Defining Pragmatics

Mira Ariel

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511777912

References

Abbott, Barbara, 2000. Presuppositions as nonassertions. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1419–1437.

Abbott, Barbara, 2006. Where have some of the presuppositions gone? In Birner, Betty J. and Ward, Gregory L., eds., Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning: Neo-Gricean Studies in Pragmatics and Semantics in Honor of Laurence R. Horn. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1–20.

Agha, Asif, 2007. Language and Social Relations. Cambridge University Press.

Aissen, Judith, 1997. On the syntax of obviation. Language 73: 705–750.

Ambridge, Ben and Goldberg, Adele E., 2008. The island status of clausal complements: evidence in favor of an information structure explanation. Cognitive Linguistics 19: 357–389.

Anscombre, Jean-Claude and Ducrot, Oswald, 1976. L'argumentation dans la langue. Langages 42: 5–27.

Anscombre, Jean-Claude and Ducrot, Oswald, 1977. Deux mais en Français. Lingua 43: 23–40.

Ariel, Mira, 1983. Linguistic marking of social prominence: the Hebrew mi she introducer. Journal of Pragmatics 7: 389–409.

Ariel, Mira, 1985a. Givenness marking. Ph.D. dissertation, Tel Aviv University.

Ariel, Mira, 1985b. The discourse functions of Given information. Theoretical Linguistics 12: 99–113.

Ariel, Mira, 1988. Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics 24: 65–87.

Ariel, Mira, 1990. Accessing Noun-phrase Antecedents. London: Routledge.

Ariel, Mira, 1998a. Discourse markers and form–function correlations. In Jucker, Andreas H. and Ziv, Yael, eds., Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory (Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 57). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 223–259.

Ariel, Mira, 1998b. The linguistic status of the ‘here and now.’Cognitive Linguistics 9: 189–237.

Ariel, Mira, 1999. Mapping so-called ‘pragmatic’ phenomena according to a ‘linguistic-extralinguistic’ distinction: the case of propositions marked ‘accessible.’ In Darnell, Michael, Moravcsik, Edith A., Newmeyer, Frederick J., Noonan, Michael and Wheatley, Kathleen M., eds., Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics, vol. II: Case studies (Studies in Language Companion Series 41). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 11–38.

Ariel, Mira, 2001. Accessibility theory: an overview. In Sanders, Ted J. M., Schilperoord, Joost and Spooren, Wilbert, eds., Text Representation: Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Aspects. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 29–87.

Ariel, Mira, 2002a. The demise of a unique concept of literal meaning. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 361–402.

Ariel, Mira, 2002b. Privileged interactional interpretations. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 1003–1044.

Ariel, Mira, 2004. Most. Language 80: 658–706.

Ariel, Mira, 2006a. The making of a construction: from reflexive marking to lower transitivity. Unpublished ms., Tel Aviv University.

Ariel, Mira, 2006b. A ‘just that’ lexical meaning for most. In Heusinger, Klaus and Turner, Ken, eds., Where Semantics meets Pragmatics (Current Research in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface). London: Elsevier, 49–91.

Ariel, Mira, 2007. Relational and independent strategies in interpreting and conjunctions. Unpublished ms., Tel Aviv University.

Ariel, Mira, 2008. Pragmatics and Grammar. Cambridge University Press.

Ariel, Mira, forthcoming. On order, subordination and freedom. Leshonenu La-am: Special Issue in memory of Shaul Aloni (in Hebrew).

Arnold, Jennifer, Wasow, Thomas A., Losongco, Anthony and Ginstrom, Ryan, 2000. Heaviness versus newness: the effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering. Language 76: 28–55.

Atlas, Jay David and Levinson, Stephen C., 1981. It-clefts, informativeness, and logical form: radical pragmatics (revised standard version). In Cole, Peter, ed., Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 1–61.

Austin, John L., 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Bach, Kent, 1994a. Conversational implicature. Mind and Language 9: 124–162.

Bach, Kent, 1994b. Semantic slack: what is said and more. In Tsohatzidis, Savas L., ed., Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives. London: Routledge, 267–291.

Bach, Kent, 1999a. The myth of conventional implicature. Linguistics and Philosophy 22: 327–366.

Bach, Kent, 1999b. The semantics–pragmatics distinction: what it is and why it matters. In Turner, Ken, ed., The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View. Oxford: Elsevier, 65–84.

Bach, Kent, 2002. Semantic, pragmatic. In Campbell, Joseph Keim, O'Rourke, Michael and Shier, David, eds., Meaning and Truth. New York: Seven Bridges Press, 284–292.

Bach, Kent, 2004a. Minding the gap. In Bianchi, Claudia, ed., The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction. Stanford: CSLI, 27–43.

Bach, Kent, 2004b. Pragmatics and the philosophy of language. In Horn, Laurence R. and Ward, Gregory L., eds., Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell, 463–487.

Bach, Kent and Harnish, Robert M., 1979. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Bakht-Rofheart, Maryam, 2004. Not so elite anymore: shifting ideologies and language choice in a Long Island friendship cohort. Paper presented at Third international gender and language association conference, Cornell University, New York.

Balaban, Noga, in progress. Linguistic implications of acquired damage to ‘Theory of Mind’ (in Hebrew). Ph.D. Dissertation, Tel Aviv University.

Ball, Catherine N. and Ariel, Mira, 1978. Or something, etc. Penn Review of Linguistics 3: 35–45.

Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua, 1970. Aspects of Language: Essays and Lectures on Philosophy of Language, Linguistic Philosophy and Methodology of Linguistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua, 1971. Out of the pragmatic wastebasket. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 401–407.

Bard, Ellen Gurman, 1993. Restrictions on modularity: does ‘would’ prime ‘timber’? Talk given at The Institute for Research in Cognitive Science, University of Pennsylvania, 3.5.1993.

Bard, Ellen Gurman, Robertson, Dan and Sorace, Antonella, 1996. Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability. Language 72: 32–68.

Bard, Ellen Gurman, Anderson, Anne H., Sotillo, Catherine, Aylett, Mattew, Doherty-Sneddon, Gwyneth and Newlands, Alison, 2000. Controlling the intelligibility of referring expressions in dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language 42: 1–22.

Barker, Stephen, 2003. Truth and conventional implicature. Mind 112: 1–33.

Barlow, Michael, 1992. A Situated Theory of Agreement (Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics). New York: Garland.

Bartsch, Renate, 1979. Semantical and pragmatical correctness as basic notions of the theory of meaning. Journal of Pragmatics 3: 1–43.

Bates, Elizabeth, Thal, Donna, Finlay, Barbara and Clancy, Barbara, 2003. Early language development and its neural correlates. In Rapin, I. and Segalowitz, S., eds., Handbook of Neuropsychology, vol. VIII: Child neurology (2nd edition). Amsterdam: Elsevier, 109–176.

Beeman, Mark, Friedman, Rhonda B., Grafman, Jordan, Perez, Enrique, Diamond, Sherri and Lindsay, Miriam Beadle, 1994. Summation priming and coarse semantic coding in the right hemisphere. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 6: 26–45.

Bencini, Giulia M. L. and Goldberg, Adele E., 2000. The contribution of argument structure constructions to sentence meaning. Journal of Memory and Language 43: 640–651.

Bever, Tom G., 1970. The influence of speech performance on linguistic structure. In Willem, J.Levelt, M. and Flores d'Arcais, Giovanni B., eds., Advances in Psycholinguistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 21–50.

Bezuidenhout, Anne, 2004. Procedural meaning and the semantics/pragmatics interface. In Claudia Bianchi, ed., The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction. Stanford: CSLI, 101–131.

Birner, Betty J., 1994. Information status and word order: an analysis of English inversion. Language 70: 233–259.

Birner, Betty J. and Ward, Gregory L., 1998. Information Status and Noncanonical Word Order in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Blakemore, Diane, 1987. Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.

Blakemore, Diane, 1992. Understanding Utterances (Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics 6). Oxford: Blackwell.

Blakemore, Diane, 1995. Relevance theory. In Verschueren, Jef, Östman, Jan-Ola, Blommaert, Jan and Bulcaen, Chris, eds., Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 443–452.

Blakemore, Diane, 2002. Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge University Press.

Blakemore, Diane and Carston, Robyn, 2005. The pragmatics of sentential coordination with and. Lingua 115: 569–589.

Bloomfield, Leonard, 1933. Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, House, Juliane and Kasper, Gabriele eds., 1989. Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Blumstein, Sheila E., 1988. Neurolinguistics: an overview of language-brain relations in aphasia. In Newmeyer, Frederick J. and Robins, R. H., eds., Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, vol. III: Language: Psychological and biological aspects. Cambridge University Press, 210–236.

Bock, Kathryn J., 1986. Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology 18: 355–387.

Bod, Rens, 1998. Beyond Grammar: An Experience-Based Theory of Language (CSLI Lecture Notes 88). Stanford: CSLI Publications.

Bod, Rens, 2005. Exemplar-based syntax. Paper presented at the 2005 LSA meeting, Oakland, USA.

Bolinger, Dwight L., 1986. Intonation and its Parts: Melody in Spoken English. Stanford University Press.

Bolinger, Dwight L., 1989. Intonation and its Uses: Melody in Grammar and Discourse. Stanford University Press.

Borg, Emma, 2004. Minimal Semantics. Oxford University Press.

Borochovsky Bar-Aba, Esther, 2003. Punctuation marks: procedural and conceptual uses. Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1031–1048.

Bowe, Heather J., 1990. Categories, Constituents, and Constituent Order in Pitjantjatjara: An Aboriginal Language of Australia. London: Routledge.

Bresnan, Joan, 2006. Is syntactic knowledge probabilistic? Experiments with the English dative alternation. Paper presented at International Conference on Linguistic Evidence, Tuebingen.

Bresnan, Joan and Hay, Jennifer, 2008. Gradient grammar: an effect of animacy on the syntax of give in New Zealand and American English. Lingua 118: 245–259.

Bresnan, Joan, Cueni, Anna, Nikitina, Tatiana and Baayen, R. Harald, 2007. Predicting the dative alternation. In Boume, Gerlof, Krämer, Irene and Zwarts, Joost, eds., Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Science, 69–94.

Brockway, Diane, 1981. Semantic constraints on relevance. In Parret, Herman, Sbisà, Marina and Verschueren, Jef, eds., Possibilities and Limitations of Pragmatics (Studies in Language Companion Series 7). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 57–78.

Brown, Gillian and Yule, George, 1983. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge University Press.

Brown, Penelope, 1995. Politeness strategies and the attribution of intentions: the case of Tzeltal irony. In Goody, Esther N., ed., Social Intelligence and Interaction. Cambridge University Press, 153–174.

Brown, Penelope and Levinson, Stephen C., 1978. Universals of language usage: politeness phenomena. In Goody, Esther N., ed., Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction. Cambridge University Press, 56–311.

Brown, Penelope and Levinson, Stephen C., 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.

Brownell, Hiram H., Carroll, John J., Rehak, Alexandra and Wingfield, Arthur, 1992. The use of pronoun anaphora and speaker mood in the interpretation of conversational utterances by right hemisphere brain-damaged patients. Brain and Language 43: 121–147.

Bucholtz, Mary and Hall, Kira, 2005. Identity and interaction: a sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies 7: 585–614.

Burton-Roberts, Noel, 1987. Pragmatics and Wittgenstein: ostensive and non-descriptive definition. In Verschueren, Jef and Bertuccelli-Papi, Marcella, eds., The Pragmatic Perspective (Pragmatics and Beyond Companion Series 5). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 733–753.

Burton-Roberts, Noel, 1999. Presupposition-cancellation and metalinguistic negation: a reply to Carston. Journal of Linguistics 35: 347–364.

Bybee, Joan L., 2001. Phonology and Language Use (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 94). Cambridge University Press.

Bybee, Joan L., 2003. Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: the role of repetition. In Janda, Richard D. and Joseph, Brian D., eds., Handbook of Historical Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 602–623.

Bybee, Joan L. and Hopper, Paul J., eds., 2001. Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure (Typological Studies in Language 45). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Bybee, Joan L., Perkins, Revere D. and Pagliuca, William, 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. University of Chicago Press.

Cameron, Deborah, 1985. Feminism and Linguistic Theory. London: Macmillan.

Cameron, Deborah, McAlinden, Fiona and Kathy, O' Leary, , 1989. Lakoff in context: the social and linguistic functions of tag questions. In Coates, Jennifer and Cameron, Deborah, eds., Women in their Speech Communities. London: Longman, 74–93.

Cappelen, Herman and Lepore, Ernest, 2005. Insensitive Semantics: A Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism. Oxford: Blackwell.

Carnap, Rudolf, 1938. Foundations of logic and mathematics. In Neurath, Otto, Carnap, Rudolf and Morris, Charles W., eds., International Encyclopedia of Unified Science. University of Chicago Press, 139–214.

Carston, Robyn, 1988. Implicature, explicature and truth-theoretic semantics. In Ruth M. Kempson, ed., Mental Representations: The Interface between Language and Reality. Cambridge University Press, 155–181. (Reprinted in Kasher, 1998b, vol. IV, 436–464).

Carston, Robyn, 1990. Quantity maxims and generalised implicature. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 2: 1–31. (Reprinted in Lingua 96: 213–244).

Carston, Robyn, 1999a. The semantics/pragmatics distinction: a view from relevance theory. In Ken Turner, ed., The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View. Oxford: Elsevier, 85–125.

Carston, Robyn, 1999b. Negation, ‘presupposition’ and metarepresentation: a response to Noel Burton-Roberts. Journal of Linguistics 35: 365–389.

Carston, Robyn, 2002. Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.

Carston, Robyn, 2008. Linguistic communication and the semantics/pragmatics distinction. Synthese 165: 321–345.

Chafe, Wallace L., 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In Charles N. Li, ed., Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press, 25–55.

Chafe, Wallace L., 1979. The flow of thought and the flow of language. In Talmy Givón, ed., Syntax and Semantics, vol. XII: Discourse and syntax. New York: Academic Press, 159–181.

Chafe, Wallace L., 1987. Cognitive constraints on information flow. In Russell S. Tomlin, ed., Coherence and Grounding in Discourse (Typological Studies in Language 11). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 21–51.

Chafe, Wallace L., 1994. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Consciousness Experience in Speaking and Writing. University of Chicago Press.

Chiarello, Christine, ed., 1988. RightHemisphere Contributions to Lexical Semantics. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

Chierchia, Gennaro, 2004. Scalar implicatures, polarity phenomena, and the syntax/pragmatics interface. In Adriana Belletti, ed., Structures and Beyond. New York: Oxford University Press, 39–103.

Chierchia, Gennaro and McConnell-Ginet, Sally, 1990. Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Chomsky, Noam, 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Chomsky, Noam, 1975. Reflections on Language. New York: Pantheon.

Chomsky, Noam, 1979. Language and Responsibility. New York: Pantheon.

Chomsky, Noam, 1980. Rules and Representations. New York: Columbia University Press.

Chomsky, Noam, 2000. New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge University Press.

Chun, Elaine W., 2001. The construction of white, black and Korean American identities through African American Vernacular English. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11: 52–64.

Clancy, Patricia M. and Downing, Pamela A., 1987. The use of wa as a cohesion marker in Japanese oral narratives. In Hinds, John, Iwasaki, Shoichi and Maynard, Senko K., eds., Perspectives on Topicalization: The Case of Japanese wa (Typological Studies in Language 14). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 3–56.

Clark, Herbert H., 1996. Using Language. Cambridge University Press.

Cohen, Jonathan L., 1971. Some remarks on Grice's view about the logical particles of natural language. In Yehoshua Bar-Hillel, ed., Pragmatics of Natural Languages. Dordrecht: Reidel, 50–68.

Cohen, Jonathan L., 1974. Speech acts. In Thomas A. Sebeok, ed., Current Trends in Linguistics, vol. XII: Linguistics and Adjacent Arts and Sciences. The Hague: Mouton, 173–210.

Cole, Peter, 1975. The synchronic and diachronic status of the conversational implicature. In Cole, Peter and Morgan, Jerry L., eds., Syntax and Semantics, vol. III: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, 257–288.

Cole, Peter ed., 1978. Syntax and Semantics, vol. IX: Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.

Cole, Peter ed., 1981. Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.

Cole, Peter and Morgan, Jerry L. eds., 1975. Syntax and Semantics, vol. III: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press.

Cole, Peter, Harbert, Wayne, Hermon, Gabriella and Sridhar, S. N., 1980. The acquisition of subjecthood. Language 56: 719–743.

Collins, Peter C., 1994. Cleft and Pseudocleft Constructions in English. London: Routledge.

Comrie, Bernard, 1994. Coreference: between grammar and discourse. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual Meeting of the Kansai Linguistic Society (1993), 1–10.

Cooper, William E. and Ross, John Robert, 1975. World order. In Grossman, Robin E., San, L. James and Vance, Timothy J., eds., Chicago Linguistic Society: Papers from the Parasession on Functionalism. Chicago Linguistic Society, 63–111.

Cooreman, Ann, 1992. The pragmatics of word order variation in Chamorro narrative text. In Doris L. Payne, ed., Pragmatics of Word Order Flexibility. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 243–264.

Corum, Claudia, 1975. Basques, particles and baby talk: a case for pragmatics. Paper presented at Berkeley Linguistics Society.

Coulson, Seana and Federmeier, Kara D., 2003. Words in context: ERPs and the lexical/postlexical distinction. Unpublished ms., UC San Diego.

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, 2009. A sequential approach to affect: the case of ‘disappointment.’ In Haakana, Markku, Laakso, Minna and Lindström, Jan, eds., Talk in Interaction: Comparative Dimensions. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society (SKS), 94–123.

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Selting, Margret, 1996. Towards an interactional perspective on prosody and prosodic perspective on interaction. In Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Selting, Margret, eds., Prosody in Conversation. Cambridge University Press, 11–56.

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Thompson, Sandra A., 2005. A linguistic practice for retracting overstatements: concessive repair. In Hakulinen, Auli and Selting, Margret, eds., Syntax and Lexis in Conversation: Studies on the Use of Linguistic Resources in Talk-In-Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 257–288.

Coupland, Nicholas, 1984. Accommodation at work: some phonological data and their implications. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 46: 49–70.

Cowles, H. Wind, Polinsky, Maria, Kutas, Marta and Kluender, Robert, 2005. On the nature of information structure violations: an ERP investigation. Paper delivered at the 2005 LSA Meeting, Oakland, USA.

Cruse, Alan, 2000. Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.

Cruse, Alan, 2004. Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics (2nd edition). Oxford University Press.

Cruttenden, Alan, 1997. Intonation (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge University Press.

Curtiss, Susan, 1988. Abnormal language acquisition and the modularity of language. In Newmeyer, Frederick J. and Robins, R. H., eds., Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, vol. II: Linguistic theory: Extensions and implications. Cambridge University Press, 96–116.

Cutica, Ilaria, Bucciarelli, Monica and Bara, Bruno G., 2006. Neuropragmatics: extralinguistic ability is better preserved in left-hemisphere-damaged patients than in right-hemisphere-damaged patients. Brain and Language 98: 12–25.

Dąbrowska, Ewa, 2008. Questions with long-distance dependencies: a usage-based perspective. Cognitive Linguistics 19: 391–425.

Dascal, Marcelo and Katriel, Tamar, 1977. Between semantics and pragmatics: the two types of ‘but’ – Hebrew ‘aval’ and ‘ela.’Theoretical Linguistics 4: 143–172.

Davidson, Donald, 1967. Truth and meaning. Synthese 17: 304–323.

Davidson, Donald, 1971. Truth and meaning. In Rosenberg, J. F. and Travis, Charles, eds., Readings in the Philosophy of Language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 450–465. (Reprinted from Synthese XVII: 3: 304–323).

Davis, Steven, 1987. The distinction between pragmatics and semantics. In Verschueren, Jef and Bertuccelli-Papi, Marcella, eds., The Pragmatic Perspective (Pragmatics and Beyond Companion Series 5). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 685–693.

Davis, Steven ed., 1991. Pragmatics: A Reader. New York: Oxford University Press.

Davis, Wayne A., 1998. Implicature: Intention, Convention, and Principle in the Failure of Gricean Theory. Cambridge University Press.

Deutscher, Guy, 2005. The Unfolding of Language. London: William Heinemann.

Diessel, Holger, 2008. Iconicity of sequence: a corpus-based analysis of the positioning of temporal adverbial clauses in English. Cognitive Linguistics 19: 465–490.

Diewald, Gabriele, 2008. Pragmaticalization (defined) as grammaticalization of discourse functions. Paper presented at 4th International Conference “New Reflections on Grammaticalization,” Leuven, Belgium, July 17, 2008.

Dijk, Teun A., 1972. Some Aspects of Text Grammars (Janua Linguarum, Series Maior 63). The Hague: Mouton.

Dillon, George L., Coleman, Linda, Fahnestock, Jeanne and Agar, Michael, 1985. Review article of Brown and Yule 1983, Leech 1983 and Levinson 1983. Language 61: 446–460.

Dor, Daniel, 1995. Representations, attitudes and factivity evaluations: an epistemically-based analysis of lexical selection. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.

Dostie, Gaétane, 2004. Pragmaticalisation et marqeurs discursifs. Analyse sémantique et traitement lexicographique. Brussels: De Boeck, Ducolot.

Drew, Paul, 1992. Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: the case of a trial for rape. In Drew, Paul and Heritage, John, eds., Talk at Work. Cambridge University Press, 470–520.

Dryer, Matthew S., 2005. Definite articles. In Haspelmath, Martin, Dryer, Matthew, Gil, David and Comrie, Bernard, eds., The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford University Press, 154–157.

Bois, Du, John, W., 1987. The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63: 805–855.

Bois, Du, John, W., 2001. Stance: intersubjectivity and the pragmatic differential in dialogic interaction. Talk given at the Hebrew department colloquium, December 30 2001.

Bois, Du, John, W., 2003. Discourse and grammar. In Michael Tomasello, ed., The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, vol. II. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 47–87.

Bois, Du, John, W., 2007. The stance triangle. In Robert Englebretson, ed., Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 139–182.

Bois, Du, John, W. in progress. The engaged stance: structure for social action. UC Santa Barbara.

Du Bois, John W., Cumming, Susanna, Schuetze-Coburn, Stephan and Paolino, Danae, 1992. Discourse transcription. Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics, vol. IV.

Du Bois, John W., Schuetze-Coburn, Stephan, Paolino, Danae and Cumming, Susanna, 1993. Outline of discourse transcription. In Edwards, Jane A. and Lampert, Martin D., eds., Talking Data: Transcription and Coding Methods for Language Research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 45–89.

Ducrot, Oswald, Bourcier, Danièle, Bruxelles, Sylvie and Diller, Anne-Marie, 1980. Les mots du discours. Paris: Editions de Minuit.

Duranti, Alessandro, 1992. Language in context and language as context: the Samoan respect vocabulary. In Duranti, Alessandro and Goodwin, Charles, eds., Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon (Studies in the Social and Cultural Foundations of Language 11). Cambridge University Press, 77–99.

Duranti, Alessandro and Goodwin, Charles, eds., 1992. Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon (Studies in the Social and Cultural Foundations of Language 11). Cambridge University Press.

Eagleton, Terry, 1982. The Rape of Clarissa. Oxford: Blackwell.

Emmorey, Karen D. and Fromkin, Victoria A., 1988. The mental lexicon. In Newmeyer, Frederick J. and Robins, R. H., eds., Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, vol. III: Language: Psychological and Biological Aspects. Cambridge University Press, 124–149.

England, Nora C., 2007. Marking aspect and mood and inferring time in Mam (Mayan). Paper presented at BLS, Berkeley.

Erman, Britt and Kostinas, Ulla-Britt, 1993. Pragmaticalization: the case of ba and you know. Studier i modern sprakvetenskap 10: 76–93.

Erteschik-Shir, Nomi, 2007. Information Structure: The Syntax–Discourse Interface. Oxford University Press.

Erteschik-Shir, Nomi and Lappin, Shalom, 1979. Dominance and the functional explanation of island phenomena. Theoretical Linguistics 6: 41–85.

Faust, Miriam and Mashal, Nira, 2007. The role of the right cerebral hemisphere in processing novel metaphoric expressions taken from poetry: a divided visual field study. Neuropsychologia 45: 860–879.

Ferguson, Charles A. and Barlow, Michael, 1988. Introduction. In Barlow, Michael and Ferguson, Charles A., eds., Agreement in Natural Language. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 1–22.

Fillenbaum, Samuel, 1986. The use of conditionals in inducements and deterrents. In Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, Meulen, Alice, Reilly, Judy Snitzer and Ferguson, Charles A., eds., On Conditionals. Cambridge University Press, 179–195.

Fillmore, Charles J., 1981. Pragmatics and the description of discourse. In Cole, Peter, ed., Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 143–166.

Fillmore, Charles J., 1996. The pragmatics of constructions. In Dan I. Slobin, ed., Social Interaction, Social Context, and Language: Essays in Honor of Susan Ervin-Tripp. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 53–69.

Fillmore, Charles J., Kay, Paul and O'Connor, Mary Catherine, 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: the case of let alone. Language 64: 501–538.

Firbas, Jan, 1964. On defining the theme in functional sentence analysis. Travaux linguistiques de Prague 1: 267–280.

Firbas, Jan, 1971. On the concept of communicative dynamism in the theory of functional sentence perspective. In Sborník prací filozofické fakulty brnĕnské univerzity A 19, 135–144.

Fodor, Janet Dean, 1984. Constraints on gaps: is the parser a significant influence? In Butterworth, Brian, Comrie, Bernard and Dahl, Östen, eds., Explanations for Language Universals. Berlin: Mouton, 9–34.

Fodor, Jerry A., 1983. The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Foley, William A. and Robert D. Van Valin, Jr., 1984. Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge University Press.

Foley, William A. and Robert D. Van Valin, Jr., 1985. Information packaging in the clause. In Timothy Shopen, ed., Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. I: Clause structure. Cambridge University Press, 282–364.

Ford, Cecilia E., 1993. Grammar in Interaction. Cambridge University Press.

Ford, Cecilia E. and Thompson, Sandra A., 1986. Conditionals in discourse: a text-based study from English. In Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, Ferguson, Charles A., Reilly, J. Snitzer and Meulen, A., eds., On Conditionals. Cambridge University Press.

Ford, Cecilia E. and Thompson, Sandra A., 1996. Interactional units in conversation: syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In Ochs, Elinor, Schegloff, Emanuel A. and Thompson, Sandra A., eds., Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge University Press, 134–184.

Ford, Cecilia E., Fox, Barbara A. and Thompson, Sandra A., 2001. Constituency and the grammar of turn increments. In Ford, Cecilia E., Fox, Barbara A. and Thompson, Sandra A., eds., The Language of Turn and Sequence. Oxford University Press.

Fox, Barbara A. and Jasperson, Robert, 1995. A syntactic exploration of repair in English conversation. In Davis, Philip W., ed., Alternative Linguistics: Descriptive and Theoretical Modes (Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science IV: Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 102). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 77–134.

Fox, Barbara A., Hayashi, Makato and Jasperson, Robert, 1996. Resources and repair: a cross-linguistic study of syntax and repair. In Ochs, Elinor, Schegloff, Emanuel A. and Thompson, Sandra A., eds., Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge University Press, 185–237.

Fox Tree, Jean E. and Clark, Herbert H., 1997. Pronouncing “the” as “thee” to signal problems in speaking. Cognition 62: 151–167.

Frescura, Marina, 2006. Reacting to a context-specific reprimand: a study of an Italian speech community. Journal of Pragmatics 38: 2144–2157.

Fretheim, Thorstein, 2001. In defense of monosemy. In Enikö, Németh T. and Bibok, Károly, eds., Pragmatics and the Flexibility of Word Meaning. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 79–115.

Frey, Werner, 2004. A medial topic position for German. Linguistische Berichte 198: 153–190.

Friedmann, Naama, 2001. Verb movement in agrammatic comprehension and production. Linguistics Department Colloquium, November 1, 2001.

Fromkin, Victoria A., 1991. Language and brain: redefining the goals and methodology of linguistics. In Kasher, Asa, ed., The Chomskyan Turn. Oxford: Blackwell, 78–103.

Fuerst, Yael, 2004. When information is redundant-redundant: redundancy and cognitive status. Seminar paper, Tel Aviv University.

Gafter, Roey, 2008. Where they linger on: motivating the current distribution of plural feminine pronouns in Hebrew. Dept of Linguistics, Tel Aviv University.

Gamut, L. T. F., 1991. Logic, Language, and Meaning, vol. I: Introduction to Logic. University of Chicago Press.

Gardner, Howard, Brownell, Hiram H., Wapner, Wendy and Michelow, Diane, 1983. Missing the point: the role of the right hemisphere in the processing of complex linguistic materials. In Perecman, Ellen, ed., Cognitive Processes in the Right Hemisphere. New York: Academic Press, 169–191.

Gazdar, Gerald, 1979. Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form. New York: Academic Press.

Geis, Michael L, 1984. On semantic and pragmatic competence. In Deborah Schiffrin, ed., Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications (Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, 71–84.

Geis, Michael L. and Zwicky, Arnold M., 1971. On invited inferences. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 561–566.

Gernsbacher, Morton Ann, 1990. Language Comprehension as Structure Building. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Gernsbacher, Morton Ann, 1991. Comprehending conceptual anaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes 6: 81–105.

Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr., 1994. The Poetics of Mind. Cambridge University Press.

Giles, Howard, 1973. Accent mobility: a model and some data. Anthropological Linguistics 15: 87–105.

Giles, Howard, Coupland, Justine and Coupland, Nicholas, 1991a. Contexts of Accommodation: Developments in Applied Sociolinguistics (Studies in Emotion and Social Interaction). Cambridge University Press.

Giles, Howard, Coupland, Nicholas and Coupland, Justine, 1991b. Accommodation theory: communication, context, and consequence. In Giles, Howard, Coupland, Justine and Coupland, Nicholas, eds., Contexts of Accommodation: Developments in Applied Sociolinguistics (Studies in Emotion and Social Interaction). Cambridge University Press, 1–68.

Giora, Rachel, 1985a. A text-based analysis of non-narrative texts. Theoretical Linguistics 12: 115–135.

Giora, Rachel, 1985b. Notes towards a theory of text coherence. Poetics Today 6: 699–715.

Giora, Rachel, 1997a. Discourse coherence and theory of relevance: stumbling blocks in search of a unified theory. Journal of Pragmatics 27: 17–34.

Giora, Rachel, 1997b. Understanding figurative and literal language: the graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics 8: 183–206.

Giora, Rachel, 1998. Discourse coherence is an independent notion: a reply to Deirdre Wilson. Journal of Pragmatics 29: 75–86.

Giora, Rachel, 1999. On the priority of salient meanings: studies of literal and figurative language. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 919–929.

Giora, Rachel, 2003. On our Mind: Salience, Context, and Figurative Language. New York: Oxford University Press.

Giora, Rachel, 2006. Anything negatives can do affirmatives can do just as well, except for some metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics 38: 981–1014.

Givón, Talmy, 1976. Topic, pronoun and grammatical agreement. In Charles N. Li, ed., Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press, 149–188.

Givón, Talmy, 1979a. On Understanding Grammar (Perspectives in Neurolinguistics and Psycholinguistics). New York: Academic Press.

Givón, Talmy, 1979b. Preface. In Talmy Givón, ed., Syntax and Semantics, vol. XII: Discourse and syntax. New York: Academic Press, xiii–xx.

Givón, Talmy ed., 1979c. Discourse and Syntax. New York: Academic Press.

Givón, Talmy, 1984. Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction, vol. I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Givón, Talmy, 1989. Mind, Code and Context. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Givón, Talmy, 1991. Isomorphism in the grammatical code: cognitive and biological considerations. Studies in Language 15: 85–114.

Glucksberg, Sam and Keysar, Boaz, 1990. Understanding metaphorical comparisons: beyond similarity. Psychological Review 97: 3–18.

Goldberg, Adele E., 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. University of Chicago Press.

Goldberg, Adele E., 1997. The relationship between verbs and constructions. In Verspoor, Marjolijn, Lee, Kee Dong and Sweetser, Eve, eds., Lexical and Syntactical Constructions and the Construction of Meaning: Proceedings of the Bi-Annual ICLA Meeting in Albuquerque, July 1995. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 383–398.

Goldberg, Adele E., 2004. Pragmatics and argument structure. In Horn, Laurence R. and Ward, Gregory L., eds., Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell, 427–441.

Goldberg, Adele E., 2006. Constructions at Work. Oxford University Press.

Goldberg, Adele E. and Ackerman, Farrell, 2001. The pragmatics of obligatory adjuncts. Language 77: 798–814.

Goodwin, Charles, 1979. The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In George Psathas, ed., Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington Publishers, 97–121.

Gordon, David and Lakoff, George, 1971. Conversational postulates. In Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society 7: 63–84. (Reprinted in Cole and Morgan, eds., 1975, 83–106).

Green, Georgia M., 1981. Pragmatics and syntactic description. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 11: 27–38.

Green, Georgia M., 1989. Pragmatics and Natural Language Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Green, Georgia M., 2004. Some interactions of pragmatics and grammar. In Horn, Laurence R. and Ward, Gregory L., eds., Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford University Press, 407–426.

Green, Georgia M. and Morgan, Jerry L., 1981. Pragmatics, grammar and discourse. In Morgan, Jerry L. and Cole, Peter, eds., Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 167–181.

Grice, H. Paul, 1975. Logic and conversation. In Cole, Peter and Morgan, Jerry L., eds., Syntax and Semantics, vol. III: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, 41–58.

Grice, H. Paul, 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Gries, Stefan Th., 2003. Towards a corpus-based identification of prototypical instances of constructions. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 1: 1–28.

Groenendijk, Jeroen A. G. and Stokhof, Martin J. B., 1978. Semantics, pragmatics and the theory of meaning. Journal of Pragmatics 2: 49–70.

Groenendijk, Jeroen A. G. and Stokhof, Martin J. B., 1984. Studies on the semantics of questions and the pragmatics of answers. Ms. Amsterdam University.

Grundy, Peter, 1995. Doing Pragmatics. London: Edward Arnold.

Gumperz, John J., 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge University Press.

Gundel, Jeanette K. and Fretheim, Thorstein, 2004. Topic and focus. In Horn, Laurence R. and Ward, Gregory L., eds., Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell, 175–196.

Gundel, Jeanette K., Hedberg, Nancy and Zacharski, Ron, 1993. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69: 274–307.

Günthner, Susanne and Mutz, Karin, 2004. Grammaticalization vs. pragmaticalization? The development of pragmatic markers in German and Italian. In Bisang, Walter, Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. and Wiemer, Björn, eds., What Makes Grammaticalization? A Look from its Fringes and its Components. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 77–107.

Gussenhoven, Carlos, 2004. The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. Cambridge University Press.

Haberland, Hartmut and Mey, Jacob L., 1977. Editorial: Linguistics and pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics 1: 1–12.

Haiman, John, 1978. Conditionals are topics. Language 54: 564–589.

Haiman, John, 1998. Talk is Cheap. New York: Oxford University Press.

Haiman, John and Thompson, Sandra A., 1984. “Subordination” in universal grammar. In Brugman, Claudia and Macaulay, Monica, eds., Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 510–523.

Halliday, M. A. K., 1967. Notes on transitivity and theme in English, part 2. Journal of Linguistics 3: 199–244.

Halliday, M. A. K., 1978. Language as Social Semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, Ruqaiya, 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

Hankamer, Jorge and Sag, Ivan A., 1976. Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 7: 391–428.

Harder, Peter, 1996. Functional Semantics: A Theory of Meaning, Structure, and Tense in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Harnish, Robert M., 1976. Logical form and implicature. In Bever, Tom G., Katz, Jerrold J. and Langendoen, D. Terence, eds., An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Ability. New York: Crowell, 313–391.

Harnish, Robert M. and Farmer, Ann K., 1984. Pragmatics and the modularity of the linguistic system. Lingua 63: 255–277.

Haspelmath, Martin, 1997. Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Haugh, Michael, 2007. The co-constitution of politeness implicature in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 39: 84–110.

Hawkins, John A., 1994. A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 73). Cambridge University Press.

Hedberg, Nancy and Fadden, Lorna, 2007. The information structure of it-clefts, wh-clefts and reverse wh-clefts in English. In Hedberg, Nancy and Zacharski, Ron, eds., The Grammar-Pragmatics Interface. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 49–76.

Heine, Bernd, 1994. Grammaticalization as an explanatory parameter. In William Pagliuca, ed., Perspectives on Grammaticalization (Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science IV: Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 109). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 255–287.

Heisterkamp, Brian L., 2006. Conversational displays of mediator neutrality in court-based program. Journal of Pragmatics 38: 2051–2064.

Herrmann, Theo, 1983. Speech and Situation: A Psychological Conception of Situated Speaking. Heidelberg: Springer.

Hinds, John, 1979. Organizational patterns in discourse. In Givón, Talmy, ed., Syntax and Semantics, vol. XII: Discourse and syntax. New York: Academic Press, 135–157.

Hooper, Joan B. and Thompson, Sandra A., 1973. On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 465–497.

Hopper, Paul J., 2001. Grammatical constructions and their discourse origins: prototype or family resemblance? In Pütz, Martin, Niemeier, Suzanne and Dirven, Réne, eds., Applied Cognitive Linguistics I: Theory and Language Acquisition. Berlin: Mouton, 109–129.

Hopper, Paul J. and Thompson, Sandra A., 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56: 251–299.

Hopper, Paul J. and Thompson, Sandra A., 2001. Grammatical fragments and social action in conversation. Paper delivered at the 7th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference. UC Santa Barbara, July 22–27, 2001.

Hopper, Paul J. and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, 1993/2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.

Horn, Laurence R., 1972. On the semantic properties of the logical operators in English. Mimeo, Indiana University Linguistics Club.

Horn, Laurence R., 1978. Remarks on neg-raising. In Peter Cole, ed., Syntax and Semantics, vol. IX: Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 129–220.

Horn, Laurence R., 1984. A new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicatures. In Deborah Schiffrin, ed., Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications (Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, 11–42.

Horn, Laurence R., 1988. Pragmatic theory. In Newmeyer, Frederick J. and Robins, R. H., eds., Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, vol. I: Linguistic theory: Foundations. Cambridge University Press, 113–145.

Horn, Laurence R., 1989. A Natural History of Negation. University of Chicago Press.

Horn, Laurence R., 1991. Given as new: when redundant information isn't. Journal of Pragmatics 15: 313–336.

Horn, Laurence R., 2000a. Pick a theory (not just any theory): indiscriminative and free-choice indefinite. In Horn, Laurence R. and Kato, Yasuhiko, eds., Negation and Polarity: Syntactic and Semantic Perspectives. Oxford University Press, 147–192.

Horn, Laurence R., 2000b. From if to iff: conditional perfection as pragmatic strengthening. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 289–326.

Horn, Laurence R., 2002. Assertoric inertia and NPI licensing. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Part 2: The panels, 55–82.

Horn, Laurence R., 2004. Implicature. In Horn, Laurence R. and Ward, Gregory L., eds., Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell, 3–28.

Horn, Laurence R., 2006a. The Border Wars: a neo-Gricean perspective. In Turner, Ken and Heusinger, Klaus, eds., Where Semantics Meets Pragmatics. London: Elsevier, 21–48.

Horn, Laurence R., 2006b. More issues in neo- and post-Gricean pragmatics: a response to Robyn Carston's response. Intercultural Pragmatics 3: 81–93.

Horn, Laurence R., 2007. Toward a Fregean pragmatics: Voraussetzung, Nebengedanke, Andeutung. In Kecskes, Istvan and Horn, Laurence R., eds., Explorations in Pragmatics: Linguistic, Cognitive, and Intercultural Aspects. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter, 39–69.

Horn, Laurence R., 2008. On F-implicature: myth-analysis and rehabilitation. Paper presented at Linguistics and Philosophy Workshop, Ann Arbor, available at www.eecs.umich.edu/~rthomaso/lpw08/abstracts.html.

Horn, Laurence R. and Ward, Gregory L., eds., 2004. Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell.

Hornstein, Norbert, 1986. Pragmatics and grammatical theory. In Farley, Anne M., Farley, Peter T. and McCullough, Karl-Erik, eds., Papers from the Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Theory. Chicago Linguistic Society, 234–247.

House, Jill, 2006. Constructing a context with intonation. Journal of Pragmatics 38: 1542–1558.

Huang, Yan, 2007. Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.

Hunston, Susan and Sinclair, John M., 2000. A local grammar of evaluation. In Hunston, Susan and Sinclair, John M., eds., Evaluation in Text. Oxford University Press, 74–101.

Hyman, Larry M. and Comrie, Bernard, 1981. Logophoric reference in Gokana. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 3: 19–37.

Israel, Michael, 2000. Some and the pragmatics of indefinite construal. In Chang, Steve S., Liaw, Lily and Ruppenhofer, Josef, eds., Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 169–182.

Israel, Michael, 2002. Literally speaking. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 423–432.

Iwasaki, Shoichi and Tao, Hongyin, 1993. A comparative study of the structure of the intonation unit in English, Japanese, and Mandarin Chinese. Paper presented at The 67th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Los Angeles, CA.

Izre'el, Shlomo, 2002. A corpus of Spoken Israeli Hebrew (CoSIH): text examples. Leshonenu 64: 289–314 (in Hebrew).

Jackendoff, Ray, 2008. Construction after construction and its theoretical challenges. Language 84: 8–28.

Jaeger, Jeri J., Lockwood, Alan H., Kemmerer, David L., Valin, Robert D., Jr., Murphy, Brian W. and Khalak, Hanif G., 1996. A positron emission tomographic study of regular and irregular verb morphology in English. Language 72: 451–497.

Jefferson, Gail, 1983. “Conjunctionals” as overlap vulnerable. Two explorations of the organization of overlapping talk in conversation. Tilburg Papers in Language and Literature 28: 1–33.

Jucker, Andreas H. and Ziv, Yael, eds., 1998. Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 57). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Jung-Beeman, Mark, Bowden, Edward M. and Gernsbacher, Morton Ann, 2000. Right and left hemisphere cooperation for drawing predictive and coherence inferences during normal story comprehension. Brain and Language 71: 310–336.

Kadmon, Nirit, 2001. Formal Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell.

Kadmon, Nirit, 2009. Some theories of the interpretation of accent placement. Unpublished ms., Tel Aviv University.

Kamp, Hans, 1979. Semantics versus pragmatics. In Guenthner, Franz and Schmidt, S. J., eds., Formal Semantics and Pragmatics for Natural Languages (Synthese Language Library 4). Dordrecht: Reidel, 255–287.

Kamp, Hans, 2001. Presupposition computation and presupposition justification: one aspect of the interpretation of multi-sentence discourse. In Bras, Myriam and Vieu, Laure, eds., Semantics and Pragmatic Issues in Discourse and Dialogue: Experimenting with Current Dynamic Theories. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 57–84.

Kamp, Hans and Reyle, Uwe, 1993. From Discourse to Logic. Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Kaplan, David, 1977/1989. Demonstratives. In Almog, Joseph, Wettstein, Howard K. and Perry, John, eds., Themes from Kaplan. New York: Oxford University Press, 481–563.

Karmiloff-Smith, Annette, 1991. Beyond modularity: innate constraints and developmental change. In Carey, Susan and Gelman, Rochel, eds., The Epigenesis of Mind: Essays on Biology and Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 171–197.

Karttunen, Lauri, 1973. Presuppositions of compound sentences. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 169–193.

Karttunen, Lauri, 1974. On the pragmatic and semantic aspects of meaning. Paper presented at the 11th Annual Philosophy Colloquium.

Karttunen, Lauri and Peters, Stanley, 1979. Conventional implicature. In Oh, Choon-Kyu and Dinneen, David A., eds., Syntax and Semantics, vol. XI: Presupposition. New York: Academic Press, 1–56.

Kasher, Asa, 1974. Mood imp's: a logical way of doing generative pragmatics. Theoretical Linguistics 1: 6–38.

Kasher, Asa, 1977. What is a theory of use?Journal of Pragmatics 1: 105–120.

Kasher, Asa, 1979. Logical rationalism and formal semantics of natural languages: On conditions of adequacy. In Heny, Frank and Schnelle, Helmut, eds., Syntax and Semantics, vol. X: Selections from the third Groningen round table. New York: Academic Press, 257–273.

Kasher, Asa, 1982. Gricean inference revisited. Philosophica 29: 25–44.

Kasher, Asa, 1991a. Pragmatics and the modularity of mind. In Steven Davis, ed., Pragmatics: A Reader. New York: Oxford University Press, 567–582.

Kasher, Asa, 1991b. Pragmatics and Chomsky's research program. In Asa Kasher, ed., The Chomskyan Turn. Cambridge: Blackwell, 122–149.

Kasher, Asa, 1994. Rationality and pragmatics. In Asher, R. E. and Simpson, J. M. Y., eds., The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, vol. VI. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 3280–3282.

Kasher, Asa, 1998a. Pragmatics, modular. In Jacob L. Mey, ed., Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 738–739.

Kasher, Asa ed., 1998b. Pragmatics: Critical Concepts (6 volumes). London: Routledge.

Kasher, Asa, Batori, Gila, Soroker, Nachum, Graves, David and Zaidel, Eran, 1999. Effects of right- and left-hemisphere damage on understanding conversational implicatures. Brain and Language 68: 566–590.

Katriel, Tamar, 2004. Dialogic Moments. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

Katz, Jerrold J., 1977. Propositional Structure and Illocutionary Force: A Study of the Contribution of Sentence Meaning to Speech Acts. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.

Kay, Paul, 1983. Linguistic competence and folk theories of language: two English hedges. In Dahlstrom, Amy, Brugman, Claudia, Macaulay, Monica, Civkulis, Inese, Emanatian, Michele, Sakima, Donna and Teixeira, Raquel, eds., Proceedings of the 9th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 128–137.

Kay, Paul, 2004. Pragmatic aspects of grammatical constructions. In Horn, Laurence R. and Ward, Gregory L., eds., Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford University Press, 675–700.

Keenan, Edward L., 1996. Creating anaphors: an historical study of the English reflexive pronouns. Unpublished ms., UCLA.

Keller, Rudi, 1995. The epistemic weil. In Stein, Dieter and Wright, Susan, eds., Subjectivity and Subjectivisation: Linguistic Perspectives. Cambridge University Press, 16–30.

Kemmer, Suzanne and Shyldkrot, Hava Bat-Zeev, 1995. The semantics of “empty prepositions” in French. In Eugene H. Cassad, ed., Cognitive Linguistics in the Redwoods. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 347–388.

Kempson, Ruth M., 1975. Presupposition and the Delimitation of Semantics (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 15). Cambridge University Press.

Kempson, Ruth M., 1977. Semantic Theory. Cambridge University Press.

Kempson, Ruth M., 1984. Weak crossover, logical form and pragmatics. Paper presented at GLOW, April 1984.

Kempson, Ruth M., 1986. Ambiguity and the semantics-pragmatics distinction. In Charles Travis, ed., Meaning and Interpretation. Oxford: Blackwell, 77–103.

Kempson, Ruth M., 1988. Grammar and conversational principles. In Newmeyer, Frederick J. and Robins, R. H., eds., Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, vol. II: Linguistic Theory: Extensions and Implications. Cambridge University Press, 139–163.

Kempson, Ruth M., 2000. Pragmatics: language and communication. In Aronoff, Mark and Rees-Miller, Janie, eds., The Handbook of Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 394–427.

Kempson, Ruth M., Cann, Ronnie and Purver, Matthew, to appear. Talking and listening: dialogue and the grammar–pragmatics interface. In Hackl, Martin and Thornton, Robert, eds., Asserting, Meaning and Implying. Oxford University Press.

Kiefer, Ferenc, 1978. Review of Jens Allwood's Linguistic Communication as Action and Cooperation: A Study in Pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics 2: 293–304.

Kim, Heesoo, 2008. The semantic and pragmatic analysis of South Korean and Australian English apologetic speech acts. Journal of Pragmatics 40: 257–278.

Klein-Andreu, Flora, 1983. Preface. In Flora Klein-Andreu, ed., Discourse Perspectives on Syntax. New York: Academic Press, xv–xvii.

Kopytko, Roman, 2001. From Cartesian towards non-Cartesian pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 783–804.

Koriat, Asher and Greenberg, Seth N., 1996. The enhancement effect in letter detection: further evidence for the structural model of reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology 22: 1184–1195.

Kotek, Hadas, 2009. Taking Hebrew into account. Ms., Tel Aviv University.

Krámský, Jirí, 1972. The Article and the Concept of Definiteness in Language (Janua Linguarum, Series Minor 125). The Hague: Mouton.

Kügler, Frank, Skopeteas, Stavros and Verhoeven, Elisabeth, 2007. Encoding information structure in Yucatec Maya: on the interplay of prosody and syntax. Working Papers of the Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure (ISIS)SFB 632 8: 187–208.

Kuno, Susumu, 1971. The position of locatives in existential sentences. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 333–378.

Kuno, Susumu, 1972. Functional sentence perspective: a case study from Japanese and English. Linguistic Inquiry 3: 269–320.

Kuno, Susumu, 1973. The Structure of the Japanese Language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Kuno, Susumu, 1975. Three perspectives in the functional approach to syntax. In Grossman, Robin E., San, L. James and Vance, Timothy J., eds., Papers from the Parasession on Functionalism (1st edition). Chicago Linguistic Society, 276–336.

Kuno, Susumu, 1976. Subject, theme, and the speaker's empathy: a reexamination of relativization phenomena. In Charles N. Li, ed., Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press, 417–444.

Kuno, Susumu, 1987. Functional Syntax: Anaphora, Discourse, and Empathy. Chicago University Press.

Kutas, Marta and Hillyard, S. A., 1980. Event-related brain potentials to semantically inappropriate and surprisingly large words. Biological Psychology 11: 99–116.

Kuzar, Ron, 2006. Prototype-based semantics of existential constructions. Ms., Haifa University.

Kuzar, Ron, 2009. Sentence patterns in English and Hebrew. Unpublished ms., Haifa University.

Labov, William, 1972. Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular (Conduct and Communication 3). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Labov, William, 1973. The boundaries of words and their meanings. In Bailey, Charles-James N. and Shuy, Roger W., eds., New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, 340–373.

Ladd, D. Robert, 1990. Intonation: emotion vs. grammar. Language 66: 806–816.

Ladusaw, William A., 1988. Semantic theory. In Newmeyer, Frederick J. and Robins, R. H., eds., Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, vol. I: Linguistic theory: Foundations. Cambridge University Press, 89–112.

Lakoff, George, 1973a. Fuzzy grammar and the performance/competence terminology game. In Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society, vol. 9, 271–291.

Lakoff, George, 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark, 1980. Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, Robin, 1973b. The logic of politeness; or, minding your P's and Q's. In Claudia Corum, T. Cedric Smith-Stark and Ann Weiser, eds., Papers from the 9th Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago Linguistic Society, 292–305.

Lambrecht, Knud, 1980. Topic, French style. Remarks about a basic sentence type of modern non-standard French. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 337–360.

Lambrecht, Knud, 1986. Pragmatically motivated syntax: presentational cleft constructions in spoken French. In Proceedings of the Twenty-second Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Papers from the Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Theory. Chicago Linguistic Society, 115–126.

Lambrecht, Knud, 1990. “What, me worry” – Mad magazine sentences revisited. In Hall, Kira, Koenig, Jean-Pierre, Meacham, Michael, Reinman, Sondra and Sutton, Laurel A., eds., Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 215–228.

Lambrecht, Knud, 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 71). Cambridge University Press.

Landau, Barbara and Gleitman, Lila R., 1985. Language and Experience: Evidence from the Blind Child. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Landman, Fred, 2000. Events and Plurality. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Langacker, Ronald W., 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford University Press.

Langacker, Ronald W., 1988. A usage-based model. In Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn, ed., Topics in Cognitive Linguistics (Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science IV: Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 50). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 127–161.

Langacker, Ronald W., 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. II: Descriptive Application. Stanford University Press.

Langacker, Ronald W., 1997. The contextual basis of cognitive semantics. In Nuyts, Jan and Pederson, Eric, eds., Language and Conceptualization (Language, Culture and Cognition 1). Cambridge University Press, 229–252.

Lasnik, Howard, 1989. Essays on Anaphora (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Latraverse, François and Leblanc, Suzanne, 1980. On the delimitation of semantics and the characterization of meaning: some remarks. In Parret, Herman, Sbisa, Marina and Verschueren, Jef, eds., Possibilities and Limitations of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 399–411.

Leech, Geoffrey N., 1980. Explorations in Semantics and Pragmatics (Pragmatics and Beyond 5). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Leech, Geoffrey N., 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.

Leonard, Carol L., Waters, Gloria S. and Caplan, David, 1997. The use of contextual information related to general world knowledge by right brain-damaged individuals in pronoun resolution. Brain and Language 57: 343–359.

Levelt, Willem J. M., 1993. Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Levin, Beth and Rapoport, Tova R., 1988. Lexical subordination. In MacLeod, Lynne, Larson, Gary and Brentari, Diane, eds., Papers from the 24th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago Linguistic Society, 275–289.

Levinson, Stephen C., 1979. Pragmatics and social deixis: reclaiming the notion of conventional implicature. Paper presented at Berkeley Linguistics Society.

Levinson, Stephen C., 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.

Levinson, Stephen C., 1987. Minimization and conversational inference. In Verschueren, Jef and Bertuccelli-Papi, Marcella, eds., The Pragmatic Perspective (Pragmatics and Beyond Companion Series 5). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 61–129.

Levinson, Stephen C., 1991. Pragmatic reduction of the binding conditions revisited. Journal of Linguistics 27: 107–161.

Levinson, Stephen C., 1995. Three levels of meaning. In Frank R. Palmer, ed., Grammar and Meaning. Cambridge University Press, 90–115.

Levinson, Stephen C., 2000. Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Lewis, David K., 1972. General semantics. In Davidson, Donald and Harman, Gilbert, eds., Semantics of Natural Language. Dordrecht: Reidel, 169–218.

Li, Charles N., 1976. Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press.

Li, Charles N. and Thompson, Sandra A., 1976. Subject and topic: a new typology of language. In Charles N. Li, ed., Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press, 457–489.

Li, Charles N. and Sandra A. Thompson, 1981/1989. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Liberman, Mark, 1973. Alternatives. In Chicago Linguistic Society 9. Chicago Linguistic Society, 346–355.

Liberman, Mark and Sag, Ivan, 1974. Prosodic form and discourse function. In Papers from the 10th Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, 416–427.

Linzen, Tal, 2009. Hebrew possessive datives: corpus evidence for the role of affectedness. M.A. thesis, Tel Aviv University.

Local, John and Kelly, John, 1986. Projection and ‘silences’: notes on phonetic and conversational structure. Human Studies 9: 185–204.

Longacre, Robert E., 1976. ‘Mystery’ particles and affixes. In Mufwene, Salikoko S., Walker, Carol A. and Steever, Sanford B., eds., Papers from the Twelfth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago Linguistic Society, 468–477.

Longacre, Robert E., 1979. The paragraph as a grammatical unit. In Talmy Givón, ed., Syntax and Semantics, vol. XII: Discourse and Syntax. New York: Academic Press, 115–134.

Lycan, William G., 1991. Even and even if. Linguistics and Philosophy 14: 115–150.

Lyons, John, 1977. Semantics (2 volumes). Cambridge University Press.

Lyons, John, 1995. Grammar and meaning. In Frank R. Palmer, ed., Grammar and Meaning. Cambridge University Press, 221–249.

Macmillan, , 2002. Macmillan's English Dictionary for Advanced Learners 2002. Oxford: Macmillan.

Mann, William C. and Thompson, Sandra A., 1986. Relational propositions in discourse. Discourse Processes 9: 57–90.

Mann, William C. and Thompson, Sandra A. 1988. Rhetorical structure theory: toward a functional theory of text organization. Text 8: 243–281.

Martin, Larry W., Bradac, James J. and Elliott, Norman D., 1977. On the empirical basis of linguistics: a multivariate analysis of sentence judgments. In Beach, Woodford A., Fox, Samuel E. and Philosoph, Shulamith, eds., Papers from the Thirteenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago Linguistic Society, 357–371.

Maschler, Yael, 2001. Veke'ilu haragláyim sh'xa nitkao'ot bifnim kaze (‘and like your feet get stuck inside like’): Hebrew kaze (‘like’), ke'ilu (‘like’), and the decline of Israeli dugri (‘direct’) speech. Discourse Studies 3: 295–326.

Mashal, Nira and Faust, Miriam, 2008. Conventionalization of novel metaphors: a shift in hemispheric asymmetry. Ms., Bar-Ilan University.

Mashal, Nira, Faust, Miriam, Hendler, Talma and Jung-Beeman, Mark, 2008. Hemispheric differences in processing the literal interpretation of idioms: converging evidence from behavioral and fMRI studies. Cortex 44: 848–860.

Matthews, Peter, 1995. Syntax, semantics, pragmatics. In Frank R. Palmer, ed., Grammar and Meaning. Cambridge University Press, 48–60.

Matthiessen, Christian and Thompson, Sandra A., 1988. The structure of discourse and subordination. In Haiman, John and Thompson, Sandra A., eds., Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 275–329.

McCawley, James D., 1998. The Syntactic Phenomena of English. University of Chicago Press.

McCawley, James D., 1999. Why surface syntactic structure reflects logical structure as much as it does, but only that much. Language 75: 34–62.

McConnell-Ginet, Sally, 1998. Why do middles need modifiers? Adverbials reconsidered. Lecture given at Bar Ilan University, Israel, June 1998.

McCrone, John, 1999. States of mind. New Scientist 2178 (20 March): 30–33.

Merkl, Peter H., 2001. A Coup Attempt in Washington?New York: Palgrave.

Mey, Jacob L., 1979. Preface. In Jacob L. Mey, ed., Pragmalinguistics: Theory and Practice. The Hague: Mouton, 5–6.

Mey, Jacob L., 1993. Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell.

Mey, Jacob L., 1998a. Pragmatics. In Jacob L. Mey, ed., Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 716–737.

Mey, Jacob L. ed., 1998b. Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Michaelis, Laura A. and Lambrecht, Knud, 1994. On nominal extraposition: a constructional analysis. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 362–373.

Mithun, Marianne, 1987. Is basic word order universal? In Russell S. Tomlin, ed., Coherence and Grounding in Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 281–328.

Mithun, Marianne, 2008. The extension of dependency beyond the sentence. Language 84: 69–119.

Montgomery, Michael, 1989. Choosing between that and it. In Fasold, Ralph W. and Schiffrin, Deborah, eds., Language Change and Variation (Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science IV: Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 241–254.

Moravcsik, Julius M., 1990. Thought and Language. London: Routledge.

Morgan, Jerry L., 1978. Two types of convention in indirect speech acts. In Peter Cole, ed., Syntax and Semantics, vol. IX: Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 261–280.

Morris, Charles W., 1938. Foundations of the theory of signs. In Neurath, Otto, Carnap, Rudolf and Morris, Charles W., eds., International Encyclopedia of Unified Science. University of Chicago Press, 77–138.

Mulder, Jean and Thompson, Sandra A., 2008. The grammaticization of but as a final particle in English conversation. In Ritva Laury, ed., Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining: The Multifunctionality of Conjunctions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 179–204.

Naden, Anthony, 1986. Social context and Mampruli greetings. In Huttar, George and Gregerson, Kenneth, eds., Pragmatics in non-Western Perspective (Summer Institute of Linguistics Publications in Linguistics 73). Arlington, Tex.: Summer Institute of Linguistics, 161–199.

Nemo, François, 1999. The pragmatics of signs, the semantics of relevance, and the semantics/pragmatics interface. In Ken Turner, ed., The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View. Oxford: Elsevier, 343–417.

Newmeyer, Frederick J., 1983. Grammatical Theory. University of Chicago Press.

Newmeyer, Frederick J., 1991. Iconicity and generative grammar. Language 68: 756–796.

Newmeyer, Frederick J., 2000. Language Form and Language Function. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Noordman, Leo G. M. and Blijzer, Femke, 2000. On the processing of causal relations. In Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Kortmann, Bernd, eds., Cause-Condition-Concession-Contrast: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 35–56.

Norrick, Neal R., 1987. Functions of repetitions in conversation. Text 7: 245–264.

Noveck, Ira A., 2001. When children are more logical than adults: experimental investigations of scalar implicature. Cognition 78: 165–188.

Nunberg, Geoffrey D., 1981. Validating pragmatic explanations. In Peter Cole, ed., Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 199–222.

Nunberg, Geoffrey D., 1993. Indexicality and deixis. Linguistics and Philosophy 16: 1–43.

Nureddeen, Abdurahman Fatima, 2008. Cross cultural pragmatics: apology strategies in Sudanese Arabic. Journal of Pragmatics 40: 279–306.

Nuyts, Jan, 1992. Aspects of a Cognitive-pragmatic Theory of Language: On Cognition, Functionalism, and Grammar (Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 20). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Ochs, Elinor, 1992. Indexing gender. In Duranti, Alessandro and Goodwin, Charles, eds., Rethinking Context. Cambridge University Press, 336–358.

Ochs Keenan, Elinor and Schieffelin, Bambi B., 1976. Topic as a discourse notion: a study of topic in the conversations of children and adults. In Charles N. Li, ed., Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press, 335–384.

Õim, Haldur, 1977. Towards a theory of linguistic pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics 1: 251–267.

Olshtain, Elite, 1989. Apologies cross languages. In Blumstein, Sheila E., House, Juliane and Kasper, Gabriele, eds., Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 155–173.

Ono, Tsuyoshi and Thompson, Sandra A., 1996. Interaction and syntax in the structure of conversational discourse: collaboration, overlap, and syntactic dissociation. In Hovy, Edward H. and Scott, Donia R., eds., Computational and Conversational Discourse: Burning Issues – An Interdisciplinary Account (NATO ASI Series F: Computer and Systems Sciences 151). Berlin: Springer, 67–96.

Osterhout, Lee and Holcomb, Phillip J., 1992. Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language 31: 785–806.

Osterhout, Lee, Bersick, Michael and McLaughlin, Judith, 1997. Brain potentials reflect violations of gender stereotypes. Memory and Cognition 25: 273–285.

Oswalt, Robert L., 1983. Interclausal reference in Kashaya. In Haiman, John and Munro, Pamela, eds., Switch-reference and Universal Grammar (Typological Studies in Language 2). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 267–290.

Panther, Klaus-Uwe and Thornburg, Linda L., 2009. From syntactic coordination to conceptual modification: the case of nice and Adj construction. Constructions and Frames 1: 56–86.

Parret, Herman, Sbisà, Marina and Verschueren, Jef, eds., 1981. Possibilities and Limitations of Pragmatics (Studies in Language Companion Series 7). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Pawley, Andrew and Snyder, Frances H., 1983. Two puzzles for linguistic theory: nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In Richards, Jack C. and Schmidt, Richard W., eds., Language and Communication. London: Longman, 191–225.

Payne, Doris L., 1987. Information structuring in Papago narrative. Language 63: 783–804.

Payne, Doris L., 1992. Nonidentifiable information and pragmatic order rules in ‘O'odham. In Doris L Payne, ed., Pragmatics of Word Order Flexibility. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 137–166.

Peleg, Orna, Giora, Rachel and Fein, Ofer, 2004. Contextual strength: the whens and hows of context effects. In Noveck, Ira A and Sperber, Dan, eds., Experimental Pragmatics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Peregrin, Jaroslav, 1999. The pragmatization of semantics. In Turner, Ken, ed., The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View. Oxford: Elsevier, 419–442.

Peters, Pamela, 1995. The Pocket Macquarie Writers' Guide. Milton, Queensland: The Jacaranda Press.

Pierrehumbert, Janet B. and Hirschberg, Julia Bell, 1990. The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In Cohen, Philip R., Morgan, Jerry L. and Pollack, Martha E., eds., Intentions in Communication (System Development Foundation Benchmark Series). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 271–311.

Pinker, Steven, 1989. Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Portner, Paul, 2006. Meaning. In Fasold, Ralph W. and Connor-Linton, Jeff, eds., An Introduction to Language and Linguistics. Cambridge University Press, 137–168.

Potts, Christopher, 2005. The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford University Press.

Prince, Ellen F., 1976. The syntax and semantics of Neg-Raising, with evidence from French. Language 52: 404–426.

Prince, Ellen F., 1978a. A comparison of WH-clefts and IT-clefts in discourse. Language 54: 883–906.

Prince, Ellen F., 1978b. On the function of existential presupposition in discourse. In Chicago Linguistic Society 14. Chicago Linguistic Society, 362–376.

Prince, Ellen F., 1981. On the inferencing of indefinite this NPs. In Joshi, Aravind K., Webber, Bonnie L. and Sag, Ivan A., eds., Elements of Discourse Understanding. Cambridge University Press, 231–250.

Prince, Ellen F., 1988. Discourse analysis: a part of the study of linguistic competence. In Newmeyer, Frederick J. and Robins, R. H., eds., Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, vol. II: Linguistic Theory: Extensions and Implications. Cambridge University Press, 164–182.

Prince, Ellen F., 1990. Syntax and discourse: a look at resumptive pronouns. In Hall, Kira, Koenig, Jean-Pierre, Meacham, Michael, Reinman, Sondra and Sutton, Laurel A., eds., Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 482–497.

Prince, Ellen F., 1998. On the limits of syntax, with reference to left-dislocation and topicalization. In Culicover, Peter W. and McNally, Louise, eds., Syntax and Semantics, vol. IXXX: The Limits of Syntax. San Diego: Academic Press, 281–302.

Prince, Ellen F., 2006. Impersonal pronouns in French and Yiddish: semantic reference vs. discourse reference. In Birner, Betty J. and Ward, Gregory L., eds., Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning: Neo-Gricean Studies in Pragmatics and Semantics in Honor of Laurence R Horn. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 295–315.

Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey N. and Svartvik, Jan, 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.

Raichle, Marcus E., 1998. The neural correlates of consciousness: an analysis of cognitive skill learning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B series 353: 1889–1901.

Recanati, François, 1987. Meaning and Force. Cambridge University Press.

Recanati, François, 1989. The pragmatics of what is said. Mind and Language 4: 295–328. (Reprinted in Davis 1991, 97–120).

Recanati, François, 1993. Direct Reference. Oxford: Blackwell.

Recanati, François, 1995. The alleged priority of literal interpretation. Cognitive Science 19: 207–232.

Recanati, François, 2001. “What is said.”Synthese 128: 75–91.

Recanati, François, 2002a. Unarticulated constituents. Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 299–345.

Recanati, François, 2002b. Does linguistic communication rest on inference?Mind and Language 17: 105–126.

Recanati, François, 2004a. ‘What is said’ and the semantics/pragmatics distinction. In Bianchi, Claudia and Penco, Carlo, eds., The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction. Proceedings from WOC 2002. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 45–64.

Recanati, François, 2004b. Pragmatics and semantics. In Horn, Laurence R. and Ward, Gregory L., eds., Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell, 442–462.

Reid, Wallis, 1991. Verb and Noun Number in English: A Functional Explanation (Longman Linguistics Library). London: Longman.

Reinhart, Tanya, 1981. Pragmatics and linguistics: an analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica 27: 53–94.

Rickford, John R., Mendoza-Denton, Norma, Wasow, Thomas A. and Espinoza, Juli, 1995. Syntactic variation and change in progress: loss of the verbal coda in topic-restricting as far as constructions. Language 71: 102–131.

Romaine, Suzanne, 1999. Communicating Gender. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Romaine, Suzanne, 2000. Language in Society: An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Oxford University Press.

Rosch, Eleanor and Mervis, C. B., 1975. Family resemblances: studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology 7: 573–605.

Rude, Noel, 1992. Word order and topicality in Nez Perce. In Doris L. Payne, ed., Pragmatics of Word Order Flexibility. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 193–208.

Rundquist, Suellen, 2007. Apologies – form and function: “I think it was your foot I was stepping on.” In Hedberg, Nancy and Zacharski, Ron, eds., The Grammar-Pragmatics Interface: Essays in Honor of Jeanette K. Gundel. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 293–312.

Rutherford, William E., 1970. Some observations concerning subordinate clauses in English. Language 46: 97–115.

Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel A. and Jefferson, Gail, 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50: 696–735.

Sadock, Jerrold M., 1974. Toward a Linguistic Theory of Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press.

Sadock, Jerrold M., 1977. Aspects of linguistic pragmatics. In Rogers, Andy, Wall, Bob and Murphy, John P., eds., Proceedings of the Texas Conference on Performatives, Presuppositions and Implicatures. Arlington, Va.: Center for Applied Linguistics, 67–78.

Sadock, Jerrold M., 1978. On testing for conversational implicature. In Peter Cole, ed., Syntax and Semantics, vol. IX: Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 281–297. (Reprinted in Kasher, 1998b, vol. IV, 315–31. Citations are made to Sadock 1998).

Sadock, Jerrold M., 1981. Almost. In Peter Cole, ed., Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 257–271.

Sadock, Jerrold M., 1984. Whither radical pragmatics? In Deborah Schiffrin, ed., Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications (Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, 139–149.

Sadock, Jerrold M., 1988. Speech act distinctions in grammar. In Newmeyer, Frederick J. and Robins, R. H., eds., Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, vol. II: Linguistic Theory: Extensions and Implications. Cambridge University Press, 183–197.

Sadock, Jerrold M. and Zwicky, Arnold M., 1985. Speech act distinctions in syntax. In Timothy Shopen, ed., Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. I: Clause Structure. Cambridge University Press, 155–196.

Sag, Ivan A., 1981. Formal semantics and extralinguistic context. In Peter Cole, ed., Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 273–294.

Sag, Ivan A. and Pollard, Carl, 1991. An integrated theory of complement control. Language 67: 63–113.

Sanford, Anthony J. and Garrod, Simon C., 1981. Understanding Written Language. Chichester: John Wiley and sons.

Saussure, Ferdinand, 1960. Course in General Linguistics. Edited by Charles Bally and Albert Sechehave, in collaboration with Albert Reidlinger. Translated from French by Wade Baskin. London: Peter Owen.

Schegloff, Emanuel A., 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, vol. I. Cambridge University Press.

Schiffrin, Deborah, 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge University Press.

Schiffrin, Deborah, 1994. Approaches to Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.

Schmerling, Susan F., 1978. Synonymy judgments as syntactic evidence. In Peter Cole, ed., Syntax and Semantics, vol. IX: Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 299–313.

Schneiderman, Eta I., Murasugi, Kumiko G. and Saddy, J. Douglas, 1992. Story arrangement ability in right brain-damaged patients. Brain and Language 43: 107–120.

Schütze, Carson T., 1996. The Empirical Base of Linguistics. Chicago University Press.

Searle, John R., 1979. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press.

Searle, John R., 1980. The background of meaning. In Searle, John R., Kiefer, Ferenc and Bierwisch, Manfred, eds., Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics (Synthese Language Library 10). Boston: Reidel, 221–232.

Segerdahl, Pär, 1996. Language Use: A Philosophical Investigation into the Basic Notions of Pragmatics (Swansea Studies in Philosophy). London: Macmillan.

Sevi, Aldo, 2005. Exhaustivity: a semantic account of ‘quantity’ implicatures. Ph.D. dissertation, Tel Aviv University.

Silverstein, Michael, 1976. Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In Basso, Keith and Selby, Henry A., eds., Meaning in Anthropology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 11–55.

Silverstein, Michael, 1977. Cultural prerequisites to grammatical analysis. In Muriel Saville-Troike, ed., Linguistics and Anthropology. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, 139–151.

Silverstein, Michael, 1985. Language and the culture of gender: at the intersection of structure, usage, and ideology. In Mertz, Elizabeth and Parmentier, Richard, eds., Semiotic Mediation. Orlando: Academic Press, 220–259.

Silverstein, Michael, 1987. Shifters, linguistic categories and cultural description. In Meaning in anthropology. Santa Fe, New Mexico: School of American Research Advanced Seminar Series. Reprinted in Ben G. Blount ed., Language, culture, and society. Prospect Heights, Illinois: Waveland Press, 187–221.

Silverstein, Michael, 1993. Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In John A. Lucy, ed., Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge University Press, 33–58.

Sinclair, John M., 1987. Grammar in the dictionary. In John M. Sinclair, ed., Looking up: An Account of the COBUILD Project in Lexical Computing. London: Harper Collins.

Sinclair, John M., 1991. Corpus, Concordance Collocation. Oxford University Press.

Sinclair, John M., 1992. Trust the text. In Davies, Martin and Ravelli, Louise, eds., Advances in Systemic Linguistics: Recent Theory and Practice (Open Linguistics Series). London: Pinter, 5–19.

Sinclair, John M. and Renouf, Antoinette, 1991. Collocational frameworks in English. In Aijmer, Karin and Altenberg, Bengt, eds., English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honor of Jan Svartvik. London: Longman, 128–144.

Smith, Vicky L. and Clark, Herbert H., 1993. On the course of answering questions. Journal of Memory and Language 32: 25–38.

Solan, Lawrence M. and Tiersma, Peter M., 2005. Speaking of Crime: The Language of Criminal Justice (Chicago Series in Law and Society). University of Chicago Press.

Sotaro, Kita and Ide, Sachiko, 2007. Nodding, aizuchi, and final particles in Japanese conversation: how conversation reflects the ideology of communication and social relationships. Journal of Pragmatics 39: 1242–1254.

Sperber, Dan, 1994. The modularity of thought and the epidemiology of representations. In Hirschfield, L. and Gelman, S., eds., Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture. Cambridge University Press, 39–67.

Sperber, Dan, 2002. In defense of massive modularity. In Emmanuel Dupoux, ed., Language, Brain, and Cognitive Development: Essays in Honor of Jacques Mehler. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 47–57.

Sperber, Dan and Wilson, Deirdre, 1981. Irony and the use-mention distinction. In Peter Cole, ed., Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 295–318.

Sperber, Dan and Wilson, Deirdre, 1986. Pragmatics and modularity. In Farley, Anne M., Farley, Peter T. and McCullough, Karl-Erik, eds., Papers from the Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Theory. Chicago Linguistic Society, 67–84.

Sperber, Dan and Wilson, Deirdre, 1986/1995. Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.

Sperber, Dan and Wilson, Deirdre, 2002. Pragmatics, modularity and mindreading. Mind and Language 17: 3–23.

Sperber, Dan and Wilson, Deirdre, 2005. Pragmatics. In Jackson, Frank and Michael, Smith, eds., Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 468–501.

Stalnaker, Robert C., 1972. Pragmatics. In Davidson, Donald and Harman, Gilbert, eds., Semantics of Natural Language. Dordrecht: Reidel, 380–397.

Stanley, Jason, 2000. Context and logical form. Linguistics and Philosophy 23: 391–434.

Stanley, Jason, 2005. Review of Francois Recanati's Literal Meaning. Notre Dame Philosophical Review 9.

Stefanowitsch, Anatol and Gries, Stefan Th., 2003. Collostructions: investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8: 209–243.

Stirling, Lesley, 1993. Switch-reference and Discourse Representation (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 63). Cambridge University Press.

Stringaris, Argyris K., Medford, Nicholas C., Giampietro, Vincent, Brammer, Michael J. and Davids, Anthony S., 2007. Deriving meaning: distinct neural mechanisms for metaphoric, literal, and non-meaningful sentences. Brain and Language 100: 150–162.

Sundberg Meyer, Karen, 1992. Word order in Klamath. In Doris L. Payne, ed., Pragmatics of Word Order Flexibility. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 167–192.

Sweetser, Eve, 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 54). Cambridge University Press.

Swinney, David A., 1979. Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18: 645–659.

Szabolcsi, Anna, 1997. Strategies for scope taking. In Anna Szabolcsi, ed., Ways of Scope Taking. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 109–154.

Szatrowski, Polly, 2002. Syntactic projectability and co-participant completion in Japanese conversation. In Larson, Julie and Paster, Mary, eds., Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 315–326.

Talmy, Leonard, 1985. Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In Shopen, Timothy, ed., Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon. Cambridge University Press, 36–149.

Tannen, Deborah, 1987. Repetition in conversation: toward a poetics of talk. Language 63: 574–605.

Taub-Tabib, Hillel, 2009. A multifactorial analysis of subject-verb inversion in Hebrew intransitive clauses. M.A. thesis, Tel Aviv University.

Taylor, John R., 1995. Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Thomas, Jenny, 1995. Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. London: Longman.

Thompson, Sandra A., 1990. Information flow and dative shift in English discourse. In Edmondson, Jerold A., Feagin, Crawford and Mühlhäsler, Peter, eds., Development and Diversity: Language Variation across Time and Space (Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington Publications in Linguistics 93). Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics and University of Texas at Arlington, 239–253.

Thompson, Sandra A. 2002. “Object complements” and conversation: towards a realistic account. Studies in Language 26: 125–163.

Thompson, Sandra A. and Longacre, Robert E., 1985. Adverbial clauses. In Timothy Shopen, ed., Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. II: Complex Constructions. Cambridge University Press, 171–234.

Tomasello, Michael, 1992. First Verbs: A Case Study of Early Grammatical Development. Cambridge University Press.

Tomasello, Michael, 2003. Constructing a Language. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Tomlin, Russell S. and Rhodes, Richard, 1992. Information distribution in Ojibwa. In Doris L. Payne, ed., Pragmatics of Word Order Flexibility. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 117–136.

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, 1988. Pragmatic strengthening and grammaticalization. In Berkeley Linguistics Society 14. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 406–416.

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, 2003. Constructions in grammaticalizations. In Joseph, Brian D. and Janda, Richard D., eds., The Handbook of Historical Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 624–647.

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, 2008. Workshop on grammaticalization, pragmaticalization and/or (inter)subjectification: methodological issues for the study of discourse markers: comments. Paper presented at 4th International conference ‘New Reflections on Grammaticalization,’Leuven, Belgium, July 17, 2008.

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and König, Ekkehard, 1991. The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Heine, Bernd, eds., Approaches to Grammaticalization, vol. I: Focus on theoretical and methodological issues (Typological Studies in Language 19: 1). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 189–219.

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Dasher, Richard B., 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 97). Cambridge University Press.

Travis, Charles, 1997. Pragmatics. In Hale, Bob and Wright, Crispin, eds., A Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Blackwell, 87–107.

Tsohatzidis, Savas L., 1992. Pronouns of address and truth conditions. Linguistics 30: 569–575.

Turner, Ken, ed., 1999. The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View. Oxford: Elsevier.

Ueno, Noriko Fujii, 1987. Functions of the theme marker wa from synchronic and diachronic perspectives. In Hinds, John, Iwasaki, Shoichi and Maynard, Senko K., eds., Perspectives on Topicalization: The Case of Japanese wa (Typological Studies in Language 14). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 221–263.

Vallduví, E., 1990. The informational component. Ms., Dept. of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania.

Vallée, Richard, 2008. Conventional implicature revisited. Journal of Pragmatics 40: 407–430.

Verhagen, Arie, 2005. Constructions of Intersubjectivity. Oxford University Press.

Verhagen, Arie, 2006. On subjectivity and “long distance Wh-movement.” In Athanasiadou, Angeliki, Canakis, Costas and Cornillie, Bert, eds., Subjectification: Various Paths to Subjectivity. New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 323–346.

Verschueren, Jef, 1978. Reflections on presupposition failure: a contribution to an integrated theory of pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics 2: 107–152.

Verschueren, Jef, 1995. The pragmatic perspective. In Verschueren, Jef, Östman, Jan-Ola, Blommaert, Jan and Bulcaen, Chris, eds., Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1–19.

Verschueren, Jef, Östman, Jan-Ola, Blommaert, Jan and Bulcaen, Chris, eds., 1995. Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Vincent, Jocelyne M. and Castelfranchi, Cristiano, 1981. On the art of deception: how to lie while saying the truth. In Parret, Herman, Sbisà, Marina and Verschueren, Jef, eds., Possibilities and Limitations of Pragmatics (Studies in Language Companion Series 7). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 749–777.

Ward, Gregory L., 1988. The Semantics and Pragmatics of Preposing. New York: Garland.

Ward, Gregory L., 1990. The discourse functions of VP preposing. Language 66: 742–763.

Ward, Gregory L. and Hirschberg, Julia Bell, 1985. Implicating uncertainty: the pragmatics of fall-rise intonation. Language 61: 747–776.

Ward, Gregory L. and Birner, Betty J., 2004. Information structure and non-canonical syntax. In Horn, Laurence R. and Ward, Gregory L., eds., Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell, 153–174.

Wasow, Thomas A., 2002. Postverbal Behavior. Stanford: CSLI.

Wei, Li and Mayouf, Ali Mayouf, 2008. The effects of the social status of the elderly in Libya on the way they institutionally interact and communicate with younger physicians. Journal of Pragmatics 41: 136–146.

Weigand, Edda, 1998. Contrastive lexical semantics. In Edda Weigand, ed., Contrastive Lexical Semantics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 25–44.

Wennerstrom, Ann, 2001. Intonation and evaluation in oral narratives. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1183–1206.

Weylman, Sally T., Brownell, Hiram H., Roman, Mary and Gardner, Howard, 1989. Appreciation of indirect requests by left- and right-brain-damaged patients: the effects of verbal context and conventionality of wording. Brain and Language 36: 580–591.

Wichmann, Anne and Blakemore, Diane, eds., 2006. Journal of Pragmatics, Special Issue: Prosody and Pragmatics, 38.

Wierzbicka, Anna, 1987. Boys will be boys: ‘Radical semantics’ vs. ‘radical pragmatics.’Language 63: 95–114.

Wierzbicka, Anna, 1991. Cross-cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Wilkins, David, 1988. Switch-reference in Mparntwe Arrernte (Aranda): form, function, and problems of identity. In Peter Austin, ed., Complex Sentence Constructions in Australian Languages (Typological Studies in Language 15). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 141–176.

Wilson, Deirdre, 1975. Presuppositions and Non-truth-Conditional Semantics. New York: Academic Press.

Wilson, Deirdre, 1995. Is there a maxim of truthfulness?UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 7: 197–212.

Wilson, Deirdre, 2005. New directions for research on pragmatics and modularity. Lingua 115: 1129–1146.

Wilson, Deirdre and Sperber, Dan, 1979. Ordered entailments: an alternative to presuppositional theories. In Oh, Choon-Kyu and Dinneen, David A., eds., Syntax and Semantics, vol. XI: Presupposition. New York: Academic Press, 299–323.

Wilson, Deirdre and Sperber, Dan, 1993. Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua 90: 1–25.

Wilson, Deirdre and Wharton, Tim, 2006. Relevance and prosody. Journal of Pragmatics 38: 1559–1579.

Wu, Shali and Keysar, Boaz, 2007. The effect of culture on perspective taking. Psychological Science 18: 600–606.

Wu, Ying Choon and Coulson, Seana, 2005. Meaningful gestures: electrophysiological indices of iconic gesture comprehension. Psychophysiology 42: 654–667.

Wu, Ying Choon and Coulson, Seana, 2007. How iconic gestures enhance communication: an ERP study. Brain and Language 101: 234–245.

Wunderlich, Dieter, 1980. Methodological remarks on speech act theory. In Searle, John R., Kiefer, Ferenc and Bierwisch, Manfred, eds., Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics (Synthese Language Library 10). Boston: Reidel, 291–312.

Yus Ramos, Francisco, 1998. The ‘what-do-you-mean syndrome’. A taxonomy of misunderstandings in Harold Pinter's plays. Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense 6: 81–100.

Zaidel, Eran, 1985. Language in the right hemisphere. In Benson, D. F. and Zaidel, Eran, eds., The Dual Brain, Hemispheric Specialization in Humans. New York: Guilford Press, 205–231.

Zimmermann, Thomas, 1997. The addressing puzzle. In Künne, Wolfgang, Newen, Albert and Anduschus, Martin, eds., Direct Reference, Indexicality, and Propositional Attitudes (CSLI Lecture Notes 70). Stanford: CSLI Publications, 133–153.

Zipf, George Kingsley, 1949. Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort. Cambridge, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.

Ziv, Yael, 1975. On the relevance of content to the form–function correlation (An examination of extraposed relative clauses). In Grossman, Robin E., San, L. James and Vance, Timothy J., eds., Papers from the Parasession on Functionalism (1st edition). Chicago Linguistic Society, 568–579.

Ziv, Yael, 1982. Getting more mileage out of existentials in English. Linguistics 20: 747–762.

Ziv, Yael, 1994a. Left and right dislocations: discourse functions and anaphora. Journal of Pragmatics 22: 629–645.

Ziv, Yael, 1994b. Not without you I won't: special utterance types in Functional Grammar. In Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth, Jakobsen, Lisbeth Falster and Rasmussen, Lone Schack, eds., Function and Expression in Functional Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 317–329.

Ziv, Yael, 1997. Conditionals and restrictives on generics. In Athanasiadou, Angeliki and Dirven, Réne, eds., On Conditionals Again (Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science IV: Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 143). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 223–239.

Ziv, Yael, 2008. Codifying apparent inconsistencies in discourse: the case of Hebrew ma. In Armon-Lotem, Sharon, Danon, Gabi and Rothstein, Susan, eds., Generative Approaches to Hebrew Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 353–388.

Zribi-Hertz, Anne, 1989. Anaphor binding and narrative point of view: English reflexive pronouns in sentence and discourse. Language 65: 695–727.

Zubin, David and Li, Naicong, 1986. Topic, contrast, definiteness, and word order in Mandarin. In Nikiforidou, Vassiliki, VanClay, Mary, Niepokuj, Mary and Feder, Deborah, eds., Proceedings of the 12th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 292–304.

Zurif, Edgar B., 1980. Language mechanism: a neuropsycholinguistic perspective. American Scientist 68: 305–311.

References

Agha, Asif, 2007. Language and Social Relations. Cambridge University Press.

Aitchison, Jean and Bailey, Guy, 1979. Unhappiness about not unhappy people. Journal of Linguistics 15: 245–266.

Ariel, Mira, 1985. Givenness marking. Ph.D. dissertation, Tel Aviv University.

Ariel, Mira, 1988. Female and male stereotypes in Israeli literature and media: evidence from introductory patterns. Language and Communication 8: 43–68.

Ariel, Mira, 1990. Accessing Noun-phrase Antecedents. London: Routledge.

Ariel, Mira, 2000. The development of person agreement markers: from pronouns to higher accessibility markers. In Michael Barlow and Kemmer, Suzanne, eds., Usage-based Models of Language. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 197–260.

Ariel, Mira, 2004. Most. Language 80: 658–706.

Ariel, Mira, 2008. Pragmatics and Grammar. Cambridge University Press.

Ariel, Mira and Giora, Rachel, 1998. Self versus other point of view in language: redefining femininity and masculinity. International Journal of Sociology of Language 129: 59–86.

Bach, Kent and Harnish, Robert M., 1979. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Bardenstein, Ruti, 2005. The pragmatics of diminutive quantifiers in Modern Hebrew. M.A. Thesis, Linguistics, Tel Aviv University.

Bates, Elizabeth, Thal, Donna, Finlay, Barbara and Clancy, Barbara, 2003. Early language development and its neural correlates. In Rapin, I. and Segalowitz, S., eds., Handbook of Neuropsychology, vol. VIII: Child Neurology (2nd edition). Amsterdam: Elsevier, 109–176.

Bever, Tom G., 1970. The influence of speech performance on linguistic structure. In Levelt, Willem J. M. and Flores d'Arcais, Giovanni B., eds., Advances in Psycholinguistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 21–50.

Blom, Jan-Petter and Gumperz, John J., 1972. Social meaning in linguistic structure: code-switching in Norway. In Gumperz, John J. and Hymes, Dell, eds., Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 407–434.

Brown, Penelope, 1995. Politeness strategies and the attribution of intentions: the case of Tzeltal irony. In Goody, Esther N, ed., Social Intelligence and Interaction. Cambridge University Press, 153–174.

Burton-Roberts, Noel, 1989. The Limits to Debate: A Revised Theory of Semantic Presupposition (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 51). Cambridge University Press.

Bybee, Joan L., Perkins, Revere D. and Pagliuca, William, 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. University of Chicago Press.

Carston, Robyn, 1988. Implicature, explicature and truth-theoretic semantics. In Kempson, Ruth M., ed., Mental Representations: The Interface between Language and Reality. Cambridge University Press, 155–181. (Reprinted in Kasher, ed., vol. 4. 436–464).

Carston, Robyn, 1998. Negation, ‘presupposition’ and the semantics/pragmatics distinction. Journal of Linguistics 34: 309–350.

Carston, Robyn, 1999. Negation, ‘presupposition’ and metarepresentation: a response to Noel Burton-Roberts. Journal of Linguistics 35: 365–389.

Carston, Robyn, 2002. Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.

Chafe, Wallace L. ed., 1980. The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production (Advances in Discourse Processes 3). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Chafe, Wallace L., 1994. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Consciousness Experience in Speaking and Writing. University of Chicago Press.

Chierchia, Gennaro and McConnell-Ginet, Sally, 1990. Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Chomsky, Noam, 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.

Dijk, Teun A. and Petöfi, János, 1977. Foreword. In Grammars and Descriptions. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Drew, Paul, 1992. Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: the case of a trial for rape. In Drew, Paul and Heritage, John, eds., Talk at Work. Cambridge University Press, 470–520.

Du Bois, John W., 1980. Beyond definiteness: the trace of identity in discourse. In Chafe, Wallace L., ed., The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 203–274.

Du Bois, John W., 1985. Competing motivations. In Haiman, John, ed., Iconicity in Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 343–365.

Du Bois, John W., 1987. The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63: 805–855.

Du Bois, John W., Chafe, Wallace L., Meyer, Charles and Thompson, Sandra A., 2000. Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part 1. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.

Dubois, Betty Lou, 1987. ‘Something on the order of around forty to forty-four’: imprecise numerical expressions in biomedical slide talks. Language in Society 16: 527–541.

Frege, Gottlob, 1892. On sense and reference. In Geach, Peter and Black, Max, eds., Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, 1952. Oxford: Blackwell, 56–78.

Gazdar, Gerald, 1979. Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form. New York: Academic Press.

Gernsbacher, Morton Ann, 1990. Language Comprehension as Structure Building. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Gernsbacher, Morton Ann, 1991. Comprehending conceptual anaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes 6: 81–105.

Giora, Rachel, 1985. Notes towards a theory of text coherence. Poetics Today 6: 699–715.

Giora, Rachel and Fein, Ofer, 1999. Irony: context and salience. Metaphor and Symbol 14: 241–257.

Goldberg, Adele E. and Ackerman, Farrell, 2001. The pragmatics of obligatory adjuncts. Language 77: 798–814.

Green, Georgia M., 1990. The universality of Gricean interpretation. In Hall, Kira, Koenig, Jean-Pierre, Meacham, Michael, Reinman, Sondra and Sutton, Laurel A., eds., Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 411–428.

Grice, H. Paul, 1981. Presupposition and conversational implicature. In Cole, Peter, ed., Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 183–198.

Grice, H. Paul, 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Gumperz, John J., 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge University Press.

Gumperz, John J., 1996. The linguistic and cultural relativity of conversational inference. In Gumperz, John J. and Levinson, Stephen C., eds., Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge University Press, 374–406.

Hall, Kira and O'Donovan, Veronica, 1996. Shifting gender positions among Hindi-speaking hijras. In Bergvall, Victoria L., Bing, Janet M. and Freed, Alice F., eds., Rethinking Language and Gender Research: Theory and Practice. London: Longman, 228–266.

Hamblin, Jennifer L. and Raymond W. Jr. Gibbs, 2003. Processing the meanings of what speakers say and implicate. Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal 35: 59–80.

Harnish, Robert M., 1976. Logical form and implicature. In Bever, Tom G., Katz, Jerrold J. and Langendoen, D. Terence, eds., An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Ability. New York: Crowell, 313–391

Hopper, Paul J. and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, 1993/2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.

Horn, Laurence R., 1984. A new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicatures. In Schiffrin, Deborah, ed., Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications (Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 11–42.

Horn, Laurence R., 1989. A Natural History of Negation. University of Chicago Press.

Horn, Laurence R., 1991. Given as new: when redundant information isn't. Journal of Pragmatics 15: 313–336.

Horn, Laurence R., 1996. Presupposition and implicature. In Lappin, Shalom, ed., The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 299–319.

Horn, Laurence R., 2004. Implicature. In Horn, Laurence R. and Ward, Gregory L., eds., Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell, 3–28.

Irvine, Judith T., 1990. Registering affect: heteroglossia in the linguistic expression of emotion. In Lutz, Catherine A. and Abu-Lughod, Lila, eds., Language and the Politics of Emotion. Cambridge University Press, 126–161.

Irvine, Judith T., 1993. Insult and responsibility: verbal abuse in a Wolof village. In Hill, Jane H. and Irvine, Judith T., eds., Responsibility and Evidence in Oral Discourse. Cambridge University Press, 105–134.

Israel, Michael, 2002. Literally speaking. Journal of Pragmatics: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language Studies 34: 423–432.

Jurafsky, Daniel, Bell, Alan and Girand, Cynthia, 2002. The role of the lemma in form variation. In Gussenhoven, Carlos and Warner, Natasha, eds., Laboratory Phonology VII. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 3–34.

Kadmon, Nirit, 2001. Formal Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell.

Karttunen, Lauri, 1973. Presuppositions of compound sentences. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 169–193.

Karttunen, Lauri, 1974. Presuppositions and linguistic context. Theoretical Linguistics 1: 3–44.

Kasher, Asa, 1976. Conversational maxims and rationality. In Kasher, Asa, ed., Language in Focus: Foundations, Methods and Systems. Dordrecht: Reidel, 197–216.

Kasher, Asa, 1982. Gricean inference revisited. Philosophica 29: 25–44.

Kasher, Asa, 1994. Rationality and pragmatics. In Asher, R. E. and Simpson, J. M. Y., eds., The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, vol. VI. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 3280–3282.

Keenan, Edward L., 1971. Two kinds of presupposition in natural language. In Fillmore, Charles J. and Langendoen, D. Terence, eds., Studies in Linguistic Semantics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 45–52.

Kempson, Ruth M., 1975. Presupposition and the Delimitation of Semantics (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 15). Cambridge University Press.

Kempson, Ruth M., 1988a. Grammar and conversational principles. In Newmeyer, Frederick J. and Robins, R. H., eds., Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, vol. II: Linguistic Theory: Extensions and Implications. Cambridge University Press, 139–163.

Kempson, Ruth M., ed. 1988b. Mental Representations: The Interface between Language and Reality. Cambridge University Press.

Koktová, E., 1998. Implicature, conversational. In Mey, Jacob L., ed., Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 371–373.

Kuno, Susumu, 1976. Subject, theme, and the speaker's empathy: a reexamination of relativization phenomena. In Li, Charles N., ed., Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press, 417–444.

Kuno, Susumu, 1987. Functional Syntax: Anaphora, Discourse, and Empathy. Chicago University Press.

Lasersohn, Peter, 1999. Pragmatic halos. Language 75: 522–551.

Lenk, Uta, 1998. Marking Discourse Coherence. Tübingen: Ginter Narr Verlag.

Levinson, Stephen C., 1979a. Activity types and language. Linguistics 17: 365–399.

Levinson, Stephen C., 1979b. Pragmatics and social deixis: reclaiming the notion of conventional implicature. Paper presented at Berkeley Linguistics Society.

Levinson, Stephen C., 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.

Levinson, Stephen C., 2000. Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Lewis, David K., 1979. Scorekeeping in a language game. In Bäuerle, Rainer, Egli, Urs and Stechow, Arnim, eds., Semantics from Different Points of View (Springer Series in Language and Communication 6). New York: Springer-Verlag, 172–187.

Liberman, Mark, 1973. Alternatives. In Chicago Linguistic Society 9. Chicago Linguistic Society, 346–355.

Maschler, Yael, 1994. Metalanguaging and discourse markers in bilingual conversation. Language in Society 23: 325–366.

Maschler, Yael, 1997. Emergent bilingual grammar: the case of contrast. Journal of Pragmatics 28: 279–313.

Mateo, José and Ramos, Francisco Yus, 2000. Insults: a relevance-theoretic taxonomical approach to their translation. International Journal of Translation 12: 97–130.

Matisoff, James A., 2007. Syntactic parallelism and morphological elaboration in Lahu religious poetry. Paper presented at Linguistics Department colloquium, UC Santa Barbara, 2.1.2007.

McCloskey, James, and Kenneth Hale, 1984. On the syntax of person-number inflection in Modern Irish. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 1: 487–533.

Minning, Heidi, 2004. Qwir-English code-mixing in Germany: constructing a rainbow of identities. In Leap, William and Boellstorff, Tom, eds., Speaking in Queer Tongues: Globalization and Gay Language. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 46–71.

Munro, Pamela, 2007. A definite mystery. Paper presented at BLS, Berkeley.

Newmeyer, Frederick J., 1983. Grammatical Theory. University of Chicago Press.

Ochs, Elinor, 1992. Indexing gender. In Duranti, Alessandro and Goodwin, Charles, eds., Rethinking Context. Cambridge University Press, 336–358.

Ochs Keenan, Elinor, 1976. On the universality of conversational implicatures. Language in Society 5: 67–80.

Oh, Choon-Kyu and Dinneen, David A., eds., 1979. Syntax and Semantics, vol. XI: Presupposition. New York: Academic Press.

Overstreet, Maryann, 1999. Whales, Candlelight, and Stuff Like That: General Extenders in English Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.

Prince, Ellen F., 1978. On the function of existential presupposition in discourse. In Chicago Linguistic Society 14. Chicago Linguistic Society, 362–376.

Reid, Wallis, 1991. Verb and Noun Number in English: A Functional Explanation (Longman Linguistics Library). London: Longman.

Reinhart, Tanya, 1981. Pragmatics and linguistics: an analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica 27: 53–94.

Robinson, Edward A., 1997. The cognitive foundations of pragmatic principles: implications for theories of linguistic and cognitive representation. In Nuyts, Jan and Pederson, Eric, eds., Language and Conceptualization (Language, Culture and Cognition 1). Cambridge University Press, 253–271.

Romaine, Suzanne, 1999. Communicating Gender. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Russell, Bertrand, 1905. On denoting. Mind 14: 479–493.

Sadock, Jerrold M., 1978. On testing for conversational implicature. In Cole, Peter, ed., Syntax and Semantics, vol. IX: Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 281–297. (Reprinted in Kasher, ed. 1998, vol. IV, 315–31. Citations are made to Sadock 1998).

Schiffrin, Deborah, 1988. Conversation analysis. In Newmeyer, Frederick J. and Robins, R. H., eds., Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, vol. IV: Language: The Socio-cultural Context. Cambridge University Press, 251–276.

Segal, G., 1996. The modularity of theory of mind. In Carruthers, Peter and Smith, Peter K., eds., Theories of Theories of Mind. Cambridge University Press.

Simons, Mandy, 2005. Presupposition and relevance. In Szabó, Zoltán Gendler, ed., Semantics vs. Pragmatics. Oxford University Press, 329–355.

Sinclair, Melinda, 1995. Fitting pragmatics into the mind: some issues in mentalist pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics 23: 509–539.

Solan, Lawrence M. and Tiersma, Peter M., 2005. Speaking of Crime: The Language of Criminal Justice (Chicago Series in Law and Society). University of Chicago Press.

Sperber, Dan and Wilson, Deirdre, 1986/1995. Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.

Stalnaker, Robert C., 1972. Pragmatics. In Davidson, Donald and Harman, Gilbert, eds., Semantics of Natural Language. Dordrecht: Reidel, 380–397.

Stampe, Dennis W., 1981. Pragmatics and causal theoretic aspects of semantics. In Parret, Herman, Sbisà, Marina and Verschueren, Jef, eds., Possibilities and Limitations of Pragmatics (Studies in Language Companion Series 7). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 683–712.

Straehle, Carolyn A., 1993. “Samuel?” “Yes, dear?”: teasing and conversational rapport. In Tannen, Deborah, ed., Framing in Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press, 210–230.

Strawson, Peter F., 1950. On referring. Mind 59: 320–344.

Strawson, Peter F., 1964/1974. Identifying reference and truth-values. In Zabeeh, Farhang, Klemke, E. D. and Jacobson, Arthur, eds., Readings in Semantics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 194–216.

Thompson, Sandra A. and Mulac, Anthony, 1991. The discourse conditions for the use of the complementizer that in conversational English. Journal of Pragmatics 15: 237–251.

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, 2004. A critique of Levinson's view of Q- and M-inferences in historical pragmatics. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 5: 1–25.

Verhagen, Arie, 2005. Constructions of Intersubjectivity. Oxford University Press.

Wierzbicka, Anna, 1991. Cross-cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Wilson, Deirdre, 2005. New directions for research on pragmatics and modularity. Lingua 115: 1129–1146.

Wilson, Deirdre and Sperber, Dan, 2002. Truthfulness and relevance. Mind 111: 583–632.

Zaidel, Eran, Soroker, Nachum, Kasher, Asa, Giora, Rachel, Batori, Gila, Gil, Mali and Korn, Cecilia, 2001. Processing of basic speech acts following localized brain damage: a new light on the neuroanatomy of language. Unpublished ms.

Ziv, Yael, 1994a. Not without you I won't: special utterance types in Functional Grammar. In Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth, Jakobsen, Lisbeth Falster and Rasmussen, Lone Schack, eds., Function and Expression in Functional Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 317–329.

Ziv, Yael, 1994b. Left and right dislocations: discourse functions and anaphora. Journal of Pragmatics 22: 629–645.

Zuckermann, Ghil'ad, 2006. Direct and indirect speech in straight-talking Israeli. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 53: 467–481.

Defining Pragmatics

This Book has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

Book description

Reviews

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Contents

Frontmatter
pp i-viii

Contents
pp ix-xii

Preface
pp xiii-xiv

Acknowledgments
pp xv-xvi

Transcription conventions
pp xvii-xviii

1 - What's under the big-tent pragmatics?
pp 1-20

Part I - Deconstructing pragmatics
pp 21-22

2 - Surveying multiple-criterion definitions for pragmatics
pp 23-55

3 - Problematizing the criteria
pp 56-90

Part II - Reconstituting pragmatics
pp 91-92

4 - Grammar as code, pragmatics as inference
pp 93-119

5 - Inferential pragmatic theories
pp 120-144

Part III - Mapping the big tent
pp 145-148

6 - The canon
pp 149-168

7 - Functional syntax
pp 169-211

8 - Beyond pragmatics
pp 212-229

9 - Many questions, some resolutions
pp 230-274

Notes
pp 275-292

References
pp 293-322

Index of names
pp 323-328

Index of subjects
pp 329-330

Metrics

Full text views

Book summary page views

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

Accessibility Information

Defining Pragmatics

Book description

Reviews

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Save Search

Contents

Metrics

Full text views

Book summary page views

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

Accessibility Information