Aakvik, A. and Tjotta, S., ‘Do collective actions clear common air? The effect of international environmental protocols on sulphur emissions’ (2011) 27, European Journal of Political Economy, 343–51
Abbott, K. W., ‘Modern international relations theory: a prospectus for international lawyers’ (1989) 14, Yale Journal of International Law, 335–411
Abbott, K. W. and Snidal, D., ‘Why states act through formal international organizations’ (1998) 42, The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 3–32
Adams, R. D. and McCormick, K., ‘The traditional distinction between public and private goods needs to be expanded, not abandoned’ (1993) 5, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 109–16
Adede, A. O., ‘Amendment procedures for conventions with technical annexes: the IMCO experience’ (1977) 17, Virginia Journal of International Law, 201–15
Adede, A. O., ‘Towards new approaches to treaty-making in the field of environment’ (1994) 1, African Yearbook of International Law, 81–121
Akanle, T., Appleton, A., Schulz, A. and Sommerville, M., ‘Summary of the Tianjin climate change talks: 4–9 October 2010’ (2010) 12, Earth Negotiations Bulletin, 1–17
Amerasinghe, C. F., ‘Theory with practical effects: Is international law neither fish nor fowl?’ (1999) 37, Archiv für Völkerrecht, 1–24
Amerasinghe, C. F., Principles of the institutional law of international organizations, Cambridge studies in international and comparative law, 2nd rev. edn (Cambridge University Press, 2005)
Andresen, S., ‘The effectiveness of UN environmental institutions’ (2007) 7, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 317–36
Andresen, S. and Hey, E., ‘The effectiveness and legitimacy of international environmental institutions’ (2005) 5, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 211–26
Archer, C., International organizations, 3rd edn (London: Routledge, 2001)
Asamoah, O. Y., The legal significance of the declarations of the General Assembly of the United Nations (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1966)
Aust, A., Modern treaty law and practice, 2nd edn (Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007)
Austin, J., Lectures on jurisprudence or the philosophy of positive law, 5th edn (London: John Murray, 1885), I
Ballreich, H., ‘Wesen und Wirkung des “Konsens” im Völkerrecht’, in H. Ballreich, R. Bernhardt and H. Mosler (eds.), Völkerrecht als Rechtsordnung, internationale Gerichtsbarkeit, Menschenrechte: Festschrift für Hermann Mosler, Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht (Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer, 1983), vol. 81, pp. 1–24
Barnhoorn, L. A. N. M. and Wellens, K. (eds.), Diversity in secondary rules and unity of international law (The Hague: Brill, 1995)
Barrett, J., ‘The negotiation and drafting of the climate change convention’, in R. R. Churchill and D. Freestone (eds.), International law and climate change: prospects for progress in the legal order (London, Dordrecht: Graham & Trotman, Martinus Nijhoff, 1991), pp. 183–200
Bauer, S., ‘Does bureaucracy really matter? The authority of intergovernmental treaty secretariats in global environmental politics’ (2006) 6, Global Environmental Politics, 23–49
Baumert, K. A., ‘Participation of developing countries in the international climate change regime: lessons for the future’ (2006) 38, The George Washington International Law Review, 365–407
Bausch, C. and Mehling, M., ‘“Alive and kicking”: the first meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol’ (2006) 15, Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 193–201
Baxter, R. R., ‘International law in “her infinite variety”’ (1980) 29, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 549–66
Bederman, D. J., The spirit of international law (Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 2002)
Benedick, R. E., ‘The Montreal ozone treaty: implications for global warming’ (1990) 5, American University Journal of International Law and Policy, 227–33
Benevisti, E. and Downs, G. W., ‘The empire’s new clothes: political economy and the fragmentation of international law’ (2007) 60, Stanford Law Review, 595–632
Berner, U. and Streif, H., Klimafakten: Der Rückblick – ein Schlüssel für die Zukunft, 4th edn (Stuttgart: Schweizerbart, 2004)
Besson, S., ‘Theorizing the sources of international law’, in S. Besson and J. Tasioulas (eds.), The philosophy of international law (Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 163–203
Beyerlin, U., Umweltvölkerrecht (Munich: Beck, 2000)
Beyerlin, U., ‘Different types of norms in international environmental law: policies, principles and rules’, in D. Bodansky, J. Brunnée and E. Hey (eds.), The Oxford handbook of international environmental law (Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 425–48
Beyerlin, U. and Marauhn, T., International environmental law (Oxford, Portland, OR: Hart, Beck, 2011)
Beyerlin, U., Stoll, P.-T. and Wolfrum, R. (eds.), Ensuring compliance with multilateral environmental agreements: a dialogue between practitioners and academia, Studies on the law of treaties (Leiden, Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff, 2006)
Biermann, F., Davies, O. and van der Grijp, N., ‘Environmental policy integration and the architecture of global environmental governance’ (2009) 9, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 351–69
Birnie, P. W., ‘Introduction’, in R. R. Churchill and D. Freestone (eds.), International law and climate change: prospects for progress in the legal order (London, Dordrecht: Graham & Trotman, Martinus Nijhoff, 1991), pp. 1–5
Birnie, P. W., Boyle, A. E. and Redgwell, C., International law and the environment, 3rd edn (Oxford University Press, 2009)
Bleckmann, A., Allgemeine Staats- und Völkerrechtslehre: Vom Kompetenz- zum Kooperationsvölkerrecht (Cologne, Berlin: Heymann, 1995)
Bodansky, D., ‘The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: a commentary’ (1993) 18, Yale Journal of International Law, 451–558
Bodansky, D., ‘The legitimacy of international governance: a coming challenge for international environmental law?’ (1999) 93, American Journal of International Law, 596–624
Bodansky, D., ‘Rules versus standards in international environmental law’, in American Society of International Law (ed.), Proceedings of the ninety-eighth annual meeting (Washington, DC, 2004), pp. 275–80
Bodansky, D., ‘The concept of legitimacy in international law’, in R. Wolfrum (ed.), Legitimacy in international law, Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht (Berlin: Springer, 2008), vol. 194, pp. 309–17
Bodansky, D., ‘Is there an international environmental constitution?’ (2009) 16, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 565–84
Bodansky, D., Legal form of a new climate agreement: avenues and options (Pew Center on Global Climate Change, 2009)
Bodansky, D., The art and craft of international environmental law (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010)
Bodansky, D., ‘The Copenhagen Climate Change Conference: a postmortem’ (2010) 104, American Journal of International Law, 230–40
Bodansky, D., Brunnée, J. and Hey, E., ‘International environmental law: mapping the field’, in D. Bodansky, J. Brunnée and E. Hey (eds.), The Oxford handbook of international environmental law (Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 1–25
Bodansky, D. and Diringer, E., The evolution of multilateral regimes: Implications for climate change (Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, 2010)
Böhringer, C. and Vogt, C., ‘Economic and environmental impacts of the Kyoto Protocol’ (2003) 36, Canadian Journal of Economics, 475–96
Bos, M., ‘The recognized manifestations of international law: a new theory of “sources”’ (1977) 20, German Yearbook of International Law, 9–76
Bos, M., ‘Will and order in the nation-state system: observations on positivism and positive international law’, in R. J. MacDonald and D. M. Johnston (eds.), The structure and process of international law: essays in legal philosophy doctrine and theory, Developments in international law, 2nd edn (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1983), pp. 51–78
Bos, M., A methodology of international law (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1984)
Bothe, M., ‘Die Bedeutung der Rechtsvergleichung in der Praxis internationaler Gerichte’ (1976) 36, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 280–99
Bothe, M., ‘Legal and non-legal norms – a meaningful distinction in international relations?’ (1980) 11, Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, 65–95
Bothe, M., ‘The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change – an unprecedented multilevel regulatory challenge’ (2003) 63, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 239–54
Boyle, A. E., ‘Saving the world: implementation and enforcement of international environmental law through international institutions’ (1991) 3, Journal of Environmental Law, 229–45
Boyle, A. E., ‘Some reflections on the relationship of treaties and soft law’, in V. Gowlland-Debbas (ed.), Multilateral treaty-making: the current status of challenges to and reforms needed in international legislative process (The Hague: Kluwer Academic, 2000), pp. 25–38
Boyle, A. E. and Chinkin, C. M., The making of international law (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007)
Breidenich, C., Magraw, D., Rowley, A. and Rubin, J. W., ‘The Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change’ (1998) 92, American Journal of International Law, 315–31
Brölmann, C., The institutional veil in public international law: international organisations and the law of treaties, Hart monographs in transnational and international law (Oxford: Hart, 2007)
Brower, C. N., ‘The international treaty-making process: paradise lost, or humpty dumpty?’, in V. Gowlland-Debbas (ed.), Multilateral treaty-making: the current status of challenges to and reforms needed in international legislative process (The Hague: Kluwer Academic, 2000), pp. 75–80
Brownlie, I., Principles of public international law, 7th edn (Oxford University Press, 2008)
Brugger, W., ‘Legal interpretation, schools of jurisprudence, and anthropology: some remarks from a German point of view’ (1994) 42, American Journal of Comparative Law, 395–421
Brunnée, J., Acid rain and ozone layer depletion: international law and regulation (Dobbs Ferry, NY: Transnational Publishers, 1988)
Brunnée, J., ‘A fine balance: facilitation and enforcement in the design of a compliance regime for the Kyoto Protocol’ (2000) 13, Tulane Environmental Law Journal, 223–70
Brunnée, J., ‘COPing with consent: law-making under multilateral environmental agreements’ (2002) 15, Leiden Journal of International Law, 1–52
Brunnée, J., ‘The Kyoto Protocol: testing ground for compliance theories?’ (2003) 63, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 255–80
Brunnée, J., ‘Reweaving the fabric of international law?: Patterns of consent in environmental framework agreements’, in R. Wolfrum (ed.), Developments of international law in treaty making, Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht (Berlin: Springer, 2005), vol. 177, pp. 101–26
Brunnée, J., ‘Common areas, common heritage, and common concern’, in D. Bodansky, J. Brunnée and E. Hey (eds.), The Oxford handbook of international environmental law (Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 550–73
Brunnée, J. and Toope, S., ‘International law and constructivism: elements of an interactional theory of international law’ (2000) 39, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 19–74
Brunnée, J. and Toope, S., Legitimacy and legality in international law: an interactional account, Cambridge studies in international and comparative law (Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010), vol. 67
Brunnée, J. and Toope, S., ‘Constructivism and international law’, in J. L. Dunoff and M. A. Pollack (eds.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on international law and international relations – the state of the art (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 119–45
Capps, P., ‘Natural law and the law of nations’, in A. Orakhelashvili (ed.), Research handbook on the theory and history of international law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2011), pp. 61–92
Caron, D. D., ‘Protection of the stratospheric ozone layer and the structure of international environmental lawmaking’ (1991) 14, Hastings International and Comparative Law Review, 755–80
Carruthers, C. (ed.), Multilateral environmental agreement: Negotiator’s Handbook, 2nd edn (University of Joensuu, Department of Law, 2007)
Chambers, W. B., ‘Towards an improved understanding of legal effectiveness of international environmental treaties’ (2004) 16, Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, 501–32
Chambers, W. B., Interlinkages and the effectiveness of multilateral environmental agreements (Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 2008)
Chandani, A., ‘Expectations, reality, and future: a negotiator’s reflections on COP 15’ (2010) 1, Climate Law, 207–25
Charney, J., ‘The impact on the international legal system of the growth of international courts and tribunals’ (1999) 31, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 697–708
Chase, O. G., ‘American “exceptionalism” and comparative procedure’ (2002) 50, American Journal of Comparative Law, 277–301
Chayes, A. and Handler Chayes, A., The new sovereignty: compliance with international regulatory agreements (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995)
Chayes, A. and Handler Chayes, A., ‘On compliance’, in B. A. Simmons and R. H. Steinberg (eds.), International law and international relations (Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 65–91
Cheng, B., ‘United Nations resolutions on outer space: “instant” international customary law?’ (1965) 5, Indian Journal of International Law, 23–48
Chinkin, C. M., ‘The challenge of soft law: development and change in international law’ (1989) 38, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 850–66
Churchill, R. R. and Ulfstein, G., ‘Autonomous institutional arrangements in multilateral environmental agreements: a little-noticed phenomenon in international environmental law’ (2000) 94, American Journal of International Law, 623–59
Clémençon, R., ‘The Bali Road Map: a first step on the difficult journey to a post-Kyoto Protocol agreement’ (2008) 17, The Journal of Environment & Development, 70–94
Crossen, T., ‘The Kyoto Protocol compliance regime: origins, outcomes and the amendment dilemma’ (2004) 12, Resource Management Journal, 1–6
Cumberlege, S., ‘Multilateral environmental regimes: from Montreal to Kyoto. A theoretical approach to an improved climate change regime’ (2009) 37, Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, 303–29
D’Amato, A., ‘On consensus’ (1970) 8, Canadian Yearbook of International Law, 104–22
D’Amato, A., ‘What “counts” as law?’, in N. G. Onuf (ed.), Law-making in the global community (Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 1982), pp. 83–107
D’Amato, A., ‘Is international law really “law”?’ (1985) 79, Northwestern University Law Review, 1293–314
Danish, K. W., ‘An overview of the international regime addressing climate change’ (2007) 7, Sustainable Development Law & Policy, 10–15, 76–77
Danish, K. W., ‘International relations theory’, in D. Bodansky, J. Brunnée and E. Hey (eds.), The Oxford handbook of international environmental law (Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 205–30
De Sadeleer, N., Environmental principles: from political slogans to legal rules (Oxford University Press, 2005)
De Vattel, E., Le droit des gens ou principes de la loi naturelle appliquée a la conduite et aux affaires des Nations et des Souverains (1758)
Delbrück, J., Wolfrum, R. and Dahm, G., Völkerrecht, 2nd edn, 3 vols. (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1989), vol. 1
Depledge, J., Tracing the origins of the Kyoto Protocol: an article-by-article textual history (UN Doc. UNFCCC/TP/2000/2, 2000)
Depledge, J., ‘Crafting the Copenhagen consensus: some reflections’ (2008) 17, Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 154–65
Depledge, J., ‘The road less travelled: difficulties in moving between annexes in the climate change regime’ (2009) 9, Climate Policy, 273–87
Desai, B., Multilateral environmental agreements: legal status of the secretariats (Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010)
Dessai, S. and Schipper, E. L., ‘The Marrakech Accords to the Kyoto Protocol: analysis and future prospects’ (2003) 13, Global Environmental Change, 149–53
de Yturriaga, J. A., ‘Regional conventions on the protection of the marine environment’ (1979) 162, Recueil des Cours, 319–449
Diehl, P. F., Ku, C. and Zamora, D., ‘The dynamics of international law: the interaction of normative and operating systems’, in B. A. Simmons and R. H. Steinberg (eds.), International law and international relations (Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 426–53
Dixit, R. K., ‘Amendment or modification of treaties’ (1970) 10, Indian Journal of International Law, 37–50
Doelle, M., ‘Linking the Kyoto Protocol and other multilateral environmental agreements: from fragmentation to integration’ (2004) 14, Journal of Environmental Law and Practice, 75–104
Doelle, M., ‘The cat came back, or the nine lives of the Kyoto Protocol’ (2006) 16, Journal of Environmental Law and Practice, 261–88
Doelle, M., ‘The legacy of the climate talks in Copenhagen: hopenhagen or brokenhagen?’ (2010) 4, Carbon and Climate Law Review, 86–100
Dolzer, R., ‘Die internationale Konvention zum Schutz des Klimas und das allgemeine Völkerrecht’, in U. Beyerlin and R. Bernhardt (eds.), Recht zwischen Umbruch und Bewahrung: Völkerrecht, Europarecht, Staatsrecht. Festschrift für Rudolf Bernhardt, Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht (Berlin: Springer, 1995), vol. 120, pp. 957–73
Duffield, J., ‘What are international institutions?’ (2007) 9, International Studies Review, 1–22
Dunoff, J. L. and Pollack, M. A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on international law and international relations – the state of the art (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013)
Dupuy, P.-M., ‘Soft law and the international law of the environment’ (1991) 12, Michigan Journal of International Law, 420–35
Dupuy, P.-M., ‘The danger of fragmentation or unification of the international legal system and the International Court of Justice’ (1999) 31, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 791–807
Dupuy, P.-M., ‘Formation of customary international law and general principles’, in D. Bodansky, J. Brunnée and E. Hey (eds.), The Oxford handbook of international environmental law (Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 449–66
Dworkin, R., Taking rights seriously (London: Duckworth, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977)
Dworkin, R., ‘A new philosophy for international law’ (2013) 41, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 2–30
Earth Negotiations Bulletin,
Summary of the Doha climate change conference, 26 November–8 December 2012, Summary of the Doha climate change conference,
www.iisd.ca/download/pdf/enb12567e.pdf (3 February
2013)
Eccleston, P., ‘UN announces green “New Deal” plan to rescue world economies’, The Daily Telegraph, 22 October 2008
Eilperin, J., ‘Hope and funding for saving forests around the world’, Washington Post, 19 December 2009
Einstein, A. and Infeld, L., Die Evolution der Physik (Hamburg: Anaconda, 1956)
Elias, T. O., ‘Modern sources of international law’, in W. Friedmann, L. Henkin, O. Lissitzyn and P. C. Jessup (eds.), Transnational law in a changing society: essays in honor of Philip C. Jessup (New York: Columbia University Press, 1972), pp. 34–69
Engelmann, A., A history of continental civil procedure: translated and edited by Robert Wyness Millar (London: John Murray, 1928)
Epiney, A. and Scheyli, M., Strukturprinzipien des Umweltvölkerrechts, Forum Umweltrecht (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1998), vol. 29
Esser, J., Vorverständnis und Methodenwahl in der Rechtsfindung, 2nd edn (Frankfurt am Main: Athenäum Verlag, 1972)
Eyckmans, J. and Finus, M., ‘Measures to enhance the success of global climate treaties’ (2007) 7, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 73–97
Falk, R. A., ‘Charybdis responds: a note on treaty interpretation’ (1969) 63, American Journal of International Law, 510–14
Fastenrath, U., Lücken im Völkerrecht: Zu Rechtscharakter, Quellen, Systemzusammenhang, Methodenlehre und Funktionen des Völkerrechts, Schriften zum Völkerrecht (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1991), vol. 93
Fastenrath, U., ‘Relative normativity in international law’ (1993) 4, European Journal of International Law, 305–40
Fernández de Casadevante y Romani, C., Sovereignty and interpretation of international norms (Berlin: Springer, 2007)
Fiedler, W., ‘Zur Verbindlichkeit einseitiger Versprechen im Völkerrecht’ (1976) 19, German Yearbook of International Law, 35–72
Finus, M. and Tjotta, S., ‘The Oslo Protocol on sulfur reduction: the great leap forward?’ (2003) 87, Journal of Public Economics, 2031–48
Fitzmaurice, G., ‘Do treaties need ratification?’ (1934) 15, British Year Book of International Law, 113–37
Fitzmaurice, G., ‘The general principles of international law considered from the standpoint of the rule of law’ (1957) 92, Recueil des Cours, 1–227
Fitzmaurice, M., ‘The Kyoto Protocol compliance regime and treaty law’ (2004) 8, Singapore Year Book of International Law, 23–40
Fitzmaurice, M., ‘Consent to be bound: anything new under the sun?’ (2005) 74, Nordic Journal of International Law, 483–507
Fitzmaurice, M. and Elias, O., Contemporary issues of the law of treaties (Utrecht: Eleven, 2004)
Fitzmaurice, M. and Redgwell, C., ‘Environmental non-compliance procedures and international law’ (2000) 31, Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, 35–65
Franck, T. M., ‘Intervention against illegitimate regimes’, in L. Fisler Damrosch and D. Scheffer (eds.), Law and force in the new international order (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1991), pp. 159–76
Franck, T. M., Fairness in international law and institutions (Oxford University Press, 1995)
Freestone, D., ‘The road from Rio: international environmental law after the earth summit’ (1994) 6, Journal of Environmental Law, 193–218
Frischmann, B., ‘A dynamic institutional theory of international law’ (2003) 51, Buffalo Law Review, 679–809
Fry, I., ‘More twists, turns and stumbles in the jungle: a further exploration of land use, land-use change and forestry decisions within the Kyoto Protocol’ (2007) 16, Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 341–55
Fry, I., ‘Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation: opportunities and pitfalls in developing a new legal regime’ (2008) 17, Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 166–82
Fuller, L., The morality of law, rev. edn (New Haven, CT, London: Yale University Press, 1974)
Gardiner, R. K., Treaty interpretation, The Oxford International Law Library (Oxford University Press, 2008)
Gehring, T., ‘International environmental regimes: dynamic sectoral legal systems’ (1991) 1, Yearbook of International Environmental Law, 35–56
Gehring, T., Dynamic international regimes: institutions for international environmental governance, Studies of the Environmental Law Network International (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1994)
Gehring, T., ‘Treaty-making and treaty evolution’, in D. Bodansky, J. Brunnée and E. Hey (eds.), The Oxford handbook of international environmental law (Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 467–97
Gehring, T. and Oberthür, S., ‘Internationale Regime als Steuerungsinstrumente der Umweltpolitik’, in T. Gehring and S. Oberthür (eds.), Internationale Umweltregime: Umweltschutz durch Verhandlungen und Verträge, 1st edn (Opladen: Leske & Budrich, 1997), pp. 9–25
Gehring, T. and Oberthür, S., (eds.), Internationale Umweltregime: Umweltschutz durch Verhandlungen und Verträge, 1st edn (Opladen: Leske & Budrich, 1997)
Geiger, R., ‘Die zweite Krise der völkerrechtlichen Rechtsquellenlehre’ (1979) 30, Österreichische Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht, 215–34
Geiger, R., Grundgesetz und Völkerrecht, 5th edn (Munich: C.H. Beck, 2010)
Georgiev, D., ‘Politics or rule of law: deconstruction and legitimacy in international law’ (1993) 4, European Journal of International Law, 1–14
Gihl, T., ‘The legal character of sources of international law’ (1957) 1, Scandinavian Studies in Law, 53–92
Gillespie, A., ‘Sinks and the climate change regime: the state of play’ (2003) 13, Duke Environmental Law and Policy Forum, 279–301
Goldsmith, J. and Posner, E. A., ‘A theory of customary international law’ (1999) 66, The University of Chicago Law Review, 1113–77
Goldsmith, J. and Vermeule, A., ‘Empirical methodology and legal scholarship’ (2002) 69, The University of Chicago Law Review, 153–67
Grubb, M., ‘Cancun: the art of the possible’ (2011) 11, Climate Policy, 847–50
Grubb, M., Vrolijk, C. and Brack, D., The Kyoto Protocol: a guide and assessment (London: Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1999)
Gruchalla-Wesierski, T., ‘A framework for understanding “soft law”’ (1984) 30, McGill Law Journal, 37–88
Gupta, J., The climate change convention and developing countries: from conflict to consensus?, Environment & Policy (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1997), vol. 8
Haas, P. M., ‘Epistemic communities’, in D. Bodansky, J. Brunnée and E. Hey (eds.), The Oxford handbook of international environmental law (Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 791–806
Habermas, J., Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, 3rd edn, 2 vols. (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1985)
Hafner, G., Risks ensuing from fragmentation of international law: annex to the report of the International Law Commission on the work of its fifty-second session (2000)
Haites, E. and Yamin, F., ‘Overview of the Kyoto Mechanisms’ (2004) 5, International Review for Environmental Strategies, 199–216
Hall, S., ‘The persistent spectre: natural law, international order and the limits of legal positivism’ (2001) 12, European Journal of International Law, 269–307
Halvorssen, A. M. and Hovi, J., ‘The nature, origin and impact of legally binding consequences: the case of the climate regime’ (2006) 6, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 157–71
Hampson, F. O. and Hart, M., Multilateral negotiations: lessons from arms control, trade, and the environment (Baltimore. MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995)
Hardin, G., ‘The tragedy of the commons’ (1968) 162, Science, 1243–8
Hart, H. L. A., The concept of law, Clarendon law series, 2nd edn (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997)
Hasselmann, K., ‘Globale Erwärmung und optimierte Klimaschutzstrategien’, in H.-J. Koch and J. Caspar (eds.), Klimaschutz im Recht, Forum Umweltrecht (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1997), vol. 20, pp. 9–27
Heintschel von Heinegg, W., ‘Die völkerrechtlichen Verträge als Hauptrechtsquelle des Völkerrechts’, in K. Ipsen (ed.), Völkerrecht, 5th edn (Munich: Beck, 2004), pp. 112–209
Heintschel von Heinegg, W., ‘Die weiteren Quellen des Völkerrechts’, in K. Ipsen (ed.), Völkerrecht, 5th edn (Munich: Beck, 2004), pp. 210–56
Helm, C. and Sprinz, D., ‘Measuring the effectiveness of international environmental regimes’ (2000) 44, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 630–52
Hey, E., Teaching international law: state-consent as consent to a process of normative development and ensuing problems (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2003)
Hey, E., ‘International institutions’, in D. Bodansky, J. Brunnée and E. Hey (eds.), The Oxford handbook of international environmental law (Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 749–69
Hierlmeier, J., ‘UNEP: Retrospect and prospect – options for reforming the global environmental governance regime’ (2002) 14, Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, 767–805
Hill, T., ‘UN Climate Change conference in Durban: outcomes and future of the Kyoto Protocol’ (2011) 7, Macquarie Journal of International and Comparative Environmental Law, 92–7
Hisschemöller, M. and Gupta, J., ‘Problem-solving through international environmental agreements: the issue of regime effectiveness’ (1999) 20, International Political Science Review, 151–73
Holtwisch, C., Das Nichteinhaltungsverfahren des Kyoto-Protokolls: Entstehung – Gestalt – Wirkung (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2006)
Honeyball, S. and Walter, J., Integrity, community and interpretation (Aldershot, Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 1998)
Honkonen, T., ‘The principle of common but differentiated responsibility in post-2012 climate negotiations’ (2009) 18, Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 257–67.
Hummer, W., ‘“Ordinary” versus “special” meaning: comparison of the approach of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and the Yale-school findings’ (1975/76) 26, Österreichische Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht, 87–163
Hyde, C. C., ‘The interpretation of treaties by the Permanent Court of International Justice’ (1930) 24, American Journal of International Law, 1–19
International Law Commission, Fragmentation of international law: difficulties arising from the diversification and expansion of international law. Report of the study group of the International Law Commission (Geneva, 2006)
Ipsen, K., ‘Regelungsbereich, Geschichte und Funktionen des Völkerrechts’, in K. Ipsen (ed.), Völkerrecht, 5th edn (Munich: Beck, 2004), pp. 1–54
Ivanova, M., ‘Designing the United Nations Environment Programme: a story of compromise and confrontation’ (2007) 2, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 337–61
Ivanova, M., ‘Moving forward by looking back: learning from UNEP’s history’, in L. Swart and E. Perry (eds.), Global environmental governance: perspectives on the current debate (New York: Center for UN Reform Education, 2007), pp. 26–47
Jacobson, H. K. and Brown Weiss, E., ‘A framework for analysis’, in E. Brown Weiss and H. K. Jacobson (eds.), Engaging countries: strengthening compliance with international environmental accords (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998), pp. 1–18
Jacobson, H. K. and Brown Weiss, E., ‘Assessing the record and designing strategies to engage countries’, in E. Brown Weiss and H. K. Jacobson (eds.), Engaging countries: strengthening compliance with international environmental accords (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998), pp. 511–54
Jacoby, H. D. and Reiner, D. M., ‘Getting climate policy on track after The Hague’ (2001) 77, International Affairs, 297–312
Jellinek, G., Allgemeine Staatslehre, 3rd edn, 7th reprint (Bad Homburg: Hermann Gentner Verlag, 1960)
Johnston, D. M., ‘Systemic environmental damage: the challenge to international law and organization’ (1985) 12, Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce, 255–82
Kammerhofer, J., ‘Uncertainty in the formal sources of international law: customary international law and some of its problems’ (2004) 15, European Journal of International Law, 523–53
Kammerhofer, J., ‘Hans Kelsen’s place in international legal theory’, in A. Orakhelashvili (ed.), Research handbook on the theory and history of international law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2011), pp. 143–67
Kaufmann, A., ‘Problemgeschichte der Rechtsphilosophie’, in A. Kaufmann, W. Hassemer and U. Neumann (eds.), Einführung in Rechtsphilosophie und Rechtstheorie der Gegenwart, UTB Rechtswissenschaft, Philosophie, 7th edn (Heidelberg: C. F. Müller Verlag, 2004), vol. 593, pp. 26–147
Kearney, R. D. and Dalton, R. E., ‘The treaty on treaties’ (1970) 64, American Journal of International Law, 495–561
Kelsen, H., Allgemeine Staatslehre (Berlin: Springer, 1925)
Kelsen, H., Reine Rechtslehre, 2nd edn (Vienna: Springer, 1960)
Kelsen, H., Principles of International Law: revised and edited by Robert W. Tucker, 2nd edn (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1967)
Keohane, R. O., After hegemony: cooperation and discord in the world political economy (Princeton University Press, 1984)
Keohane, R. O., ‘International Institutions: two approaches’ (1988) 32, International Studies Quarterly, 379–96
Keohane, R. O., ‘International relations and international law: two optics’ (1997) 38, Harvard Journal of International Law, 487–502
Keohane, R. O., ‘The demand for international regimes’, in B. A. Simmons and R. H. Steinberg (eds.), International law and international relations (Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 18–39
Keohane, R. O. and Nye, J. S., Power and interdependence, 3rd edn (New York: Longman, 2001)
Kingsbury, B., ‘The concept of compliance as a function of competing conceptions of international law’ (1998) 19, Michigan Journal of International Law, 345–72
Kingsbury, B., ‘Is the proliferation of international courts and tribunals a systemic problem?’ (1999) 31, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 679–96
Kingsbury, B., ‘Legal positivism as normative politics: international society, balance of power and Lassa Oppenheim’s Positive International law’ (2002) 13, European Journal of International Law, 401–36
Kiss, A. and Shelton, D., International environmental law, 3rd edn (Ardsley, NY: Transnational Publishers, 2003)
Kjellén, B., Friends of the chair, or the chair’s (true) friends?: The art of negotiation in the Rio process and climate negotiations (Oxford: European Capacity Building Initiative, 2010)
Klabbers, J., ‘The redundancy of soft law’ (1996) 65, Nordic Journal of International Law, 167–82
Klabbers, J., An introduction to international institutional law (Cambridge University Press, 2002)
Klabbers, J., ‘Compliance procedures’, in D. Bodansky, J. Brunnée and E. Hey (eds.), The Oxford handbook of international environmental law (Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 995–1009
Klabbers, J., International law (Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013)
Koh, H. H., ‘Why do nations obey international law?’ (1997) 106, The Yale Law Journal, 2599–659
Koremenos, B., ‘Institutionalism and international law’, in J. L. Dunoff and M. A. Pollack (eds.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on international law and international relations – the state of the art (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 59–82
Koskenniemi, M., ‘Breach of treaty or non-compliance?: Reflections on the enforcement of the Montreal Protocol’ (1992) 3, Yearbook of International Environmental Law, 123–62
Koskenniemi, M. and Leino, P., ‘Fragmentation of international law? Postmodern anxieties’ (2002) 15, Leiden Journal of International Law, 553–79
Krasner, S., ‘Structural causes and regime consequences: regimes as intervening variables’ (1982) 36, International Organization, 185–205
Kratochwil, F. and Ruggie, J. G., ‘International organization: a state of the art or an art of the state’ (1986) 40, International Organization, 753–75
Kulovesi, K., ‘A new chapter in the UN climate change negotiations?: First steps under the Durban Platform for enhanced action’ (2012) 3, Climate Law, 181–9
Kulovesi, K. and Gutiérrez, M., ‘Climate change negotiations update: process and prospects for a Copenhagen agreed outcome in December 2009’ (2009) 18, Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 229–43
Kumm, M., ‘The legitimacy of international law: a constitutionalist framework of analysis’ (2004) 15, European Journal of International Law, 907–31
Kunz, J. L., ‘The Danube regime and the Belgrade conference’ (1949) 43, American Journal of International Law, 104–13
Kuokkanen, T., International law and the environment: variations on a theme, The Erik Castrén Institute monographs on international law and human rights (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2002), vol. 4
Lang, W., ‘Die Verrechtlichung des internationalen Umweltschutzes: Vom “soft law” zum “hard law”’ (1984) 22, Archiv des Völkerrechts, 283–305
Lang, W., ‘Diplomacy and international environmental law-making: some observations’ (1992) 3, Yearbook of International Environmental Law, 108–22
Lang, W., ‘Auf der Suche nach einem wirksamen Klima-Regime’ (1993) 31, Archiv des Völkerrechts, 13–29
Lang, W., ‘Regimes and organizations in the labyrinth of international institutions’, in K. Ginther, G. Hafner, W. Lang, H. Neuhold and L. Sucharipa-Behrmann (eds.), Völkerrecht zwischen normativem Anspruch und politischer Realität: Festschrift für Karl Zemanek zum 65. Geburtstag (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1994), pp. 275–89
Lang, W., ‘Compliance control in international environmental law: institutional necessities’ (1996) 56, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 685–95
Lange, A. and Vogt, C., ‘Cooperation in international environmental negotiations due to a preference for equity’ (2003) 87, Journal of Public Economics, 2049–67
Larsen, P. B., ‘Between Scylla and Charybdis in treaty interpretation’ (1969) 63, American Journal of International Law, 108–10
Lauterpacht, H., International law, being the collected papers of Hersch Lauterpacht. Systematically arranged and edited by E. Lauterpacht: Volume I, The general works (Cambridge University Press, 1970)
Leathley, C., ‘An institutional hierarchy to combat the fragmentation of international law: has the ILC missed an opportunity?’ (2007) 40, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 259–306
Leebron, D. W., ‘Linkages’ (2002) 96, American Journal of International Law, 5–27
Lefeber, R., ‘Creative legal engineering’ (2000) 13, Leiden Journal of International Law, 1–9
Lefeber, R., ‘From The Hague to Bonn to Marrakesh and beyond: a negotiating history of the compliance system under the Kyoto Protocol’ (2002), Hague Yearbook of International Law, 25–54
Lefeber, R., ‘The practice of the Compliance Committee under the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (2006–2007)’, in T. Treves (ed.), Non-compliance procedures and mechanisms and the effectiveness of international environmental agreements (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2009), pp. 303–17
Lefkowitz, D., ‘The sources of international law: some philosophical reflections’, in S. Besson and J. Tasioulas (eds.), The philosophy of international law (Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 187–203
Lev, A., ‘The transformation of international law in the 19th century’, in A. Orakhelashvili (ed.), Research handbook on the theory and history of international law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2011), pp. 111–42
Levy, M. A., Young, O. R. and Zürn, M., ‘The study of international regimes’ (1993) 1, European Journal of International Relations, 267–330
Lim, C. and Elias, O., ‘The role of treaties in the contemporary international legal order’ (1997) 66, Nordic Journal of International Law, 1–21
Lindroos, A. and Mehling, M., ‘Dispelling the chimera of “self-contained regimes”’ international law and the WTO’ (2006) 16, European Journal of International Law, 857–77
Lipschutz, R. D., ‘Bargaining among nations: culture, history, and perceptions in regime formation’ (1991) 15, Evaluation Review, 46–74
Lipson, C., ‘Why are some international agreements informal?’, in B. A. Simmons and R. H. Steinberg (eds.), International law and international relations (Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 293–330
Louka, E., International environmental law: fairness, effectiveness, and world order (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006)
Luhmann, N., Rechtssoziologie, 4th edn (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaft, 2008)
Lyster, S., International wildlife law: an analysis of international treaties concerned with the conservation of wildlife (Cambridge: Grotius Publications, 1985)
Mace, M. J., ‘The Bali Road Map: can it deliver an equitable post-2012 climate agreement for small island states?’ (2008) 17, Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 183–95
Mace, M. J., ‘United Nations Climate Change Conference – Poznan, Poland’ (2009) 3, International Energy Law Review, 72–4
Maljean-Dubois, S. and Wemaëre, M., ‘After Durban, what legal form for the future international climate regime?’ (2012) 3, Carbon and Climate Law Review, 187–96
Manguiat, M. S., ‘Compliance under the Kyoto Protocol and its implications for the Asian region’, in K. L. Koh, L. H. Lye and J. Lin (eds.), Crucial issues in climate change and the Kyoto Protocol: Asia and the world (Singapore: World Scientific, 2010), pp. 407–43
Marauhn, T., ‘Towards a procedural law of compliance control in international environmental relations’ (1996) 56, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 696–731
Martin, L. L., ‘Against compliance’, in J. L. Dunoff and M. A. Pollack (eds.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on international law and international relations – the state of the art (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013)
Massai, L., ‘The long way to the Copenhagen Accord: climate change negotiations in 2009’ (2010) 19, Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 104–21
McDougal, M., ‘International law: power and policy. A contemporary conception’ (1953) 82, Recueil des Cours, 137–259
McDougal, M., ‘The hydrogen bomb tests and the international law of the sea’ (1955) 49, American Journal of International Law, 356–61
McDougal, M., ‘The International Law Commission’s draft articles upon interpretation: textuality redivivus’ (1967) 61, American Journal of International Law, 992–1000
McDougal, M. and Lasswell, H. D., ‘Criteria for a theory about law’ (1971) 44 Southern California Law Review, 362–94
McDougal, M. and Reisman, W. M., ‘The changing structure of international law’ (1965) 65 Columbia Law Review, 810–35
McDougal, M. and Reisman, W. M., International law in contemporary perspective, University casebook series (New York: Foundation Press, 1981)
McNair, A. D., The law of treaties (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961)
Meinshausen, M., Meinshausen, N., Hare, W., Raper, S. C. B., Frieler, K. and Knutti, R., ‘Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2°C’ (2009) 458, Nature, 1158–63
Milinski, M., Sommerfeld, R. D., Krambeck, H.-J., Reed, F. A. and Marotzke, J., ‘The collective-risk social dilemma and the prevention of simulated dangerous climate change’ (2008) 105, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2291–4
Mitchell, R. B., ‘Sources of transparency: information systems in international regimes’ (1998) 42, International Studies Quarterly, 109–30
Mitchell, R. B., ‘International environmental agreements: a survey of their features, formation, and effects’ (2003) 28, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 429–61
Mitchell, R. B., ‘Problem structure, institutional design, and the relative effectiveness of international environmental agreements’ (2006) 6, Global Environmental Politics, 72–89
Mitchell, R. B., ‘Compliance theory: compliance, effectiveness, and behaviour change in international environmental law’, in D. Bodansky, J. Brunnée and E. Hey (eds.), The Oxford handbook of international environmental law (Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 893–921
Mitchell, R. B., ‘Evaluating the performance of environmental institutions: what to evaluate and how to evaluate it?’, in O. R. Young, L. A. King and H. Schroeder (eds.), Institutions and environmental change: principal findings, applications and research frontiers (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2008), pp. 79–114
Moncel, R., ‘Unconstructive ambiguity in the Durban Climate deal of COP 17/CMP 7’ (2012) 12, Sustainable Development Law & Policy, 6–11, 52–6
Morgenstern, L., ‘One, two or one and a half protocols?: An assessment of suggested options for the legal form of the post-2012 climate regime’ (2009) 3, Carbon and Climate Law Review, 235–47
Mosler, H., ‘Völkerrecht als Rechtsordnung’ (1976) 36, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 6–49
Mourthé de Alvim Andrade, T. C., The status of the enforcement branch as a quasi-judicial body: Research paper, on file with author (2008)
Mrema, E. M., ‘Implementation, compliance and enforcement of MEAs: UNEP’s role’, in M. Berglund (ed.), International environmental law-making and diplomacy review (University of Joensuu, 2005), pp. 125–35
Mrema, E. M., ‘Cross-cutting issues related to ensuring compliance with MEAs’, in U. Beyerlin, P.-T. Stoll and R. Wolfrum (eds.), Ensuring compliance with multilateral environmental agreements: a dialogue between practitioners and academia, Studies on the law of treaties (Leiden, Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff, 2006), pp. 201–27
Müller, B., Geldhof, W. and Ruys, T., Unilateral declarations: the missing legal link in the Bali Action Plan (Oxford: European Capacity Building Initiative, 2010)
Mullerson, R. A., ‘Sources of international law: new tendencies in Soviet thinking’ (1989) 83, American Journal of International Law, 494–512
Nanda, V. P. and Pring, G., International environmental law for the 21st century (Ardsley, NY: Transnational Publishers, 2003)
Nowrot, K., ‘Saving the international legal regime on climate change? The 2001 conferences of Bonn and Marrakesh’ (2001) 44, German Yearbook of International Law, 396–429
Oberthür, S., Politik im Treibhaus: Die Entstehung des internationalen Klimaschutzregimes (Berlin: Ed. Sigma, 1993)
Oberthür, S., Umweltschutz durch internationale Regime: Interessen, Verhandlungsprozesse, Wirkungen (Opladen: Leske & Budrich, 1997)
Oberthür, S. and Gehring, T., ‘Fazit: Internationale Umweltpolitik durch Verhandlungen und Verträge’, in T. Gehring and S. Oberthür (eds.), Internationale Umweltregime: Umweltschutz durch Verhandlungen und Verträge, 1st edn (Opladen: Leske & Budrich, 1997), pp. 219–35
Oberthür, S. and Gehring, T., ‘Reforming international environmental governance: an institutionalist critique of the proposal for a world environment organisation’ (2004) 4, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 359–81
Oberthür, S. and Lefeber, R., ‘Holding countries to account: the Kyoto Protocol’s compliance system revisited after four years of experience’ (2010) 1, Climate Law, 133–58
Oberthür, S. and Ott, H., ‘Stand und Perspektiven der internationalen Klimapolitik’ (1995) 4, Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft, 399–415
Oberthür, S. and Ott, H., The Kyoto Protocol: international climate policy for the 21st century (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1999)
Oellers-Frahm, K., ‘The evolving role of treaties in international law’, in R. A. Miller, R. M. Bratspies and J. E. Alvarez (eds.), Progress in international law, Developments in international law (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2008), vol. 60, pp. 173–96
Onuf, N. G., ‘Global law-making and legal thought’, in N. G. Onuf (ed.), Law-making in the global community (Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 1982), pp. 1–81
Onuf, N. G., ‘Do rules say what they do?: From ordinary language to international law’ (1985) 26, Harvard Journal of International Law, 385–410
Onuf, N. G., World of our making: rules and rule in social theory and international relations, Studies in international relations (Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1989)
Oppenheimer, M. and Petsonk, A., ‘Article 2 of the UNFCCC: historical origins, recent interpretations’ (2005) 73, Climatic Change, 195–226
Orakhelashvili, A., The interpretation of acts and rules in public international law, Oxford monographs in international law (Oxford University Press, 2008)
Orakhelashvili, A., ‘International law, international politics and ideology’, in A. Orakhelashvili (ed.), Research handbook on the theory and history of international law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2011), pp. 328–75
Orakhelashvili, A., ‘The origins of consensual positivism – Pufendorf, Wolff and Vattel’, in A. Orakhelashvili (ed.), Research handbook on the theory and history of international law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2011), pp. 93–110
Orakhelashvili, A., ‘The relevance of theory and history – the essence and origins of international law’, in A. Orakhelashvili (ed.), Research handbook on the theory and history of international law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2011), pp. 3–22
Ott, H., Umweltregime im Völkerrecht: Eine Untersuchung zu neuen Formen internationaler institutionalisierter Kooperation am Beispiel der Verträge zum Schutz der Ozonschicht und zur Kontrolle grenzüberschreitender Abfallverbringungen, Völkerrecht und Außenpolitik (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1998), vol. 53
Ott, H., ‘The Bonn agreement to the Kyoto Protocol: paving the way for ratification’ (2001) 1, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 469–76
Ott, H., Brouns, B., Sterk, W. and Wittneben, B., ‘It takes two to tango – climate policy at COP 10 in Buenos Aires and beyond’ (2005) 2, Journal for European Environmental and Planning Law, 84–91
Ott, H., Sterk, W. and Watanabe, R., ‘The Bali Roadmap: new horizons for global climate policy’ (2008) 8, Climate Policy, 91–5
Palmer, G., ‘New ways to make international environmental law’ (1992) 86, The American Journal of International Law, 259–83
Parry, C., The sources and evidences of international law (Manchester University Press, 1965)
Pindyck, R. S. and Rubinfeld, D. L., Mikroökonomie, 4th edn (Munich, Vienna: R. Oldenbourg Verlag, 1998)
Pontecorvo, C. M., ‘Interdependence between global environmental regimes: the Kyoto Protocol on climate change and forest protection’ (1999) 59, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 709–49
Postema, G. J., ‘Implicit law’ (1994) 13, Law and Philosophy, 361–87
Preuß, U. K., ‘Equality of states – its meaning in a constitutionalized global order’ (2008) 9, Chicago Journal of International Law, 17–49
Prost, M. and Clark, P. K., ‘Unity, diversity and the fragmentation of international law’ (2006) 5, Chinese Journal of International Law, 341–70
Rajamani, L., ‘The principle of common but differentiated responsibility and the balance of commitments under the climate regime’ (2000) 9, Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 120–31
Rajamani, L., Differential treatment in international environmental law (Oxford University Press, 2006)
Rajamani, L., ‘From Berlin to Bali and beyond: killing Kyoto Softly?’ (2008) 57, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 909–39
Rajamani, L., ‘Addressing the “post-Kyoto” stress disorder: reflections on the emerging legal architecture of the climate regime’ (2009) 58, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 803–34
Rajamani, L., ‘The increasing currency and relevance of rights-based perspectives in the international negotiations on climate change’ (2010) 22, Journal of Environmental Law, 391–429
Rajamani, L., ‘The making and unmaking of the Copenhagen Accord’ (2010) 59, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 824–43
Rajamani, L., ‘The Cancun Climate Agreements: reading the text, subtext and tea leaves’ (2011) 60, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 499–519
Rajamani, L., ‘The Durban Platform for Enhanced Action and the future of the climate regime’ (2012) 61, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 501–18
Ratner, S. and Slaughter, A.-M., ‘Appraising the methods of international law: a prospectus for readers’, in S. Ratner and A.-M. Slaughter (eds.), The methods of international law, Studies in transnational legal policy (Washington, DC: American Society of International Law, 2004), vol. 36, pp. 1–21
Raustiala, K., ‘Compliance and effectiveness in international regulatory cooperation’ (2000) 32, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 387–440
Raustiala, K. and Victor, D. G., ‘Conclusions’, in D. Victor, K. Raustiala, E. B. Skolnikoff and D. G. Victor (eds.), The implementation and effectiveness of international environmental commitments: theory and practice (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998), pp. 659–707
Raymond, G. A., ‘Problems and prospects in the study of international norms’ (1997) 41, Mershon International Studies Review, 205–45
Redgwell, C., ‘Multilateral environmental treaty-making’, in V. Gowlland-Debbas (ed.), Multilateral treaty-making: the current status of challenges to and reforms needed in the international legislative process, Nijhoff Law Specials (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 2000), vol. 47, pp. 89–107
Reisman, W. M., ‘The view from the New Haven School of international law’ (1992) 86, American Society of International Law Proceedings, 118–25
Richardson, E. L., ‘The climate regime: a broader view’, in R. E. Benedick, J. T. Mathews, J. K. Sebenius, A. Chayes, W. A. Nitze, P. S. Thacher, D. A. Lashof, E. L. Richardson and D. A. Wirth (eds.), Greenhouse warming: negotiating a global regime (Washington, DC: World Resources Institute, 1991), pp. 25–31
Riedel, E., ‘Standards and sources: farewell to the exclusivity of the sources triad in international law?’ (1991) 2, European Journal of International Law, 58–84
Ringius, L., ‘Differentiation, leaders, and fairness: negotiating climate commitments in the European Community’ (1999) 4, International Negotiation, 133–66
Ringius, L., Torvanger, A. and Underdal, A., ‘Burden sharing and fairness principles in international climate policy’ (2002) 2, International Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 1–22
Röben, V., ‘Institutional developments under modern international environmental agreements’, in A. von Bogandy and R. Wolfrum (eds.), Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1999), vol. 3, pp. 363–443
Roberts, A. E., ‘Traditional and modern approaches to customary international law: a reconciliation’ (2001) 95, American Journal of International Law, 757–91.
Roessler, F., ‘Law, de facto agreements and declaration of principle in international economic relations’ (1978) 21, German Yearbook of International Law, 27–59
Roessler, F., ‘The agreement establishing the World Trade Organization’, in J. H. J. Bourgeois, F. Berrod and E. Gippini Fournier (eds.), The Uruguay Round results: a European lawyer’s perspective, The Bruges conferences (Brussels: European Interuniversity Press, 1995), No. 8, pp. 67–85
Ross, A., Directives and norms (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1968)
Rowlands, I. H., ‘Atmosphere and outer space’, in D. Bodansky, J. Brunnée and E. Hey (eds.), The Oxford handbook of international environmental law (Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 315–36
Rubin, A. P., ‘The international legal effects of unilateral declarations’ (1977) 71, American Journal of International Law, 1–30
Rubin, E. L., ‘The practice and discourse of legal scholarship’ (1988) 68, Michigan Law Review, 1835–905
Ruggie, J. G., ‘International responses to technology: concepts and trends’ (1975) 29, International Organization, 557–83
Sabel, R., Procedure at international conferences: a study of the rules of procedure at the UN and at inter-governmental conferences, 2nd edn (Cambridge University Press, 2006)
Sach, K. and Reese, M., ‘Das Kyoto-Protokoll nach Bonn und Marrakesch’ (2002) 12, Zeitschrift für Umweltrecht, 65–72
Sagemüller, I., ‘Forest sinks under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol: opportunity or risk for biodiversity?’ (2006) 31, Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 189–242
Sand, P. H., ‘Institution-building to assist compliance with international environmental law: perspectives’ (1996) 56, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 774–95
Sand, P. H., Marine environment law in the United Nations Environment Programme: an emergent eco-regime (London, New York: Tycooly, 1988)
Sand, P. H. (ed.), The effectiveness of international environmental agreements: a survey of existing legal instruments (Cambridge: Grotius Publications, 1992)
Sands, P., ‘The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change’ (1992) 1, Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 270–7
Sands, P., ‘Turtles and torturers: the transformations of international law’ (2000) 33, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 527–59
Sands, P., Principles of international environmental law, 2nd edn (Cambridge University Press, 2003)
Sands, P., ‘Non-compliance and dispute settlement’, in U. Beyerlin, P.-T. Stoll and R. Wolfrum (eds.), Ensuring compliance with multilateral environmental agreements: a dialogue between practitioners and academia, Studies on the law of treaties (Leiden, Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2006), pp. 353–8
Santarius, T., Arens, C., Eichhorst, U., Kiyar, D., Mersmann, F., Ott, H., Rudolph, F., Sterk, W. and Watanabe, R., ‘Pit stop Poznan: an analysis of negotiations on the Bali Action Plan at the stopover to Copenhagen’ (2009) 6, Journal for European Environmental and Planning Law, 75–96
Schermers, H. G., ‘International organizations and the law of treaties’ (1999) 42, German Yearbook of International Law, 56–65
Schermers, H. G. and Blokker, N. M., International institutional law: unity within diversity, 4th edn, rev. (Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff, 2003)
Schiele, S., ‘Simplifying the procedures governing the accession of a Party to Annex B to the Kyoto Protocol’ (2008) 4, Carbon and Climate Law Review, 418–30
Schiele, S., ‘The European Union and quantified emission limitation and reduction commitments under the Kyoto Protocol’ (2010) 2, International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 191–203
Schipper, E. L. F. and Boyd, E., ‘UNFCCC COP 11 and COP/MOP 1: at last, some hope?’ (2006) 15, The Journal of Environment & Development, 75–90
Schlamadinger, B., ‘A synopsis of land use, land use change and forestry (LULUCF) under the Kyoto Protocol and Marrakech Accords’ (2007) 10, Environmental Science and Policy, 271–82
Schmans, M., Einstimmigkeitsprinzip, Mehrheitsprinzip und Konsensverfahren auf Vertragskonferenzen zur universellen völkerrechtlichen Rechtsetzung, Dissertation at the University of Göttingen (Göttingen, 1984)
Schmidt, L., REDD from an integrated perspective: considering overall climate change mitigation, biodiversity conservation and equity issues (Bonn: German Development Institute, 2009)
Schreuer, C., ‘New Haven approach und Völkerrecht’, in C. Schreuer (ed.), Autorität und internationale Ordnung: Aufsätze zum Völkerrecht (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1979), pp. 63–85
Searle, J., Expression and meaning: studies in the theory of speech acts (Cambridge University Press, 1979)
Shaw, M. N., International law, 6th edn (Cambridge University Press, 2008)
Silveira da Rocha, R., ‘Seeing the forest for the treaties: the evolving debates on forest and forestry activities under the clean development mechanism ten years after the Kyoto Protocol’ (2008) 31, Fordham International Law Journal, 634–83
Simma, B., Das Reziprozitätselement in der Entstehung des Völkergewohnheitsrechts (Munich, Salzburg: Fink, 1970)
Simma, B., ‘Consent: strains in the treaty system’, in R. J. MacDonald and D. M. Johnston (eds.), The structure and process of international law: essays in legal philosophy doctrine and theory, Developments in international law, 2nd edn (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1983), pp. 483–511
Simma, B., ‘Self-contained regimes’ (1985) 16, Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, 111–36
Simma, B., ‘From bilateralism to community interest in international law’ (1994) 250, Recueil des Cours, 217–384
Simma, B., The Charter of the United Nations: a commentary (Oxford University Press, 2002)
Simma, B., ‘Fragmentation in a positive light’ (2004) 25, Michigan Journal of International Law, 845–8
Simma, B. and Paulus, A., ‘The responsibility of individuals for human rights abuses in international conflicts: a positivist view’, in S. Ratner and A.-M. Slaughter (eds.), The methods of international law, Studies in transnational legal policy (Washington, DC: American Society of International Law, 2004), vol. 36, pp. 23–46
Simma, B. and Pulkowski, D., ‘Of planets and the universe: self-contained regimes in international law’ (2006) 17, European Journal of International Law, 483–529
Slaughter Burley, A.-M., ‘International law and international relations theory: a dual agenda’ (1998) 87, American Journal of International Law, 205–39
Slaughter, A.-M. and Ratner, S., ‘The method is the message’, in S. Ratner and A.-M. Slaughter (eds.), The methods of international law, Studies in transnational legal policy (Washington, DC: American Society of International Law, 2004), vol. 36, pp. 239–65
Slaughter, A.-M., Tulumello, A. S. and Wood, S., ‘International law and international relations theory: a new generation of interdisciplinary scholarship’ (1998) 92, The American Journal of International Law, 367–97
Slinn, P., ‘Development issues: the international law of development and global climate change’, in R. R. Churchill and D. Freestone (eds.), International law and climate change: prospects for progress in the legal order (London, Dordrecht: Graham & Trotman, Martinus Nijhoff, 1991), pp. 75–94
Smith, H. A., The economic uses of international rivers (London: P.S. King & Son, Ltd., 1931)
Snidal, D., ‘Coordination versus prisoner’s dilemma: implications for international cooperation and regimes’ (1985) 79, The American Political Science Review, 923–42
Sommer, J., ‘Environmental law-making by international organisations’ (1996) 56, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 628–67
Spence, C., Kulovesi, K., Gutiérrez, M. and Muñoz, M., ‘Great expectations: understanding Bali and the climate change negotiations process’ (2008) 17, Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 142–53
Steinberg, R. H., ‘Wanted – dead or alive: realism in international law’, in J. L. Dunoff and M. A. Pollack (eds.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on international law and international relations – the state of the art (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 146–72
Sterk, W.,
Arens, C.,
Kreibich, N.,
Mersmann, F. and
Wehnert, T.,
Sands are running out for climate protection: the Doha Climate Conference once again saves the UN climate process while real climate action is shelved for later,
http://wupperinst.org/uploads/tx_wupperinst/doha-report.pdf (2 February
2013)
Sterk, W., Ott, H., Watanabe, R. and Wittneben, B., ‘The Nairobi climate change summit (COP 12 – MOP 2): taking a deep breath before negotiating post-2012 targets?’ (2007) 4, Journal for European Environmental and Planning Law, 139–48
Sterling-Folker, J., ‘Competing paradigms or birds of a feather?: Constructivism and neoliberal institutionalism compared’ (2000) 44, International Studies Quarterly, 97–119
Strebel, H., ‘Quellen des Völkerrechts als Rechtsordnung’ (1976) 36, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 301–46
Streck, C., Chagas, T., von Unger, M. and O’Sullivan, R., ‘The Durban climate conference between success and frustration’ (2012) 9, Journal for European Environmental and Planning Law, 201–21
Streck, C., Meijer, E., Conway, D., von Unger, M., O’Sullivan, R. and Chagas, T., ‘The results and relevance of the Cancun climate conference’ (2011) 8, Journal for European Environmental and Planning Law, 165–88
Szell, P., ‘Decision making under multilateral environmental agreements’ (1996) 26, Environmental Policy and Law, 210–14
Szell, P., ‘Compliance regimes for multilateral environmental agreements: a progress report’ (1997) 27, Environmental Policy, 304–7
Talmon, S., ‘The Security Council as world legislature’ (2005) 99, American Journal of International Law, 175–93
Tammes, A. J. P., ‘Decisions of international organs’ (1958) 94, Recueil des Cours, 265–363
Tarlock, D., ‘Ecosystems’, in D. Bodansky, J. Brunnée and E. Hey (eds.), The Oxford handbook of international environmental law (Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 574–96
Thiele, C., Regeln und Verfahren der Entscheidungsfindung innerhalb von Staaten und Staatenverbindungen: Staats- und kommunalrechtliche sowie europa- und völkerrechtliche Untersuchungen (Berlin: Springer, 2008)
Thomasius, C., Fundamenta iuris naturae et gentium (Aalen: Scientia, 1979)
Tietje, C., ‘The changing legal structure of international treaties as an aspect of an emerging global governance architecture’ (1999) 42, German Yearbook of International Law, 26–55
Tomuschat, C., ‘Obligations arising for states without or against their will’ (1993) 241, Recueil des Cours, 199–374
Triepel, H., Völkerrecht und Landesrecht (Leipzig: C. L. Hirschfeld, 1899)
Tunkin, G. I., Völkerrechtstheorie (Berlin: Berlin Verlag, 1972)
Tunkin, G. I., Recht und Gewalt im internationalen System: Übersetzt von E. Rauch, Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Internationales Recht an der Universität Kiel (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1986), vol. 93
Ulfstein, G., ‘Reweaving the fabric of international law? Patterns of consent in environmental framework agreements: Comment by Geir Ulfstein’, in R. Wolfrum (ed.), Developments of international law in treaty making, Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht (Berlin: Springer, 2005), vol. 177, pp. 145–53
Ulfstein, G., ‘Treaty bodies’, in D. Bodansky, J. Brunnée and E. Hey (eds.), The Oxford handbook of international environmental law (Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 877–89
Ulfstein, G. and Werksman, J., ‘The Kyoto compliance system: towards hard enforcement’, in O. S. Stokke, J. Hovi and G. Ulfstein (eds.), Implementing the climate regime: international compliance (London: Earthscan, 2005), pp. 39–62
UN Doc. A/2995, Co-operation between States in the Field of the Environment (1972)
UN Doc. A/42/PV.99, Provisional verbatim record of the ninety-ninth meeting (1988)
UN Doc. A/55/49 (Vol. III), Resolutions and decisions adopted by the General Assembly during its fifty-fifth session (2001)
UN Doc. A/55/PV.103, General Assembly, fifty-fifth session, 103rd plenary meeting (2001)
UN Doc. A/56/16, Report of the Committee for Programme and Coordination on its forty-first session, 11 June–6 July 2001 (2001)
UN Doc. A/56/356, Report of the Joint Inspection Unit on experience with the follow-up system on Joint Inspection Unit reports and recommendations (2001)
UN Doc. A/8730, General Assembly Resolution 2997 (XXVII) (1972)
UN Doc. A/AC.237/L.23, Matters relating to commitments. Review of the adequacy of commitments in Article 4, paras. 2 (a) and (b). Letter dated 20 September 1994 from the Permanent Representative of Trinidad and Tobago to the UN in New York to the Executive Secretary of the interim secretariat, transmitting a draft protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change on greenhouse gas emissions reduction. Note by the interim secretariat (1994)
UN Doc. A/C.5/55/42, Letter dated 4 April 2001 from the Under-Secretary-General for Legal Affairs, the Legal Counsel, to the Chairman of the Fifth Committee (2001)
UN Doc. A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1, Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment (1973)
UN Doc. A/CONF.151/26 (Vol. IV), Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (1992)
UN Doc. A/RES/37/7, World Charter for Nature (1982)
UN Doc. A/RES/43/53, Protection of global climate for present and future generations of mankind (1988)
UN Doc. A/RES/44/207, Protection of global climate for present and future generations of mankind (1989)
UN Doc. C.N.796.2011.TREATIES-1, Depositary notification: Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; Canada: Withdrawal (2011)
UN Doc. CC/EB/2/2007/2, Eligibility requirements under Articles 6, 12 and 17 of the Protocol: initial eligibility (2007)
UN Doc. CC/EB/2/2007/3, Report on the meeting (2007)
UN Doc. CC-2007-1-13/Greece/EB, Decision under Paragraph 2 of Section X (party concerned: Greece) (2008)
UN Doc. CC-2008-1/Canada/EB, Information note (party concerned: Canada) (2008)
UN Doc. CC-2008-1-2/Canada/EB, Decision on preliminary examination (Party concerned: Canada) (2008)
UN Doc. CC-2008-1-6/Canada/EB, Decision not to proceed further (Party concerned: Canada) (2008)
UN Doc. CC-2008-1-7/Canada/EB, Document entitled, ‘Further written submission of Canada’ (2008)
UN Doc. CC-2009-1-6/Croatia/EB, Preliminary finding (Party concerned: Croatia) (2009)
UN Doc. CC-2009-1-7/Croatia/EB, Further written submission from Croatia (2009)
UN Doc. CC-2009-1-8/Croatia/EB, Final decision (Party concerned: Croatia) (2009)
UN Doc. CC-2009-1-9/Croatia/EB, Comments from Croatia on the final decision (2010)
UN Doc. CC-2010-1-8/Bugaria/EB, Final decision (Party concerned: Bulgaria) (2010)
UN Doc. FCCC/AWGLCA/2008/17, Report of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention on its fourth session, held in Poznan from 1 to 10 December 2008 (2009)
UN Doc. FCCC/AWGLCA/2009/L.7/Rev.1, Outcome of the work of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention (2009)
UN Doc. FCCC/AWGLCA/2009/MISC.4 (Part II), Ideas and proposals on the elements contained in paragraph 1 of the Bali Action Plan. Submissions from Parties. Part II (2009)
UN Doc. FCCC/AWGLCA/2010/6, Text to facilitate negotiations among Parties. Note by the Chair (2010)
UN Doc. FCCC/AWGLCA/2010/8, Text to facilitate negotiations among Parties. Note by the Chair (2010)
UN Doc. FCCC/AWGLCA/2010/14, Negotiating text. Note by the secretariat (2010)
UN Doc. FCCC/CP/1995/7/Add.1, Report of the Conference of the Parties on its first session, held at Berlin from 28 March to 7 April 1995. Addendum. Part two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its first session (1995)
UN Doc. FCCC/CP/1996/2, Organizational matters: Adoption of the rules of procedure. Note by the secretariat (1996)
UN Doc. FCCC/CP/1998/16/Add.1, Report of the Conference of the Parties on its fourth session, held at Buenos Aires from 2 to 14 November 1998. Addendum. Part two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its fourth session (1999)
UN Doc. FCCC/CP/2005/5/Add.1, Report of the Conference of the Parties on its eleventh session, held at Montreal from 28 November to 10 December 2005. Addendum. Part two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its eleventh session (2006)
UN Doc. FCCC/CP/2006/5/Add.1, Report of the Conference of the Parties on its twelfth session, held at Nairobi from 6 to 17 November 2006. Addendum. Part two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its twelfth session (2007)
UN Doc. FCCC/CP/2007/6/Add.1, Report of the Conference of the Parties on its thirteenth session, held in Bali from 3 to 15 December 2007. Addendum. Part two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its thirteenth session (2008)
UN Doc. FCCC/CP/2009/3, Draft protocol to the Convention prepared by the Government of Japan for adoption at the fifteenth session of the Conference of the Parties. Note by the secretariat (2009)
UN Doc. FCCC/CP/2009/4, Draft protocol to the Convention presented by the Government of Tuvalu under Article 17 of the Convention. Note by the secretariat (2009)
UN Doc. FCCC/CP/2009/5, Draft protocol to the Convention prepared by the Government of Australia for adoption at the fifteenth session of the Conference of the Parties. Note by the secretariat (2009)
UN Doc. FCCC/CP/2009/6, Draft protocol to the Convention prepared by the Government of Costa Rica to be adopted at the fifteenth session of the Conference of the Parties. Note by the secretariat (2009)
UN Doc. FCCC/CP/2009/7, Draft implementing agreement under the Convention prepared by the Government of the United States of America for adoption at the fifteenth session of the Conference of the Parties. Note by the secretariat (2009)
UN Doc. FCCC/CP/2009/11/Add.1, Report of the Conference of the Parties on its fifteenth session, held in Copenhagen from 7 to 19 December 2009. Addendum. Part two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its fifteenth session (2010)
UN Doc. FCCC/CP/2010/7, Report of the Conference of the Parties on its sixteenth session, held in Cancun from 29 November to 10 December 2010. Part one: Proceedings (2011)
UN Doc. FCCC/CP/2010/7/Add.1, Report of the Conference of the Parties on its sixteenth session, held in Cancun from 29 November to 10 December 2010. Addendum. Part two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its sixteenth session (2011)
UN Doc. FCCC/CP/2011/4/Rev.1, Revised proposal from Papua New Guinea and Mexico to amend Articles 7 and 18 of the Convention. Note by the secretariat (2011)
UN Doc. FCCC/CP/2011/9, Report of the Conference of the Parties on its seventeenth session, held in Durban from 28 November to 11 December 2011. Part one: Proceedings (2012)
UN Doc. FCCC/CP/2011/9/Add.1, Report of the Conference of the Parties on its seventeenth session, held in Durban from 28 November to 11 December 2011. Addendum. Part two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its seventeenth session (2012)
UN Doc. FCCC/CP/2012/8/Add.1, Report of the Conference of the Parties on its eighteenth session, held in Doha from 26 November to 8 December 2012. Addendum. Part two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its eighteenth session (2013)
UN Doc. FCCC/IRR/2007/CAN, Report of the review of the initial report of Canada (2008)
UN Doc. FCCC/IRR/2008/HRV, Report of the review of the initial report of Croatia (2009)
UN Doc. FCCC/KP/AWG/2008/8, Report of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Further Commitments for Annex I Parties under the Kyoto Protocol on its resumed sixth session, held in Poznan from 1 to 10 December 2008 (2009)
UN Doc. FCCC/KP/AWG/2009/L.15, Report of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Further Commitments for Annex I Parties under the Kyoto Protocol to the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol at its fifth session (2009)
UN Doc. FCCC/KP/AWG/2010/CRP.2, Consideration of further commitments for Annex I Parties under the Kyoto Protocol. Draft proposal by the Chair (2010)
UN Doc. FCCC/KP/CMP/2005/8/Add.1, Report of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol on its first session, held at Montreal from 28 November to 10 December 2005. Addendum. Part two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol at its first session (2006)
UN Doc. FCCC/KP/CMP/2005/8/Add.2, Report of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol on its first session, held at Montreal from 28 November to 10 December 2005. Addendum. Part two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol at its first session (2006)
UN Doc. FCCC/KP/CMP/2005/8/Add.3, decision 27/CMP.1, Annex, Procedures and mechanisms relating to compliance under the Kyoto Protocol (2006)
UN Doc. FCCC/KP/CMP/2005/8/Add.4, Report of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol on its first session, held at Montreal from 28 November to 10 December 2005. Addendum. Part two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol at its first session (2006)
UN Doc. FCCC/KP/CMP/2009/15/Add.1, Annual compilation and accounting report for Annex B Parties under the Kyoto Protocol. Note by the secretariat (2009)
UN Doc. FCCC/KP/CMP/2009/21/Add.1, Report of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol on its fifth session, held in Copenhagen from 7 to 19 December 2009. Addendum. Part two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol at its fifth session (2010)
UN Doc. FCCC/KP/CMP/2010/12, Report of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol on its sixth session, held in Cancun from 29 November to 10 December 2010; Part one: Proceedings (2011)
UN Doc. FCCC/KP/CMP/2010/12/Add.1, Report of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol on its sixth session, held in Cancun from 29 November to 10 December 2010. Addendum. Part two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol at its sixth session (2011)
UN Doc. FCCC/KP/CMP/2011/10/Add.1, Report of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol on its seventh session, held in Durban from 28 November to 11 December 2011. Addendum. Part two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol at its seventh session (2012)
UN Doc. FCCC/KP/CMP/2012/13/Add.1, Report of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol on its eighth session, held in Doha from 26 November to 8 December 2012. Addendum. Part two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol at its eighth session (2013)
UN Doc. FCCC/SB/2000/11, Procedures and mechanisms relating to compliance under the Kyoto Protocol. Text proposed by the Co-Chairmen of the Joint Working Group on Compliance (2000)
UN Doc. FCCC/SBI/1997/15, Arrangements for Intergovernmental Meetings. Amendments to the Convention or its Annexes, Letters from the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, the Azerbaijan Republic, the Netherlands (on behalf of the European Community and its Member States) and Kuwait proposing amendments to the Convention or its Annexes. Note by the secretariat (1997)
UN Doc. FCCC/SBI/2009/12, National greenhouse gas inventory data for the period 1990–2007. Note by the secretariat (2009)
Underdal, A., ‘The concept of regime “effectiveness”’ (1992) 27, Cooperation and Conflict, 227–40
UNEP Doc. UNEP/CBD/COP/6/20, Report of the Sixth Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (2002)
UNFCCC Secretariat, Notification to Parties, Communication of information relating to the Copenhagen Accord (2010)
UNFCCC Secretariat, Notification to Parties, Clarification relating to the Notification of 18 January 2010 (2010)
van Asselt, H. and Gupta, J., ‘Stretching too far? Developing countries and the role of flexibility mechanisms beyond Kyoto’ (2009) 28, Stanford Environmental Law Journal, 311–78
van Asselt, H., Sindico, F. and Mehling, M., ‘Global climate change and the fragmentation of international law’ (2008) 30, Law and Policy, 423–49
van Hoof, G. J. H., Rethinking the sources of international law (Deventer: Kluwer Law and Taxation Publications, 1983)
Verdross, A., Die Verfassung der Völkerrechtsgemeinschaft (Vienna, Berlin: Springer, 1926)
Verdross, A., ‘Entstehungsweisen und Geltungsgrund des universellen völkerrechtlichen Gewohnheitsrechts’ (1969) 29, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 635–53
Verdross, A. and Köck, H. F., ‘Natural law: the tradition of universal reason and authority’, in R. J. MacDonald and D. M. Johnston (eds.), The structure and process of international law: essays in legal philosophy doctrine and theory, Developments in international law, 2nd edn (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1983), pp. 17–50
Verdross, A. and Simma, B., Universelles Völkerrecht: Theorie und Praxis, 3rd edn (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1984)
Verschuuren, J., Principles of environmental law: the ideal of sustainable development and the role of principles of international, European and national environmental law (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2003)
Victor, D. G., Raustiala, K. and Skolnikoff, E. B., ‘Introduction and overview’, in D. Victor, K. Raustiala, E. B. Skolnikoff and D. G. Victor (eds.), The implementation and effectiveness of international environmental commitments: theory and practice (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998), pp. 1–46
Vihma, A., Elephant in the room: the New G77 and China dynamics in climate talks, The Finnish Institute of International Affairs, Briefing Paper No. 62 (Helsinki, 2010)
Voigt, C., ‘The legal form of the Durban Platform agreement: seven reasons for a protocol’ (2012) 15, Ethics, Policy and Environment, 276–82
von Stein, J., ‘The engines of compliance’, in J. L. Dunoff and M. A. Pollack (eds.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on international law and international relations – the state of the art (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 477–501
Vrolijk, C., ‘COP-6 collapse or “to be continued …?”’ (2001) 77, International Affairs, 163–9
Waltz, K. N., Theory of international politics, reissued (Long Grove: Waveland Press, 2010)
Wang, X. and Wiser, G., ‘The implementation and compliance regimes under the Climate Change Convention and its Kyoto Protocol’ (2002) 11, Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 181–98
Ward, H., ‘Game theory and the politics of global warming: the state of play and beyond’ (1996) 44, Political Studies, 850–71
Weil, P., ‘Towards relative normativity in international law’ (1983) 77, American Journal of International Law, 413–42
Wellens, K., ‘Fragmentation of international law and establishing an accountability regime for international organizations: the role of the judiciary in closing the gap’ (2004) 25, Michigan Journal of International Law, 1159
Wemaëre, M., ‘State of play of the international climate negotiations: what are the results of the Copenhagen conference?’ (2010), Carbon and Climate Law Review, 106–11
Wendt, A., ‘Constructing international politics’ (1995) 20, International Security, 71–81
Werksman, J., ‘The Conference of Parties to environmental treaties’, in J. Werksman (ed.), Greening international institutions, Law and sustainable development series (London: Earthscan, 1996), pp. 55–68
Werksman, J., Procedural and institutional aspects of the emerging climate change regime: do improvised procedures lead to impoverished rules? (London: Foundation for International Environmental Law and Development (FIELD), 1999)
Werksman, J., ‘The negotiation of a Kyoto compliance system’, in O. S. Stokke, J. Hovi and G. Ulfstein (eds.), Implementing the climate regime: international compliance (London: Earthscan, 2005), pp. 17–37
Wiersema, A., ‘The new international law-makers?: Conferences of the Parties to multilateral environmental agreements’ (2009) 31, Michigan Journal of International Law, 231–87
Wirth, D. A., ‘Current developments: the sixth session (Part Two) and seventh session of the Conference of the Parties to the Framework Convention on Climate Change’ (2002) 96, American Journal of International Law, 648–60
WMO Doc. No. 661, Report of the International Conference on the Assessment of the Role of Carbon Dioxide and of Other Greenhouse Gases in Climate Variations and Associated Impacts (1986)
WMO Doc. No. 710, Proceedings of the World Conference on the Changing Atmosphere: Implications for Global Security (1989)
Wolfrum, R., ‘Means of ensuring compliance with and enforcement of international environmental law’ (1998) 272, Recueil des Cours, 9–154
Wolfrum, R., ‘International environmental law: purposes, principles and means of ensuring compliance’, in F. L. Morrison and R. Wolfrum (eds.), International, regional, and national environmental law (The Hague, London: Kluwer Law International, 2000), pp. 3–70
Wolfrum, R. and Friedrich, J., ‘The Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol’, in U. Beyerlin, P.-T. Stoll and R. Wolfrum (eds.), Ensuring compliance with multilateral environmental agreements: a dialogue between practitioners and academia, Studies on the law of treaties (Leiden, Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff, 2006), pp. 53–68
Yamin, F., ‘The Kyoto Protocol: origins, assessment and future challenges’ (1998) 7, Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 113–27
Yamin, F. and Depledge, J., The international climate change regime: a guide to rules, institutions and procedures (Cambridge University Press, 2004)
Young, O. R., International cooperation: building regimes for natural resources and the environment, Cornell studies in political economy (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1989)
Young, O. R., International governance: protecting the environment in a stateless society, Cornell studies in political economy (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1994)
Young, O. R., ‘Hitting the mark: why are some international environmental agreements more successful than others?’ (1999) 41, Environment, 20–9
Young, O. R., ‘Effectiveness of international environmental regimes: existing knowledge, cutting-edge themes, and research strategies’ (2011) 108, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 19853–60
Young, O. R. and Levy, M. A., ‘The effectiveness of international environmental regimes’, in O. R. Young (ed.), The effectiveness of international environmental regimes: causal connections and behavioral mechanisms (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999), pp. 1–32
Zaelke, D. and Cameron, J., ‘Global warming and climate change – an overview of the international legal process’ (1990) 5, American University International Law Review, 249–90
Zammit Cutajar, M., ‘Reflections on the Kyoto Protocol – looking back to see ahead’ (2004) 5, International Review for Environmental Strategies, 61–70
Zemanek, K., ‘Majority rule and consensus technique in law-making diplomacy’, in R. J. MacDonald and D. M. Johnston (eds.), The structure and process of international law: essays in legal philosophy doctrine and theory, Developments in international law, 2nd edn (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1983), pp. 857–87
