Cicero: De Natura Deorum Book I
-
Select format
-
- Publisher:
- Cambridge University Press
- Publication date:
- 05 June 2012
- 31 July 2003
- ISBN:
- 9780511803628
- 9780521006309
- Dimensions:
- Weight & Pages:
- Dimensions:
- (186 x 123 mm)
- Weight & Pages:
- 0.27kg, 248 Pages
You may already have access via personal or institutional login
Show more authors 
You may already have access via personal or institutional login
Book description
Book 1 of De Natura Deorum exhibits in a nutshell Cicero's philosophical method, with the prior part stating the case for Epicurean theology, the latter (rather longer) part refuting it. Thus the reader observes Cicero at work in both constructive and skeptical modes as well as his art of characterizing speakers. Prefaced to the Book is Cicero's most elaborate justification of his philosophical writing. The Book thus makes an ideal starting point for the study of Cicero's philosophica or indeed of any philosophical writing in Latin, since it delineates the problems such a project raised in the minds of Roman readers and shows how Cicero thought they could be met. There is also a systematic and detailed doxography of ancient views about the deity, an important document in itself, presented from an Epicurean perspective. The volume's Introduction situates this text within Cicero's intellectual development and ancient reflection about the gods.
Reviews
'The commentary is in general outstanding. I hope it leads to an increase of interest in this work and in Cicero's philosophical writings as a whole'
Source: Hermathena
Contents
Contents
References
Standard commentaries on other texts are cited by the name of the commentator (e.g. “Powell on Sen. 3”) and are omitted from this list
(1978). “Conventions of naming in Cicero,” CQ 72: 145–66
(1973). “M. T. Cicero, Sprache und Stil,” Paulys Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft (ed.) G. Wissowa, W. Kroll, K. Mittelhaus, K. Ziegler. 83 vols. Stuttgart 1893–Munich 1978. Suppl. XIII: 1237.49–1347.7
Algra, K. (1999). “The beginnings of cosmology,” in (ed.) Long (1999) 45–65
(2001). “Comments or commentary? Zeno of Citium and Hesiod's Theogonia,” Mnemosyne 54: 562–81
Algra, K. et al., ed. (1999). The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge
André, J.-M. (1966). L'otium dans la vie morale et intellectuelle romaine. Paris
, and (1979). “I frammenti di Zenone Sidonio,” CErc. 9: 47–133
Arnim, H. von (1931). “Die Entstehung der Gotteslehre des Aristoteles,” SBAW, Philos.-hist. Klasse 212.5. Vienna
(1961). “Filodemo, De dis III col. XI–XIII 20,” SCO 10: 112–21
Asmis, E. (1984). Epicurus' Scientific Method. Ithaca and London
(1985). “Appunti sul pensiero teologico dei primi maestri epicurei,” Vichiana 14: 235–40
(1991). “Le livre I du De natura deorum et le traité De signis de Philodème: Problèmes de théologie et de logique,” REL 69: 51–62
Babut, D. (1972). “Le divin et les dieux dans la pensée d'Anaximandre,” REG 85: 1–32
Babut, D. (1975). “Simonide moraliste,” REG 88: 20–62
Bailey, C. (1928). The Greek Atomists: a Study. Oxford
Baltes, M. (2000). “Zur Nachwirkung des Satzes τὸ μακάριον καὶ ἄΦθαρτον οὔτ∊ αὐτὸ πράγματα ἔχ∊ι …,” in (ed.) M. Erler, Epikureismus in der späten Republik und der Kaiserzeit, 93–108. Stuttgart
Barnes, J. (1985). “Cicero's de Fato and a Greek Source,” in (ed.) J. Brunschwig, C. Imbert, and A. Roger, Histoire et structure. A la mémoire de Victor Goldschmidt, 229–39. Paris
Barnes, J. (1989). “Antiochus of Ascalon,” in (ed.) M. Griffin and J. Barnes, Philosophia Togata: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society, 51–96. Oxford
Beard, M. (1986). “Cicero and divination: the formation of a Latin discourse,” JRS 76: 33–46
Beard, M. (1990). “Priesthood in the Roman Republic,” in (ed.) M. Beard and J. North, Pagan Priests, 17–48. Ithaca
Beard, M., et al. (1998). Religions of Rome. 2 vols. Cambridge
Bignone, E. (1936). L'Aristotele perduto e la formazione filosofica di Epicuro. Florence
Birt, T. (1918). “Kritische Bemerkungen zu Cicero De deorum natura, Buch I,” BphW 38: 546–52 and 569–76
Blümner, H. (1911). Die römischen Privataltertümer. Munich
Bobzien, S. (1998). Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford
Bollack, J. (1975). La pensée du plaisir. Paris
Bollack, J., and A. Laks, ed. (1976). Etudes sur l'Epicurisme antique, Cahiers de philologie 1. Lille
Bonitz, H. (1870). Index Aristotelicus. Berlin
Bonniec, H. (1984). “L'exploitation apologétique par Arnobe du ‘de natura deorum’ de Cicéron,” in (ed.) R. Chevallier, Présence de Cicéron, 89–101. Paris
Bos, A. P. (1988). “A double theology in Aristotle De Philosophia fr. 26 Ross,” Prudentia 20.2: 43–64 = Cosmic and Meta-cosmic Theology in Aristotle's Lost Dialogues, ch. 14. Leiden 1989
Boyancé, P. (1975). “L'éloge de la philosophie dans le De legibus I, 58–62,” Ciceroniana n.s. 2: 21–40
Brittain, C. (2001). Philo of Larissa: the Last of the Academic Sceptics. Oxford
Brunschwig, J. (1964). Review of Kleve (1963), REG 77: 352–6
Bruwaene, M. van den (1937). La théologie de Cicéron. Louvain
Burkert, W. (1972). Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism. Tr. E. L. Minar, Jr. Cambridge, MA
Burkert, W. (1979). Structure and History in Greek Mythology and Ritual. Berkeley
Burkert, W. (1985). Greek Religion. Tr. John Raffan. Cambridge, MA
Burkert, W. (1987). Ancient Mystery Cults. Cambridge, MA
Burkert, W. (1996). The Creation of the Sacred. Cambridge, MA
Burnet, J. (1964; orig. 1914). Greek Philosophy. New York
Burnyeat, M. F. (1980). “Can the Sceptic live his scepticism?,” in (ed.) M. Schofield, M. Burnyeat, J. Barnes, Doubt and Dogmatism: Studies in Hellenistic Epistemology, 20–53. Oxford
Cherniss, H. F. (1944). Aristotle's Criticism of Plato and the Academy. Vol. I. Baltimore
Classen, C. J. (1987). “Maledicta, contumeliae, tum iracundiae … indignae philosophia,” Perspektiven der Philosophie. Neues Jahrbuch 13: 317–29
Clay, D. (1983). Lucretius and Epicurus. Ithaca
Clay, D. (1986). “The cults of Epicurus,” CErc 16: 11–28
Coleman, R. (1960). “Cicero De Natura Deorum I 65 and the Stoic criticism of the atomic theory,” Mnemosyne 4: 34–8
Collins, A. (1713). A Discourse of Free Thinking: Occasion'd by the Rise and Growth of a Sect Call'd Free-thinkers. London
Corbeill, A. (1996). Controlling Laughter: Political Humor in the Late Roman Republic. Princeton
Corbett, P. (1986). The Scurra. Edinburgh
Couissin, P. (1983). “The Stoicism of the New Academy,” in (ed.) M. Burnyeat, The Skeptical Tradition, 31–63. Berkeley
Courtney, E. (1993). The Fragmentary Latin Poets. Oxford
Crönert, W. (1906). Kolotes und Menedemos. Munich
Cropp, P. (1909). ‘De auctoribus quos secutus Cicero in libris De natura deorum Academicorum novorum theologiam reddidit.’ Göttingen Diss. Hamburg
De Lacy, P. (1941). “Cicero's invective against Piso,” TAPhA 72: 49–58
De Lacy, P. H. and E. A. (1978). Philodemus: on Methods of Inference. Rev. ed. Naples
Dickey, E. (1997). “Me autem nomine appellabat: avoidance of Cicero's name in his dialogues,” CQ 47: 584–8
Dickey, E. (2002). Latin Forms of Address from Plautus to Apuleius. Oxford
Dihle, A. (1977). “Das Satyrspiel ‘Sisyphos’,” Hermes 105: 28–42
Dörrie, H., and M. Baltes (1987–98). Der Platonismus in der Antike. 5 vols. Stuttgart
Dover, K. J. (1975). “The freedom of the intellectual in Greek society,” Talanta 7: 24–54 = Collected Papers. Vol. II: 135–58. Oxford 1988
Drachmann, A. B. (1922) Atheism in Pagan Antiquity. London
Düring, I. (1966). Aristoteles. Darstellung und Interpretation seines Denkens. Heidelberg
Dyck, A. R. (1998). “Narrative obfuscation, philosophical topoi, and tragic patterning in Cicero's Pro Milone,” HSPh 98: 219–41
Effe, B. (1970). Studien zur Kosmologie und Theologie der Aristotelischen Schrift ‘Über die Philosophie’. Munich
Englert, W. (1990). “Bringing philosophy to the light: Cicero's Paradoxa Stoicorum,” Apeiron 23: 117–42
Ernesti, J. C. G. (1797). Lexicon technologiae Latinorum rhetoricae. Leipzig
Fahr, W. (1969). θ∊οὺς νομίζ∊ιν. Zum Problem der Anfänge des Atheismus bei den Griechen. Hildesheim
Fladerer, L. (1996). Antiochos von Askalon. Hellenist und Humanist. Graz-Horn
Flashar, H., ed. (1994). Die Hellenistische Philosophie. 2 vols. Basle
Fögen, T. (2000). Patrii sermonis egestas. Einstellungen lateinischer Autoren zu ihrer Muttersprache. Leipzig
Fowler, D. (1983). “Lucretius on the clinamen and ‘free will’ (II 251–93),” in Συζήτησις. Studi sull' Epicureismo greco e romano offerti a Marcello Gigante. Vol. I: 329–52. Naples
Fraenkel, E. (1968). Leseproben aus Reden Ciceros und Catos. Rome
Fränkel, H. (1975). Early Greek Poetry and Philosophy. Tr. M. Hadas and J. Willis. Oxford
Frank, H. (1992). Ratio bei Cicero. Frankfurt am Main
Frazel, T. D. (1998). ‘Cicero's Verrines and Roman rhetorical culture’. UCLA Diss. Los Angeles
Freyburger, G. (1986). Fides. Etude sémantique et religieuse depuis les origines jusqu' à l'époque augustienne. Paris
Frischer, B. D. (1982). The Sculpted Word: Epicureanism and Philosophical Recruitment in Ancient Greece. Berkeley
Fritz, K. von (1954). The Theory of the Mixed Constitution in Antiquity. New York
Fritz, K. von (1964). “Der Nous des Anaxagoras,” Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 9: 87–102
Furley, D. (1987). The Greek Cosmologists. Vol. I. Cambridge
Furley, D. (1993). “Democritus and Epicurus on sensible qualities,” in (ed.) J. Brunschwig and M. C. Nussbaum, Passions and Perceptions: Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind, 72–94. Cambridge
Gale, M. (1994). Myth and Poetry in Lucretius. Cambridge
Garnsey, P. (1970). Social Status and Legal Privilege in the Roman Empire. Oxford
Gawlick, G. (1963). “Cicero and the Enlightenment,” Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century 25: 657–82
Gelzer, M. (1969). Cicero. Ein biographischer Versuch. Wiesbaden
Glucker, J. (1978). Antiochus and the Late Academy. Göttingen
Glucker, J. (1984). “Chapter and verse in Cicero,” Grazer Beiträge 11: 103–12
Glucker, J. (1997). “Socrates in the Academic Books and other Ciceronian works,” in (ed.) B. Inwood and J. Mansfeld, Assent and Argument: Studies in Cicero's Academic Books, 58–88. Leiden
Goehling, G. (1875). ‘De Cicerone artis aestimatore’. Diss. Halle
Görler, W. (1992). “Ein sprachlicher Zufall und seine Folgen. ‘Wahrscheinliches’ bei Karneades und bei Cicero,” in (ed.) C. W. Müller, K. Sier, J. Werner, Zum Umgang mit fremden Sprachen in der griechisch-römischen Antike, 159–70. Stuttgart
Görler, W. (1995). “Silencing the troublemaker: De legibus 1.39 and the continuity of Cicero's scepticism,” in (ed.) Powell (1995a) 85–113
Görler, W. (1997). “Cicero's philosophical stance in the Lucullus,” in (ed.) B. Inwood and J. Mansfeld, Assent and Argument: Studies in Cicero's Academic Books, 36–57. Leiden
Goldschmidt, V. (1978). “Remarques sur l'origine épicurienne de la ‘prénotion’,” in Les stoïciens et leur logique. Actes du colloque de Chantilly 18–22 septembre 1976, 155–69. Paris
Gotoff, H. C. (1986). “Cicero's analysis of the prosecution speeches in the Pro Caelio: An exercise in practical criticism,” CPh 81: 122–32
Gottschalk, H. B. (1980). Heraclides of Pontus. Oxford
Graf, F. (1992). “Heiligtum und Ritual. Das Beispiel der griechisch-römischen Asklepieia,” in Le sanctuaire grec, 159–203. Geneva
Griffin, M. (1995). “Philosophical badinage in Cicero's letters to his friends,” in (ed.) Powell (1995a) 325–46
Griffin, M. (1997). “The composition of the Academica: motives and versions,” in (ed.) B. Inwood and J. Mansfeld, Assent and Argument: Studies in Cicero's Academic Books, 1–35. Leiden
Grodzynski, D. (1974). “Superstitio,” REA 76: 36–60
Gruen, E. (1965). “The lex Varia,” JRS 55: 59–73
Guthrie, W. K. C. (1962). A History of Greek Philosophy. Vol. I. Cambridge
Habicht, C. (1990). Cicero the Politician. Baltimore and London
Hall, J. (1996). “Social evasion and aristocratic manners in Cicero's De oratore,” AJPh 117: 95–120
Hand, F. (1829–45). Tursellinus seu De particulis Latinis commentarii. 4 vols. Leipzig
Handford, S. A. (1947). The Latin Subjunctive. London
Hanssen, J. S. T. (1952). Latin Diminutives: a Semantic Study. Bergen
Harris, B. F. (1961). Cicero as an Academic: a Study of De natura deorum. Auckland
Hartung, H.-J. (1970). ‘Ciceros Methode bei der Übersetzung griechischer philosophischer Termini’. Diss. Hamburg
Haury, A. (1955). L'ironie et l'humour chez Cicéron. Leiden
Heinemann, I. (1921–28). Poseidonios' metaphysische Schriften. 2 vols. Breslau
Heinze, R. (1960). Vom Geist des Römertums, ed. E. Burck.3 Darmstadt 1960
Helbig, W. (1963–72). Führer durch die öffentlichen Sammlungen klassischer Altertümer in Rom. Rev. B. Andreae et al. 4 vols. Tübingen
Henrichs, A. (1974). “Die Kritik der stoischen Theologie im PHerc. 1428,” CErc. 4: 5–32
Henrichs, A. (1975). “Two doxographical notes: Democritus and Prodicus on religion,” HSPh 79: 93–123
Henrichs, A. (1976). “The atheism of Prodicus,” CErc 6: 15–21
Hirzel, R. (1877–83). Untersuchungen zu Ciceros philosophischen Schriften. 3 vols. Leipzig
Hirzel, R. (1895). Der Dialog. 2 vols. Leipzig
Hofmann, J. B. (1985). La lingua d'uso latina. Rev. L. Ricottilli. Bologna
Hunt, T. J. (1998). A Textual History of Cicero's Academici libri. Leiden
Hutchinson, G. O.(1995). “Rhythm, style, and meaning in Cicero's prose,” CQ 89: 485–99
Hutchinson, G. O. (1998). Cicero's Correspondence: a Literary Study. Oxford
Inwood, B. (1985). Ethics and Human Action in Early Stoicism. Oxford
Inwood, B. (1987). “Commentary on Striker,” in Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 2: 95–101
Ioppolo, A. M. (1980). Aristone di Chio e lo stoicismo antico. Naples
Jacoby, F. (1959). “Diagoras ὁ ἄθ∊ος,” in Abhandlungen der Deutschen Akademie der Wissenschaften, philos.-hist. Kl. 1953, 3. Berlin
Jaeger, W. (1934). Aristotle: Fundamentals of the History of his Development. Tr. R. Robinson. Oxford
Jaeger, W. (1947). The Theology of the Early Greek Philosophers. Tr. E. S. Robinson. Oxford
Janko, R. (2001). “The Derveni Papyrus (Diagoras of Melos, Apopyrgizontes logoi?): a new translation,” CPh 96: 1–32
Kany-Turpin, J. (1986). “Les images divines. Cicéron lecteur d' Epicure,” Revue philosophique 176: 39–58
Kenney, E. J. (1999). “Vt erat novator: anomaly, innovation and genre in Ovid, Heroides 16–21,” PBA 93: 399–414
Kiaulehn, V. (1913). ‘De scaenico dialogorum apparatu capita tria’. Diss. Halle
Kleingünther, A. (1933) Πρῶτος ∊ὑρ∊τής. Untersuchungen zur Geschichte einer Fragestellung. Leipzig
Kleve, K. (1960). “Die Unvergänglichkeit der Götter im Epikureismus,” SO 36: 116–26
Kleve, K. (1960) (1961). “Cicerone e la teologia epicurea,” in Atti del I Congresso Internazionale di Sudi ciceroniani. Vol. II: 471–7. Rome
Kleve, K. (1960) (1963). Gnosis theon. Die Lehre von der natürlichen Gotteserkenntnis in der epikureischen Theologie. Oslo
Kleve, K. (1960) (1978a). “On the beauty of god. A discussion between Epicureans, Stoics and Sceptics,” SO 53: 69–83
Kleve, K. (1960) (1978b). “The philosophical polemics in Lucretius,” in Lucrèce, 39–71. Vandoeuvres
Kleve, K. (1960) (1979). “The Epicurean isonomia and its sceptical refutation,” SO 54: 27–35
Körte, A. (1890). “Metrodori Epicurei fragmenta,” Jahrb. f. cl. Phil. Suppl. 17: 531–97
Kroon, C. (1995). Discourse Particles in Latin. A Study of nam, enim, autem, vero and at. Amsterdam
Krostenko, B. A. (2001). Cicero, Catullus and the Language of Social Performance. Chicago
Kustas, G. L. (1973). Studies in Byzantine Rhetoric. Thessalonica
Laks, A. (1983). Diogène d'Apollonie. La dernière cosmologie présocratique. Lille
Latte, K. (1960). Römische Religionsgeschichte. Munich
Laughton, E. (1964). The Participle in Cicero. Oxford
Laurand, L. (1936–38). Etudes sur le style des discours de Cicéron. 4 Paris
Lebek, W. D. (1970). Verba prisca. Die Anfänge des Archaisierens in der lateinischen Beredsamkeit und Geschichtsschreibung. Göttingen
Lebreton, J. 1901. Etudes sur la langue et la grammaire de Cicéron. Paris
Lemke, D. (1973). Die Theologie Epikurs. Versuch einer Rekonstruktion. Munich
Leo, F. (1913). Geschichte der römischen Literatur. Vol. I. Berlin
Leonhardt, J. (1999). Ciceros Kritik der Philosophenschulen. Munich
Leumann, M. (1977). Lateinische Laut- und Formenlehre. Munich
Levine, P. (1957a). “The original design and the publication of the De natura deorum,” HSPh. 62: 7–36
Levine, P. (1957b). “Cicero and the literary dialogue,” CJ 53: 146–51
Lévy, C. (1992) Cicero academicus. Recherches sur les Académiques et sur la philosophie cicéronienne. Rome
Linderski, J. (1972). “The aedileship of Favonius, Curio the Younger and Cicero's election to the augurate,” HSPh 76: 181–200 = Roman Questions: Selected Papers, no. 20. Stuttgart 1995
Lloyd, G. E. R. (1991). Methods and Problems in Greek Science. Cambridge
Long, A. A. (1971). “Aisthesis, prolepsis and linguistic theory in Epicurus,” BICS 18: 114–33
Long, A. A. (1978). “Timon of Phlius: Pyrrhonist and satirist.” PCPhS 204: 68–91
Long, A. A. (1996). Stoic Studies. Cambridge
Long, A. A. ed. (1999). The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy. Cambridge
Luschnat, O. (1958). “Das Problem des ethischen Fortschritts in der alten Stoa,” Philologus 102: 178–214
Makin, S. (1993). Indifference Arguments. Oxford
Maltby, R. (1991). A Lexicon of Ancient Latin Etymologies. Leeds
Mansfeld, J. (1975). “Alcmaeon: ‘physikos’ or physician?,” in (ed.) J. Mansfeld and L. M. de Rijk, Kephalaion: Studies in Greek Philosophy and its Continuation Offered to Professor C. J. de Vogel, 26–38. Assen
Mansfeld, J. (1993). “Aspects of Epicurean theology,” Mnemosyne 46: 172–210
Marinone, N. (1997). Cronologia ciceroniana. Rome
Marshall, B. A. (1975). “Q. Cicero, Hortensius and the Lex Aurelia,” RhM 118: 136–52
Martin, A., and O. Primavesi (1999). L'Empédocle de Strasbourg (P. Strasb. gr. Inv. 1665–66). Berlin
McGibbon, D. (1965). “The religious thought of Democritus,” Hermes 93: 385–97
McKim, R. (1984). “Democritus against scepticism: all sense-impressions are true,” in International Congress on Democritus 281–90. Xanthe
McKirahan, R. (1996). “Epicurean doxography in Cicero, De natura deorum Book I,” in (ed.) G. Giannantoni and M. Gigante, Epicureismo greco e romano. Vol. II: 865–78. Naples
Meiser, G. (1998). Historische Laut- und Formenlehre der lateinischen Sprache. Darmstadt
Menge, H. (1959). Lateinische Synonymik5. Rev. O. Schönberger. Heidelberg
Merguet, H. (1887–94). Lexikon zu den philosophischen Schriften Cicero's. 3 vols. Jena
Merlan, P. (1976). “Aristoteles' und Epikurs' müssige Götter,” in (ed.) F. Merlan, Kleine philosophische Schriften, 289–302. Hildesheim
Mitsis, P. (1988). Epicurus' Ethical Theory. Ithaca
Momigliano, A. (1942). “‘Terra marique’,” JRS 32: 53–64
Monet, A. (1996). “[Philodème, Sur les sensations] PHerc. 19/698,” CErc. 26: 27–126
Moraux, P. (1973–84). Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen. 2 vols. Berlin
Morrow, G. R. (1960). Plato's Cretan City. Princeton
Most, G. W. (1989). “Cornutus and Stoic allegoresis: a preliminary report,” ANRW II.36.3: 2014–65
Müller, H. (1964). ‘Ciceros Prosaübersetzungen’. Diss. Marburg
Myers, K. S. (1994). Ovid's Causes: Cosmogony and Aetiology in the Metamorphoses. Ann Arbor
Newcomb, S. (1910). “Astronomy,” The Encyclopaedia Britannica. 11 Vol. II. Cambridge
Nisbet, R. (1990). “Cola and clausulae in Cicero's speeches,” in (ed.) E. M. Craik, ‘Owls to Athens’: Essays on Classical Subjects Presented to Sir Kenneth Dover, 349–59. Oxford
Norden, E. (1913). Agnostos Theos. Leipzig–Berlin
O'Meara, D. J. (1993). Plotinus: an Introduction to the Enneads. Oxford
Obbink, D. (1989). “The atheism of Epicurus,” GRBS 30: 187–223
Obbink, D. (1992). “‘What all men believe – must be true’: common conceptions and the consensio omnium in Aristotle and Hellenistic philosophy,” OSAP 10: 193–231
Obbink, D. (2001). “Le livre I du De natura deorum de Cicéron et le De pietate de Philodème,” in (ed.) C. Auvray-Assayas and D. Delattre, Cicéron et Philodème. La polémique en philosophie, 203–25. Paris
Obbink, D. (2002). “‘All gods are true’ in Epicurus,” in (ed.) D. Frede and A. Laks, Traditions of Theology: Studies in Hellenistic Theology, its Background and Aftermath, 183–221. Leiden
Oksala, P. (1953). Die griechischen Lehnwörter in den Prosaschriften Ciceros. Helsinki
Opelt, I. (1966). “Ciceros Schrift De natura deorum bei den lateinischen Kirchenvätern,” A & A 12: 141–55
Oppel, H. (1937). ਖανών. Zur Bedeutungsgeschichte des Wortes und seiner lateinischen Entsprechungen (regula-norma). Philologus Suppl. 30.4. Leipzig
Orlin, E. M. (1997). Temples, Religion and Politics in the Roman Republic. Leiden
Otto, A. (1890). Die Sprichwörter und sprichwörtlichen Redensarten der Römer. Leipzig
Overbeck, J. (1868). Die antiken Schriftquellen zur Geschichte der bildenden Künste bei den Griechen. Leipzig
Perrot, J. (1961). Les dérivés latins en -men et -mentum. Paris
Pfeiffer, R. (1968). History of Classical Scholarship from the Beginnings to the End of the Hellenistic Age. Oxford
Philippson, R. (1916). “Zur epikureischen Götterlehre,” Hermes 51: 568–608
Philippson, R. (1939). “M. Tullius Cicero (Philosophische Schriften),” Paulys Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft (ed.) G. Wissowa, W. Kroll, K. Mittelhaus, K. Ziegler. 83 vols. Stuttgart 1893–Munich 1978. VIIA1: 1104–92
Philippson, R. (1940). “Des akademikers Kritik der epikureischen Theologie im ersten Buche der Tuskulanen [sic] Ciceros,” SO 20: 21–44
Pohlenz, M. (1978–80). Die Stoa. 5 2 vols. Göttingen
Powell, J. G. F., ed. (1995a). Cicero the Philosopher. Oxford
Powell, J. G. F. (1995b). “Cicero's translations from Greek,” in Powell (1995a) 273–300
Preibisch, P., ed. (1878). Fragmenta librorum pontificiorum. Tilsit
Puhvel, J. (1987). Comparative Mythology. Baltimore
Purinton, J. (2001). “Epicurus on the nature of the gods,” OSAP 21: 181–231
Rathofer, C. (1986). Ciceros ‘Brutus’ als literarisches Paradigma eines Auctoritas-Verhältnisses. Frankfurt am Main
Read, C. (1901). Logic: Deductive and Inductive. 2 London
Reinhardt, L. (1888). Die Quellen von Cicero's Schrift De deorum natura, in: Breslauer philologische Abhandlungen 3.10. Breslau
Reynolds, L. D., ed. (1983). Texts and Transmission: a Survey of the Latin Classics. Oxford
Riedweg, C. (1997). “‘Pythagoras hinterliess keine einzige Schrift’ – ein Irrtum?” MH 54: 65–92
Riggsby, A. M. (1999). Crime and Community in Ciceronian Rome. Austin
Rohde, G. (1936). Die Kultsatzungen der römischen Pontifices. Berlin
Romaniello, G. (1975). Reply to Boyancé, Ciceroniana n.s. 2: 40–42
Royce, J. (1915). “Monotheism,” in (ed.) J. Hastings, Encyclopaedia of Religion and Ethics. Vol. VIII: 817–21. Edinburgh
Runia, D. T. (1996). “Atheists in Aëtius: text, translation and comments on De placitis 1.7.1–10,” Mnemosyne 49: 542–76
Rüpke, J. (1995). Kalender und Öffentlichkeit. Berlin
Sachot, M. (1991). “Religio/superstitio,” Revue de l'histoire des religions 208: 355–94
Santoro, M., ed. (2000). Demetrio Lacone. La forma del dio (PHerc. 1055). Naples
Schäublin, C. (1990). “Philosophie und Rhetorik in der Auseinandersetzung um die Religion,” MH 47: 87–101
Scheid, J. (1987). “Polytheism impossible; or, the empty gods: reasons behind a void in the history of Roman religion,” History and Anthropology 3: 303–25
Schiesaro, A. (1990). Simulacrum et imago: gli argomenti analogici nel De rerum natura. Pisa
Schmalzriedt, E. (1970). Π∊ρὶ ࢱύσ∊ως. Zur Frühgeschichte der Buchtitel. Munich
Schmidt, E. A. (1978). “Die ursprüngliche Gliederung von Ciceros Dialog ‘De natura deorum’,” Philologus 122: 59–67
Schmidt, M. (1976). Die Erklärungen zum Weltbild Homers und zur Kultur der Heroenzeit in den bT-Scholien zur Ilias. Munich
Schmidt, P. L. (1974). Die Überlieferung von Ciceros Schrift “De Legibus” in Mittelalter und Renaissance. Munich
Schmidt, P. L. (2000). Traditio Latinitatis. Studien zur Rezeption und Überlieferung der lateinischen Literatur. Stuttgart
Schoemann, G. F. (1858). Opuscula academica. Vol. III. Berlin
Schofield, M. (1980). An Essay on Anaxagoras. Cambridge
Schofield, M. (1991). The Stoic Idea of the City. Cambridge
Scott, D. (1995). Recollection and Experience: Plato's Theory of Learning and its Successors. Cambridge
Scullard, H. H. (1981). Festivals and Ceremonies of the Roman People. London
Seager, R. (1972). “Cicero and the word popularis,” CQ 22: 328–38
Sedley, D. (1976). “Epicurus and his professional rivals” in (ed.) Bollack and Laks (1976) 121–59
Sedley, D. (1983). “Epicurus' refutation of determinism” in Συζήτησις. Studi sull' Epicureismo greco e romano offerti a Marcello Gigante. Vol. I: 11–51. Naples
Sedley, D. (1998). Lucretius and the Transformation of Greek Wisdom. Cambridge
Sittl, K. (1890). Die Gebärden der Griechen und Römer. Leipzig
Smith, M. F. (1976). “More new fragments of Diogenes of Oenoanda,” in (ed.) Bollack and Laks (1976) 279–318
Smith, P. R. (1995). “‘A self-indulgent misuse of leisure and writing’? How not to write philosophy: did Cicero get it right?,” in (ed.) Powell (1995a) 301–23
Solmsen, F. (1942). Plato's Theology. Ithaca
Solmsen, F. (1960). Aristotle's System of the Physical World: a Comparison with his Predecessors. Ithaca
Solmsen, F. (1968–82). Kleine Schriften. 3 vols. Hildesheim
Solodow, J. B. (1978). The Latin Particle quidem. Boulder
Steidle, W. (1952). “Einflüsse römischen Lebens und Denkens auf Ciceros Schrift De oratore,” MH 9: 10–41
Stockton, D. (1979). The Gracchi. Oxford
Striker, G. (1987). “Origins of the concept of natural law,” in Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 2: 79–94 = Striker (1996) no. 11
Striker, G. (1991). “Following nature: a study in Stoic ethics,” OSAP 9: 1–73 = Striker (1996) no. 12
Striker, G. (1995). “Cicero and Greek philosophy,” HSPh 97: 53–61
Striker, G. (1996). Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics. Cambridge
Summers, K. (1997). “The books of Phaedrus requested by Cicero (Att. 13.39),” CQ 91: 309–11
Szemler, G. J. (1972). The Priests of the Roman Republic. Brussels
Tarán, L. (1987). “Cicero's attitude toward Stoicism and Scepticism in the ‘De natura deorum’,” in (ed.) K.-L. Selig and R. Somerville, Florilegium Columbianum: Essays in Honor of P. O. Kristeller, 1–22. New York
Testard, M. (1958). Saint Augustin et Cicéron. 2 vols. Paris
Thielmann, P. (1885). “Habere mit dem Infinitiv und die Entstehung des romanischen Futurums,” ALL 2: 48–89
Todd, O. J. (1942). “Sense and sound in classical poetry,” CQ 36: 29–39
Toland, J. (1699). Life of John Milton. London
Uri, H. (1914). ‘Cicero und die epikureische Philosophie.’ Diss. Munich. Borna-Leipzig
Usener, H. (1977). Glossarium Epicureum. Ed. M. Gigante, W. Schmid. Rome
Vallot, G. (1962–3). “La cosmologia stoica nella polemica di Velleio (Cicerone, De natura deorum I 18–24),” Atti dell'Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti, Classe di Scienze morali e Lettere 121: 1–18
Vander Waerdt, P. A. (1988). “Hermarchus and the Epicurean genealogy of morals,” TAPhA 118: 87–106
Vasaly, A. (1993). Representations: Images of the World in Ciceronian Oratory. Berkeley
Verdenius, W. J. (1954). “Platons Gottesbegriff,” in La notion du divin depuis Homère jusqu'à Platon, 271–83. Vandoeuvres
Versnel, H. S. (1990–3). Inconsistencies in Greek and Roman Religion. 2 vols. Leiden
Vlastos, G. (1945–6). “Ethics and physics in Democritus,” Philosophical Review 54: 578–92 and 55: 53–64
Wageningen, I. van (1911). “Varia,” Mnemosyne 39: 135–40
Walsh, P. G. (1998). tr. Cicero, ‘On the Nature of the Gods.’ Oxford
Weische, A. (2000). “Eigentümlich Lateinisches und Ciceronisches bei Augustinus als Basis für Anselms Gottesbeweis,” MH 47: 193–200
Weise, O. (1909). Language and Character of the Roman People. Tr. H. A. Strong, A. Y. Campbell. London
Welch, K. E. (1998). “Cicero and Brutus in 45,” in (ed.) T. W. Hillard et al., Ancient History in a Modern University. I: 244–56. N. S. W., Australia
West, M. L. (1983). The Orphic Poems. Oxford
West, M. L. (1985). The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women. Oxford
White, S. A. (1995). “Cicero and the therapists,” in (ed.) Powell (1995a) 219–46
Widmann, S. (1968). Untersuchungen zur Übersetzungstechnik Ciceros in seiner philosophischen Prosa. Tübingen
Wilkinson, L. P. (1963). Golden Latin Artistry. Cambridge
Wills, J. (1996). Repetition in Latin Poetry: Figures of Allusion. Oxford
Winiarczyk, M. (1976). “Der erste Atheistenkatalog des Kleitomachus,” Philologus 120: 32–46
Winiarczyk, M. ed. (1981a). Diagorae Melii et Theodori Cyrenaei reliquiae. Leipzig
Winiarczyk, M. (1981b). “Theodoros ὁ ἄθ∊ος,” Philologus 125: 64–94
Winiarczyk, M. 1984). “Wer galt im Altertum als Atheist?” Philologus 128: 157–83
Winiarczyk, M. (1987). “Nochmals das Satyrspiel ‘Sisyphos’,” WS 100: 35–46
Winiarczyk, M. (1990). “Methodisches zum antiken Atheismus,” RhM 133: 1–15
Winiarczyk, M. ed. (1991), Euhemeri Messenii reliquiae. Leipzig
Winiarczyk, M. (1992). “Wer galt im Altertum als Atheist? 2. Teil,” Philologus 136: 306–10
Wissowa, G. (1912). Religion und Kultus der Römer. Munich
Wöhrle, G. (1991). “Zur metaphorischen Verwendung von ἕλκος und ulcus in der antiken Literatur,” Mnemosyne 44: 1–16
Wöhrle, G. (1993). Anaximenes aus Milet. Die Fragmente zu seiner Lehre. Stuttgart
Wölfflin, E. (1885). “Was heißt bald … bald?” ALL 2: 233–54
Woodbury, L. (1965). “The date and atheism of Diagoras of Melos,” Phoenix 19: 178–211
Woodcock, E. C. (1959). A New Latin Syntax. Cambridge, MA
Woodward, P. G. (1989). “Star gods in Philodemus, PHerc. 152/157,” CErc. 19: 29–47
Wright, F. W. (1931). Cicero and the Theatre. Northampton, MA
Wright, M. R. (1981). Empedocles: the Extant Fragments. New Haven
Zellmer, E. (1976). Die lateinischen Wörter auf -ura. 2 Frankfurt a.M
Zelzer, M. and K. (2001). “Zur Überlieferung des Leidener Corpus philosophischer Schriften des Cicero,” WS 114: 183–214
Zielinski, T. (1904). Das Clauselgesetz in Ciceros Reden. Leipzig
Metrics
Altmetric attention score
Full text views
Full text views helpTotal number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...
* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.
Usage data cannot currently be displayed.
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.
Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.