Abbott, Barbara. 2000. Presuppositions as nonassertions. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1419–1437.
Abbott, Barbara.2004. Definiteness and indefiniteness. In Horn, Laurence R. and Ward, Gregory, eds., Handbook of pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell, 122–149.
Akatsuka, Noriko. 1986. Conditionals are discourse-bound. In Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, Meulen, Alice, Reilly, Judy Snitzer, and Ferguson, Charles A., eds., On conditionals. Cambridge: Cambridge Univeristy Press, 333–351.
Akhtar, Nameera. 1998. Characterizing English-speaking children's understanding of SVO word order. In Clark, Eve V., ed., Proceedings of the 29th Annual Child Language Research Forum. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 161–169.
Ansaldo, Umberto. 1999. Comparative constructions in Sinitic: Areal typology and patterns of grammaticalization. PhD dissertation, Department of linguistics, Stockholm University.
Ariel, Mira. 1983. Linguistic marking of social prominence: The Hebrew mi she introducer. Journal of Pragmatics 7: 389–409.
Ariel, Mira.1985. Givenness marking. PhD dissertation, Tel Aviv University.
Ariel, Mira.1987. Reflexives and reciprocals. Unpublished MS, Tel Aviv University.
Ariel, Mira.1990. Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. London: Routledge.
Ariel, Mira.1991. The function of accessibility in a theory of grammar. Journal of Pragmatics 16: 443–463.
Ariel, Mira.1994. Interpreting anaphoric expressions: A cognitive versus a pragmatic approach. Journal of Linguistics 30: 3–42.
Ariel, Mira.1996. Referring expressions and the +/− coreference distinction. In Fretheim, Thorstein and Gundel, Jeanette K., eds., Reference and referent accessibility (Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 13–35.
Ariel, Mira.1998a. The linguistic status of the “here and now.”Cognitive Linguistics 9: 189–237.
Ariel, Mira.1998b. Three grammaticalization paths for the development of person verbal agreement in Hebrew. In Koenig, Jean-Pierre, ed., Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 93–111.
Ariel, Mira.1998c. Discourse markers and form-function correlations. In Jucker, Andreas H. and Ziv, Yael, eds., Discourse markers: Descriptions and theory (Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 57). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 223–259.
Ariel, Mira.1999a. Cognitive universals and linguistic conventions: The case of resumptive pronouns. Studies in Language 23: 217–269.
Ariel, Mira.1999b. Mapping so-called “pragmatic” phenomena according to a “linguistic–extralinguistic” distinction: The case of propositions marked “accessible”. In Darnell, Michael, Moravcsik, Edith A., Newmeyer, Frederick, Noonan, Michael, and Wheatley, Kathleen M., eds., Functionalism and formalism in linguistics, vol. 2: Case studies (Studies in Language Companion Series 41). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 11–38.
Ariel, Mira.2000. The development of person agreement markers: From pronouns to higher accessibility markers. In Barlow, Michael and Kemmer, Suzanne, eds., Usage-based models of language. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 197–260.
Ariel, Mira.2001. Accessibility theory: An overview. In Sanders, Ted, Schilperoord, Joost, and Spooren, Wilbert, eds., Text representation: Linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 29–87.
Ariel, Mira.2002a. The demise of a unique concept of literal meaning. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 361–402.
Ariel, Mira.2002b. Privileged Interactional Interpretations. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 1003–1044.
Ariel, Mira.2002c. The possessive NP construction: Discourse function and discourse profile. In Berkeley Linguistics Society 28. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, 15–26.
Ariel, Mira.2003. Does most mean ‘more than half’? In Berkeley Linguistics Society 29. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, 17–30.
Ariel, Mira.2004a. Accessibility marking: Discourse functions, discourse profiles, and processing cues. Discourse Processes 37: 91–116.
Ariel, Mira.2004b. Most. Language 80: 658–706.
Ariel, Mira.2006a. The making of a construction: From reflexive marking to lower transitivity. Unpublished MS, Tel Aviv University.
Ariel, Mira.2006b. A ‘just that’ lexical meaning for most. In Heusinger, Klaus and Turner, Ken, eds., Where semantics meets pragmatics (Current Research in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface). London: Elsevier, 49–91.
Ariel, Mira.2007a. Relational and independent strategies in interpreting and conjunctions. Unpublished MS, Tel Aviv University.
Ariel, Mira.2007b. Xaval al ha-zman: On the role of explicatures in semanticization. Unpublished MS, Tel Aviv University.
Ariel, Mira.2007c. A grammar in every register? The case of definite descriptions. In Hedberg, Nancy and Zacharsky, Ron, eds., The grammar–pragmatics interface: Essays in honor of Jeanette K. Gundel. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 265–292.
Ariel, Mira.Forthcoming. Defining pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Arnold, Jennifer, Wasow, Thomas, Losongco, Anthony, and Ginstrom, Ryan. 2000. Heaviness versus newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering. Language 76: 28–55.
Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Aronoff, Mark.1987. Review article of Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form by Joan L. Bybee. Language 63: 115–129.
Aronoff, Mark.1997. Gender as unnatural grammar. Paper presented at the Haifa University English Department colloquium, Haifa, June 4, 1997.
Aslin, Richard N., Saffran, Jenny R., and Newport, Elissa L.. 1999. Statistical learning in linguistic and nonlinguistic domains. In MacWhinney, Brian, ed., The emergence of language. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 359–380.
Atlas, Jay David. 1975. Frege's polymorphous concept of presupposition and its role in a theory of meaning. Semantikos 1: 29–44.
Atlas, Jay David.1977. Negation, ambiguity, and presupposition. Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 321–336.
Atlas, Jay David.2004. Presupposition. In Horn, Laurence R. and Ward, Gregory, eds., Handbook of pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell, 29–52.
Atlas, Jay David and Levinson, Stephen C.. 1981. It-clefts, informativeness, and logical form: Radical pragmatics (revised standard version). In Cole, Peter, ed., Radical pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 1–61.
Bach, Kent. 1994. Conversational impliciture. Mind and Language 9: 124–162.
Bach, Kent.1999. The myth of conventional implicature. Linguistics and Philosophy 22: 327–366.
Bach, Kent.2000. Quantification, qualification and context: A reply to Stanley and Szabo. Mind and Language 15: 262–283.
Bach, Kent.2001. You don't say? Synthese 128: 15–44.
Bach, Kent.2002. Semantic, pragmatic. In Cambell, Joseph Keim, O'Rourke, Michael, and Shier, David, eds., Meaning and truth. New York: Seven Bridges Press, 284–292.
Bach, Kent.2004a. Pragmatics and the philosophy of language. In Horn, Laurence R. and Ward, Gregory, eds., Handbook of pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell, 463–487.
Bach, Kent.2004b. Minding the gap. In Bianchi, Claudia, ed., The semantics/pragmatics distinction. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 27–43.
Bach, Kent.2006. The top 10 misconceptions about implicature. In Birner, Betty J. and Ward, Gregory, eds., Drawing the boundaries of meaning: Neo-Gricean studies in pragmatics and semantics in honor of Laurence R. Horn. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 21–30.
Baker, C. L. 1995. Contrast, discourse prominence, and intensification, with special reference to locally free reflexives in British English. Language 71: 63–101.
Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua. 1971. Out of the pragmatic wastebasket. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 401–407.
Bar-Lev, Zev and Palacas, Arthur. 1980. Semantic command over pragmatic priority. Lingua 51: 137–146.
Bardenstein, Ruti. 2005. The pragmatics of diminutive quantifiers in Modern Hebrew. MA Thesis, Linguistics, Tel Aviv University.
Barwise, Jon and Perry, John. 1983. Situations and attitudes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bates, Elizabeth. 2001. Class notes from “Psycholinguistics: A cross-language perspective.” LSA summer school, UC Santa Barbara.
Bates, Elizabeth and Goodman, Judith C.. 1997. On the inseparability of grammar and the lexicon: Evidence from acquisition, aphasia and real-time processing. Language and Cognitive Processes 12: 507–584.
Bates, Elizabeth and Goodman, Judith C..1999. On the emergence of grammar from the lexicon. In MacWhinney, Brian, ed., The emergence of language. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 29–79.
Bates, Elizabeth and MacWhinney, Brian. 1982. A functionalist approach to grammatical development. In Wanner, Eric and Gleitman, Leila, eds., Language acquisition: The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge Univeristy Press.
Bates, Elizabeth and MacWhinney, Brian.1989. Functionalism and the competition model. In MacWhinney, Brian and Bates, Elizabeth, eds., The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–73.
Bazerman, Charles. 1988. Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Bendavid, Abba. 1971. Biblical Hebrew and Mishnaic Hebrew, vol. 2. Jerusalem: Dvir.
Berg, Jonathan. 1993. Literal meaning and context. Iyyun 42: 397–411.
Berg, Jonathan.2002. Is semantics still possible? Journal of Pragmatics 34: 349–359.
Berkenfield, Catie. 2001. The role of frequency in the realization of English that. In Bybee, Joan L. and Hopper, Paul J., eds., Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (Typological Studies in Language 45). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 281–307.
Berlin, Adele, Brettler, Marc Zvi and Fishbane, Michael, eds. 2004. The Jewish study Bible. New York: Oxford University Press.
Berman, Ruth A. and Armon-Lotem, Sharon. 1996. How grammatical are early verbs? In Martinot, C., ed., Annales Littéraires de l'Université de Franche-Comté: Actes du Colloque International sur l'Acquisition de la syntaxe, 17–56.
Bezuidenhout, Anne and Cutting, J. Cooper. 2002. Literal meaning, minimal propositions, and pragmatic processing. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 433–456.
Biber, Douglas. 1995. Dimensions of register variation: A cross-linguistic comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan, and Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow, Essex: Longman.
Birner, Betty J. 1994. Information status and word order: An analysis of English inversion. Language 70: 233–259.
Birner, Betty J. and Ward, Gregory L.. 1998. Information status and noncanonical word order in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Blakemore, Diane. 1987. Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.
Blakemore, Diane and Carston, Robyn. 2005. The pragmatics of sentential coordination with and. Lingua 115: 569–589.
Bock, Kathryn J. 1986. Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology 18: 355–387.
Bock, Kathryn J. and Griffin, Zenzi M.. 2000. The persistence of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 129: 177–192.
Bock, Kathryn J. and Kroch, Anthony S.. 1989. The isolability of syntactic processing. In Carlson, Greg N. and Tanenhaus, Michael K., eds., Linguistic structure in language processing (Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics). Dordrecht: Kluwer, 157–196.
Bock, Kathryn J. and Loebell, Helga. 1990. Framing sentences. Cognition 5: 1–39.
Bod, Rens. 1998. Beyond grammar: An experience-based theory of language (CSLI Lecture Notes 88). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Bod, Rens.2005. Exemplar-based syntax. Paper presented at the 2005 LSA meeting, Oakland, CA.
Bod, Rens.2006. Exemplar-based syntax: How to get productivity from examples? The Linguistic Review, special issue: Exemplar-based models of language, 23: 291–320.
Bod, Rens, Hay, Jennifer, and Jannedy, Stefanie. 2003a. Introduction. In Bod, Rens, Hay, Jennifer, and Jannedy, Stefanie, eds., Probabilistic linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1–10.
Bod, Rens, Hay, Jennifer and Jannedy, Stefanie.eds., 2003b. Probabilistic linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bolinger, Dwight L. 1972. That's that. The Hague: Mouton.
Bolinger, Dwight L. 1985. Two views of accent. Journal of Linguistics 21: 79–123.
Bolinger, Dwight L. 1989. Intonation and its uses: Melody in grammar and discourse. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Borg, Emma. 2005a. Saying what you mean: Unarticulated constituents and communication. In Elugardo, Reinaldo and Stainton, Robert J., eds., Ellipsis and nonsentential speech. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 237–262.
Borg, Emma.2005b. Pragmatic determinants of what is said. In Brown, Keith, ed., Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 2nd edition. Oxford: Elsevier, 737–740.
Borochovsky Bar-Abba, Esther. 2006. From speaking to the newspaper – an examination of parallel texts (in Hebrew). In Ben-Shahar, Rina and Toury, Gideon, eds., Hebrew – a living language. Tel Aviv: The Porter Institute and Ha-Kibbutz Ha-Meuchad, 7–32.
Boroditsky, Lera. 2000. Metaphoric structuring: understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition 75: 1–28.
Bowerman, Melissa. 1996. The origins of children's spatial semantic categories: Cognitive versus linguistic determinants. In Gumperz, John and Levinson, Stephen, eds., Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 145–176.
Boyland, Joyce Tang T., and Anderson, John R.. 1998. Evidence that syntactic priming is long-lasting. In Gernsbacher, Morton Ann and Derry, Sharon J., eds., Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Branigan, Holly P., Pickering, Martin J., and Cleland, Alexander A.. 2000. Syntactic coordination in dialogue. Cognition 75: B13–B25.
Branigan, Holly P., Pickering, Martin J., Stewart, Andrew J., and McLean, Janet F.. 2000. Syntactic priming in spoken production: Linguistic and temporal interference. Memory and Cognition 28: 1297–1302.
Bresnan, Joan. 2006. Is syntactic knowledge probabilistic? Experiments with the English dative alternation. Paper presented at International conference on linguistic evidence, Tübingen.
Bresnan, Joan and Hay, Jennifer. To appear. Gradient grammar: An effect of animacy on the syntax of give in New Zealand and American English. Lingua, special issue: Animacy.
Bresnan, Joan, Cueni, Anna, Nikitina, Tatiana and Baayen, R. Harald. 2007. Predicting the dative alternation. In Boume, Gerlof, Krämer, Irene, and Zwarts, Joost, eds., Cognitive foundations of interpretation. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Science, 69–94.
Brinton, Laurel J. and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2005. Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burton-Roberts, Noel. 2005. Robyn Carston on semantics, pragmatics and “encoding.”Journal of Linguistics 41: 389–407.
Bybee, Joan. 1985a. Diagrammatic iconicity in stem-inflection relations. In Haiman, John, ed., Iconicity in syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 11–49.
Bybee, Joan L. 1985b. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form (Typological Studies in Language 9). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bybee, Joan L. 1988. Semantic substance vs. contrast in the development of grammatical meaning. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, 247–264.
Bybee, Joan L. 1998. The emergent lexicon. In Gruber, M. C., Higgins, D., Olson, K. S., and Wysocki, T., eds., Chicago Linguistic Society 34(2): The Panels. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 421–435.
Bybee, Joan L. 2000. The phonology of the lexicon: Evidence from lexical diffusion. In Barlow, Michael and Kemmer, Suzanne, eds., Usage-based models of language. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 65–85.
Bybee, Joan L. 2001. Phonology and language use (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 94). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bybee, Joan L. 2002. Sequentiality as the basis of constituent structure. In Givón, Talmy and Malle, Bertram F., eds., The evolution of language out of pre-language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 109–134.
Bybee, Joan L. 2003a. Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of repetition. In Janda, Richard and Joseph, Brian D., eds., Handbook of historical linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 602–623.
Bybee, Joan L. 2003b. Cognitive processes in grammaticalization. In Tomasello, Michael, ed., The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, vol. 2. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 145–167.
Bybee, Joan L. 2005. The impact of use on representation: Grammar is usage and usage is grammar. Presidential address at the 2005 LSA meeting, Oakland, CA.
Bybee, Joan L. and Hopper, Paul J., eds. 2001a. Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure(Typological Studies in Language 45). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bybee, Joan L. and Hopper, Paul J. 2001b. Introduction to frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. In Bybee, Joan L. and Hopper, Paul J., eds., Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (Typological Studies in Language 45). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1–20.
Bybee, Joan L. and Pagliuca, William. 1985. Cross-linguistic comparison and the development of grammatical meaning. In Fisiak, Jacek, ed., Historical semantics: Historical word formation. Berlin: de Gruyter, 59–83.
Bybee, Joan L. and Scheibman, Joanne. 1999. The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: The reduction of don't in English. Linguistics 37: 575–596.
Bybee, Joan L., Perkins, Revere D. and Pagliuca, William. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cappelen, Herman and Lepore, Ernest. 2005. Insensitive semantics: A defense of semantic minimalism and speech act pluralism. Oxford: Blackwell.
Carden, Guy and Stewart, William A.. 1988. Binding theory, bioprogram, and creolization: Evidence from Haitian Creole. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 3: 1–67.
Carrel, Patricia L. and Richter, Gabriela. 1981. On presuppositions and speaker-beliefs. Papers in Linguistics: International Journal of Human Communication 14: 47–69.
Carston, Robyn. 1984. Semantic and pragmatic analyses of and. Paper presented at the Linguistic Association of Great Britain, April 1984.
Carston, Robyn.1988. Implicature, explicature and truth-theoretic semantics. In Kempson, Ruth M., ed., Mental representations: The interface between language and reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 155–181. (Reprinted in Kasher, ed., 1998, vol. 4: 436–479.)
Carston, Robyn.1990. Quantity maxims and generalised implicature. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 2:1–31. (Reprinted in Lingua 96:213–244.)
Carston, Robyn.1993. Conjunction, explanation and Relevance. Lingua 90: 27–48.
Carston, Robyn.1998a. Pragmatics and the explicit-implicit distinction. PhD dissertation, University of London.
Carston, Robyn.1998b. Negation, “presupposition” and the semantics/pragmatics distinction. Journal of Linguistics 34: 309–350.
Carston, Robyn.1999. Negation, “presupposition” and metarepresentation: A response to Noel Burton-Roberts. Journal of Linguistics 35: 365–389.
Carston, Robyn.2002a. Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell.
Carston, Robyn.2002b. Linguistic meaning, communicated meaning and cognitive pragmatics. Mind and Language 17: 127–148.
Carston, Robyn.2004a. Truth-conditional content and conversational implicature. In Bianchi, Claudia, ed., The semantics/pragmatics distinction. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 65–100.
Carston, Robyn.2004b. Explicature and semantics. In Davis, Steven and Gillon, Brendan, eds., Semantics: A reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 817–845.
Chafe, Wallace L. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In Li, Charles N., ed., Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press, 25–55.
Chafe, Wallace L. 1982. Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. In Tannen, Deborah, ed., Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy (Advances in Discourse Processes 9). Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 35–53.
Chafe, Wallace L. 1988. Linking intonation units in spoken English. In Haiman, John and Thompson, Sandra A., eds., Clause combining in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1–27.
Chafe, Wallace L. 1994. Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of consciousness experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Chafe, Wallace L. and Danielewicz, Jane. 1987. Properties of spoken and written language. In Horowitz, Rosalind and Samuels, S. Jay, eds., Comprehending oral and written language. New York: Academic Press, 83–113.
Chang, Franklin, Dell, Gary S., Bock, Kathryn J., and Griffin, Zenzi M.. 2000. Structural priming as implicit learning: A comparison of models of sentence production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 29: 217–229.
Chierchia, Gennaro and McConnell-Ginet, Sally. 1990. Meaning and grammar: An introduction to semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam.1972. Language and mind. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Chomsky, Noam.1981. Lectures on government and binding: The Pisa lectures. Dordrecht: Foris.
Chomsky, Noam.2001. Beyond explanatory adequacy (MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 20) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Choueka, Yaakov. 1997. Rav-Milim: A comprehensive dictionary of Modern Hebrew. Tel Aviv: C.E.T and Miskal.
Cifuentes-Férez, Paula and Gentner, Dedre. 2006. Naming motion events in Spanish and English. Cognitive Linguistics 17: 443–462.
Clancy, Patricia M. 1980. Referential choice in English and Japanese narrative discourse. In Chafe, Wallace, ed., The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production, vol. 3. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 127–202.
Clancy, Patricia M. 1989. Form and function in the acquisition of Korean wh- questions. Journal of Child Language 16: 323–347.
Clancy, Patricia M.in press. Discourse-functional correlates of argument structure in Korean acquisition. In McGloin, Naomi, ed., Japanese/Korean linguistics, 15. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 1–20.
Clark, Eve V. and Clark, Herbert H.. 1979. When nouns surface as verbs. Language 55: 767–811.
Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, Herbert H. 1998. Communal lexicons. In Malmkjaer, Kirsten and Williams, John, eds., Context in language learning and language understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 63–87.
Clark, Herbert H. and Marshall, Catherine R.. 1981. Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In Joshi, Aravind K., Webber, Bonnie L., and Sag, Ivan A., eds., Elements of discourse understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 10–63.
Clark, Herbert H. and Wilkes-Gibbs, Deanna. 1986. Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition 22: 1–39.
Claudi, Ulrike and Heine, Bernd. 1986. On the metaphorical base of grammar. Studies in language 10: 297–335.
Clausner, Timothy, Rapp, Brends, and Su, Yi-ching. 1996. Does frequency determine the storage of compounds? Evidence from Chinese. Poster presented at the 18th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society '96, La Jolla, CA.
Cohen, Dana. 2004. Intensive reflexives – from sentence to discourse. PhD dissertation, the Hebrew University in Jerusalem.
Cohen, Jonathan L. 1971. Some remarks on Grice's view about the logical particles of natural language. In Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua, ed., Pragmatics of natural languages. Dordrecht: Reidel, 50–68.
Cohen, Uriel. 2005. Acceptance of gapped sentences where verbs are adapted differently. Tel Aviv University seminar paper.
Cole, Peter. 1981. Preface. In Cole, Peter, ed., Radical pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, xi–xiv.
Coleman, Linda and Kay, Paul. 1981. Prototype semantics: The English word lie. Language 57: 26–44.
Comrie, Bernard. 1978. Ergativity. In Lehmann, Winfred P., ed., Syntactic typology: Studies in the phenomenology of language. Austin: University of Texas Press, 329–394.
Comrie, Bernard. 1980. Language typology and linguistic universals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Comrie, Bernard.1983. Form and function in explaining language universals. Linguistics 21: 87–103.
Comrie, Bernard.1988. Topics, grammaticalized topics, and subjects. In Berkeley Linguistics Society 14. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, 265–279.
Comrie, Bernard.1994a. Language universals and linguistic typology: Data-bases and explanations. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 46: 3–14.
Comrie, Bernard.1994b. Coreference: Between grammar and discourse. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual Meeting of the Kansai Linguistic Society (1993), 1–10.
Comrie, Bernard.1997. Pragmatic binding: Demonstratives as anaphors in Dutch. In Berkeley Linguistics Society 23. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, 50–61.
Comrie, Bernard.1998. Reference-tracking: description and explanation. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 51: 335–346.
Comrie, Bernard. 2003. On explaining language universals. In Tomasello, Michael, ed., The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, vol. 2. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 195–209.
Comrie, Bernard and Kuteva, Tania. 2005a. Relativization strategies. In Haspelmath, Martin, Dryer, Matthew S., Gil, David, and Comrie, Bernard, eds., The world atlas of language structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 494–501.
Comrie, Bernard and Kuteva, Tania.2005b. The evolution of grammatical structures and “functional need” explanations. In Tallerman, Maggie, ed., Language origins: Perspectives on evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 185–207.
Cooper, William E. and Ross, John Robert. 1975. Word order. In Grossman, Robin E., San, L. James and Vance, Timothy J., eds., Chicago Linguistic Society: Papers from the parasession on functionalism. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 63–111.
Craig, Colette G. 1991. Ways to go in Rama: A case study in polygrammaticalization. In Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Heine, Bernd, eds., Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. 2: Focus on types of grammatical markers (Typological Studies in Language 19:1, 19:2). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 455–492.
Croft, William. 1990/2003. Typology and universals (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Croft, William.1991. Syntactic categories and grammatical relations. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Croft, William.1993a. A noun is a noun is a noun – or is it? Some reflections on the universality of semantics. In Berkeley Linguistics Society 19. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, 369–380.
Croft, William.1993b. Functional-typological theory in its historical and intellectual context. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 46: 15–26.
Croft, William.2000. Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. Harlow: Longman.
Croft, William, Shyldkrot, Hava Bat-Zeev and Kemmer, Suzanne. 1987. Diachronic semantic processes in the Middle Voice. In Ramat, Anna Giacalone, Carruba, Onofrio, and Bernini, Giuliano, eds., Papers from the 7th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 179–192.
Dahl, Östen. 2001. Inflationary effects in language and elsewhere. In Bybee, Joan L. and Hopper, Paul J., eds., Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (Typological Studies in Language 45). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 471–480.
Deane, Paul D. 1992. Grammar in mind and brain. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Delong, Katherine A., Urbach, Thomas P., and Kutas, Marta. 2005. Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience 8: 1117–1121.
Guy, Deutscher. 2005. The unfolding of language. London: William Heinemann.
Diderot, D. 1751/1875. Lettre sur les Sourds et muets. Oeuvres complètes de Diderot, vol I. Paris: Garnier Frères.
Dik, Simon C. 1986. On the notion “functional explanation.”Belgian Journal of Linguistics 1: 11–52.
Dixon, Robert M. W. 1979. Ergativity. Language 55: 59–138.
Dixon, Robert M. W. 1982. Where have all the adjectives gone? Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Dixon, Robert M. W. 1988. A grammar of Boumaa Fijian. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dixon, Robert M. W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Donohue, Mark. 2006. Argument structure and adjuncts: Perspectives from Northern New Guinea. Paper presented at Berkeley Linguistics Society 32, Berkeley.
Dowty, David. 2003. The dual analysis of adjuncts/complements in categorial grammar. In Lang, Ewald, Maienborn, Claudia, and Fabricius-Hansen, Cathrine, eds., Modifying adjuncts. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Du Bois, John W. 1974. Syntax in mid-sentence. In Berkeley studies in syntax and semantics, vol. 1. Berkeley: Department of Linguistics and Institute of Human Learning, University of California, III-1–III-25.
Du Bois, John W. 1980. Beyond definiteness: The trace of identity in discourse. In Chafe, Wallace L., ed., The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 203–274.
Du Bois, John W. 1985. Competing motivations. In Haiman, John, ed., Iconicity in syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 343–365.
Du Bois, John W. 1987. The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63: 805–855.
Du Bois, John W. 1998. Reference and identification: Definiteness from a discourse point of view. Talk given at Tel Aviv University colloquium, Dec. 29, 1998.
Du Bois, John W. 2003a. Argument structure: Grammar in use. In Du Bois, John W., Kumpf, Lorraine E., and Ashby, William J., eds., Preferred argument structure: Grammar as architecture for function. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 11–60.
Du Bois, John W. 2003b. Discourse and grammar. In Tomasello, Michael, ed., The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, vol. 2. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 47–87.
Du Bois, John W. 2004. Dialogic syntax: The syntax of engagement. Talk given at the Linguistics Dept. Tel Aviv University, Jan. 22, 2004.
Du Bois, John W. 2007. The stance triangle. In Englebretson, Robert, ed., Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 139–182.
Du Bois, John W. and Engelbretson, Robert. 2004. Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part 3. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
Du Bois, John W. and Engelbretson, Robert.2005. Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part 4. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
Du Bois, John W., Chafe, Wallace L., Meyer, Charles, and Thompson, Sandra A.. 2000. Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part 1. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
Du Bois, John W., Chafe, Wallace L., Meyer, Charles, Thompson, Sandra A., and Martey, Nii. 2003. Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part 2. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium. University of Pennsylvania.
Du Bois, John W., Kumpf, Lorraine E., and Ashby, William J., eds. 2003. Preferred argument structure: Grammar as architecture for function. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ducrot, Oswald. 1972. Dire et ne pas dire: Principes de semantique linguistique. Paris: Hermann.
Duranti, Alessandro. 1997 Linguistic anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Durie, Mark. 1995a. Towards an understanding of linguistic evolution and the notion “X has a function Y.” In Abraham, Werner, Givón, Talmy, and Thompson, Sandra A., eds., Discourse grammar and typology (Studies in Language Companion Series 27). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 275–308.
Durie, Mark. 1995b. Language, function and time. MS, University of Melbourne.
Eisenberg, Dana. 2005. Anaphoric expressions and the semantics of and conjunctions. Seminar paper, Tel Aviv University.
Elman, Jeffrey L. 2001. Connectionism and language acquisition. In Tomasello, Michael and Bates, Elizabeth, eds., Language development: The essential readings (Essential Readings in Developmental Psychology). Oxford: Blackwell, 295–306.
Engelbretson, Robert ed. 2007. Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Erman, Britt and Warren, Beatrice. 2000. The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text 20: 29–62.
Ernestus, Mirjam. 2005. Systematic analogical effects in regular past tense production in Dutch: Adult production and children's acquisition. Paper delivered at the 2005 LSA meeting, Oakland, CA.
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi and Lappin, Shalom. 1979. Dominance and the functional explanation of island phenomena. Theoretical Linguistics 6: 41–85.
Even Shoshan, Avraham. 1982. The new dictionary (Hebrew). Jerusalem: Kiryat Sefer.
Faltz, Leonard M. 1977/1985. Reflexivization: A study in universal syntax. New York: Garland.
Farmer, Ann Kathleen. 1980. On the interaction of morphology and syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Farmer, Ann Kathleen.1984. Modularity in syntax: A study of Japanese and English (Current Studies in Linguistics 9). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Farr, J. M. 1905. Intensives and reflexives in Anglo-Saxon and Early Middle English. Baltimore: J. H. Furst.
Firth, John Rupert. 1957. A synopsis of linguistic theory 1930–1955. In Firth, John Rupert, ed., Studies in linguistic analysis: Special volume of the Philological Society. Oxford: Blackwell, 1–32.
Fischer, Olga C. M. 2003. Principles of grammaticalization and linguistic reality. In Rohdenburg, Günter and Mondorf, Britta, eds., Determinants of grammatical variation in English (Topics in English Linguistics 43). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 445–478.
Foley, William and Robert, D.Valin, Jr. 1984. Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ford, Cecilia E. 1993. Grammar in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fox, Barbara A. 1987. The noun phrase accessibility hierarchy reinterpreted: Subject primacy or the absolutive hypothesis?Language 63: 856–870.
Frazier, Lyn. 1985. Syntactic complexity. In Dowty, David R., Karttunen, Lauri, and Zwicky, Arnold M., eds., Natural language parsing: Psychological, computational, and theoretical perspectives (Studies in Natural Language Processing 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 129–189.
Frazier, Lyn.1990. Exploring the architecture of the language-processing system. In Altmann, Gerry T. M., ed., Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives (ACL–MIT Press Series in Natural Language Processing). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books, 409–433.
Frege, Gottlob. 1892. On sense and reference. In Geach, Peter and Black, Max, eds., Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege, 1952. Oxford: Blackwell, 56–78.
Gahl, Susanne and Garnsey, Susan. 2004. Knowledge of grammar, knowledge of usage: Syntactic probabilities affect pronunciation variation. Language 80: 748–755.
Gamut, L. T. F. 1991. Logic, language, and meaning, vol. 1: Introduction to logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Garrod, Simon and Anderson, Anthony. 1987. Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic coordination. Cognition 27: 181–218.
Gast, Volker. 2006. The grammar of identity: Intensifiers and reflexives in Germanic languages. London: Routledge.
Gazdar, Gerald. 1979a. Pragmatics: Implicature, presupposition, and logical form. New York: Academic Press.
Gazdar, Gerald. 1979b. A solution to the projection problem. In Oh, Chooh-Kyr and Dinneen, David A., eds., Syntax and semantics, vol. 11: Presupposition. New York: Academic Press. 57–89.
Geeraerts, Dirk and Grondelaers, Stefan. 1995. Looking back at anger: Cultural traditions and metaphorical patterns. In Maclaury, Robert E. and Taylor, John R., eds., Language and the cognitive construal of the world. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 153–180.
Geis, Michael L. and Zwicky, Arnold M.. 1971. On invited inferences. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 561–566.
Geluykens, Ronald. 1992. From discourse process to grammatical construction: On left dislocation in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gernsbacher, Morton Ann and Shroyer, Suzanne. 1989. The cataphoric use of the indefinite this in spoken narratives. Memory and Cognition 17: 536–540.
Giacalone, Ramat Anna and Hopper, Paul J.. 1998. Introduction. In Ramat, Anna Giacalone and Hopper, Paul J., eds., The limits of grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1–11.
Gibbs, Raymond W. 2004. Psycholinguistic experiments and linguistics–pragmatics. In Noveck, Ira A. and Sperber, Dan, eds., Experimental pragmatics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 172–186.
Gibbs, Raymond W. and Moise, Jessica F.. 1997. Pragmatics in understanding what is said. Cognition 62: 51–74.
Giora, Rachel. 1997. Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics 8: 183–206.
Giora, Rachel 2003. On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language. New York: Oxford University Press.
Givón, Talmy. 1976. Topic, pronoun and grammatical agreement. In Li, Charles N., ed., Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press, 149–188.
Givón, Talmy.ed. 1979a. Discourse and syntax. New York: Academic Press.
Givón, Talmy.1979b. On understanding grammar (Perspectives in Neurolinguistics and Psycholinguistics). New York: Academic Press.
Givón, Talmy.ed. 1983. Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Givón, Talmy.1984. Syntax: A functional-typological introduction, vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Givón, Talmy.1990. Syntax: A functional-typological introduction, vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Givón, Talmy.1991. Isomorphism in the grammatical code: Cognitive and biological considerations. Studies in Language 15: 85–114.
Givón, Talmy.1992. The grammar of referential coherence as mental processing instructions. Linguistics 30: 5–55.
Givón, Talmy.1993. English grammar: A function-based introduction, vols. 1 and 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Givón, Talmy.1999. Generativity and variation: The notion “rule of grammar” revisited. In MacWhinney, Brian, ed., The emergence of language. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 81–109.
Givón, Talmy.2002. Bio-linguistics: The Santa Barbara lectures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, Adele E. 2004. Pragmatics and argument structure. In Horn, Laurence R. and Ward, Gregory, eds., The Handbook of pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell, 427–441.
Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldberg, Adele E. and Jackendoff, Ray. 2004. The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language 80: 532–568.
Goldberg, Adele E., Casenhiser, Devin M., and Sethuraman, Nitya. 2004. Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics 15: 289–316.
Green, Mitchell S. 1995. Quantity, volubility, and some varieties of discourse. Linguistics and Philosophy 18: 83–112.
Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Cole, Peter and Morgan, Jerry L., eds., Syntax and semantics, vol. 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press, 41–58.
Grice, H. Paul. 1981. Presupposition and conversational implicature. In Cole, Peter, ed., Radical pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 183–198.
Grice, H. Paul. 1989. Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gries, Stefan Th. 2003. Towards a corpus-based indentification of prototypical instances of constructions. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 1: 1–28.
Gries, Stefan Th. 2005. Syntactic priming: A corpus-based approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 34: 365–399.
Gundel, Jeanette K., Hedberg, Nancy, and Zacharski, Ron. 1993. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69: 274–307.
Haiman, John. 1980. Dictionaries and encyclopedias. Lingua 50: 329–357.
Haiman, John.1983. Iconic and economic motivation. Language 59: 781–819.
Haiman, John.1985a. Natural syntax: Iconicity and erosion (Current Studies in Linguistics 44). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haiman, John.ed. 1985b. Iconicity in syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Haiman, John.1994. Ritualization and the development of language. In William, Pagliuca, ed., Perspectives on grammaticalization (Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science IV: Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 109). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 3–28.
Haiman, John.1998. Talk is cheap. New York: Oxford University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Hare, Mary and Jeffrey, L. Elman. 1995. Learning and morphological change. Cognition 56: 61–98.
Hare, Mary L., Ford, Michael, and Marslen-Wilson, William D.. 2001. Ambiguity and frequency effects in regular verb inflection. In Bybee, Joan L. and Hopper, Paul J., eds., Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (Typological Studies in Language 45). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 181–200.
Harnish, Robert M. and Farmer, Ann K.. 1984. Pragmatics and the modularity of the linguistic system. Lingua 63: 255–277.
Harris, Alice C. and Campbell, Lyle. 1995. Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haspelmath, Martin. 1999a. Explaining article-possessor complementarity: Economic motivation in noun phrase syntax. Language 75: 227–243.
Haspelmath, Martin.1999b. Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics 37: 1043–1068.
Haspelmath, Martin.2004a. Does linguistic explanation presuppose linguistic description? Studies in Language 28: 554–579.
Haspelmath, Martin.2004b. On directionality in language change with particular reference to grammaticalization. In Fischer, Olga, Norde, Muriel, and Perridon, Harry, eds., Up and down the cline: The nature of grammaticalization (Typological Studies in Language 59). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 17–44.
Haspelmath, Martin.2004c. A frequentist explanation of some universals of reflexive marking. Paper presented at the “Reciprocity and reflexivity – description, typology and theory workshop,” Free University of Berlin, October 2004.
Haspelmath, Martin.2006a. Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of linguistics 42: 25–70.
Haspelmath, Martin.2006b. A Review of Du Bois, John W., Kumpf, Lorraine E., and Ashby, William J. eds. Preferred argument structure: Grammar as architecture for function. Language 82: 908–912.
Haspelmath, Martin.to appear. Frequency vs. iconicity in explaining grammatical asymmetries. Cognitive Linguistics19.
Hawkins, John A. 1990. A parsing theory of word order universals. Linguistic Inquiry 21: 223–261.
Hawkins, John A. 1994. A performance theory of order and constituency (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 73). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hawkins, John A. 2003. Efficiency and complexity in grammars: Three general principles. In Moore, John and Polinsky, Maria, eds., The nature of explanation in linguistic theory. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 121–152.
Hawkins, John A. 2004. Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heim, Irene. 1983a. File change semantics and the familiarity theory of definiteness. In Rainer, Bäuerle, Christoph, Schwarze, and Stechow, Arnim, eds., Meaning, use and interpretation of language. Berlin: de Gruyter, 164–189.
Heim, Irene. 1983b. On the projection problem for presuppositions. In Barlow, Michael, Flickinger, Daniel P., and Wescoat, Michael T., eds., Proceedings of the 2nd Annual West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 114–125.
Heine, Bernd. 1993. Auxiliaries: Cognitive forces and grammaticalization. New York: Oxford University Press.
Heine, Bernd. 1994a. Principles of grammaticalization. MS, University of Cologne.
Heine, Bernd. 1994b. Grammaticalization as an explanatory parameter. In Pagliuca, William, ed., Perspectives on grammaticalization (Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science IV: Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 109). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 255–287.
Heine, Bernd. 1997. Cognitive foundations of grammar. New York: Oxford University Press.
Heine, Bernd. 2003. Grammaticalization. In Joseph, Brian D. and Janda, Richard D., eds., The handbook of historical linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 575–601.
Heine, Bernd. 2005. On reflexive forms in creoles. Lingua 115: 201–257.
Heine, Bernd and Kuteva, Tania. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heine, Bernd and Reh, Mechthild. 1984. Grammaticalization and reanalysis in African languages. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.
Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike, and Hünnemeyer, Friederike. 1991a. From cognition to grammar: Evidence from African languages. In Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Heine, Bernd, eds., Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. 1: Focus on theoretical and methodological issues (Typological Studies in Language 19:1). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 149–187.
Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike and Hünnemeyer, Friederike.1991b. Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2004. Lexicalization and grammaticalization: opposite or orthogonal? In Bisang, Walter, Himmelmann, Nikolaus P., and Wiemer, Björn, eds., What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 158). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 21–44.
Hirschberg, Julia Bell. 1991. A theory of scalar implicature. New York: Garland.
Hooper, Joan B. 1976. Word frequency in lexical diffusion and the source of morphophonological change. In Christie, W., ed., Current progress in historical linguistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 96–105.
Hopper, Paul J. 1987. Emergent grammar. In Berkeley Linguistics Society 13. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, 139–157.
Hopper, Paul J. 1991. On some principles of grammaticization. In Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Heine, Bernd, eds., Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. 1: Focus on theoretical and methodological issues (Typological Studies in Language 19:1). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 17–35.
Hopper, Paul J. and Thompson, Sandra A.. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56: 251–299.
Hopper, Paul J. and Thompson, Sandra A..1984. The discourse basis for lexical categories in universal grammar. Language 60: 703–752.
Hopper, Paul J. and Thompson, Sandra A..1993. Language universals, discourse pragmatics, and semantics. Language Sciences 15: 357–376.
Hopper, Paul J. and Thompson, Sandra A..2001. Grammatical fragments and social action in conversation. Paper delivered at the 7th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference. UC Santa Barbara, July 22–27, 2001.
Hopper, Paul J. and Closs Traugott, Elizabeth. 1993/2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Horn, Laurence R. 1972. On the semantic properties of the logical operators in English. Mimeo, Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Horn, Laurence R. 1984. A new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicatures. In Schiffrin, Deborah, ed., Meaning, form, and use in context: Linguistic applications (Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 11–42.
Horn, Laurence R. 1985. Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity. Language 61: 121–174.
Horn, Laurence R. 1989. A natural history of negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Horn, Laurence R. 1992. The said and the unsaid. In Barker, Chris and Dowty, David, eds., Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT II). Columbus: Ohio State University Linguistics Department, 163–192.
Horn, Laurence R. 1996. Presupposition and implicature. In Lappin, Shalom, ed., The handbook of contemporary semantic theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 299–319.
Horn, Laurence R. 2004. Implicature. In Horn, Laurence R. and Ward, Gregory, eds., Handbook of pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell, 3–28.
Horn, Laurence R. 2006. The Border Wars: a neo-Gricean perspective. In Turner, Ken and Heusinger, Klaus, eds., Where semantics meets pragmatics. London: Elsevier, 21–48.
Horn, Laurence R. 2007. Toward a Fregean pragmatics: Voraussetzung, Nebengedanke, Andeutung. In Kecskes, Istvan and Horn, Laurence R., eds., Explorations in pragmatics: Linguistic, cognitive, and intercultural aspects: Mouton, 39–69.
Howes, Davis H. and Solomon, Richard L.. 1951. Visual duration threshold as a function of word-probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology 41: 401–410.
Huang, Yan. 2000. Anaphora: A cross-linguistic study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Huddleston, Rodney. 1988. English grammar: An outline. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huddleston, Rodney.2002. The clause: complements. In Huddleston, Rodney and Pullum, Geoffrey K., eds., The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 213–321.
Huddleston, Rodney and Pullum, Geoffrey K., eds. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huddleston, Rodney, Payne, John, and Peterson, Peter. 2002. Coordination and supplementation. In Huddleston, Rodney and Pullum, Geoffrey K., eds., The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1273–1362.
Hundt, Marianne. 2001. What corpora tell us about the grammaticalisation of voice in get-constructions. Studies in Language 25: 49–87.
Hyman, Larry M. 1983. Form and substance in language universals. Linguistics 21: 67–85.
Itkonen, Esa. 2002. Grammaticalization as an analogue of hypothetico-deductive thinking. In Wischer, Ilse and Diewald, Gabriele, eds., New reflections on grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 413–422.
Izre'el, Shlomo. 2002. A corpus of Spoken Israeli Hebrew (CoSIH): Text examples. Leshonenu 64:289–314 (in Hebrew).
Jakobson, Roman. 1971. Quest for the essence of language. In Jakobson, Roman, ed., Roman Jakobson selected writings, vol. 2. The Hague: Mouton, 345–359.
Johnson, Keith. 1997. Speech perception without speaker normalization. In Johnson, Keith and Mullennix, John W., eds., Talker variability in speech processing. San Diego: Academic Press, 145–165.
Johnson, Marcia K., Bransford, John D., and Solomon, Susan K.. 1973. Memory for tacit implications of sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology 98: 203–205.
Joseph, Brian D. 1992. Diachronic explanation: Putting speakers back into the picture. In Davis, Garry W. and Iverson, Gregory K., eds., Explanations in historical linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 123–144.
Joseph, Brian D. and Janda, Richard D., eds. 2003. The handbook of historical linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Jung-Beeman, Mark. 2006. Bilateral brain processes involved in understanding natural language. Paper presented at “Brain and language: Theoretical and clinical perspectives,” Bar-Ilan University.
Jurafsky, Daniel. 1996. Universal tendencies in the semantics of the diminutive. Language 72: 533–578.
Jurafsky, Daniel, Bell, Alan, and Girand, Cynthia. 2002. The role of the lemma in form variation. In Gussenhoven, Carlos and Warner, Natasha, eds., Laboratory Phonology VII. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 3–34.
Jurafsky, Daniel, Bell, Alan, Gregory, Michelle, and Raymond, William D.. 2001. Probabilistic relations between words: Evidence from reduction in lexicon production. In Bybee, Joan L. and Hopper, Paul J., eds., Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (Typological Studies in Language 45). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 229–254.
Kadmon, Nirit. 2001. Formal pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Kamp, Hans. 1995. Discourse representation theory. In Verschueren, Jef, Östman, Jan-Ola, Blommaert, Jan and Bulcaen, Chris, eds., Handbook of pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 253–257.
Kärkkäinen, Elise. 2003. Epistemic stance in English conversation: A description of its interactional functions, with a focus on I think (Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 115). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Karttunen, Lauri. 1973. Presuppositions of compound sentences. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 169–193.
Karttunen, Lauri.1974. Presuppositions and linguistic context. Theoretical Linguistics 1: 3–44.
Karttunen, Lauri and Peters, Stanley. 1979. Conventional implicature. In Oh, Choon-Kyu and Dinneen, David A., eds., Syntax and semantics, vol. 11: Presupposition. New York: Academic Press, 1–56.
Kasher, Asa. 1976. Conversational maxims and rationality. In Kasher, Asa, ed., Language in focus: Foundations, methods and systems. Dordrecht: Reidel, 197–216.
Kasher, Asa.1982. Gricean inference revisited. Philosophica 29: 25–44.
Kasher, Asa.ed. 1998. Pragmatics: Critical concepts. 6 vols. London: Routledge.
Katz, Jerrold J. 1972. Semantic theory. New York: Harper and Row.
Kautzsch, E. 1898. Gesenius' Hebrew grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Keenan, Edward L. 1971. Two kinds of presupposition in natural language. In Fillmore, Charles J. and Langendoen, D. Terence, eds., Studies in linguistic semantics. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 45–52.
Keenan, Edward L. 1996. Creating anaphors: An historical study of the English reflexive pronouns. Unpublished MS, UCLA.
Keenan, Edward L. 2002. Explaining the creation of reflexive pronouns in English. In Minkova, Donka and Stockwell, Robert, eds., Studies in the history of English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 325–355.
Keenan, Edward L. 2003. An historical explanation of some binding theoretic facts in English. In Moore, John and Polinsky, Maria, eds., The nature of explanation in linguistic theory. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 212–256.
Keenan, Edward L. and Comrie, Bernard. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 63–99.
Keenan (Ochs), Elinor. 1977. Why look at planned and unplanned discourse? In Keenan (Ochs), Elinor and Bennett, T., eds., Discourse across time and space (Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics 5). Los Angeles: University of Southern California, 1–42.
Keller, Rudi. 1994. On language change. London: Routledge.
Kemmer, Suzanne. 1993. The middle voice (Typological Studies in Language 23). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kemmer, Suzanne.1995. Emphatic and reflexive -self: Expectations, viewpoint, and subjectivity. In Stein, Dieter and Wright, Susan, eds., Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 55–82.
Kemmer, Suzanne and Barlow, Michael. 1996. Emphatic -self in discourse. In Goldberg, Adele E., ed., Conceptual structure, discourse, and language. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 231–248.
Kemmer, Suzanne and Barlow, Michael.2000. Introduction: A usage-based conception of language. In Barlow, Michael and Kemmer, Suzanne, eds., Usage-based models of language. Stanford: CSLI Publications, vii–xviii.
Kemmer, Suzanne and Verhagen, Arie. 1994. The grammar of causatives and the conceptual structure of events. Cognitive Linguistics 5: 115–156.
Kempson, Ruth M. 1975. Presupposition and the delimitation of semantics (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kempson, Ruth M. 1984. Weak crossover, logical form and pragmatics. Paper presented at GLOW, April 1984.
Kempson, Ruth M., Cann, Ronnie, and Purver, Matthew. To appear. Talking and listening: Dialogue and the grammar-pragmatics interface. In Hackl, Martin and Thornton, Robert, eds., Asserting, meaning and implying. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kiparsky, Paul. 1990. Strong reflexives in Germanic. Paper presented at Diachronic syntax, York.
Koenig, Jean-Pierre. 1991. Scalar predicates and negation: Punctual semantics and interval interpretations. In Chicago Linguistic Society 27. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 140–155.
König, Ekkehard and Siemund, Peter. 2000. Intensifiers and reflexives: A typological perspective. In Frajzyngier, Zygmunt and Curl, Traci S., eds., Reflexives: Forms and functions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 41–74.
König, Ekkehard and Siemund, Peter (with Töpper, Stephan). 2005. Intensifiers and reflexive pronouns. In Haspelmath, Martin, Dryer, Matthew, Gil, David, and Comrie, Bernard, eds., The world atlas of language structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 194–197.
Kövecses, Zoltán. 1995. Anger: Its language, conceptualization, and physiology in the light of cross-cultural evidence. In Maclaury, Robert E. and Taylor, John R., eds., Language and the cognitive construal of the world. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 181–196.
Krug, Manfred. 2000. Emerging English modals: A corpus-based study of grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Krug, Manfred.2001. Frequency, iconicity, categorization: Evidence from emerging modals. In Bybee, Joan L. and Hopper, Paul J., eds., Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (Typological Studies in Language 45). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 309–335.
Krug, Manfred.2003. Frequency as a determinant in grammatical variation and change. In Rohdenburg, Günter and Mondorf, Britta, eds., Determinants of grammatical variation in English (Topics in English Linguistics 43). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 7–67.
Labov, William. 1973. The boundaries of words and their meanings. In Bailey, Charles-James N. and Shuy, Roger W., eds., New ways of analyzing variation in English. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 340–373.
Labov, William.1980. The social origins of sound change. In Labov, William, ed., Locating language in time and space (Quantitative Analyses of Linguistic Structure 1). New York: Academic Press, 251–265.
Labov, William.1990. On the adequacy of natural languages, I: The development of tense. In Singler, John Victor, ed., Pidgin and creole tense-mood-aspect systems (Creole Language Library 6). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1–58.
Labov, William.1994. Principles of linguistic change, vol. 1: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
Labov, William.2001. Principles of linguistic change, vol. 2: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
Ladd, D. Robert. 1990. Intonation: Emotion vs. grammar. Language 66: 806–816.
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lambrecht, Knud. 1984. A pragmatic constraint on lexical subjects in spoken French. In Chicago Linguistic Society 20. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 239–256.
Lambrecht, Knud 1994. Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 71). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lancelot, Claude, Arnauld, Antoine, Nugent, Thomas, and Alston, R. C.. 1660. Grammaire générale et raisonnée.
Landman, Fred. 2000. Events and plurality. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1995. Raising and transparency. Language 71: 1–62.
Langacker, Ronald W. 2000. A dynamic usage-based model. In Barlow, Michael and Kemmer, Suzanne, eds., Usage-based models of language. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 1–63.
Lass, Roger. 1997. Historical linguistics and language change (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levelt, Willem J. M. 1993. Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Levelt, Willem J. M. and Kelter, Stephanie. 1982. Surface form and memory in question answering. Cognitive Psychology 14: 78–106.
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, Stephen C. 1987. Minimization and conversational inference. In Jef, Verschueren and Marcella, Bertuccelli-Papi, eds., The pragmatic perspective (Pragmatics and Beyond Companion Series 5). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 61–129.
Levinson, Stephen C. 1991. Pragmatic reduction of the binding conditions revisited. Journal of Linguistics 27: 107–161.
Levinson, Stephen C. 1995. Three levels of meaning. In Palmer, F. R., ed., Grammar and meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 90–115.
Levinson, Stephen C. 2000a. Maxim. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 9: 144–147.
Levinson, Stephen C. 2000b. Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lewis, David, K. 1968. Convention: A philosophical study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lewis, David, K. 1979. Scorekeeping in a language game. In Rainer, Bäuerle, Urs, Egli, and Arnim, Stechow, eds., Semantics from different points of view (Springer Series in Language and Communication 6). New York: Springer-Verlag, 172–187.
Li, Charles, N. 1975. Synchrony vs. diachrony in language structure. Language 51: 873–886.
Li, Charles N. and Thompson, Sandra A.. 1974. An explanation of word order change SVO → SOV. Foundations of Language 12: 201–214.
Li, Charles N. and Thompson, Sandra A..1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Liberman, Mark. 1973. Alternatives. In Chicago Linguistic Society 9. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 346–355.
Lichtenberk, Frantisek. 1991. Semantic change and heterosemy in grammaticalization. Language 67: 475–509.
Lord, Carol. 1976. Evidence for syntactic reanalysis: From verb to complementizer in Kwa. In Steever, Sanford B., Walker, Carol A., Mufwene, Salikoko S., and Ebert, Robert Peter, eds., Chicago Linguistic Society 12: Papers from the parasession on diachronic syntax. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 179–191.
Lord, Carol and Dahlgren, Kathleen. 1997. Participant and event anaphora in newspaper articles. In Joan, Bybee, John, Haiman, and Thompson, Sandra A., eds., Essays on language function and language type dedicated to T. Givón. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 323–356.
Lordrup, Helge. 1999. Inalienables in Norwegian and binding theory. Linguistics 37: 365–388.
Lyons, Christopher. 1999. Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lyutikova, Ekaterina A. 2000. Reflexives and emphasis in Tsaxur (Nakh-Dagestanian). In Frajzyngier, Zygmunt and Curl, Traci S., eds., Reflexives: Forms and functions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 227–255.
MacDonald, Maryellen C. 1993. The interaction of lexical and syntactic ambiguity. Journal of Memory and Language 32: 692–715.
MacDonald, Maryellen C. 1999. Distributional information in language comprehension, production and acquisition: Three puzzles and a moral. In Brian, MacWhinney, ed., The emergence of language. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 177–196.
Macmillan, . 2002. Macmillan English dictionary for advanced learners. Oxford: Macmillan.
MacWhinney, Brian. 2000. Connectionism and language learning. In Barlow, Michael and Suzanne, Kemmer, eds., Usage-based models of language. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 121–149.
MacWhinney, Brian. 2001. Emergentist approaches to language. In Bybee, Joan L. and Hopper, Paul J., eds., Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (Typological Studies in Language 45). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 449–470.
MacWhinney, Brian and Bates, Elizabeth. 1989. The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Magliano, Joseph P., Baggett, W. B., Johnson, B. K., and Graesser, C. Arthur. 1993. The time course of generating causal antecedent and causal consequence inferences. Discourse Processes 16: 35–53.
Maling, Joan. 1984. Non-clause bounded reflexives in Icelandic. Linguistics and Philosophy 7: 211–241.
Mandelkern, Solomon. 1937. Veteris Testamenti concordantiae (A concordance of the Old Testament). Jerusalem: Shocken.
Mann, William C. and Sandra, A. Thompson. 1986. Relational propositions in discourse. Discourse Processes 9: 57–90.
Manning, Christopher D. 2003. Probabilistic syntax. In Rens, Bod, Jennifer, Hay, and Stefanie, Jannedy, eds., Probabilistic linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 289–341.
Marantz, Alec P. 1984. On the nature of grammatical relations (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 10). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Matsuki, Keiko. 1995. Metaphors of anger in Japanese. In Maclaury, Robert E. and Taylor, John R., eds., Language and the cognitive construal of the world. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 137–152.
McClelland, James L. and Rumelhart, David E.. 1986. Parallel distributed processing, vols. 1 and 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Meibauer, Jorg. 2005. Lying and falsely implicating. Journal of Pragmatics 37: 1373–1399.
Meltzer, Yoram. 2005. Xavlaz ze lo mila (“A waste of time doesn't capture it”). Haaretz, May 6, 2005 (in Hebrew).
Michod, Richard E. 1999. Darwinian dynamics: Evolutionary transitions in fitness and individuality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Miller, Carolyn R. 1984. Genre as social action. The Quarterly Journal of Speech 70: 151–167.
Milroy, James and Milroy, Lesley. 1985. Linguistic change, social network and speaker innovation. Journal of Linguistics 21: 339–384.
Mithun, Marianne. 1984. The evolution of noun incorporation. Language 60: 847–894.
Mithun, Marianne. 1988. The grammaticization of coordination. In Haiman, John and Thompson, Sandra A., eds., Clause combining in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 331–359.
Mithun, Marianne. 1989. Historical linguistics and linguistic theory: Reducing the arbitrary and constraining explanation. In Berkeley Linguistics Society 15. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, 391–408.
Mithun, Marianne. 1991a. Active/agent case marking and its motivations. Language 67: 510–546.
Mithun, Marianne. 1991b. The role of motivation in the emergence of grammatical categories: The grammaticization of subjects. In Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Heine, Bernd, eds., Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. 2: Focus on types of grammatical markers (Typological Studies in Language 19:2). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 159–184.
Mithun, Marianne. 2003. Functional perspectives on syntactic change. In Joseph, Brian D. and Janda, Richard D., eds., The handbook of historical linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 552–572.
Mithun, Marianne.in press. Borrowed rhetorical constructions as starting points for grammaticalization. In Bergs, Alexander and Diewald, Gabriele, eds., Constructions and language change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Moore, John and Polinsky, Maria. 2003. Explanations in linguistics. In Moore, John and Polinsky, Maria, eds., The nature of explanation in linguistic theory. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 1–30.
Morgan, Jerry L. 1978. Two types of convention in indirect speech acts. In Cole, Peter, ed., Syntax and semantics, vol. 9: Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 261–280.
Moscati, Sabatino, Spitaler, Anton, Ullendorff, Edward, and Soden, Wolfram. 1964. An introduction to the comparative grammar of the Semitic languages. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2001. The ecology of language evolution (Cambridge Approaches to Language Contact). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Myhill, John. 1997. Should and ought: the rise of individually oriented modality in American English. English Language and Linguistics 1: 3–23.
Newman, John and Rice, Sally. 2004. Patterns of usage for English sit, stand, and lie: A cognitively inspired exploration in corpus linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics 15: 351–396.
Newmeyer, Frederick. 1991. Iconicity and generative grammar. Language 68: 756–796.
Nicolle, Steve and Clark, Billy. 1999. Experimental pragmatics and what is said: A response to Gibbs and Moise. Cognition 69: 337–354.
Noordman, Leo G. M. and Vonk, Wietzke. 1998. Memory-based processing in understanding causal information. Discourse Processes 26: 191–212.
Noveck, Ira A. 2001. When children are more logical than adults: Experimental investigations of scalar implicature. Cognition 78: 165–188.
Noveck, Ira A. and Posada, Andres. 2003. Characterizing the time course of an implicature: An evoked potentials study. Brain and Language 85: 203–210.
Noveck, Ira A. and Chevaux, Florelle. 2002. The pragmatic development of and. In Skarabela, Barbora, ed., Proceedings of the 26th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 453–463.
Nuyts, Jan. 1992. Aspects of a cognitive-pragmatic theory of language: On cognition, functionalism, and grammar (Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 20). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ochs, Elinor. 1996. Linguistic resources for socializing humanity. In Gumperz, John J. and Levinson, Stephen C., eds., Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 407–437.
Onifer, William and Swinney, David A.. 1981. Accessing lexical ambiguities during sentence comprehension: Effects of frequency of meaning and contextual bias. Memory and Cognition 9: 225–236.
Papafragou, Anna and Musolino, Julien. 2003. Scalar implicatures: Experiments at the semantics–pragmatics interface. Cognition 86: 253–282.
Papafragou, Anna and Schwarz, Naomi. 2005/6. “Most wanted.” Language Acquisition, special issue: The acquisition of quantification, 13: 207–251.
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1932/1965. The icon, index and symbol. In Hartshorne, Charles and Weiss, Paul, eds., Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. 2. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 156–173.
Perry, John. 1993. The problem of the essential indexical and other essays. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 2001. Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. In Bybee, Joan L. and Hopper, Paul J., eds., Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (Typological Studies in Language 45). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 137–157.
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 2003. Probabilistic phonology: Discrimination and robustness. In Moore, John and Polinsky, Maria, eds., The nature of explanation in linguistic theory. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 177–228.
Posner, Roland. 1980. Semantics and pragmatics of sentence connectives in natural languages. In Searle, John R., Kiefer, Ferenc, and Bierwisch, Manfred, eds., Speech act theory and pragmatics (Synthese Language Library 10). Boston: Reidel, 169–203.
Potts, George R., Keenan, Janice M. and Golding, Jonathan M.. 1988. Assessing the occurrence of elaborative inferences: Lexical decision versus naming. Journal of Memory and Language 27: 399–415.
Prince, Ellen F. 1976. The syntax and semantics of Neg-Raising, with evidence from French. Language 52: 404–426.
Prince, Ellen F. 1978. On the function of existential presupposition in discourse. In Chicago Linguistic Society 14. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 362–376.
Prince, Ellen F. 1981. On the inferencing of indefinite this NPs. In Joshi, Aravind K., Webber, Bonnie L., and Sag, Ivan A., eds., Elements of discourse understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 231–250.
Prince, Ellen F. 1988. Discourse analysis: A part of the study of linguistic competence. In Newmeyer, Frederick J. and Robins, R. H., eds., Linguistics: The Cambridge survey, vol. 2: Linguistic theory: Extensions and implications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 164–182.
Prince, Ellen F. 1998. On the limits of syntax, with reference to left-dislocation and topicalization. In Culicover, Peter W. and McNally, Louise, eds., Syntax and semantics, vol. 29: The limits of syntax. San Diego: Academic Press, 281–302.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey, and Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
Reboul, Anne. 1997. What (if anything) is accessibility? A relevance-oriented criticism of Ariel's accessibility theory of referring expressions. In Connolly, John H., Vismans, Roel M., Butler, Christopher S., and Gatward, Richard A., eds., Discourse and pragmatics in functional grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 91–108.
Recanati, François. 1989. The pragmatics of what is said. Mind and Language 4:295–328. (Reprinted in Steven Davis, ed., 1991. Pragmatics: A reader. New York: Oxford University Press, 97–120.)
Recanati, François.1993. Direct reference. Oxford: Blackwell.
Recanati, François.1995. The alleged priority of literal interpretation. Cognitive Science 19: 207–232.
Recanati, François.2001. “What is said.” Synthese 128: 75–91.
Recanati, François.2002a. Does linguistic communication rest on inference? Mind and Language 17: 105–126.
Recanati, François.2002b. Unarticulated constituents. Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 299–345.
Recanati, François.2004. ‘What is said’ and the semantics/pragmatics distinction. In Bianchi, Claudia and Penco, Carlo, eds., The semantics/pragmatics distinction. Proceedings from WOC 2002. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 45–64.
Recanati, François.2007. Truth conditional pragmatics. In Bouquet, Paolo, Serafini, Luciano, and Thomason, Rich, eds., Perspectives on Contexts. Stanford: CSLI.
Reinhart, Tanya. 1983. Anaphora and semantic interpretation. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Reinhart, Tanya.1991. Elliptic conjunctions: Non-quantificational LF. In Kasher, Asa, ed., The Chomskyan turn. Oxford: Blackwell, 360–384.
Reinhart, Tanya and Reuland, Eric. 1993. Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 657–720.
Reinhart, Tanya and Siloni, Tal. 2005. Thematic arity operations and parametric variation. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 389–436.
Romaine, Suzanne. 1999. The grammaticalization of the proximative in Tok Pisin. Language 75: 322–346.
Rosenbach, Anette. 2005. Animacy versus weight as determinants of grammatical variation in English. Language 81: 613–644.
Rosenbach, Anette and Jäger, Gerhard. 2006. Priming as a driving force in grammaticalization: On the track of unidirectionality. Unpublished MS, Universities of Düsseldorf and Bielefeld.
Russell, Bertrand. 1905. On denoting. Mind 14: 479–493.
Sadock, Jerrold M. 1978. On testing for conversational implicature. In Cole, Peter, ed., Syntax and semantics, vol. 9: Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 281–297. (Reprinted in Kasher, ed. 1998, vol. 4: 315–331.)
Saffran, Jenny R., Aslin, Richard N., and Newport, Elissa L.. 1996. Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science 274: 1926.
Sailer, M. 2002. The German incredulity response construction and the hierarchical organization of constructions. Paper presented at 2nd International Conference on Construction Grammar, Helsinki.
Salmon, Nathan. 1991. The pragmatic fallacy. Philosophical Studies 63: 83–97.
Sanders, Ted J. M. and Noordman, Leo G. M.. 2001. The role of coherence relations and their linguistic markers in text processing. Discourse Processes 29: 37–60.
Saul, Jennifer M. 2002. What is said and psychological reality: Grice's project and relevance theorists' criticism. Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 347–372.
Scheibman, Joanne. 2002. Point of view and grammar: Structural patterns of subjectivity in American English conversation (Studies in Discourse and Grammar 11). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Schiffer, Stephen. 1972. Meaning. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1985. Multiple constraints on discourse options: a quantitative analysis of causal sequences. Discourse Processes 8: 281–301.
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1986. The functions of and in discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 10: 41–66.
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schladt, Mathias. 2000. The typology and grammaticalization of reflexives. In Frajzyngier, Zygmunt and Curl, Traci S., eds., Reflexives: Forms and functions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 103–124.
Searle, John R. 1980. The background of meaning. In Searle, John R., Kiefer, Ferenc, and Bierwisch, Manfred, eds., Speech act theory and pragmatics (Synthese Language Library 10). Boston: Reidel, 221–232.
Searle, John R. 1992. The rediscovery of the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Seidenberg, Mark S., Tanenhaus, Michael K., Leiman, James M., and Bienkowski, Marie. 1982. Automatic access of the meanings of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge-based processing. Cognitive Psychology 14: 489–537.
Shimizu, Makoto and Murata, Masaki. 2004. Transitive verb plus reflexive pronoun/personal pronoun patterns in English and Japanese: Using a Japanese-English parallel corpus. Talk presented at ICAME, Verona, May 2004.
Shlonsky, Ur. 1992. Resumptive pronouns as a last resort. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 443–468.
Siemund, Peter. 2003. Varieties of English from a cross-linguistic perspective: Intensifiers and reflexives. In Rohdenburg, Günter and Mondorf, Britta, eds., Determinants of grammatical variation in English (Topics in English Linguistics 43). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 479–506.
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In Basso, Keith and Selby, Henry A., eds., Meaning in anthropology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 11–55.
Silverstein, Michael. 2001. The limits of awareness. In Duranti, Alessandro, ed., Linguistic anthropology: A reader. Oxford: Blackwell, 382–401.
Sinclair, John M. 1991. Corpus, concordance collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sinclair, John M. 1992. Trust the text. In Davies, Martin and Ravelli, Louise, eds., Advances in systemic linguistics: Recent theory and practice (Open Linguistics Series). London: Pinter, 5–19.
Singer, Murray. 1979. Processes of inference during sentence encoding. Memory and Cognition 7: 192–200.
Singer, Murray. 1980. The role of case-filling inferences in the coherence of brief passages. Discourse Processes 3: 185–200.
Singer, Murray and Ferreira, Fernanda. 1983. Inferring consequences in story comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 22: 437–448.
Smith, Mark. 2004. Light and heavy reflexives. Linguistics 42: 573–615.
Snow, Catherine E. 1999. Social perspectives on the emergence of language. In MacWhinney, Brian, ed., The emergence of language. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 257–276.
Soames, Scott. 1979. A projection problem for speaker presuppositions. Linguistic Inquiry 10: 623–666.
Soames, Scott. 1982. How presuppositions are inherited: A solution to the projection problem. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 483–545.
Soames, Scott. 2002. Beyond rigidity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Solan, Lawrence M. 1983. Pronominal reference: Child language and the theory of grammar (Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics). Dordrecht: Reidel.
Solan, Zach, Horn, David, Ruppin, Eytan, and Edelman, Shimon. 2005. Unsupervised learning of natural languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America 102: 11629–11634.
Sperber, Dan and Wilson, Deirdre. 1986/1995. Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sperber, Dan and Wilson, Deirdre.1987. Précis of Relevance: Communication and cognition. Behavioral & Brain Sciences 10: 697–754.
Stainton, Robert J. 1994. Using non-sentences: An application of Relevance theory. Pragmatics and Cognition 2: 269–284.
Stalnaker, Robert C. 1974. Pragmatic presuppositions. In Munitz, Milton K. and Unger, Peter K., eds., Semantics and Philosophy. New York: New York University Press, 197–214.
Stanley, Jason. 2000. Context and logical form. Linguistics and Philosophy 23: 391–434.
Stefanowitsch, Anatol and Gries, Stefan Th.. 2003. Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8: 209–243.
Stern, Gustav. 1931. Meaning and change of meaning (Indiana University Studies in the History and Theory of Linguistics). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Stirling, Lesley and Huddleston, Rodney. 2002. Deixis and anaphora. In Huddleston, Rodney and Pullum, Geoffrey K., eds., The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1449–1564.
Strawson, Peter F. 1950. On referring. Mind 59: 320–344.
Strawson, Peter F. 1952. Introduction to logical theory. London: Methuen.
Strawson, Peter F. 1964/1974. Identifying reference and truth-values. In Zabeeh, Farhang, Klemke, E. D., and Jacobson, Arthur, eds., Readings in semantics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 194–216.
Swales, John M. 1990. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings (Cambridge Applied Linguistics Series). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sweetser, Eve. 1987. The definition of “lie.” In Holland, Dorothy and Quinn, Naomi, eds., Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–66.
Sweetser, Eve. 1988. Grammaticalization and semantic bleaching. In Berkeley Linguistics Society 14. Berkeley, 389–405.
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 54). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swinney, David A. 1979. Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18: 645–659.
Talmy, Leonard. 1983. How language structures space. In Pick, Herbert L. and Acredolo, Linda P., eds., Spatial orientation: Theory, research, and application. New York: Plenum Press, 225–282.
Talmy, Leonard. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Shopen, Timothy, ed., Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 36–149.
Talmy, Leonard. 1988. The relation of grammar to cognition. In Rudzka-Ostyn, Brygida, ed., Topics in Cognitive Linguistics (Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science IV: Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 50). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 165–205.
Terkel, Studs. 1974. Working. New York: Avon.
Thompson, Sandra A. 1990. Information flow and dative shift in English discourse. In Edmondson, Jerold A., Feagin, Crawford, and Mühlhäusler, Peter, eds., Development and diversity: Language variation across time and space (Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington Publications in Linguistics 93). Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics and University of Texas at Arlington, 239–253.
Thompson, Sandra A. 1991. On addressing functional explanation in linguistics. Language and Communication 11: 93–96.
Thompson, Sandra A. 2002. Constructions and conversation. Unpublished MS, UC Santa Barbara.
Thompson, Sandra A. and Hopper, Paul J.. 2001. Transitivity, clause structure, and argument structure: Evidence from conversation. In Bybee, Joan L. and Hopper, Paul J., eds., Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (Typological Studies in Language 45). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 27–60.
Tomasello, Michael. 1992. First verbs: A case study of early grammatical development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tomasello, Michael. 2000. The item-based nature of children's early syntactic development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4: 156–163.
Tomasello, Michael. 2003a. Constructing a language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tomasello, Michael.ed. 2003b. The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, vol. 2. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Toole, Janine. 1996. The effect of genre on referential choice. In Thorstein, Fretheim and Gundel, Jeanette K., eds., Reference and referent accessibility. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 263–290.
Tottie, Gunnel. 1991. Lexical diffusion in syntactic change: Frequency as a determinant of linguistic conservatism in the development of negation in English. In Kastovsky, Dieter, ed., Historical English syntax (Topics in English Linguistics 2). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 439–467.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1982. From propositional to textual and expressive meanings: Some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In Lehmann, Winfred P. and Malkiel, Yakov, eds., Perspectives on historical linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 245–271.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1988. Pragmatic strengthening and grammaticalization. In Berkeley Linguistics Society 14. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, 406–416.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65: 31–55.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2003. Constructions in grammaticalizations. In Joseph, Brian D. and Janda, Richard D., eds., The handbook of historical linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 624–647.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2004a. Historical pragmatics. In Horn, Laurence R. and Ward, Gregory, eds., Handbook of pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell, 538–561.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2004b. Exaptation and grammaticalization. In Akimoto, Minoji, ed., Linguistic studies based on corpora. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo Publishing Co., 133–156.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Dasher, Richard B.. 2002. Regularity in semantic change (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 97). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Heine, Bernd, eds. 1991. Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. 1: Focus on theoretical and methodological issues; vol. 2: Focus on types of grammatical markers (Typological Studies in Language 19:1, 19:2). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and König, Ekkehard. 1991. The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Heine, Bernd, eds., Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. 1: Focus on theoretical and methodological issues (Typological Studies in Language 19:1). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 189–219.
Travis, Charles. 1991. Annals of analysis: Studies in the way of words, by Grice, H. P.. Mind 100: 237–264.
Trudgill, Peter. 1995. Grammaticalisation and social structure: Non-standard conjunction-formation in east Anglian English. In Palmer, F. R., ed., Grammar and meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 136–145.
Turk, Monica J. 2004. Using and in conversational interaction. Research on language and social interaction 37: 219–250.
Verhagen, Arie. 2000. Interpreting usage: Construing the history of Dutch causal verbs. In Barlow, Michael and Kemmer, Suzanne, eds., Usage-based models of language. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 261–286.
Walker, Ralph C. S. 1975. Conversational implicatures. In Blackburn, Simon, ed., Meaning, reference and necessity: New studies in semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 133–181.
Ward, Gregory L. 1990. The discourse functions of VP preposing. Language 66: 742–763.
Wedel, Andrew Benjamin. 2004. Self-organization and categorical behavior in phonology. In Berkeley Linguistics Society 29. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, 611–622.
Weiner, E. Judith and Labov, William. 1983. Constraints on the agentless passive. Journal of Linguistics 19: 29–58.
Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William, and Herzog, Marvin I.. 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Lehmann, Winfred P. and Malkiel, Yakov, eds., Directions for historical linguistics: A symposium. Austin: University of Texas Press, 98–195.
Werner, Heinz and Kaplan, Bernard. 1963. Symbol formation: An organismic-developmental approach to language and the expression of thought. New York: Wiley and Sons.
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1985. “Oats” and “wheat”: The fallacy of arbitrariness. In Haiman, John, ed., Iconicity in syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 311–342.
Wilson, Deirdre. 1975. Presuppositions and non-truth-conditional semantics. New York: Academic Press.
Wilson, Deirdre. 1992. Reference and Relevance. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 4: 165–191.
Wilson, Deirdre. 1995. Is there a maxim of truthfulness?UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 7: 197–212.
Wilson, Deirdre. 2003. Relevance and lexical pragmatics. Italian Journal of Linguistics/Rivista di Linguistica, special issue: Pragmatics and the lexicon, 15:273–291. (Reprinted in UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 16(2004), 343–360.)
Wilson, Deirdre. 2005. New directions for research on pragmatics and modularity. Lingua 115: 1129–1146.
Wilson, Deirdre and Sperber, Dan. 1979. Ordered entailments: An alternative to presuppositional theories. In Choon-Kyu, Oh and Dinneen, David A., eds., Syntax and semantics, vol. 11: Presupposition. New York: Academic Press, 299–323.
Wilson, Deirdre and Sperber, Dan.1993. Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua 90: 1–25.
Wilson, Deirdre and Sperber, Dan.1998. Pragmatics and time. In Carston, Robyn and Uchida, Seiji, eds., Relevance theory: Applications and implications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1–22.
Wilson, Deirdre and Sperber, Dan.2002. Truthfulness and relevance. Mind 111: 583–632.
Wilson, Deirdre and Sperber, Dan.2004. Relevance theory. In Horn, Laurence R. and Ward, Gregory, ed., Handbook of pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell, 607–632.
Witkowski, Stanley R. and Brown, Cecil H.. 1983. Marking reversals and cultural importance. Language 59: 569–582.
Yus Ramos, Francisco. 1998. The “what-do-you-mean syndrome.” A taxonomy of misunderstandings in Harold Pinter's plays. Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense 6: 81–100.
Zipf, George Kingsley. 1929. Relative frequency as a determinant of phonetic change. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 15: 1–95.
Ziv, Yael. 1994. Left and right dislocations: Discourse functions and anaphora. Journal of Pragmatics 22: 629–645.
Zribi-Hertz, Anne. 1995. Emphatic or reflexive? On the endophoric character of French lui-même and similar complex pronouns. Journal of Linguistics 31: 333–374.
Zribi-Hertz, Anne. 2003. Réflexivité et disjonction référentielle en français et en anglais. In Miller, P. and Zribi-Hertz, Anne, eds., Essais sur la grammaire comparée du français et de l'anglais. Saint Denis: Presses Universitaires Vincennes, 142–169.
Zuraw, Kie. 2003. Probability in language change. In Bod, Rens, Hay, Jennifer, and Jannedy, Stefanie, eds., Probabilistic linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 139–176.
