation, University of Leuven.
Brentano, F. 1874. Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt. Leipzig: Duncker and Humblot. (Trans. as Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint by A. C. Rancurello, D. B. Terrell, and L. L. McAlister in 1973. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.)
Breul, C. 2007. ‘A relevance-theoretic view on issues in the history of clausal connectives’. In U. Lenker and A. Meurman-Solin (eds.) Connectives in the History of English, pp. 167–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Brinton, L. 1996. Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Function. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Brinton, L. 2008. The Comment Clause in English. Cambridge University Press.
Brisard, F., Frisson, S. and Sandra, D. 2001. ‘Processing unfamiliar metaphors in a self-paced reading task’. Metaphor and Symbol 16: 87–108.
Brown, G. and Yule, G. 1983. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Brown, P. 1994. ‘The INs and ONs of Tzeltal locative expressions: The semantics of static descriptions of location’. Linguistics 32: 743–90.
Brown, P. 1995. ‘Politeness strategies and the attribution of intentions: the case of Tzeltal irony’. In E. Goody (ed.) Social Intelligence and Interaction: Expressions and Implications of the Social Bias in Human Intelligence, pp. 153–74. Cambridge University Press.
Brown, P. 2006. ‘A sketch of the grammar of space in Tzeltzal’. In S. C. Levinson and D. Wilkins (eds.) Grammars of Space, pp. 230–72. Cambridge University Press.
Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press (first published 1978).
Brown, R. and Gilman, A. 1960/2003. ‘The pronouns of power and solidarity’. In T. A. Sebeok (ed.) Style in Language, pp. 253–76. Cambridge, MA: MIT. Reprinted in C. B. Paulston and R. Tucker (eds.) Sociolinguistics: The Essential Readings, pp. 156–76. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bublitz, W. 2009. Englische Pragmatik: Eine Einführung. 2nd edition. Grundlagen der Anglistik und Amerikanistik 21. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.
Bublitz, W., Jucker, A. H. and Schneider, K. P. (eds.) 2010–. Handbooks of Pragmatics. 9 vols. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Bührig, K. and Ten Thije, J. D. (eds.) 2006. Beyond Misunderstanding: Linguistic Analyses of Intercultural Communication. Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 144. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Büring, D. 1999. ‘Topic’. In P. Bosch and R. van der Sandt (eds.) Focus: Linguistic, Cognitive and Computational Perspectives, pp. 142–65. Cambridge University Press.
Büring, D. 2010. ‘Towards a typology of focus realization’. In M. Zimmermann and C. Féry (eds.) Information Structure: Theoretical, Typological, and Experimental Perspectives, pp. 177–205. Oxford University Press.
Busse, U. and Busse, B. 2010. ‘Shakespeare’. In A. H. Jucker and I. Taavitsainen (eds.) Handbook of Historical Pragmatics (Handbooks of Pragmatics 8), pp. 247–84. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bybee, J. 2006. ‘From usage to grammar: The mind's response to repetition’. Language 82: 711–33.
Bybee, J. 2007. ‘Diachronic linguistics’. In D. Geeraerts and H. Cuyckens (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, pp. 945–87. Oxford University Press.
Bybee, J. and Pagliuca, W. 1987. ‘The evolution of future meaning’. In A. Giacalone Ramat, O. Carruba and G. Bernini (eds.) Papers from the 7th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, pp. 108–22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bybee, J., Perkins, R. D. and Pagliuca, W. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. University of Chicago Press.
Call, J. and Tomasello, M. 2008. ‘Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later’. Trends in Cognitive Science 12: 187–92.
Call, J., Bräuer, J., Kaminski, J. and Tomasello, M. 2003. ‘Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) are sensitive to the attentional state of humans’. Journal of Comparative Psychology 117: 257–63.
Cameron, D. 2006. ‘LANGUAGE: European you-nity’. Critical Quarterly 48: 132–5.
Camp, E. 2006. ‘Contextualism, metaphor, and what is said’. Mind and Language 21: 280–309.
Cann, R., Kempson, R. and Marten, L. 2005. The Dynamics of Language. Dordrecht: Elsevier.
Cann, R., Purver, M. and Kempson, R. 2007. ‘Context and wellformedness: the dynamics of ellipsis’. Research on Language and Computation 5: 333–58.
Cappelen, H. and Lepore, E. 2005a. Insensitive Semantics: a Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism. Oxford: Blackwell.
Cappelen, H. and Lepore, E. 2005b. ‘A tall tale: in defense of semantic minimalism and speech act pluralism’. In G. Preyer and G. Peter (eds.) Contextualism in Philosophy: Knowledge, Meaning, and Truth, pp. 197–219. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Carassa, A. and Colombetti, M. 2009. ‘Joint meaning’. Journal of Pragmatics 41: 1837–54.
Carnap, R. 1938. ‘Foundations of logic and mathematics’. In O. Neurath, R. Carnap and C. Morris (eds.) International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, vol. i, pp. 139–214. University of Chicago Press.
Carnap, R. 1942. Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Carnap, R. 1947. Meaning and Necessity. University of Chicago Press.
Carrell, P. L. 1981. ‘Children's understanding of indirect requests: comparing child and adult comprehension’. Journal of Child Language 8: 329–45.
Carruthers, P. and Smith, P. (eds.) 1996. Theories of Theories of Mind. Cambridge University Press.
Carston, R. 1988. ‘Implicature, explicature and truth-theoretic semantics’. In R. Kempson (ed.) Mental Representations: The Interface between Language and Reality, pp. 155–81. Cambridge University Press.
Carston, R. 1990. ‘Quantity maxims and generalised implicature’. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 2: 1–31. Reprinted in Lingua 96: 213–44.
Carston, R. 1997. ‘Enrichment and loosening: complementary processes in deriving the proposition expressed?’. Linguistische Berichte 8, Special Issue on Pragmatics: 103–27.
Carston, R. 1998. ‘Informativeness, relevance and scalar implicature’. In R. Carston and S. Uchida (eds.) Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications, pp. 179–236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Carston, R. 1999. ‘The semantics/pragmatics distinction: A view from Relevance Theory’. In K. Turner (ed.) The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View (CRiSPI 1), pp. 85–125. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
Carston, R. 2002. Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.
Carston, R. 2004a. ‘Relevance theory and the saying-implicating distinction’. In L. Horn and G. Ward (eds.) The Handbook of Pragmatics, pp. 633–56. Oxford: Blackwell.
Carston, R. 2004b. ‘Truth-conditional content and conversational implicature’. In C. Bianchi (ed.) The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction, pp. 65–100. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Carston, R. 2007. ‘How many pragmatic systems are there?’. In M. J. Frápolli (ed.) Saying, Meaning and Referring: Essays on François Recanati's Philosophy of Language, pp. 18–48. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Carston, R. 2008. ‘Linguistic communication and the semantics-pragmatics distinction’. Synthese 165: 321–45.
Carston, R. 2009. ‘The explicit/implicit distinction in pragmatics and the limits of explicit communication’. International Review of Pragmatics 1: 35–62.
Carston, R. 2010a. ‘Explicit communication and “free” pragmatic enrichment’, in B. Soria and E. Romero (eds.), Explicit Communication: Robyn Carston's Pragmatics, pp. 217–87. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Carston, R. 2010b. ‘Metaphor: ad hoc concepts, literal meaning and mental images’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 110 (3): 297–323.
Carston, R. and Powell, G. 2006. ‘Relevance theory – new directions and developments’. In E. Lepore and B. Smith (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language, pp. 341–60. Oxford University Press.
Carston, R. and Wearing, C. 2011. ‘Metaphor, hyperbole and simile: A pragmatic approach’. Language and Cognition 3(2): 283--312.
Celle, A. and Huart, R. (eds.) 2007. Connectives as Discourse Landmarks. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Chafe, W. 1976. ‘Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view’. In C. N. Li (ed.) Subject and Topic, pp. 25–55. New York: Academic Press.
Chafe, W. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Consciousness Experience in Speaking and Writing. University of Chicago Press.
Chalmers, D. 1996. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford University Press.
Chalmers, D. 2002. ‘On Sense and Intension’. Philosophical Perspectives 16: 135–82.
Chalmers, D. 2006. ‘Foundations of Two-Dimensional Semantics’. In M. Garcia-Carpintero and J. Macia (eds.) Two-Dimensional Semantics: Foundations and Applications, pp. 55–140. Oxford University Press.
Chalmers, D. (forthcoming a). ‘The Nature of Epistemic Space’. In A. Egan and B. Weatherson (eds.) Epistemic Modality. Oxford University Press.
Chalmers, D. (forthcoming b). ‘Propositions and Attitude Ascriptions’. Noûs.
Chalmers, D. and Jackson, F. 2001. ‘Conceptual analysis and reductive explanation’. Philosophical Review 110: 315–60.
Chao, Y. R. 1968. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Chapman, S. 2005. Paul Grice: Philosopher and Linguist. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chen, G. 2002. ‘The grammaticalization of concessive markers in Early Modern English’. In O. Fischer, A. Rosenbach and D. Stein (eds.), Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English, pp. 85–110. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
CheneyD. and Seyfarth, R. 1990. How Monkeys See the World: Inside the Mind of Another Species. Chicago University Press.
Chierchia, G. 2004. ‘Scalar implicatures, polarity phenomena, and the syntax/ pragmatics interface’. In A. Belletti (ed.) Structures and Beyond, pp. 39–103. New York: Oxford University Press.
Chierchia, G. 2006. ‘Broaden your views: implicatures of domain widening and the “logicality” of language’. Linguistic Inquiry 37: 535–90.
Chierchia, G., Crain, S., Guasti, M. T., Gualmini, A. and Meroni, L. 2001. ‘The acquisition of disjunction: evidence for a grammatical view of scalar implicatures’. In Proceedings of the 25th Boston University Conference on Language Development, pp. 157–68. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Chierchia, G., Fox, D. and Spector, B. (forthcoming). ‘The grammatical view of scalar implicatures and the relationship between semantics and pragmatics’. In C. Maienbornet al. (eds.) Handbook of Semantics: An International Handbook. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Chilton, P. 2007. ‘Geometrical concepts at the interface of formal and cognitive models: Aktionsart, aspect, and the English progressive’. Pragmatics and Cognition 15: 91–114.
Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. 1971. ‘Deep structure, surface structure and semantic interpretation’. In D. Steinberg and L. Jakobovits (eds.) Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Linguistics, Philosophy and Psychology, pp. 183–216. Cambridge University Press.
Chomsky, N. 1975. ‘Quine's empirical assumptions’. In D. Davidson, and J. Hintikka (eds.) Words and Objections, pp. 53–68. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Chomsky, N. 1977. Essays on Form and Interpretation. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Chomsky, N. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York: Praeger.
Chomsky, N. 1996. ‘Language and thought: Some reflections on venerable themes’. In N. Chomsky, Powers and Prospects: Reflections on Human Nature and the Social Order, pp. 1–30. Boston: South End Press.
Chomsky, N. 2000. New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge University Press.
Ciaramidaro, A., Adenzato, M., Enrici, I., Erk, S., Pia, L., Bara, B. and Walter, H. 2007. ‘The intentional network: how the brain reads varieties of intentions’. Neuropsychologia 45: 3105–13.
Clapp, L. 1995. ‘How to be direct and innocent: a criticism of Crimmins and Perry's theory of attitude ascriptions’. Linguistics and Philosophy 18: 685–711.
Clapp, L. 2009. ‘The problem of negative existentials does not exist: a case of dynamic semantics’. Journal of Pragmatics 41: 1422–34.
Clark, B. 1993. ‘Relevance and “pseudo-imperatives”’. Linguistics and Philosophy 16: 79–121.
Clark, B. 2007. “‘Blazing a trail”: Moving from natural to linguistic meaning in accounting for the tones of English’. In R. A. Nilsen, N. A. Appiah Amfo and K. Borthen (eds.) Interpreting Utterances: Pragmatics and its Interfaces; Essays in Honour of Thorstein Fretheim, pp. 69–81. Oslo: Novus.
Clark, B. and Lindsey, G. 1990. ‘Intonation, grammar and utterance interpret-ation’. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 2: 32–51.
Clark, H. 1979. ‘Responding to indirect speech acts.’ Cognitive Psychology 11: 430–77.
Clark, H. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge University Press.
Clark, H. 1997. ‘Dogmas of understanding’. Discourse Processes 23: 567–98.
Clark, H. and Gerrig, R. 1984. ‘On the pretense theory of irony’. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113: 121–6. Reprinted in R. Gibbs and H. Colston (eds.) 2007, Irony in Language and Thought: A Cognitive Science Reader, pp. 25–33. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Clift, R., Drew, P. and Hutchby, I. 2006. ‘Conversation analysis’. In J. Verschueren and J. O. Östman (eds.) Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins (loose-leaf publication).
Clyne, M., Ball, M. and Neil, D. 1991. ‘Intercultural communication at work in Australia. Complaints and apologies in turns’. Multilingua. 10: 251–73.
Cohen, A. 1999. ‘How are alternatives computed?’ Journal of Semantics 16: 43–65.
Collins, J. 2009. ‘II—Methodology, not Metaphysics: Against Semantic Externalism’. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 83: 53–69.
Colston, H. L. and Gibbs, R. W. 2002. ‘Are irony and metaphor understood differently?’. Metaphor and Symbol 17: 57–60.
Comrie, B. 1981. ‘On Reichenbach's approach to tense’. CLS 17: 24–30.
Comrie, B. 1994. ‘Language universals and linguistic typology: Data-bases and explanations’. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 46: 3–14.
Copestake, A. and Lascarides, A. 1997. ‘Integrating symbolic and statistical representations: the lexicon pragmatics interface’. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL97), Madrid, 7–12 July 1997, pp. 136–43. Madrid: ACL.
Corbett, E. P. J. 1990. Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student. 3rd edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cornish, F. 2004. ‘Focus of attention in discourse’. In L. J. Mackenzie and M. Gómez- González (eds.) A New Architecture for Functional Grammar, pp. 117–50. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Corrigan, R., Moravcsik, E. A., Ouali, H. and Wheatley, K. M. (eds.) 2009. Formulaic Language. 2 vols. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Couper-Kuhlen, E. 1986. English Prosody. London: Edward Arnold.
Crain, S. 2008. ‘The interpretation of disjunction in universal grammar’. Language and Speech 51/1–2: 151–69.
Crimmins, M. 1992. Talk About Beliefs. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Crimmins, M. and Perry, J. 1989. ‘The prince and the phone booth: Reporting puzzling beliefs’. Journal of Philosophy 86: 685–711.
Croft, W. 2000. Explaining Language Change. Harlow, Essex: Longman, Pearson Education.
Croft, W. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford University Press.
Croft, W. and Cruse, D. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
Cruse, A. 2000. Meaning in Language. An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Cruttenden, A. 1986. Intonation. Cambridge University Press.
Crystal, D. 2001. Language and the Internet. Cambridge University Press.
Crystal, D. 2008. Txtng: The Gr8 Db8. Oxford University Press.
Culpeper, J. 1996. ‘Towards an anatomy of impoliteness’. Journal of Pragmatics 25: 349–67.
Culpeper, J. 2011a. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge University Press.
Culpeper, J. 2011b. ‘Conventionalized impoliteness’. Journal of Pragmatics 42: 3232–45.
Culpeper, J. and Kytö, M. 2010. Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Studies in English Language. Cambridge University Press.
Cummings, L. 1998. ‘The scientific reductionism of relevance theory: the lesson from logical positivism’. Journal of Pragmatics 29: 1–12.
Cummings, L. 2005. Pragmatics: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Edinburgh University Press.
Cummings, L. (ed.) 2010. The Pragmatics Encyclopedia. London: Routledge.
Currie, G. 2006. ‘Why irony is pretence’. In S. Nichols (ed.) The Architecture of the Imagination, pp. 111–33. Oxford University Press.
Cuyckens, H., Dirven, R. and Taylor, J. R. (eds.) 2003. Cognitive Approaches to Lexical Semantics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dalrymple, M. 2001. Lexical Functional Grammar. Dordrecht: Elsevier.
Dalrymple, M., Shieber, S. and Perreira, F. 1991. ‘Ellipsis and higher order unification’. Linguistics and Philosophy 14: 399–452.
Damourette, J. and Pichon, E. 1911–1936. Des mots à la pensée: Essai de grammaire de la langue française. Paris: D’Artrey, V.
Dancy, J. 2004. Ethics Without Principles. Oxford University Press.
Daneš, F. (ed.) 1974. Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective. The Hague: Mouton.
Dascal, M. and Gross, A. G. 1999. ‘The marriage of pragmatics and rhetoric’. Philosophy and Rhetoric 32: 107–30.
Davidse, K., Vandelanotte, L. and Cuyckens, H. (eds.) 2010. Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Davidson, D. 1968. ‘On saying that’. Synthese 19: 130–46. Reprinted in P. Ludlow (ed.) 1997, Readings in the Philosophy of Language, pp. 817–31. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Davidson, D. 1978. ‘What metaphors mean’. Critical Inquiry 5: 31–47. Reprinted in D. Davidson 1984, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, pp. 245–64. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Davidson, D. 1979. ‘Moods and Performances’. In A. Margalit (ed.) Meaning and use, pp. 9–20. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Davidson, D. 1984. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Davidson, D. 1986. ‘A nice derangement of epitaphs’. In R. Grandy and R. Warner (eds.) Philosophical Grounds of Rationality, pp. 157–74. Oxford University Press.
Davies, M. and Stone, T. (eds.) 1995a. Mental Simulation: Philosophical and Psychological Essays. Oxford: Blackwell.
Davies, M. and Stone, T. (eds.) 1995b. Folk Psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Davis, W. 1998. Implicature: Intention, Convention, and Principle in the Failure of Gricean Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Davis, W. 2003. Meaning, Expression, and Thought. Cambridge University Press.
Davis, W. 2008. ‘Expressing, meaning, showing, and intending to indicate’. Intercultural Pragmatics 5: 111–29.
Dekker, P. 1992. ‘An update semantics for dynamic predicate logic’. In P. Dekker and M. Stokhof (eds.) Proceedings of the Eighth Amsterdam Colloquium. ILLC, University of Amsterdam.
Demeure, V., Bonnefon, J.-F. and Raufaste, E. 2009. ‘Politeness and conditional reasoning: Interpersonal cues to the indirect suppression of deductive inferences’. Journal of Experimental Psychology 35: 260–66.
Deutschmann, M. 2003. Apologising in British English. Skrifter från moderna språk 10. Umeå: Institutionen för moderna språk, Umeå University.
Devitt, M. 1996. Coming to Our Senses: A Naturalistic Program for Semantic Localism. Cambridge University Press.
Dews, S. and Winner, E. 1995. ‘Muting the meaning: a social function of irony’. Metaphor and symbolic activity 10: 3–19.
Dews, S. and Winner, E. 1997. ‘Attributing meaning to deliberately false utterances: the case of irony’. In C. Mandell and A. McCabe (eds.) The Problem of Meaning: Behavioral and Cognitive Perspectives, pp. 377–414. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Dews, S. and Winner, E. 1999. ‘Obligatory processing of the literal and the nonliteral meanings of ironic utterances’. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 1579–99.
Dews, S., Kaplan, J. and Winner, E. 1995. ‘Why not say it directly? The social functions of irony’. Discourse Processes 19: 347–67.
Di Sciullo, A.-M. and Williams, E. 1987. On the Definition of Word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Diewald, G. 2002. ‘A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization’. In I. Wischer and G. Diewald (eds.) New Reflections on Grammaticalization, pp. 103–20. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Dijk, T. van. 1981. Studies in the Pragmatics of Discourse. The Hague: Mouton.
van Dijk, T. 2008. Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge University Press.
Dik, S. 1968. Coordination: Its Implication for the Theory of General Linguistics. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.
Dominicy, M. and Franken, N. 2002. ‘Speech acts and relevance theory’. In D. Vanderveken and S. Kubo (eds.) Essays in Speech Act Theory, pp. 263–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Donahue, D. 1991. Lawman's Brut, An Early Arthurian Poem: A Study of Middle English Formulaic Composition. Lewiston, NY: Mellen.
Donnellan, K. 1966. ‘Reference and definite descriptions’. Philosophical Review 75: 281–304.
Donnellan, K. 1972. ‘Proper names and identifying descriptions’. Synthese 21: 335–58.
Donohue, M. 1993. A Grammar of Tukang Besi. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Downing, A. 2001. ‘“Surely you knew!” Surely as a marker of evidentiality and stance’. Functions of Language 8: 253–85.
Dowty, D. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Dowty, D. 1986. ‘The effects of aspectual class on the temporal structure of discourse: Semantics or pragmatics?’. Linguistics and Philosophy 9: 37–61.
Doyle, J. 1951. ‘In defense of the square of opposition’. The New Scholasticism 25: 367–96.
Du Bois, J. W. 1985. ‘Competing motivations’. In J. Haiman (ed.) Iconicity in Syntax, pp. 343–65. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Du Bois, J.W. 1987. ‘The discourse basis of ergativity’. Language 63: 805–55.
Du Bois, J.W. 1998. ‘Dialogic syntax’. Paper presented at the Cognitive Theories of Intertextuality Meeting, Tel Aviv University.
Du Bois, J.W. 2001 ‘Towards a dialogic syntax’. Unpublished ms. University of California Santa Barbara.
Du Bois, J.W. 2003. ‘Discourse and grammar’. In M. Tomasello (ed.) The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, vol. 2, pp. 47–87. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Du Bois, J. W., Chafe, W. L., Meyer, C. and Thompson, S. A. 2000. Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part 1. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
Du Bois, J. W., Chafe, W. L., Meyer, C., Thompson, S. A. and Martey, N. 2003. Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part 2. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
Ducrot, O. 1972. Dire et Ne Pas Dire. Paris: Hermann.
Ducrot, O. 1984. Le Dire et le Dit. Paris: Minuit.
Dummett, M. 1973. Frege: Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Duckworth.
Dunn, J. M. 1996. ‘Generalized ortho negation’. In H. Wansing (ed.) Negation: A Notion in Focus, pp. 3–26. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Duranti, A. 1999. ‘Intentionality’. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 9: 134–6.
Durkheim, É. 1915. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. London: George Allen and Unwin. (Translated from É. Durkheim, 1912, Les Formes Élémentaires de la Vie Réligieuse. Paris: Alcan.)
Eckardt, R. 2006. Meaning Change in Grammaticalization: An Enquiry into Semantic Reanalysis. Oxford University Press.
Economist 2009. ‘Politeness: Hi there’. Economist 393 (19 December 2009): 104–6.
Edwards, D. 2006. ‘Discourse, cognition and social practices: the rich surface of language and social interaction’. Discourse Studies 8: 41–9.
Edwards, D. 2008. ‘Intentionality and mens rea in police interrogations: the production of actions as crimes’. Intercultural Pragmatics 5: 177–99.
Eelen, G. 2001. A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome.
Ekman, P. 1989. ‘The argument and evidence about universals in facial expressions of emotion’. In H. Wagner and A. Manstead (eds.) Handbook of Social Psychophysiology, pp. 143–64. New York: Wiley.
Ekman, P. 1992. ‘An argument for basic emotion’. Cognition and Emotion 6 (3/4): 169–200.
Ekman, P. 1999. ‘Emotional and conversational nonverbal signals’. In L. Messing and R. Campbell (eds.) Gesture, Speech and Sign, pp. 45–57. Oxford University Press.
Elliot, J. R. 2000. ‘Realis and irrealis: forms and concepts of the grammaticalisation of reality’. Linguistic Typology 4–1: 55–90.
Enç, M. 1981. Tense without Scope: An Analysis of Nouns as Indexicals. PhD thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Enç, M. 1996. ‘Tense and modality’. In S. Lappin (ed.) The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, pp. 345–58. Oxford: Blackwell.
Enfield, N. J. 2003. Linguistic Epidemiology: Semantics and Grammar of Language Contact in Mainland Southeast Asia. London: Routledge Curzon.
Enfield, N. J. and Stivers, T. 2007. Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
Englebretsen, G. 1981. Logical Negation. Assen: van Gorcum.
Enrici, I., Adenzato, M., Cappa, S., Bara, B. and Tettamanti, M. 2011. ‘Intention processing in communication: a common brain network for language and gestures’. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23: 2415–31.
Erman, B. and Kostinas, U. B. 1993. ‘Pragmaticalization: the case of ba and you know’. Studier i Modern Sprakvetenskap 10: 76–93.
Erman, B. and Warren, B. 2000. ‘The idiom principle and the open choice principle’. Text 20: 29–62.
Erteschik-Shir, N. 1997. The Dynamics of Focus Structure. Cambridge University Press.
Escandell-Vidal, V. 1996. ‘Towards a cognitive approach to politeness’. Language Sciences 18: 629–50.
Escandell-Vidal, V. 1998. ‘Intonation and procedural encoding: the case of Spanish interrogatives’. In V. Rouchota and A. Jucker (eds.) Current Issues in Relevance Theory, pp. 169–203. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Escandell-Vidal, V. 2002. ‘Echo-syntax and metarepresentations’. Lingua 112: 871–900.
Evans, N. and Levinson, S. C. 2009. ‘The myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance for cognitive science’. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32: 429–92.
Evans, N. and Wilkins, D. 2000. ‘In the mind's ear: the semantic extensions of perception verbs in Australian languages’. Language 76: 546–92.
Everett, D. and Kern, B. 1997. Warì: Descriptive Grammars. London: Routledge.
Fairclough, N. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
Faltz, L. M. 1985. Reflexivization: A Study in Universal Syntax. New York: Garland.
Ferreira, F. 2005. ‘Psycholinguistics, formal grammars, and cognitive science’. The Linguistic Review 22: 365–80.
Ferreira, V. 1996. ‘Is it better to give than to donate? Syntactic flexibility in language production’. Journal of Memory and Language 35: 724–55.
Fetzer, A. 2002. ‘Communicative intentions in context’. In A. Fetzer and C. Meierkord (eds.) Rethinking Sequentiality: Linguistics meets Conversational Interaction, pp. 37–69. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Fetzer, A. 2004. Recontextualizing Context: Grammaticality Meets Appropriateness. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Fetzer, A. 2007. ‘Reformulation and common grounds’. In A. Fetzer and K. Fischer (eds.) Lexical Markers of Common Grounds, pp. 157–79. London: Elsevier.
Fetzer, A. 2008. ‘Theme zones in English media discourse. Forms and functions’. Journal of Pragmatics 40: 1543–68.
Field, T., Woodson, R., Greenberg, R. and Cohen, D. 1982. ‘Discrimination and imitation of facial expressions by neonates’. Science 218: 179–81.
Fiengo, R. 2007. Asking Questions: Using Meaningful Structures to Imply Ignorance. Oxford University Press.
Fiengo, R. and May, R. 1994. Indices and Identity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Filipović, L. 2007a. ‘Language as a witness: insights from cognitive linguistics’. Speech, Language and the Law 14: 245–67.
Filipović, L. 2007b. Talking about Motion: A Crosslinguistic Investigation of Lexicalization Patterns. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Filipović, L. 2008. ‘Typology in action: applying insights from typological contrasts’. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 18: 42–61.
Fillmore, C. J. 1982. ‘Frame semantics’. In Linguistic Society of Korea (eds.) Linguistics in the Morning Calm, pp. 111–38. Seoul: Hanshin.
Fillmore, C.J. 2006. ‘Frame semantics’. In E. K. Brown (ed.) Encyclopedia of Languages and Linguistics, vol. iv, pp. 613–20. 2nd edition. Oxford: Elsevier.
Fillmore, C. J. and Atkins, B. T. 1992. ‘Towards a frame-based lexicon: the semantics of RISK and its neighbors’. In A. Lehrer and E. F. Kittay (eds.) Frames, Fields, and Contrasts, pp. 75–102. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Fintel, K. von. 1994. Restrictions on Quantifier Domains. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts.
Fintel, K. von 1995. ‘The formal semantics of grammaticalization’. In J. N. Beckman (ed.) Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society 25, vol. ii, pp. 175–89. Department of Linguistics, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Firbas, J. 1966. ‘On defining the theme in functional sentence analysis’. In F. Daneš (ed.) Travaux linguistiques de Prague, vol. i, pp. 267–80. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
Fitzpatrick, D. 2003. ‘Searle and collective intentionality’. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 62: 45–66.
Fodor, J. 1975. The Language of Thought. Scranton, PA: Crowell.
Fodor, J. 1981. Representations: Philosophical Essays on the Foundations of Cognitive Science. Brighton: Harvester Press.
Fodor, J. 1983. The Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fodor, J. 2008. The Language of Thought Revisited. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Fodor, J. and Sag, I. 1982. ‘Referential and quantificational indefinites’. Linguistics and Philosophy 5: 355–98.
Fogassi, L., Ferrari, P. F., Gesierich, B., Rozzi, S., Chersi, F. and Rizzolatti, G. 2005. ‘Parietal lobe: from action organization to intention understanding’. Science 308: 662–7.
Fogelin, R. 1967. Evidence and Meaning. New York: Humanities Press.
Forbes, G. 1990. ‘The indispensability of Sinn’. Philosophical Review 99: 535–63.
Forbes, G. 1997. ‘How much substitutivity?’ Analysis 57: 109–13.
Forbes, G. 2006. Attitude Problems: An Essay on Linguistic Intensionality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Fox, D. 2002. ‘Antecedent contained deletion and the copy theory of movement’. Linguistic Inquiry 33(1): 63–96.
Fraassen, B. van 1971. Formal Semantics and Logic. New York: Macmillan.
Frajzyngier, Z. and Shay, E. 2002. A Grammar of Hdi. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Fraser, B. 1990. ‘Perspectives on politeness’. Journal of Pragmatics 14: 219–36.
Fraser, B. and Nolen, W. 1981. ‘The association of deference with linguistic form’. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 27: 93–109.
Frege, G. 1879. ‘Begriffschrift’. In T. W. Bynum (trans. and ed.) ‘Conceptual Notation’ and Related Articles, pp. 101–203. Oxford University Press.
Frege, G. 1884. Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik, eine logisch-mathematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl. Introduction. Breslau: W. Koebner. Trans. M. Beaney in M. Beaney (ed.) 1997, The Frege Reader, pp. 84–91. Oxford: Blackwell.
Frege, G. 1892. ‘Über Sinn und Bedeutung’. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Philosophische Kritik 100: 25–50. Reprinted in Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, pp. 56–78, trans. Geach & Black. Blackwell Press, 1953. Translated as ‘On sense and reference’ in P. T. Geach (ed.) 1960. Reprinted in M. Beaney (ed.) 1997, The Frege Reader, pp. 151–71. Oxford: Blackwell.
Frege, G. 1893. Grundgesetze der Arithmetik, vol. i. Preface. Jena: H. Pohle. Trans. M. Beaney in M. Beaney (ed.) 1997, The Frege Reader, pp. 194–208. Oxford: Blackwell.
Frege, G. 1894. ‘Review of E.G. Husserl, Philosophie der Arithmetik I [Philosophy of Arithmetic I]’. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 103. Trans. H. Kaal in G. Frege 1984, Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy, pp. 195–209., ed. B. McGuinness. Oxford: Blackwell.
Frege, G. 1897. ‘Logic’. Unpublished paper, appearing in H. Hermeset al. (eds.) Nachgelassene Schriften, pp. 139–61. Hamburg: Felix Meinen. Extract trans. P. Long and R. White, reprinted in M. Beaney (ed.) 1997, The Frege Reader, pp. 227–50. Oxford: Blackwell.
Frege, G. 1906. ‘Letters to Husserl, 1906’. In G. Frege 1976, Wissenschaftlicher Briefwechsel. Hamburg: Felix Meiner. Trans. H. Kaal in G. Frege 1980, Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence, pp. 66–71, ed. by B. McGuinness. Oxford: Blackwell. Reprinted in M. Beaney (ed.) 1997, The Frege Reader, pp. 301–7. Oxford: Blackwell.
Frege, G. 1918. ‘Thought’. Trans. P. Geach and R. H. Stoothoff. In M. Beaney (ed.) 1997, The Frege Reader, pp. 325–45. Oxford: Blackwell.
Frege, G. 1970. Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege. Ed. and trans. P. Geach and M. Black. Oxford: Blackwell.
Fretheim, T. 1987. ‘Pragmatics and intonation’. In J. Verschueren and M. Bertuccelli-Papi (eds.) The Pragmatic Perspective, pp. 395–420. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fretheim, T. 1992a. Grammatically Underdetermined Theme-Rheme Articulation. ROLIG no. 49. Roskilde University Center, Denmark.
Fretheim, T. 1992b. ‘Themehood, rhemehood and Norwegian focus structure’. Folia Linguistica 26(1–2): 111–50.
Fretheim, T. 2001. ‘The interaction of right-dislocated pronominals and intonational phrasing in Norwegian’. In W. van Dommelen and T. Fretheim (eds.) Nordic Prosody: Proceedings of the VIIIth Conference. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Fretheim, T. 2002. ‘Intonation as a constraint on inferential processing’. In B. Bel and I. Marlien (eds.) Proceedings of the Speech Prosody 2002 Conference, pp. 59–64. Denver, CO.
Fridlund, A. 1994. Human Facial Expression: An Evolutionary View. San Diego: Academic Press.
Frith, C. D. and Frith, U. 2003. ‘The neural basis of mentalizing’. Neuron 50: 531–4.
Gabbay, D. 1988. ‘What is negation in a system?’. In F. R. Drake and J. K. Truss (eds.) Logic Colloquium ’86, pp. 95–112. University of Amsterdam.
Gabelenz, G. von der 1868. ‘Ideen zur einer vergleichenden Syntax: Wort-und Satzstellung’. Zeitschrift für Völkerpsychologie und Sprachwissenschaft 6: 376–84.
Garcia, A. C. and Jacobs, J. B. 1999. ‘The eyes of the beholder: understanding the turn-taking system in quasi-synchronous computer-mediated communication’. Research on Language and Social Interaction 32: 337–67.
Garcia-Carpintero, M. 2006. ‘Recanati on the semantics/pragmatics distinction’. Critica 38: 35–68.
Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Garfinkel, H. and Sacks, H. 1970. ‘On formal structures of practical action’. In J. C. McKinney and E. A. Tiraykian (eds.) Theoretical Sociology, pp. 338–66. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Gauker, C. 2001. ‘Situated inference versus conversational implicature’. Nous 35: 163–89.
Gauker, C. 2003. Words Without Meaning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gauker, C. 2007. ‘The circle of deference proves the normativity semantics’. Rivista di Estetica 47: 181–98.
Gauker, C. 2008. ‘Zero tolerance for pragmatics’. Synthese 165: 359–73.
Gazdar, G. 1979. Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition and Logical Form. New York: Academic Press.
Gazzaniga, M. and Smiley, C. 1991. ‘Hemispheric mechanisms controlling voluntary and spontaneous facial expressions’. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2: 239–45.
Geach, P. 1962. Reference and Generality. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Gee, J. P. 1999. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.
Geeraerts, D. 1987. Diachronic Prototype Semantics: A Contribution to Historical Lexicology. Oxford: Clarendon.
Geis, M. L. and Zwicky, A. 1971. ‘On invited inferences’. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 561–6.
Georgakopoulou, A. 2005. ‘Computer-mediated communication’. In J. Verschueren, J. O. Östman, J. Blommaert and C. Bulcaen (eds.) Handbook of Pragmatics Online. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Georgiou, I. 2003. ‘The idea of emergent property’. Journal of the Operational Research Society 54: 239–47.
Gernsbacher, M. A. and Givón, T. (eds.) 1995. Coherence in Spontaneous Text. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Geurts, B. 1995. Presupposing. Doctoral dissertation, University of Stuttgart.
Geurts, B. 1996. ‘Local satisfaction guaranteed: a presupposition theory and its problems’. Linguistics and Philosophy 19: 259–94.
Geurts, B. 1999. Presuppositions and Pronouns (CRISPI 3). Oxford: Elsevier.
Geurts, B. 2005. ‘Entertaining alternatives: disjunctions as modals’. Natural Language Semantics 13(4): 383–410.
Geurts, B. 2009. ‘Scalar implicature and local pragmatics’. Mind and Language 24: 51–79.
Geurts, B. 2010. Quantity Implicatures. Cambridge University Press.
Geurts, B. and Pouscoulous, N. 2009a. ‘No scalar inferences under embedding’. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics. In P. Egré and G. Magri (eds.), Presuppositions and Implicatures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Geurts, B. and Pouscoulous, N. 2009b. ‘Embedded implicatures?!?’. Semantics and Pragmatics 2(4): 1–34.
Geurts, B. and van der Sandt, R. 1999. ‘Domain restriction’. In P. Bosch and R. van der Sandt (eds.) Focus: Linguistic, Cognitive, and Computational Perspectives, pp. 268–92. Cambridge University Press.
Geurts, B. and Van Der Sandt, R. 2004. ‘Interpreting focus’. Theoretical Linguistics 30: 1–44.
Giacalone, A. and Mauri, C. (forthcoming). ‘The grammaticalization of coordinating interclausal connectives’. In H. Narrog and B. Heine (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization. Oxford University Press.
Gibbs, R. 1979. ‘Contextual effects in understanding indirect requests’. Discourse Processes 2: 1–10.
Gibbs, R. 1980. ‘Spilling the beans on understanding and memory for idioms in conversation’. Memory & Cognition 8: 449–56.
Gibbs, R. 1986. ‘On the psycholinguistics of sarcasm’. Journal of Experimental Psychology (General) 115: 3–15.
Gibbs, R. 1994. The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, R. 1999. Intentions in the Experience of Meaning. Cambridge Unversity Press.
Gibbs, R. 2001. ‘Intentions as emergent products of social interactions’. In B. Malle, L. Moses and D. Baldwin (eds.) Intentions and Intentionality, pp. 105–22. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gibbs, R. 2002. ‘A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and implicated’. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 457–86.
Gibbs, R. and Moise, J. F. 1997. ‘Pragmatics in understanding what is said’. Cognition 62: 51–74.
Gibbs, R. and Tendahl, M. 2006. ‘Cognitive effort and effects in metaphor comprehension: Relevance Theory and psycholinguistics’. Mind and Language 21: 379–403.
Gigerenzer, G. 2000. Adaptive Thinking: Rationality in the Real World. Oxford University Press.
Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. and the ABC Research Group 1999. Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart. Oxford University Press.
Gil, D. 1991. ‘Aristotle goes to Arizona and finds a language without AND’. In D. Zaefferer (ed.) Semantic Universals and Universal Semantics, pp. 96–130. Berlin: Foris.
Gilbert, M. 2009. ‘Shared intention and personal intentions’. Philosophical Studies 114: 167–87.
Ginzburg, J. and Cooper, R. 2004. ‘Clarification, ellipsis, and the nature of contextual updates in dialogue’. Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 297–365.
Giora, R. 1995. ‘On irony and negation’. Discourse Processes 19: 239–64.
Giora, R. 1997. ‘Understanding figurative and literal language: the graded salience hypothesis’. Cognitive Linguistics 8: 183–206.
Giora, R. 1999. ‘On the priority of salient meanings: studies of literal and figurative language’. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 919–29.
Giora, R. 2003. On Our Mind: Salience, Context, and Figurative Language. New York: Oxford University Press.
Giora, R. 2006. ‘Anything negatives can do affirmatives can do just as well, except for some metaphors’. Journal of Pragmatics 38: 981–1014.
Giora, R. 2007. ‘A good Arab is not a dead Arab – a racist incitement: on the accessibility of negated concepts’. In L. R. Horn and I. Kecskes (eds.) Explorations in Pragmatics: Linguistic, Cognitive and Intercultural Aspects, pp. 129–62. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Giora, R. 2011. ‘Will anticipating irony facilitate it immediately?’ In M. Dynel (ed.) The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains, pp. 19–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Giora, R. and Fein, O. 1999a. ‘On understanding familiar and less-familiar figurative language’. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 1601–18.
Giora, R. and Fein, O. 1999b. ‘Irony: context and salience’. Metaphor and Symbol 14: 241–57.
Giora, R., Zaidel, E., Soroker, N., Batori, G. and Kasher, A. 2000. ‘Differential effects of right- and left-hemisphere damage on understanding sarcasm and metaphor’. Metaphor and Symbol 15: 63–83.
Giora, R., Fein, O., Kronrod, A., Elnatan, I., Shuval, N. and Zur, A. 2004. ‘Weapons of mass distraction: optimal innovation and pleasure ratings’. Metaphor and Symbol 19: 115–41.
Giora, R., Balaban, N., Fein, O. and Alkabets, I. 2005a. ‘Negation as positivity in disguise’. In H. L. Colston and A. Katz (eds.) Figurative Language Comprehension: Social and Cultural Influences, pp. 233–58. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Giora, R., Fein, O., Ganzi, J., Alkeslassy Levi, N., and Sabah, H. 2005b. ‘On negation as mitigation: The case of irony’. Discourse Processes 39: 81–100.
Giora, R., Fein, O., Aschkenazi, K. and Alkabets-Zlozover, I. 2007a. ‘Negation in context: a functional approach to suppression’. Discourse Processes 43: 153–72.
Giora, R., Fein, O., Laadan, D., Wolfson, J., Zeituny, M., Kidron, R., Kaufman, R. and Shaham, R. 2007b. ‘Expecting irony: context vs. salience-based effects’. Metaphor and Symbol 22: 119–46.
Giora, R., Fein, O., Kaufman, R., Eisenberg, D. and Erez, S. 2009. ‘Does an “ironic situation” favor an ironic interpretation?’. In G. Brône and J. Vandaele (eds.) Cognitive poetics: Goals, Gains and Gaps (Applications of Cognitive Linguistics series), pp. 383–99. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Giora, R., Fein, O., Metuki, N. and Stern, P. 2010. ‘Negation as a metaphor-inducing operator’. In L. R. Horn (ed.) The Expression of Negation, pp. 225–56. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Giora, R., Gazal, O., Goldstein, I., Fein, O. and Stringaris, A. (forthcoming). ‘Salience and context: interpreting metaphors and literals by young adults diagnosed with Asperger's syndrome’. Metaphor and Symbol.
Giora, R., Livnat, E., and Fein, O. 2011a. ‘On default nonliteral interpretation’. Unpublished ms.
Giora, R., Fein, O. and Yeari, M. 2011b. ‘Interpreting irony: Will expecting it make a difference?’ Unpublished ms.
Givón, T. 1979. On Understanding Grammar. Perspectives in Neurolinguistics and Psycholinguistics. New York: Academic Press.
Givón, T. 1989. Mind, Code and Context. Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum.
Givón, T. 1993. English Grammar: A Function-Based Introduction. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Givón, T. 2005. Context as Other Minds. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Glenn, P. 2003. Laughter in Interaction. Cambridge University Press.
Glock, H.-J. (2010). ‘Does language require conventions?’. In P. Frascolla, D. Marconi and A. Voltolini (eds.) Wittgenstein: Mind, Meaning and Metaphilosophy, pp. 85--112. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Glucksberg, S. (ed.) 2001. Understanding Figurative Language: From Metaphors to Idioms. Oxford University Press.
Glucksberg, S. 2008. ‘How metaphors create categories – quickly’. In R. Gibbs (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, pp. 67–83. Cambridge University Press.
Glucksberg, S. and Haught, C. 2006. ‘On the relation between metaphor and simile: when comparison fails’. Mind and Language 21: 360–78.
Glucksberg, S. and Keysar, B. 1993. ‘How metaphors work’. In A. Ortony (ed.) Metaphors and Thought, pp. 401–24. Cambridge University Press.
Goddard, C. and Wierzbicka, A. 1997. ‘Discourse and culture’. In T. A. van Dijk (ed.) Discourse as Social Interaction, pp. 23–57. London: Sage.
Goffman, E. 1955. ‘On face-work: an analysis of ritual elements of social interaction’. Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes 18: 213–31.
Goffman, E. 1964. ‘The neglected situation’. American Anthropologist 66(6/2): 133–6.
Goffman, E. 1974. Frame Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Goffman, E. 1979. ‘Footing’. Semiotica 25: 1–29.
Goffman, E. 1986. Frame Analysis. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Goldberg, A. E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, A. E. 2006. Constructions at Work. Oxford University Press.
Goldman, K. A. 1990. Formulaic Analysis of Serbo-Croation Oral Epic Songs: Songs of Avdo Avdic. New York: Garland.
Gómez-González, M. A. 2001. The Theme-Topic Interface: Evidence from English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
González-Cruz, A. I. 2007. ‘On the subjectification of adverbial clause connectives: semantic and pragmatic considerations in the development of while-clauses’. In U. Lenker and A. Meurman-Solin (eds.) Connectives in the History of English, pp. 145–66. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Good, D. 1995. ‘Where does foresight end and hindsight begin?’. In E. Goody (ed.) Social Intelligence and Interaction, pp. 139–49. Cambridge University Press.
Goodman, N. 1964. ‘A world of individuals’. In H. Putnam and P. Benacerraf (eds.) Philosophy of Mathematics: Selected Readings, pp. 197–210. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Goodman, N. 1989. ‘“Just the Facts, Ma'am!”’. In M. Krausz (ed.) Relativism: Interpretation and Confrontation, pp. 80–85. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Goodwin, C. 1981. Conversational Organisation: Interaction Between Speakers and Hearers. New York: Academic Press.
Goodwin, C. and Heritage, J. 1990. ‘Conversation analysis’. Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 283–307.
Goossens, L. 1999. ‘Metonymic bridges in modal shifts’. In K.-U. Panther and G. Radden (eds.) Metonymy in Language and Thought, pp. 193–210. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gordon, L. 1986. Maricopa Morphology and Syntax. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gosselin, L. 2005. Temporalité et Modalité. Brussels: De Boeck.
Grady, J. 1997. ‘Theories are buildings revisited’. Cognitive Linguistics 8: 267–90.
Grady, J., Oakley, T. and Coulson, S. 1999. ‘Blending and metaphor’. In G. Steen and R. Gibbs (eds.) Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics, pp. 101–24. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Green, G. M. 1975. ‘How to get people to do things with words’. In P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds.) Syntax and Semantics, 3: Speech Acts, pp. 107–41. New York: Academic Press.
Green, G. M. 1976. ‘Main clause phenomena in subordinate clauses’. Language 52: 382–97.
Green, G. M. 1989. Pragmatics and Natural Language Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Green, M. 1998. ‘Direct reference and implicature’. Philosophical Studies 91: 61–90.
Green, M. 2007. Self-expression. Oxford University Press.
Gregoromichelaki, E., Sato, Y., Kempson, R., Gargett, A. and Howes, C. 2009. ‘Dialogue modelling and the remit of core grammar’. In H. Bunt, V. Petukhova and S. Wubben (eds.) Proceedings of Eighth International Conference on Computational Semantics, IWCS-8, pp. 128–39. Tilburg University.
Grice, H. P. 1957. ‘Meaning’. Philosophical Review 66: 377–88. Reprinted in H. P. Grice 1989, Studies in the Way of Words, pp. 213–23. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Grice, H. P. 1961. ‘The causal theory of perception’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 35: 121–52.
Grice, H. P. 1967. ‘Logic and conversation’. William James Lectures, Harvard University. Printed in H. P. Grice, Studies in the Way of Words, pp. 1–143. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Grice, H. P. 1968. ‘Utterer's meaning, sentence meaning and word-meaning’. Foundations of Language 4: 225–42.
Grice, H. P. 1969. ‘Utterer's meaning and intentions’. Philosophical Review 78: 147–77. Reprinted in H. P. Grice, Studies in the Way of Words, pp. 86–116. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Grice, H. P. 1975. ‘Logic and conversation’. In P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, pp. 41–58. Reprinted in H. P. Grice, Studies in the Way of Words, pp. 22–40. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Grice, H. P. 1978. ‘Further notes on logic and conversation’. In P. Cole (ed.) Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics, pp. 113–27. New York: Academic Press. Reprinted in H. P. Grice, Studies in the Way of Words, pp. 41–57. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Grice, H. P. 1981. ‘Presupposition and implicature’. In P. Cole (ed.) Radical Pragmatics, pp. 183–99. New York: Academic Press.
Grice, H. P. 1982. ‘Meaning revisited’. In N. Smith (ed.) Mutual Knowledge, pp. 232–43. London: Academic Press.
Grice, H. P. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Grice, H. P. 2001. Aspects of Reason. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Groefsema, M. 1995. ‘Can, may, must, and should: a relevance theoretic account’. Journal of Linguistics 31: 53–97.
Groenendijk, J. 2009. ‘Inquisitive semantics: two possibilities for disjunction’. In P. Bosch, D. Gabelaia and J. Lang (eds.) Seventh International Tbilisi Symposium on Language, Logic, and Computation, pp. 80–94. Berlin: Springer.
Groenendijk, J. and Stokhof, M. 1984. Studies in the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers. University of Amsterdam, PhD thesis.
Groenendijk, J. and Stokhof, M. 1991. ‘Dynamic predicate logic’. Linguistics and Philosophy 14: 39–100.
Grondelaers, S., Speelman, D. and Geeraerts, D. 2007. ‘Lexical variation and change’. In D. Geeraerts and H. Cuyckens (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, pp. 988–1011. Oxford University Press.
Grosz, B. and Ziv, Y. 1998. ‘Centering, global focus, and right dislocation’. In M. Walker, A. Joshi and E. Prince (eds.) Centering Theory in Discourse, pp. 293–307. Oxford University Press.
Grundy, P. 2008. Doing Pragmatics. 3rd edition. London: Hodder.
Guasti, M. T., Chierchia, G., Crain, S., Foppolo, F., Gualmini, A. and Meroni, L. 2005. ‘Why children and adults sometimes (but not always) compute implicatures’. Language and Cognitive Processes 20: 667–96.
Gudykunst, W. B. and Mody, B. 2002. Handbook of International and Intercultural Communication, pp. 259–75. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Guillaume, A. 2004. A Grammar of Cavineña, an Amazonian Language of Northern Bolivia. PhD Thesis, RCLT, La Trobe University.
Gumperz, J. 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge University Press.
Gumperz, J. 1992. ‘Contextualization and understanding’. In A. Duranti and C. Goodwin (eds.) Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, pp. 229–52. Cambridge University Press.
Gumperz, J. 1996. ‘The linguistic and cultural relativity of inference’. In J. Gumperz and S. C. Levinson (eds.) Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, pp. 374–406. Cambridge University Press.
Gundel, J. K. 1974. The Role of Topic and Comment in Linguistic Theory. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin. Distributed by Indiana University Linguistic Club, 1977. Also published by Garland, 1988.
Gundel, J. K. 1980. ‘Zero NP-anaphora in Russian: a case of topic-prominence’. In Proceedings from the 16th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Parasession on Anaphora, pp. 139–46. Chicago Linguistic Society.
Gundel, J. K. 1985. ‘Shared knowledge and topicality’. Journal of Pragmatics 9: 83–107.
Gundel, J. K. 1988. ‘Universals of topic-comment structure’. In M. Hammond, E. Moravczik and J. Wirth (eds.) Studies in Syntactic Typology, pp. 209–39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gundel, J. K. 1999a. ‘On different kinds of focus’. In P. Bosch and R. van der Sandt (eds.) Focus: Linguistic, Cognitive and Computational Perspectives, pp. 293–305. Cambridge University Press.
Gundel, J. K. 1999b. ‘Topic, focus and the grammar pragmatics interface’. In J. Alexander, N. Han and M. Minnick (eds.) Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium (Penn Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 6.1), pp. 185–200. Philadelphia, PA: Penn Linguistics Department.
Gundel, J. K. 2002. ‘It-clefts in English and Norwegian’. In B. Behrens, C. Fabricius Hansen, H. Hasselgard and S. Johansson (eds.) Information Structure in a Cross-Linguistic Perspective, pp. 113–28. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Gundel, J. K. 2005. ‘Clefts in English and Norwegian: implications for the grammar-pragmatics interface’. In V. Molnar and S. Winkler (eds.) The Architecture of Focus, pp. 517–48. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gundel, J. K. 2010. ‘Reference and accessibility from a Givenness Hierarchy perspective’. International Review of Pragmatics 2: 141--7.
Gundel, J. K. and Fretheim, T. 2002. ‘Information structure’. In J. Verschueren (ed.) Handbook of Pragmatics, pp. 1–17. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (Also published in F. Brisard, J.-O. Östman and J. Verschueren (eds.) Grammar, Meaning and Pragmatics, pp. 146–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.)
Gundel, J. K. and Fretheim, T. 2004. ‘Topic and Focus’. In L. Horn and G. Ward (eds.) The Handbook of Pragmatics, pp. 175–96. Oxford: Blackwell.
Gundel, J. K., Hedberg, N. and Zacharski, R. 1993. ‘Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse’. Language 69: 274–307.
Gundel, J. K., Hedberg, N. and Zacharski, R. (forthcoming). ‘Underspecification of cognitive status in reference production: some empirical predictions’. Topics in Cognitive Science, Special issue: Production of Referring Expressions.
Gussenhoven, C. 1984. On the Grammar and Semantics of Sentence Accents. Dordrecht: Foris.
Gussenhoven, C. 2002. ‘Intonation and interpretation: phonetics and phonology’. In Speech Prosody 2002: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Speech Prosody, pp. 47–57. Aix-en-Provence: ProSig and Université de Provence Laboratoire Parole et Language.
Gussenhoven, C. 2004. The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. Cambridge University Press.
Gussenhoven, C. 2006. ‘Semantics of prosody’. In K. Brown (ed.) Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd Edition, vol. xi, pp. 170–72. Oxford: Elsevier.
Gutzmann, D. 2008. On the Interaction Between Modal Particles and Sentence Mood in German. Mainz: German Institute, Johannes Gutenberg University.
Haack, S. and Lane, R. (eds.) 2006. Pragmatism Old and New: Selected Writings. New York: Prometheus Books.
Hagoort, P., Hald, L., Bastiaansen, M. and Petersson, K. M. 2004. ‘Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension’. Science 304: 438–41.
Haiman, J. 1978. ‘Conditionals are topics’. Language 54: 512–40.
Haiman, J. 1980a. ‘Dictionaries and encyclopedias’. Lingua 50: 329–57.
Hakulinen, A. 2009. ‘Conversation types’. In S. D’hondt, J. Östman, and J. Verschueren (eds.) The Pragmatics of Interaction, pp. 55–65. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hall, A. 2007. ‘Do discourse connectives encode concepts or procedures?’. Lingua 117(1): 149–74.
Halliday, M. 1963. Explorations in the Function of Language. London: Arnold.
Halliday, M. 1967a. Intonation and Grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton.
Halliday, M. 1967b. ‘Notes on transitivity and theme in English. Part II’. Journal of Linguistics 3: 199–244.
Halliday, M. 1994. Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
Hamblin, C. 1971. ‘Mathematical models of dialogue’. Journal of Philosophy 37: 130–55.
Hamblin, C. 1987. Imperatives. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hamilton, Sir William, of Edinburgh 1860. Lectures on Logic, Volume I. Edinburgh: Blackwood.
Hamm, F. and van Lambalgen, M. 2005. The Proper Treatment of Events. Oxford: Blackwell.
Han, C.-H. 2000. The Structure and Interpretation of Imperatives: Mood and Force in Universal Grammar. New York: Garland.
Hanks, P. (ed.) 1979. Collins Dictionary of the English Language. London: Collins.
Hannay, M. 1994. ‘The theme zone’. In R. Boogart and J. Noordegraaf (eds.) Nauwe Betrekkingen, pp. 107–17. Amsterdam: Neerlandistiek; Münster: Nodus Publikationen.
Hansen, M. B. M. 2008. Particles at the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface: Synchronic and Diachronic Issues; A Study with Special Reference to the French Phrasal Adverbs. Oxford: Elsevier.
Hansen, M. B. M. and Waltereit, R. 2006. ‘GCI theory and language change’. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 38: 235–68.
Happé, F. 1993. ‘Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism: a test of Relevance Theory’. Cognition 48: 101–19.
Happé, F. 1994. Autism: An Introduction to Psychological Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hare, B. and Tomasello, M. 2005. ‘Human-like social skills in dogs?’. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9: 439–44.
Harland, R. 1993. Beyond Super-Structuralism. London: Routledge.
Harnish, R. M. 1976. ‘Logical form and implicature’. In T. Bever, J. Katz and T. Langendoen (eds.) An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Ability, pp. 313–92. New York: Crowell.
Harnish, R. M. 1990. ‘Speech acts and intentionality’. In A. Burkhardt (ed.) Speech Acts, Meaning and Intentions: Critical Approaches to the Philosophy of John R. Searle, pp. 169–93. Berlin: W. de Gruyter.
Harnish, R. M. 2002. ‘Are performative utterances declarations?’. In G. Grewendorf and G. Meggle (eds.) Speech Acts, Mind, and Social Reality: Discussions with John R. Searle, pp. 41–54. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Harnish, R. M. 2004. ‘Performatives as constatives vs. declarations’. In F. Brisard, M. Meeuwis and B. Vandenabeele (eds.) Seduction, Community, Speech: A Festschrift for Herman Parrt, pp. 43–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Haspelmath, M. 1993. A Grammar of Lezgian. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Haspelmath, M. 1999. ‘Why is grammaticalization irreversible?’. Linguistics 37: 1043–68.
Haspelmath, M. 2003. ‘The geometry of grammatical meaning: semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison’. In M. Tomasello (ed.) The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, vol. ii, pp. 211–42. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Haspelmath, M. 2004. ‘On directionality in language change with particular reference to grammaticalization’. In O. C. M. Fischer, M. Norde and H. Perridon (eds.) Up and Down the Cline: The Nature of Grammaticalization (Typological Studies in Language 59), pp. 17–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Haspelmath, M. 2005. ‘Nominal and verbal conjunction’. In M. Haspelmath, M. S. Dryer, D. Gil and B. Comrie (eds.) The World Atlas of Language Structures, pp. 262–5. Oxford University Press.
Haspelmath, M. 2007. ‘Coordination’. In T. Shopen (ed.) Language Typology and Linguistic Description, 2nd edition, pp. 1–51. Cambridge University Press.
Haspelmath, M. 2008. ‘A frequentist explanation of some universals of reflexive marking’. Linguistic Discovery 6: 40–63.
Hasson, U. and Glucksberg, S. 2006. ‘Does negation entail affirmation? The case of negated metaphors’. Journal of Pragmatics 38: 1015–32.
Haugh, M. 2002. ‘The intuitive basis of implicature: Relevance theoretic implicitness versus Gricean implying’. Pragmatics 12(2): 117–34.
Haugh, M. 2003. ‘Anticipated versus inferred politeness’. Multilingua 22 (4): 397–413.
Haugh, M. 2007a. ‘The discursive challenge to politeness research: An interactional alternative’. Journal of Politeness Research 3: 295–317.
Haugh, M. 2007b. ‘Emic conceptualisations of (im)politeness and face in Japanese: implications for the discursive negotiation of second language learner identities’. Journal of Pragmatics 39: 657–80.
Haugh, M. 2007c. ‘The co-constitution of politeness implicature in conversation’. Journal of Pragmatics 39: 84–110.
Haugh, M. 2008a. ‘Intention in pragmatics’. Intercultural Pragmatics 5: 99–110.
Haugh, M. 2008b. ‘Intention and diverging interpretings of implicature in the “uncovered meat” sermon’. Intercultural Pragmatics 5: 201–29.
Haugh, M. 2008c. ‘The place of intention in the interactional achievement of implicature’. In I. Kecskes and J. Mey (eds.) Intention, Common Ground and the Egocentric Speaker-Hearer, pp. 45–86. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Haugh, M. 2008d. ‘Utterance-final conjunctive particles and implicature in Japanese conversation’. Pragmatics 18: 425–51.
Haugh, M. 2009. ‘Intention(ality) and the conceptualisation of communication in pragmatics’. Australian Journal of Linguistics 29: 91–113.
Haugh, M. 2010a. ‘Jocular mockery, (dis)affiliation and face’. Journal of Pragmatics 42: 2106–19.
Haugh, M. 2010b. ‘Co-constructing what is said in interaction’. In T. E. Németh and K. Bibok (eds.) The Role of Data at the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface, pp. 349–80. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Haugh, M. 2011. ‘Humour, face and im/politeness in getting acquainted’. In B. Davies, M. Haugh and A. Merrison (eds.) Situated Politeness, pp. 165--84. London: Continuum.
Hauser, M. 1996. The Evolution of Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hauser, M., Chomsky, N. and Fitch, W. T. 2002. ‘The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?’. Science 298: 1569–79.
Haviland, J. 1997. ‘Shouts, shrieks and shots: unruly political conversations in indigenous Chiapas’. Pragmatics 7: 547–73.
Hawkins, J. 2004. Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford University Press.
Hawthorne, J. 2004. Knowledge and Lotteries. Oxford University Press.
Heath, J. 1984. Functional Grammar of Nunggubuyu. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
Heath, J. 1986. ‘Syntactic and lexical aspects of nonconfigurationality in Nunggubuyu (Australia)’. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 4: 375–408.
Hedberg, N. 1990. Discourse Pragmatics and Cleft Sentences in English. Dissertation, University of Minnesota.
Hedberg, N. 2000. ‘The referential status of clefts’. Language 76: 891–920.
Hedberg, N. and Sosa, J. M. 2007. ‘The prosody of topic and focus in spontaneous English dialogue’. In C. Lee, M. Gordon and D. Büring (eds.) Topic and Focus: Cross-linguistic Perspectives on Meaning and Intonation, pp. 101–20. Dordrecht: Springer.
Heim, I. 1982. The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Heim, I. 1983. ‘On the projection problem for presuppositions’. In M. Barlow, D. Flickinger and M. Westcoat (eds.) Second Annual West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, pp. 114–26. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
Heim, I. 1992. ‘Presupposition projection and the semantics of attitude verbs’. Journal of Semantics 9: 183–221.
Heine, B. 1993. Auxiliaries: Cognitive Forces and Grammaticalization. New York: Oxford University Press.
Heine, B. 2002. ‘On the role of context in grammaticalization’. In I. Wischer and G. Diewald (eds.) New Reflections on Grammaticalization, pp. 83–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Heine, B. and Kuteva, T. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.
Heine, B., Claudi, U. and Hünnemeyer, F. 1991. Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. University of Chicago Press.
Heinemann, T. and Traverso, V. 2009. ‘Complaining in interaction’. Journal of Pragmatics 41: 2381–4.
Hendriks, P. and de Hoop, H. 2001. ‘Optimality theoretic semantics’. Linguistics and Philosophy 24: 1–32.
Hengeveld, K. and Mackenzie, L. J. 2008. Functional Discourse Grammar: A Typologically-based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford University Press.
Heritage, J. 1984. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Heritage, J. 1988. ‘Explanations as accounts: a conversation analytic perspective’. In C. Antaki (ed.) Analysing Everyday Explanation: A Casebook of Methods, pp. 127–44. London: Sage.
Heritage, J. 2005. ‘Conversation analysis and institutional talk’. In K. Fitch and R. Sanders (eds.) Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, pp. 103–47. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Heritage, J. 2009. ‘Conversation analysis as social theory’. In B. Turner (ed.) New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory, pp. 300–18. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Heritage, J. and Raymond, G. 2005. ‘The terms of agreement: indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction’. Social Psychology Quarterly 68: 15–38.
Heritage, J. and Raymond, G. (forthcoming). ‘Navigating epistemic landscapes: acquiescence, agency and resistance in responses to polar questions’. In J. P. de Ruiter (ed.) Questions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
Hernández-Flores, N. 1999. ‘Politeness ideology in Spanish colloquial conversation: the case of advice’. Pragmatics 9(1): 37–49.
Herring, S. 1999.
‘Interactional coherence in CMC’.
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 4:
http://jcmc.indiana.edu.
Herring, S. 2004. ‘Computer-mediated analysis. An approach to researching online behaviour’. In S. Barab, R. Kling and J. H. Gray (eds.) Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning, pp. 338–76. Cambridge University Press.
Herring, S. 2007.
‘A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse’.
Language@Internet 4:
www.languageatinternet.de.
Hetland, J. 2003. ‘Contrast, the fall-rise accent and information focus’. In J. Hetland and V. Molnár (eds.) Structure of Focus and Grammatical Relations (Linguistische Arbeiten 477), pp. 1–39. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Heyd, T. 2008. Email Hoaxes: Form, Function, Genre Ecology. Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 174. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Heyes, C. 2010. ‘Where do mirror neurons come from?’. Neuroscience and Biobehavioural Reviews 34: 575–83.
Hickok, G. 2009. ‘Eight problems for the mirror neuron theory of action understanding’. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 21: 1229–43.
Hickok, G. 2010. ‘The role of mirror neurons in speech and language processing’. Brain and Language 112: 1–2.
Hickok, G. and Hauser, M. 2010. ‘(Mis)understanding mirror neurons’. Current Biology 20: 593–4.
Higgins, C. (ed.) 2007. ‘A closer look at cultural differences. “Interculturality” in talk-in-interaction’. Journal of Pragmatics 17: 9–22.
Hill, B., Ide, S., Ikuta, S., Kawasaki, A. and Ogino, T. 1986. ‘Universals of linguistic politeness: quantitative evidence from Japanese and American English’. Journal of Pragmatics 10: 347–71.
Hills, D. 1997. ‘Aptness and truth in verbal metaphor’. Philosophical Topics 25: 117–54.
Hinnenkamp, V. 1995. ‘Intercultural communication’. In J. Verschueren, J.-O. Östman and J. Blommaert (eds.) Handbook of Pragmatics 1995. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins (loose-leaf publication).
Hirsch, R. 2010. ‘Making meaning together: a distributed story of speaking and thinking’. Language Sciences 32: 528–35.
Hirschberg, J. 1991. A Theory of Scalar Implicature. New York: Garland.
Hirschberg, J. and Ward, G. 1995. ‘The interpretation of the high-rise question contour in English’. Journal of Pragmatics 24: 407–12.
Hirschfeld, L. and Gelman, S. (eds.) 1994. Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture. Cambridge University Press.
Hoffmann, M. 1987. Negatio Contrarii: A Study of Latin Litotes. Assen: Van Gorcum.
Holes, C. 2004. Modern Arabic: Structures, Functions, Varieties. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Holmes, J. 1995. Women, Men and Politeness. London: Longman.
Holtgraves, T. 1997. ‘Politeness and memory for the wording of remarks’. Memory and Cognition 25: 106–16.
Holtgraves, T. and Yang, J.-N. 1990. ‘Politeness as universal: cross-cultural perceptions of request strategies and inferences based on their use’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59: 719–29.
Hooff, J. van 1972. ‘A comparative approach to the phylogeny of laughter and smiling’. In R. Hinde (ed.) Non-verbal Communication, pp. 209–38. Cambridge University Press.
Hooper, J. B. and Thompson, S. A. 1973. ‘On the applicability of root transformations’. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 465–97.
Hopper, P. J. 1991. ‘On some principles of grammaticization’. In E. Traugott and B. Heine (eds.) Approaches to Grammaticalization, vol. i, pp. 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hopper, P. J. and Thompson, S. A. 1980. ‘Transitivity in grammar and discourse’. Language 56: 251–99.
Hopper, P. J. and Traugott, E. C. 2003. Grammaticalization. 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press.
Horn, L. 1972. On the Semantic Properties of Logical Operators in English. UCLA dissertation, distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club, 1976.
Horn, L. 1973. ‘Greek Grice: a brief survey of proto-conversational rules in the history of logic’. Chicago Linguistic Society 9: 205–14.
Horn, L. 1978. ‘Some aspects of negation’. In J. H. Greenberg (ed.) Universals of Human Language, Vol. iv, pp. 127–210. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Horn, L. 1984a. ‘Ambiguity, parsimony, and the London school of parsimony’. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society 14: 108–31.
Horn, L. 1984b. ‘Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature’. In D. Schiffrin (ed.) Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications, pp. 11–42. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Horn, L. 1985. ‘Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity’. Language 61: 121–74.
Horn, L. 1988. ‘Pragmatic theory’. In F. Newmeyer (ed.) Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, vol. i, pp. 113–45. Cambridge University Press.
Horn, L. 1989. A Natural History of Negation. University of Chicago Press.
Horn, L. 1990. ‘Hamburgers and truth: why Gricean inference is Gricean’. BLS 16: 454–71.
Horn, L. 1991. ‘Duplex negatio affirmat…: The economy of double negation’. CLS 27(2): 80–106.
Horn, L. 1992a. ‘Pragmatics, implicature, and presupposition’. In W. Bright (ed.) International Encyclopaedia of Linguistics, vol. iii, pp. 260–6. New York: Oxford University Press.
Horn, L. 1992b. ‘The said and the unsaid’. In SALT II: Proceedings of the Second Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory, pp. 163–202. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Linguistics Department.
Horn, L. 2000. ‘From IF to IFF: conditional perfection as pragmatic strengthening’. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 289–326.
Horn, L. 2002. ‘Assertoric inertia and NPI licensing’. CLS 38(2): 55–82. Chicago Linguistics Society.
Horn, L. 2004. ‘Implicature’. In L. Horn and G. Ward (eds.) The Handbook of Pragmatics, pp. 3–28. Oxford: Blackwell.
Horn, L. 2005. ‘Current issues in neo-Gricean pragmatics’. Intercultural Pragmatics 2: 191–204.
Horn, L. 2006. ‘The border wars: a neo-Gricean perspective’. In K. Turner and K. von Heusinger (eds.) Where Semantics Meets Pragmatics, pp. 21–48. Oxford: Elsevier.
Horn, L. 2007a. ‘Neo-Gricean pragmatics: a Manichaean manifesto’. In N. Burton-Roberts (ed.) Pragmatics, pp. 158–83. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Horn, L. 2007b. ‘Toward a Fregean pragmatics: Voraussetzung, Nebengedanke, Andeutung’. In I. Kecskes and L. Horn (eds.) Explorations in Pragmatics: Linguistic, Cognitive, and Intercultural Aspects, pp. 39–69. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Horn, L. 2008. ‘“I love me some him”: the landscape of non-argument datives’. In O. Bonami and P. Cabredo Hofherr (eds.)
Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 7, pp.
169–92. Downloadable at
www.cssp.cnrs.fr/eiss7.
Horn, L. 2009a. ‘Only XL: the assertoric asymmetry of exponibles’. Paper presented at Semantics and Linguistics Theory Conference, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. May 2009.
Horn, L. 2009b. ‘WJ-40: Implicature, truth, and meaning’. International Review of Pragmatics 1: 3–34.
Horn, L. and Ward, G. (eds.) 2004. The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Horwich, P. 2002. ‘Deflating compositionality’. In E. Borg (ed.) Meaning and Representation, pp. 77–93. Oxford: Blackwell.
House, J. 1990. ‘Intonation structures and pragmatic interpretation’. In S. Ramsaran (ed.) Studies in the Pronunciation of English, pp. 38–57. London: Routledge.
House, J. 2000. ‘Understanding misunderstanding: A pragmatic-discourse approach to analysing mismanaged rapport in talk across cultures’. In H. Spencer-Oatey (ed.) Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport Through Talk Across Cultures, pp. 146–64. London: Continuum.
House, J. 2003. ‘Misunderstanding in intercultural university encounters’. In J. House, G. Kasper and S. Ross (eds.) Misunderstanding in Social Life, Discourse Approaches to Problematic Talk, pp. 22–56. London: Longman.
House, J. 2006. ‘Constructing a context with intonation’. Journal of Pragmatics 38: 1542–58.
House, J. 2007. ‘The role of prosody in constraining context selection: a procedural approach’. Nouveaux cahiers de linguistique française 28: 369–83.
Huang, Y. 2000. Anaphora: A Cross-linguistic Study. Oxford University Press.
Huang, Y. 2007. Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Huang, Y. 2009. ‘Neo-Gricean pragmatics and the lexicon’. International Review of Pragmatics 1: 118–53.
Huang, Y. 2010. ‘Pragmatics’. In L. Cummings (ed.) The Pragmatics Encyclopedia, pp. 341–5. London: Routledge.
Hugly, P. and Sayward, C. 1979. ‘A problem about conversational implicature’. Linguistics and Philosophy 3: 19–25.
Hungerland, I. 1960. ‘Contextual implication’. Inquiry 3: 211–58.
Husserl, E. 1900–1901. Logische Untersuchungen, vol. ii. Halle: Max Niemeyer. Trans. as Logical Investigations by J. N. Findlay. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1970.
Husserl, E. 1913. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Book 1: Allgemeine Einfürung in die reine Phänomenologie. Halle: Max Niemeyer. Trans. as Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology by W. R. B. Gibson. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1931. Reprinted 1958.
Hymes, D. 1972. ‘On communicative competence’. In J. Pride and J. Holmes (eds.) Sociolinguistics, pp. 269–93. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Iatridou, S. 2009. ‘De modo imperativo’. Lecture notes for a course on the syntax and semantics of imperatives at Ealing6, ENS, Paris.
Ide, S. 1989. ‘Formal forms and discernment: two neglected aspects of universals of linguistic politeness’. Multilingua 8: 223–48.
Imai, K. 1998. ‘Intonation and relevance’. In R. Carston and S. Uchida (eds.) Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications, pp. 69–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Israel, M., Harding, J. and Tobin, V. 2004. ‘On simile’. In M. Achard and S. Kemmer (eds.) Language, Culture, and Mind, pp. 123–35. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Iten, C. 2000. ‘The relevance of Argumentation Theory’. Lingua 110: 665–701.
Iten, C. 2005. Linguistic Meaning, Truth Conditions and Relevance. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ivanko, S. L. and Pexman, P. M. 2003. ‘Context incongruity and irony processing’. Discourse Processes 35: 241–79.
Izvorski, R. 1997. ‘The present perfect as an epistemic modal’. In A. Lawson (ed.) Semantics and Linguistic Theory VII, pp. 222–39.
Jackendoff, R. S. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jackendoff, R.S. 1985. ‘Multiple subcategorization and the Q-criterion: the case of climb’. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 271–95.
Jackendoff, R.S. 1995a. Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jackendoff, R.S. 1995b. ‘The boundaries of the lexicon’. In M. Everaert, E.-J. van der Linden, A. Schenk and R. Schreuder (eds.) Idioms: Structural and Psychological Perspectives, pp. 133–65. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Jackendoff, R.S. 1997. The Architecture of the Language Faculty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jackendoff, R.S. 1999. ‘What is a concept that a person may grasp it?’. In E. Margolis and S. Laurence (eds.) Concepts: Core Readings, pp. 305–33. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jackendoff, R.S. 2003. Foundations of Language. Oxford University Press.
Jackendoff, R. S. and Aaron, D. 1991. ‘Review of More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor by George Lakoff and Mark Turner’. Language 67: 320–38.
Jacobs, A. and Jucker, A. H. 1995. ‘The historical perspective in pragmatics’. In A. H. Jucker (ed.) Historical Pragmatics, pp. 3–33. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Jäger, G. 1996. ‘Only updates. On the dynamics of the focus particle “only”’. In P. Dekker and M. Stokhof (eds.) Proceedings of the 10th Amsterdam Colloquium, pp. 387–406. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jary, M. 1998. ‘Relevance theory and the communication of politeness’. Journal of Pragmatics 30: 1–19.
Jaszczolt, K. M. 1999. Discourse, Beliefs, and Intentions: Semantic Defaults and Propositional Attitude Ascription. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
Jaszczolt, K. M. 2000. ‘The default-based context-dependence of belief reports’. In K. M. Jaszczolt (ed.) The Pragmatics of Propositional Attitude Reports, pp. 169–85. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
Jaszczolt, K. M. 2002. Semantics and Pragmatics: Meaning in Language and Discourse. London: Longman.
Jaszczolt, K. M. 2005. Default Semantics: Foundations of a Compositional Theory of Acts of Communication. Oxford University Press.
Jaszczolt, K.M. 2008. ‘Psychological explanations in Gricean pragmatics and Frege's legacy’. In I. Kecskes and J. Mey (eds.) Intentions, Common Ground, and the Egocentric Speaker-Hearer, pp. 9–45. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Jaszczolt, K.M. 2009. Representing Time: An Essay on Temporality as Modality. Oxford University Press.
Jaszczolt, K. M. 2010a. ‘Semantics-pragmatics interface’. In L. Cummings (ed.) The Pragmatics Encyclopedia, pp. 458–62. London: Routledge.
Jaszczolt, K.M. 2010b. ‘Propositional attitudes’. In L. Cummings (ed.) The Pragmatics Encyclopedia, pp. 388–9. London: Routledge.
Jaszczolt, K. M. 2010c. ‘Default Semantics’. In B. Heine and H. Narrog (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, pp. 193–221. Oxford University Press.
Jefferson, G. 1978. ‘Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation’. In J. N. Schenkein (ed.) Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, pp. 219–48. New York: Academic Press.
Jefferson, G. 1979. ‘A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance-declination’. In G. Psathas (ed.) Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, pp. 79–95. New York: Irvington.
Jefferson, G. 1986. ‘Notes on “latency” in overlap onset’. Human Studies 9: 153–83.
Jefferson, G. 2004. ‘Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction’. In G. Lerner (ed.) Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, pp. 13–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jennings, R. 1994. The Genealogy of Disjunction. Oxford University Press.
Jensen, M. S. 1980. The Homeric Question and the Oral-Formulaic Theory. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.
Jespersen, O. 1924. The Philosophy of Grammar. London: George Allan and Unwin.
Ji, S. 2002. ‘Identifying episode transitions’. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 1257–72.
Johansson, M. 2002. Clefts in English and Swedish: A Contrastive Study of It-Clefts and Wh-Clefts in Original Texts and Translations. PhD dissertation. Lund University.
Johnson-Laird, P. 1983. Mental Models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Jucker, A. H. (ed.) 1995. Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English. Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 35. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Jucker, A. H. 2009. ‘Speech act research between armchair, field and laboratory: the case of compliments’. Journal of Pragmatics 41: 1611–35.
Jucker, A.H. (forthcoming). ‘Pragmatics and discourse’. In L. J. Brinton (ed.) Historical Linguistics of English, vol. ii. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Jucker, A. H. and Taavitsainen, I. (eds.) 2010. Handbook of Historical Pragmatics: Handbooks of Pragmatics 8. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Jucker, A. H. and Ziv, Y. (eds.) 1998. Discourse Markers. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Jucker, A. H., Schreier, D. and Hundt, M. (eds.) 2009. ‘Corpora: pragmatics and discourse’. In Papers from the 29th International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 29), Ascona, Switzerland (Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics 68), pp. 14–18. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Kalish, D., Montague, R. and Mar, G. 1980. Logic: Techniques of Formal Reasoning. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
Kamp, H. 1978. ‘Semantics versus pragmatics’. In F. Guenthner and S. Schmidt (eds.) Formal Semantics and Pragmatics for Natural Languages, pp. 255–87. Dordrecht: Foris.
Kamp, H. 1981. ‘A theory of truth and semantic representation’. In T. Janssen and M. Stokhof (eds.) Truth, Interpretation, and Information, pp. 1–34. Dordrecht: Foris.
Kamp, H. 1990. ‘Prolegomena to a structural account of belief and other attitudes’. In C. A. Anderson and J. Owens (eds.) Propositional Attitudes: The Role of Content in Logic, Language, and Mind, pp. 27–90. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Kamp, H. 1996. ‘Some elements of a DRT-based theory of the representation of mental states and verbal communication’. Unpublished ms.
Kamp, H. 2001. ‘The importance of presupposition’. In C. Rohrer and A. Rossdeutscher (eds.) Linguistic Form and its Justification: Selected papers from the SFB 340, 207–254. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Kamp, H. 2003. ‘Temporal relations inside and outside attitudinal contexts’. Paper presented at the workshop ‘Where Semantics Meets Pragmatics’, LSA Summer School, University of Michigan, July 2003.
Kamp, H. and Reyle, U. 1993. From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Kamp, H. and Rohrer, C. 1983. ‘Tense in texts’. In R. Bauerle, C. Schwarze and A. von Stechow (eds.) Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, pp. 250–69. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kamp, H. and Rossdeutscher, A. 1994. ‘DRS-construction and lexically driven inference’. Theoretical Linguistics 20: 165–235.
Kaplan, D. 1969. ‘Quantifying in’. In D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.) Words and Objections: Essays on the Work of W. V. Quine, pp. 206–42. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Kaplan, D. 1978. ‘Dthat’. In P. Cole (ed.) Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics, pp. 221–43. New York: Academic Press.
Kaplan, D. 1989a. ‘Demonstratives’. In J. Almog, J. Perry and H. K. Wettstein (eds.) Themes from Kaplan, pp. 481–563. Oxford University Press.
Kaplan, D. 1989b. Themes from Kaplan, ed. J. Almog, J. Perry and H. K. Wettstein. Oxford University Press.
Kaplan, D. 1989c. ‘Afterthoughts’. In J. Almog, J. Perry and H. K. Wettstein (eds.) Themes from Kaplan, pp. 565–614. Oxford University Press.
Kaplan, D. 1990. ‘Words’. Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 64: 93–119.
Kaplan, D. 1999. ‘The meaning of ouch and oops: Explorations in the theory of Meaning as Use’. Unpublished ms. UCLA.
Kaplan, D. 2004. ‘The meaning of “ouch” and “oops”’. Unpublished ms.
Kaplan, D. 2005. ‘Reading “On Denoting” on its centenary’. Mind 114: 933–1004.
Karttunen, L. 1973. ‘Presuppositions of compound sentences’. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 167–93.
Karttunen, L. 1974. ‘Presuppositions and linguistic context’. Theoretical Linguistics 1: 181–94.
Karttunen, L. 1976. ‘Discourse referents’. In J. McCawley (ed.) Syntax and Semantics 2: Notes From the Linguistic Underground, pp. 363–85. New York: Academic Press.
Karttunen, L. and Peters, S. 1979. ‘Conventional implicature’. In C.-K. Oh and D. A. Dinneen (eds.) Syntax and Semantics 11: Presupposition, pp. 1–56. New York: Academic Press.
Kasper, G. 1990. ‘Linguistic politeness: current research issues’. Journal of Pragmatics 14: 193–218.
Kasper, G. 1996. ‘The development of pragmatic competence’. In E. Kellerman, B. Weltens and T. Bongaerts (eds.) EUROSLA 6: A Selection of Papers 55(2), pp. 103–20. Amsterdam: VU Uitgeverij.
Kasper, G. 1998. ‘Interlanguage pragmatics’. In H. Byrnes (ed.) Learning Foreign and Second Languages: Perspectives in Research and Scholarship, pp. 183–208. New York: The Modern Language Association of America.
Kasper, G. 2004. ‘Speech acts in (inter)action: repeated question’. Intercultural Pragmatics 1: 125–35.
Kasper, G. 2006. ‘Speech acts in interaction: towards discursive pragmatics’. In K. Bardovi-Harlig, C. Felix-Brasdefer and A. S. Omar (eds.) Pragmatics and Language Learning, Vol. xi, pp. 281–314. Honolulu: National Foreign Language Resource Center, University of Hawai'i at Manoa.
Kasper, G. and Blum-Kulka, S. 1993. ‘Interlanguage pragmatics: An introduction’. In G. Kasper and S. Blum-Kulka (eds.) Interlanguage Pragmatics, pp. 3–17. Oxford University Press.
Kasper, G. and Rose, K. R. 2001. ‘Pragmatics in language teaching’. In K. Rose and G. Kasper (eds.) Pragmatics in Language Teaching, pp. 1–11. Cambridge University Press.
Katsos, N. 2007. Experimental Investigations on the Effects of Structure and Context on the Generation of Scalar Implicatures. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.
Katsos, N. 2008. ‘The semantics/pragmatics interface from an experimental perspective: the case of scalar implicature’. Synthese 165: 358–401.
Katsos, N. and Bishop, D. V. M. 2011. ‘Pragmatic tolerance: implications for the acquisition of informativeness and implicature’. Cognition 120: 67–81.
Katsos, N. and Smith, N. 2010. ‘Pragmatic tolerance and speaker-comprehender asymmetries’. In K. Franich, K. M. Iserman and L. L. Keil (eds.) Proceedings of the 34th Annual Boston Conference in Language Development, pp. 221–32. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Katsos, N., Breheny, R. and Williams, J. 2005. ‘The interaction of structural and contextual constraints during the on-line generation of scalar inferences’. In B. Bara, L. Barsalou and M. Bucciarelli (eds.) Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 1108–13. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Katzir, R. 2007. ‘Structurally defined alternatives’. Linguistics and Philosophy 30: 669–90.
Kaup, B. 2001. ‘Negation and its impact on the accessibility of text information’. Memory and Cognition 29: 960–7.
Kaup, B. and Zwaan, R. A. 2003. ‘Effects of negation and situational presence on the accessibility of text information’. Journal of Experimental Psychology (Learning, Memory, and Cognition) 29(3): 436–9.
Kaup, B., Lüdtke, J. and Zwaan, R. A. 2006. ‘Processing negated sentences with contradictory predicates: Is a door that is not open mentally closed?’. Journal of Pragmatics 38: 1033–50.
Kaup, B., Yaxley, R. H., Madden, C. J., Zwaan, R. A. and Lüdtke, J. 2007. ‘Experiential simulations of negated text information’. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 60: 976–90.
Kecskes, I. 2002. Situation-Bound Utterances in L1 and L2. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kecskes, I. 2004. ‘Lexical merging, conceptual blending, cultural crossing’. Intercultural Pragmatics 1: 1–26.
Kecskes, I. 2006. ‘Pragmatics aspects of multilingualism’. In K. Brown (ed.) Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edition. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
Kecskes, I. 2008. ‘Dueling context: a dynamic model of meaning’. Journal of Pragmatics 40: 385–406.
Kecskes, I. 2010a. ‘The paradox of communication: socio-cognitive approach to pragmatics’. Pragmatics and Society 1: 57–82.
Kecskes, I. 2010b. ‘Dual and multilanguage systems’. International Journal of Multilingualism. 7: 1–19.
Kecskes, I. 2011. ‘Intercultural pragmatics’. In D. Archer and P. Grundy (eds.) Pragmatic Reader, pp. 371--87. London: Routledge.
Kecskes, I. and Mey, J. 2008. ‘Introduction’. In I. Kecskes and J. Mey (eds.) Intention, Common Ground and the Egocentric Speaker-Hearer, pp. 1–8. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kecskes, I. and Zhang, F. 2009. ‘Activating, seeking and creating common ground: a socio-cognitive approach’. Pragmatics and Cognition 17: 331–55.
Keenan, E. L. 2003. ‘A historical explanation of some binding theoretic facts in English’. In J. Moore and M. Polinsky (eds.) The Nature of Explanation in Linguistic Theory, pp. 212–56. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Keenan, E. L. and Comrie, B. 1977. ‘Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar’. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 63–99.
Keller, R. 1994. On Language Change: The Invisible Hand in Language. Trans. B. Nerlich. London: Routledge (first published in German in 1990).
Kemmer, S. 1993. The Middle Voice. Typological Studies in Language 23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kempson, R. 1975. Presupposition and the Delimitation of Semantics. Cambridge University Press.
Kempson, R. 1986. ‘Ambiguity and the semantics–pragmatics distinction’. In C. Travis (ed.) Meaning and Interpretation, pp. 77–104. Oxford: Blackwell.
Kempson, R. 1988. ‘Grammar and conversational principles’. In F. J. Newmeyer and R. H. Robins (eds.) Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, vol. ii: Linguistic Theory: Extensions and Implications, pp. 139–63. Cambridge University Press.
Kempson, R., Meyer-Viol, W. and Gabbay, D. 2001. Dynamic Syntax: The Flow of Language Understanding. Oxford: Blackwell.
Kendon, A. 1988. ‘How gestures can become like words?’. In F. Poyotas (ed.) Cross-cultural Perspectives in Nonverbal Communication, pp. 131–41. Toronto: Hogrefe.
Kendon, A. 1992. ‘The negotiation of context in face-to-face interaction’. In A. Duranti and C. Goodwin (eds.) Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge University Press.
Kendon, A. 2004. Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge University Press.
Kenny, A. J. 1966. ‘Practical inference’. Analysis 26: 65–75.
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. 1997. ‘A multilevel approach in the study of talk in interaction’. Pragmatics 7: 1–20.
Kernfeld, B. 1994. The New Grove Dictionary of Jazz. London: Macmillan.
Keysar, B. 1994a. ‘Discourse context effects: metaphorical and literal interpretations’. Discourse Processes 18: 247–69.
Keysar, B. 1994b. ‘The illusory transparancy of intention: linguistic perspective taking in text’. Cognitive Psychology 26: 165–208.
Keysar, B. 2000. ‘The illusory transparency of intention: does June understand what Mark means because he means it?’. Discourse Processes 29: 161–72.
Keysar, B. 2007. ‘Communication and miscommunication: the role of egocentric processes’. Intercultural Pragmatics 4: 71–84.
Keysar, B. 2008. ‘Egocentric processes in communication and miscommunication’. In I. Kecskes and J. Mey (eds.) Intention, Common Ground and the Egocentric Speaker-Hearer, pp. 277–96. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Keysar, B. and Henly, A. 2002. ‘Speakers’ overestimation of their effectiveness’. Psychological Sciences 13: 207–12.
Kibrik, A. A. 2004. ‘Coordination in Upper Kuskokwim Athabaskan’. In M. Haspelmath (ed.) Coordinating Constructions, pp. 537–54. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Kidwell, M. and Zimmerman, D. 2006. ‘“Observability” in the interactions of very young children’. Communication Monographs 73: 1–28.
King, J. and Stanley, J. 2005. ‘Semantics, pragmatics, and the role of semantic content’. In Z. Szabó (ed.) Semantics Versus Pragmatics, pp. 111–64. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Kiparsky, P. 1968. ‘Linguistic universals and linguistic change’. In E. Bach and R. T. Harms (eds.) Universals in Linguistic Theory, pp. 171–202. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Kirk, L. 2010. ‘Searle, J.’. In L. Cummings (ed.) The Pragmatics Encyclopedia, pp. 416–19. London: Routledge.
Kissine, M. 2008a. ‘Assertoric commitments’. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 22: 155–78.
Kissine, M. 2008b. ‘Locutionary, illocutionary, perlocutionary’. Language and Linguistics Compass 2: 1189–202.
Kissine, M. 2009. ‘Illocutionary forces and what is said’. Mind and Language 24: 122–38.
Kissine, M. 2001. ‘Misleading appearances: Searle, assertion, and meaning’. Erkenntnis 74(1): 115–29.
Kissine, M. (forthcoming). ‘Speech act classifications’. In K. Turner and M. Sbisà (eds.) Speech Actions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Klein, W. 1992. ‘The present perfect puzzle’. Language 68: 525–52.
Klein, W. 2009. ‘How time is encoded’. In W. Klein and P. Li (eds.) The Expression of Time, pp. 39–81. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Klein, W. and von Stutterheim, C. 1987. ‘Quaestio und referentielle Bewegung in Erzählungen’. Linguistische Berichte 109: 163–83.
Knobe, J. 2003. ‘Intention action and side effects in ordinary language’. Analysis 63: 190–4.
Knobe, J. and Burra, A. 2006. ‘The folk concepts of intention and intentional action: a cross-cultural study’. Journal of Cognition and Culture 6: 113–32.
Kölbel, M. 2003. ‘Faultless disagreement’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104: 53–73.
Kölbel, M. 2008. ‘Motivations for relativism’. In M. Garcia-Carpintero and M. Kölbel (eds.) Relative Truth, pp. 1–40. Oxford University Press.
König, E. 1991. The Meaning of Focus Particles: A Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge.
König, E. and Siemund, P. 2000. ‘Intensifiers and reflexives: a typological perspective’. In Z. Frajzyngier and T. S. Curl (eds.) Reflexives: Forms and Functions, pp. 41–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
König, E. and Siemund, P. 2007. ‘Speech act distinctions in grammar’. In T. Shopen (ed.) Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. I: Clause Structure, pp. 276–324. 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press.
Koole, T. and Ten Thije, J. 1994. The Construction of Intercultural Discourse: Team Discussions of Educational Advisers. Amsterdam/Atlanta: Rodopi.
Koralus, P. 2010. Semantics in Philosophy and Cognitive Neuroscience: The Open Instruction Theory. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Philosophy, Princeton University.
Krahmer, E. 1998. Presupposition and Anaphora. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Krahmer, E. and van Deemter, K. 1998. ‘On the interpretation of anaphoric noun phrases: towards a full understanding of partial matches’. Journal of Semantics 15: 355–92.
Kriempardis, E. 2009. ‘Shared content as speaker meaning’. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 5: 161–90.
Krifka, M. 2005. ‘Association with focus phrases’. In V. Molnár and S. Winkler (eds.) The Architecture of Focus, pp. 105–36. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kripke, S. 1972. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kripke, S. 1977. ‘Speaker's reference and semantic reference’. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 2: 255–76. Reprinted in P. Ludlow (ed.) Readings in the Philosophy of Language, pp. 383–414. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kripke, S. 1979. ‘A puzzle about belief’. In A. Margalit (ed.) Meaning and Use, pp. 875–920. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. Reprinted in P. Ludlow (ed.) Readings in the Philosophy of Language, pp. 239–83. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Krippendorff, K. 1970. ‘On generating data in communication research’. Journal of Communication 20: 241–69.
Krippendorff, K. 2009. On Communicating: Otherness, Meaning, and Information. London: Routledge.
Krzeszowski, T. P. 1989. ‘Towards a typology of contrastive studies’. In W. Oleksy (ed.) Contrastive Pragmatics (Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 3), pp. 55–72. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kuhn, S. T. 1988. ‘Tense and time’. In D. Gabbay and F. Guenther (eds.) Handbook of Philosophical Logic IV, pp. 513–52. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Kühner, R. and Stegmann, C. 1914. Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache. Part 2: Satzlehre, vol. ii. Hannover: Hahn. (Reprinted 1992).
Kühnlein, P., Benz, A. and Sidner, C. 2010. Constraints in Discourse 2. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Kuipers, K. 2009. Formulaic Genres. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kukla, R. and Lance, M. 2009. ‘Yo!’ and ‘Lo!’: The Pragmatic Topography of the Space of Reasons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kumon-Nakamura, S., Glucksberg, S. and Brown, M., 1995. ‘How about another piece of pie: the allusional pretense theory of discourse irony’. Journal of Experimental Psychology (General) 124: 3–21. Reprinted in R. Gibbs and H. Colston (eds.) Irony in Language and Thought: A Cognitive Science Reader, pp. 57–95. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kuno, S. 1972. ‘Functional sentence perspective: a case study from Japanese and English’. Linguistic Inquiry 3: 269–320.
Kuno, S. 1976. ‘Subject, theme, and the speaker's empathy: a reexamination of relativization phenomena’. In C. N. Li (ed.) Subject and Topic, pp. 419–44. New York: Academic Press.
Kuno, S. 1987. Functional Syntax: Anaphora, Discourse, and Empathy. Chicago University Press.
Kuppevelt, J. van 1995. ‘Discourse structure, topicality and questioning’. Journal of Linguistics 31: 109–47.
Kuroda, S. Y. 1965. Generative Grammatical Studies in the Japanese Language. Dissertation, MIT.
Kuroda, S.Y. 1972. ‘The categorical and the thetic judgement: evidence from Japanese syntax’. Foundations of Language 9: 153–85.
Kuroda, S.Y. 1977. ‘Description of presuppositional phenomena from a non-presuppositionist point of view’. Lingvisticae Investigationes 1: 63–162.
Kuteva, T. 2001. Auxiliation: An Enquiry into the Nature of Grammaticalization. Oxford University Press.
Kuzar, R. 2009. ‘Sentence patterns in English and Hebrew’. Unpublished ms. Haifa University.
Kytö, M. and Romaine, S. 2005. ‘We had like to have been killed by thunder & lightning: the semantic and pragmatic history of a construction that like to disappeared’. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 6: 1–35.
Labov, W. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Reprinted Oxford: Blackwell, 1978.
Labov, W. 1978. ‘Denotational structure’. In D. Farkas, W. M. Jacobsen and K. W. Todrys (eds.) Papers from the Parasession on the Lexicon, pp. 220–60. Chicago Linguistics Society.
Lachenicht, L. 1980. ‘Aggravating language: a study of abusive and insulting language’. International Journal of Human Communication 13: 607–88.
Ladd, R. 1978. The Structure of Intonational Meaning. London: Indiana University Press.
Ladd, R. 1996. Intonational Phonology. Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. 1993. ‘The contemporary theory of metaphor’. In A. Ortony (ed.) Metaphor and Thought, pp. 202–51. 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G. 2008. ‘The neural theory of metaphor’. In R. Gibbs (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, pp. 17–38. Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, R. 1971. ‘If's, And's, and But's about conjunction’. In C. J. Fillmore and D. T. Langendoen (eds.) Studies in Linguistic Semantics, pp. 115–50. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
Lakoff, R. 1973. ‘The logic of politeness; or minding your p's and q's’. In C. Corum, T. C. Smith-Stark and A. Weiser (eds.) Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 292–305. Chicago Linguistic Society.
Lakoff, R. 2005. ‘Civility and its discontents: or, getting in your face’. In R. Lakoff and S. Ide (eds.) Broadening the Horizon of Linguistic Politeness, pp. 23–43. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lakusta, L., Wagner, L., O’Hearn, K. and Landau, B. 2007. ‘Conceptual foundations of spatial language: evidence for a goal bias in infants’. Language Learning and Development 3: 179–97.
Lambek, J. 1958. ‘The mathematics of sentence structure’. American Mathematical Monthly 65: 154–69.
Lambrecht, K. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus and the Mental Representation of Discourse Referents. Cambridge University Press.
Land, J. P. N. 1876. ‘Brentano's logical innovations’. Mind 1: 289–92.
Landau, B. 2010. ‘Paths in language and cognition: Universal asymmetries and their cause’. In G. Marottaet al. (eds.) Space in Language, pp. 73–94. Pisa: University of Pisa Press.
Landau, B. and Jackendoff, R. S. 1993. ‘“What” and “where” in spatial language and spatial cognition’. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16: 217–38.
Lang, E. 1984. The Semantics of Coordination. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Lang, E. 2000. ‘Adversative connectors on distinct levels of discourse: a re-examination of Eve Sweetser's three-level approach’. In E. Couper-Kuhlen and B. Kortmann (eds.) Cause – Condition – Concession – Contrast: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Langacker, R. W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. i: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R.W. 1990. ‘Subjectification’. Cognitive Linguistics 1: 5–38.
Langacker, R.W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. ii: Descriptive Application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R.W. 2006. ‘Subjectification, grammaticalization, and conceptual archetypes’. In A. Athanasiadou, C. Canakis and B. Cornillie (eds.) Subjectification: Various Paths to Subjectivity, pp. 17–40. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Langacker, R.W. 2007. ‘Constructing the meaning of personal pronouns’. In G. Radden, K.-M. Köpcke and T. Berg (eds.) Aspects of Meaning Construction, pp. 171–87. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Langdon, R., DaviesM. and Coltheart, M. 2002. ‘Understanding minds and understanding communicated meanings in schizophrenia’. Mind and Language 17: 68–104.
Langendoen, D. T. and Savin, H. 1971. ‘The projection problem for presuppositions’. In C. Fillmore and D. T. Langendoen (eds.) Studies in Linguistic Semantics, pp. 373–88. New York: Holt, Reinhardt and Winston.
Larson, R. K. and Ludlow, P. 1993. ‘Interpreted logical forms’. Synthese 95: 305–55. Reprinted in P. Ludlow (ed.) Readings in the Philosophy of Language, pp. 993–1039. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lascarides, A. and Asher, N. 1993. ‘Temporal interpretation, discourse relations and commonsense entailment’. Linguistics and Philosophy 16: 437–93.
Lasersohn, P. 1999. ‘Pragmatic halos’. Language 75: 522–51.
Lasersohn, P. 2005. ‘Context dependence, disagreement, and predicates of personal taste’. Linguistics and Philosophy 28: 643–86.
Lassiter, D. 2008. ‘Semantic externalism, language variation, and sociolinguistic accommodation’. Mind and Language 23: 607–33.
Lee, C. 1999. ‘Contrastive Topic: A locus of the interface evidence from Korean and English’. In K. Turner (ed.) The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View, pp. 317–41. CRiSPI 1. London: Elsevier.
Lee, C., Gordon, M. and Büring, D. (eds.) 2007. Topic and Focus: Cross-Linguistic Perspectives on Meaning and Intonation. Dordrecht: Springer.
Leech, G. 1980. Explorations in Semantics and Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Leech, G. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
Leech, G. 2007. ‘Politeness: is there an East-West divide?’. Journal of Politeness Research 3: 167–206.
Lehmann, C. 1995.
Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Munich: LINCOM EUROPA. 2nd revised edition of
Thoughts on Grammaticalization: A Programmatic Sketch, 1982. 2002 version is available at
www.christianlehmann.eu/.
Lehmann, C. 2008. ‘Information structure and grammaticalization’. In E. Seoane and M. J. López-Couso (eds.), in collaboration with T. Fanego, Theoretical and Empirical Issues in Grammaticalization, pp. 207–99. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lenzen, W. 1996. ‘Necessary conditions for negation operators’. In H. Wansing (ed.) Negation: A Notion in Focus, pp. 37–58. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Lerner, G. and Kitzinger, C. 2007. ‘Introduction: person-reference in conversation analytic research’. Discourse Studies 9: 427–32.
Leslie, A. 1987. ‘Pretense and representation: the origins of “theory of mind”’. Psychological Review 94: 412–26.
Levelt, W. 1999. ‘Perspective taking and ellipsis in spatial descriptions’. In P. Bloom, M. Peterson, L. Nadel and M. Garrett (eds.) Language and Space, pp. 77–107. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Levinson, S. C. 1979. ‘Activity types and language’. Linguistics 17: 365–99.
Levinson, S. C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, S. C. 1987. ‘Minimization and conversational inference’. In J. Verschueren and M. Bertuccelli-Papi (eds.) The Pragmatic Perspective, pp. 61–129. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Levinson, S. C. 1988. ‘Putting linguistics on a proper footing: Explorations in Goffman's participation framework’. In P. Drew and A. Wootton (eds.) Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, pp. 161–227. Oxford: Polity Press.
Levinson, S. C. 1995. ‘Three levels of meaning’. In F. Palmer (ed.) Grammar and Meaning, pp. 90–115. Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, S. C. 1997. ‘From outer to inner space: linguistic categories and non-linguistic thinking’. In J. Nuyts and E. Pederson (eds.) Language and Conceptualization, pp. 13–45. Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, S. C. 1999. ‘Frames of reference and Molyneux question: cross-linguistic evidence’. In P. Bloom, M. Peterson, L. Nadel and M. Garrett (eds.) Language and Space, pp. 109–69. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Levinson, S. C. 2000. Presumptive Meanings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Levinson, S. C. 2003a. ‘Contextualizing “contextualization cues”’. In S. L. Eerdmans, C. L. Prevignano and P. L. Thibault (eds.) Language and Interaction: Discussions with John J. Gumperz, pp. 31–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Levinson, S. C. 2003b. ‘Language and mind: let's get the issues straight!’. In D. Gentner and S. Goldin-Meadow (eds.) Language in Mind, pp. 25–45. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Levinson, S. C. 2003c. Space in Language and Cognition. Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, S. C. 2006a. ‘Cognition at the heart of human interaction’. Discourse Studies 8: 85–93.
Levinson, S. C. 2006b. ‘The language of space in Yélî Dnye’. In S. C. Levinson and D. Wilkins (eds.) Grammars of Space, pp. 157–205. Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, S. C. and Burenhult, N. 2009. ‘Semplates: a new concept in lexical semantics?’. Language 85: 153–74.
Levinson, S. C. and Wilkins, D. 2006. ‘Towards a semantic typology of spatial description’. In S. C. Levinson and D. Wilkins (eds.) Grammars of Space, pp. 512–52. Cambridge University Press.
Lewis, D. 1969. Convention. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lewis, D. 1970. ‘General semantics’. Synthese 22: 18–67.
Lewis, D. 1979. ‘Scorekeeping in a language game’. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8: 339–59.
Lewis, D. 2003. ‘Rhetorical motivations for the emergence of discourse particles, with special reference to English of course’. In T. van der Wouden, A. Foolen and P. Van de Craen (eds.) Particles, special issue of Belgian Journal of Linguistics 16: 79–91.
Li, C. N. and Thompson, S. A. 1976. ‘Subject and topic: a new typology of language’. In C. N. Li (ed.) Subject and Topic, pp. 457–89. New York: Academic Press.
Lieberman, M. 2000. ‘Intuition: A social-cognitive neuroscience approach’. Psychological Bulletin 126: 109–37.
Lightfoot, D. 1998. The Development of Language: Acquisition, Change, and Evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lightfoot, D. 2003. ‘Grammaticalisation: cause or effect?’. In R. Hickey (ed.) Motives for Language Change, pp. 99–123. Cambridge University Press.
Locher, M. 2004. Power and Politeness in Action: Disagreements in Oral Communication. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Locher, M. 2006. Advice Online: Advice-giving in an American Internet Health Column. Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 149. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Locher, M. and Watts, R. 2005. ‘Politeness theory and relational work’. Journal of Politeness Research 1: 9–33.
López-Couso, M. J. 2010. ‘Subjectification and intersubjectification’. In A. H. Jucker and I. Taavitsainen (eds.) Handbook of Historical Pragmatics, pp. 127–64. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Luckmann, T. 1995. ‘Interaction planning and intersubjective adjustment of perspectives by communicative genres’. In E. Goody (ed.) Social Intelligence and Interaction, pp. 175–88. Cambridge University Press.
Lucy, J. 1992. Language Diversity and Thought. Cambridge University Press.
Lucy, J. and Gaskins, S. 2003. ‘Interaction of language type and referent type in the development of nonverbal communication’. In D. Gentner and S. Goldin-Meadow (eds.) Language in Mind, pp. 465–92. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ludlow, P. 1995. ‘Logical form and the hidden-indexical theory: a reply to Schiffer’. Journal of Philosophy 92: 102–7.
Ludlow, P. 1996. ‘The adicity of “believes” and the hidden-indexical theory’. Analysis 56: 97–101.
Lüdtke, J., Friedrich, C. K., de Filippis, M. and Kaup, B. 2008. ‘Event-related potential correlates of negation in a sentence-picture verification paradigm’. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20: 1355–70.
Lyons, W. 1995. Approaches to Intentionality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
MacDonald, M. C. and Just, M. A. 1989. ‘Changes in activation levels with negation’. Journal of Experimental Psychology (Learning, Memory, and Cognition) 15: 633–42.
MacFarlane, J. 2005. ‘Making sense of relative truth’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105: 321–39.
MacFarlane, J. (forthcoming). ‘Relativism and knowledge attributions’. In S. Bernecker and D. Pritchard (eds.) Routledge Companion to Epistemology. London: Routledge.
MacLaury, R. E. 1997. Color and Cognition in Mesoamerica: Constructing Categories as Vantages. Austin: University of Texas Press.
MacWhinney, B. 1987. ‘The competition model’. In B. J. MacWhinney (ed.) Mechanisms of Language Acquisition, pp. 249–308. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
MacWhinney, B., Keenan, J. M. and Reinke, P. 1982. ‘The role of arousal in memory for conversation’. Memory and Cognition 10: 308–17.
Magri, G. 2009. ‘A theory of individual-level predicates based on blind mandatory scalar implicatures’. Natural Language Semantics 17: 245–97.
Maier, E. 2009. ‘Presupposing acquaintance: A unified semantics for de dicto, de re and de se belief reports’. Linguistics and Philosophy 32: 429–74.
Malle, B. 2004. How the Mind Explains Behaviour: Folk Explanations, Meaning, and Social Interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Malle, B. 2006. ‘Intentionality: morality, and their relationship in human judgment’. Journal of Cognition and Culture 6: 87–112.
Malle, B., Moses, L. and Baldwin, D. (eds.) 2001. Intentions and Intentionality: Foundations of Social Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Malotki, E. 1983. Hopi Time: A Linguistic Analysis of Temporal Concepts in the Hopi Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Malotki, E. 2002. Hopi Tales of Destructions. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Malt, B. C., Sloman, S. A. and Gennari, S. P. 2003. ‘Speaking versus thinking about objects and actions’. In D. Gentner and S. Goldin-Meadow (eds.) Language in Mind, pp. 81–111. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Manes, J. and Wolfson, N. 1981. ‘The compliment formula’. In F. Coulmas (ed.) Conversational Routine: Explorations in Standardized Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech, pp. 115–32. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.
Mao, L.-M. 1994. ‘Beyond politeness theory: “face” revisited and renewed’. Journal of Pragmatics 21: 451–86.
Marantz, A. 2005. ‘Generative linguistics within the cognitive neuroscience of language’. The Linguistic Review 22: 429–45.
Markee, N. 2000. Conversation Analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Markee, N. and Kasper, G. 2004. ‘Classroom talks: an introduction’. Modern Language Journal 88: 491–500.
Marquez Reiter, R. 2000. Linguistic Politeness in Britain and Uruguay: A Contrastive Study of Requests and Apologies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Martin, I. and McDonald, S. 2004. ‘An exploration of causes of non-literal language problems in individuals with Asperger syndrome’. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 34: 311–28.
Martin, N. M. 1989. Systems of Logic. Cambridge University Press.
Marty, A. 1918. Gesammelte Schriften, vol. ii, Part 1. Halle: Max Niemeyer.
Mastop, R. 2005. What Can You Do? Imperative Mood in Semantic Theory. PhD thesis, ILLC, University of Amsterdam.
Mathesius, V. 1928. ‘On linguistic characterology with illustrations from Modern English’. In Actes du Premier Congrès International de Linguistes à La Haye, pp. 56–63. Reprinted in J. Vachek (ed.) A Prague School Reader in Linguistics, pp. 59–67. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Matras, Y. 1998. ‘Utterance modifiers and universals of grammatical borrowing’. Linguistics 36: 281–331.
Matsumoto, Y. 1988. ‘Reexamination of the universality of face: Politeness phenomena in Japanese’. Journal of Pragmatics 12: 403–26.
Matsumoto, Y. 1995. ‘The conversational condition on Horn scales’. Linguistics and Philosophy 18: 21–60.
Mauri, C. 2008a. Coordination Relations in the Languages of Europe and Beyond. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Mauri, C. 2008b. ‘The irreality of alternatives: towards a typology of disjunction’. Studies in Language 32: 22–55.
Mauri, C. and Sansò, A. 2009. ‘Irrealis and clause linkage’. Paper presented at the 8th Biennial Meeting of the Association of Linguistic Typology, Berkeley, 23–26 July 2009.
Maydon, H. C. (ed.) 1951. Big Game Shooting in Africa. London: Seeley Service and Co.
Maynard Smith, J. 1982. Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge University Press.
McCawley, J. D. 1975. ‘Lexicography and the count–mass distinction’. In Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 314–21. Berkeley Linguistics Society. Reprinted in J. D. McCawley (ed.) Grammar and Meaning, pp. 165–73. Tokyo: Taikushan.
McCawley, J.D. 1978. ‘Conversational implicature and the lexicon’. In P. Cole (ed.) Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics, pp. 245–59. New York: Academic Press.
McGinn, C. 2000. Logical Properties: Identity, Existence, Predication, Truth. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
McGlone, M. 2001. ‘Concepts as metaphors’. In S. Glucksberg (ed.) Understanding Figurative Language: From Metaphors to Idioms, pp. 90–107. Oxford University Press.
McGregor, W. B. and Wagner, T. 2006. ‘The semantics and pragmatics of irrealis mood in Nyulnyulan languages’. Oceanic Linguistics 45: 339–79.
McHoul, A., Rapley, M. and Antaki, C. 2008. ‘You gotta light? On the luxury of context for understanding talk in interaction’. Journal of Pragmatics 40: 42–54.
McKay, T. and
Nelson, M. 2005. ‘Propositional attitude reports’. In E. N. Zalta (ed.)
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
http://plato.stanford.edu/.
McRae, K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J. and Tanenhaus, M. K. 1998. ‘Modeling thematic fit (and other constraints) within an integration competition framework’. Journal of Memory and Language 38: 283–312.
Meier, A. J. 1997. ‘Teaching the universals of politeness’. ELT Journal 51: 21–8.
Meierkord, C. and Fetzer, A. 2002. ‘Introduction: sequence, sequencing, sequential organization and sequentiality’. In A. Fetzer and C. Meierkord (eds.) Rethinking Sequentiality: Linguistics Meets Conversational Interaction, pp. 1–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Méndez-Naya, B. 2008. ‘The which is most and right harde to answere. Intensifying right and most in earlier English’. In R. Dury, M. Gotti and M. Dossena (eds.) English Historical Linguistics 2006, Vol. ii: Lexical and Semantic Change. Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, pp. 31–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Merchant, J. 2010. ‘Ellipsis’. In A. Alexiadou, T. Kiss, and M. Butt (eds.) A Handbook of Contemporary Syntax. 2nd edition. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Mey, J. (ed.) 1998a. Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics. Oxford: Elsevier.
Mey, J. 1998b. ‘Pragmatics’. In J. Mey (ed.) Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics, pp. 716–37. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Mey, J. 2001. Pragmatics: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
Mey, J. 2006a. ‘Pragmatic acts’. In K. Brown (ed.) Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, vol. x, pp. 5–11. 2nd edition. London: Elsevier.
Mey, J. 2006b. ‘Pragmatics: an overview’. In K. Brown (ed.) Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, vol. x, pp. 51–62. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Mey, J. 2009a. Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics. 2nd edition. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Mey, J. 2009b. ‘Speech acts in context’. Paper presented at the IPrA 2009 in Melbourne.
Mey, J. 2010. ‘Societal pragmatics’. In L. Cummings (ed.) The Pragmatics Encyclopedia, pp. 444–6. London: Routledge.
Michaelis, L. 2004. ‘Type shifting in construction grammar: an integrated approach to aspectual coercion’. Cognitive Linguistics 15: 1–67.
Mill, J. S. 1843. A System of Logic. London: Longmans. Reprinted in 1947.
Mill, J. S. 1867. An Examination of Sir William Hamilton's Philosophy. 3rd edition. London: Longman.
Mill, J.S. 1872. An Examination of Sir William Hamilton's Philosophy. 4th edition. London: Longmans, Green, Reader and Dyer.
Miller, J. 1965. ‘Living systems: basic concepts’. Behaviour Science 10: 193–237.
Millikan, R. 1984. Language, Thought and Other Biological Categories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mills, S. 2003. Gender and Politeness. Cambridge University Press.
Mills, S. 2009. ‘Impoliteness in a cultural context’. Journal of Pragmatics 41: 1047–60.
Minsky, M. 1975. ‘A framework for representing knowledge’. In P. Winton (ed.) The Psychology of Computer Vision, pp. 211–77. New York: MacGraw-Hill.
Mithun, M. 1988. ‘The grammaticization of coordination’. In J. Haiman and S. A. Thompson (eds.) Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse, pp. 331–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Mo, S., Su, Y., Chan, R. and Liu, J. 2008. ‘Comprehension of metaphor and irony in schizophrenia during remission: the role of theory of mind and IQ’. Psychiatry Research 157: 21–9.
Molencki, R. 2007. ‘The evolution of since in medieval English’. In U. Lenker and A. Meurman-Solin (eds.) Connectives in the History of English, pp. 97–113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Molnár, V. and Winkler, S. (eds.) 2005. The Architecture of Focus. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Monck, W. H. S. 1881. Sir William Hamilton. London: Sampson, Low.
Montague, R. 1974a. Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague. Ed. R. Thomason. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Montague, R. 1974b. ‘The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English’. In R. Thomason (ed.) Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague, pp. 247–70. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Montminy, M. 2010. ‘Context and communication: a defense of intentionalism’. Journal of Pragmatics 42: 2910–18.
Montry, J. 2002. How To Be Rude! A Training Manual for Mastering the Art of Rudeness. Incline Village, NV: Stairwell Press.
Moortgat, M. 1998. Categorial Investigations. Dordrecht: Foris.
Morgan, J. L. 1978. ‘Two types of convention in indirect speech acts’. In P. Cole (ed.) Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics, pp. 261–80. New York: Academic Press.
Mori, J. 2003. ‘The construction of interculturality: a study of initial encounters between American and Japanese students’. Research on Language and Social Interaction 36: 143–84.
Morrill, G. 1994. Type-Logical Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Morris, C. W. 1938. Foundations of the Theory of Signs. International Encyclopedia of Unified Science 1. University of Chicago Press.
MWDEU 1994. Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of English Usage. Springfield, MA: Merriam Webster.
Myers, G. 2009. ‘Structures of conversation’. In J. Culpeper, F. Katamba, P. Kerswill, R. Wodak and T. McEnery (eds.) English Language: Description, Variation and Context, pp. 501–11. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Nauze, F. 2008. Modality in Typological Perspective. PhD thesis, ILLC, University of Amsterdam.
Neale, S. 1990. Descriptions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Neale, S. 1992. ‘Paul Grice and the philosophy of language’. Linguistics and Philosophy 15: 509–59.
Neale, S. 1993. ‘Term limits’. Philosophical Perspectives 7: 89–123.
Neale, S. 1994. ‘Logical Form and LF’. In C. Otero (ed.) Noam Chomsky: Critical Assessments, pp. 788–838. London: Routledge.
Neale, S. 2000. ‘Reply to Stanley and Szabó’. Mind and Language 15: 284–94.
Neale, S. 2004. ‘This, that, and the other’. In A. Bezuidenhout and M. Reimer (eds.) Descriptions and Beyond, pp. 68–182. Oxford University Press.
Neale, S. 2008. ‘Term limits revisited’. Philosophical Perspectives 22: 370–442.
Nef, F. 1978. ‘Maintenant 1 et maintenant 2: sémantique et pragmatique de maintenant temporel et non temporel’. In J. David and R. Martin (eds.) La Notion d’Aspect, pp. 145–66. Paris: Klincksieck.
Nelson, C. A. and de Haan, M. 1996. ‘Neural correlates of infants’ visual responsiveness to facial expressions of emotion’. Developmental Psychobiology 29: 577–95.
Németh, T. E. 2008. ‘Verbal information transmission without communicative intention’. Intercultural Pragmatics 5: 153–76.
Nerlich, B. 2009. ‘History of pragmatics’. In J. Mey (ed.) Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics (2nd edition), pp. 328–35. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Nerlich, B. 2010. ‘History of pragmatics’. In L. Cummings (ed.) The Pragmatics Encyclopedia, pp. 192–5. London: Routledge.
Nerlich, B. and Clarke, D. D. 1996. Language, Action and Context: The Early History of Pragmatics in Europe and America, 1780–1930. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Neumann. J. von and Morgenstern, O. 1944. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press.
Nevala, M. 2004. Address in Early English Correspondence: Its Forms and Socio-pragmatic Functions. Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki 64. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
Nevalainen, T. and Raumolin-Brunberg, H. 2003. Historical Sociolinguistics: Language Change in Tudor and Stuart England. London: Pearson Education.
Nevalainen, T. and Rissanen, M. 2002. ‘Fairly pretty or pretty fair? On the development and grammaticalization of English downtoners’. Language Sciences 24: 359–80.
Neys, W. de and Schaeken, W. 2007. ‘When people are more logical under cognitive load: Dual task impact on scalar implicature’. Experimental Psychology 54: 128–33.
Nicolle, S. 1997. ‘A relevance theory perspective on grammaticalization’. Cognitive Linguistics 9: 1–35.
Nishizaka, A. 1995. ‘The interactive constitution of interculturality: how to be a Japanese with words?’. Human Studies 18: 301–26.
Noonan, M. 1992. A Grammar of Lango. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Norbury, C. 2005. ‘The relationship between theory of mind and metaphor: evidence from children with language impairment and autistic spectrum disorder’. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 23: 383–99.
Nöth, W. 1990. Handbook of Semiotics. Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Nouwen, R. 2007. ‘On appositives and dynamic binding’. Research on Language and Computation 5: 87–102.
Noveck, I. A. 2001. ‘When children are more logical than adults’. Cognition 86: 253–82.
Noveck, I. A. and Chevaux, F. 2002. ‘The pragmatic development of and’. In B. Skarabela (ed.) Proceedings of the 26th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, pp. 453–63. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Noveck, I. A. and Posada, A. 2003. ‘Characterizing the time course of an implicature: an evoked potentials study’. Brain and Language 85: 203–10.
Noveck, I. A. and Sperber, D. (eds.) 2004. Experimental Pragmatics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Noveck, I. A., Chierchia, G., Chevaux, F., Guelminger, R. and Sylvestre, E. 2002. ‘Linguistic-pragmatic factors in interpreting disjunctions’. Thinking and Reasoning 8: 297–326.
Nowell-Smith, P. H. 1954. Ethics. Harmondsworth: Pelican Books.
Nunberg, G. 1995. ‘Transfers of meaning’. Journal of Semantics 12: 109–32.
Nunberg, G. and Zaenen, A. 1992. ‘Systematic polysemy in lexicology and lexicography’. In H. Tommola, K. Varantola, T. Salmi-Tolonen and J. Schopp (eds.) EURALEX ’92: Proceedings I–II: Papers submitted to the 5th EURALEX International Congress on Lexicography in Tampere, Finland, pp. 387–98. Tampere: Tampereen yliopisto.
Nurmi, A., Nevala, M. and Palander-Collin, M. (eds.) 2009. The Language of Daily Life in England (1400–1800). Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 183. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Nuyts, J. 2000. ‘Intentionality’. In J. Verschueren, J.-O. Östman, J. Blommaert and C. Bulcaen (eds.) Handbook of Pragmatics: Quintessence. Amsterdam: John Benjamins (loose-leaf publication).
Nwoye, O. 1992. ‘Linguistic politeness and socio-cultural variations of the notion of face’. Journal of Pragmatics 18: 309–28.
Ockham, W. 1967–88. Guillelmi de Ockham Opera Philosophica et Theologica. Ed. G. Gál and S. Brown, 17 vols. St Bonaventure, NY: The Franciscan Institute, St Bonaventure University.
O’Connor, J. and Arnold, G. 1973. Intonation of Colloquial English. Harlow: Longman.
O’Driscoll, J. 1996. ‘About face: a defence and elaboration of universal dualism’. Journal of Pragmatics 25: 1–32.
O’Driscoll, J. 2007. ‘Brown and Levinson's face: How it can—and can't—help us to understand interaction across cultures’. Intercultural Pragmatics 4: 463–92.
O’Hair, S. G. 1969. ‘Implications and meaning’. Theoria 35: 38–54.
Ohori, T. 2004. ‘Coordination in Mentalese’. In M. Haspelmath (ed.) Coordinating Constructions, pp. 41–66. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Oleksy, W. (ed.) 1989. Contrastive Pragmatics. Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 3. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
O’Neill, D. K. 1996. ‘Two-year-old children's sensitivity to a parent's knowledge state when making requests’. Child Development 67: 659–77.
Onodera, N. O. and Suzuki, R. (eds.) 2007. Subjectivity, Intersubjectivity and Historical Changes in Japanese. Special issue of Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8 (2).
Origgi, G. and Sperber, D. 2000. ‘Evolution, communication and the proper function of language’. In P. Carruthers and A. Chamberlain (eds.) Evolution and the Human Mind: Modularity, Language and Meta-cognition, pp. 140–69. Cambridge University Press.
Ortony, A., Schallert, D. L., Reynolds, R. E. and Antos, S. J. 1978. ‘Interpreting metaphors and idioms: some effects of context on comprehension’. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 17: 465–77.
Pacherie, E. 2000. ‘The content of intentions’. Mind and Language 15: 400–32.
Pacherie, E. 2003. ‘Intention’. In L. Nadel (ed.) Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, pp. 599–604. London: Macmillan.
Pacherie, E. 2006. ‘Towards a dynamic theory of intentions’. In S. Pockett, W. Banks and S. Gallagher (eds.) Does Consciousness Cause Behaviour? An Investigation of the Nature of Volition, pp. 145–67. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pacherie, E. 2007. ‘Is collective intentionality really primitive?’. In C. Penco, M. Beaney and M. Vignolo (eds.) Explaining the Mental: Naturalist and Non-naturalist Approaches to Mental Acts and Processes, pp. 153–75. Newcastle-on-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press.
Pacherie, E. 2008. ‘The phenomenology of action: a conceptual framework’. Cognition 107: 179–217.
Pacherie, E. and Dokie, J. 2006. ‘From mirror neurons to joint actions’. Cognitive Systems Research 7: 101–12.
Padilla Cruz, M. 2009a. ‘Towards an alternative relevance-theoretic approach to interjections’. International Review of Pragmatics 1: 182–206.
Padilla Cruz, M. 2009b. ‘Might interjections encode concepts?’ Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 5: 241–70.
Pagin, P. 2004. ‘Is assertion social?’. Journal of Pragmatics 36: 833–59.
Pagin, P. 2006. ‘Meaning holism’. In B. Smith and E. Lepore (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language, pp. 213–32. Oxford University Press.
Pagin, P. and Pelletier, J. 2007. ‘Context, content and communication’. In G. Preyer and G. Peter (eds.) Context-Sensitivity and Semantic Minimalism, pp. 25–62. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Pakkala-Weckström, M. 2010. ‘Chaucer’. In A. H. Jucker and I. Taavitsainen (eds.) Handbook of Historical Pragmatics (Handbooks of Pragmatics 8), pp. 219–45. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Pandharipande, R. 1997. Marathi. London/New York: Routledge.
Panther, K.-U. and Thornburg, L. L. 2003a. ‘Introduction. On the nature of conceptual metonymy’. In K.-U. Panther and L. L. Thornburg (eds.) Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing, pp. 1–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Panther, K.-U. and Thornburg, L.L. 2003b. ‘Metonymies as natural inference and activation schemas: the case of dependent clauses as independent speech acts’. In K.-U. Panther and L. L. Thornburg (eds.) Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing, pp. 126–47. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Papafragou, A. 2000. Modality: Issues in the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Papafragou, A. and Musolino, J. 2003. ‘Scalar implicatures: experiments at the semantics/pragmatics interface’. Cognition 86: 253–82.
Papafragou, A. and Tantalou, N. 1998. ‘The other side of language: pragmatic competence’. Journal of Neurolinguistics 11: 1–10.
Paradis, M. 2004. ‘Children's computation of implicatures’. Language Acquisition 12: 71–82.
Paraskevaides, H. A. 1984. The Use of Synonyms in Homeric Formulaic Diction. Amsterdam: A. M. Hakkert.
Parmentier, R. J. 1997. ‘Charles S. Peirce’. In J. Verschueren, J.-O. Östman, J. Blommaert and C. Bulcaen (eds.) Handbook of Pragmatics 1997. Amsterdam: John Benjamins (loose-leaf publication).
Parsons, T. 1968[1937]. The Structure of Social Action. New York: Free Press.
Partee, B. 1973. ‘Some structural analogies between tenses and pronouns in English’. Journal of Philosophy 70: 601–9.
Partee, B. (ed.) 1976. Montague Grammar. New York: Academic Press.
Partee, B. 1984. ‘Nominal and temporal anaphora’. Linguistics and Philosophy 7: 243–86.
Partee, B. 1999. ‘Focus, quantification, and semantics-pragmatics issues’. In P. Bosch and R. van der Sandt (eds.) Focus: Linguistic, Cognitive, and Computational Perspectives, pp. 213–31. Cambridge University Press.
Paul, H. 1880. Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Paul, H. 1889. Principles of the History of Language. Trans. H. A. Strong. London: Macmillan.
Payne, J. 1985. ‘Complex phrases and complex sentences’. In T. Shopen (ed.) Complex Constructions, vol. iiof Language Typology and Syntactic Description, pp. 3–41. Cambridge University Press.
Pearsall, J. (ed.) 1998. New Oxford Dictionary of English. Oxford University Press.
Pederson, E., Danziger, E., Wilkins, D. P., Levinson, S. C., Kita, S. and Senft, G. 1998. ‘Semantic typology and spatial conceptualization’. Language 74: 557–89.
Pelczar, M. W. 2004. ‘The indispensability of Farbung’. Synthese 138: 49–77.
Pelczar, M. W. 2007. ‘Forms and objects of thought’. Linguistics and Philosophy 30: 97–122.
Peleg, O. and Eviatar, Z. 2008. ‘Hemispheric sensitivities to lexical and contextual constraints: Evidence from ambiguity resolution’. Brain and Language 105: 71–82.
Peleg, O. and Eviatar, Z. 2009. ‘The disambiguation of homophonic versus heterophonic homographs in the two cerebral hemispheres’. Brain and Cognition 70: 154–62.
Peleg, O. and Giora, R. (in press). ‘Salient meanings: the whens and where's’. In K. Allan and K. M. Jaszczolt (eds.) Salience and Defaults in Utterance Processing. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Peleg, O., Giora, R., and Fein, O. 2001. ‘Salience and context effects: Two are better than one’. Metaphor and Symbol 16: 173–92.
Peleg, O., Giora, R., and Fein, O. 2004. ‘Contextual strength: The whens and hows of context effects’. In I. Noveck and D. Sperber (eds.), Experimental Pragmatics, pp. 172–86. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Peleg, O., Giora, R., and Fein, O. 2008. ‘Resisting contextual information: You can't put a salient meaning down’. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 4(1): 13–44.
Pell, M. 2002. ‘Surveying emotional prosody in the brain’. In B. Bel and I. Marlien (eds.) Proceedings of the Speech Prosody 2002 Conference, pp. 77–82. Denver, CO.
Peregrin, J. 2001. Meaning and Structure. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Peregrin, J. 2008. ‘Inferentialist approach to semantics’. Philosophy Compass 3: 1208–23.
Peregrin, J. 2009. ‘Normative pragmatics’. In L. Cummings (ed.) The Pragmatics Encyclopedia, pp. 297–330. London: Routledge.
Peregrin, J. 2011. ‘The enigma of rules’. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 18: 377–94.
Perner, J. and Winner, E. 1985. ‘“John thinks, that Mary thinks that…”. Attribution of second-order belief by 5- to 10-year-old children’. Journal of Child Experimental Psychology 39: 437–71.
Perry, J. 1977. ‘Frege on demonstratives’. Philosophical Review 86: 474–97. Reprinted in P. Ludlow (ed.) Readings in the Philosophy of Language, pp. 693–715. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Perry, J. 2001. Reference and Reflexivity. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Perry, J. and Croft, D. 1968–1977. ‘Dad's Army’. British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). UK.
Petrilli, S. 2000. ‘Charles Morris’. In J. Verschueren, J.-O. Östman, J. Blommaert and C. Bulcaen (eds.) Handbook of Pragmatics 2000. Amsterdam: John Benjamins (loose-leaf publication).
Petrus, K. (ed.) 2010. Meaning and Analysis: New Essays on Grice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pexman, P. M., Ferretti, T. R. and Katz, A. N. 2000. ‘Discourse factors that influence on-line reading of metaphor and irony’. Discourse Processes 29: 201–22.
Phillips, R. D., Wagner, S. H., Fells, C. A. and Lynch, M. 1990. ‘Do infants recognise emotion in facial expressions? Categorical and metaphorical evidence’. Infant Behaviour and Development 13: 71–84.
Pierrehumbert, J. 1980. The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Pierrehumbert, J. and Hirschberg, J. 1990. ‘The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse’. In P. Cohen, J. Morgan and M. Pollack (eds.) Intentions in Communication, pp. 271–311. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pietroski, P. 2005. ‘Meaning before truth’. In G. Preyer and G. Peter (eds.) Contextualism in Philosophy: Knowledge, Meaning, and Truth, pp. 255–302. Oxford University Press.
Pilkington, A. 2000. Poetic Effects: A Relevance Theory Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Piller, I. 2007. ‘Linguistics and intercultural communication’. Language and Linguistics Compass 1.3: 208–26.
Pizziconi, B. 2003. ‘Re-examining politeness, face and the Japanese language’. Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1471–506.
Placencia, M. E. 2008. ‘Requests in corner shop transaction in Ecuadorian Andean and Coastal Spanish’. In K. P. Schneider and A. Barron (eds.) Variational Pragmatics: A Focus on Regional Varieties in Pluricentric Languages (Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 178), pp. 307–32. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Pollard, C. and Sag, I. 1994. Head-Driven Phrase-Structure Grammar. University of Chicago Press.
Pomerantz, A. 1984. ‘Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/ dispreferred turn shapes’. In J. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds.) Structures of Social Action, pp. 57–101. Cambridge University Press.
Pomerantz, A. 1988. ‘Offering a candidate answer: an information seeking strategy’. Communication Monographs 55: 360–73.
Portner, P. 2003. ‘The temporal semantics and modal pragmatics of the perfect’. Linguistics and Philosophy 26: 459–510.
Portner, P. 2007. ‘Imperative and modals’. Natural Language Semantics 4: 351–83.
Potts, C. 2005. The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford University Press.
Potts, C. 2007a. ‘Into the conventional-implicature dimension’. Philosophy Compass 2: 665–79.
Potts, C. 2007b. ‘The expressive dimension’. Theoretical Linguistics 33: 165–98.
Pouscoulous, N., Noveck, I., Politzer, G. and Bastide, A. 2007. ‘A developmental investigation of processing costs in implicature production’. Language Acquisition 14: 347–76.
Prandi, M. 2004. The Building Blocks of Meaning. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Predelli, S. 1998a. ‘I am not here now’. Analysis 58: 102–15.
Predelli, S. 1998b. ‘Utterance, interpretation, and the logic of indexicals’. Mind and Language 13: 400–14.
Prevignano, C. and di Luzio, A. 2003. ‘A discussion with John J. Gumperz’. In S. L. Eerdmans, C. L. Prevignano and P. L. Thibault (eds.) Language and Interaction: Discussions with John J. Gumperz, pp. 7–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Prince, E. F. 1978. ‘A comparison of WH-clefts and IT-clefts in discourse’. Language 54: 883–906.
Prince, E. F. 1981. ‘Towards a taxonomy of given/new information’. In P. Cole (ed.) Radical Pragmatics, pp. 223–55. New York: Academic Press.
Prince, E. F. 1985. ‘Fancy syntax and shared knowledge’. Journal of Pragmatics 9: 65–81.
Prince, E. F. 1988. ‘Discourse analysis: a part of the study of linguistic competence’. In F. J. Newmeyer and R. H. Robins (eds.) Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, vol. ii: Linguistic Theory: Extensions and Implications, pp. 164–82. Cambridge University Press.
Prince. E. F. 1992. ‘The ZPG letter: subjects, definiteness, and information status’. In S. Thompson and W. Mann (eds.) Discourse Description: Diverse Analyses of a Fund Raising Text, pp. 295–325. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Prince, E. F. 1998. ‘On the limits of syntax, with reference to left-dislocation and topicalization’. In P. W. Culicover and L. McNally (eds.) Syntax and Semantics 29: The Limits of Syntax, pp. 281–302. San Diego: Academic Press.
Purver, M., Cann, R. and Kempson, R. 2006. ‘Grammars as parsers: the dialogue challenge’. Research on Language and Computation 4: 289–326.
Pustejovsky, J. 1995. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Putnam, H. 1975. ‘The meaning of meaning’. In H. Putnam, Philosophical Papers, vol. ii, pp. 215–71. Cambridge University Press.
Quine, W. V. O. 1956. ‘Quantifiers and propositional attitudes’. Journal of Philosophy 53: 177–87. Reprinted in A. Marras (ed.) Intentionality, Mind and Language, pp. 402–14. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Quine, W. V. O. 1960. Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Quine, W. V. O. 1965. Elementary Logic. New York: Harper and Row.
Quine, W. V. O. 1973. The Roots of Reference. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.
Quine, W. V. O. 1981. Mathematical Logic. Revised edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Quine, W. V. O. 1992. Pursuit of Truth. 2nd revised edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartvik, J. 1972. A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartvik, J. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Rando, E. and Napoli, D. J. 1978. ‘Definites in there sentences’. Language 54: 300–13.
Ravelli, L. 2003. ‘A dynamic perspective: implications for metafunctional interaction and an understanding of Theme’. In A. Simon-Vandenbergen, M. Taverniers and L. Ravelli (eds.) Grammatical Metaphor, pp. 187–234. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Raymond, G. 2003. ‘Grammar and social organization: yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding’. American Sociological Review 68: 939–67.
Raymond, G. and Heritage, J. 2006. ‘The epistemics of social relations: owning grandchildren’. Language in Society 35: 677–705.
Reboul, A. 1997. ‘What (if anything) is accessibility? A relevance-oriented criticism of Ariel's accessibility theory of referring expressions’. In J. H. Connolly, R. M. Vismans, C. S. Butler and R. A. Gatward (eds.) Discourse and Pragmatics in Functional Grammar, pp. 91–108. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Recanati, F. 1986. ‘On defining communicative intentions’. Mind and Language 1: 213–42.
Recanati, F. 1987. Meaning and Force: The Pragmatics of Performative Utterances. Cambridge University Press.
Recanati, F. 1989. ‘The pragmatics of what is said’. Mind and Language 4: 295–329. Reprinted in S. Davis (ed.) 1991, Pragmatics: A Reader, pp. 97–120. Oxford University Press.
Recanati, F. 1993. Direct Reference: From Language to Thought. Oxford: Blackwell.
Recanati, F. 1994. ‘Contextualism and anti-contextualism in the philosophy of language’. In S. Tsohatzidis (ed.) Foundations of Speech Act Theory, pp. 156–66. London: Routledge.
Recanati, F. 1995. ‘The alleged priority of literal interpretation’. Cognitive Science 19: 207–32.
Recanati, F. 2000. Oratio Obliqua, Oratio Recta: The Semantics of Metarepresentations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Recanati, F. 2001. ‘What is said’. Synthese 128: 75–91.
Recanati, F. 2002. ‘Unarticulated constituents’. Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 299–345.
Recanati, F. 2003. ‘Embedded implicatures’. Philosophical Perspectives 17: 299–332.
Recanati, F. 2004a. Literal Meaning. Cambridge University Press.
Recanati, F. 2004b. ‘Pragmatics and semantics’. In L. Horn and G. Ward (eds.) The Handbook of Pragmatics, pp. 442–62. Oxford: Blackwell.
Recanati, F. 2005. ‘Literalism and contextualism: some varieties’. In G. Preyer and G. Peter (eds.) Contextualism in Philosophy: Knowledge, Meaning, and Truth, pp. 171–96. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Recanati, F. 2007. Perspectival Thought: A Plea for (Moderate) Relativism. Oxford University Press.
Recanati, F. 2008. ‘Moderate relativism’. In M. Garcia-Carpintero and M. Kölbel (eds.) Relative Truth, pp. 41–62. Oxford University Press.
Recanati, F. 2010. Truth-Conditional Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Reddy, M. 1979. ‘The conduit metaphor’. In A. Ortony (ed.) Metaphor and Thought, pp. 164–201. Cambridge University Press.
Reeder, K. 1978. ‘The emergence of illocutionary skills’. Journal of Child Language 7: 13–28.
Reichenbach, H. 1947. Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York: Free Press.
Reimer, M. 1995. ‘Performative utterances: a reply to Bach and Harnish’. Linguistics and Philosophy 18: 655–75.
Reinhart, T. 1981. ‘Pragmatics and linguistics. An analysis of sentence topics’. Philosophica 27: 53–94.
Reinhart, T. and Reuland, E. 1993. ‘Reflexivity’. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 657–720.
Reyle, U. 1998. ‘A note on enumerations and the semantics of puis and alors’. Cahiers de Grammaire 23: 67–79.
Rhodes, R. 1989. ‘“We are going to go there”: positive politeness in Ojibwa’. Multilingua 8: 249–58.
Richard, M. 1990. Propositional Attitudes: An Essay on Thoughts and How We Ascribe Them. Cambridge University Press.
Richard, M. 1995. ‘Defective contexts, accommodation, and normalization’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 25: 551–70.
Rissanen, M., Kytö, M. and Palander-Collin, M. 1993. Early English in the Computer Age: Explorations Through the Helsinki Corpus. Topics in English Linguistics 11. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Rizzolatti, G. and Craighero, L. 2004. ‘The mirror-neuron system’. Annual Review of Neuroscience 27: 169–92.
Rizzolatti, G. and Fabbri Destro, M. 2007. ‘Understanding action and the intentions of others: the basic neural mechanism’. European Review 15: 209–22.
Rochemont, M. 1986. Focus in Generative Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Romero-Trillo, J. (ed.) 2008. Pragmatics and Corpus Linguistics: A Mutualistic Entente. Mouton Series in Pragmatics 2. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Rooij, R. van 2007. ‘Strengthening conditional presuppositions’. Journal of Semantics 24: 289–304.
Rooth, M. 1985. Association With Focus. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Rooth, M. 1992. ‘A theory of focus interpretation’. Natural Language Semantics 1: 75–116.
Ross, J. R. 1967. Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Ph.D. thesis, MIT.
Ross, J. R. 1970. ‘On declarative sentences’. In R. A. Jacobs and P. S. Rosenbaum (eds.) Readings in English Transformational Grammar, pp. 222–72. Waltham, MA: Ginn.
Ross, J.R. 1972. ‘The category squish: Endstation Hauptwort’. In P. M. Peranteau, J. N. Levi and G. C. Phares (eds.) Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 316–38. Chicago Linguistic Society.
Rothschild, D. and Segal, G. 2009. ‘Indexical predicates’. Mind and Language 24: 467–93.
Ruhi, S. 2007. ‘Higher-order intentions and self-politeness in evaluations of (im)politeness: the relevance of compliment responses’. Australian Journal of Linguistics 27: 107–45.
Ruhi, S. 2010. ‘Face as an indexical category in interaction’. Journal of Pragmatics 42: 2131–46.
Russell, Benjamin 2006. ‘Against grammatical computation of scalar implicatures’. Journal of Semantics 23: 361–82.
Russell, Benjamin 2007. ‘Imperatives in conditional conjunction’. Natural Language Semantics 15: 131–66.
Russell, Bertrand 1905. ‘On denoting’. Mind 14: 479–93. Reprinted in B. Russell, Logic and Knowledge: Essays 1901–1950, pp. 49–56. London: Allen and Unwin.
Russell, Bertrand 1911. ‘Knowledge by acquaintance and knowledge by description’. Publications of the Aristotelian Society 11: 108–28. In B. Russell, Mysticism and Logic and Other Essays, pp. 209–32. London: Allen and Unwin, 1918.
Russell, Bertrand 1918. ‘The philosophy of logical atomism’. The Monist 28: 495–527. In R. C. Marsh (ed.) Logic and Knowledge, pp. 175–282. London: Allen and Unwin, 1956.
Russell, Bertrand 1919a. ‘Descriptions’. In B. Russell, Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy, pp. 167–80. London: Allen and Unwin. Reprinted in A. P. Martinich (ed.) 1990, The Philosophy of Language (2nd edition), pp. 213–19. Oxford University Press.
Russell. Bertrand 1919b. Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Sacks, H. 1986. ‘Some considerations of a story told in ordinary conversations’. Poetics 15: 127–38.
Sacks, H. 1992. Lectures on Conversation, vol. i. Oxford: Blackwell. (First published 1964.)
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. and Jefferson, G. 1974. ‘A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation’. Language 50.4: 696–735.
Sadock, J. M. 1974. Toward a Linguistic Theory of Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press.
Sadock, J. M. 1978. ‘On testing for conversational implicature’. In P. Cole (ed.) Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics, pp. 281–97. New York: Academic Press.
Sadock, J. M. 2004. ‘Speech acts’. In L. Horn and G. Ward (eds.) The Handbook of Pragmatics, pp. 53–73. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sadock, J. M. and Zwicky, A. M. 1985. ‘Speech act distinctions in syntax’. In T. Shopen (ed.) Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. i: Clause Structure, pp. 155–96. Cambridge University Press.
Sag, I. and Liberman, M. 1975. ‘The intonational disambiguation of indirect speech acts’. In R. E. Grossman, L. J. San and T. J. Vance (eds.) Papers from the Eleventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, pp. 487–97. Chicago Linguistics Society.
Salmon, N. 1986. Frege's Puzzle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Samovar, L. A. and Porter, R. 2001. Intercultural Communication Reader. New York: Thomas Learning Publications.
Sanders, R. 1987. Cognitive Foundations of Calculated Speech. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Sandt, R. van der 1982. Kontekst en Presuppositie. Nijmegen: NIS.
Sandt. R. van der 1988. Context and Presupposition. London: Croom Helm.
Sandt. R. van der 1992. ‘Presupposition projection as anaphora resolution’. Journal of Semantics 9: 333–77.
Sandt, R. van der and Geurts, B. 1991. ‘Presupposition, anaphora and lexical content’. Technical report, IBM, Wissenschafliches Zentrum, Institut für Wissensbasierte Systeme.
Sapir, E. 1930. Totality. Language Monograph No. 6. Baltimore, MD: Waverly Press (for the Linguistic Society of America).
Sauerland, U. 2004. ‘Scalar implicatures in complex sentences’. Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 367–31.
Saul, J. 2002a. ‘Speaker meaning, what is said and what is implicated’. Noûs 36: 228–48.
Saul, J. 2002b. ‘What is said and psychological reality: Grice's project and relevance theorists’ criticisms’. Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 347–72.
Saussure, L. de. 1998. ‘Portée temporelle de la négation’. Langues 1–1: 25–32.
de Saussure, L. 2000. ‘Quand le temps ne progresse pas avec le passé simple’. Cahiers Chronos 6: 37–48.
de Saussure, L. 2003. Temps et Pertinence. Brussels: De Boeck.
Saussure, L. de and Morency, P. (forthcoming). ‘Remarques sur l'usage interprétatif épistémique du futur’. Travaux neuchâtelois de linguistique.
Saussure, L. de and Sthioul, B. 1999. ‘L’imparfait narratif: point de vue (et images du monde)’. Cahiers de Praxématique 32: 167–88.
Saxe, R. 2006. ‘Uniquely human social cognition’. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 16: 235–9.
Sbisà, M. 1991. ‘Speech acts, effects and responses’. In J. Searle, H. Parret and J. Verschueren (eds.) (On) Searle on Conversation, pp. 101–11. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sbisà, M. 2002. ‘Speech acts in context’. Language and Communication 22: 421–36.
Sbisà, M. 2006. ‘John L. Austin’. In J. Verschueren, J.-O. Östman, J. Blommaert and C. Bulcaen (eds.) Handbook of Pragmatics 1998. Amsterdam: John Benjamins (loose-leaf publication).
Sbisà, M. 2010. ‘Austin, J. L.’. In L. Cummings (ed.) The Pragmatics Encyclopedia, pp. 188–92. London: Routledge.
Schank, R. 1982. Dynamic Memory: A Theory of Reminding and Learning in Computers and People. Cambridge University Press.
Schank, R. and Abelson, R. C. 1977. Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schegloff, E. 1986. ‘The routine as achievement’. Human Studies 9: 111–51.
Schegloff, E. 1987. ‘Between macro and micro: contexts and other connections’. In J. Alexander, B. Giesen, R. Munch and N. Smelser (eds.) The Micro-Macro Link, pp. 207–34. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Schegloff, E. 1991. ‘Reflections on talk and social structure’. In D. Boden and D. Zimmerman (eds.) Talk and Social Structure, pp. 44–70. Oxford: Polity Press.
Schegloff, E. 1995. ‘Discourse as an interactional achievement III: the omnirelevance of action’. Research on Language and Social Interaction 28: 185–211.
Schegloff, E. 1996. ‘Confirming allusions: toward an empirical account of action’. American Journal of Sociology 102: 161–216.
Schegloff, E. 1997. ‘Practices and actions: boundary cases of other-initiated repair’. Discourse Processes 23: 499–545.
Schegloff, E. 1999. ‘Discourse, pragmatics, conversation, analysis’. Discourse Studies 1: 405–35.
Schegloff, E. 2005. ‘On complainability’. Social Problems 52: 449–76.
Schegloff, E. 2006. ‘Interaction: the infrastructure for social institutions, the natural ecological niche for language, and the arena in which culture is enacted’. In N. J. Enfield and S. Levinson (eds.) Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction, pp. 70–96. Oxford: Berg.
Schegloff, E. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge University Press.
Schenkein, J. N. 1972. ‘Towards an analysis of natural conversation and the sense of heheh’. Semiotica 6: 344–77.
Schiffer, S. 1972. Meaning. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Schiffer, S. 1992. ‘Belief ascription’. Journal of Philosophy 89: 499–521.
Schiffer, S. 1996. ‘The hidden-indexical theory's logical-form problem: a rejoinder’. Analysis 56: 92–7.
Schiffrin, D. 1987. Discourse Markers.Cambridge University Press.
Schiffrin, D. 1994. Approaches to Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.
Schlenker, P. 2005. ‘The Lazy Frenchman's approach to the subjunctive’. In T. Geerts, I. van Ginneken and H. Jacobs (eds.) Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2003, pp. 269–309. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Schlenker, P. 2008. ‘Be articulate: a pragmatic theory of presupposition projection’. Theoretical Linguistics 34: 157–212.
Schmerling, S. F. 1976. Aspects of English Sentence Stress. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Schmidt, R. 1980. ‘Review of Esther Goody (ed.) Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction’. Regional English Language Centre (RELC) Journal 11: 100–14.
Schmidtke-Bode, K. 2009. A Typology of Purpose Clauses. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Schmitt, N. 2004. Formulaic Sequences: Acquisition, Processing and Use. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Schneider, K. P. 2008. ‘Small talk in England, Ireland, and the USA’. In K. P. Schneider and A. Barron (eds.) Variatonal Pragmatics: A Focus on Regional Varieties in Pluricentric Languages, pp. 99–139. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Schneider, K. P. and Barron, A. (eds.) 2008a. Variational Pragmatics: A Focus on Regional Varieties in Pluricentric Languages. Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 178. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Schneider, K. P. and Barron, A. 2008b. ‘Where pragmatics and dialectology meet. Introducing variational pragmatics’. In K. P. Schneider and A. Barron (eds.) Variational Pragmatics: A Focus on Regional Varieties in Pluricentric Languages, pp. 1–32. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Scholl, B. and Leslie, A. 1999. ‘Modularity, development and “theory of mind”’. Mind and Language 14: 131–53.
Schubert, L. K. and Pelletier, F. J. 1989. ‘Generically speaking, or using Discourse Representation Theory to interpret generics’. In G. Chierchia, B. H. Partee and R. Turner (eds.) Properties, Types and Meaning, pp. 193–268. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Schulz, K. 2007. Minimal Models in Semantics and Pragmatics: Free Choice, Exhaustivity, and Conditionals. PhD thesis, ILLC, University of Amsterdam.
Schwager, M. 2006. Interpreting Imperatives. PhD thesis, Frankfurt am Main.
Schwenter, S. A. 2000. ‘Viewpoints and polysemy: linking adversative and causal meanings of discourse markers’. In E. Couper-Kuhlen and B. Kortmann (eds.) Cause – Condition – Concession – Contrast: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives, pp. 257–81. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Scollon, R. and Scollon, S. W. 1995. Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
Scollon, R. and Scollon, S. W. 2001. Intercultural Communication. 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Scollon, R. and Scollon, S. W. 2003. Discourse in Place: Language in the Material. World. London and New York: Routledge.
Scott, D. S. 1970. ‘Advice on modal logic’. In K. Lambert (ed.) Philosophical Problems in Logic: Recent Developments, pp. 143–73. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Searle, J. R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. 1975a. ‘A taxonomy of illocutionary acts’. In K. Gunderson (ed.) Language, Mind and Knowledge, pp. 344–69. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Searle, J. R. 1975b. ‘Indirect speech acts’. In P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds.) Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, pp. 59–82. New York: Academic Press.
Searle, J. R. 1978. ‘Literal meaning’. Erkenntnis 13: 207–24.
Searle, J. R. 1979a. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. 1979b. ‘Metaphor’. In J. R. Searle, Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts, pp. 76–116. Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. 1983. Intentionality: An Essay in Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. 1990. ‘Collective intentions and actions’. In P. Cohen, J. Morgan and M. Pollack (eds.) Intentions in Communication, pp. 401–16. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Searle, J. R. 1991. ‘Response: Meaning, intentionality, and speech acts’. In E. Lepore and R. van Gulick (eds.) John Searle and His Critics, pp. 81–102. Oxford: Blackwell.
Searle, J. R. 1992a. ‘How performatives work’. Linguistics and Philosophy 12: 535–58.
Searle, J. R. 1992b. The Rediscovery of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Searle, J. R. 2007. ‘What is language: some preliminary remarks’. In I. Kecskes and L. R. Horn (eds.) Explorations in Pragmatics: Linguistic, Cognitive and Intercultural Aspects, pp. 7–37. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Searle, J. R. and Vanderveken, D. 1985. Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge University Press.
Seddoh, S. 2002. ‘How discrete or independent are “affective” prosody and “linguistic” prosody?’. Aphasiology 16: 683–92.
Seeley, T. 1989. ‘The honey-bee colony as a superorganism’. American Scientist 77: 546–53.
Selinker, L. 1972. ‘Interlanguage’. IRAL 10: 209–31.
Selkirk, E. 1995. ‘Sentence prosody: Intonation, stress and phrasing’. In J. Goldsmith (ed.) Handbook of Phonological Theory, pp. 550–69. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sellars, W. 1962. ‘Truth and correspondence’. Journal of Philosophy 59: 29–56.
Seuren, P. A. M. 1985. Discourse Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Seuren, P. A. M. 2010. The Logic of Language. Oxford University Press.
Seyfarth, R. and Cheney, D. 1992. ‘Meaning and mind in monkeys’. Scientific American 267/6: 78–86.
Sgall, P., Hajičová, E. and Benešova, E. 1973. Topic, Focus, and Generative Semantics. Kronberg: Scriptor Verlag GmbH.
Sgall, P., Hajičová, E. and Panevová, J. 1986. The Meaning of the Sentence in its Semantic and Pragmatic Aspects. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Shatz, M. 1978. ‘On the development of communicative understandings: an early strategy for interpreting and responding to messages’. Cognitive Psychology 10: 271–301.
Shaul, D. L. 2002. Hopi Traditional Literature. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
Sigwart, C. 1873. Logik, I. Tübingen: H. Laupp. (Page references to translation by H. Dendy. London: Swan Sonnenschein and Co., 1895.)
Simon-Vandenbergen, A.-M. 2007. ‘No doubt and related expressions: a functional account’. In M. Hanney and G. J. Steen (eds.) Structural-Functional Studies in English Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Slobin, D. I. 2000. ‘Verbalised events: a dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism’. In S. Niemeier and R. Dirven (eds.) Evidence for Linguistic Relativity, pp. 107–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Slobin, D. I. 2006. ‘What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse and cognition’. In M. Hickmann and S. Robert (eds.) Space in Languages: Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories, pp. 59–81. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Slugowski, B. and Turnbull, W. 1988. ‘Cruel to be kind and kind to be cruel: sarcasm, banter and social relations’. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 7: 101–21.
Small, S. L., Cottrell, G. W. and Tanenhaus, M. K. (eds.) 1988. Lexical Ambiguity Resolution: Perspectives from Psycholinguistics, Neuropsychology, and Artificial Intelligence. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Smet, H. de and Verstraete, J.-C. 2006. ‘Coming to terms with subjectivity’. Cognitive Linguistics 17: 365–92.
Smith, B. and Smith, D. W. 1995. ‘Introduction’. In B. Smith and D. W. Smith (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Husserl, pp. 1–44. Cambridge University Press.
Smith, C. and Erbaugh, M. 2009. ‘Temporal interpretation in Mandarin Chinese’. In R. P. Meier, H. Aristar-Dry and E. Destruel (eds.) Text, Time, and Context: Selected Papers by Carlotta Smith (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 87), pp. 303–42. Dordrecht: Springer.
Smith, C., Perkins, E. and Fernald, T. 2007. ‘Time in Navajo: Direct and indirect interpretation’. International Journal of American Linguistics 73: 40–71.
Smith, N. 1990. ‘Observations on the pragmatics of tense’. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 2: 82–94.
Smith, N. and Tsimpli, I.-M. 1995. The Mind of a Savant: Language Learning and Modularity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Smith, N. J. J. 2008. Vagueness and Degrees of Truth. Oxford University Press.
Smith, S. and Jucker, A. 2002. ‘Discourse markers as turns’. In A. Fetzer and C. Meierkord (eds.) Rethinking Sequentiality: Linguistics meets Conversational Interaction, pp. 151–78. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Snow, C., Perlmann, R., Gleason, J. and Hoosshyar, N. 1990. ‘Developmental perspectives on politeness: sources of children's knowledge’. Journal of Pragmatics 14: 289–305.
Soames, S. 1987. ‘Direct reference, propositional attitudes, and semantic content’. Philosophical Topics 15: 44–87. Reprinted in N. Salmon and S. Soames (eds.) Propositions and Attitudes, pp. 197–239. Oxford University Press.
Soames, S. 1995. ‘Beyond singular propositions?’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 25: 515–49.
Soames, S. 2002. Beyond Rigidity: The Unfinished Semantic Agenda of Naming and Necessity. Oxford University Press.
Solan, L. and Tiersma, P. 2005. Speaking of Crime: The Language of Criminal Justice. University of Chicago Press.
Sommers, F. 1982. The Logic of Natural Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Spenader, J. 2003. ‘Between binding and accommodation’. In P. Kuehlein, H. Rieser and H. Zeevat (eds.) Perspective on Dialogue in the New Millennium, pp. 79–110. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Spencer-Oatey, H. 2000. ‘Rapport management: a framework for analysis’. In H. Spencer-Oatey (ed.) Culturally speaking: Managing Rapport through Talk Across Cultures, pp. 11–46. London: Continuum.
Spencer-Oatey, H. 2005. ‘(Im)politeness, face and perceptions of rapport: unpackaging their bases and interrelationships’. Journal of Politeness Research 1: 95–119.
Spencer-Oatey, H. 2007. ‘Theories of identity and the analysis of face’. Journal of Pragmatics 39: 639–56.
Spencer-Oatey, H. and Ruhi, Ş. 2007. ‘Identity, face and (im)politeness’. Journal of Pragmatics 39: 635–8.
Sperber, D. 1985. ‘Apparently irrational beliefs’. In D. Sperber, On Anthropological Knowledge, pp. 35–63. Cambridge University Press.
Sperber, D. 1996. Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sperber, D. 2002. ‘In defense of massive modularity’. In E. Dupoux (ed.) Language, Brain and Cognitive Development: Essays in Honor of Jacques Mehler, pp. 47–57. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sperber, D. 2007. ‘Seedless grapes: nature and culture’. In S. Laurence and E. Margolis (eds.) Creations of the Mind: Theories of Artifacts and their Representation, pp. 124–37. Oxford University Press.
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1981. ‘Irony and the use–mention distinction’. In P. Cole (ed.) Radical Pragmatics, pp. 295–318. New York: Academic Press.
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1990. ‘Rhetoric and relevance’. In J. Bender and D. Wellbery (eds.) The Ends of Rhetoric, pp. 140–55. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1995a. ‘Postface’. In D. Sperber and D. Wilson, Relevance: Communication and Cognition (2nd edition), pp. 255–79. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1995b. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell. 2nd edition.
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1998a. ‘Irony and relevance’. In R. Carston and S. Uchida (eds.) Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications, pp. 283–93. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1998b. ‘The mapping between the mental and the public lexicon’. In P. Carruthers and J. Boucher (eds.) Language and Thought, pp. 184–200. Cambridge University Press.
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 2002. ‘Pragmatics, modularity and mindreading’. Mind and Language 17: 3–23.
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 2005. ‘Pragmatics’. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 17: 353–88.
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 2008. ‘A deflationary account of metaphors’. In R. Gibbs (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, pp. 84–105. Cambridge University Press.
Spivey-Knowlton, M. and Sedivy, J. 1995. ‘Resolving attachment ambiguities with multiple constraints’. Cognition 55: 227–67.
Srioutai, J. 2004. ‘The Thai c1a: a marker of tense or modality?’. In E. Daskalakiet al. (eds.) Second CamLing Proceedings, pp. 100–7. University of Cambridge.
Stainton, R. J. 2006. Words and Thoughts: Subsentences, Ellipsis, and the Philosophy of Language.Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Stalnaker, R. 1970. ‘Pragmatics’. Synthese 22: 272–89. Reprinted in R. Stalnaker 1999, Context and Content. Oxford University Press.
Stalnaker, R. 1973. ‘Presuppositions’. The Journal of Philosophical Logic 2: 447–57.
Stalnaker, R. 1974. ‘Pragmatic presuppositions’. In M. Munitz and P. Unger (eds.) Semantics and Philosophy, pp. 197–214. New York University Press.
Stalnaker, R. 1978. ‘Assertion’. In P. Cole (ed.) Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatic, pp. 315–32. New York: Academic Press.
Stalnaker, R. 1999. Context and Content: Essays on Intentionality in Speech and Thought. Oxford University Press.
Stalnaker, R. 2004. ‘Assertion revisited, on the interpretation of two-dimensional modal semantics’. Philosophical Studies 118: 299–322.
Stanley, J. 2000. ‘Context and logical form’. Linguistics and Philosophy 23: 391–434.
Stanley, J. 2002a. ‘Making it articulated’. Mind and Language 17: 149–68.
Stanley, J. 2002b. ‘Nominal restriction’. In G. Preyer and G. Peter (eds.) Logical Form and Language, pp. 365–88. Oxford University Press.
Stanley, J. 2005. Knowledge and Practical Interests. Oxford University Press.
Stanley, J. and Szabó, Z. 2000. ‘On quantifier domain restriction’. Mind and Language 15: 219–61.
Stassen, L. 2001. ‘Noun phrase coordination’. In M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Österreicher and W. Raible (eds.) Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook, pp. 1105–11. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Steedman, M. 1991. ‘Structure and intonation’. Language 67: 260–96.
Steedman, M. 2000. ‘Information structure and the syntax–phonology interface’. Linguistic Inquiry 31: 649–89.
Steensig, J. and Drew, P. 2008. ‘Introduction: questioning and affiliation/disaffiliation in interaction’. Discourse Studies 10: 5–15.
Stenström, A.-B., Andersen, G. and Hasund, I. K. 2002. Trends in Teenage Talk: Corpus Compilation, Analysis and Findings. Studies in Corpus Linguistics 8. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Stern, G. 1968. Meaning and Change of Meaning. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. (First published in 1931.)
Stern, J. 2000. Metaphor in Context. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sthioul, B. 2000. ‘Aspect et inferences’. Cahiers de linguistique française 22: 165–87.
Stivers, T. 2008. ‘Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: when nodding is a token of affiliation’. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41: 31–57.
Stivers, T. 2010. ‘An overview of the question-response system in American English conversation’. Journal of Pragmatics 42: 2772–81.
Stockwell, R., SchachterP. and Partee, B. 1973. The Major Structures of English. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Stokke, A. 2009. ‘Intention-sensitive semantics’. Synthese 175: 383–404.
Strawson, P. 1950. ‘On Referring’. Mind 59: 320–44. Reprinted in P. Strawson, Logico-Linguistic Papers, pp. 1–27. London: Methuen, 1971.
Strawson, P. 1952. Introduction to Logical Theory. Methuen.
Strawson, P. 1964a. ‘Identifying reference and truth values’. Theoria 3: 96–118.
Strawson, P. 1964b. ‘Intention and convention in speech acts’. The Philosophical Review 73: 439–60.
Strawson, P. 1971. ‘Meaning and truth’. In P. Strawson, Logico-Linguistic Papers, pp. 131–46. London: Methuen.
Stubbs, M. 1983. Discourse Analysis: The Sociolinguistic Analysis of Natural Language. Oxford: Blackwell.
Stubbs, M. 2001. Words and Phrases: Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sun, J. T.-S. 2007. ‘The irrealis category in rGyalrong’. Language and Linguistics 8: 797–819.
Suzuki, S. (ed.) 2006. Emotive Communication in Japanese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sweetser, E. E. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge University Press.
Swinney, D. 1979. ‘Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (re)consideration of context effects’. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18: 645–60.
Szabó, Z. G. 2000. ‘Compositionality as supervenience’. Linguistics and Philosophy 23: 475–505.
Taavitsainen, I. and Fitzmaurice, S. 2007. ‘Historical pragmatics: what it is and how to do it’. In S. M. Fitzmaurice and I. Taavitsainen (eds.) Methodological Issues in Historical Pragmatics, pp. 11–36. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Taavitsainen, I. and Jucker, A. H. 2010. ‘Trends and developments in historical pragmatics’. In A. H. Jucker and I. Taavitsainen (eds.) Handbook of Historical Pragmatics. (Handbooks of Pragmatics 8), pp. 3–30. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Taavitsainen, I. and Pahta, P. (eds.) 2004. Medical and Scientific Writing in Late Medieval English. Studies in English Language. Cambridge University Press.
Talmy, L. 1985. ‘Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms’. In T. Shopen (ed.) Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. iii, pp. 57–149. Cambridge University Press.
Talmy, L. 1996. ‘The windowing of attention in language’. In M. Shibatani and S. Thompson (eds.) Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning, pp. 235–87. Oxford University Press.
Talmy, L. 2000. Toward A Cognitive Semantics, vol. i. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Talmy, L. 2006. ‘The representation of spatial structure in spoken and signed language’. In M. Hickman and S. Robert (eds.) Space in Languages: Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories, pp. 207–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Talwar, V. and Gordon, H. M. 2007. ‘Lying in the elementary school years: verbal deception and its relation to second-order belief understanding’. Developmental Psychology 43: 804–10.
Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M. and Sedivy, J. C. 1995. ‘Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension’. Science 268: 1632–4.
Tannen, D. 1985. ‘Cross-cultural communication’. In T. A. van Dijk (ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis, vol. iv, pp. 203–15. London: Academic Press.
Tannen, D. 1993a. Gender and Conversational Interaction. Oxford University Press.
Tannen, D. (ed.) 1993b. Framing in Discourse. Oxford University Press.
Tannen, D. 2005. ‘Interactional sociolinguistics as a resource for intercultural pragmatics’. Intercultural Pragmatics 2: 205–8.
Tannen, D. and Kakava, C. 1992. ‘Power and solidarity in Modern Greek conversation: disagreeing to agree’. Journal of Modern Greek Studies 10: 11–34.
Tartter, V. C., Gomes, H., Dubrovsky, B., Molholm, S. and Vala Stewart, R. 2002. ‘Novel metaphors appear anomalous at least momentarily: evidence from N400’. Brain and Language 80: 488–509.
Tasmowski-DeRyck, L. 1985. ‘L’imparfait avec et sans rupture’. Langue française 67: 59–77.
Tendahl, M. and Gibbs, R. 2008. ‘Complementary perspectives on metaphor: cognitive linguistics and relevance theory’. Journal of Pragmatics 40: 1823–64.
Terkourafi, M. 2002. ‘Politeness and formulaicity: evidence from Cypriot Greek’. Journal of Greek Linguistics 3: 179–201.
Terkourafi, M. 2003. ‘Generalized and particularized implicatures of politeness’. In P. Kühnlein, H. Rieser and H. Zeevat (eds.) Perspectives on Dialogue in the New Millennium, pp. 151–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Terkourafi, M. 2004. ‘Testing Brown and Levinson's theory in a corpus of conversational data from Cypriot Greek’. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 168: 119–34.
Terkourafi, M. 2005. ‘Beyond the micro-level in politeness research’. Journal of Politeness Research 1: 237–62.
Terkourafi, M. 2006. ‘Review of Watts, Richard, Politeness’. Journal of Pragmatics 38: 418–28.
Terkourafi, M. 2007. ‘Toward a universal notion of face for a universal notion of co-operation’. In I. Kecskes and L. Horn (eds.) Explorations in Pragmatics: Linguistic, Cognitive and Intercultural Aspects, pp. 313–44. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Terkourafi, M. 2008. ‘Toward a unified theory of politeness, impoliteness, and rudeness’. In D. Bousfield and M. Locher (eds.) Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, pp. 45–74. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Terkourafi, M. 2009a. ‘Finding face between Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft: Greek perceptions of the in-group’. In M. Haugh and F. Bargiela-Chiappini (eds.) Face, Communication, and Social Interaction, pp. 269–88. London: Equinox.
Terkourafi, M. 2009b. ‘On de-limiting context’. In A. Bergs and G. Diewald (eds.) Context and Constructions, pp. 17–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Terkourafi, M. 2009c. ‘What use is what is said’. In P. De Brabanter and M. Kissine (eds.) Utterance Interpretation and Cognitive Models, pp. 27–58. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
Terkourafi, M. 2011. ‘From Politeness 1 to Politeness 2: Tracking norms of im/politeness across time and space’. Journal of Politeness Research, 7: 159–85.
Terkourafi, M. (forthcoming). From Politeness to Impoliteness: The Frame-based Approach. Cambridge University Press.
Thomas, J. 1983. ‘Cross-cultural pragmatic failure’. Applied Linguistics 4(2): 91–112.
Thomason, R. H. 1992. ‘Accommodation, meaning, and implicature: interdisciplinary foundations for pragmatics’. In P. Cohen, J. Morgan and M. E. Pollack (eds.) Intentions in Communication, pp. 325–63. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Thompson, G. and Zhou, J. 2000. ‘Evaluation and organization in text: the structuring role of evaluative disjuncts’. In S. Hunston and G. Thompson (eds.) Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, pp. 121–41. Oxford University Press.
Thompson, S. A. 1990. ‘Information flow and dative shift in English discourse’. In J. A. Edmondson, C. Feagin and P. Mühlhäusler (eds.) Development and Diversity: Language Variation Across Time and Space (Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington Publications in Linguistics 93), pp. 239–53. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics and University of Texas at Arlington.
Thompson, S. A. and Mulac, A. 1991. ‘A quantitative perspective on the grammaticization of epistemic parentheticals in English’. In E. Traugott and B. Heine (eds.) Approaches to Grammaticalization, pp. 313–27. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Tindale, C. W. 2010. ‘Rhetoric’. In L. Cummings (ed.) The Pragmatics Encyclopedia, pp. 403–4. London: Routledge.
Ting-Toomey, S. 1999. Communicating Across Cultures. New York/London: The Guilford Press.
Tirassa, M. 1999. ‘Communicative competence and the architecture of the mind/brain’. Brain and Language 68: 419–41.
Tobler, A. 1921. ‘Il ne faut que tu meurs; “du darfst nicht sterben”’. In Vermischte Beitrage zur französisichen Grammatik, vol. iii, pp. 78–111. Leipzig: Hirzel, 2nd edition (first published 1882).
Tomasello, M. and Call, J. 1997. Primate Cognition. Oxford University Press.
Tomasello, M. and Rakoczy, H. 2003. ‘What makes human cognition unique? From individual to shared to collective intentionality’. Mind and Language 18: 121–47.
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T. and Moll, H. 2005. ‘Understanding and sharing intentions: the origins of cultural cognition’. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 28: 675–735.
Torres Cacoullos, R. and Walker, J. A. 2009. ‘The present of the English future: grammatical variation and collocations in discourse’. Language 85: 321–54.
Tracy, K. 1990. ‘The many faces of facework’. In H. Giles and P. Robinson (eds.) The Handbook of Language and Social Psychology, pp. 209–26. Chichester: Wiley.
Tracy, K. 2008. ‘Reasonable hostility: Situation-appropriate face-attack’. Journal of Politeness Research 4: 169–91.
Tracy, K. and Tracy, S. 1998. ‘Rudeness at 911: reconceptualizing face and face-attack’. Human Communication Research 25: 225–51.
Traugott, E. 1982. ‘From propositional to textual and expressive meanings: some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization’. In W. P. Lehmann and Y. Malkiel (eds.) Perspectives on Historical Linguistics, pp. 245–71. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Traugott, E. 1989. ‘On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: an example of subjectification in semantic change’. Language 65: 31–55.
Traugott, E. 1995. ‘Subjectification in grammaticalization’. In D. Stein and S. Wright (eds.) Subjectivity and Subjectivisation, pp. 31–54. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Traugott, E. 2004. ‘Historical pragmatics’. In L. Horn and G. Ward (eds.) The Handbook of Pragmatics, pp. 538–61. Oxford: Blackwell.
Traugott, E. 2008a. ‘“All that he endeavoured to prove was…”: on the emergence of grammatical constructions in dialogic contexts’. In R. Cooper and R. Kempson (eds.) Language in Flux: Dialogue Coordination, Language Variation, Change and Evolution, pp. 143–77. London: King's College Publications.
Traugott, E. 2008b. ‘The state of English language studies: a linguistic perspective’. In M. Thormählen (ed.) English Now: Selected Papers from the 20th IAUPE Conference in Lund 2007, pp. 199–225. Lund Studies in English.
Traugott, E. 2010. ‘Revisiting subjectification and intersubjectification’. In K. Davidse, L. Vandelanotte and H. Cuyckens (eds.) Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, pp. 29–71. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Traugott, E. and Dasher, R. B. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge University Press.
Traugott, E. and Heine, B. (eds.) 1991. Approaches to Grammaticalization. 2 vols. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Traugott, E. and König, E. 1991. ‘The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited’. In E. Traugott and B. Heine (eds.) Approaches to Grammaticalization, vol. i, pp. 189–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Travis, C. 1975. Saying and Understanding. Oxford: Blackwell.
Travis, C. 1997. ‘Pragmatics’. In B. Hale and C. Wright (eds.) A Companion to the Philosophy of Language, pp. 87–107. Oxford: Blackwell.
Travis, C. 2006. ‘Psychologism’. In E. Lepore and B. C. Smith (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language, pp. 103–26. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Travis, C. 2008. Occasion-Sensitivity: Selected Essays. Oxford University Press.
Trosborg, A. 1995. Interlanguage Pragmatics: Requests, Complaints and Apologies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Truss, L. 2005. Talk to the Hand: The Utter Bloody Rudeness of the World Today, or Six Good Reasons to Stay Home and Bolt the Door. London: Profile.
Tuggy, D. 1993. ‘Ambiguity, polysemy and vagueness’. Cognitive Linguistics 4: 273–91.
Tuomela, R. 2005. ‘We-intentions revisited’. Philosophical Studies 125: 327–69.
Tuomela, R. and Miller, K. 1988. ‘We-intentions’. Philosophical Studies 53: 367–89.
Turner, K. 1996. ‘The principal principles of pragmatic inference: Politeness’. Language Teaching 29: 1–13.
Turner, K. (ed.) 1999. The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View. Oxford: Elsevier.
Uhlig, G. (ed.) 1883. Grammatici Graeci. Leipzig: Teubner.
Underwood, G., Schmitt, N. and Galpin, A. 2004. ‘The eyes have it: an eye-movement study into the processing of formulaic sequences’. In N. Schmitt (ed.) Formulaic Sequences: Acquisition, Processing and Use, pp. 153–72. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Usami, M. 2002. Discourse Politeness in Japanese Conversation: Some Implications for a Universal Theory of Politeness. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.
Vallduví, E. 1992. The Informational Component. New York: Garland.
Vallduví, E. and Vilkuna, M. 1998. ‘On rheme and kontrast’. In P. Cullicover and L. McNally (eds.) The Limits of Syntax, pp. 79–108. New York: Academic Press.
Van Lancker, D. 2009. ‘Formulaic and novel language in a “dual process” model of language competence’. In R. Corrigan, E. A. Moravcsik, H. Ouali and K. M. Wheatley (eds.) Formulaic Language, vol. ii: Acquisition, Loss, Psychological Reality, and Functional Explanations, pp. 445–70. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Van Lancker, D., Canter, G. J. and Terbeek, D. 1981. ‘Disambiguation of ditropic sentences: acoustic and phonetic cues’. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 24: 330–5.
Van linden, A. 2009. Dynamic, Deontic and Evaluative Adjectives and their Clausal Complement Patterns: A Synchronic-diachronic Account. Doctoral dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
Van Valin, R. 2006. Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge University Press.
Vandeloise, C. 2003. ‘Containment, support and linguistic relativity’. In H. Cuykens, R. Dirven and J. Taylor (eds.) Cognitive Approaches to Lexical Semantics, pp. 393–425. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Vandeliose, C. 2006. ‘Are there spatial prepositions?’. In M. Hickman and S. Robert (eds.) Space in Languages: Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories, pp. 149–54. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Vandepitte, S. 1989. ‘A pragmatic function of intonation’. Lingua 79: 265–97.
Vandewinkel, S. and Davidse, K. 2008. ‘The interlocking paths of development to emphasizer adjective pure’. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 9: 255–87.
Vega Moreno, R. 2007. Creativity and Convention: The Pragmatics of Everyday Figurative Speech. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Velleman, D. 1997. ‘How to share an intention’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57: 29–50.
Veltman, F. 1996. ‘Defaults in update semantics’. Journal of Philosophical Logic 25: 221–61.
Vendler, Z. 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Verschueren, J. 1999. Understanding Pragmatics. Understanding Language Series. London: Arnold.
Verschueren, J., Östman, J.-O., Blommaert, J. and Bulcaen, C. (eds.) 2003. Handbook of Pragmatics Online. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Verstraete, J.-C. 2005. ‘The semantics and pragmatics of composite mood marking: non-Pama-Nyungan languages of northern Australia’. Linguistic Typology 9: 223–68.
Vigliocco, G., Meteyard, L., Andrews, M. and Kousta, S. 2009. ‘Toward a theory of semantic representation’. Language and Cognition 1: 219–47.
Visconti, J. 2006. ‘The role of lexical semantics in semantic change’. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 38: 207–34.
Vu, H., Kellas, G. and Paul, S. T. 1998. ‘Sources of sentence constraint on lexical ambiguity resolution’. Memory and Cognition 26: 979–1001.
Vu, H., Kellas, G., Metcalf, K. and Herman, R. 2000. ‘The influence of global discourse on lexical ambiguity resolution’. Memory and Cognition 28: 236–52.
Walter, H., Adenzato, M., Ciaramidaro, A., Enrici, I., Pia, L. and Bara, B. 2004. ‘Understanding intentions in social interaction: the role of the anterior paracingulate cortex’. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16: 1854–63.
Waltereit, R. 2006. ‘The rise of discourse particles: a specific type of language change’. In K. Fischer (ed.) Approaches to Discourse Particles, pp. 61–76. Oxford: Elsevier.
Waltereit, R. and Detges, U. 2007. ‘Different functions, different histories. Modal particles and discourse markers from a diachronic point of view’. In M. Cuenca (ed.) Contrastive Perspectives on Discourse Markers, pp. 61–80. Special issue of Journal of Catalan Linguistics 6.
Ward, G. 1990. ‘The discourse functions of VP preposing’. Language 66: 742–63.
Ward, G. and Hirschberg, J. 1988. ‘Intonation and propositional attitude: the pragmatics of L*+H L H%’. In J. Powers and K. J. de Jong (eds.) Proceedings of the Fifth Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, pp. 512–22. Columbus: Ohio State University Department of Linguistics.
Warner, A. 1990. ‘Reworking the history of English auxiliaries’. In S. Adamson, V. Law, N. Vincent and S. Wright (eds.) Papers from the 5th International Conference of English Historical Linguistics, pp. 537–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Warner, A. 1993. English Auxiliaries: Structure and History. Cambridge University Press.
Watts, R. 1989. ‘Relevance and relational work: Linguistic politeness as politic behaviour’. Multilingua 8: 131–66.
Watts, R. J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge University Press.
Watts, R., Ide, S. and Ehlich, K. 1992/2005. ‘Introduction’. In R. Watts, S. Ide and K. Ehlich (eds.) Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice (2nd edition), pp. 1–17. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
WDS 1942. Webster's Dictionary of Synonyms. Springfield, MA: G. C. Merriam Co.
Wearing, C. 2006. ‘Metaphor and what is said’. Mind and Language 21: 310–32.
Webster, N. 2002. Webster's Third New International Dictionary of the English Language, Unabridged. Ed. P. B. Gove. Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.
Weiner, M. 2006. ‘Are all conversational implicatures cancellable?’. Analysis 66: 127–30.
Weinreich, U. 1962. ‘Lexicographic definition in descriptive semantics’. In F. W. Householder and S. Saporta (eds.) Problems in Lexicography, pp. 25–43. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Weinreich, U. 1966. ‘Explorations in semantic theory’. In T. A. Sebeok (ed.) Current Trends in Linguistics 3. The Hague: Mouton. Reprinted in W. Labov and B. S. Weinreich (eds.) 1980, Weinreich on Semantics, pp. 99–201. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Welman, J. B. 1948. Preliminary Survey of the Freshwater Fishes of Nigeria. Lagos: Government Printer.
Westerståhl, D. (forthcoming). ‘Compositionality in Kaplan Style Semantics’. In W. Hinzen, E. Machery and M. Werning (eds.) The Handbook of Compositionality. Oxford University Press.
Wharton, T. 2003a. ‘Interjections, language and the “showing”/“saying” continuum’. Pragmatics and Cognition 11: 39–91.
Wharton, T. 2003b. ‘Natural pragmatics and natural codes’. Mind and Language 18: 447–77.
Wharton, T. 2008. ‘Gricean intentions and relevance-theoretic intentions’. Intercultural Pragmatics 5: 131–52.
Wharton, T. 2009. Pragmatics and Non-Verbal Communication. Cambridge University Press.
Whitehead, A. N. and Russell, B. 1910. Principia Mathematica, vol. i. Cambridge University Press.
Wichmann, A. 2002. ‘Attitudinal intonation and the inferential process’. In B. Bel and I. Marlien (eds.) Proceedings of the Speech Prosody Conference, pp. 11–16. Denver, CO.
Wichmann, A. and Blakemore, D. (eds.) 2006. ‘Prosody and pragmatics’. Special issue of Journal of Pragmatics 38 (10).
Widdowson, H. 2004. Text, Context, and Pretext: Critical Issues in Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wierzbicka, A. 1985. ‘Different cultures, different languages, different speech acts’. Journal of Pragmatics 9: 145–78.
Wierzbicka, A. 1991. Cross-cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Wierzbicka, A. 2006. ‘On folk conceptions of mind, agency and morality’. Journal of Cognition and Culture 6: 165–79.
Wilkins, D. 2006. ‘Towards an Arrernte grammar of space’. In S. Levinson and D. Wilkins (eds.) Grammars of Space, pp. 24–62. Cambridge University Press.
Williamson, T. 1994. Vagueness. London: Routledge.
Williamson, T. 2009. ‘Reference, inference, and the semantics of pejoratives’. In J. Almog and P. Leonardi (eds.) Philosophy of David Kaplan, pp. 137–58. Oxford University Press.
Wilson, D. 1992. ‘Reference and relevance’. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 4: 165–91.
Wilson, D. 2006. ‘The pragmatics of verbal irony: echo or pretence?’. Lingua 116: 1722–43.
Wilson, D. 2009a. ‘Parallels and differences in the treatment of metaphor in relevance theory and cognitive linguistics’. Studies in Pragmatics (Journal of the Pragmatics Society of Japan) 11: 42–60. Revised version 2010, in UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 22.
Wilson, D. 2009b. ‘Irony and metarepresentation’. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 21: 183–226.
Wilson, D. and
Carston, R. 2006. ‘
Metaphor, relevance and the “emergent property” issue’.
Mind and Language 21:
404–33. Revised version 2007, in
The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication, 3 (A Figure of Speech).
http://thebalticyearbook.org/journals/baltic/issue/view/2.
Wilson, D. and Carston, R. 2007. ‘A unitary approach to lexical pragmatics: relevance, inference and ad hoc concepts’. In N. Burton-Roberts (ed.) Pragmatics, pp. 230–59. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 1979. ‘Ordered entailments: An alternative to presuppositional theories’. In C.-K. Oh and D. A. Dinneen (eds.) Syntax and Semantics 11: Presupposition, pp. 299–323. New York: Academic Press.
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 1986. ‘Inference and implicature’. In C. Travis (ed.) Meaning and Interpretation, pp. 45–75. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 1988. ‘Mood and the analysis of non-declarative sentences’. In J. Dancy, J. M. Moravcsik and C. C. W. Taylor (eds.) Human Agency, Language, Duty and Value: Philosophical Essays in Honour of J. O. Urmson, pp. 77–101. Stanford University Press.
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 1992. ‘On verbal irony’. Lingua 87: 53–76. Reprinted in R. Gibbs and H. Colston (eds.) 2007, Irony in Language and Thought: A Cognitive Science Reader, pp. 35–55. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 1993a. ‘Linguistic form and relevance’. Lingua 90: 1–25.
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 1993b. ‘Pragmatics and time’. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 5: 277–300.
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 2002. ‘Truthfulness and relevance’. Mind 111/442: 583–632.
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 2004. ‘Relevance theory’. In L. Horn and G. Ward (eds.) The Handbook of Pragmatics, pp. 607–32. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wilson, D. and Wharton, T. 2006. ‘Relevance and prosody’. Journal of Pragmatics 38: 1559–79.
Winch, P. 1997. ‘Can we understand ourselves?’. Philosophical Investigations 20: 193–204.
Winner, E. 1988. The Point of Words: Children's Understanding of Metaphor and Irony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Winner, E. and Gardner, H. 1993. ‘Metaphor and irony: two levels of understanding’. In A. Ortony (ed.) Metaphor and Thought, pp. 425–43. Cambridge University Press.
Winner, E. and Leekam, S. R. 1991. ‘Distinguishing irony from deception: understanding the speaker's second-order intention’. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 9: 257–70.
Witek, M. 2009. ‘Skepticism about reflexive intentions refuted’. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 5: 69–83.
Wittgenstein, L. 1953. Philosophische Untersuchungen. Oxford: Blackwell. English translation Philosophical Investigations, 1953. Oxford: Blackwell. Reprinted 2003 as Philosophical Investigations: The German Text, with a Revised English Translation. 3rd edition. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, L. 1969. Philosophische Grammatik. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt. English translation Philosophical Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell, 1974.
Wittgenstein, L. 2001. Philosophical Investigations. 3rd edition. Oxford/Malden: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Woodfield, A. 1994. ‘Intentionality’. In R. E. Asher (ed.) The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, vol. iv, pp. 1705–9. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Woods, J. 2010. ‘Inference’. In L. Cummings (ed.) The Pragmatics Encyclopedia, pp. 218–20. London: Routledge.
Wray, A. 2002. Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge University Press.
Wray, A. 2008. Formulaic Language: Pushing the Boundaries. Oxford University Press.
Xrakovski, V. S. (ed.) 2001. Typology of Imperative Constructions. Munich: Lincolm.
Yap, F. H., Matthews, S. and Horie, K. 2004. ‘From pronominalizer to pragmatic marker: implications for unidirectionality from a cross-linguistic perspective’. In O. Fischer, M. Norde and H. Perridon (eds.) Up and Down the Cline: The Nature of Grammaticalization, pp. 137–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Zeevat, H. 1992. ‘Presupposition and accommodation in update semantics’. Journal of Semantics 9: 379–412.
Zeevat, H. 1997. ‘The common ground as a dialogue parameter’. In G. Jäger and A. Benz (eds.) Proceedings Mundial 1997, pp. 195–214. Munich: CIS.
Zeevat, H. 2007. ‘Exhaustivity, questions and plurals in update semantics’. In M. Aloni, A. Butler and P. Dekker (eds.) Questions in Dynamic Semantics, pp. 161–92. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Zeevat, H. 2009. Optimal Interpretation as an Alternative to Gricean Pragmatics: Structuring Information in Discourse; the Explicit/Implicit Dimension. Oslo: OSLA.
Zimmermann, T. E. 2001. ‘Free choice disjunction and epistemic possibility’. Natural Language Semantics 8: 255–90.
Zipf, G. K. 1949. Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Ziv, Y. 1982. ‘Getting more mileage out of existentials in English’. Linguistics 20: 747–62.
Zwicky, A. and Sadock, J. 1975. ‘Ambiguity tests and how to fail them’. In J. P. Kimball (ed.) Syntax and Semantics 4, pp. 1–35. New York: Academic Press.
