Aarts, Bas, Joanne Close and Sean A. Wallis 2010. Recent changes in the use of the progressive construction in English. In Bert Cappelle and Naoki Wada (eds.), Distinctions in English grammar, offered to Renaat Declerck. Tokyo: Kaitakusha, 148–67.
Aarts, Bas, Maria José López-Couso and Belén Méndez-Naya 2012. Late modern English syntax. In Alexander Bergs and Laurel Brinton (eds.), English Historical linguistics: an international handbook, vol. 2. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 869–87.
Aarts, Bas, Gerald Nelson and Sean A. Wallis 1998. Using Fuzzy Tree Fragments to explore English grammar. English Today 14:3, 52–56.
Aarts, Bas, Sean A. Wallis and Jill Bowie forthcoming. Profiling the English verb phrase over time: modal patterns. In Irma Taavitsainen, Merja Kytö, Claudia Claridge and Jeremy Smith (eds.) Developments in English: expanding electronic evidence. Cambridge University Press.
Aarts, Jan and Flor Aarts 1995. Find and want: a corpus-based study in verb complementation. In Bas Aarts and Charles F. Meyer (eds.), The verb in contemporary English. Cambridge University Press, 159–82.
Abraham, Werner and Elisabeth Leiss (eds.) 2008. Modality–aspect interfaces. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Adams, Kenneth A. 2008. A manual of style for contract drafting. Chicago: American Bar Association.
Aijmer, Karin 1997. I think – an English modal particle. In Toril Swan and Olaf Jansen Westwik (eds.), Modality in Germanic languages: historical and comparative perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1–47.
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford University Press.
Aitchison, Jean 1991. Language change: progress or decay?Cambridge University Press.
Algeo, John 1988. British and American grammatical differences. International Journal of Lexicography 1:1, 1–31.
Algeo, John 2006. British or American English? A handbook of word and grammar patterns. Cambridge University Press.
Allerton, David J. 2000. Articulatory inertia vs. ‘Systemzwang’: changes in liaison phenomena in recent British English. English Studies 6, 574–81.
Anderson, John (ed.) 1982. Language form and linguistic variation: papers dedicated to Angus McIntosh (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 15). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Anderwald, Lieselotte 2002. Negation in non-standard British English: gaps, regularizations and asymmetries. London and New York: Routledge.
Anderwald, Lieselotte 2004. Local markedness as a heuristic tool in dialectology: the case of amn't. In Bernd Kortman (ed.), Dialectology meets typology: dialect grammar from a cross-linguistic perspective. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 47–67.
Arnaud, René 1998. The development of the progressive in 19th century English: a quantitative survey. Language Variation and Change 10, 123–52.
Asprey, Michèle 1992. Shall must go. Scribes Journal of Legal Writing 3, 79–83.
Australian Government Office of Parliamentary Counsel 2009.
Plain Language. At
www.opc.gov.au/plain (last accessed 25 November 2009).
Bailey, Guy, Natalie Maynor and Patricia Cuckor-Avila 1989. Variation in subject–verb concord in Early Modern English. Language Variation and Change 1, 285–300.
Bailey, Guy, Tom Wikle, Jan Tillery and Lori Sand 1991. The apparent time construct. Language Variation and Change 3:3, 241–64.
Baker, Paul 2009. The BE06 Corpus of British English and recent language change. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14:3, 312–37.
Ball, Catherine 1994. Automated text analysis: cautionary tales. Literary and Linguistic Computing 9, 295–302.
Banks, David 2008. The development of scientific writing: linguistic features and historical context. London: Equinox.
Barber, Charles 1964. Linguistic change in Present-Day English. Edinburgh and London: Oliver and Boyd.
Baron, Naomi S. 2003. Language of the internet. In Ali Farghali (ed.), The Stanford handbook for language engineers. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 1–63.
Baron, Naomi S. 2004. See you online: gender issues in college student use of instant messaging. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 23:4, 397–423.
Bauer, Laurie 1994. Watching English change: an introduction to the study of linguistic change in Standard Englishes in the twentieth century. London: Longman.
Bergs, Alexander 2010. Expressions of futurity in contemporary English: a construction grammar perspective. English Language and Linguistics 14: 2 special Issue, 217–38.
Bergs, Alexander and Gabriele Diewald 2008. Introduction: constructions and language change. In Alexander Bergs and Gabriele Diewald (eds.), Constructions and language change. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1–21.
Berlage, Eva 2007. Processing complexity and grammatical variation in British and American English. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Paderborn.
Bhatia, Vijay K. 1993. Analyzing genre: language use in professional settings. London: Longman.
Bhatia, Vijay K. 1994. Cognitive structuring in legislative provisions. In John Gibbons (ed.), Language and the law. London: Longman, 136–55.
Bhatia, Vijay K., Nicola Langton and Jane Lung 2004. Legal discourse: opportunities and threats for corpus linguistics. In Ulla Connor and Thomas A. Upton (eds.), Discourse in the professions: perspectives from corpus linguistics. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 203–34.
Biber, Douglas 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge University Press.
Biber, Douglas 2009. Are there linguistic consequences of literacy? Comparing the potentials of language use in speech and writing. In David Olson and Nancy Torrance (eds.), Cambridge handbook of literacy, 75–91. Cambridge University Press.
Biber, Douglas and Victoria Clark 2002. Historical shifts in modification patterns with complex noun phrase structures: how long can you go without a verb? In Teresa Fanego, María José López-Couso and Javier Pérez-Guerra (eds.), English historical syntax and morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 43–66.
Biber, Douglas and Susan Conrad 2009. Register, genre, and style. Cambridge University Press.
Biber, Douglas and Edward Finegan 1997. Diachronic relations among speech-based and written registers in English. In Terttu Nevalainen and Leena Kahlas-Tarkka (eds.), To explain the present: studies in changing English in honor of Matti Rissanen. Helsinki: Societé Néophilologique, 253–76. Reprinted in Susan Conrad and Douglas Biber (eds.) 2001, Variation in English: multi-dimensional studies. London: Longman, 66–83.
Biber, Douglas and Bethany Gray 2010. Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9, 2–20.
Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad and Randi Reppen 2011. Grammatical change in the noun phrase: the influence of written language use. English Language and Linguistics 15:2, 223–59.
Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad and Randi Reppen 1998. Corpus linguistics: investigating language structure and use. Cambridge University Press.
Biber, Douglas, Edward Finegan and Dwight Atkinson 1994. ARCHER and its challenges: compiling and exploring ‘A Representative Corpus of of Historical English Registers’. In Udo Fries, Gunnel Tottie and Peter Schneider (eds.), Creating and using English language corpora. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1–14.
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
Binnick, Robert I. 1971. ‘Will’ and ‘be going to’. Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society 7, 40–51. Reprinted 1974, in Werner Baueret al. (eds.), Studien zur generativen Semantik. Frankfurt am Main: Athenaion, 118–30.
Bisang, Walter 2009. On the evolution of complexity: sometimes less is more in East and mainland Southeast Asia. In Geoffrey Sampson, David Gil and Peter Trudgill (eds.), Language complexity as an evolving variable. Oxford University Press, 34–49.
Black, Michael 1977. An investigation into factors influencing the choice between the syllabic and contracted form of is. In Wolf-Dietrich Bald and Robert Ilson (eds.), Studies in English usage: the resources of a Present-Day English for linguistic analysis. Frankfurt and Bern: Peter Lang, 171–83.
Blakemore, Diane 1990/91. Performatives and parentheticals. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 91, 197–213.
Blevins, James P. and Juliette Blevins 2009. Introduction: analogy in grammar. In James P. Blevins and Juliette Blevins (eds.), Analogy in grammar: form and acquisition. Oxford University Press, 1–12.
Bolinger, Dwight 1980. Wanna and the gradience of auxiliaries. In Gunter Brettschneider and Christian Lehmann (eds.), Wege zur Universalienforschung: Sprachwissenschaftliche Beiträge zum 60. Geburtstag von Hansjakob Seiler. Tübingen: Narr, 292–99.
Bolinger, Dwight 1986. Intonation and its parts: melody in spoken English. Stanford University Press.
Bowers, Frederick 1989. Linguistic Aspects of Legislative Expression. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Bowie, Jill and Bas Aarts 2012. Change in the English infinitival perfect construction. In Terttu Nevalainen and Elizabeth Traugott (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English. New York: Oxford University Press, 200–10.
Bowie, Jill, Sean A. Wallis and Bas Aarts forthcoming. Contemporary change in modal usage in spoken British English: mapping the impact of ‘genre’. In Johan van der Auwera and Juana I. M arin Arrese (eds.), Current issues on evidentiality and modality in English: theoretical, descriptive and contrastive studies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Boye, Kasper and Peter Harder 2007. Complement-taking predicates: usage and linguistic structure. Studies in Language 31, 569–606.
Boyland, Joyce T. 1996. Morphosyntactic change in progress: a psycholinguistic treatment. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
Brainerd, Barron 1989. The contractions of not: a historical note. Journal of English Lingusitics 22, 176–96.
Brinton, Laurel J. 1988. The development of English aspectual systems: aspectualizers and postverbal particles. Cambridge University Press.
Brinton, Laurel J. 1991. The origin and development of quasimodal ‘have to’ in English. The Workshop on Verbal Periphrases. Amsterdam.
Brinton, Laurel J. 1996. Pragmatic markers in English: grammaticalization and discourse functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Brinton, Laurel J. 2008. The comment clause in English: syntactic origins and pragmatic development. Cambridge University Press.
Brinton, Laurel and Margary Fee 2001. Canadian English. In John Algeo (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. vi: English in North America. Cambridge University Press, 422–40.
Brinton, Laurel J. and Elizabeth Closs Traugott 2005. Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge University Press.
Bromhead, Helen 2006. The reign of truth and faith: epistemic expressions in 16th and 17th century English. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Brown, Keith and Martin Millar 1980. Auxiliary verbs in Edinburgh speech. Transactions of the Philological Society, 81–133.
Buchstaller, Isabelle 2001. An alternative view of like: its grammaticalisation in conversational American English and beyond. Edinburgh Working Papers in Applied Linguistics 11, 21–41.
Buchstaller, Isabelle and Alexandra D'Arcy 2009. Localized globalization: a multi-local, multivariate investigation of quotative be like. Journal of Sociolinguistics 13:3, 291–331.
Bussmann, Hadumod 1996. Routledge dictionary of language and linguistics. London and New York: Routledge.
Bybee, Joan. 1985. Diagrammatic iconicity in stem-inflection relations. In John Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in syntax. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 11–48.
Bybee, Joan. 2001. Frequency effects on French liaison. In Joan Bybee and Paul Hopper (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 331–60.
Bybee, Joan. 2003. Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: the role of frequency. In Brian D. Joseph and Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 602–23.
Bybee, Joan. 2005. The impact of usage on representation: grammar is usage and usage is grammar. Presidential Address at the 79th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Oakland, USA.
Bybee, Joan. 2006. From usage to grammar: the mind's response to repetition. Language 82:4, 711–33.
Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, usage, and cognition. Cambridge University Press.
Bybee, Joan. 2011. Usage-based theory and grammaticalization. In Bernd Heine and Heiko Narrog (eds.), Handbook of grammaticalization. Oxford University Press.
Bybee, Joan and Östen Dahl 1989. The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the world. Studies in Language 13, 51–103.
Bybee, Joan and William Pagliuca 1987. The evolution of future meaning. In A. G. Ramat, O. Carruba and G. Bernini (eds.), The evolution of future meaning: papers from the 7th international conference on historical linguistics. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 107–22.
Bybee, Joan and Sandra Thompson 1997. Three frequency effects in syntax. Berkeley Linguistics Society 23, 65–75.
Bybee, Joan, Revere D. Perkins and William Pagliuca 1994. The evolution of grammar: tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. University of Chicago Press.
Callies, Marcus 2011. Patterns of direct transitivization and differences between British and American English. Paper presented at ICAME 32 – Trends and Traditions in English Corpus Linguistics. In Honour of Stig Johansson, 1–5 June 2011, Oslo, Norway.
Callies, Marcus 2012. The grammaticalization and pragmaticalization of cleft constructions in Present-Day English. In Sebastian Hoffmann, Paul Rayson and Geoffrey Leech (eds.), Corpus linguistics: looking back – moving forward. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 5–21.
Castillo González, Pilar 2007. Uncontracted negatives and negative constructions in contemporary English: a corpus-based study. Santiago de Compostela: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela [CD-ROM].
Celle, Agnès and Nicholas Smith 2010. Beyond aspect: will be -ing and shall be -ing. English Language and Linguistics 14:2, 239–69.
Chambers, J. K. 1991. Canada. In Jenny Cheshire (ed.), English around the world. Cambridge University Press, 89–107.
Chambers, J. K. 1995. The Canada–U.S. border as a vanishing isogloss: the evidence of chesterfield. Journal of English Linguistics 23, 155–66.
Chambers, J. K. 1998. Social embedding of changes in progress. Journal of English Linguistics 26, 5–36.
Chambers, J. K. 2002. Patterns of variation including change. In James K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill and Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds.), The handbook of language variation and change. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell, 349–72.
Chambers, J. K. 2004. ‘Canadian Dainty’: the rise and decline of Briticisms in Canada. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), The legacy of colonial English: studies in transported dialects. Cambridge University Press, 224–41.
Charrow, Robert and Veda R. Charrow 1979. Making legal language understandable: a psycholinguistic study of jury instructions. Columbia Law Review 79, 1306–74.
Christ, Oliver 1994. A modular and flexible architecture for an integrated corpus query system. Proceedings of COMPLEX '94: Third Conference on Computational Lexicography and Text Research (Budapest, July 7–10, 1994). Budapest, 23–32.
Close, Joanne and Bas Aarts 2010. Current change in the modal system of English: a case study of must, have to and have got to. In Ursula Lenker, Judith Huber and Robert Mailhammer (eds.), English historical linguistics 2008: selected papers from the Fifteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 15), Munich 24–30 August 2008, vol. i: The history of English verbal and nominal constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 165–81.
Coates, Jennifer 1983. The semantics of the modal auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.
Collins, Peter C. 2005. The modals and quasi-modals of obligation and necessity in Australian English and other Englishes. English World-Wide 26:3, 279–3.
Coates, Jennifer 2009a. Modals and quasi-modals in English (Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics 67). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Coates, Jennifer 2009b. The progressive. In Pam Peters, Peter Collins and Adam Smith (eds.), Comparative studies in Australian and New Zealand English: grammar and beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 115–23.
Comrie, Bernard 1976. Aspect. Cambridge University Press.
Conrad, Susan and Douglas Biber 2000. Adverbial marking of stance in speech and writing. In Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson (eds.), Evaluation in text. Oxford University Press, 56–73.
Cort, Alison and David Denison 2005. The category modal – a moving target? Paper presented at the First International Conference on the Linguistics of Contemporary English, University of Edinburgh.
Coulthard, Michael and Alison Johnson 2007. An introduction to forensic linguistics: language in evidence. London: Routledge.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth 1986. An introduction to English prosody. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth 1995. On the foregrounded progressive in American conversational narrative: a new development? In Wolfgang Riehle and Hugo Keiper (eds.), Anglistentag 1994 Graz: proceedings. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 229–45.
Cousineau, Carol and
Roger Peters 2000.
Plain English in Michigan statutes and rules.
Michigan Bar Journal 79:1. At:
http://tinyurl.com/3g8h5zq (last accessed 1 June 2010).
Crespo García, Begoña and Isabel Moskowich-Spiegel Fandiño 2010. CETA in the context of the Coruña Corpus. Literary and Linguistic Computing 25:2, 153–64.
Croft, William 2001. Radical construction grammar: syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford University Press.
Croft, William and D. Alan Cruse 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
Crowell, Thomas L. 1955. Predating ‘have to’, ‘must’?American Speech 30:1, 68–9.
Crowell, Thomas L. 1959. ‘Have got’, a pattern preserver. American Speech 34:2, 280–6.
Crystal, David and Derek Davy 1969. Investigating English style. London: Longman.
Cuyckens, Hubert and Hendrik De Smet 2007. For. . .to-infinitives from Early to Late Modern English. Linguistic Insights – Studies in Language and Communication 28, 77–103.
Dahl, Östen 1985. Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Blackwell.
Danchev, Andrei and Merja Kytö 1994. The construction be going to + infinitive in Early Modern English. In Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), Studies in Early Modern English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 59–77.
D'Arcy, Alexandra 2004. Contextualizing St John's Youth English within the Canadian quotative system. Journal of English Linguistics 32:4, 323–45.
D'Arcy, Alexandra and Sali A. Tagliamonte 2010. Prestige, accommodation and the legacy of relative who. Language in Society 39:3, 1–28.
Darmstadter, Howard 2008. Hereof, thereof and everywhereof: a contrarian guide to legal drafting. Chicago: ABA Publishing.
Davies, Mark 2000. Syntactic diffusion in Spanish and Portuguese infinitival complements. In S. Dworkin and D. Wanner (eds.), New approaches to old problems: issues in Romance historical linguistics. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 109–27.
Davies, Mark 2002. Esto es ligero de fazer: object to subject raising in Medieval and Early Modern Spanish. In J. F. Leeet al. (eds.), Structure, meaning, and acquisition of Spanish. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 19–31.
Davies, Mark 2003. Diachronic shifts and register variation with the ‘lexical subject of infinitive’ construction (Para yo hacerlo). In S. Montrul and F. Ordóñez (eds.), Linguistic theory and language development in Hispanic languages. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 13–29.
Davies, Mark 2004a. Student use of large, annotated corpora to analyze syntactic variation. In Guy Astonet al. (eds.), Corpora and language learners. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 259–69.
Davies, Mark 2004b. Student use of large corpora to investigate language change. In T. Uptonet al. (eds.), Applied corpus linguistics: a multidimensional perspective. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 207–22.
Davies, Mark 2004–.
BYU-BNC: British National Corpus: 100 million words, 1980s–1993. Available online at
http://corpus.byu.edu/bnc.
Davies, Mark 2005. The advantage of using relational databases for large corpora: speed, advanced queries, and unlimited annotation. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 10, 301–28.
Davies, Mark 2007–10.
Time Magazine Corpus of American English: 100 million words, 1920s–2000s. Available online at
http://corpus.byu.edu/time.
Davies, Mark 2008–.
Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 410+ million words, 1990–present. Available online at
www.americancorpus.org.
Davies, Mark 2008. Spanish and Portuguese corpus linguistics. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 1, 149–86.
Davies, Mark 2009. The 385+ million word Corpus of Contemporary American English (1990–2008+): design, architecture, and linguistic insights. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14:2, 159–90.
Davies, Mark 2010a. Creating useful historical corpora: a comparison of CORDE, the Corpus del Español, and the Corpus do Português. In A. Enrique-Arias (ed.), Diacronía de las lenguas iberorromances: nuevas perspectivas desde la lingüística de corpus. Frankfurt and Madrid: Vervuert/Iberoamericana, 137–66.
Davies, Mark 2010b. The Corpus of Contemporary American English as the first reliable monitor corpus of English. Literary and Linguistic Computing 25:4, 447–64.
De Smet, Hendrik 2008. Diffusional change in the English system of complementation: gerunds, participles and for. . .to-infinitives. Unpublished dissertation, University of Leuven.
Declerck, Renaat 1991. Tense in English: its structure and use in discourse. London: Routledge.
Declerck, Renaat 2010. Future time reference expressed by BE to in Present-Day English. English Language and Linguistics 14:2, 271–91.
Declerck, Renaat and Susan Reed 2001. Conditionals: a comprehensive empirical analysis (Topics in English Linguistics 37). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Declerck, Renaat and Susan Reed 2005. What is modal about I thought that . . .?English Language and Linguistics 9:2, 311–32.
Declerck, Renaat (in co-operation with Susan Reed and Bert Cappelle) 2006. The grammar of the English verb phrase, vol. 1: The grammar of the English tense system: a comprehensive analysis (Topics in English Linguistics 60:1). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dehé, Nicole and Anne Wichmann 2010. The multifunctionality of epistemic parentheticals in discourse: prosodic cues to the semantic–pragmatic boundary. Functions of Language 17:1, 1–28.
Denison, David 1993. English historical syntax: verbal constructions. London: Longman.
Denison, David 1998. Syntax. In Suzanne Romaine (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. iv: 1776–1997. Cambridge University Press, 92–329.
Denison, David 2001. Gradience and linguistic change. In Laurel J. Brinton (ed.), Historical linguistics 1999. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 119–44.
Denison, David 2004. Do grammars change when they leak? In Christian Kay, Simon Horobin and Jeremy Smith (eds.), New perspectives on English historical linguistics. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 15–29.
Dennis, Leah 1940. The progressive tense: frequency of its use in English. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 55, 855–65.
Diessel, Holger and Michael Tomasello 2001. The acquisition of finite complement clauses in English: a corpus-based analysis. Cognitive Linguistics 12, 97–141.
Diewald, Gabriele 2011. Pragmaticalization (defined) as grammaticalization of discourse functions. Linguistics 49: 2, 365–90.
Dollinger, Stefan 2006. The modal auxiliaries have to and must in the ‘Corpus of Early Ontario English’: gradient changes and colonial lag in Early Canadian English. In Peter Avery, Alexandra D'Arcy, Elaine Gold and Keren Rice (eds.), Canadian English in a global context, special issue of Canadian Journal of Linguistics 51: 2–3, 287–308.
Duffley, Patrick J. 1992. The English infinitive. London: Longman.
Duffley, Patrick J. 1994. Need and dare: the black sheep of the modal family. Lingua 94, 213–43.
Duffley, Patrick J. 2000. Gerund versus infinitive as complements of transitive verbs in English: the problems of ‘tense’ and ‘control’. Journal of English Linguistics 28, 221–48.
Duffley, Patrick J. 2001. Verbs of tolerance with the gerund and the infinitive. Lacus Forum 37, 87–92.
Duffley, Patrick J. 2003. The gerund and the to-infinitive as subject. Journal of English Linguistics 31, 324–52.
Duffley, Patrick J. 2004a. The infinitive and the -ing as complements of verbs of positive and negative recall. In G. Bergh, J. Herriman and M. Mobärg (eds.), An international master of syntax and semantics. Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, 69–78.
Duffley, Patrick J. 2004b. Verbs of liking with the infinitive and the gerund. English Studies 85, 358–80.
Duffley, Patrick J. and Rafika Abida 2009. Complementation with verbs of choice in English. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 54, 1–26.
Duffley, Patrick J. and Ryan Fisher 2005. Verb + to + infinitive vs. verb + to + gerund-participle: a preliminary exploration. Langues et Linguistique 31, 31–61.
Duffley, Patrick J. and Rachel Tremblay 1994. The infinitive and the -ing as complements of verbs of effort. English Studies 75, 566–75.
Dunning, Ted 1993. Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Computational Linguistics 19:1, 61–74.
Eastwood, John 1994. Oxford guide to English grammar. Oxford University Press.
Egan, Thomas 2008. Non-finite complementation: a usage-based study of infinitive and -ing clauses in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Elsness, Johan 1994. On the progression of the progressive in early Modern English. ICAME Journal 18, 5–25.
Elsness, Johan 1997. The perfect and the preterite in contemporary and earlier English. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Elsness, Johan 2009a. The present perfect and the preterite. In Günter Rohdenburg and Julia Schlüter (eds.), One language, two grammars? Differences between British and American English (Studies in English Language). Cambridge University Press, 228–45.
Elsness, Johan 2009b. The perfect and the preterite in Australian and New Zealand English. In Pam Peters, Peter Collins and Adam Smith (eds.), Comparative studies in Australian and New Zealand English: grammar and beyond. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 89–114.
Engel, Dulcie M. and Marie-Eve A. Ritz 2000. The use of the present perfect in Australian English. Australian Journal of Linguistics 20:2, 119–40.
Erdmann, P. 1993. Die for . . . to-Konstruktion nach dem Verb want. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 41, 124–32.
Erman, Britt and Ulla-Britt Kotsinas 1993. Pragmaticalization: the case of ba and you know. Studier I modern språkvetenskap (New series 10, Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis). Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell, 76–93.
European Commission Directorate-General for Translation 2010.
English style guide: a handbook for authors and translators in the European Commission. At
http://tinyurl.com/68m84ws (last accessed 31 March 2011).
Evans, Vyvyan and Melanie Green 2006. Cognitive linguistics: an introduction. Edinburgh University Press.
Facchinetti, Roberta, Manfred Krug and Frank Palmer (eds.) 2003. Modality in contemporary English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Fairclough, Norman 1992. Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity.
Fanego, Teresa 1996. On the historical development of English retrospective verbs. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 97, 71–9.
Fanego, Teresa 1997. On patterns of complementation with verbs of effort. English Studies 78, 60–7.
Fanego, Teresa 2007. Drift and the development of sentential complements in British and American English from 1700 to the present day. Linguistic Insights – Studies in Language and Communication 28, 161–235.
Ferguson, Charles 1971. Absence of copula and the notion of simplicity: a study of normal speech, baby talk, foreigner talk and pidgins. In Del Hymes (ed.), Pidginization and creolization of languages. Cambridge University Press, 141–50.
Fillmore, Charles J. and D. Terence Langendoen (eds.) 1971. Studies in linguistic semantics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Finegan, Edward 1995. Subjectivity and subjectivisation: and introduction. In Dieter Stein and Susan Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: linguistic perspectives. Cambridge University Press, 1–15.
Finegan, Edward and Douglas Biber 1995. That and zero complementisers in Late Modern English: exploring ARCHER from 1650–1990. In Bas Aarts and Charles M. Meyer (eds.), The verb in contemporary English: theory and description. Cambridge University Press, 241–57.
Firebaugh, Joseph J. 1940. The vocabulary of Time magazine. American Speech 15:3, 232–42.
Fischer, Kerstin and Anatol Stefanowitsch 2007. Konstruktionsgrammatik: ein Überblick. In Kerstin Fischer and Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik: von der Anwendung zur Theorie. Tübingen: Stauffenburg, 3–17.
Fischer, Olga 1988. The rise of the for NP to V construction: an explanation. In G. Nixon and J. Honey (eds.), An historic tongue: studies in English linguistics in memory of Barbara Strang. London: Routledge, 67–88.
Fischer, Olga 1995. The distinction between to and bare infinitival complements in late middle English. Diachronica 12:1, 1–30.
Fischer, Olga 1997. Infinitive marking in Late Middle English: transitivity and changes in the English system of case. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Studies in Middle English linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 109–34.
Fischer, Olga 2000. Grammaticalisation: unidirectional, non-reversible? The case of to before the infinitive in English. In Olga Fischer, Annette Rosenbach and Dieter Stein (eds.), Pathways of change. grammaticalization in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 149–69.
Fischer, Olga 2007. Morphosyntactic change: functional and formal perspectives. Oxford University Press.
Fischer, Olga and Wim van der Wurff 2006. Syntax. In Richard Hogg and David Denison (eds.), A history of the English language. Cambridge University Press, 109–98.
Foley, Richard 2001. Going out of style? Shall in EU legal English. Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Conference 2001, University of Lancaster, 185–95.
Fowler, Francis G. 1927. A dictionary of modern English usage. Oxford: Clarendon.
Fowler, Henry W. and Francis G. Fowler 1931. The King's English. Oxford: Clarendon.
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt, Marion Bond, Lori Heintzelman, Dan Keller, Saeko Ogihara and Erin Shay 2008. Toward an understanding of the progressive form in English. In Werner Abraham and Elisabeth Leiss (eds.), Modality–aspect interfaces. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 81–96.
Francis, W. Nelson 1965. A standard corpus of edited Present-Day American English. College English 26, 267–73.
Fraser, Bruce 1975. Hedged performatives. In P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press, 187–210.
Fried, Mirjam and Jan-Ola Östman 2004. Construction Grammar: a thumbnail sketch. In Mirjam Fried and Jan-Ola Östman (eds.), Construction Grammar in a cross-language perspective. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 11–86.
Garside, Roger and Nicholas Smith 1997. A hybrid grammatical tagger: CLAWS 4. In Roger Garside, Geoffrey Leech and Anthony McEnery (eds.) 1997. Corpus annotation: linguistic information from computer text corpora. Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman, 102–21.
Gasparrini, Désirée 2001. It isn't, it is not or it's not? Regional differences in contraction in spoken British English. Master's thesis, University of Zürich.
Givón, Talmy 1980. The binding hierarchy and the typology of complements. Studies in Language 4, 333–77.
Givón, Talmy 1989. Mind, code and context. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Givón, Talmy 1991. Isomorphism in the grammatical code. Studies in Language 15, 85–114.
Goldberg, Adele 1995. Constructions: a Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago University Press.
Givón, Talmy 2006. Constructions at work: the nature of generalization in language. Oxford University Press.
Görlach, Manfred 1991. Introduction to Early Modern English. Cambridge University Press.
Gorrell, Robert 1995. The future of past tenses. English Today 11:4, 25–7.
Gotti, Maurizio 2001. Semantic and pragmatic values of shall and will in Early Modern English Statutes. In Maurizio Gotti and Marina Dossena (eds.), Modality in specialized texts. Bern: Peter Lang, 89–111.
Gotti, Maurizio 2003. Shall and will in contemporary English. In Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug and Frank Palmer (eds.), Modality in contemporary English. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 267–300.
Greenbaum, Sidney 1977. Judgments of syntactic acceptability and frequency. Studia Linguistica 31, 83–105.
Greenbaum, Sidney, Gerald Nelson and Michael Weitzman 1996. Complement clauses in English. In Jenny Thomas and Mick Short (eds.), Using corpora for language research. London: Longman, 76–91.
Gries, Stefan Th. 2006. Exploring variability within and between corpora: some methodological considerations. Corpora 1:2, 109–51.
Gries, Stefan Th. 2009. Statistics for linguistics with R: a practical introduction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gries, Stefan Th. and Anatol Stefanowitsch 2003. Co-varying collexemes in the into-causative. In Michel Achard and Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Language, culture, and mind. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 225–36.
Gries, Stefan Th. and Anatol Stefanowitsch 2004. Extending collostructional analysis: a corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9:1, 97–129.
Haegeman, Lilliane 1981. The use of will and the expression of futurity in Present-day British English. Part 1: Future time expression in a corpus of Standard British English. D.Phil. dissertation, University College London.
Haegeman, Liliane 1989. Be going to and will: a pragmatic account. Journal of Linguistics 25, 291–317.
Haiman, John 1983. Iconic and economic motivation. Language 59:4, 781–819.
Haiman, John 1985. Natural syntax. Cambridge University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1988. On the ineffability of grammatical categories. In J. D. Benson, M. J. Cummings and W. S. Greaves (eds.), Linguistics in a systemic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 27–51.
Halliday, M. A. K. 2004. The language of science. London: Continuum.
Hardie, Andrew forthcoming. CQPweb – combining power, flexibility and usability in a corpus analysis tool.
Haspelmath, Martin 1989. From purposive to infinitive – a universal path of grammaticalization. Folia Linguistics Historica 10, 287–310.
Haspelmath, Martin 1998. Does grammaticalization need reanalysis?Studies in Language 22:2, 315–51.
Haugen, Einar 1972. The ecology of language: language science and national development. In Anwar S. Dil (ed.), The ecology of language: essays by Einar Haugen. Stanford University Press.
Hawkins, John A. 1986. A comparative typology of English and German: unifying the contrasts. London and Sydney: Croom Helm/Routledge.
Heffer, Chris 2005. The language of jury trial: a corpus-aided analysis of legal–lay discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Heine, Bernd 1993. Auxiliaries: cognitive forces and grammaticalization. Oxford University Press.
Heine, Bernd 1994. Grammaticalization as an explanatory parameter. In William Pagliuca (ed.), Perspectives on grammaticalization. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 255–87.
Heine, Bernd 2003. Grammaticalization. In Bryan D. Joseph and Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics. Malden, MA, and Oxford: Blackwell, 575–601.
Heine, Bernd and Tania Kuteva 2002. The world lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.
Heine, Bernd and Tania Kuteva 2006. The changing languages of Europe. Oxford University Press.
Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi and Friederike Hünnemeyer 1991. Grammaticalization: a conceptual framework. University of Chicago Press.
Hengeveld, Kees 1992. Non-verbal predication. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hiller, Ulrich 1987. She isn't studying vs. She's not studying. Die Neueren Sprachen 86, 531–53.
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2004. Lexicalization and grammaticalization: opposite or orthogonal? In Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann and Björn Wiemer (eds.), What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 21–42.
Hirtle, Walter and Claude Bégin 1990. to be in the progressive: a new use. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 35, 1–11.
Hock, Hans Henrich and Brian D. Joseph 1996. Language history, language change, and language relationship. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
Hommerberg, Charlotte and Gunnel Tottie 2007. Try to or try and? Verb complementation in British and American English. ICAME Journal 31:1, 45–64.
Hooper, Joan B. 1975. On assertive predicates. In John P. Kimball (ed.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 4. New York: Academic Press, 91–124.
Hopper, Paul J. 1991. On some principles of grammaticization. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. 1: Focus on theoretical and methodological issues. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 17–35.
Hopper, Paul J. and Elizabeth C. Traugott 2003 [1993]. Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.
Huber, Magnus 2007. The Old Bailey Proceedings, 1674–1834: evaluating and annotating a corpus of 18th- and 19th-century spoken English. In Anneli Meurman-Solin and Arja Nurmi (eds.), Annotating variation and change (Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English1). University of Helsinki.
Hübler, Axel 1998. The expressivity of grammar: grammatical devices expressing emotion across time. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Huddleston, Rodney and Geoffrey K. Pullumet al. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge University Press.
Hughes, Arthur, Peter Trudgill and Dominic Watt 2005 [1979]. English accents and dialects: an introduction to social and regional varieties of English in the British Isles. London: Edward Arnold.
Hundt, Marianne 2004a. Animacy, agentivity, and the spread of the progressive in Modern English. English Language and Linguistics 8:1, 47–69.
Hundt, Marianne 2004b. The passival and the progressive passive: a case study of layering in the English aspect and voice systems. In Hans Lindquist and Christian Mair (eds.), Corpus approaches to grammaticalization in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 79–120.
Hundt, Marianne and Christian Mair 1999. ‘Agile’ and ‘uptight’ genres: the corpus-based approach to language change in progress. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 4, 221–42.
Hundt, Marianne and Nicholas Smith 2009. The present perfect in British and American English: has there been any change, recently?ICAME Journal 33, 45–63.
Hundt, Marianne, Nadja Nesselhauf and Carolin Biewer (eds.) 2007. Corpus linguistics and the web. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.
Hunston, Susan and Gill Francis 2000. Pattern grammar: a corpus-driven approach to the lexical grammar of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ifantidou, Elly 2001. Evidentials and relevance. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Jankowski, Bridget L. 2004. A transatlantic perspective of variation and change in English deontic modality. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 23, 85–114.
Jankowski, Bridget L. 2005. ‘We've got our own little ways of doing things here’: cross-variety variation, change and divergence in the English stative possessive. Generals Paper, University of Toronto.
Jespersen, Otto H. 1917. Negation in English and in other languages. Copenhagen: Ejnar Munksgaard.
Jespersen, Otto H. 1909–49. A modern English grammar on historical principles, vol iv. Copenhagen: Eijnar Munksgaard.
Jespersen, Otto H. 1954. A modern English grammar on historical principles, vol iii, part 4. London: Bradford and Dickens.
Jespersen, Otto H. 1961a. A modern English grammar on historical principles, vol vi: Morphology. London: Bradford and Dickens.
Jespersen, Otto H. 1961b. Present tense. A modern English grammar on historical principles, vol iv. London: Bradford and Dickens, 46–59.
Johansson, Stig, Geoffrey Leech and Helen Goodluck 1978. Manual of information for the Lancaster–Oslo/Bergen Corpus for Digital Computers. Oslo: University of Oslo.
Johansson, Stig and Signe Oksefjell 1996. Towards a unified account of the syntax and semantics of get. In Jenny Thomas and Michael Short (eds.), Using corpora for language research: studies in honour of Geoffrey Leech. London: Longman, 57–75.
Jones, Daniel 1969. Everyman's English pronouncing dictionary. London: Dent.
Jones, Daniel 2006 [1997]. Cambridge English pronouncing dictionary, ed. Peter Roach, James Hartman and Jane Setter. Cambridge University Press.
Jucker, Andreas H. 1992. Social stylistics: syntactic variation in English newspapers. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kager, René 1999. Optimality theory. Cambridge University Press.
Kaisse, Ellen M. 1985. Connected speech: the interaction of syntax and phonology. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Kaltenböck, Gunther 2008. Prosody and function of English comment clauses. Folia Linguistica 42:1, 83–134.
Kaltenböck, Gunther 2009. English comment clauses: position, prosody, and scope. Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 34:1, 49–75.
Kaltenböck, Gunther 2010. Pragmatic functions of parenthetical I think. In Gunther Kaltenböck, Wiltrud Mihatsch and Stefan Schneider (eds.), New approaches to hedging. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 243–72.
Kaltenböck, Gunther 2011. Linguistic structure and use: explaining diverging evidence: the case of clause-initial I think. In Doris Schönefeld (ed.), Converging evidence – discussing and extending the methodological tool-kit of the linguist. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kärkkäinen, Elise 2003. Epistemic stance in English conversation: a description of its interactional functions, with a focus on I think. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kärkkäinen, Elise 2007. The role of I guess in conversational stance taking. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: subjectivity, evaluation, interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 183–219.
Kärkkäinen, Elise 2010. Position and scope of epistemic phrases in planned and unplanned American English. In Gunther Kaltenböck, Wiltrud Mihatsch and Stefan Schneider (eds.), New approaches to hedging. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 207–41.
Kay, Paul and Charles J. Fillmore 1999. Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: the What's X doing Y? construction. Language 75, 1–34.
Kearns, Kate 2003. Durative achievements and individual-level predicates on events. Linguistics and Philosophy 26:5, 595–635.
Kearns, Kate 2007. Epistemic verbs and zero complementizer. English Language and Linguistics 11, 475–505.
Kenyon, John S. and Thomas A. Knott 1953. A pronouncing dictionary of American English. Springfield, MA: Merriam.
Killie, Kristin 2004. Subjectivity and the English progressive. English Language and Linguistics 8:1, 25–46.
Killie, Kristin2008. From locative to durative to focalized? The English progressive and ‘PROG imperfective drift’. In Maurizio Gotti, Marina Dossena and R. Dury (eds.), English historical linguistics 2006: selected papers from the Fourteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 14), Bergamo, 21–25 August 2006, vol. i: Syntax and morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 69–88.
Kjellmer, Göran 1985. Help to/help Ø revisited. English Studies 66, 156–61.
Kjellmer, Göran 1998. On contraction in Modern English. Studia Neophilologica 69, 155–86.
Kjellmer, Göran 2000. Auxiliary marginalities: the case of try. In John M. Kirk (ed.), Corpora galore: analyses and techniques in describing English. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 115–24.
Klein, Wolfgang 1994. Time in language. London: Routledge.
Klima, Edward S. 1964. Negation in English. In Jerry A. Fodor and Jerrold J. Katz (eds.), The structure of language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 246–323.
König, Ekkehard 1980. On the context-dependence of the progressive in English. In Christian Rohrer (ed.), Time, tense, and quantifiers: proceedings of the Stuttgart Conference on the Logic of Tense and Quantification. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 269–91.
König, Ekkehard 1995. He is being obscure: non-verbal predication and the progressive. In Pier Marco Bertinetto, Valentina Bianchi, Östen Dahl and Mario Squartini (eds.), Temporal reference, aspect, and actionality, vol. ii: Typological approaches. Turin: Rosenberg and Sellier, 155–67.
König, Ekkehard and Volker Gast 2009. Understanding English–German contrasts. Berlin: Schmidt.
Kranich, Svenja 2007. Subjectification and the English progressive: the history of ALWAYS + progressive constructions. York Papers in Linguistics (series 2) 8, 120–37.
Kranich, Svenja 2008. Subjective progressives in seventeenth and eighteenth century English: secondary grammaticalization as a process of objectification. In M. Gotti, M. Dossena and R. Dury (eds.), English historical linguistics 2006: selected papers from the Fourteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 14), Bergamo, 21–25 August 2006, vol. i: Syntax and morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 241–56.
Kranich, Svenja 2009. Interpretative progressives in Late Modern English. In I. Tieken-Boon van Ostade and W. Van der Wurff (eds.), Current issues in Late Modern English. Bern: Lang, 331–57.
Kranich, Svenja 2010a. The progressive in Modern English: a corpus-based study of grammaticalization and related changes. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Kranich, Svenja 2010b. Grammaticalization, subjectification and objectification. In K. Stathi, E. Gehweiler and E. König (eds.), Grammaticalization: current views and issues. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 101–21.
Kroch, Anthony S. 1989. Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1:3, 199–244.
Krug, Manfred 1998a. Gotta – the tenth central modal in English? Social, stylistic and regional variation in the British National Corpus as evidence of ongoing grammaticalization. In H. Lindquist, S. Klintborg, M. Levin and M. Estling (eds.), The major varieties of English. Växjö University, 177–91.
Krug, Manfred 1998b. String frequency: a cognitive motivating factor in coalescence, language processing, and linguistic change. Journal of English Linguistics 26, 286–320.
Krug, Manfred 2000. Emerging English modals: a corpus study of grammaticalization. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Krug, Manfred 2002. A path to volitional modality. In Teresa Fanego, Maria José López-Couso and Javier Pérez-Guerra (eds.), English historical syntax and morphology: selected papers from the Eleventh International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 11) 2000 at Santiago de Compostela (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 223). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 131–55.
Krug, Manfred 2003. Frequency as a determinant in grammatical variation and change. In Günther Rohdenbrug and Britta Mondorf (eds.), Determinants of grammatical variation in English. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 7–68.
Krug, Manfred 2005. The quest for grammaticalization parameters. Plenary paper given at the conference ‘From Ideational to Interpersonal: Perspectives from Grammaticalization’, Leuven, Belgium.
Krug, Manfred 2011. Auxiliaries and grammaticalization. In Bernd Heine and Heiko Narrog (eds.), Handbook of grammaticalization. Oxford University Press.
Kytö, Merja and Jonathan Culpeper (eds.) 2010. Speech in writing: explorations in Early Modern English dialogues. Cambridge University Press.
Kytö, Merja and Terry Walker 2006. Guide to a Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
Kÿto, Merja, Juhani Rudanko and Erik Smitterberg 2000. Building a bridge between the present and the past: a corpus of 19th-century English. ICAME Journal 24, 85–97.
Labov, William 1966. The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Labov, William 1969. Contraction, deletion and inherent variability of the English copula. Language 45:4, 715–62.
Labov, William 1970. The study of language in its social context. Studium Generale 23:1, 30–87.
Labov, William 1972. Language in the inner city. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Labov, William 1981. What can be learned about change in progress from synchronic descriptions. In David Sankoff and Henrietta Cedergren (eds.), Variation omnibus. Edmonton: Linguistic Research Inc., 177–200.
Labov, William 1990. The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change 2:2, 205–254.
Labov, William 2001. Principles of linguistic change, vol. 2: Social factors. Malden, MA, and Oxford: Blackwell.
Lavandera, Beatriz 1978. Where does the sociolinguistic variable stop?Language in Society 7:2, 171–82.
Leech, Geoffrey 2003. Modality on the move: the English modal auxiliaries 1961–1992. In Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug and Frank Palmer (eds.), Modality in contemporary English. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 223–40.
Leech, Geoffrey 2004a. Recent grammatical change in English: data, description, theory. In Karin Aijmer and Bengt Altenberg (eds.), Advances in corpus linguistics: papers from the Twenty-Third International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 23). Amsterdam: Rodopi, 61–81.
Leech, Geoffrey 2004b [1971]. Meaning and the English verb, 3rd edn. London: Longman.
Leech, Geoffrey 2011. The modals are declining: reply to Neil Millar's ‘Modal verbs in Time: frequency changes 1923–2006, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14:2 (2009), 191–220’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16:4, 547–64.
Leech, Geoffrey and Nicholas Smith 2005. Extending the possibilities of corpus-based research on English in the twentieth century: a prequel for LOB and F-LOB. ICAME Journal 29, 83–98.
Leech, Geoffrey and Nicholas Smith 2006. Recent grammatical change in written English 1961–1992: some preliminary findings of a comparison of American with British English. In Antoinette Renouf and Andrew Kehoe (eds.), The changing face of corpus linguistics. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi, 185–204.
Leech, Geoffrey and Nicholas Smith 2009. Change and constancy in linguistic change: how grammatical usage in written English evolved in the period 1931–1991. In Antoinette Renouf and Andrew Kehoe (eds.), Corpus linguistics: refinements and reassessments. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi, 173–200.
Leech, Geoffrey, Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair and Nicholas Smith 2009. Change in contemporary English: a grammatical study. Cambridge University Press.
Leech, Geoffrey, Paul Rayson and Andrew Wilson 2001. Word frequencies in written and spoken English. London: Longman.
Lehmann, Christian 1985. Grammaticalization: synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e stile 20:2, 303–18.
Lehmann, Christian 1995 [1982]. Thoughts on grammaticalization. Munich and Newcastle: Lincom Europa.
Levin, Beth 1993. English verb classes and alternations: a preliminary investigation. University of Chicago Press.
Ljung, Magnus 1980. Reflections on the English progressive (Gothenburg Studies in English 46). Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
Lohmann, Arne 2011. Help vs help to: a multifactorial, mixed-effects account of infinitive marker omission. English Language and Linguistics 15:3, 499–521.
López-Couso, María José 2007. Auxiliary and negative cliticisation in Late Modern English. In Javier P érez Guerraet al. (eds.), ‘Of varying language and opposing creed’. new insights into Late. . .creed’: Modern English. Bern: Peter Lang, 301–23.
Los, Bettelou 1998. The rise of the to-infinitive as verb complement. English Language and Linguistics 2:1, 1–36.
Los, Bettelou 2005. The rise of the to-infinitive. Oxford University Press.
Lowth, Robert 1762/1775. A short introduction to English grammar. London: Printed by J. Hughes for A. Millar and J. Dodsley.
MacCormick, Neil D. 1978. Legal reasoning and legal theory. Oxford University Press.
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan 1984. Communicative functions of subordination. In J. L. Mackenzie and H. Wekker (eds.), English language research: The Dutch contribution I. Amsterdam: Free University Press, 67–84.
Mair, Christian 1990. Infinitival complement clauses in English: a study of syntax in discourse. Cambridge University Press.
Mair, Christian 1995. Changing patterns of complementation, and concomitant grammaticalisation, of the verb help in Present-Day British English. In Bas Aarts and Charles F. Meyer (eds.), The verb in contemporary English. Cambridge University Press, 258–72.
Mair, Christian 1997a. The spread of the going-to-future in written English: a corpus-based investigation into language change in progress. In Raymond Hickey and S. Puppel (eds.), Language history and linguistic modelling. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1537–43.
Mair, Christian 1997b. Parallel corpora: a real-time approach to the study of language change in progress. In Magnus Ljung (ed.), Corpus-based studies in English. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi, 195–209.
Mair, Christian 1998. Corpora and the major varieties of English: issues and results. In Hans Lindquist, Staffan Klintborg, Magnus Levin and Maria Estling (eds.), The major varieties of English: papers from MAVEN 97. Växjö: Acta Wexionensia, 139–57.
Mair, Christian 2001. Early or late origin for begin + [V-ing]? Using the OED on CD-ROM to settle a dispute between Visser and Jespersen. Anglia 119, 606–10.
Mair, Christian 2002. Three changing patterns of verb complementation in Late Modern English: a real-time study based on matching text corpora. English Language and Linguistics 6, 105–31.
Mair, Christian 2003. Gerundial complements after begin and start: grammatical and sociolinguistic factors, and how they work against each other. In Günther Rohdenburg and Britta Mondorf (eds.), Determinants of grammatical variation in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 329–45.
Mair, Christian 2004. Corpus linguistics and grammaticalisation theory: statistics, frequencies, and beyond. In Hans Lindquist and Christian Mair (eds.), Corpus approaches to grammaticalisation in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 121–50.
Mair, Christian 2006a. Twentieth-century English: history, variation and standardization (Studies in English Language). Cambridge University Press.
Mair, Christian 2006b. Nonfinite complement clauses in the nineteenth century: the case of remember. In Merja Kytö and Erik Smitterberg (eds.), Nineteenth-century English: stability and change. Cambridge University Press, 215–28.
Mair, Christian 2008. Right in the middle of the S-shaped curve: on the spread of specificational clefts in 20th century English. Paper presented at the First Triennial Conference of the International Society for the Linguistics of English (ISLE 1), Freiburg, 8–11 October 2008.
Mair, Christian and Marianne Hundt 1995. Why is the progressive becoming more frequent in English? A corpus-based investigation of language change in progress. In Wolfgang Riehle and Hugo Keiper (eds.), Anglistentag 1994 Graz: proceedings. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 247–54.
Mair, Christian and Marianne Hundt 1997. The corpus-based approach to language change in progress. In Uwe Böker and Hans Sauer (eds.), Anglistentag 1996 Dresden. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, 71–82.
Mair, Christian, Marianne Hundt, Geoffrey Leech and Nicholas Smith 2003. Short term diachronic shifts in part-of-speech frequencies: a comparison of the tagged LOB and F-LOB corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 7:2, 254–64.
Mair, Christian and Geoffrey Leech 2006. Current changes in English syntax. In Bas Aarts and April McMahon (eds.), The handbook of English linguistics. Malden, MA, and Oxford: Blackwell, 318–42.
Maley, Yon 1994. The language of the law. In John Gibbons (ed.), Language and the Law. London: Longman, 11–50.
Manning, Christopher D. 2003. Probabilistic syntax. In Rens Bod, Jennifer Hay and Stefanie Jannedy (eds.), Probabilistic linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 289–341.
Mattila, Heikki 2006. Comparative legal linguistics. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishers.
McCawley, John 1971. Tense and time reference in English. In Charles J. Fillmore and D. T. Langendoen (eds.), Studies in linguistic semantics. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 96–113.
McElhinny, Bonnie 1993a. Copula and auxiliary contraction in the speech of white Americans. American Speech 68, 371–99.
McElhinny, Bonnie 1993b. The interaction of phonology, syntax and semantics in language change: the history of modal contraction in English. Chicago Linguistics Society 28, 367–81.
McEnery, Anthony and Zhonghua Xiao 2005. help or help to: what do corpora have to say?English Studies 86:2, 161–87.
McFadden, Thomas 2008. Overt subjects of infinitives and for-to in the history of English. Paper presented at the 10th Diachronic Generative Syntax Conference. Cornell University, 7 August 2008.
Mellinkoff, David 1963. The language of the law. Boston and Toronto: Little, Brown and Company.
Michaelis, Laura A. 1998. Aspectual grammar and past-time reference (Routledge Studies in Germanic Linguistics 4). London and New York: Routledge.
Milik, L. 1995. The Century of Prose Corpus: a half-million word historical data base. Computers and the Humanities 29, 327–37.
Millar, Neil 2009. Modal verbs in TIME: frequency changes 1923–2006. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14:2, 191–220.
Miller, Jim 2004. Perfect and resultative constructions in spoken and non-standard English. In Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde and Harry Perridon (eds.), Up and down the cline: the nature of grammaticalization. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 229–246.
Mindt, Dieter 2000. An empirical grammar of the English verb system. Berlin: Cornelsen.
Mindt, Ilka 2003. Is I think a discourse marker. In Ewald Mengel, Hans-Jörg Schmidt and Michael Steppat (eds.), Proceedings of the Conference of the German Association of University Teachers of English 24. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, 473–83.
Mitchell, Bruce 1985. Old English syntax, vol. i. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Mittwoch, Anita 1990. On the distribution of bare infinitive complements in English. Journal of Linguistics 26:1, 103–131.
Molencki, Rafał 2000. Parallelism vs. asymmetry: the case of English counterfactual conditionals. In Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach and Dieter Stein (eds.), Pathways of change: grammaticalization in English (Studies in Language Companion Series 53). Amsterdam: Benjamins, 311–28.
Molencki, Rafał 2003. Proscriptive prescriptivists: on the loss of the ‘pleonastic’ perfect infinitive in counterfactual constructions in Late Modern English. Linguistic Insights: Studies in Language and Communication 7, 175–96.
Montgomery, Michael B. 2001. British and Irish antecedents. In John Algeo (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. vi: English in North America. Cambridge University Press, 86–151.
Mossé, Fernand 1938. Histoire de la forme périphrastique être + participe présent en germanique, 2 vols. Paris: Klincksieck.
Mufwene, Salikoko S. 1996. The founder principle in creole genesis. Diachronica 13:1, 83–134.
Mühlhäusler, Peter and Alvin Fill (eds.) 2000. Reader in ecolinguistics. London: Pinter.
Müller, Friederike 2009. Current changes in the modals of obligation: a multivariate analysis. Paper presented at ICAME 30, University of Lancaster, 27–31 May 2009.
Myhill, John 1995. Change and continuity in the functions of the American English modals. Linguistics 33, 157–211.
Nelson, Gerald, Sean A. Wallis and Bas Aarts 2002. Exploring natural language: working with the British Component of the International Corpus of English. (Varieties of English around the World series). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Nespor, Marina and Irene Vogel 1989. On clashes and lapses. Phonology 6, 69–116.
Nesselhauf, Nadja 2006. The decline of be to and the rise of be going to in Late Modern English: connection or coincidence? In Christoph Houswitschka, Gabriele Knappe and Anja Müller (eds.), Anglistentag 2005 Bamberg: proceedings. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, 515–29.
Nesselhauf, Nadja 2007. The spread of the progressive and its ‘future’ use. English Language and Linguistics 11:1, 191–207.
Nesselhauf, Nadja 2010. The development of future time expressions in Late Modern English: redistribution of forms or change in discourse?English Language and Linguistics 14:2, 163–86.
Nevalainen, Terttu and Leena Kahlas-Tarkka (eds.) 1997. To explain the present: studies in the changing English language in honor of Matti Rissanen. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
Newcombe, Robert G. 1998a. Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. Statistics in Medicine 17, 857–72.
Newcombe, Robert G. 1998b. Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: comparison of eleven methods. Statistics in Medicine 17, 873–90.
Nicolle, Steve 1997. A relevance-theoretic account of be going to. Journal of Linguistics 33:2, 355–77.
Noble, Shawn 1985. To have and have got. Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation, NWAV 14. Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Nokkonen, Soili 2006. The semantic variation of need to in four British English corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 11, 29–71.
Östman, Jan-Ola and Mirjam Fried (eds.) 2005. Construction grammars: cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
The Oxford English dictionary online. Oxford University Press.
www.oed.com Pak, Marjorie 2006. Infinitive marking with for: a diachronic account. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 12, 293–306.
Palander-Collin, Minna 1999. Grammaticalization and social embedding: I think and methinks in Middle and Early Modern English. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
Pérez, Aveline 1990. Time in motion: grammaticalisation of the be going to construction in English. La Trobe University Working Papers in Linguistics 3, 49–64.
Perkins, Michael R. 1983. Modal Expressions in English. London: Frances Pinter; Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Peters, Pam, Peter Collins and Adam Smith (eds.) 2002. New frontiers of corpus research. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.
Poplack, Shana and Sali A. Tagliamonte 1996. The grammaticization of gonna in six varieties of English: a cross-linguistic comparison. Paper presented at NWAVE 25. University of Nevada, Las Vegas.
Poplack, Shana and Sali A. Tagliamonte 1999. The grammaticalization of going to in (African American) English. Language Variation and Change 11:3, 315–42.
Posner, Roland 1973. Redekommentierung. Funk-Kolleg Sprache, vol. 2. Frankfurt: Fischer, 124–33.
Potter, Simeon 1975. Changing English, 2nd edn. London: Deutsch.
Prince, E. F., J. Frader and C. Bosk. 1982. On hedging in physician–physician discourse. In R. J. Di Pietro (ed.), Linguistics and the professions: proceedings of the Second Annual Delaware Symposium on Language Studies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 83–97.
Pustet, Regina 2003. Copulas: universals in the categorization of the lexicon. New York: Oxford University Press.
Quinn, Heidi 2004. Possessivehaveandhave gotin New Zealand English. Paper presented at NWAV 33, University of Michigan.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London and New York: Longman.
Radford, Andrew 2004. English syntax: an introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Rayson, Paul 2003. Matrix: a statistical method and software tool for linguistic analysis through corpus comparison. PhD thesis, Lancaster University.
Řeřicha, Václav 1987. Notes on infinitival and -ing complements of the verbs begin and start. Philologica Pragensia 30, 129–32.
Rice, Wallace 1932. Get and got. American Speech 7:2, 280–96.
Riehle, Wolfgang and Hugo Keiper (eds.) 1995. Anglistentag 1994 Graz: proceedings. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Rissanen, Matti 1991. On the history of that/zero as object clause links in English. In Karin Aijmer and Bengt Altenberg (eds.), English corpus linguistics. London: Longman, 272–89.
Rissanen, Matti 1994. The position of not in Early Modern English Questions. In Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), Studies in Early Modern English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 339–48.
Rissanen, Matti 1999. Isn't it? or Is it not? On the order of postverbal subject and negative particle in the history of English. In Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Gunnel Tottie and Wim van der Wurff (eds.), Negation in the history of English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 189–205.
Rohdenburg, Günter 1996. Cognitive complexity and increased grammatical explicitness in English. Cognitive Linguistics 7, 149–82.
Rohdenburg, Günter 2000. The complexity principle as a factor determining grammatical variation and change in English. In Ingo Plag and Klaus Peter Schneider (eds.), Language use, language acquisition and language history: (mostly) empirical studies in honour of Rüdiger Zimmermann. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, 25–44.
Rohdenburg, Günter 2006a. Processing complexity and competing sentential variants in present-day English. In Wielfried Kürschner and Reinhard Rapp (eds.), Linguistik international: festschrift für Heinrich Weber. Lengerich: Pabst, 51–67.
Rohdenburg, Günter 2006b. The role of functional constraints in the evolution of the English complementation system. Linguistic Insights – Studies in Language and Communication 39, 143–66.
Rohdenburg, Günter 2007. Functional constraints in syntactic change: the rise and fall of prepositional constructions in Early and Late Modern English. English Studies 88, 217–33.
Rohdenburg, Günter 2009a. Nominal complements. In Günter Rohdenburg and Julia Schlüter (eds.), One language, two grammars? Differences between British and American English. Cambridge University Press, 194–211.
Rohdenburg, Günter 2009b. Grammatical divergence between British and American English in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. In Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade and Wim van der Wurff (eds.), Current issues in Late Modern English. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 301–329.
Rohdenburg, Günter and Britta Mondorf (eds.) 2003. Determinants of grammatical variation in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Rohdenburg, Günter and Julia Schlüter 2009a. Introduction. In Günter Rohdenburg and Julia Schlüter (eds.), One language, two grammars? Differences between British and American English. Cambridge University Press, 1–12.
Rohdenburg, Günter and Julia Schlüter (eds.) 2009b. One language, two grammars? Differences between British and American English. Cambridge University Press.
Römer, Ute 2005. Progressives, patterns, pedagogy: a corpus-driven approach to English progressive forms, functions, contexts and didactics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Rudanko, Juhani 1998. Change and continuity in the English language: studies on complementation over the past three hundred years. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Rudanko, Juhani 1999. Diachronic studies of English complementation patterns. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Rudanko, Juhani 2000. Corpora and complementation. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Rudanko, Juhani 2002. Complements and constructions. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Rudanko, Juhani 2003. Comparing alternate complements of object control verbs: evidence from the Bank of English Corpus. In Pepi Leistyna and Charles F. Meyer (eds.), Corpus analysis: language structure and use. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 273–83.
Rudanko, Juhani 2005. Lexico-grammatical innovation in current British and American English: a case study on the transitive into -ing pattern with evidence from the Bank of English Corpus. Studia Neophilologica 77, 171–87.
Rudanko, Juhani 2006. Watching English grammar change: a case study on complement selection in British and American English. English Language and Linguistics 10, 31–48.
Rudanko, Juhani 2010. Explaining grammatical variation and change: a case study of complementation in American English over three decades. Journal of English Linguistics 38, 4–24.
Rudanko, Juhani and Lea Luodes 2005. Complementation in British and American English. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Rydén, Mats 1997. On the panchronic core meaning of the English progressive. In Terttu Nevalainen and Leena Kahlas-Tarkka (eds.), To explain the present. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique, 419–29.
Sadock, Jerrold M. 1984. The pragmatics of subordination. In W. de Geest and Y. Putseys (eds.), Sentential complementation. Dordrecht: Foris, 205–13.
Sakita, Tomoko I. 2002. Discourse perspectives on tense choice in spoken-English reporting discourse. In Tom Güldemann and Manfred von Roncador (eds.), Reported discourse: a meeting ground for different linguistic domains (Typological Studies in Language, vol. 52). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 173–98.
Sampson, Geoffrey 2002. Regional variation in the English verb qualifier system. English Language and Linguistics 6:1, 17–30.
Sankoff, David and Gillian Sankoff 1973. Sample survey methods and computer-assisted analysis in the study of grammatical variation. In R. Darnell (ed.), Canadian languages in their social context. Edmonton: Linguistic Research Inc., 7–63.
Šarčević, Susan 2000. New approach to legal translation. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
Scheffer, Johannes 1975. The progressive in English. Amsterdam and New York: North-Holland.
Schlüter, Norbert 2006. How reliable are the results? Comparing corpus-based studies of the present perfect. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 54:2, 135–48.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg 2000. English abstract nouns as conceptual shells: from corpus to cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Schneider, Stefan 2007. Reduced parenthetical clauses as mitigators: a corpus study of spoken French, Italian and Spanish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Schützler, Ole 2010.
Variable Scottish English consonants: the cases of /ʍ/ and non-prevocalic /r/.
Research in Language 8,
5–21. Available from
http://versita.com. DOI: 10.2478/v10015–010–0010–9.
Schützler, Ole 2011. Statistical approaches to hierarchical data in sociophonetics: the case of variable rhoticity in Scottish Standard English. In Chris Cummins, Chi-H é Elder, Thomas Godard, Morgan Macleod, Elaine Schmidt and George Walkden (eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Cambridge Postgraduate Conference in Language Research. Cambridge Institute of Language Research, 148–58.
Selkirk, Elizabeth O. 1981. The phrase phonology of English and French. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Selkirk, Elizabeth O. 1984. Phonology and syntax: the relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Seoane, Elena and Christopher Williams 2006. Changing the rules: a comparison of recent trends in English in academic scientific discourse and prescriptive legal discourse. In Marina Dossena and Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Diachronic perspectives on domain-specific English. Bern: Peter Lang, 255–76.
Sheskin, David J. 1997. Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures, 2nd edn. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Shitara, Yuko 1993. A survey of American pronunciation preferences – a preliminary report. Speech Hearing and Language 7, 201–32.
Siemund, Peter 2004. Substrate, superstrate and universal: perfect constructions in Irish English. In Bernd Kortmann (ed.), Dialectology meets typology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 401–34.
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie 2000. The functions of I think in political discourse. Journal of Applied Linguistics 10, 41–63.
Singler, John Victor 2001. Why you can't do a varbrul study of quotatives and what such a study can show us. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 7, 257–78.
Smith, K. Aaron 2007. The development of the English progressive. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 19:3, 2005–241.
Smith, Nicholas 2002. Ever moving on: changes in the progressive in recent British English. In Pam Peters, Peter Collins and Adam Smith (eds.), New frontiers of corpus research. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 317–30.
Smith, Nicholas 2003a. A quirky progressive? A corpus-based exploration of the will + be + -ing construction in recent and present day British English. In D. Archeret al. (eds.), Proceedings of Corpus Linguistics 2003(UCREL Technical Papers 16), 714–23.
Smith, Nicholas 2003b. Changes in the modals and semi-modals of strong obligation and epistemic necessity in recent British English. In Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug and Frank R. Palmer (eds.), Modality in contemporary English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 241–66.
Smith, Nicholas 2005. A corpus-based investigation of recent change in the use of the progressive in British English. Unpublished PhD thesis, Lancaster University.
Smith, Nicholas and Paul Rayson 2007. Recent change and variation in the British English use of the progressive passive. ICAME Journal 31, 129–59.
Smitterberg, Erik 2005. The progressive in 19th-century English: a process of integration. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.
Stassen, Leo 1997. Intransitive predication. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Stefanowitsch, Anatol 2007. Konstruktionsgrammatik und Korpuslinguistik. In Kerstin Fischer and Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik: von der Anwendung zur Theorie. Tübingen: Stauffenburg, 151–76.
Steger, Maria and Edgar W. Schneider 2009. Complexity as a function of iconicity: the case of complement clause constructions in New Englishes. Paper presented at the workshop on ‘Linguistic complexity in interlanguage varieties, L2 varieties, and contact languages’, FRIAS, Freiburg, 21–22 May 2009.
Stein, Dieter and Susan Wright (eds.) 1995. Subjectivity and subjectivisation: linguistic perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
Stenström, Anna-B rita 1995. Some remarks on comment clauses. In Bas Aarts and Charles F. Meyer (eds.), The verb in contemporary English. Cambridge University Press, 290–9.
Stenström, Anna-B rita 2000. It's enough funny, man: intensifiers in Teenage Talk. In John Kirk (ed.), Corpora galore: analyses and techniques in describing English: papers from the Nineteenth International Conference on English Language Research on Computerised Corpora (ICAME 1998). Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi, 177–90.
Stenström, Anna-Brita, Gisle Andersen and Ingrid Kristine Hasund 2002. Trends in teenage language: corpus compilation, analysis and findings. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Strang, Barbara. 1982. Some aspects of the history of the be+ing construction. In John Anderson (ed.), Language form and linguistic variation: papers dedicated to Angus Mcintosh. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 427–74.
Svartvik, Jan (ed.) 1990. The London–Lund Corpus of Spoken English: description and research (Lund Studies in English 82). Lund: C. W. K. Gleerup.
Swan, Michael 2005 [1980]. Practical English usage, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press.
Sweet, Henry 1900. A new English grammar logical and historical, part I: Introduction, phonology and accidence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt 2006. Morphosyntactic persistence in spoken English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Tabor, Whitney and Elizabeth Closs Traugott 1998. Structural scope expansion and grammaticalization. In Ramat Giacolone and Paul J. Hopper (eds.), The limits of grammaticalization. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 229–72.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2000. The grammaticalization of the present perfect in English: tracks of change and continuity in a linguistic enclave. In Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach and Dieter Stein (eds.), Pathways of change: grammaticalization in English (Studies in Language Companion Series 53). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 329–54.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2002. Comparative sociolinguistics. In J. K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill and Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds.), Handbook of language variation and change. Malden, MA, and Oxford: Blackwell, 729–63.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2003–6. Linguistic changes in Canada entering the 21st century. Research Grant. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC). #410–2003–0005.
http://individual.utoronto.ca/tagliamonte/.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2004a. Have to, gotta, must: grammaticalization, variation and specialization in English deontic modality. In Hans Lindquist and Christian Mair (eds.), Corpus research on grammaticalization in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 37–55.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2004b. It’s just like so cool! English in the 20th century. Paper presented at the International Association of University Professors of English (IAUPE). Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2005. So who? Like how? Just what? Discourse markers in the conversations of young Canadians. In Anna-Brita Stenström and Karin Aijmer (eds.), Approaches to spoken in teraction, special issue of Journal of Pragmatics 37:11, 1896–1915.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2006. ‘So cool, right?’: Canadian English entering the 21st century. In Peter Avery, Alexandra D'Arcy, Elaine Gold and Keren Rice (eds.), Canadian English in a global context, special issue of Canadian Journal of Linguistics 51:2–3, 309–31.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2008a. English has (got) it: grammaticalizing change in comparative perspective. Paper presented at ISLE (International Society for the Linguistics of English), Freiburg, Germany, 8–11 October 2008.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2008b. So different and pretty cool! Recycling intensifiers in Canadian English. In Belén Mendez-Naya et al. (eds.), Intensifiers, special issue of English Language and Linguistics 12:2, 361–94.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2009. Be like: the new quotative of English. In Nikolas Coupland and Adam Jaworski (eds.), The new sociolinguistics reader. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 75–91.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. and Alexandra D’Arcy 2004a. He's like; she's like: the quotative system in Canadian youth. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8:4, 493–514.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. and Alexandra D'Arcy 2004b. Mom said, and my daughter's like: tracking the quotative system through the generations. Paper presented at NWAV 33, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. and Alexandra D'Arcy 2005. When people say, ‘I was like’: the quotative system in Canadian youth. Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 10:2. Selected Papers from NWAVE 32. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. and Alexandra D'Arcy 2007a. Frequency and variation in the community grammar: tracking a new change through the generations. Language Variation and Change 19:2, 1–19.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. and Alexandra D'Arcy 2007b. The modals of obligation/necessity in Canadian perspective. English World-Wide 28:1, 47–87.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. and Alexandra D'Arcy 2009. Peaks beyond phonology: adolescence, incrementation, and language change. Language 85:1, 58–108.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. and Derek Denis 2008. The stuff of change: general extenders in North American English. American Dialect Society Annual Meeting. Chicago, Illinois, USA, 4 January 2008.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. and Rachel Hudson 1999. Be like et al. beyond America: the quotative system in British and Canadian youth. Journal of Sociolinguistics 3:2, 147–172.
Tagliamonte, Sali and Jennifer Smith 2002. ‘Either it isn't or it's not’ neg/aux contraction in British dialects. English World-Wide 23, 251–81.
Tagliamonte, Sali, and Jennifer Smith 2006. Layering, change and a twist of fate: deontic modality in dialects of English. Diachronica 23:2, 341–80.
Tagliamonte, Sali A., Alexandra J. D'Arcy and Bridget Jankowski 2010. Social work and linguistic systems: marking possession in Canadian English. Language Variation and Change 22:1, 1–25.
Taglicht, Josef 1970. The genesis of the conventional rules of ‘shall’ and ‘will’. English Studies 51:3, 193–213.
Thompson, Sandra A. 2002. ‘Object complements’ and conversation: towards a realistic account. Studies in Language 26, 125–64.
Thompson, Sandra A. and Anthony Mulac 1991. A quantitative perspective on the grammaticalization of epistemic parentheticals in English. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 313–39.
Tiersma, Peter M. 1999. Legal language. Chicago University Press.
Torres Cacoullos, Rena and James A. Walker 2009a. On the persistence of grammar in discourse formulas: a variationist study of that. Linguistics 47, 1–43.
Torres Cacoullos, Rena and James A. Walker 2009b. The present of the English future: grammatical variation and collocations in discourse. Language 85:2, 321–54.
Tottie, Gunnel 1991. Negation in English speech and writing. San Diego: Academic Press.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs 1982. From propositional to textual and expressive meanings: some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In Winfred P. Lehmann and Yakov Malkiel (eds.), Perspectives on historical linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 245–71.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs 1988. Pragmatic strengthening and grammaticalization. Berkeley Linguistics Society 14, 406–16.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs 1995b. Subjectification in grammaticalization. In Dieter Stein and Susan Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: linguistic perspectives. Cambridge University Press, 31–54.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs 1999. Why must is not moot. Paper presented at the Fourteenth International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Vancouver, British Columbia.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs 2000. Semantic change: an overview. In Lisa Cheng and Rint Sybesma (eds.), The first glot international state-of-the-article book: the latest in linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 385–406.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs 2007. The concepts of constructional mismatch and type-shifting from the perspective of grammaticalization. Cognitive Linguistics 18, 523–57.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs 2008. Grammaticalization, constructions and the incremental development of language: suggestions from the development of degree modifiers in English. In Regine Eckhardt, Gerhard Jäger and Tonjes Veenstra (eds.), Variation, selection, development: probing the evolutionary model of language change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 219–50.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Richard B. Dasher 2002. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge University Press.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Graeme Trousdale 2010a. Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization: how do they intersect? In Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Graeme Trousdale (eds.), Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 19–44.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Graeme Trousdale (eds.) 2010b. Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Trosborg, Anna 1995. Statutes and contracts: an analysis of legal speech acts in the English language of the law. Journal of Pragmatics 23, 31–53.
Trousdale, Graeme 2003a. Simplification and redistribution: an account of modal verb usage in Tyneside English. English World-Wide 24:2, 271–84.
Trousdale, Graeme 2003b. Modal verbs in Tyneside English. In Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug and Frank Palmer (eds.), Modality in contemporary English. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 381–2.
Trousdale, Graeme 2008a. Constructions in grammaticalization and lexicalization: evidence from the history of a composite predicate in English. In Graeme Trousdale and Nicholas Gisborne (eds.), Constructional approaches to English grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 33–67.
Trousdale, Graeme 2008b. Words and constructions in grammaticalization: the end of the English impersonal construction. In Donka Minkova and Susan Fitzmaurice (eds.), Studies in the history of the English language, vol. iv: Empirical and analytical advances in the study of English language change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 301–26.
Trousdale, Graeme and Nikolas Gisborne (eds.) 2008. Constructional approaches to English grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Trudgill, Peter (ed.) 1978. Sociolinguistic patterns in British English. London: Edward Arnold.
Trudgill, Peter 1984. Language in the British Isles. Cambridge University Press.
Trudgill, Peter and Jean Hannah 1994 [1982]. International English: a guide to varieties of standard English, 3rd edn. London: Arnold.
Urmson, James O. 1952. Parenthetical verbs. Mind 61, 480–96.
Van Bogaert, Julie 2006. I guess, I suppose and I believe as pragmatic markers: Grammaticalization and functions. Belgian Journal of English Language and Literatures (new series) 4, 129–49.
Van Bogaert, Julie 2009. The grammar of complement-taking mental predicate constructions in present-day spoken British English. PhD dissertation, University of Ghent.
Van Bogaert, Julie 2010a. ‘I'm guessing it looks probably like a sea monkey right now’: the recent emergence of comment clauses in the progressive. Paper presented at ICAME 31, 26–30 May 2010, Giessen.
Van Bogaert, Julie 2010b. A constructional taxonomy of I think and related expressions: accounting for the variability of complement-taking mental predicates. English Language and Linguistics 14:3, 399–427.
Van Herk, Gerard 2008. The present perfect in early African American correspondence. English World-Wide 29:1, 45–69.
Vázquez, Ignacio 2006. Nominalization in academic lectures: a corpus-based approach. In Carmen P érez Llantada and Gibson Ferguson (eds.), English as a glocalization phenomenon: observations from a linguistic microcosm. Valencia: Prensas Universitarias de Valencia, 131–152.
Verplaetse, Heidi 2003. What you and I want: a functional approach to verb complementation of modal want to. In Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug and Frank Palmer (eds.), Modality in contemporary English. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 151–89.
Visser, Fredericus Theodorus 1963–73. An historical syntax of the English language, 3 vols. Leiden: Brill.
Visser, Fredericus Theodorus 1972. An historical syntax of the English language vol. ii. Leiden: Brill.
Vosberg, Uwe 2003a. Cognitive complexity and the establishment of -ing constructions with retrospective verbs in Modern English. Linguistic Insights – Studies in Language and Communication 7, 197–220.
Vosberg, Uwe 2003b. The role of extractions and horror aequi in the evolution of -ing complements in Modern English. In Günther Rohdenburg and B. Mondorf (eds.), Determinants of grammatical variation in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 305–27.
Wagner, Susanne 2000. Depends how long you want for it to take: for/to clauses in present-day spoken British English. Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 25, 191–211.
Walker, Jim 2008. The footballer's perfect: are footballers leading the way? In Eva Lavric, Gerhard Pisek, Andrew Skinner and Wolfgang Stadler (eds.), The linguistics of football (Language in Performance 38). Tübingen: Narr, 295–303.
Wallis, Sean A. 2003. Completing parsed corpora: from correction to evolution. In Anne Abeillé (ed.), Treebanks: building and using Syntactically Annotated Corpora. Boston: Kluwer, 61–71.
Warner, Anthony R. 1993. English auxiliaries. Cambridge University Press.
Wells, John C. 2008 [2000, 1990]. Longman pronunciation dictionary. Harlow: Longman.
Wells, Rulon 1960. Nominal and verbal style. In Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 213–20.
Wichmann, Anne 2001. Spoken parentheticals. In Karin Aijmer (ed.), A wealth of English: studies in honour of Göran Kjellmer. Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgiensis, 177–93.
Wierzbicka, Anna 2006. English: meaning and culture. Oxford University Press.
Williams, Christopher 2002. Non-progressive and progressive aspect in English. Fasano: Schena Editore.
Williams, Christopher 2005. Tradition and change in legal English: verbal constructions in prescriptive texts. Bern: Peter Lang.
Williams, Christopher 2006. Fuzziness in legal English: what shall we do with ‘shall’? In Anne Wagner and Sophie Cacciaguidi (eds.), Legal language and the search for clarity. Bern: Peter Lang, 237–63.
Williams, Christopher 2007. Crossovers in legal cultures in Westminster and Edinburgh: some recent changes in the language of the law. ESP Across Cultures 4, 101–18.
Williams, Christopher 2009. Legal English and the ‘modal revolution’. In Pierre Busuttil, Raphael Salkie and Johan van der Auwera (eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Modality in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 199–210.
Williams, Christopher 2010. Functional or dysfunctional? The language of business contracts in English. Rassegna Italiana di Linguistica Applicata 3, 217–27.
Williams, Christopher and Denise Milizia 2008. How (un)readable is the European Constitution? A comparison of the English version and the Italian version. In A. Cannoneet al. (eds.), Studi in Onore di Vincenzo Storace. Naples: Editoriale Scientifica, 2209–227.
Wilson, Edwin B. 1927. Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association 22, 209–12.
Winter, Joanne 2002. Discourse quotatives in Australian English: adolescents performing voices. Australian Journal of Linguistics 22:1, 5–21.
Wright, Susan 1994. The mystery of the modal progressive. In Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), Studies in Early Modern English. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 467–85.
Wright, Susan 1995. Subjectivity and experiential syntax. In Dieter Stein and Susan Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation. Cambridge University Press, 151–72.
Wulff, Stefanie 2006, Go-V vs. go-and-V in English: a case of constructional synonymy? In Anatol Stefanowitsch and Stefan Th. Gries (eds.), Corpora in cognitive linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 101–25.
Wulff, Stefanie 2008. Das Prinzip der Nicht-Synonymität: V1-and-V2 und V1-V2 im Englischen. In Kerstin Fischer and Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik II: Von der Konstruktion zur Grammatik. Tübingen: Stauffenburg, 189–201.
Wulff, Stefanie, Anatol Stefanowitsch and Stefan Th. Gries 2007. Brutal Brits and persuasive Americans: variety specific meaning construction in the into-causative. In G. Raddenet al. (eds.) Aspects of Meaning Construction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 265–81.
Wydick, Richard C. 1979. Plain English for Lawyers. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
Yaeger-Dror, Malcah 1997. Contraction of negatives as evidence of variance in register-specific interactive rules. Language Variation and Change 9, 1–36.
Yaeger-Dror, Malcah, Lauren Hall-Lew and Sharon Deckert 2002. It's not or isn't it? Using large corpora to determine the influences on contraction strategies. Language Variation and Change 14, 79–118.
Yagoda, Ben 2006. You need to read this: how need
to vanquished have
to, must, and
should.
Slate, posted July 17, 2006.
www.slate.com Yao, Xinyue, and Peter Collins forthcoming. Recent change in non-present perfect constructions in British and American English. Corpora.
Yates, Norris 1981. The vocabulary of Time magazine revisited. American Speech 56:1, 53–63.
Zandvoort, Reinard W. 1945. A handbook of English grammar. Goningen.
Ziegeler, Deborah P. 2008. Grammaticalisation under control: towards a functional analysis of same-subject identity-sharing. Folia Linguistica 42:2, 401–51.
Zipf, George 1935. The psychobiology of language: an introduction to dynamic philology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
