Metrics
Full text views
Full text views help
Loading metrics...
* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.
Usage data cannot currently be displayed.
Strategic Open Justice examines how fusing two fundamental components of modern democratic societies – strategic communication and open justice – has begun a revolutionary change in the way courts manage their public media and communication practice. It explores historic developments that have led to contemporary media and communication operations in the courts and how these both build and challenge public opinion and community confidence in the administration of justice and the judicial arm of government. The cross-disciplinary approach combines theory and practice from law, media and journalism, strategic communication, and narratology in a single, internationally researched volume. Examining concepts such as publicity, transparency, media platforms, big data, AI, and open justice itself, it presents a thought-provoking analysis of how contemporary open justice developed and changed, the actors involved, how communication and media drive engagement, and the challenges and benefits in modernising court communication practices, cultures, and traditions.
‘Jane Johnston is the world's leading theorist of public and strategic communication by the courts. Strategic Open Justice explains how courts can move purposefully in the modern mediatised and networked world in order to advance open justice. The book makes a unique contribution to a blend of fields: communications theory, the courts, the law and the media. The book will be enormously useful to courts, their leaders and public information officers, journalists, strategic communicators, lawyers, scholars and students.’
Patrick Keyzer - Professor of Constitutional Law and Human Rights, Australian Catholic University
‘Strategic Open Justice compellingly reframes open justice for a transformed media age. Bringing law into dialogue with communication theory and international practice, Jane Johnston shows why contemporary courts cannot rely on passive transparency alone, but must communicate purposefully, ethically and intelligently. Insightful, wide-ranging and timely, this is an important contribution.’
Angioletta Sperti - author of Constitutional Courts, Media and Public Opinion (2023); Professor of Comparative Constitutional Law, University of Pisa
Loading metrics...
* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.
Usage data cannot currently be displayed.
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.
The PDF of this book complies with version 2.2 of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), offering more comprehensive accessibility measures for a broad range of users and attains the highest (AAA) level of WCAG compliance, optimising the user experience by meeting the most extensive accessibility guidelines.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You can access graphs or charts in a text or tabular format, so you are not excluded if you cannot process visual displays.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.