In the increasingly knowledge- and innovation-based economy in which the mobility of the workforce is vital, employees and ex-employees are considered to be one of the biggest threats to the existence of trade secrets. The interests of the former parties to the employment relationship are contradictory: employers want to safeguard their competitive position by limiting use of information, and employees want to use that information to pursue their professional career. Magdalena Kolasa analyses existing guidelines that determine the extent to which former employees may use information learned during service. She proposes criteria for a balanced enforcement of trade secrets, discussing the statutory and implicit confidentiality duties, contractual protection, and remedies. Drawing from the laws of Germany, UK, and USA, and considering the EU Trade Secrets Directive, this book advocates an approach which recognises the value and functions of trade secrecy both within companies and in the context of public policy.
'The book fulfils the author’s stated aim and does, albeit within the limitations of a comparative approach, offer a nuanced and balanced view of a complex field of law.'
John Hull Source: International Company and Commercial Law Review
Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA)
Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (CDPA)
Patents Act 1977
Competition Act 1998
US Patent Act, US Code Title 35 (US Patent Act)
US Copyright Act, US Code Title 17 (USCA)
Sherman Act, US Code Title 15 (Sherman Act)
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
California Business and Professions Code
California Labor Code
Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA)
Defend Trade Secters Act (DTSA)
Restatement (First) of Torts
Restatement (Third) of Unfair Competition
Restatement (Third) of Agency
Antitrust Guidelines for the Licensing of Intellectual Property, US Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, 6 April 1995 www.justice.gov/atr/public/guidelines/0558.htm#t22 accessed 1 June 2017
BGH GRUR 2006, 1044 Kundendatenprogramm
BGH GRUR 2003, 356, Präzisionsmessgeräte
BGH GRUR 1995, 349 Objektive Schadensberechnung
BGH WRP 2002, 214 Spiegel-CD-Rom
BGH GRUR 1991, 914 Kastanienmuster
BGH GRUR 1993, 55 Tchibo/Rolex II
BGH GRUR 1962, 509 Dia-Rämchen II
BGH GRUR 2001, 329 Berechnung des Verletzergewinns nach Schutzrechtsverstoβ
BGH GRUR 1977, 539 Prozessrechner
BGH GRUR 1999, 934 Weinberater
BGH GRUR 1963, 367 Industrieböden
BGH GRUR 1964, 215 Milchfahrer
BGH NJW 2009, 1420 Versicherungsvertreter
BGH GRUR 1955, 424 Möbelpaste with reference to RGZ 149, 334 = GRUR 1936, 255, Kaffee-Kanne,
BGH GRUR 1961, 40 Wurftaubenpresse
MMR 2001, 310 (BGH) Wetterführungspläne I
MMR 2002, 99 (BGH) Wetterführungspläne II
BGH GRUR 2012, 1048 MOVICOL-Zulassungsantrag
OLG Köln GRUR-RR 2010, 480 Werbeadressen als Geschäftsgeheimnis
NJW 1967, 125 (BAG)
BGH GRUR 2009, 694 Orange Book Standard
RGZ 149, 329 Stiefeleisenpresse
BGH GRUR 2008, 727 Schweiβmodulgenerator
BGH GRUR 1985, 294 Füllanlage
BGH GRUR 1983, 179 Stapel-Automat
BGH GRUR 2002, 91 Spritzgießwerkzeuge
BGH GRUR 1998, 489 Unbestimmter Unterlassungsantrag III
BGH GRUR 1955, 388 Dücko
BGH GRUR 1955, 468 Schwermetall-Kokillenguß
BGH GRUR 1960, 554 Handstrickverfahren
BGH GRUR 1955, 402 Anreißgerät
BGH NJW 2000, 2584 Mandantenschutzklausel
NJW 1983, 134 (BAG) Thrombosol
NJW 1988, 1686 (BAG) Kundenlisten = NZA 1988, 502 (BAG) Kundenschutzabrede
NJW 2006, 3803 (BAG) Herausgabeanspruch
NZA 1999, 200 (BAG) Kantenbänder
NZA 1994, 502 (BAG) Titanoxid
NZA 2011, 413 (BAG) Vorvertrag bei Wettbewerbsverbot
NZA 2010, 1175 (BAG) Anspruch auf Karenzentschädigung
NZA 2008, 170 (BAG) Wirksamkeit einer Vertragsstrafenabrede
OLG München judgment of 28.06.2012, 6U 1560/12
WRP 1995, 114 (OLG Celle) judgment of 26.05.1994, 13U 29/94
WRP 2008, 938 (BGH) Entwendete Datensätze mit Konstruktionszeichnungen
WRP 1993, 36 (OLG Hamm) Tierohrmarken
LAG Hamm judgment of 05.10.1988, 15 Sa 1403/88, BeckRS 1988, 06934
LAG Thüringen decision of 11.06.2001, 8 Sa 418/00, ZIP 2002, 587
LAG Baden-Württemberg judgment of 30.01.2008, 10 Sa 60/07, NZA-RR 2008, 508
OLG Düsseldorf judgment of 24.05.2005, I-20 U 25/05 MMR 2005, 776
LAG Niedersachsen judgment of 08.12.2005, 7 Sa 1871/05
LAG Hamm judgment of 12.09.2006, 7 Sa 1356/06
BAG judgment of 16.12.1968, 3 AZR 434/67, AP GewO §133 Nr 21
BAG judgment of 30.01.1970, 3 AZR 348/69, AP GewO §133 Nr 24
BAG judgment of 24.06.1986, 3 AZR 486/84, AP BGB § 611 Betriebsgeheimnis Nr.4
BVerfG NVwZ 2006, 1041.
AB and CD [2014] EWHC 1 (QB)
Allfiled UK Ltd v Eltis & 16 Others [2015] EWHC 1300 (Ch)
American Cyanamid Co v Ethicon Ltd [1975] AC 396 (HL)
Arbuthnot Funds Managers v Rawlings [2003] EWCA Civ 518 (EWCA)
Associated Foreign Exchange Ltd v International Foreign Exchange (UK) Ltd [2010] EWHC 1178 (Ch)
AT Poeton (Gloucester Plating) Ltd and Another v Horton and Another [2000] ICR 1208 (CA)
Attorney General v Newspaper Publishing Plc [1989] 2 FSR 27 (Ch)
Balston Ltd v Headline Filters Ltd [1987] FSR 330 (Ch)
Basic Solutions Ltd v Robert Sands [2008] EWHC 1388 (QB)
BBC v Collins [2010] EWHC 2424 (Ch)
Beckett Investment Management Group Ltd v Hall [2007] EWCA Civ 613 (CA)
Boardman v Phipps [1967] 2 AC 46 (HL)
Brake Brothers Ltd v Ungless [2004] EWHC 2799 (QB)
Caterpillar Logistics Services v Huesca de Crean [2012] EWCA Civ 156 (CA)
Coco v Clark Ltd [1968] FSR 415 (Ch)
Coogan and Phillips v News Group Newspapers Ltd and Mulcaire [2012] EWCA Civ 48 (EWCA).
Corporate Express Ltd v Day [2004] EWHC 2943 (QB)
Coventry v Lawrence [2014] UKSC 13 (UKSC)
Cranleigh Precision Engineering Ltd v Bryant and Another [1965] 1 WLR 1293 (QB)
Crowson Fabrics Ltd v Rider [2008] FSR 17 (Ch)
Cyrus Energy Ltd v Stewart [2009] CSOH 53 (CSOH)
Dawnay Day & Co Ltd v D’Alphen [1998] ICR 1068 (CA)
Donoghue v Allied Newspapers Ltd [1938] Ch 106 (Ch)
Douglas v Hello! Ltd (No3) [2006] 1 QB 125 (CA)
Dyson Technology Ltd v Strutt [2005] EWHC 2814 (Ch)
Faccenda Chicken v Fowler [1984] ICR 589 (Ch)
Faccenda Chicken v Fowler [1987] 1 Ch 117 (CA)
Fairstar v Adkins [2012] EWHC 2952 (TCC)
Fairstar v Adkins [2013] EWCA Civ 886 (CA)
Force India Formula One Team Ltd v Aerolab Srl & Another [2013] EWCA Civ 780 (EWCA)
GD Searle & Co Ltd v Celltech Ltd and Others [1982] FSR 92 (CA)
General Billposting Co Ltd v Atkinson [1909] AC 118 (HL)
Generics (UK) Ltd v Yeda Research and Development Co Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 726 (EWCA)
Gilford Motor Company Ltd v Horne [1933] Ch 935 (CA)
Helmet Integrated Systems Ltd v Tunnard [2007] FSR (16) 437 (CA)
Herbert Morris Ltd v Saxelby [1916] 1 AC 688 (HL)
International Consulting Services (UK) Ltd v Hart [2000] IRLR 227 (QB)
Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd v West Bromwich Building Society [1998] 1 WLR 896 (HL)
Lancashire Fires Ltd v SA Lyons & Comp Ltd and Others [1996] FSR 629 (CA)
Lansing Linde v Kerr [1991] 1 WLR 251 (CA)
Lawrence David Ltd v Ashton [1989] ICR 123 (CA)
M&S Drapers (A Firm) v Reynolds [1957] 1 WLR 9 (CA)
Mars v Teknowledge [1999] EWHC 226 (Pat)
Mason v Provident [1913] AC 724 (HL)
Mustad v Allock and Dosen (1928) [1964] 1 WLR 109 (HL)
Ocular Sciences Ltd v Aspect Vision Care Ltd [1997] RPC 289 (Pat).
Phillips v Mulcaire [2012] UKSC 28 (UKSC)
Potters-Ballotini v Weston Baker [1977] RPC 202 (CA)
Pride of Derby v British Celanese [1953] Ch 149 (CA)
Prince Albert v Strange [1849] EWHC Ch J20 (EWHC)
Prince Jefri Bolkiah v KPMG [1999] 2 AC 222 (HL)
Printers & Finishers v Holloway [1965] 1 WLR 1 (CA)
Prophet Plc v Christopher Huggett [2014] EWCA Civ 1013 (EWCA)
Re-Use Collections Ltd v Sendall [2014] EWHC 3852 (QB)
Rex Stewart Jeffries Parker Ginsberg Ltd v Parker [1988] IRLR 483 (CA)
Rock Refrigeration Ltd v Jones [1997] ICR 938 (CA)
Roger Bullivant Ltd v Ellis [1987] ICR 464 (CA)
Schering Chemicals Ltd v Falkman Ltd and Others [1982] QB 1 (CA)
Scully UK Ltd v Lee [1998] IRLR 259 (CA)
Seager v Copydex (No 2) [1969] 1 WLR 809 (CA)
Seager v Copydex [1967] 1 WLR 923 (CA)
Secktrack NV v Satamatics Ltd [2007] EWHC3003 (Comm)
Series 5 Software Ltd v Clarke [1996] FSR 273 (Ch)
Sun Valley Foods v Vincent [2000] FSR 825 (Ch)
Sunrise Brokers LLP and Michael William Rodgers [2014] EWHC 2633 (QB)
Thermascan Ltd v Norman [2009] EWHC 3694 (QB)
Thomas Marshall v Guinle [1979] 1 Ch 227 (Ch)
Threeway Pressings Ltd [2012] BL O/124/12 (UKIPO)
Triplex Safety Glass Co v Scorah [1938] Ch 211 (Ch)
Universal Thermosensors v Hibben [1992] 1 WLR 840 (Ch)
Vercoe v Rutland Fund [2010] EWHC 424 (Ch)
Vestergaard Frandsen A/S & Ors v Bestnet Europe Ltd & Ors [2009] EWHC 1456 (Ch)
Vestergaard Frandsen A/S & Ors v Bestnet Europe Ltd & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 424 (CA)
Vestergaard Frandsen A/S & Ors v Bestnet Europe Ltd & Ors [2013] UKSC 31 (UKSC)
Volkswagen AG v Garcia and others [2013] EWHC 1832 (Ch)
Wallace Bogan & Co v Cove [1997] IRLR 453 (CA)
Western Excavating (ECC) Ltd v Sharp [1978] 1 QB 761 (CA)
WWF World Wide Fund for Nature v World Wrestling Federation Entertainment Inc [2006] EWHC 184 (Ch)
Loading metrics...
* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.
Usage data cannot currently be displayed.
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.