Aarts, Bas, Lopez-Couso, Maria José, and Méndez-Naya, Belén. 2012. ‘Late Modern English Syntax’. In: Bergs, Alexander and Brinton, Laurel J. (eds.). English Historical Linguistics. Vol. i, 869–87. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Achard, Michel. 1998. Representation of Cognitive Structures: Syntax and Semantics of French Sentential Complements. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Ackema, Peter and Neeleman, Ad. 2004. Beyond Morphology. Interface Conditions on Word Formation. Oxford University Press.
Ackema, Peter and Schoorlemmer, Maaike. 1994. ‘The Middle Construction and the Syntax–Semantics Interface’. Lingua 93(1), 59–90.
Adamson, Sylvia. 2000. ‘A Lovely Little Example: Word-order Options and Category Shift in the Premodifying String’. In: Fischer, Olga, Rosenbach, Anette, and Stein, Dieter (eds.). Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English, 39–66. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Aijmer, Karin. 2009. ‘Seem and Evidentiality’. Functions of Language 16(1), 63–88.
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford University Press.
Alexiadou, Artemis and Doron, Edit. 2011. ‘The Syntactic Construction of Two Non-active Voices: Passive and Middle’. Journal of Linguistics 48(1), 1–34.
Algeo, John. 1995. ‘Having a Look at the Expanded Predicate’. In: Aarts, Bas and Meyer, Charles F. (eds.). The Verb in Contemporary English. Theory and Description, 203–17. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Algeo, John 2006. British or American English? A Handbook of Word and Grammar Patterns. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Algeo, John and Pyles, Thomas. 2005. The Origins and Developments of the English Language. Boston: Wadsworth.
Allen, Alexander and Cornwell, James. 1841. A New English Grammar, with Very Copious Exercises, and a Systematic View of the Formation and Derivation of Words. London: Simpkin, Marshall, & Co.
Allen, William. 1824. An English Grammar; with Exercises, Notes, and Questions. London: G. and W.B. Whittaker [First published 1813].
Allerton, David J. 2009. ‘Tag Questions’. In: Rohdenburg, Günter and Schlüter, Julia (eds.). One Language, Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English, 306–23. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Altick, Richard D. 1957. The English Common Reader: A Social History of the Mass Reading Public 1800–1900. University of Chicago Press.
Amador-Moreno, Carolina P. 2006. An Analysis of Hiberno-English in the Early Novels of Patrick MacGill. Bilingualism and Language Shift from Irish to English in County Donegal. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.
Amador-Moreno, Carolina P. 2010. An Introduction to Irish English. London: Equinox.
Andersen, Henning. 2001. ‘Actualization and the (Uni)directionality of Change’. In: Andersen, Henning (ed.). Actualization: Linguistics Change in Progress, 225–48. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Anderwald, Lieselotte. 2012. ‘Clumsy, Awkward or Having a Peculiar Propriety? Prescriptive Judgements and Language Change in the 19th Century’. Language Sciences 34(1), 28–53.
Anderwald, Lieselotte Submitted. Language Between Description and Prescription: Verb Categories in Nineteenth-Century Grammars of English. OxfordUniversity Press.
Appadurai, Arjun. 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Arnaud, René. 1983. ‘On the Progress of the Progressive in the Private Correspondence of Famous British People (1800–1880)’. In: Jacobson, Sven (ed.). Papers from the Second Scandinavian Symposium on Syntactic Variation, Stockholm, May 15–16, 1982, 83–94. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.
Arnaud, René 1998. ‘The Development of the Progressive in 19th Century English: A Quantitative Survey’. Language Variation and Change 10(2), 123–52.
Arnold, Thomas Kerchever. 1838. An English Grammar, for Classical Schools. Etymology. Parts I. and II. London: Rivington and Parker.
Asudeh, Ash and Toivonen, Ida. 2005. ‘Copy Raising and its Consequences for Perceptual Reports’. In: Grimshaw, Jane, Maling, Joan, Manning, Chris, Simpson, Jane, and Zaenen, Annie (eds.). Architectures, Rules, and Preferences. A Festschrift for Joan Bresnan, 1–19. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Asudeh, Ash and
Toivonen, Ida 2006. ‘Expletives and the Syntax and Semantics of Copy Raising’. In:
Butt, Miriam and
King, Tracy Holloway (eds.).
Proceedings of the LFG06 Conference.
Stanford, CA:
CSLI.
http://csli-publications.stanford.edu/.
Auer, Anita. 2006. ‘Precept and Practice: The Influence of Prescriptivism on the English Subjunctive’. In: Dalton-Puffer, Christiane, Kastovsky, Dieter, Ritt, Nikolaus, and Schendl, Herbert (eds.). Syntax, Style and Grammatical Norms: English from 1500–2000. Linguistic Insights, 33–53. Frankfurt: Lang.
Auer, Anita 2012. ‘Late Modern English Standardization’. In: Brinton, Laurel and Bergs, Alexander (eds.). Historical Linguistics of English: An International Handbook, 939–51. New York: de Gruyter.
Baayen, R. Harald. 2008. Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Bache, Carl. 1978. The Order of Premodifying Adjectives in Present-Day English. Odense University Press.
Bailey, Richard W. 1996. Nineteenth-Century English. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
Barber, Charles, Beal, Joan C., and Shaw, Philip A. 2009. The English Language: A Historical Introduction. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Bardon, Jonathan. 2011. The Plantation of Ulster: The British Colonisation of the North of Ireland in the Seventeenth Century. Dublin: Gill and Macmillan.
Beal, Joan. 1999. English Pronunciation in the Eighteenth Century: Thomas Spence’s ‘Grand Repository of the English Language’. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Beal, Joan 2004. English in Modern Times. 1700–1945. London: Arnold.
Behaghel, Otto. 1909. ‘Beziehungen zwischen Umfang und Reihenfolge von Satzgliedern’. Indogermanische Forschungen 25, 110–42.
Bell, Alan. 1984. ‘Language Style as Audience Design’. Language in Society 13(2), 145–204.
Berg, Thomas. 2012. ‘The Cohesiveness of English and German Compounds’. The Mental Lexicon 7(1), 1–33.
Berglund, Ylva. 2005. Expressions of Future in Present-Day English: A Corpus-based Approach. Uppsala University.
Bergs, Alexander. 2012. ‘New Perspectives, Theories and Methods: Construction Grammar’. In: Bergs, Alexander and Brinton, Laurel J. (eds.). English Historical Linguistics: An International Handbook, 1631–46. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Berlage, Eva. 2009. ‘Prepositions and Postpositions’. In: Rohdenburg, Günter and Schlüter, Julia (eds.). One Language, Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English, 130–48. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Berlage, Eva 2012. ‘At the Interface of Grammaticalisation and Lexicalisation: The Case of Take Prisoner’. English Language and Linguistics 16(1), 35–55.
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation Across Speech and Writing. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Biber, Douglas 2003a. ‘Variation among University Spoken and Written Registers: A New Multi-dimensional Analysis’. In: Leistyna, Pepi and Meyer, Charles F. (eds.). Corpus Analysis: Language Structure and Language Use, 47–70 (Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics 46). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Biber, Douglas 2003b. ‘Compressed Noun Phrase Structures in Newspaper Discourse: The Competing Demands of Popularization vs. Economy’. In: Aitchison, Jean and Lewis, Diana M. (eds.). New Media Language, 169–81. London: Routledge.
Biber, Douglas and Finegan, Edward. 1997. ‘Diachronic Relations among Speech-based and Written Registers in English’. In: Nevalainen, Terttu and Kahlas-Tarkka, Leena (eds.). To Explain the Present: Studies in the Changing English Language in Honour of Matti Rissanen, 253–75 (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki 52). Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
Biber, Douglas and Gray, Bethany. 2011. ‘Grammatical Change in the Noun Phrase: The Influence of Written Language Use’. English Language and Linguistics 15(2), 223–50.
Biber, Douglas, Finegan, Edward, and Atkinson, David. 1994. ‘ARCHER and Its Challenges: Compiling and Exploring a Representative Corpus of Historical English Registers’. In: Fries, Udo, Tottie, Gunnel, and Schneider, Peter (eds.). Creating and Using English Language Corpora, 1–14. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Biber, Douglas, Grieve, Jack, and Iberri-Shea, Gina. 2009. ‘Noun Phrase Modification’. In: Rohdenburg, Günter and Schlüter, Julia (eds.). One Language, Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English, 182–93. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan, and Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London and New York: Longman.
Bliss, Alan J. 1979. Spoken English in Ireland 1600–1740. Dublin: The Dolmen Press.
Bolinger, Dwight 1984. ‘English in the South of Ireland’. In: Trudgill, Peter (ed.). Language in the British Isles, 135–51. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Bod, Rens, Hay, Jennifer, and Jannedy, Stefanie (eds.). 2003. Probabilistic Linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bolinger, Dwight. 1967. ‘Adjectives in English: Attribution and Predication’. Lingua 18, 1–34.
Bolinger, Dwight 1972. Degree Words. The Hague and Paris: Mouton.
Bolinger, Dwight 1977. ‘Transitivity and Spatiality: The Passive of Prepositional Verbs’. In: Makkai, Adam Becker Makkai, Valerie, and Heilmann, Luigi (eds.). Linguistics at the Crossroads, 57–78. Lake Bluff, IL: Jupiter Press.
Bös, Birte. 2012. ‘From 1760 to 1960: Diversification and Popularization’. In: Facchinetti, Roberta, Brownlees, Nicholas, Bös, Birte, and Fries, Udo (eds.). News as Changing Texts: Corpora, Methodologies and Analysis, 91–143. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Boye, Kasper and Harder, Peter. 2007. ‘Complement-taking Predicates: Usage and Linguistic Structure’. Studies in Language 31(3), 569–606.
Braeken, Niels. 2011. ‘The Use of the a-Prefix with -ing-Clauses: A Corpus Analysis of its Distribution in the Suffolk English Dialect.’ Masters thesis, University of Leuven.
Brainerd, Barron. 1989 [1993]. ‘The Contractions of Not: A Historical Note’. Journal of English Linguistics 22(2), 176–96.
Breban, Tine. 2008. ‘Grammaticalization, Subjectification, and Leftward Movement of Adjectives of Difference in the Noun Phrase’. Folia Linguistica 42(3/4), 259–306.
Breban, Tine 2009. ‘Structural Persistence: A Case Based on the Grammaticalization of English Adjectives of Difference’. English Language and Linguistics 13(1), 77–96.
Breban, Tine 2010. English Adjectives of Comparison: Lexical and Grammaticalized Uses. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Breban, Tine and Davidse, Kristin. 2003. ‘Adjectives of Comparison: The Grammaticalization of Their Attribute Uses into Postdeterminer and Classifier Uses’. Folia Linguistica 37(3/4), 269–317.
Breivik, Leiv Egil and Martínez-Insua, Ana E. 2008. ‘Grammaticalization, Subjectification and Non-concord in English Existential Sentences’. English Studies 89(3), 351–62.
Brems, Lieselotte. 2003. ‘Measure Noun Constructions: An Instance of Semantically-driven Grammaticalization’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8(2), 283–312.
Brems, Lieselotte 2007. ‘The Grammaticalisation of Small Size Nouns: Reconsidering Frequency and Analogy’. Journal of English Linguistics 35(4), 293–324.
Brems, Lieselotte 2011. Layering of Size and Type Noun Constructions in English (Topics in English Linguistics 74.) Berlin: de Gruyter.
Brems, Lieselotte 2012. ‘The Establishment of Quantifier Constructions for Size Nouns: A Diachronic Case Study of heap(s) and lot(s)’. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 13(2), 202–31.
Bresnan, Joan. 1970. ‘On Complementizers: Toward a Syntactic Theory of Complement Types’. Foundations of Language 6(3), 297–321.
Bresnan, Joan 1979. Theory of Complementation in English Syntax. New York: Garland.
Bresnan, Joan and Ford, Marilyn. 2010. ‘Predicting Syntax: Processing Dative Constructions in American and Australian Varieties of English’. Language 86(1), 186–213.
Bresnan, Joan and Hay, Jennifer. 2008. ‘Gradient Grammar: An Effect of Animacy on the Syntax of Give in New Zealand and American English’. Lingua 118(2), 245–59.
Brinton, Laurel J. 1996a. Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Brinton, Laurel J. 1996b. ‘Attitudes Towards Increasing Segmentalization: Complex and Phrasal Verbs in English’. Journal of English Linguistics 24(3), 186–205.
Brinton, Laurel J. 2008a. The Comment Clause in English: Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development. (Studies in English Language). CambridgeUniversity Press.
Brinton, Laurel J. 2008b. ‘Where Grammar and Lexis Meet: Composite Predicates in English’. In: Seoane, Elena and López-Couso, María José (eds.). Theoretical and Empirical Issues in Grammaticalization, 33–53. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Brinton, Laurel J. and Arnovick, Leslie K. 2011. The English Language: A Linguistic History. Don Mills, Ont.: Oxford University Press.
Brinton, Laurel J. and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2005. Lexicalization and Language Change. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Brown, Lucy. 1985. Victorian News and Newspapers. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Burton-Roberts, Noel. 2006. ‘Parentheticals’. In: Brown, Keith (ed.). Encyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics. 2nd edn. Vol. ix, 179–82. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
Bybee, Joan L. 2004. ‘Mechanisms of Change in Grammaticization: The Role of Frequency’. In: Joseph, Brian D. and Janda, Richard D. (eds.). The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 602–23. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bybee, Joan L. 2007. Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language. OxfordUniversity Press.
Bybee, Joan L. 2010. Language, Usage and Cognition. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Bybee, Joan L. and Hopper, Paul J. (eds.). 2001. Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Bybee, Joan L., Perkins, Revere D., and Pagliuca, William. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. University of Chicago Press.
Cambridge International Dictionary of English. 1995. Procter, Paul (ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Canadian Oxford Dictionary. 2004. 2nd edn. Barber, Katherine (ed.). Toronto: Oxford University Press.
Chafe, Wallace. 1986. ‘Evidentiality in English Conversation and Academic Writing’. In: Chafe, Wallace and Nichols, Johanna (eds.). Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, 261–72. Norwood, NY: Ablex.
Channel, Joanna. 1994. Vague Language. OxfordUniversity Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Claridge, Claudia. 2000. Multi-word Verbs in Early Modern English: A Corpus-based Study. (Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics 32). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Claridge, Claudia 2013. ‘The Evolution of Three Pragmatic Markers: As it were, so tospeak/say and if you like’. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 14(2), 161–84.
Claridge, Claudia and Kytö, Merja. 2014. ‘I had lost sight of them then for a bit, but I went on pretty fast: Two Degree Modifiers in the Old Bailey Corpus’. In: Taavitsainen, Irma, Jucker, Andreas, and Tuominen, Jukka (eds.). Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Coates, Jennifer. 1983. The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries. London and Canberra: Croom Helm.
Coates, Jennifer 2004. Women, Men and Language: A Sociolinguistic Account of Gender Differences in Language. 3rd edn. Harlow: Pearson.
Cobbin, Ingram. 1864. Elements of English Grammar: Expressly Designed for the Juvenile Student, either at Home or in Preparatory Schools. Illustrated. London: William Tegg [First published 1828].
Collins, Peter. 2006. ‘Clause Types’. In: Aarts, Bas and McMahon, April (eds.). The Handbook of English Linguistics,180–97. Oxford and Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Collins, Peter 2009. Modals and Quasi-modals in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Collins, Peter and Yao, Xinyue. 2012. ‘Modals and Quasi-modals in New Englishes’. In: Hundt, Marianne and Gut, Ulrike (eds.). Mapping Unity and Diversity World-wide: Corpus-based Studies of New Englishes, 35–53. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Coupland, Nikolas. 2009. ‘Response: The Mediated Performance of Vernaculars’. Journal of English Linguistics 37(3), 284–300.
Croft, William. 2000. Explaining Language Change. London: Longman.
Croft, William 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. OxfordUniversity Press.
Croft, William 2004. ‘Logical and Typological Arguments for Radical Construction Grammar’. In: Fried, Mirjam and Östman, Jan-Ola (eds.). Construction Grammar(s): Cognitive and Cross-language Dimensions, 273–314. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Croft, William and Cruse, D. Alan. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). CambridgeUniversity Press.
Crystal, David. 1969. Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Culpeper, Jonathan and Kytö, Merja. 2010. Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Curme, George O. 1913. ‘Has English a Future Tense?’ The Journal of English and Germanic Philology 12(4), 515–39.
Dancygier, Barbara and Sweetser, Eve. 2005. Mental Spaces in Grammar: Conditional Constructions. (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 108). CambridgeUniversity Press.
DARE = Cassidy, Frederic G., and Hall, Joan Houston (comps.). 1985–2002. Dictionary of American Regional English. 4 vols. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Davidse, Kristin. 1992. ‘Transitivity/Ergativity: The Janus-headed Grammar of Actions and Events’. In: Davies, Martin and Ravelli, Louise (eds.). Advances in Systemic Linguistics, 105–35. London: Pinter.
Davidse, Kristin and Heyvaert, Liesbet. 2003. ‘On the Middle Construction in English and Dutch’. In: Granger, Sylviane, Lerot, Jacques, and Petch-Tyson, Stephanie (eds.). Corpus-based Approaches to Contrastive Linguistics and Translation Studies, 57–73. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Davies, Eirlys. 1986. The English Imperative. London: Croom Helm.
Davies, Mark. 2012. ‘The 400 Million Word Corpus of Historical American English (1810–2009)’. In: Hegedűs, Irén and Fodor, Alexandra (eds.). English Historical Linguistics 2010, 219–49. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
De Clerck, Bernard. 2004. ‘On the Pragmatic Functions of let’s Utterances’. In: Aijmer, Karin and Altenberg, Bengt (eds.). Advances in Corpus Linguistics. Papers from the 23rd International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 23), 213–37. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Declerck, Renaat. 1981. ‘On the Role of the Progressive Aspect in Nonfinite Perception Verb Complements’. Glossa 15, 83–113.
Declerck, Renaat 1982. ‘The Triple Origin of Participial Perception Verb Complements’. Linguistic Analysis 10, 1–26.
Declerck, Renaat 1991. A Comprehensive Descriptive Grammar of English. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
Dehé, Nicole. 2009. ‘Clausal Parentheticals, Intonational Phrasing, and Prosodic Theory’. Journal of Linguistics 45(3), 569–615.
Dehé, Nicole and Kavalova, Yordanka (eds.). 2007. Parentheticals. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Dehé, Nicole and Wichmann, Anne. 2010a. ‘Sentence-initial I think (that) and I believe (that): Prosodic Evidence for Use as Main Clause, Comment Clause and Discourse Marker’. Studies in Language 34(1), 36–74.
De Smet, Hendrik 2010b. ‘The Multifunctionality of Epistemic Parentheticals in Discourse: Prosodic Cues to the Semantic–Pragmatic Boundary’. Functions of Language 17(1), 1–28.
Denison, David. 1993. English Historical Syntax: Verbal Constructions. London: Longman.
Denison, David 1998. ‘Syntax’. In: Romaine, Suzanne (ed.). The Cambridge History of the English Language Vol. iv: 1776–1997, 92–329. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Denison, David 2006. ‘Category Change and Gradience in the Determiner System’. In: van Kemenade, Ans and Los, Bettelou (eds.). The Handbook of the History of English, 279–304. Oxford: Blackwell.
Denison, David 2010. ‘Category Change in English with and without Structural Change’. In: Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Trousdale, Graeme (eds.). Gradience, Gradualness, and Grammaticalization, 105–28. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Denison, David and Hundt, Marianne. 2013. ‘Defining Relatives’. Journal of English Linguistics 41(2), 135–67.
De Smet, Hendrik. 2008. ‘Diffusional Change in the English System of Complementation.’ PhD dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of Leuven.
De Smet, Hendrik 2010. ‘English –ing-Clauses and Their Problems: The Structure of Grammatical Categories’. Linguistics 48(6), 1153–93.
De Smet, Hendrik 2012a. ‘The Course of Actualization’. Language 88(3), 601–33.
De Smet, Hendrik 2012b. ‘Review of Yoko Iyeiri. Verbs of Implicit Negation and Their Complements in the History of English’. ICAME Journal 35, 138–43.
De Smet, Hendrik 2013a. Spreading Patterns: Diffusional Change in the English System of Complementation. New York and OxfordUniversity Press.
De Smet, Hendrik 2013b. ‘Change through Recombination. Blending and Analogy’. Language Sciences 40, 80–94.
De Smet, Hendrik and Heyvaert, Liesbet. 2011. ‘The Meaning of the English Present Participle’. English Language and Linguistics 15(3), 473–98.
Diessel, Holger and Tomasello, Michael. 2001. ‘The Acquisition of Finite Complement Clauses in English: A Corpus-based Analysis’. Cognitive Linguistics 12(2), 97–141.
Diewald, Gabriele. 2002. ‘A Model for Relevant Types of Contexts in Grammaticalization’. In: Wischer, Ilse and Diewald, Gabriele (eds.). New Reflections on Grammaticalization, 103–20. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Diewald, Gabriele 2011. ‘Pragmaticalization (Defined) as Grammaticalization of Discourse Functions’. Linguistics 49(2), 365–90.
Dixon, Robert M.W. 1991. A New Approach to English Grammar on Semantic Principles. OxfordUniversity Press.
Dixon, Robert M.W. 2005. A Semantic Approach to English Grammar. OxfordUniversity Press.
Duffley, Patrick. 1992. The English Infinitive. London: Longman.
Duffley, Patrick 1999. ‘The Use of the Infinitive and the –ing after Verbs Denoting the Beginning, Middle and End of an Event’. Folia Linguistica 33(3/4), 295–331.
Elmer, Willy. 1981. Diachronic Grammar: The History of Old and Middle English Subjectless Constructions. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Erades, P.A. 1950. ‘Points of Modern English Syntax’ xii. English Studies 31(1–6), 153–57.
Espinal, M. Teresa. 1991. ‘The Representation of Disjunct Constituents’. Language 67(4), 726–62.
Evans, Nicholas. 2007. ‘Insubordination and Its Uses’. In: Nikolaeva, Irena (ed.). Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, 366–431. OxfordUniversity Press.
Fagan, Sarah M.B. 1988. ‘The English Middle’. Linguistic Inquiry 19(2), 181–203.
Fagan, Sarah M.B. 1992. The Syntax and Semantics of Middle Constructions: A Study with Special Reference to German. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Faltz, Leonard M. 1985. Reflexivization: A Study in Universal Syntax. New York and London: Garland.
Fanego, Teresa. 1996. ‘The Development of Gerunds as Objects of Subject-control Verbs in English (1400–1700). Diachronica 13(1), 29–62.
Fagan, Sarah M.B. 1998. ‘Developments in Argument Linking in Early Modern English Gerund Phrases’. English Language and Linguistics 2(1), 87–119.
Fagan, Sarah M.B. 2004. ‘On Reanalysis and Actualization in Syntactic Change: The Rise and Development of English Verbal Gerunds’. Diachronica 21(1), 5–55.
Farrelly, Michael and Seoane, Elena. 2012. ‘Democratization’. In: Nevalainen, Terttu and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, 392–401. New York: OxfordUniversity Press.
Fawcett, Robin P. 1980. Cognitive Linguistics and Social Interaction: Towards an Integrated Model of a Systemic Functional Grammar and the Other Components of a Communicating Mind. Heidelberg: Julius Groos Verlag.
Felser, Claudia. 1999. Verbal Complement Clauses. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Fens-de Zeeuw, Lyda. 2011. Lindley Murray (1745–1826), Quaker and Grammarian. Utrecht: LOT Publications.
Filppula, Markku. 1999. The Grammar of Irish English: Language in Hibernian Style. London: Routledge.
De Smet, Hendrik 2003. ‘The Quest for the Most “Parsimonious” Explanations: Endogeny vs. Contact Revisited’. In: Hickey, Raymond (ed.). Motives for Language Change, 161–73. CambridgeUniversity Press.
De Smet, Hendrik 2008. ‘Irish English: Morphology and Syntax’. In: Kortmann, Bernd and Upton, Clive (eds.). Varieties of English. Vol. i: The British Isles, 328–59. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Fischer, Olga. 1995. ‘The Distinction between to and Bare Infinitival Complements in Late Middle English’. Diachronica 12(1), 1–30.
Fischer, Olga 2007. Morphosyntactic Change: Functional and Formal Perspectives. OxfordUniversity Press.
Fisk, Allen. 1822. Murray’s English Grammar Simplified; Designed to Facilitate the Study of the English Language; Comprehending the Principles and Rules of English Grammar, Illustrated by Appropriate Exercises; to which is Added a Series of Questions for Examination. Abridged for the Use of Schools. Troy, NY: Z. Clark. [First published 1821].
Fitzgerald, Patrick and Lambkin, Brian. 2008. Migration in Irish History, 1607–2007. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fries, Charles Carpenter. 1925. ‘The Periphrastic Future with shall and will in Modern English’. PMLA 40(4), 963–1024.
Garcia de la Maza, Casilda. 2012. Gradient Acceptability at the Grammar–Pragmatics Interface: A Study of the Constraints on Middle Formation in English. Munich: Lincom.
Geeraerts, Dirk. 1997. Diachronic Prototype Semantics: A Contribution to Historical Lexicology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Geisler, Christer. 2002. ‘Investigating Register Variation in Nineteenth-Century English: A Multi-dimensional Comparison’. In: Reppen, Randi, Fitzmaurice, Susan M., and Biber, Douglas (eds.). Using Corpora to Explore Linguistic Variation, 249–71 (Studies in Corpus Linguistics 9). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Ghesquière, Lobke. 2010. ‘On the Subjectification and Intersubjectification Paths Followed by the Adjectives of Completeness’. In: Davidse, Kristin, Vandelanotte, Lieven, and Cuyckens, Hubert (eds.). Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalisation, 277–314. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Gisborne, Nikolas. 2010. The Event Structure of Perception Verbs. OxfordUniversity Press.
Gisborne, Nikolas and Holmes, Jasper. 2007. ‘A History of English Evidential Verbs of Appearance’. English Language and Linguistics 11(1), 1–29.
Gisborne, Nikolas and Patten, Amanda. 2011. ‘Grammaticalization and Construction Grammar’. In: Narrog, Heiko and Heine, Bernd (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization. OxfordUniversity Press.
Givón, Talmy. 1979. On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press.
Givón, Talmy 1980. ‘The Binding Hierarchy and the Typology of Complements’. Studies in Language 4(3), 333–77.
Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, Adele and Ackerman, Farrell. 2001. ‘The Pragmatics of Obligatory Adjuncts’. Language 77(4), 798–814.
Görlach, Manfred. 1998. An Annotated Bibliography of 19th-Century Grammars of English. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Görlach, Manfred 1999. English in Nineteenth-Century England: An Introduction. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Görlach, Manfred 2001. Eighteenth-Century English. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag C. Winter.
Görlach, Manfred. 2002. A Textual History of Scots. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag C. Winter.
Gotti, Maurizio. 2003. ‘Shall and Will in Contemporary English: A Comparison with Past Uses’. In: Facchinetti, Roberta, Krug, Manfred, and Palmer, Frank (eds.). Modality in Contemporary English, 267–300. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Grafmiller, Jason. Forthcoming. ‘Variation in English Genitives Across Modality and Genre’. English Language and Linguistics.
Gries, Stefan T. 2002. ‘Evidence in Linguistics: Three Approaches to Genitives in English’. In: Brend, Ruth M., Sullivan, William J., and Lommel, Arle R.LACUS Forum XXVIII: What Constitutes Evidence in Linguistics, 17–31. Fullerton, CA: LACUS.
Görlach, Manfred 2012. ‘Statistische Modellierung’. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 40(1), 38–67.
Gries, Stefan T. and Hilpert, Martin. 2010. ‘Modeling Diachronic Change in the Third Person Singular: A Multi-factorial, Verb- and Author-specific Exploratory Approach’. English Language and Linguistics 14(3), 293–320.
Haegeman, Liliane. 1991. ‘Parenthetical Adverbials: The Radical Orphanage Approach’. In: Chiba, Shuki, Ogawa, Akira, Fuiwara, Yasuaki, Yamade, Norio, Koma, Osamu, and Yagi, Takao (eds.). Aspects of Modern English Linguistics, 232–54. Tokyo: Kaitakushi.
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard. 1998. The Function of Discourse Particles: A Study with Special Reference to Spoken Standard French (Pragmatics and Beyond, New Series 53). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Harris, John. 1984a. ‘English in the North of Ireland’. In: Trudgill, Peter (ed.). Language in the British Isles, 115–134. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Harris, John. 1984b. ‘Syntactic Variation and Dialect Divergence’. Journal of Linguistics 20(2), 303–27.
Harris, John. 1993. ‘The Grammar of Irish English’. In: Milroy, James and Milroy, Lesley (eds.). Real English. The Grammar of English Dialects in the British Isles, 139–86. London: Longman.
Harvey, Thomas W. 1868. A Practical Grammar of the English Language, for the Use of Schools of Every Grade. Cincinnati and New York: van Antwerp, Bragg & Co.
Haspelmath, Martin. 1989. ‘From Purposive to Infinitive’. Folia Linguistica Historica 10(1/2), 281–310.
Heine, Bernd. 1997. Possession: Cognitive Sources, Forces, and Grammaticalization. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Heine, Bernd 2002. ‘On the Role of Context in Grammaticalization’. In: Wischer, Ilse and Diewald, Gabriele (eds.). New Reflections on Grammaticalization, 83–101. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Heine, Bernd 2012a. ‘Between Sentence Grammar and Discourse Grammar: On Insubordination’. Unpublished paper.
Heine, Bernd 2012b. ‘On Discourse Markers: Grammaticalisation, Pragmaticalization, or Something Else?’ Unpublished paper.
Heyvaert, Liesbet. 2008. ‘On the Constructional Semantics of Gerundive Nominalizations’. Folia Linguistica 42(1), 39–82.
Hickey, Raymond. 2005. Dublin English: Evolution and Change. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Hickey, Raymond 2007a. Irish English: History and Present-Day Forms. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Hickey, Raymond 2007b. ‘Southern Irish English’. In: Britain, David (ed.). Language in the British Isles, 135–51. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Hilpert, Martin. 2013. Constructional Change in English. Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation and Syntax. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2004. ‘Lexicalization and Grammaticalization: Opposite or Orthogonal?’ In: Bisang, Walter, Himmelmann, Nikolaus P., and Wiemer, Björn (eds.). What Makes Grammaticalization? A Look from its Fringes and its Components, 21–42 (Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 158). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Hinrichs, Lars and Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2007. ‘Recent Changes in the Function and Frequency of Standard English Genitive Constructions: A Multivariate Analysis of Tagged Corpora’. English Language and Linguistics 11(3), 437–74.
Hirschberg, Julia. 2004. ‘Pragmatics and Intonation’. In: Horn, Laurence R. and Ward, Gregory (eds.). The Handbook of Pragmatics, 515–37. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hoffmann, Sebastian. 2004. ‘Are Low-frequency Complex Prepositions Grammaticalized?’ In: Lindquist, Hans and Mair, Christian (eds.). Corpus Approaches to Grammaticalization in English, 171–210. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Hoffmann, Sebastian, Hundt, Marianne, and Mukherjee, Joybrato. 2011. ‘Indian English – an Emerging Epicentre? A Pilot Study on Light Verbs in Web-derived Corpora of South Asian Englishes’. Anglia 129 (3–4), 258–80.
Hoffmann, Thomas and Trousdale, Graeme. 2011. ‘Variation, Change, and Constructions in English’. Cognitive Linguistics 22(1),1–23. doi 10.1515/cogl.2011.01.
Hogg, Richard M. 2002. An Introduction to Old English. Edinburgh University Press.
Holtz, Louis. 1981. Donat et la tradition de l’enseignement grammatical: étude sur l’Ars Donati et sa diffusion (IVe-IXe siècle) et édition critique. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.
Hopper, Paul J. 1991. ‘On Some Principles of Grammaticization’. In: Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Heine, Bernd (eds.). Approaches to Grammaticalization. Vol. i: Focus on Theoretical and Methodological Issues, 17–35. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Hopper, Paul J. and Thompson, Sandra A. 1980. ‘Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse’. Language 56(2), 251–99.
Hopper, Paul J. and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2003. Grammaticalization. 2nd edn. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Houston, Ann. 1985. ‘Continuity and Change in English Morphology. The Variable (ING).’ PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Howe, Chad and Heller, Brooke. 2010. ‘Turns Out They Weren’t Much of a Stretch: Variable Patterns of Structural Persistence’. Paper presented at 39th New Ways of Analyzing Variation. University of Texas at San Antonio, November 2010.
Huber, Magnus.
2007. ‘The Old Bailey Proceedings, 1674–1834: Evaluating and Annotating a Corpus of 18th- and 19th-century Spoken English’. In:
Meurman-Solin, Anneli and
Nurmi, Arja (eds.).
Annotating Variation and Change (Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 1). n.p. Available at
www.helsinki.fi/varieng/series/volumes/01/huber/.
Huddleston, Rodney and Pullum, Geoffrey K., et al. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Hudson, Rodney. 1976. ‘Some Theoretical Issues in the Description of the English Verb’. Lingua 40(4), 331–83.
Hundt, Marianne. 2001. ‘What Corpora Can Tell Us about the Grammaticalisation of Voice in Get-constructions’. Studies in Language 25(1), 49–88.
Hundt, Marianne 2004a. ‘The Passival and the Progressive Passive: A Case Study of Layering in the English Aspect and Voice Systems’. In: Lindquist, Hans and Mair, Christian (eds.). Corpus Approaches to Grammaticalization in English, 79–120. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Hundt, Marianne 2004b. ‘Animacy, Agentivity, and the Spread of the Progressive in Modern English’. English Language and Linguistics 8(1), 47–69.
Hundt, Marianne 2006. ‘“Curtains like these are selling right in the city of Chicago for $1.50” – The Mediopassives in American 20th-century Advertising Language’. In: Renouf, Antoinette and Kehoe, Andrew (eds.). The Changing Face of Corpus Linguistics. Papers from the Twenty-Fourth International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 24),135–51. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Hundt, Marianne 2007. English Mediopassive Constructions: A Cognitive, Corpus-Based Study of their Origin, Spread and Current Status. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Hundt, Marianne 2009. ‘Colonial Lag, Colonial Innovation or Simply Language Change?’ In: Rohdenburg, Günter and Schlüter, Julia (eds.). One Language, Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English, 13–37. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Hundt, Marianne Forthcoming A. ‘The Demise of the Being to V Construction’. To appear in Transactions of the Philological Society.
Hundt, Marianne Forthcoming B. ‘Global Spread of English: Processes of Change’. To appear in Kytö, Merja and Pahta, Päivi (eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of English Historical Linguistics. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Hundt, Marianne and Mair, Christian. 1999. ‘“Agile” and “Uptight” Genres: The Corpus-based Approach to Language Change in Progress’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 4(2), 221–42.
Hundt, Marianne and Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2012. ‘Animacy in Early New Zealand English’. English World-Wide 33(3), 241–63. doi:10.1075/eww.33.3.01hun.
Hundt, Marianne, Denison, David, and Schneider, Gerold. 2012. ‘Relative Complexity in Scientific Discourse’. English Language and Linguistics 16(2), 209–40.
Hurst, Dorothy Ann. 1951. ‘Influence of Subject and Connotation of Force’. Hispania 34(1), 74–78.
Ingersoll, Charles M. 1824. Conversations on English Grammar; Explaining the Principles and Rules of the Language. Illustrated by Appropriate Exercises; Abridged and Adapted to the Use of Schools. 4th edn. Portland: Charles Green. [First published 1821].
Iyeiri, Yoko 2010. Verbs of Implicit Negation and their Complements in the History of English. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Jack, George. 1988. ‘The Origins of the English Gerund’. Nowele 12, 15–75.
Jankowski, Bridget. 2004. ‘A Transatlantic Perspective of Variation and Change in English Deontic Modality’. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 23, 85–113.
Jankowski, Bridget 2009. ‘Grammatical and Register Variation and Change: A Multi-corpora Perspective on the English Genitive’. Paper Presented at the American Association for Corpus Linguistics (AACL) 2009.
Jespersen, Otto. 1909–49. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. 7 vols. London: Allen & Unwin.
Jespersen, Otto 1940. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Vol v: Syntax. London: Allen & Unwin.
Jespersen, Otto 1942. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Vol. vi: Morphology. Copenhagen: Ejnar Munksgaard.
Jones, Charles. 1989. A History of English Phonology. London: Longman.
Joos, Martin. 1968. The English Verb: Form and Meanings. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Joseph, Brian. 1992. ‘Diachronic Explanation: Putting Speakers Back into the Picture’. In: Davis, Garry W. and Iverson, Gregory K. (eds.) Explanation in Historical Linguistics, 123–44. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Kallen, Jeffrey L. 1989. ‘Tense and Aspect Categories in Irish English’. English World-Wide 10(1), 1–39.
Kallen, Jeffrey L. 2013. Irish English. Vol. ii: Republic of Ireland. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Kaltenböck, Gunther. 2007. ‘Spoken Parenthetical Clauses in English’. In: Dehé, Nicole and Kavalova, Yordanka (eds.). Parentheticals, 25–52. (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 106). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Kaltenböck, Gunther 2011. ‘Explaining Diverging Evidence: The Case of Clause-initial I think’. In: Schönefeld, Doris (ed.). Converging Evidence. Methodological and Theoretical Issues for Linguistic Research, 81–112. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Heine, Bernd, and Kuteva, Tania. 2011. ‘On Thetical Grammar’. Studies in Language 35(4), 848–93. doi: 10.1075/sl.35.4.03kal.
Kärkkäinen, Elise. 2003. Epistemic Stance in English Conversation: A Description of Interactional Functions with a Focus on I Think. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Kavalova, Yordanka. 2007. ‘And-parenthetical Clauses’. In: Dehé, Nicole and Kavalova, Yordanka (eds.). Parentheticals,145–72 (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 106). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Kearns, Kate. 2007. ‘Epistemic Verbs and Zero Complementizer’. English Language and Linguistics 11(3), 475–505.
Kenny, William David. 1858. An English Grammar; Adapted to the Comprehension of Young Persons, with Syntactical Observations for more Advanced Students, Orthographical Exercises, Lessons on Parsing, Exercises, and Questions for Examination. London: Routledge.
Kirk, John M. and Kallen, Jeffrey L. 2006. ‘Irish Standard English: How Celticised? How Standardised?’ In: Tristram, Hildegard L.C. (ed.). The Celtic Englishes IV, 88–113. Potsdam University Press.
König, Ekkehard and Kortmann, Bernd. 1991. ‘On the Reanalysis of Verbs as Prepositions’. In: Rauh, Gisa (ed.). Approaches to Prepositions,109–25.Tübingen: Narr.
Kortmann, Bernd. 1997. Adverbial Subordination: A Typology and History of Adverbial Subordinators Based on European Languages. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Kortmann, Bernd 2008a. ‘Synopsis: Morphological and Syntactic Variation in the British Isles’. In: Kortmann, Bernd and Upton, Clive (eds.). Varieties of English. Vol. i: The British Isles, 478–95. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Kortmann, Bernd 2008b. ‘List of Features: Morphology and Syntax’. In: Kortmann, Bernd and Upton, Clive (eds.). Varieties of English. Vol. i: The British Isles, xxv–xxix. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Kranich, Svenja. 2010. The Progressive in Modern English: A Corpus-based Study of Grammaticalization and Related Changes (Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics 72). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Krapp, George Philip. 1909. Modern English: Its Growth and Present Use. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Krug, Manfred. 2000. Emerging English Modals: A Corpus-based Study of Grammaticalization. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Krug, Manfred 2008. ‘Modality and the History of English Adhortatives’. In: Salkie, Raphael, Bussuttil, Pierre, and van der Auwera, Johan (eds.). Modality in English: Theory and Description, 319–48. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Kytö, Merja. 1994. ‘BE vs. HAVE with Intransitives in Early Modern English’. In: Fernández, Francisco, Fuster, Miguel, and Calvo, Juan José (eds.). English Historical Linguistics 1992, 179–90. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Kytö, Merja 1997. ‘Be/Have + Past Participle: The Choice of the Auxiliary with Intransitives from Late Middle to Modern English’. In: Rissanen, Matti, Kytö, Merja, and Heikkonen, Kirsi (eds.). English in Transition: Corpus-based Studies in Linguistic Variation and Genre Styles, 16–85. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Kytö, Merja 1999. ‘Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Verbs in Early Modern English: A Corpus-based Study of MAKE, HAVE, GIVE, TAKE, and DO’. In: Brinton, Laurel J. and Akimoto, Minoji (eds.). Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English,167–206. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Kytö, Merja and Walker, Terry. 2003. ‘The Linguistic Study of Early Modern English Speech-related Texts: How ‘Bad’ Can ‘Bad’ Data Be?’ Journal of English Linguistics 31(3), 221–48.
Kytö, Merja, Rudanko, Juhani, and Smitterberg, Erik. 2000. ‘Building a Bridge between the Present and the Past: A Corpus of 19th-Century English’. ICAME Journal 24, 85–97.
Kytö, Merja, Rydén, Mats, and Smitterberg, Erik. 2006. ‘Introduction: Exploring Nineteenth-Century English – Past and Present Perspectives’. In: Kytö, Merja, Rydén, Mats, and Smitterberg, Erik (eds.). Nineteenth-Century English: Stability and Change, 1–16. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Labov, William. 1972. ‘Some Principles of Linguistic Methodology’. Language in Society 1(1), 97–120.
Labov, William 1989. ‘The Child as Linguistic Historian’. Language Variation and Change 1, 85–94.
Lampert, Günther and Lampert, Martina. 2010. ‘Where Does Evidentiality Reside? Notes on (Alleged) Limiting Cases: Seem and Be Like’. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 63(4), 308–21.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. ii: Descriptive Application. Stanford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. OxfordUniversity Press.
Lee, Alan J. 1976. The Origins of the Popular Press in England: 1855–1914. London: Croom Helm.
Leech, Geoffrey. 2003. ‘Modality on the Move: The English Modal Auxiliaries 1961–1992’. In: Facchinetti, Roberta, Krug, Manfred, and Palmer, Frank R. (eds.). Modality in Contemporary English, 223–40. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Leech, Geoffrey and Mair, Christian. 2006. ‘Current Changes’. In: Aarts, Bas and McMahon, April (eds.). The Handbook of English Linguistics, 318–42. Oxford: Blackwell.
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian, and Smith, Nicholas. 2009. Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Legenhausen, Lienhard. 1998. ‘Mediopassives: Fuzziness and Speaker Evaluation’. In: Kühlwein, Wolfgang (ed.). Language as Structure and Language as Process: In Honour of Gerhard Nickel on the Occasion of His 70th Birthday, 47–62. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.
Lehmann, Christian. 1982. Thoughts on Grammaticalization: A Programmatic Sketch. Arbeiten des Kölner Universalien-Projektes. University of Cologne, Institut für Sprachwissenschaft. [In 1995 published as Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Munich: Lincom.].
Lehmann, Christian 1985. ‘Grammaticalization: Synchronic Variation and Diachronic Change’. Lingua e Stile 20, 303–18.
Lehmann, Christian 1988. ‘Towards a Typology of Clause Linkage’. In: Haiman, John and Thompson, Sandra (eds.). Clause Combining in Discourse and Grammar, 181–225. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Lehmann, Christian 1995. Thoughts on Grammaticalisation. Munich: Lincom.
Leitner, Gerhard (ed.). 1986. The English Reference Grammar: Language and Linguistics, Writers and Readers. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Leitner, Gerhard (ed.). 1991. English Traditional Grammars: An International Perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Lemmens, Maarten. 1997. ‘The Transitive–Ergative Interplay and the Conception of the World: A Case Study’. In: Verspoor, Marjolijn, Lee, Kee Dong, and Sweetser, Eve (eds.). Lexical and Syntactical Constructions and the Construction of Meaning, 363–82. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Lemmens, Maarten 1998a. Lexical Perspectives on Transitivity and Ergativity: Causative Constructions in English. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Leonard, Sterling Andrus. 1929. The Doctrine of Correctness in English Usage: 1700–1800. New York: Russell & Russell.
Levin, Beth. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. University of Chicago Press.
Lewis, Michael. 2002. The English Verb: An Exploration of Structure and Meaning. Boston: Heinle and Thomson.
Live, Anna H. 1973. ‘The take-have Phrasal in English’. Linguistics 95, 31–50.
López-Couso, María José. 1996. ‘On the History of Methinks: From Impersonal Construction to Fossilized Expression’. Folia Linguistica Historica 17(1/2), 153–69.
López-Couso, María José 2007. ‘Auxiliary and Negative Cliticisation in Late Modern English’. In: Pérez-Guerra, Javier, González-Álvarez, Dolores, Bueno-Alonso, Jorge L., and Rama-Martínez, Esperanza (eds.). ‘ Of Varying Language and Opposing Creed’ : New Insights into Late Modern English, 301–23 (Linguistic Insights 28). Bern: Lang.
López-Couso, María José 2010. ‘Subjectification and Intersubjectification’. In: Jucker, Andreas H. and Taavitsainen, Irma (eds.). Historical Pragmatics, 127–63. (Handbook of Pragmatics, Vol. viii). Berlin: de Gruyter.
López-Couso, María José and Méndez-Naya, Belén. 2012a. ‘On the Use of as if, as though and like in Present-Day English Complementation Structures’. Journal of English Linguistics 40(2), 172–95.
López-Couso, María José 2012b. ‘On Comparative Complementizers in English: Evidence from Historical Corpora’. In: Vázquez, Nila (ed.). Creation and Use of Historical English Corpora in Spain, 311–33. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
López-Couso, María José and Méndez-Naya, Belén 2014 a. ‘From Clause to Pragmatic Marker: A Study of the Development of Like-parentheticals in American English’. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 15(1), 66–91.
López-Couso, María José and Méndez-Naya, Belén 2014 b. ‘On the Origin of Clausal Parenthetical Constructions: Epistemic/Evidential Parentheticals with Seem and Impersonal Think’. In: Taavitsainen, Irma, Jucker, Andreas, and Tuominen, Jukka (eds.). Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics, 189–212 (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 243.) Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Lorenz, David. 2012. ‘Semi-modal Constructions in English: Emancipation through Frequency.’ PhD thesis, University of Freiburg.
Los, Bettelou. 2005. The Rise of the To-infinitive. OxfordUniversity Press.
Lowth, Robert. 1762. A Short Introduction to English Grammar. London: Hughs. [1967 Menston: Scolar Press (facsimile)].
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Vol. i. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Macafee, Caroline.
2011. ‘Characteristics of Nonstandard Grammar in Scotland’.
http://archive.is/apy4m (accessed 19 February 2014).
McArthur, Tom (ed.). 1992. The Oxford Companion to the English Language. Oxford University Press.
McCafferty, Kevin 2007. ‘Northern Irish English’. In: Britain, David (ed.). Language in the British Isles, 122–34. CambridgeUniversity Press.
McCawley, John. 1982. ‘Parentheticals and discontinuous constituent structure’. Linguistic Inquiry 13(1), 91–106.
McFadden, Thomas. 2007a. ‘Auxiliary “Selection” and Restrictions on Perfect Semantics: An Early English/Modern Scandinavian Parallel’. Paper presented at the Sixth York-Newcastle-Holland Symposium on the History of English Syntax, Leiden, 2007.
McFadden, Thomas 2007b. ‘Auxiliary Selection’. Language and Linguistics Compass 1(6), 674–708.
Mair, Christian. 1997. ‘Parallel Corpora: A Real-time Approach to the Study of Language Change in Progress’. In: Ljung, Magnus (ed.). Corpus-based Studies in English: Papers from the Seventeenth International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 17), Stockholm, 15–19 May, 1996, 195–209 (Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics 20). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Mair, Christian 2002. ‘Three Changing Patterns of Verb Complementation in Late Modern English’. English Language and Linguistics 6(1), 105–31.
Mair, Christian 2003. ‘Gerundial Complements after Begin and Start: Grammatical and Sociolinguistic Factors, and How They Work Against Each Other’. In: Rohdenburg, Günter and Mondorf, Britta (eds.). Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English, 329–45. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Mair, Christian 2005. ‘The Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries as a Critical Period in the Formation of the Modern English System of Non-finite Complement Clauses’. In: Houswitschka, Christoph, Knappe, Gabriele, and Müller, Anja (eds.). Anglistentag 2005 Bamberg, 531–42. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.
Mair, Christian 2006. Twentieth-century English: History, Variation, and Standardization. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Mair, Christian 2009. ‘Corpus Linguistics Meets Sociolinguistics: The Role of Corpus Evidence in the Study of Sociolinguistic Variation and Change’. In: Renouf, Antoinette and Kehoe, Andrew (eds.). Corpus Linguistics: Refinements and Reassessments. Proceedings of the 2007 ICAME Conference – Stratford-upon-Avon, 1–26. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Mair, Christian 2012. ‘Using the World-Wide Web to Study Language Change in Progress: From Opportunistic to Systematic Use’. In: Nevalainen, Terttu and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, 245–55. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mair, Christian and Garley, Matthew. Forthcoming. ‘Support for Do-support with Got in Informal Mainstream Usage? – Changing Speaker Attitudes to a Stigmatised Construction in North American English’.
Mason, Charles Peter. 1858. English Grammar; Including the Principles of Grammatical Analysis. London: Walton and Maberly.
Mathews, Harriet. 1892. Outlines of English Grammar with Continuous Selections for Practice. Boston, MA: D.C. Heath and Co.
Melchers, Gunnel 1992. ‘‘Du’s no heard da last o’ dis’ – On the Use of Be as a Perfective Auxiliary in Shetland Dialect’. In: Rissanen, Matti, Ihalainen, Ossi, Nevalainen, Terttu, and Taavitsainen, Irma (eds.). History of Englishes. New Methods and Interpretations in Historical Linguistics, 602–10. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Mair, Christian 2008. ‘English Spoken in Orkney and Shetland: Morphology, Syntax, and Lexicon’. In: Kortmann, Bernd and Upton, Clive (eds.). Varieties of English Vol. i: The British Isles, 285–98. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Melchers, Gunnel and Sundkvist, Peter. 2010. ‘Orkney and Shetland’. In: Schreier, Daniel, Trudgill, Peter, Schneider, Edgar W., and Williams, Jeffrey P. (eds.). The Lesser-Known Varieties of English, 17–34. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Méndez-Naya, Belén. 2008. ‘Special Issue on English Intensifiers: Introduction’. English Language and Linguistics 12(2), 213–19.
Miller, D. Gary. 2001. Nonfinite Structures in Theory and Change. OxfordUniversity Press.
Miller, Jim. 2004. ‘Perfect and Resultative Constructions in Spoken and Non-spoken English’. In: Fischer, Olga, Norde, Muriel, and Perridon, Harry (eds.). Up and Down the Cline: the Nature of Grammaticalization, 229–46. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Mindt, Dieter. 1992. Zeitbezug im Englischen: eine didaktische Grammatik des englischen Futurs. Tübingen: Narr.
Mindt, Dieter 2000. An Empirical Grammar of the English Verb. Berlin: Cornelsen.
Moessner, Lilo. 1997. ‘The Syntax of Older Scots’. In: Jones, Charles (ed.). The Edinburgh History of the Scots Language, 112–55. Edinburgh University Press.
Mondorf, Britta. 2010. ‘Causative Verbs in British and American English’. Paper presented at the ICAME conference, University of Giessen, Germany, 26–30 May 2010.
Mulligan, John. 1868. Exposition of the Grammatical Structure of the English Language; Being an Attempt to Furnish an Improved Method of Teaching Grammar. For the Use of Schools and Colleges. New York: D. Appleton and Company [First published 1858].
Murray, Lindley. 1795. English Grammar, Adapted to the Different Classes of Learners. With an Appendix, Containing Rules and Observations for Promoting Perspicuity in Speaking and Writing. York: Wilson, Spence, and Mawman.
Murray, Thomas E. and Simon, Beth Lee. 1999. ‘Want + Past Participle in American English’. American Speech 74(2), 140–64.
Mustanoja, Tauno F. 1960. A Middle English Syntax. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
Næss, Åshild. 2007. Prototypical Transitivity. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Navest, Karlijn. 2011. John Ash and the Rise of Children’s Grammar. Utrecht: LOT Publications.
Nesselhauf, Nadja. 2007. ‘The Spread of the Progressive and Its “Future” Use’. English Language and Linguistics 11(1), 193–209.
Nesselhauf, Nadja 2010. ‘The Development of Future Time Expressions in Late Modern English: Redistribution of Forms or Change in Discourse?’ In: Depraetere, Ilse and Williams, Christopher (eds.). Future Time Reference in English, Special Issue of English Language and Linguistics 14(2), 163–86.
Nesselhauf, Nadja 2012. ‘Mechanisms of Language Change in a Functional System: The Recent Semantic Evolution of English Future Time Expressions’. Journal of Historical Linguistics 2(1), 83–132.
Nesselhauf, Nadja 2013. ‘The Emergence and Early Development of Present-Day ’ll’. Studia Neophilologica 85(2), 157–173.
Nickel, Gerhard. 1966. Die Expanded Form im Altenglischen. Vorkommen, Funktion und Herkunft der Umschreibung beon/wesan + Partizip Präsens. Neumünster: Karl Wachholtz.
Nickel, Gerhard 1968. ‘Complex Verbal Structures in English’. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 6(1–4), 1–21.
Noël, Dirk. 2003. ‘Is There Semantics in all Syntax? The Case of Accusative and Infinitive Constructions vs. That-clauses’. In: Rohdenburg, Günter and Mondorf, Britta (eds.). Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English, 347–77. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Noël, Dirk 2007. ‘Diachronic Construction Grammar and Grammaticalization Theory’. Functions of Language 14(2), 177–202.
Noonan, Michael. 1985. ‘Complementation’. In: Shopen, Timothy (ed.). Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Vol. ii, 42–140. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Nunberg, Geoffrey, Sag, Ivan A., and Wasow, Thomas. 1994. ‘Idioms’. Language 70(3), 491–538.
Ó Sé, Diarmaid. 1992. ‘The Perfect in Irish’. Ériu 43, 39–67.
Ó Siadhail, Mícheál. 1989. Modern Irish: Grammatical Structure and Dialectal Variation. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Övergaard, Gerd. 1995. The Mandative Subjunctive in British and American English in the 20th Century. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis and Stockholm: Almquist and Wiksell.
Palander-Collin, Minna. 1999. Grammaticalization and Social Embedding: I THINK and METHINKS in Middle and Early Modern English (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki 55). Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
Palmer, Frank Robert. 1988. The English Verb. 2nd edn. London: Longman.
Paradis, Carita. 2008. ‘Configurations, Construals and Change: Expressions of degree’. English Language and Linguistics 12(2), 317–43.
Parker, Richard G. and Fox, Charles. 1835. Progressive Exercises in English Grammar. Part ii. Containing the Principles of the Synthesis or Construction of the English Language. Boston: Crocker & Brewster; and New York: Leavitt, Lord & Co. [First published 1834].
Partington, Alan. 1996. Patterns and Meanings: Using Corpora for English Language Research and Teaching. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Pavlenko, Alexander 1997. ‘The Origin of the be-perfect with Transitives in the Shetland Dialect’. Scottish Language 16, 88–96.
Peitsara, Kirsti. 2004. ‘Variants of Contraction: The Case of it’s and ’tis’. ICAME Journal 28, 77–94.
Perek, Florent and
Lemmens, Maarten.
2010. ‘
Getting at the Meaning of the English at-Construction: The Case of a Constructional Split’.
CogniTextes 5.
http://cognitextes.revues.org/331 (accessed 19 February 2014).
Peters, Hans. 1993. Die englischen Gradadverbien der Kategorie booster. Tübingen: Narr.
Phillipps, K.C. 1984. Language and Class in Victorian England. Oxford: Blackwell.
Pinheiro, José C. and Bates, Douglas M. 2000. Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS. New York: Springer.
Plungian, Vladimir A. 2001. ‘The Place of Evidentiality within the Universal Grammatical Space’. Journal of Pragmatics 33(3), 349–57.
Potts, Chris. 2002. ‘The Syntax and Semantics of as-parentheticals’. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20(3), 623–89.
Poutsma, Hendrik 1926. A Grammar of Late Modern English. Part ii: The Parts of Speech. Section ii: The Verb and the Particles. Groningen: P. Noordhoff.
Priestley, Joseph. 1768. The Rudiments of Grammar, Adapted to the Use of Schools; With Notes and Observations, for the Use of Those Who have Made some Proficiency in the Language. 2nd edn. London: printed for T. Becket and P.A. De Hondt, and J. Johnson. [First published 1761].
Prince, Ellen. 1972. ‘A Note on Aspect in English: The take a walk Construction’. In: Ploetz, Senta (ed.). Transformationelle Analyse, 409–19. Frankfurt: Athenum.
Pullum, Geoffrey K. 1997. ‘The Morpholexical Nature of To-contraction’. Language 73(1), 79–102.
Quackenbos, George P. 1868. An English Grammar. New York: D. Appleton and Company [First published 1862].
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey, and Svartvik, Jan. 1972. A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey, and Svartvik, Jan 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
R Development Core Team.
2011.
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.
Vienna,
Austria.
www.R-project.org/ (accessed 19 February 2014).
Radford, Andrew. 1997. Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Rampton, Ben. 1995. Crossing: Language and Ethnicity Among Adolescents. London: Longman.
Renouf, Antoinette and Sinclair, John. 1991. ‘Collocational Frameworks in English’. In: Aijmer, Karin and Altenberg, Bengt (eds.). English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik, 128–43. London: Longman.
Rissanen, Matti. 1999. ‘Syntax’. In: Lass, Roger (ed.). The Cambridge History of the English Language. Vol. iii 1476–1776, 187–331. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rohdenburg, Günter. 1995. ‘On the Replacement of Finite Complement Clauses by Infinitives in English’. English Studies 76(4), 367–88.
Rohdenburg, Günter 1996. ‘Cognitive Complexity and Increased Grammatical Explicitness in English’. Cognitive Linguistics 7(2), 149–82.
Rohdenburg, Günter 2006a. ‘The Role of Functional Constraints in the Evolution of the English Complementation System’. In: Dalton-Puffer, Christiane, Kastovsky, Dieter, Ritt, Nikolaus, and Schendl, Herbert (eds.). Syntax, Style and Grammatical Norms: English from 1500–2000, 143–66. Bern: Lang.
Rohdenburg, Günter 2006b. ‘Discrepancies Between the Rule Formulations Advanced by Famous Linguists and Their Own Written Usage’. In: Kötter, Markus, Traxel, Oliver, and Gabel, Stephan (eds.). Investigating and Facilitating Language Learning. Papers in Honour of Lienhard Legenhausen, 47–63. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.
Rohdenburg, Günter 2008. ‘On the History and Present Behaviour of Subordinating Conjunctions in English’. In: Seoane, Elena and Lopéz-Couso, María José (eds.). Theoretical and Empirical Issues in Grammaticalization, 315–31. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Rohdenburg, Günter 2009. ‘Grammatical Divergence between British and American English in the Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries’. In: Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid, and van der Wurff, Wim (eds.). Current Issues in Late Modern English, 301–29. Bern: Lang.
Rohdenburg, Günter 2013. ‘Using the OED Quotations Database as a Diachronic Corpus’. In: Krug, Manfred and Schlüter, Julia (eds.). Research Methods in Language Variation and Change, 136–157. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Rohdenburg, Günter and Schlüter, Julia. 2009. ‘New Departures’. In: Rohdenburg, Günter and Schlüter, Julia (eds.). One Language, Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English, 364–423. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Ronan, Patricia. 2005. ‘The After-perfect in Irish English’. In: Filppula, Markku, Klemola, Juhani, and Palander, Marjatta (eds.). Dialects Across Borders. Selected Papers from the 11th International Conference on Methods in Dialectology (Methods XI), Joensuu, August 2002, 253–70. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Rooryck, Johan. 2000. Configurations of Sentential Complementation: Perspectives from Romance Languages. London: Routledge.
Rosenbach, Anette. 2002. Genitive Variation in English: Conceptual Factors in Synchronic and Diachronic Studies. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Rosenbach, Anette 2003. ‘Aspects of Iconicity and Economy in the Choice Between the S-genitive and the Of-genitive in English’. In: Rohdenburg, Günter and Mondorf, Britta (eds.). Determinants Of Grammatical Variation in English, 379–412. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Rosenbach, Anette 2004. ‘The English S-genitive: A Case of Degrammaticalization?’ In: Fischer, Olga, Perridon, Harry, and Norde, Muriel (eds.). Up and Down the Cline: The Nature of Grammaticalization, 73–96. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Rosenbach, Anette 2005. ‘Animacy Versus Weight as Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English’. Language 81(3), 613–44.
Rosenbach, Anette 2008. ‘Animacy and Grammatical Variation: Findings from English Genitive Variation’. Lingua 118(2), 151–71.
Rosenbaum, Peter. 1967. The Grammar of English Predicate Complementation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ross, John Robert. 1973a. ‘Slifting’. In: Gross, Maurice, Halle, Morris, and Schützenberger, Marcel-Paul (eds.). The Formal Analysis of Natural Languages. Proceedings of the First International Conference, 133–69. The Hague and Paris: Mouton.
Ross, John Robert 1973b. ‘A Fake NP Squish’. In: Bailey, Charles-James N. and Shuy, Roger (eds.). New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English, 96–140. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Ross, John Robert 1995. ‘Defective Noun Phrases’. In: Dainora, Audra, Hemphill, Rachel, Luka, Barbara, Need Barbara, and Pargman, Sheri (eds.). Proceedings of the Thirty-First Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 398–440. University of Chicago Press.
Rosta, Andrew. 1995. ‘How Does This Sentence Interpret? The Semantics of English Mediopassives’. In: Aarts, Bas and Meyer, Charles F. (eds.). The Verb in Contemporary English: Theory and Description, 123–44. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Rouchota, Villy. 1998. ‘Procedural Meaning and Parenthetical Discourse Marker’. In: Jucker, Andreas H. and Ziv, Yael (eds.). Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory, 97–126 (Pragmatics & Beyond, New Series 57). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Rudanko, Juhani 1996. Prepositions and Complements: A Syntactic and Semantic Study of Verbs Governing Prepositions and Complement Clauses in Present-Day English. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Rudanko, Juhani 1998. Change and Continuity in the English Language: Studies on Complementation over the Past Three Hundred Years. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Rudanko, Juhani 1999. Diachronic Studies of English Complementation Patterns: Eighteenth Century Evidence in Tracing the Development of Verbs and Adjectives Selecting Prepositions and Complement Clauses. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Rudanko, Juhani 2000. Corpora and Complementation. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Rudanko, Juhani 2006. ‘Watching English Grammar Change’. English Language and Linguistics 10(1), 31–48.
Rudanko, Juhani 2010. ‘Explaining Grammatical Variation and Change: A Case Study of Complementation in American English over Three Decades’. Journal of English Linguistics 38(1), 4–24.
Rudanko, Juhani 2012. ‘Exploring Aspects of the Great Complement Shift, with Evidence from the TIME Corpus and COCA’. In: Nevalainen, Terttu and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, 222–32. New York: OxfordUniversity Press.
Rydén, Mats. 1984. ‘The Study of Eighteenth Century English Syntax’. In: Fisiak, Jacek (ed.). Historical Syntax, 509–20. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Rydén, Mats 1991. ‘The be/have Variation with Intransitives in its Crucial Phases’. In: Kastovsky, Dieter (ed.). Historical English Syntax, 343–54. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Rydén, Mats and Brorström, Sverker. 1987. The be/have Variation with Intransitives in English, with Special Reference to the Late Modern Period. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.
Sahkai, Heete. 2009. ‘Implications of a Construction for the Theory of Grammaticalization: Estonian Adhesive Manner and Cause Adverbials’. TRAMES 13(4), 374–400.
Schelfhout, Carla,
Coppen, Peter-Arno, and
Oostdijk, Nelleke.
2004. ‘
Finite Comment Clauses in Dutch: A Corpus-based Approach’.
Journal of Germanic Linguistics 16(4),
331–49. doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1470542704040437.
Schlüter, Julia. 2009. ‘The Conditional Subjunctive’. In: Rohdenburg, Günter and Schlüter, Julia (eds.). One Language, Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English, 277–305. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Schneider, Gerold.
2012. ‘Adapting a Parser to Historical English’. In:
Tyrkkö, Jukka,
Kilpiö, Matti,
Nevalainen, Terttu, and
Rissanen, Matti (eds.).
Outposts of Historical Corpus Linguistics: From the Helsinki Corpus to a Proliferation of Resources (Studies in Variation, Contact and Change in English, Vol.
x).
Helsinki University.
www.helsinki.fi/varieng/series/volumes/10/schneider/ (accessed 19 February 2014).
Schneider, Stefan. 2007. Reduced Parenthetical Clauses as Mitigators: A Corpus Study of Spoken French, Italian and Spanish. (Studies in Corpus Linguistics 27). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Schönberger, Axel. 2009. Die Ars maior des Aelius Donatus: lateinischer Text und kommentierte deutsche Übersetzung einer antiken Lateingrammatik des 4. Jahrhunderts for den fortgeschrittenen Anfängerunterricht. Frankfurt am Main: Valentia.
Scott, Mike. 2009. Wordsmith Tools 5.0. OxfordUniversity Press.
Searle, John R. 1976. ‘A Classification of Illocutionary Acts’. Language in Society 5(1), 1–23.
Searle, John R. 1979. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Seggewiß, Friederike. 2012. ‘Current Changes in the English Modals: A Corpus-based Analysis of Present-Day Spoken English’. PhD dissertation, University of Freiburg.
Seiler, Hans-Jakob. 1982. Possession as an Operational Dimension of Language. Tübingen: Narr.
Seoane, Elena and Suárez-Gómez, Cristina. 2013. ‘The Expression of the Perfect in East and South-East Asian Englishes’. English World-Wide 34(1), 1–25.
Seppänen, Aimo. 1977. ‘The Position of let in the English Auxiliary System’. English Studies 58(6), 515–29.
Shih, Stephanie, Grafmiller, Jason, Futrell, Richard, and Bresnan, Joan. Forthcoming. ‘Rhythm’s Role in Genitive Construction Choice in Spoken English’. In: Vogel, Ralf and van de Vijver, Ruben (eds.). Rhythm in Phonetics, Grammar and Cognition, Berlin: de Gruyter.
Smith, Jennifer and Durham, Mercedes. 2012. ‘Bidialectalism or Dialect Death? Explaining Generational Change in the Shetland Islands, Scotland’. American Speech 87(1), 59–88.
Smith, Michael B and Escobedo Joyce. 2002. ‘The Semantics of to-Infinitival vs. –ing Verb Complement Constructions in English’. In: Andronis, Mary, Ball, Christopher, Elston, Heidi, and Neuvel, Sylvain (eds.). The Proceedings from the Main Session of the Chicago Linguistic Society’s Thirty-seventh Meeting, 549–65. Chicago Linguistic Society.
Smith, Nicholas and Rayson, Paul. 2007. ‘Recent Change and Variation in the British English Use of the Progressive Passive’. ICAME Journal 31, 129–60.
Smith, Roswell Chamberlain. 1841. English Grammar on the Productive System: A Method of Instruction Recently Adopted in Germany and Switzerland. Designed for Schools and Academies. Stereotype edition. Hartford: John Paine [First published 1831].
Smitterberg, Erik. 2005. The Progressive in 19th-century English: A Process of Integration. (Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics 54). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Smitterberg, Erik 2008. ‘The Progressive and Phrasal Verbs: Evidence of Colloquialization in Nineteenth-Century English?’ In: Nevalainen, Terttu, Taavitsainen, Irma, Pahta, Päivi, and Korhonen, Minna (eds.). The Dynamics of Linguistic Variation: Corpus Evidence on English Past and Present, 269–89 (Studies in Language Variation 2). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Smitterberg, Erik 2012. ‘Colloquialization and Not-Contraction in Nineteenth-Century English’. In: Markus, Manfred, Iyeiri, Yoko, Heuberger, Reinhard, and Chamson, Emil (eds.). Middle and Modern English Corpus Linguistics: A Multi-dimensional Approach, 191–206 (Studies in Corpus Linguistics 50). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Spasov, Dimiter. 1966. English Phrasal Verbs. Sofia: Naouka i Izkoustvo.
Stein, Gabriele. 1991. ‘The Phrasal Verb Type “to have a look”in Modern English’. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 19(1–4), 1–29.
Stenson, Nancy. 1981. Studies in Irish Syntax. Tübingen: Narr.
Straaijer, Robin. 2009. ‘Deontic and Epistemic Modals as Indicators of Prescriptive and Descriptive Language in the Grammars by Joseph Priestley and Robert Lowth’. In: Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid and van der Wurff, Wim (eds.). Current Issues in Late Modern English, 57–87. Bern: Lang.
Straaijer, Robin 2011. Joseph Priestley, Grammarian: Late Modern English Normativism and Usage in a Sociohistorical Context. Utrecht: LOT Publications.
Stuurman, Frits. 1990. Two Grammatical Models of Modern English. The Old and the New from A to Z. London: Routledge.
Sundby, Bertil, Bjørge, Anne Kari, and Haugland, Kari E. 1991. A Dictionary of English Normative Grammar: 1700–1800 (Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 63). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Swan, Toril. 2003. ‘Present Participles in the History of English and Norwegian’. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 104, 179–95.
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2006. Morphosyntactic Persistence in Spoken English: A Corpus Study at the Intersection of Variationist Sociolinguistics, Psycholinguistics, and Discourse Analysis. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt 2013. ‘The Great Regression: Genitive Variability in Late Modern English News Texts’. In: Börjars, Kersti, Denison, David, and Scott, Alan (eds.). Morphosyntactic Categories and the Expression of Possession, 59–88. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt and Hinrichs, Lars. 2008. ‘Probabilistic Determinants of Genitive Variation in Spoken and Written English: A Multivariate Comparison Across Time, Space, and Genres’. In: Nevalainen, Terttu, Taavitsainen, Irma, Pahta, Päivi, and Korhonen, Minna (eds.). The Dynamics of Linguistic Variation: Corpus Evidence on English Past and Present, 291–309. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. and D’Arcy, Alexandra. 2007. ‘The Modals of Obligation/Necessity in Canadian Perspective’. English World-Wide 28(1), 47–87.
Tagliamonte, Sali A., D’Arcy, Alexandra, and Jankowski, Bridget. 2010. ‘Social Work and Linguistic Systems: Marking Possession in Canadian English’. Language Variation and Change 22(1), 149–73.
Taglicht, Josef. 1970. ‘The Genesis of the Conventional Rules for the Use of Shall and Will’. English Studies 51(3), 193–213.
Thim, Stefan. 2012. Phrasal Verbs: The English Verb-particle Combination and Its History (Topics in English Linguistics 78). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Thomas, Russel. 1931. ‘Syntactical Processes Involved in the Development of the Adnominal Periphrastic Genitive in the English Language’. PhD thesis, University of Michigan.
Thompson, Sandra A. and Mulac, Anthony. 1991. ‘A Quantitative Perspective on the Grammaticalization of Epistemic Parentheticals in English’. In: Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Heine, Bernd (eds.). Approaches to Grammaticalization. Vol. ii, 313–29. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid (ed.). 2008. Grammars, Grammarians and Grammar-Writing in 18th Century England. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid 2009. An Introduction to Late Modern English. Edinburgh University Press.
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid 2011. The Bishop’s Grammar: Robert Lowth and the Rise of Prescriptivism in English. OxfordUniversity Press.
Timberlake, Alan. 1977. ‘Reanalysis and Actualisation in Syntactic Change’. In: Li, Charles N. (ed.). Mechanisms of Syntactic Change, 141–77. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Torres Cacoullos, Rena and Walker, James A. 2009. ‘The Present of the English Future: Grammatical Variation and Collocations in Discourse’. Language 85 (2), 321–54.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1992. ‘Syntax’. In: Hogg, Richard M. (ed.). The Cambridge History of the English Language. Vol. i: The Beginnings to 1066, 168–289. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs 1995. ‘Subjectification in Grammaticalisation’. In: Stein, Dieter and Wright, Susan (eds.). Subjectivity and Subjectivisation: Linguistic Perspectives, 31–54. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs 2003. ‘From Subjectification to Intersubjectification’. In: Hickey, Raymond (ed.). Motives for Language Change, 124–39. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs 2006. ‘The Semantic Development of Scalar Focus Modifiers’. In: van Kemenade, Ans and Los, Bettelou (eds.). The Handbook of the History of English, 335–59. Oxford: Blackwell.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs 2007. ‘The Concepts of Constructional Mismatch and Type-shifting From the Perspective of Grammaticalization’. Cognitive Linguistics 18(4), 523–57.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs 2008a. ‘The Grammaticalisation of NP of NP Patterns’. In: Bergs, Alexander and Diewald, Gabriele (eds.). Constructions and Language Change, 23–45. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs 2008b. ‘Grammaticalization, Constructions and the Incremental Development of Language: Suggestions from the Development of Degree Modifiers in English’. In: Eckardt, Regine, Jäger, Gerhard, and Veenstra, Tonjes (eds.). Variation, Selection, Development: Probing the Evolutionary Model of Language Change, 219–50. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs 2010. ‘(Inter)subjectivity and (Inter)subjectification: A Reassessment’. In: Davidse, Kristin, Vandelanotte, Lieven, and Cuyckens, Hubert (eds.). Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, 29–71. (Topics in English Linguistics 66). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs 2012b. ‘Grammatical Constructionalization: Rethinking Grammaticalisation in the Light of Constructionalization’. In collaboration with Graeme Trousdale. Lecture presented at the University of Santiago de Compostela. 17 Oct.
www.stanford.edu/~traugott/resources/TraugottSantiago2.pptx.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs 2012c. ‘The Status of Onset Contexts in Analysis of Micro-changes’. In: Kytö, Merja (ed.). English Corpus Linguistics: Crossing Paths, 221–55. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Dasher, Richard B. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 97). CambridgeUniversity Press.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and König, Ekkehard. 1991. ‘The Semantics–Pragmatics of Grammaticalization Revisited’. In: Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Heine, Bernd (eds.). Approaches to Grammaticalization. Vol. i: Focus on Theoretical and Methodological Issues, 189–218. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Trousdale, Graeme. 2010. ‘Gradience, Gradualness and Grammaticalization: How Do They Intersect?’. In: Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Trousdale, Graeme (eds.). Gradience, Gradualness, and Grammaticalization, 19–44. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Trousdale, Graeme 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. (Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics 6). OxfordUniversity Press.
Trousdale, Graeme. 2008a. ‘Constructions in Grammaticalization and Lexicalization: Evidence from the History of a Composite Predicate Construction in English’. In: Trousdale, Graeme and Gisborne, Nikolas (eds.). Constructional Approaches to English Grammar, 33–67. (Topics in English Linguistics). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Trousdale, Graeme 2008b. ‘A Constructional Approach to Lexicalization Processes in the History of English: Evidence from Possessive Constructions’. Word Structure 1, 156–77.
Trousdale, Graeme 2010. ‘Issues in Constructional Approaches to Grammaticalization in English’. In: Stathi, Katarine, Gehweiler, Elke, and König, Ekkehard (eds.). Grammaticalization: Current Views and Issues, 51–72. (Studies in Language Companion Series 119). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Trousdale, Graeme 2012. ‘Grammaticalization, Constructions, and the Grammaticalization of Constructions’. In: Davidse, Kristin, Breban, Tine, Brems, Lieselotte, and Mortelmans, Tanja (eds.). Grammaticalization and Language Change: New Reflections, 167–98. (Studies in Language Companion Series 130). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Trousdale, Graeme 2013. ‘Multiple Inheritance and Constructional Change’. In: De Smet, Hendrik, Ghesquière, Lobke, and Van de Velde, Freek (eds.). Multiple Source Constructions in Language Change. Special issue of Studies in Language 37(3), 491–514.
Trudgill, Peter. 2002. Sociolinguistic Variation and Change. Washington DC:Georgetown University Press.
Trudgill, Peter and Hannah, Jean 2008 [1982]. International English. A Guide to the Varieties of Standard English. 5th edn. London: Hodder Education.
Trudgill, Peter, Nevalainen, Terttu, and Wischer, Ilse. 2002. ‘Dynamic Have in North American and British Isles English’. English Language and Linguistics 6(1), 1–15.
Urmson, James O. 1952. ‘Parenthetical Verbs’. Mind 61, 480–96.
Van Bogaert, Julie. 2010. ‘A Constructional Taxonomy of I think and Related Expressions: Accounting for the Variability of Complement-taking Mental Predicates’. English Language and Linguistics 14(3), 399–427.
Van der Auwera, Johan, Dobrushina, Nina, and Goussev, Valentin. 2005. ‘Imperative-Hortative Systems’. In: Haspelmath, Martin, Dryer, Matthew S., Gil, David, and Comrie, Bernard (eds.). The World Atlas of Language Structures, 294–95. OxfordUniversity Press.
Van de Velde, Freek. 2011. ‘Left-peripheral Expansion of the English NP’. English Language and Linguistics 15(2), 387–415.
Van Valin, Robert D. 1999. ‘Functional Relations’. In: Brown, Keith and Miller, Jim (eds.). Concise Encyclopedia of Grammatical Categories, 150–62. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Visser, Frederikus Theodorus. 1963–73. An Historical Syntax of the English Language. 3 vols. Leiden: Brill.
Visser, Frederikus Theodorus 1973. An Historical Syntax of the English Language. Part iii, 2nd Half: Syntactical Units with Two and with More Verbs. Leiden: Brill.
Vogt, Helmut. 2002. ‘Semantische Unterschiede zwischen komplexen Verbalfügungen vom Typ give/have/take a look und ihren einfachen Verbentsprechungen’. In: Rapp, Reinhard (ed.). Sprachwissenschaft auf dem Weg in das Dritte Jahrtausend. Akten des 34. Linguistischen Kolloquiums in Germersheim 1999, 237–44. Bern: Lang.
Vosberg, Uwe. 2003. ‘The Role of Extractions and Horror Aequi in the Evolution of –ing Complements in Modern English’. In: Rohdenburg, Günter and Mondorf, Britta (eds.). Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English, 329–45. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Vosberg, Uwe 2006. Die große Komplementverschiebung. Außersemantische Einflüsse auf die Entwicklung satzwertiger Ergänzungen im Neuenglischen. Tübingen: Narr.
Vries, Mark de. 2007. ‘Invisible Constituents? Parentheses as B-merged Adverbial Phrases’. In: Dehé, Nicole and Kavalova, Yordanka (eds.). Parentheticals, 203–34. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Walshe, Shane. 2009. Irish English as Represented in Film. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
Walshe, Shane 2011. ‘‘Normal people like us don’t use that type of language. Remember this is the real world’. The Language of Father Ted: Representations of Irish English in a Fictional World’. In: Amador-Moreno, Carolina P. and McCafferty, Kevin (eds.). Fictionalising Orality. Special issue of Sociolinguistic Studies 5(1),127–48.
Warner, Anthony. 1982. Complementation in Middle English and the Methodology of Historical Syntax. Pennsylvania State University Press.
Wekker, Herman Ch. 1976. The Expression of Future Time in Contemporary British English: An Investigation into the Syntax and Semantics of Five Verbal Constructions Expressing Futurity. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Wells, William H. 1847. A Grammar of the English Language; For the Use of Schools. Andover: Allen, Morrill, and Wardwell; and Boston: John P. Jewett & Co. [First published 1846].
Westergren Axelsson, Margareta. 1998. Contraction in British Newspapers in the Late 20th Century. Uppsala University Press.
Westin, Ingrid. 2002. Language Change in English Newspaper Editorials (Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics 44.) Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Wichmann, Anne. 2004. ‘The Intonation of Please-requests: A Corpus-based Study’. Journal of Pragmatics 36(9), 1521–49.
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1988. The Semantics of Grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Wierzbicka, Anna 2006. English: Meaning and Culture. Oxford University Press.
Wischer, Ilse. 2000. ‘Grammaticalization Versus Lexicalization: Methinks There is Some Confusion’. In: Fischer, Olga, Rosenbach, Anette, and Stein, Dieter (eds.). Pathways of Change. Grammaticalization in English, 355–70. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Wolk, Christoph, Bresnan, Joan, Rosenbach, Anette, and Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2013. ‘Dative and Genitive Variability in Late Modern English: Exploring Cross-constructional Variation and Change’. Diachronica 30(3): 382–419.
Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria. 2011. ‘ARCHER Past and Present (1990–2010)’. ICAME Journal 35, 205–36.
Zaenen, Annie, Carlette, Jean, Garretson, Gregory, Bresnan, Joan, Koontz-Garboden, Andrew, Nikitina, Tatiana, O’Connor, M. Catherine, and Wasow, Tom. 2004. ‘Animacy Encoding in English: Why and How’. In: Byron, Donna and Webber, Bonnie (eds.). Proceedings of the 2004 ACL Workshop on Discourse Annotation, Barcelona, July 2004, 118–25.
Zwicky, Arnold M. 1987. ‘Suppressing the Zs’. Journal of Linguistics 23(1), 133–48.
