References
Abels, K. (2003). Successive cyclicity, anti-locality, and adposition stranding. Ph.D. thesis, University of Connecticut.
Abels, K. and Bentzen, K. (2009). Are movement paths punctuated or uniform? Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 8, 19–40.
Abney, S. P. (1987). The noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Ph.D. thesis, MIT.
Aboh, E. O. (2009). Clause structure and verb series. Linguistic Inquiry, 40(1), 1–33.
Acedo-Matellán, V. (2010). Argument structure and the syntax–morphology interface. A case study in Latin and other languages. Ph.D. thesis, Universitat de Barcelona.
Acquaviva, P. and Panagiotidis, P. (2012). Lexical decomposition meets conceptual atomism. MS, University College Dublin and University of Cyprus.
Adger, D. (2003). Core Syntax: A Minimalist Approach. Oxford University Press.
Adger, D. (2010). A minimalist theory of feature structure. In Features: Perspectives on a Key Notion in Linguistics (ed. Kibort, A. and Corbett, G.), pp. 185–218. Oxford University Press.
Adger, D. (2013a). Constructions and grammatical explanation: Comments on Goldberg. Mind & Language, 28, 466–478.
Adger, D. (2013b). The Syntax of Substance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Adger, D., Harbour, D., and Watkins, L. J. (2009). Mirrors and Macroparameters: Phrase Structure beyond Free Word Order. Cambridge University Press.
Adger, D. and Svenonius, P. (2011). Features in minimalist syntax. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism (ed. Boeckx, C.), pp. 27–51. Oxford University Press.
Amritavalli, R. and Jayaseelan, K. A. (2003). The genesis of syntactic categories and parametric variation. In Generative Grammar in a Broader Perspective: Proceedings of the 4th GLOW in Asia, pp. 19–41.
Anderson, S. R. (2004). Doctor Dolittle’s Delusion: Animals and the Uniqueness of Human Language. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Arad, M. (2005). Roots and Patterns: Hebrew Morpho-Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Arbib, M. (n.d.). Neurolinguistics. MS, University of Southern California.
Arregi, K. and Nevins, A. (2012). Morphotactics: Basque Auxiliaries and the Structure of Spellout. Dordrecht: Springer.
Arregi, K. and Nevins, A. (2013). Contextual neutralization and the elsewhere principle. In Morphemes for Morris Halle (ed. Marantz, A. and Matushansky, O.), pp. 199–222. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Arsenijević, B. (2009). Clausal complementation as relativization. Lingua, 119(1), 39–50.
Arsenijević, B. (2013). The syntactic triangle: phases, categories and reference. MS, University of Niš.
Arsenijević, B. and Hinzen, W. (2010). Recursion as a human universal and as a primitive. Biolinguistics, 4, 165–173.
Arsenijević, B. and Hinzen, W. (2012). On the absence of x-within-x recursion in human grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 43(3), 423–440.
Bach, E. and Horn, G. M. (1976). Remarks on “conditions on transformations.” Linguistic Inquiry, 7(2), 265–299.
Bak, P. (1996). How Nature Works: The Science of Self-organized Criticality. New York: Copernicus.
Bak, P., Tang, C., andWiesenfeld, K. (1988). Self-organized criticality. Physical Review A, 38(1), 364–374.
Baker, M. (1988). Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. University of Chicago Press.
Baker, M. (1996). The Polysynthesis Parameter. Oxford University Press.
Baker, M. (1999). On the interplay of the universal and the particular: Case study of Edo. In Proceedings of CLS 35: The Panels, pp. 265–289. Chicago Linguistic Society.
Baker, M. (2001). The Atoms of Language. New York: Basic Books.
Baker, M. (2003). Lexical Categories: Verbs, Nouns, and Adjectives. Cambridge University Press.
Baker, M. (2005). The innate endowment for language: Underspecified or overspecified? In The Innate Mind (ed. Carruthers, P., Laurence, S., and Stich, S.), pp. 156–174. Oxford University Press.
Baker, M. (2008a). The macroparameter in a microparametric world. In The Limits of Variation (ed. Biberauer, T.), pp. 351–373. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Baker, M. (2008b). The Syntax of Agreement and Concord. Cambridge University Press.
Baker, M. (2011). Principles and parameters set out from Europe. Presented at 50 Years of Linguistics at MIT.
Baker, M. and Collins, C. (2006). Linkers and the internal structure of vP. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 24(2), 307–354.
Baker, M. and Vinokurova, N. (2010). Two modalities of case assignment in Sakha. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 28, 593–642.
Balari, S., Boeckx, C., and Lorenzo, G. (2012). On the feasibility of biolinguistics: Koster’s word-based challenge and our ‘natural computation’ alternative. Biolinguistics, 6(2), 205–221.
Balari, S. and Lorenzo, G. (2013). Computational Phenotypes: Towards an Evolutionary Developmental Biolinguistics. Oxford University Press.
Ball, P. (2006). Critical Mass: How One Thing Leads to Another. New York: Farrar Straus & Giroux.
Barner, D., Wood, J., Hauser, M., and Carey, S. (2008). Evidence for a non-linguistic distinction between singular and plural sets in rhesus monkeys. Cognition, 107(2), 603–622.
Behar, D. M., Villems, R., Soodyall, H., Blue-Smith, J., Pereira, L., Metspalu, E., Scozzari, R., Makkan, H., Tzur, S., Comas, D. et al. (2008). The dawn of human matrilineal diversity. American Journal of Human Genetics, 82(5), 1130–1140.
Béjar, S. (2003). Phi-syntax: A theory of agreement. Ph.D. thesis, University of Toronto.
Belletti, A. (2004). Aspects of the low IP area. In The Structure of CP and IP (ed. Rizzi, L.), pp. 16–51. Oxford University Press.
Benítez-Burraco, A. (2009). Genes y lenguaje. Aspectos ontogenéticos, filogenéticos y cognitivos. Reverté, Barcelona.
Benítez-Burraco, A. and Longa, V. (2010). Evo-Devo – of course, but which one? Biolinguistics, 4, 308–323.
Berwick, R. C. (2011). All you need is merge: biology, computation and language from the bottom-up. In The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty (ed. Di Sciullo, A. M. and Boeckx, C.), pp. 461–491. Oxford University Press.
Berwick, R., Beckers, G., Okanoya, K., and Bolhuis, J. (2012). A bird’s eye view of human language evolution. Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience, 4(5).
Berwick, R. C. and Chomsky, N. (2011). The biolinguistic program: The current state of its development. In The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty (ed. Di Sciullo, A. M. and Boeckx, C.), pp. 19–41. Oxford University Press.
Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In Cognition and the Development of Language (ed. Hayes, J. R.), pp. 279–362. New York: Wiley.
Bhatt, R. and Walkow, M. (2013). Locating agreement in grammar: An argument from agreement in conjunctions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 31(4), 951–1013.
Biberauer, T. (ed.) (2008). The Limits of Syntactic Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Biberauer, T. (ed.) (n.d). Disharmonic word order, quirky morphology and the Afrikaans verb cluster. MS, University of Cambridge.
Biberauer, T., Holmberg, A., and Roberts, I. G. (2007). Structure and linearization in disharmonic word orders. Paper presented at the 17th Colloquium of Generative Grammar, Girona.
Biberauer, T. and Richards, M. (2006). True optionality: When the grammar doesn’t mind. In Minimalist Essays (ed. Boeckx, C.), pp. 35–67. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Blevins, J. (2004). Evolutionary Phonology: The Emergence of Sound Patterns. Cambridge University Press.
Bobaljik, J. D. (2008). Where’s Phi? Agreement as a post-syntactic operation. In Phi Theory: Phi-Features across Modules and Interfaces (ed. Harbour, D., Adger, D., and Béjar, S.), pp. 295–328. Oxford University Press.
Bobaljik, J. D. and Thráinsson, H. (1998). Two heads aren’t always better than one. Syntax, 1, 37–71.
Boeckx, C. (2003). Islands and Chains. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Boeckx, C. (2005). Generative grammar and modern cognitive science. Journal of Cognitive Science, 6, 45–54.
Boeckx, C. (2006). Linguistic Minimalism: Origins, Concepts, Methods, and Aims. Oxford University Press.
Boeckx, C. (2008a). Aspects of the Syntax of Agreement. London: Routledge.
Boeckx, C. (2008b). Bare Syntax. Oxford University Press.
Boeckx, C. (2008c). The person case constraint and patterns of exclusivity. In Agreement Restrictions (ed. D’Alessandro, R., Fischer, S., and Hrafnbjargarson, G.), pp. 87–101. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Boeckx, C. (2008d). Understanding Minimalist Syntax: Lessons from Locality in Long-distance Dependencies. Oxford: Blackwell.
Boeckx, C. (2009a). Cartesian biolinguistics. SOLIFIC lecture, Sophia University, July 2009. MS, ICREA – Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Boeckx, C. (2009b). Language in Cognition: Uncovering Mental Structures and the Rules behind Them. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Boeckx, C. (2009c). The locus of asymmetry in UG. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 8, 41–53.
Boeckx, C. (2009d). On long-distance agree. Iberia, 1, 1–32.
Boeckx, C. (2009e). On the nature of merge. In Of Minds and Language: A Basque Encounter with Noam Chomsky (ed. Piattelli-Palmarini, M., Salaburu, P., and Uriagereka, J.), pp. 44–57. Oxford University Press.
Boeckx, C. (2009f). Some notes on the syntax–thought interface. In Proceedings of the Sophia University Linguistic Society 24, pp. 92–103. Sophia University Linguistic Society.
Boeckx, C. (2010a). Linguistic minimalism. In Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis (ed. Heine, B. and Narrog, H.), pp. 485–505. Oxford University Press.
Boeckx, C. (2010b). Syntactic order for free. Presented at the 10th European Conference on Complex Systems, Lisbon University Institute, workshop “Modelling the non-separability of a very complex world.”
Boeckx, C. (2011a). Approaching parameters from below. In The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty (ed. Sciullo, A.-M. D. and Boeckx, C.), pp. 205–221. Oxford University Press.
Boeckx, C. (2011b). The emergence of the language faculty, from a biolinguistic point of view. In The Oxford Handbook of Language Evolution (ed. Tallerman, M. and Gibson, K.), pp. 492–501. Oxford University Press.
Boeckx, C. (2011c). Some reflections on Darwin’s problem in the context of Cartesian biolinguistics. In The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty (ed. Di Sciullo, A.-M. and Boeckx, C.), pp. 42–64. Oxford University Press.
Boeckx, C. (2012a). Phases beyond explanatory adequacy. In Phase Theory: Developing the Framework (ed. Gallego, A.), pp. 45–66. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Boeckx, C. (2012b). Syntactic Islands. Cambridge University Press.
Boeckx, C. (2013a). Biolinguistics: Facts, fiction, forecast. Biolinguistics, 7, 316–328.
Boeckx, C. (2013b). Biolinguistics: Forays into human cognitive biology. Journal of Anthropological Sciences, 91, 63–89.
Boeckx, C. (2013c). Merge: Biolinguistic considerations. English Linguistics, 30(2), 463–483.
Boeckx, C. (2014a). The roots of current biolinguistic thought: Revisiting the “Chomsky–Piaget debate” in the context of the revival of biolinguistics. Teorema, 33, 83–94.
Boeckx, C. (2014b). What can an extended synthesis do for biolinguistics? On the needs and benefits of eco-evo-devo program. In The Evolution of Communication in Primates: A Multidisciplinary Approach (ed. Gontier, N. and Pina, M.), pp. 313–326. Dordrecht: Springer.
Boeckx, C. (2014c). What Principles & Parameters got wrong. In Linguistic Variation and the Minimalist Program (ed. Picallo, C.). Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Boeckx, C. (forthcoming). Considerations pertaining to the nature of logodiversity, or how to construct a parametric space without parameters. In Rethinking Parameters (ed. Eguren, Luis et al.). Oxford University Press.
Boeckx, C. and Benítez-Burraco, A. (2014). The shape of the language-ready brain. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 282.
Boeckx, C. and Grohmann, K. K. (2007). Putting phases in perspective. Syntax, 10, 204–222.
Boeckx, C. and Hornstein, N. (2008). Superiority, reconstruction and islands. In Foundational Issues in Linguistics (ed. Otero, C., Freidin, R., and Zubizarreta, M.-L.), pp. 197–225. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Boeckx, C., Hornstein, N., and Nunes, J. (2010). Control as Movement. Cambridge University Press.
Boeckx, C. and Leivada, E. (2013). Entangled parametric hierarchies: Problems for an overspecified universal grammar. PLoS One, 8(9), e72357.
Boeckx, C. and Leivada, E. (2014). On the particulars of universal grammar: Implications for acquisition. Language Sciences [in press], ICREA & Universitat de Barcelona.
Boeckx, C. and Martín, T. (2013). El clitic datiu es mes que un clitic. Pages editors, Lleida.
Boeckx, C. and Martínez-Álvarez, A. (2013). A multi-step algorithm for serial order: Converging evidence from linguistics and neuroscience. Presented at GLOW 36, Lund.
Boeckx, C., Martins, P. T., and Leivada, E. (in press). Biolinguistics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Syntactic Change (ed. Roberts, I. and Ledgeway, A.). Cambridge University Press.
Boeckx, C. and Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (2005). Language as a natural object; linguistics as a natural science. Linguistic Review, 22(2–4), 467–471.
Boeckx, C. and Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (2007). Linguistics in cognitive science: state of the art amended. Linguistic Review, 24(4), 403–415.
Boeckx, C. and Samuels, B. (2009). What emerges from merge in phonology. Presented at the 6th Old World Conference on Phonology, Edinburgh, UK.
Boeckx, C. and Uriagereka, J. (2007). Minimalism. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces (ed. Ramchand, G. and Reiss, C.), pp. 541–573. Oxford University Press.
Borer, H. (1984). Parametric Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.
Borer, H. (2003). Exo-skeletal vs. endo-skeletal explanations: Syntactic projections and the lexicon. In The Nature of Explanation (ed. Moore, J. and Polinsky, M.), pp. 31–67. Chicago: CSLI Publications.
Borer, H. (2005). Structuring Sense (2 vols.). Oxford University Press.
Bošković, Ž. (1994). D-structure, theta criterion, and movement into theta positions. Linguistic Analysis, 24, 247–286.
Bošković, Ž. (2002). A-movement and the EPP. Syntax, 5, 167–218.
Bošković, Ž. (2005). On the locality of left branch extraction and the structure of NP. Studia Linguistica, 59(1), 1–45.
Bošković, Ž. (2007). On the locality and motivation of move and agree: An even more minimal theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 38(4), 589–644.
Bošković, Ž. (2008a). The NP/DP analysis and Slovenian. In Novi Sad Generative Syntax Workshop, pp. 53–73. University of Novi Sad.
Bošković, Ž. (2008b). What will you have, DP or NP? In Proceedings of NELS 37. GLSA.
Bošković, Ž. (2010). NPs and clauses. MS, University of Connecticut.
Bošković, Ž. (2011). On valued uninterpretable features. In Proceedings of NELS 39, pp. 109–120. GLSA Publications: University of Massachusetts.
Bošković, Ž. and Lasnik, H. (2007). Minimalist Syntax: The Essential Readings. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Brame, M.K. (1976). Conjectures and Refutations in Syntax and Semantics. London: North Holland.
Briscoe, E. and Feldman, J. (2006). Conceptual complexity and the bias–variance tradeoff. MS, Rutgers University.
Brody, M. (2000). Mirror theory: Syntactic representation in perfect syntax. Linguistic Inquiry, 29, 367–398.
Brody, M. (2003). Towards an Elegant Syntax. New York: Routledge.
Browning, M. (1987). Null operator constructions. Ph.D. thesis, MIT.
Bruening, B. (2008). Selectional asymmetries between CP and DP suggest that the DP hypothesis is wrong. MS, University of Delaware.
Bufill, E. and Carbonell, E. (2004). Are symbolic behaviour and neuroplasticity an example of gene–culture coevolution? Revista de neurologia, 39(1), 48–55.
Butler, J. (2004). Phase structure, phrase structure, and quantification. Ph.D. thesis, University of York.
Bybee, J. (2010). Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge University Press.
Bye, P. and Svenonius, P. (2012). Non-concatenative morphology as epiphenomenon. In The Morphology and Phonology of Exponence (ed. Trommer, J.), pp. 427–495. Oxford University Press.
Caha, P. (2009). The nanosyntax of case. Ph.D. thesis, Universitetet i Troms𝜙.
Caponigro, I. and Polinsky, M. (2011). Relative embeddings: A Circassian puzzle for the syntax/semantics interface. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 29, 71–122.
Caponigro, I. and Polinsky, M. (forthcoming). Almost everything is relative in the Caucasus. In Proceedings of SALT 18.
Carnie, A. (2008). Constituent Structure. Oxford University Press.
Carruthers, P. (2006). The Architecture of the Mind. Oxford University Press.
Carstens, V. (2005). Agree and EPP in Bantu. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 23(2), 219–279.
Castañeda, H.-N. (1967). Actions, imperatives, and obligations. In Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 68, pp. 25–48.
Cheney, D. L. and Seyfarth, R. M. (1990). How Monkeys See the World. University of Chicago Press.
Cheney, D. L. and Seyfarth, R. M. (2007). Baboon Metaphysics: The Evolution of a Social Mind. University of Chicago Press.
Cheng, L. L. S. and Sybesma, R. (1999). Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry, 30(4), 509–542.
Cheng, L. L. S. and Sybesma, R. (2005). Classifiers in four varieties of Chinese. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax (ed. Cinque, G. and Kayne, R.), pp. 259–292. Oxford University Press.
Chierchia, G. (1998). Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics, 6, 339–405.
Chomsky, N. (1955). The logical structure of linguistic theory. MS, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. [published in part in 1975. New York: Plenum]
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (1966). Cartesian Linguistics. New York: Harper & Row. [third edition, with introduction by J. McGilvray, 2009, Cambridge University Press].
Chomsky, N. (1970). Remarks on nominalization. In Readings in English Transformational Grammar (ed. Jacobs, R. and Rosenbaum, P.), pp. 184–221. Waltham, MA: Ginn.
Chomsky, N. (1972). Language and Mind. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Chomsky, N. (1973). Conditions on transformations. In A Festschrift for Morris Halle (ed. Anderson, S. and Kiparsky, P.), pp. 232–286. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Chomsky, N. (1977a). Essays on Form and Interpretation. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Chomsky, N. (1977b). On wh-movement. In Formal Syntax (ed. Culicover, P., Wasow, T., and Akmajian, A.), pp. 71–132. New York: Academic Press.
Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and Representations. New York: Columbia University Press.
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of Language. New York: Praeger.
Chomsky, N. (1988). Language and Problems of Knowledge: The Managua Lectures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (1993). A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In The View from Building 20 (ed. Hale, K. and Keyser, S. J.), pp. 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (1994). Bare phrase structure. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 5. Reprinted in G. Webelhuth, ed. (1995), Government and Binding Theory and the Minimalist Program, 383–439. Oxford: Blackwell.
Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (2000a). Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik (ed. Martin, R., Michaels, D., and Uriagereka, J.), pp. 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (2000b). New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge University Press.
Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language (ed. Kenstowicz, M.), pp. 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (2004). Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Structures and Beyond (ed. Belletti, A.), pp. 104–131. New York: Oxford University Press.
Chomsky, N. (2005). Three factors in the language design. Linguistic Inquiry, 36, 1–22.
Chomsky, N. (2007). Approaching UG from below. In Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Chomsky’s Minimalism and the View from Semantics (ed. Sauerland, U. and Gärtner, H.-M.), pp. 1–30. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Chomsky, N. (2008). On phases. In Foundational Issues in Linguistics (ed. Otero, C., Freidin, R., and Zubizarreta, M.-L.), pp. 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (2012a). Foreword. In Phases: Developing the Framework (ed. Gallego, Á.), pp. 1–7. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Chomsky, N. (2012b). The Science of Language: Interviews with James McGilvray. Cambridge University Press.
Chomsky, N. (2013). Problems of projection. Lingua, 130, 33–49.
Chomsky, N. and Halle, M. (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. Harper & Row, New York. Reprinted in 1991. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N., Halle, M., and Lukoff, F. (1956). On accent and juncture in English. In For Roman Jakobson: Essays on the Occasion of His Sixtieth Birthday, pp. 65–80. The Hague: Mouton.
Chomsky, N. and Lasnik, H. (1977). Filters and Control. Linguistic Inquiry, 8(3), 425–504.
Chung, S. (2012). On reaching agreement late. In Proceedings of CLS 48.
Cinque, G. (1999). Adverbs and Functional Heads. Oxford University Press.
Cinque, G. (2002). “We had to meet in cafés to read Syntactic Structures.” Glot International, 6, 190–193.
Cinque, G. (2013). Typological Studies. Word Order and Relative Clauses. New York: Routledge.
Cinque, G. and Rizzi, L. (2010). The cartography of syntactic structures. In Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis (ed. Heine, B. and Narrog, H.), pp. 51–65. Oxford University Press.
Collins, C. (2002). Eliminating labels. In Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program (ed. Epstein, S. D. and Seely, T. D.), pp. 42–64. Oxford: Blackwell.
Collins, C. (2005). A smuggling approach to the passive in English. Syntax, 8(2), 81–120.
Collins, C. and Ura, H. (2001). Eliminating phrase structure. MS, Cornell University and Kwansei Gakuin University.
Cooke, J. and Zeeman, E. C. (1976). A clock and wavefront model for control of the number of repeated structures during animal morphogenesis. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 58(2), 455–476.
Cottingham, J. (1978). ‘A brute to the brutes?’: Descartes’ treatment of animals. Philosophy, 53(206), 551–559.
Cuervo, M. C. (2003). Datives at large. Ph.D. thesis, MIT.
Culbertson, J. (2010). Learning biases, regularization, and the emergence of typological universals in syntax. Ph.D. thesis, Johns Hopkins University.
Culicover, P. (1999). Syntactic Nuts: Hard Cases, Syntactic Theory, and Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press.
Culicover, P. W. and Jackendoff, R. (2005). Simpler Syntax. Oxford University Press.
Davidson, D. (1967). The logical form of action sentences. In Essays on Actions and Events (ed. Davidson, D.), pp. 105–148. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Dawkins, R. (1996). The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe Without Design. New York: Norton.
Dawkins, R. (2006). The God Delusion. London: Black Swan.
De Belder, M. and van Craenenbroeck, J. (2011). How to merge a root. MS, Brussels and Utrecht.
De Belder, M. and van Craenenbroeck, J. (2013). On vocabulary insertion. MS, HU Brussels.
De Vries, M. (2009). On multidominance and linearization. Biolinguistics, 3(4), 344–403.
Deacon, T.W. (2006). Emergence: The hole at the wheel’s hub. In The Re-emergence of Emergence: The Emergentist Hypothesis from Science to Religion (ed. Clayton, P. and Davies, P.), pp. 111–150. Oxford University Press.
Deacon, T.W. (2010). A role for relaxed selection in the evolution of the language capacity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(Supplement 2), 9000–9006.
Dediu, D. and Levinson, S. C. (2013). On the antiquity of language: The reinterpretation of neandertal linguistic capacities and its consequences. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 397.
Dehaene, S. (1997). The Number Sense. Oxford University Press.
Demirdache, H. and Uribe-Etxebarria, M. (2000). The primitives of temporal relations. In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik (ed. Martin, R., Michaels, D., and Uriagereka, J.), pp. 157–186. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Di Sciullo, A.M. and Boeckx, C. (2011). Contours of the biolinguistic research agenda. In The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty (ed. Sciullo, A.-M. D. and Boeckx, C.), pp. 1–16. Oxford University Press.
Diamond, J. M. (1992). The Third Chimpanzee: The Evolution and Future of the Human Animal. New York: HarperCollins.
Diercks, M. (2011). Parameterizing case: Evidence from Bantu. MS, Pomona College.
Dillon, B. and Idsardi, W. (2009). Investigating statistical approaches to building a phonology. MS, University of Maryland.
Dowty, D. (1989). On the semantic content of the notion of “thematic role.” In Properties, Types and Meaning (ed. Chierchia, G., Partee, B. H., and Turner, R.), pp. 69–129. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Drummond, A. (2011). Binding phenomena within a reductionist theory of grammatical dependencies. Ph.D. thesis, University of Maryland.
Duguine, M. (2013). Null arguments and linguistic variation: A minimalist analysis of pro-drop. Ph.D. thesis, Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea and Université de Nantes.
Dupuy, J.-P. (2009). On the Origins of Cognitive Science: The Mechanization of the Mind (2nd edn). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Embick, D. (2010). Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Embick, D. and Noyer, R. (2007). Distributed morphology and the syntax/morphology interface. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces (ed. Ramchand, G. and Reiss, C.), pp. 289–324. Oxford University Press.
Emonds, J. E. (1985). A Unified Theory of Syntactic Categories. Dordrecht: Foris.
Emonds, J. E. (2008). Valuing v-features and n-features: What adjuncts tell us about case, agreement, and syntax in general. In Merging Features: Computation, Interpretation, and Acquisition (ed. Brucart, J., Gavarró, A., and Solà, J.), pp. 194–214. Oxford University Press.
Endress, A. D., Cahill, D., Block, S., Watumull, J., and Hauser, M. D. (2009). Evidence of an evolutionary precursor to human language affixation in a non-human primate. Biology Letters, 5(6), 749–751.
Endress, A. D., Carden, S., Versace, E., and Hauser, M. D. (2010). The apes’ edge: Positional learning in chimpanzees and humans. Animal Cognition, 13(3), 483–495.
Endress, A. D., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., and Mehler, J. (2007). Perceptual constraints and the learnability of simple grammars. Cognition, 105(3), 577–614.
Endress, A. D. and Mehler, J. (2009). Primitive computations in speech processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(11), 2187–2209.
Endress, A. D., Nespor, M., and Mehler, J. (2009). Perceptual and memory constraints on language acquisition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(8), 348–353.
Epstein, S. D. (2003 [2007]). On i(nternalist)–functional explanation in minimalism. Linguistic Analysis, 33(1–2), 20–53.
Epstein, S. D., Kitahara, H., and Seely, T. D. (2012). Structure Building that can’t be. In Ways of Structure Building (ed. Uribe-Etxebarria, M. and Valmala, V.), pp. 253–270. Oxford University Press.
Epstein, S. D. and Seely, T. D. (2002). Rule applications as cycles in a level-free syntax. In Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program (ed. Epstein, S. D. and Seely, T. D.), pp. 65–89. Oxford: Blackwell.
Epstein, S. D. and Seely, T. D. (2006). Derivations in Minimalism. Cambridge University Press.
Etxepare, R. and Haddican, B. (2013). Repairing final-over-final constraint violations: Evidence from Basque verb clusters. Paper presented at GLOW 36.
Evans, N. and Levinson, S. C. (2009). The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(5), 429–492.
Fasanella-Seligrat, A. (2011). Els problemes de Plató, de Darwin i de Greenberg. Els Marges, 94, 18–36.
Fasanella-Seligrat, A. and Fortuny, J. (2011). Deriving linguistic variation from learnability conditions in a parametric approach to UG. Presented at the workshop Formal Grammar and Syntactic Variation, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
Feldman, J. et al. (2000). Minimization of Boolean complexity in human concept learning. Nature, 407(6804), 630–632.
Felix, S. (2010). Me and Chomsky. Remarks from someone who quit. In Language and Logos (ed. Hanneforth, T. and Fanselow, G.), pp. 64–71. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Ferrer i Cancho, R. and Forns, N. (2009). The self-organization of genomes. Complexity, 15, 34–36.
Fitch, W. T. (2009). Prolegomena to a future science of biolinguistics. Biolinguistics, 3(4), 283–320.
Fodor, J. A. (1998). In Critical Condition: Polemical Essays on Cognitive Science and the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fodor, J. D. (1998). Unambiguous triggers. Linguistic Inquiry, 29(1), 1–36.
Fortuny, J. (2008). The Emergence of Order in Syntax. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Fox, D. (2000). Economy and Semantic Interpretation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fox, D. (2002). Antecedent-contained deletion and the copy theory of movement. Linguistic Inquiry, 33(1), 63–96.
Frampton, J. and Gutmann, S. (2002). Crash-proof syntax. In Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program (ed. Epstein, S. D. and Seely, T. D.), pp. 90–105. Oxford: Blackwell.
Freidin, R. (1999). Cyclicity andminimalism. In Working Minimalism (ed. Epstein, S. D. and Hornstein, N.), pp. 95–126. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fujita, K. (2009). A prospect for evolutionary adequacy: Merge and the evolution and development of human language. Biolinguistics, 3(2), 128–153.
Fukui, N. (2006). Theoretical Comparative Syntax. London: Routledge.
Fukui, N. and Speas, M. (1986). Specifiers and projections. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 8, 128–172.
Fukui, N. and Zushi, M. (2008). On certain differences between noun phrases and clauses. In Essays on Nominal Determination (ed. Müller, H. H. and Klinge, A.), pp. 265–286. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gallego, Á. (2009). A note on C. MS, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Gallego, Á. (2011a). Lexical items and feature bundling. Presented at the workshop on Formal Grammar and Syntactic Variation, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
Gallego, Á. (2011b). Phase Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gallego, Á. (ed.) (2012). Phases: Developing the Framework. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gallego, Á. and Bosque, I. (2011). A subextraction puzzle and its consequences for cyclicity. MS, UCM & UAB.
Georgi, D. and Müller, G. (2010). Noun phrase structure by reprojection. Syntax, 13(1–36).
Gervain, J. and Mehler, J. (2010). Speech perception and language acquisition in the first year of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 191–218.
Gierer, A. and Meinhardt, H. (1972). A theory of biological pattern formation. Biological Cybernetics, 12(1), 30–39.
Giorgi, A. and Pianesi, F. (1997). Tense and Aspect: From Semantics to Morphosyntax. Oxford University Press.
Gould, S. J. (1997). Darwinian fundamentalism. New York Review of Books, 44, 34–37.
Grimshaw, J. (1991). Extended projection. MS, Brandeis University. [reprinted in 2005, In Words and Structure. CSLI Lecture Notes Number 151. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications]
Grohmann, K. K. (2003). Prolific Domains. On the Anti-Locality of Movement Dependencies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Grohmann, K. K. (2011). Anti-locality. In Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism (ed. Boeckx, C.), pp. 260–290. Oxford University Press.
Guardiano, C. and Longobardi, G. (2005). Parametric comparison and language taxonomy. In Grammaticalization and Parametric Variation (ed. Batllori, M., Hernanz, M.-L., Picallo, C., and Roca, F.), pp. 149–174. Oxford University Press.
Haegeman, L. (1994). Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Hale, K. and Keyser, S. J. (1993). On argument structure and the lexical expression of grammatical relations. In The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger (ed. Hale, K. and Keyser, S. J.), pp. 53–110. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hale, K. and Keyser, S. J. (2002). Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Halle, M. and Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20 (ed. Hale, K. and Keyser, S. J.), pp. 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Halle, M. and Marantz, A. (1994). Some key features of distributed morphology. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 21, 275–288.
Harbour, D. (2006). The elimination of geometry. MS, Queen Mary University of London.
Harbour, D. (2009). The semantics, and generality, of features: Or, how not to construct a theory of cognitive evolution. MS, Queen Mary University of London.
Harley, H. (2013). External arguments and the mirror principle: On the independence of voice and 𝜐. Lingua, 125, 34–57.
Harley, H. (forthcoming). On the identity of roots. Theoretical Linguistics.
Harley, H. and Noyer, R. (1999). Distributed morphology. Glot International, 4(4), 3–9.
Harley, H. and Ritter, E. (2002a). Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis. Language, 482–526.
Harley, H. and Ritter, E. (2002b). Structuring the bundle: A universal morphosyntactic feature geometry. In Pronouns – Grammar and Representation (ed. Weise, H. and Simon, H.), pp. 23–39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Haspelmath, M. (2008). Parametric versus functional explanations of syntactic universals. In The Limits of Syntactic Variation (ed. Biberauer, T.), pp. 75–107. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Haspelmath, M. (2010). Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in cross-linguistic studies. Language, 86(3), 663–687.
Hauser, M. D. (2001). Wild Minds: What Animals Really Think. New York: Owl Books.
Hauser, M. D. (2009). The possibility of impossible cultures. Nature, 460(7252), 190–196.
Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., and Fitch, W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569–1579.
Heine, B. and Kuteva, T. (2007). The Genesis of Grammar: A Reconstruction. Oxford University Press.
Heine, B. and Narrog, H. (eds.) (2010). Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis. Oxford University Press.
Herburger, E. (2000). What Counts: Focus and Quantification. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hinzen, W. (2006). Mind Design and Minimal Syntax. Oxford University Press.
Hinzen, W. (2007). An Essay on Naming and Truth. Oxford University Press.
Hinzen, W. (2008). Prospects for an explanatory theory of semantics. Biolinguistics, 2(4), 348–363.
Hinzen, W. (2011a). Emergence of a systemic semantics through minimal and underspecified codes. In The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty (ed. Di Sciullo, A. M. and Boeckx, C.), pp. 417–439. Oxford University Press.
Hinzen, W. (2011b). Language and thought. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism (ed. Boeckx, C.), pp. 499–522. Oxford University Press.
Hinzen, W. (2012). Phases and semantics. In Phases: Developing the Framework (ed. Gallego, Á.), pp. 309–342. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hinzen, W. (2013). Narrow syntax and the language of thought. Philosophical Psychology, 26(1), 1–23.
Hinzen, W. and Poeppel, D. (2011). Semantics between cognitive neuroscience and linguistic theory: Guest editors’ introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(9), 1297–1316.
Hinzen, W. and Reichard, U. (2011). The grammaticalization of thought. MS, University of Durham.
Hinzen, W. and Sheehan, M. (2013). The Philosophy of Universal Grammar. Oxford University Press.
Hiramatsu, K. (2000). Accessing linguistic competence: Evidence from children’s and adults’ acceptability judgments. Ph.D. thesis, University of Connecticut.
Hodges, A. (1983). The Enigma. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Holmberg, A. (2010). Parameters in minimalist theory: The case of Scandinavian. Theoretical Linguistics, 36(1), 1–48.
Holmberg, A. and Platzack, C. (1995). The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. Oxford University Press.
Hornstein, N. (2001). Move! A Minimalist Theory of Construal. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hornstein, N. (2009). A Theory of Syntax. Cambridge University Press.
Hornstein, N., Nunes, J., and Grohmann, K. K. (2006). Understanding Minimalism. Cambridge University Press.
Hornstein, N. and Pietroski, P.M. (2009). Basic operations:Minimal syntax–semantics. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 8, 113–139.
Hornstein, N. and Uriagereka, J. (2002). Reprojections. In Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program (ed. Epstein, S. D. and Seely, T. D.), pp. 106–132. Oxford: Blackwell.
Huang, C.-T. J. (1982). Logical Relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Ph.D. thesis, MIT.
Huang, C.-T. J. (2005). Analyticity. Class lectures, MIT/Harvard LSA Summer Institute.
Hurford, J. R. (2007). The Origins of Meaning. Oxford University Press.
Idsardi, W. and Raimy, E. (2013). Three types of Linearization and the temporal aspects of speech. In Principles of linearization (ed. Biberauer, T. and Roberts, I.), pp. 31–56. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Irurtzun, A. (2007). The grammar of focus at the interfaces. Ph.D. thesis, Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea.
Jackendoff, R. (1972). Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jackendoff, R. (1997). The Architecture of the Language Faculty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of Language. Oxford University Press.
Jackendoff, R. (2005). Alternative minimalist visions of language. In Proceedings from the 41st Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 2, pp. 189–226.
Jackendoff, R. (2010). Meaning and the Lexicon: The Parallel Architecture 1975–2010. Oxford University Press.
Jackendoff, R. (2011). What is the human language faculty? Two views. Language, 87(3), 586–624.
Jenks, P. (2010). Evidence for the syntactic diversity of numeral classifiers. MS, Harvard University.
Jenks, P. (2012). Definite spans and blocking in classifier languages. MS, UC Berkeley.
Jeong, Y. (2007). Applicatives: Structure and Interpretation from a Minimalist Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jeong, Y. (2011). Re-examining the “NP/DP” parameter in light of the diversity of East-Asian classifiers. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics (ed. Otsu, Y.), Tokyo, pp. 113–131.
Jiang, L. J. (2012). Nominal arguments and language variation. Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University.
Johnson, K. (2010). A remerge theory of movement. MS, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Johnson, K. (2012). Towards deriving differences in how wh-movement and QR are pronounced. Lingua, 122(6), 529–553.
Jurka, J. (2010). The importance of being a complement: CED effects revisited. Ph.D. thesis, University of Maryland.
Kagawa, H., Yamada, H., Lin, R.-S., Mizuta, T., Hasegawa, T., and Okanoya, K. (2012). Ecological correlates of song complexity in white-rumped Munias: The implication of relaxation of selection as a cause for signal variation in birdsong. Interaction Studies, 13(2), 263–284.
Kato, Takaomi (2007). Symmetries in coordination. Ph.D. dissertation. Harvard University.
Katz, J. and Pesetsky, D. (2009). The identity thesis for language and music. MS, MIT.
Kayne, R. S. (1984). Connectedness and Binary Branching. Dordrecht: Foris.
Kayne, R. S. (1994). The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kayne, R. S. (1997). The English complementizer of. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 1(1), 43–54.
Kayne, R. S. (2005). Movement and Silence. Oxford University Press.
Kayne, R. S. (2010). Why isn’t this a complementizer? In Principles and Contrasts (ed. Kayne, R.), pp. 190–227. Oxford University Press.
Kayne, R. S. (2011). Antisymmetry and the lexicon. In The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty (ed. Sciullo, A.-M. di and Boeckx, C.), pp. 329–353. Oxford University Press.
Kemp, C., Perfors, A., and Tenenbaum, J. B. (2007). Learning overhypotheses with hierarchical Bayesian models. Developmental Science, 10(3), 307–321.
Kibort, A. and Corbett, G. (ed.) (2010). Features. Perspectives on a Key Notion in Linguistics. Oxford University Press.
Kinsella, A. R. (2009). Language Evolution and Syntactic Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Koopman, H. (2005). On the parallelism of DPs and clauses: Evidence from Kisongo Maasai. In Verb First: On the Syntax of Verb-Initial Languages (ed. Carnie, A., Dooley, S., and Harley, H.), pp. 281–301. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Koster, J. (1987). Domains and Dynasties: The Radical Autonomy of Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.
Koster, J. (2009). Ceaseless, unpredictable creativity: Language as technology. Biolinguistics, 3(1), 61–92.
Koster, J. (2010). Language and tools. MS, Universiteit Groningen.
Krifka, M. (1992). Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution. In Lexical Matters (ed. Sag, I. and Szabolcsi, A.), pp. 29–53. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Kural, M. (2005). Tree traversal and word order. Linguistic Inquiry, 36(3), 367–387.
Lahne, A. (2008). Where there is fire there is smoke. Local modelling of successive cyclic movement. Ph.D. thesis, Universität Leipzig.
Lakoff, G. (1970). Irregularity in Syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Landau, I. (2013). Agreement at PF: An argument from partial control. MS, Ben Gurion University.
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Nouns and verbs. Language, 63, 53–94.
Langacker, R. W. (1999). Grammar and Conceptualization. Volume XIV. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Larson, R. K. (1987). “Missing prepositions” and the analysis of English free relative clauses. Linguistic Inquiry, 18(2), 239–266.
Larson, R. K. (1988). On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry, 19(3), 335–391.
Lasnik, H. (1999). Minimalist Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lasnik, H. (2000). Syntactic Structures Revisited. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lasnik, H. (2001). When can you save a structure by destroying it? In Proceedings of NELS 31, pp. 301–320. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
Lasnik, H. (2002). “All I ever wanted to be was a teacher!” An interview conducted by L. Cheng and R. Sybesma. Glot International, 6(9–10), 320–328.
Lasnik, H. (2005). Review of Jason Merchant, The Syntax of Silence. Language, 81, 259–265.
Lasnik, H. (2006). Conceptions of the cycle. In Wh-movement: Moving On (ed. Cheng, L. and Corver, N.), pp. 197–216. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lasnik, H. and Saito, M. (1992). Move 𝛼. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Legate, J. A. (2002). Walpiri: theoretical implications. Ph.D. thesis, MIT.
Legate, J. A. (2011). Under-inheritance. MS, University of Pennsylvania. [presented at NELS42]
Legate, J. A. and Yang, C. (2012). Assessing child and adult grammar. In Rich Languages from Poor Inputs (ed. Berwick, R. and Piattelli-Palmarini, M.), pp. 168–182. Oxford University Press.
Leiber, J. (2002). Philosophy, engineering, biology, and history: A vindication of Turing’s views about the distinction between the cognitive and physical sciences. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 14(1), 29–37.
Lenneberg, E. H. (1963). The relationship of language to the formation of concepts. In Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science (Proceedings of the Boston Colloquium for the Philosophy of Science 1961/1962) (ed. Wartofsky, M.), pp. 48–54. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Lenneberg, E. H. (1964). A biological perspective of language. In New Directions in the Study of Language (ed. Lenneberg, E.), pp. 65–88. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Leu, T. (2008). The internal syntax of determiners. Ph.D. thesis, NYU.
Leu, T. (2012). The indefinite article – indefinite? – indefitive? – article? University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 18(1), 19.
Lewontin, R. C. (2000). The Triple Helix: Gene, Organism, and Environment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lohndal, T. (2012). Without specifiers: Phrase structure and events. Ph.D. thesis, University of Maryland.
Lohndal, T. and Uriagereka, J. (2010). The logic of parametric theory. Theoretical Linguistics, 36, 69–76.
Longa, V. M. and Lorenzo, G. (2008). What about a (really) minimalist theory of language acquisition? Linguistics, 46(3), 541–570.
Longa, V. M. and Lorenzo, G. (2012). Theoretical linguistics meets development: Explaining FL from an epigeniticist point of view. In Language from a Biological Point of View: Current Issues in Biolinguistics (ed. Boeckx, C., Horno, M., and Mendívil Giró, J.), pp. 52–84. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Scholars.
Longa, V. M., Lorenzo, G., and Rigau, G. (1996). Expressing modality by recycling clitics. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics, 5(1), 67–79.
Longa, V. M., Lorenzo, G., and Rigau, G. (1998). Subject clitics and clitic recycling: Locative sentences in some Iberian Romance languages. Journal of Linguistics, 34, 125–164.
Longobardi, G. (1994). Reference and proper names: A theory of N-movement in syntax and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry, 25(4), 609–665.
Longobardi, G. (2004). Methods in parametric linguistics and cognitive history. Linguistic Variation Yearbook, 3, 101–138.
Longobardi, G. (2005a). A minimalist program for parametric linguistics? In Organizing Grammar (ed. Broekhuis, H., Corver, N., Huybregts, R., Kleinhenz, U., and Koster, J.), pp. 407–414. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Longobardi, G. (2005b). Toward a unified grammar of reference. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 24(1), 5–44.
Longobardi, G. (2006). Reference to individuals, person, and the variety of mapping parameters. In Essays on Nominal Determination (ed. Müller, H. H. and Klinge, A.), pp. 189–211. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Longobardi, G. and Guardiano, C. (2011). The biolinguistic program and historical reconstruction. In The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty (ed. Di Sciullo, A. M. and Boeckx, C.), pp. 266–304. Oxford University Press.
Lorenz, K. (1959). Psychologie und Stammesgeschichte. In Evolution der Organismen (ed. Heberer, G.), pp. 131–170. Stuttgart: Fischer.
Lorenzo, G. (2013). Beyond developmental compatibility: A note on generative linguistics and the developmentalist challenge. Teorema, 32, 29–44.
Lorenzo, G. and Longa, V. M. (2003). Minimizing the genes for grammar: Theminimalist program as a biological framework for the study of language. Lingua, 113(7), 643–657.
Lorenzo, G. and Longa, V. M. (Lorenzo, G. and Longa, V. M. 2009). Beyond generative geneticism: Rethinking language acquisition from a developmentalist point of view. Lingua, 119(9), 1300–1315.
McBrearty, S. and Brooks, A. S. (2000). The revolution that wasn’t: A new interpretation of the origin of modern human behavior. Journal of Human Evolution, 39(5), 453–563.
Manzini, M. R. and Savoia, L. M. (2011). Grammatical Categories: Variation in Romance Languages. Volume 128. Cambridge University Press.
Marantz, A. (1984). On the Nature of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Marantz, A. (1991). Case and licensing. In Proceedings of ESCOL’91, pp. 234–253.
Marantz, A. (1995). The minimalist program. In Government and Binding and the Minimalist Program (ed. Webelhuth, G.), pp. 349–382. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Marantz, A. (1996). Cat as a phrasal idiom. MS, MIT.
Marantz, A. (1997). No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 4(2), 201–225.
Marantz, A. (2000). Words. Handout, MIT.
Marantz, A. (2005). Generative linguistics within the cognitive neuroscience of language. Linguistic Review, 22(2–4), 429–446.
Marantz, A. (2008). Words and phases. In Phases in the Theory of Grammar (ed. Choe, S.-H.), pp. 191–222. Seoul: Dong In.
Marantz, A. (2013). Verbal argument structure: Events and participants. Lingua, 130, 152–168.
Marcus, G. (2006). Cognitive architecture and descent with modification. Cognition, 101(2), 443–465.
Martín, F. J. (2012). Deconstructing Catalan object clitics. Ph.D. thesis, New York University.
Marušič, F. (2005). On non-simultaneous phases. Ph.D. thesis, Stony Brook University.
Marvin, T. (2002). Topics in the stress and syntax of words. Ph.D. thesis, MIT.
Masullo, P. J. (2008). The syntax–lexical semantics interface: Prepositionalizing motion verbs in Spanish. MS, University of Pittsburgh.
Mateu, J. (2005). Impossible primitives. In The Compositionality of Meaning and Content (ed. Werning, M., Machery, E., and Schurz, G.), pp. 213–229. Heusenstamm: Ontos Verlag.
Mathieu, E. (2011). Wh-in-situ and external parameters. Presented at the workshop Formal Grammar and Syntactic Variation, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
Mathieu, E. and Barrie, M. (2011). Macroparameters don’t exist: The case of polysynthesis and noun incorporation. Presented at the workshop Formal Grammar and Syntactic Variation, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
Mayr, E. (1959). Darwin and the evolutionary theory in biology. In Evolution and Anthropology: A Centennial Appraisal (ed. Meggers, J.), pp. 1–10. The Anthropological Society of Washington, Washington D.C.
Medina, M. L. (2010). Two “evo-devos.” Biological Theory, 5, 7–11.
Mellars, P., Boyle, K., Bar-Yosef, O., and Stringer, C. (eds.) (2007). Rethinking the Human Revolution. Cambridge, UK: McDonald Institute Monographs.
Merchant, J. (2001). The Syntax of Silence: Sluicing, Islands, and Identity in Ellipsis. Oxford University Press.
Miller, G. and Chomsky, N. (1963). Finitary models of language users. In Handbook of Mathematical Psychology (ed. Luce, R. D., Bush, R., and Galanter, E.), pp. 419–491. New York: Wiley.
Mitrović, M. (2013). The composition of logical constants. MS, University of Cambridge.
Miyagawa, S. (2010). Why Agree; Why Move. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Moro, A. (2000). Dynamic Antisymmetry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Müller, G. (2010). On deriving CED effects from the PIC. Linguistic Inquiry, 41, 35–82.
Muysken, P. and van Riemsdijk, H. (ed.) (1986). Features and Projections. Volume XXV. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Narita, H. (2010a). Phasing in full interpretation. Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University.
Narita, H. (2010b). The tension between explanatory and biological adequacy. A review of Theoretical Comparative Syntax: Studies in Macroparameters, Naoki Fukui, Routledge, London and New York (2006). Lingua, 120, 1313–1323.
Newell, H. (2008). Aspects of the morphology and phonology of phases. Ph.D. thesis, McGill University.
Newmeyer, F. (2004). Against a parameter-setting approach to language variation. Linguistic Variation Yearbook, 4, 181–234.
Newmeyer, F. J. (2005). Possible and Probable Languages: A Generative Perspective on Linguistic Typology. Oxford University Press.
Nicolis, M. (2008). The null subject parameter and correlating properties: The case of Creole languages. In The Limits of Variation (ed. Biberauer, T.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Niyogi, P. and Berwick, R. C. (1996). A language learning model for finite parameter spaces. Cognition, 61(1), 161–193.
Nunes, J. (2004). Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Obata, M. (2010). Root, successive-cyclic and feature-splitting internal merge: implications for feature-inheritance and transfer. Ph.D. thesis, University of Michigan.
Ochi, M. (2010). Classifiers and nominal structure: A parametric approach and its consequences. MS, Osaka University.
Okanoya, K. (2012). Behavioural factors governing song complexity in Bengalese Finches. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 25, 44–59.
Osborne, T., Putnam, M., and Gross, T. M. (2011). Bare phrase structure, label-less trees, and specifier-less syntax: Is minimalism becoming a dependency grammar? Linguistic Review, 28(3), 315–364.
Otero, C. (1976). The dictionary in a generative grammar. Presented at the 91st Annual Convention of the MLA, New York.
Otero, C. (1983). Towards a model of paradigmatic grammar. Quaderni di Semantica, 4, 134–144.
Otero, C. (1996). Head movement, cliticization, precompilation, and word insertion (comments on Uriagereka’s paper). In Current Issues in Comparative Grammar (ed. Freidin, R.), pp. 296–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Ott, D. (2008). Notes on noun ph(r)ases. MS, Harvard University.
Ott, D. (2009a). The conceptual necessity of phases: Some remarks on the minimalist enterprise. In Explorations of Phase Theory: Interpretation at the Interfaces (ed. Grohmann, K.), pp. 253–275. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ott, D. (2009b). Stylistic Fronting as Remnant Movement. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax, 83, 141–178.
Ott, D. (2009c). The evolution of I-Language: Lexicalization as the key evolutionary novelty. Biolinguistics, 3(2), 255–269.
Ott, D. (2011). A note on free relative clauses in the theory of phases. Linguistic Inquiry, 42, 183–192.
Ouali, H. (2007). Unifying agreement relations: A minimalist analysis of Berber. Ph.D. thesis, University of Michigan.
Ouhalla, J. (1991). Functional Categories and Parametric Variation. London: Routledge.
Pantcheva, M. (2011). Decomposing path: The nanosyntax of directional expressions. Ph.D. thesis, Universitetet i Troms𝜙.
Parsons, T. (1990). Events in the Semantics of English. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pearl, L. S. (2007). Necessary bias in natural language learning. Ph.D. thesis, University of Maryland.
Pesetsky, D. (1995). Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pesetsky, D. and Torrego, E. (2001). T-to-C movement: Causes and consequences. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language (ed. Kenstowicz, M.), pp. 355–426. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pesetsky, D. and Torrego, E. (2007). The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In Phrasal and Clausal Architecture: Syntactic Derivation and Interpretation (ed. Karimi, S., Samiian, V., and Wilkins, W.), pp. 262–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Phillips, C. (2006). The real-time status of island phenomena. Language, 82(4), 795–823.
Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (1989). Evolution, selection and cognition: from ‘learning’ to parameter setting in biology and in the study of language. Cognition, 31, 1–44.
Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (2010). What is language that it may have evolved, and what is evolution that it may apply to language? In The Evolution of Human Language: Biolinguistic Perspectives (ed. Larson, R., Déprez, H., and Yamakido, V.), pp. 148–162. Cambridge University Press.
Piattelli-Palmarini, M. and Uriagereka, J. (2005). The evolution of the narrow language faculty: The skeptical view and a reasonable conjecture. Lingue e Linguaggio, 4, 27–79.
Piattelli-Palmarini, M. and Uriagereka, J. (2011). FoxP2: A geneticist’s dream; a linguist’s nightmare. In The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty (ed. Sciullo, A.-M. di and Boeckx, C.), pp. 100–125. Oxford University Press.
Picallo, M. C. (2006). On gender and number. MS, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Picallo, M. C. (2008). On gender and number in Romance. Lingue e Linguaggio, 1, 44–66.
Piera, C. (1985). On the representation of higher order complex words. In Selected Papers from XIII Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, Chapel Hill, NC, 24–26 March 1983, pp. 287–313. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pietroski, P. M. (2003a). Quantification and second-order monadicity. Philosophical Perspectives, 17, 259–298.
Pietroski, P. M. (2003b). Small verbs, complex events: Analyticity without synonymy. In Chomsky and His Critics (ed. Hornstein, N. and Antony, L.), pp. 179–214. Oxford: Wiley.
Pietroski, P. M. (2005). Events and Semantic Architecture. Oxford University Press.
Pietroski, P. M. (2007). Systematicity via monadicity. Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 7, 343–374.
Pietroski, P. M. (2008). Minimalist meaning, internalist interpretation. Biolinguistics, 2(4), 317–341.
Pietroski, P. M. (2010). Concepts, meanings and truth: First nature, second nature and hard work. Mind & Language, 25(3), 247–278.
Pietroski, P. M. (2011). Minimal semantic instructions. In Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism (ed. Boeckx, C.), pp. 472–498. Oxford University Press.
Pietroski, P. M. (2012). Language and conceptual reanalysis. In Towards a Biolinguistic Understanding of Grammar: Essays on Interfaces (ed. Di Sciullo, A.). Ansermenn: John Benjamins.
Pietroski, P. M. (forthcoming). Conjoining Meanings: Semantics without Truth Values. Oxford University Press.
Pinker, S. and Bloom, P. (1990). Natural selection and natural language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 707–784.
Pinker, S. and Jackendoff, R. (2005). The faculty of language: What’s special about it? Cognition, 95(2), 201–236.
Poeppel, D. (2005). The interdisciplinary study of language and its challenges. Technical report, Jahrbuch des Wissenschaftskollegs zu Berlin.
Poeppel, D. (2012). The maps problem and the mapping problem: Two challenges for a cognitive neuroscience of speech and language. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 29(1–2), 34–55.
Poeppel, D. and Embick, D. (2005). Defining the relation between linguistics and neuroscience. In Twenty-first Century Psycholinguistics: Four Cornerstones (ed. Cutler, A.), pp. 173–189. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pourquié, O. (2003). The segmentation clock: Converting embryonic time into spatial pattern. Science Signaling, 301(5631), 328.
Pullum, G. K. (1996). Nostalgic views from Building 20. Journal of Linguistics, 32(1), 137–147.
Pylkkänen, L. (2002). Introducing arguments. Ph.D. thesis, MIT.
Pylkkänen, L. (2008). Introducing Arguments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ramchand, G. (2008). Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First-Phase Syntax. Cambridge University Press.
Ramchand, G. and Svenonius, P. (2008). Mapping a parochial lexicon onto a universal semantics. In The Limits of Syntactic Variation (ed. Biberauer, T.), pp. 219–245. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ramchand, G. and Svenonius, P. (2013). Deriving the functional hierarchy. Presented at 36th GLOW Colloquium, Lunds Universitet.
Raposo, E. (2002). Nominal gaps with prepositional modifiers in Portuguese and Spanish: A case for quick spell-out. Cuadernos de Lingüística del I. U. Ortega y Gasset, 9, 127–144.
Reinhart, T. (2006). Interface Strategies: Optimal and Costly Computations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Reinhart, T. and Siloni, T. (2005). The lexicon–syntax parameter: Reflexivization and other arity operations. Linguistic Inquiry, 36(3), 389–436.
Reiss, C. (2003). Quantification in structural descriptions: Attested and unattested patterns. Linguistic Review, 20(2–4), 305–338.
Richards, M. (2004). Object shift and scrambling in North and West Germanic: A case study in symmetrical syntax. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.
Richards, M. (2007). On feature inheritance: An argument from the phase impenetrability condition. Linguistic Inquiry, 38(3), 563–572.
Richards, M. (2008a). Two kinds of variation in a minimalist system. Linguistische Arbeits Berichte, 87, 133–162.
Richards, M. (2009a). Internal pair-merge: The missing mode of movement. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 8, 55–73.
Richards, M. (2009b). Stabilizing syntax: On instability, optionality, and other indeterminacies. Presented at the Syntax workshop, Universität Stuttgart, March 2010.
Richards, M. (2011). Deriving the edge: What’s in a phase? Syntax, 14, 74–95.
Richards, M. (2012). On feature inheritance, defective phases, and the movement–morphology connection. In Phases: Developing the Framework (ed. Gallego, Á.), pp. 195–232. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Richards, N. (2001). Movement in Language: Interactions and Architectures. Oxford University Press.
Richards, N. (2008b). Lardil ‘case stacking’ and the structural/inherent case distinction. MS, MIT.
Richards, N. (2010). Uttering Trees. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rizzi, L. (1978). Violations of the wh-island condition in Italian and the subjacency condition. Montreal Working Papers in Linguistics.
Rizzi, L. (1982). Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.
Rizzi, L. (1986). Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry, 17(3), 501–557.
Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar: Handbook in Generative Syntax (ed. Haegeman, L.), pp. 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Rizzi, L. (2001). On the position“Int(errogative)” in the left periphery of the clause. In Current Studies in Italian Syntax (ed. Cinque, G. and Salvi, G.), pp. 287–296. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Rizzi, L. (2004). On the cartography of syntactic structures. In The Structure of CP and IP (ed. Rizzi, L.), pp. 3–15. Oxford University Press.
Rizzi, L. (2006). Grammatically-based target-inconsistencies in child language. In The Proceedings of the Inaugural Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition – North America (ed. Deen, K., Nomura, J., Schulz, B., and Schwartz, B.), pp. 19–49. University of Connecticut Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 4.
Rizzi, L. (2009). Some elements of syntactic computation. In Biological Foundations and Origin of Syntax (ed. Bickerton, D. and Szathmáry, E.), pp. 63–88. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rizzi, L. (2010). On the elements of syntactic variation. Presented at the workshop on linguistic variation and the minimalist program, Barcelona, January 2010.
Rizzi, L. and Shlonsky, U. (2007). Strategies of subject extraction. In Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Chomsky’s Minimalism and the View from Semantics (ed. Sauerland, U. and Gärtner, H.-M.), pp. 115–160. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Roberts, I. G. (2001). Language change and learnability. In Language Acquisition and Learnability (ed. Bertolo, S.), pp. 81–125. Cambridge University Press.
Roberts, I. G. (2010a). Agreement and Head Movement: Clitics, Incorporation, and Defective Goals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Roberts, I. G. (2010b). On the nature of syntactic parameters: A programme for research. Presented at the 2010 Mayfest ‘Bridging Typology and Acquisition.’
Roberts, I. G. (2011). Parametric hierarchies: Some observations. Presented at the workshop on linguistic variation and the minimalist program, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid.
Roberts, I. G. and Holmberg, A. (2009). Introduction: Parameters in minimalist theory. In Parametric Variation: Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory (ed. Biberauer, T., Holmberg, A., Roberts, I., and Sheehan, M.), pp. 1–57. Cambridge University Press.
Ross, J. R. (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax. Ph.D. thesis, MIT.
Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., and Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-monthold infants. Science, 274, 1926–1928.
Safir, K. (2014). One true anaphor. Linguistic Inquiry, 45, 91–124.
Saito, M., Lin, T. H. J., and Murasugi, K. (2008). N-ellipsis and the structure of noun phrases in Chinese and Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 17(3), 247–271.
Sakas, W. G. and Fodor, J. D. (2012). Disambiguating syntactic triggers. Language Acquisition, 19(2), 83–143.
Samuels, B. (2009). The structure of phonological theory. Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University.
Samuels, B. (2010). Consequences of phases for morphophonology. In Phases: Developing the Framework (ed. Gallego, A.), pp. 251–282. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Samuels, B. (2011a). A minimalist program for phonology. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism (ed. Boeckx, C.), pp. 574–594. Oxford University Press.
Samuels, B. (2011b). Phonological Architecture: A Biolinguistic Perspective. Oxford University Press.
Samuels, B. (2012a). Animal minds and the roots of human language. In Language, from a Biological Point of View (ed. Boeckx, C., Mendívil Giró, J., and Horno, M.), pp. 290–313. Cambridge UK: Cambridge Scholars.
Samuels, B. (2012b). The emergence of phonological forms. In Towards a Biolinguistic Understanding of Grammar (ed. Di Sciullo, A.), pp. 193–213. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Samuels, B., Hauser, M. D., and Boeckx, C. (in press). Do animals have Universal Grammar? A case study in phonology. In The Oxford Handbook of Universal Grammar (ed. Roberts, I.). Oxford University Press.
Saunders, P. T. (1992). Collected Works of A. M. Turing: Morphogenesis. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Savescu Ciucivara, O. and Wood, J. (2010). Re-prefixation and Talmy’s parameter. In Proceedings of NELS 36, pp. 2–13.
Schein, B. (1993). Plurals and Events. Volume XXIII. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Schein, B. (2002). Events and the semantic content of thematic relations. In Logical Form and Language (ed. Preyer, G. and Peter, G.), pp. 263–344. Oxford University Press.
Schneider-Zioga, K. (2013). The linker in kinande re-examined. MS, California State University.
Searle, J. (1972). Chomsky’s revolution in linguistics. New York Review of Books, 18(12), 16–24.
Searle, J. (2006). What is language: Some preliminary remarks. MS, UC Berkeley.
Sheehan, M. (2013). Towards a general alignment parameter hierarchy. In Proceedings of the 31st West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Gascadilla.
Shlonsky, U. (2006). Extended projection and CP cartography. Nouveaux cahiers de linguistique française, 27, 83–93.
Sigurdsson, H. Á. (2004a). Meaningful silence, meaningless sounds. Linguistic Variation Yearbook, 4(1), 235–259.
Sigurdsson, H. Á. (2004b). The syntax of person, tense, and speech features. Rivista di linguistica, 16, 219–251.
Sigurdsson, H. Á. (2011). On UG and materialization. Linguistic Analysis, 37, 367–388.
Šimík, R. (2011). The elimination of formal wh-features and a theory of free wh-movement. MS, Universität Potsdam.
Simpson, A. (2005). Classifiers and DP structure in Southeast Asia. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax (ed. Cinque, G. and Kayne, R.), pp. 806–838. Oxford University Press.
Smith, N. and Law, A. (2009). On parametric (and non-parametric) variation. Biolinguistics, 3(4), 332–343.
Snyder, W. (1995). Language acquisition and language variation: The role of morphology. Ph.D. thesis, MIT.
Snyder, W. (2000). An experimental investigation of syntactic satiation effects. Linguistic Inquiry, 31(3), 575–582.
Snyder, W. (2001). On the nature of syntactic variation: Evidence from complex predicates and complex word-formation. Language, 77(2), 324–342.
Snyder, W. (2011). On language acquisition and syntactic theory. Presented at 50 Years of Linguistics at MIT.
Son, M. (2006). Directed motion and non-predicative Path P. Nordlyd: Troms𝜙 Working Papers on Language and Linguistics, 176–199.
Son, M. and Svenonius, P. (forthcoming). Microparameters of cross-linguistic variation: Directed motion and resultatives. In Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics.
Speas, P. (2010). The minimal structure of the left periphery. Presented at the Language Design conference, UQAM, Montreal, May 2010.
Speas, P. and Tenny, C. (2003). Configurational properties of point of view roles. In Asymmetry in Grammar Vol-I: Syntax and Semantics (ed. Sciullo, A.-M. di), pp. 315–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Spelke, E. (2003). What makes us smart? Core knowledge and natural language. In Language and Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought (ed. Gentner, D. and Goldin-Meadow, S.), pp. 277–311. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Spelke, E. and Kinzler, K. D. (2007). Core knowledge. Developmental Science, 10(1), 89–96.
Sprouse, J. (2007). A program for experimental syntax. Ph.D. thesis, University of Maryland.
Sprouse, J. and Lau, E. (2013). Syntax and the brain. In The Handbook of Generative Syntax (ed. den Dikken, M.), pp. 971–1005. Cambridge University Press.
Starke, M. (2001). Move dissolves into merge. Ph.D. thesis, Université de Genève.
Starke, M. (2010). Nanosyntax: A short primer to a new approach to language. Nordlyd, 36, 1–6.
Stepanov, A. (2001). Cyclic domains in syntactic theory. Ph.D. thesis, University of Connecticut.
Stepanov, A. (2007). The end of CED? Minimalism and extraction domains. Syntax, 10(1), 80–126.
Stepanov, A. and Stateva, P. (2006). Successive cyclicity as residual wh-scope marking. Lingua, 116(12), 2107–2153.
Stuhlmueller, A., Tenenbaum, J. B., and Goodman, N. D. (2010). Learning structured generative concepts. Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
Sugisaki, K. (2011). Preposition stranding: Its parametric variation and acquisition. Paper presented at the Workshop on Verbal Elasticity, Bellaterra, October 2011.
Svenonius, P. (2007). Adpositions, particles and the arguments they introduce. In Argument Structure (ed. Bhattacharya, K. S. T. and Reuland, E.), pp. 63–103. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Svenonius, P. (2012a). Lexical insertion in two stages. MS, Universitetet i Troms𝜙.
Svenonius, P. (2012b). Merge, project, and bundle. MS, Universitetet i Troms𝜙.
Svenonius, P. (2012c). Spanning. MS, Universitetet i Troms𝜙.
Svenonius, P., Ramchand, G., Taraldsen, T., and Starke, M. (eds.) (2009). Nordlyd 36. Special issue on Nanosyntax. Universitetet i Troms𝜙.
Szabolcsi, A. (1984). The possessor that ran away from home. Linguistic Review, 3, 89–102.
Szabolcsi, A. (2006). Strong vs. weak islands. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax (ed. Everaert, M. and van Riemsdijk, H.), vol. IV, pp. 479–531. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Takahashi, S. (2010). The hidden side of clausal complements. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 28, 343–380.
Takahashi, S. and Hulsey, S. (2009). Wholesale late merger: Beyond the A/Adistinction. Linguistic Inquiry, 40, 387–426.
Tattersall, I. (1998). Becoming Human: Evolution and Human Uniqueness. Oxford University Press.
Taylor, H. (2009). The complementizer the. In Little Words (ed. Leow, R., Campos, H., and Lardiere, D.), pp. 87–98. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Tokizaki, H. (2010). Recursive compounds and wordstress location. Paper presented at On Linguistic Interfaces II, University of Ulster, Belfast, Ireland.
Toyoshima, T. (2011). Parameterized linearization of multidominance bare phrase structures. Presented at the Parallel Domains workshop, University of Southern California.
Truswell, R. (2007). Locality of Wh-movement and the individuation of events. Ph.D. thesis, University College London.
Tsai, W. D. (2010). High applicatives are not high enough: A cartographic solution. MS, Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Tungseth, M. E. (2008). Verbal Prepositions and Argument Structure: Path, Place and Possession in Norwegian. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Turing, A. M. (1936). On computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 2(42), 230–265.
Turing, A. M. (1952). The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, 237, 37–72.
Turing, A. M. and Wardlaw, C. (1953 [1992]). A diffusion reaction theory of morphogenesis in plants. In Collected Works of A. M. Turing: Morphogenesis (ed. Saunders, P. T.), pp. 37–118. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Uriagereka, J. (1988). On government. Ph.D. thesis, University of Connecticut.
Uriagereka, J. (1998). Rhyme and Reason: An Introduction to Minimalist Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Uriagereka, J. (1999). Multiple spell-out. In Working Minimalism (ed. Epstein, S. D. and Hornstein, N.), pp. 251–282. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Uriagereka, J. (2008). Syntactic Anchors: On Semantic Structuring. Cambridge University Press.
Uriagereka, J. (2012). Spell-Out and the Minimalist Program. Oxford University Press.
van Craenenbroeck, J. and van Koppen, M. (2002). The locality of agreement and the CP-domain. Presented at 25th GLOW Colloquium.
van Riemsdijk, H. (2008). Identity avoidance: OCP-effects in Swiss Relatives. In Foundational Issues in Linguistics (ed. Freidin, R., Otero, C., and Zubizarreta, M.-L.), pp. 227–250. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Watanabe, A. (1995). Conceptual basis of cyclicity. In MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 27, pp. 269–291.
Watanabe, A. (2009). Vague quantity, numerals, and natural numbers. Syntax, 13(1), 37–77.
Webelhuth, G. (1992). Principles and Parameters of Syntactic Saturation. Oxford University Press.
West-Eberhard, M. J. (2003). Developmental Plasticity and Evolution. Oxford University Press.
Wexler, K. (1998). Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: A new explanation of the optional infinitive stage. Lingua, 106, 23–79.
Williams, A. (2009). Themes, cumulativity, and resultatives: Comments on Kratzer 2003. Linguistic Inquiry, 40(4), 686–700.
Williams, N. A., Close, J. P., Giouzeli, M., and Crow, T. J. (2006). Accelerated evolution of protocadherin11X/Y: A candidate gene-pair for cerebral asymmetry and language. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics, 141(6), 623–633.
Wiltschko, M. (2009). The composition of INFL. An exploration of tense, tenseless languages and tenseless constructions. MS, University of British Columbia.
Yang, C. (2002). Knowledge and Learning in Natural Language. Oxford University Press.
Yang, C. (2004). Universal Grammar, statistics or both? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(10), 451–456.
Yang, C. (2005). On productivity. Linguistic Variation Yearbook, 5(1), 265–302.
Yang, C. (2010). Three factors in language acquisition. Lingua, 120, 1160–1177.
Yip, M.J. (2006). The search for phonology in other species. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(10), 442–446.
Zanuttini, R. (2010). A syntactic analysis of interpretive restrictions on imperative, promissive, and exhortative subjects. MS, Yale University.
