Element contents
Generative AI for Second Language Writing Feedback, Assessment, and Instruction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 July 2026
Summary
Generative AI (GenAI) technology is transforming the landscape of language teaching and learning and has attracted considerable attention from researchers and educators in the field of second language (L2) education. Research has shown that, when used appropriately, GenAI can support students throughout the writing process, provide high-quality feedback on written work, and facilitate the assessment of L2 writing. This Element presents five innovative topics that the co-authors have explored: (1) student–GenAI interaction during the writing process; (2) collaborative processing of GenAI-generated feedback; (3) GenAI-supported teacher feedback; (4) the potential of GenAI for L2 writing assessment; and (5) teacher training in leveraging GenAI for L2 writing instruction. By synthesizing current research and practical applications, this Element aims to inspire researchers, practitioners, and graduate students to further investigate the role of GenAI in L2 writing contexts.
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781009657334Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 03 September 2026
References
Abrams, Z. (2023). Examining the role of peer collaborative feedback processing and task repetition in task-based L2 writing. In Li, M. & Zhang, M., eds., L2 collaborative writing in diverse learning contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 109–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aljasir, N. (2021). Matches or mismatches? Exploring shifts in individuals’ beliefs about written corrective feedback as students and teachers-to-be. Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education, 9(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.12785/jtte/090101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-khresheh, M. (2024). Bridging technology and pedagogy from a global lens: Teachers’ perspectives on integrating ChatGPT in English language teaching. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 1–12.Google Scholar
Allen, T., & Mizumoto, A. (2024, online first). ChatGPT over my friends: Japanese EFL learners’ preferences for editing and proofreading strategies. RELC Journal. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00336882241262533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almusharraf, N., & Alotaibi, H. (2023). An error-analysis study from an EFL writing context: Human and automated essay scoring approaches. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 28(1), 1015–1031. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-022-09592-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bai, L., & Hu, G. (2016). In the face of fallible AWE feedback: How do students respond? Educational Psychology, 37(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2016.1223275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, B. (2016). Language assessment literacy as professional competence: The case of Canadian admissions decision makers. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(1), 63–83. https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/CJAL/article/view/23033.Google Scholar
Barrios-Beltran, D. (2025). Exploring the efficacy of ChatGPT-4 feedback in second language Spanish writing. System, 133, 103771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrot, J. (2023). Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and potentials. Assessing Writing, 57, 100745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D. R. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing (1st ed.). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bitchener, J., & Storch, N. (2016). Written corrective feedback for L2 development. New York: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonilla, M., Van Steendam, E., Speelman, D., & Buyse, K. (2018). The differential effects of comprehensive feedback forms in the second language writing class: Comprehensive feedback in the L2 writing class. Language Learning, 68(3), 813–850. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brosa Rodríguez, A. (2025). Intelligent (but artificial) feedback in Spanish as a foreign language: Evaluation of ChatGPT and Claude as text correction tools. The EuroCALL Review, 32(2), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.4995/eurocall.2025.23827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucol, J. L., & Sangkawong, N. (2024). Exploring ChatGPT as a writing assessment tool. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 62(3), 868–882. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2024.2363901.Google Scholar
Bui, N., & Barrot, J. (2025). Using generative artificial intelligence as an automated essay scoring tool: A comparative study. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2025.2521003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldarini, G., Jaf, S., & McGarry, K. (2022). A literature survey of recent advances in chatbots. Information, 13(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13010041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, N., & Wicking, P. (2022). Learning outcomes generated through the collaborative processing of expert peer feedback. Journal of Language and Education, 8(4), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2022.13425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, T., & Thirakunkovit, S. (2019). A comparison of L1 and ESL written feedback preferences: Pedagogical applications and theoretical implications. Journal of Response to Writing, 5(2), 139–174. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/journalrw/vol5/iss2/7.Google Scholar
Chapelle, C. A., Cotos, E., & Lee, J. (2015). Validity arguments for diagnostic assessment using automated writing evaluation. Language Testing, 32(3), 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214565386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Z., Zhu, X., Lu, Q., & Wei, W. (2025). L2 students’ barriers in engaging with form and content-focused AI-generated feedback in revising their compositions. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2024.2422478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, D.LiM., & Lee, T. (2025). Leveraging ChatGPT for research writing: An exploration of ESL graduate students’ practices. Computers and Composition, 76, 102934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2025.102934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, X., & Zhang, L. J. (2024). Examining second language (L2) learners’ engagement with awe-teacher integrated feedback in a technology-empowered context. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 33(4), 1023–1035. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-024-00877-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, L., & Shi, H. (2025). Co-creating stories with generative AI: Reflections from undergraduate students of a storytelling service-learning subject in Hong Kong. Australia Review of Applied Linguistics, 47(4). https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.24101.che.Google Scholar
Choi, L. J., Kim, R., & Chung, S. J. (2025). Integrating chatbot technology in language teacher education: A TPACK-based analysis of pre-service teachers’ professional development. Language Learning & Technology, 29(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/73621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chuang, P.-L., & Yan, X. (2023). Connecting source use and argumentation in L2 integrated argumentative writing performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 60, 101003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosthwaite, P., & Sun, S. (2025, online first). Generative AI and L2 written feedback studies: A scoping review. RELC Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882251386530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cumming, A., Kantor, R., & Powers, D. E. (2002). Decision making while rating ESL/EFL writing tasks: A descriptive framework. The Modern Language Journal, 86(1), 67–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, R., & Viethen, J. (2021). The automated writing assistance landscape in 2021. Natural Language Engineering, 27(4), 511–518. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1351324921000164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darvin, R. (2025). The need for critical digital literacies in generative AI-mediated L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 67, 101186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ding, L., & Zou, D. (2024). Automated writing evaluation systems: A systematic review of grammarly, Pigai, and criterion with a perspective on future directions in the age of generative artificial intelligence. Education and Information Technologies, 29(1), 14151–14203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12402-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In Lantolf, J. P. & Appel, G., eds., Vygotskian approaches second language research. Norwood, NJNo: Ablex Publishing Corporation, pp. 33–56.Google Scholar
Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H. (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36(3), 353–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.02.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2010). Epilogue: A framework for investigating oral and written corrective feedback. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 335–349. www.jstor.org/stable/44488131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14, 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escalante, J., Pack, A., & Barrett, A. (2023). AI-generated feedback on writing: Insights into efficacy and ENL student preference. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(57). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00425-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, Y., Tang, L., Le, H., Shen, K., Tan, S., Zhao, Y., Shen, Y., Li, X., & Gašević, D. (2025). Beware of metacognitive laziness: Effects of generative artificial intelligence on learning motivation, processes, and performance. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(2), 489–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fathi, J., & Rahimi, M. (2024). Utilising artificial intelligence-enhanced writing mediation to develop academic writing skills in EFL learners: A qualitative study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2024.2374772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, D. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80110-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, D. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. In Hyland, K. & Hyland, F., Eds., Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 81–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, D. R., Liu, H., Sinha, A., & Senna, M. (2013). Written corrective feedback for individual L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3), 307–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geçkin, V., Kiziltas, E., & Cinar, C. (2023). Assessing second language academic writing: AI vs. human raters. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 6(4), 1096–1108. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1336599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghafouri, M, Hassaskhah, J., & Mahdavi-Zafarghandi, A. (2024, online first). From virtual assistant to writing mentor: Exploring the impact of a ChatGPT-based writing instruction protocol on EFL teachers’ self-efficacy and learners’ writing skill. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688241239764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gjorevski, A., Li, M., & Cox, T. L. (2025). Exploring the potential of ChatGPT for evaluating English essays in a criterion‐based assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 59(S1), S251–S279. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.70011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, K., & Wang, D. (2024). To resist it or to embrace it? Examining ChatGPT’s potential to support teacher feedback in EFL writing. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 8435–8463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12146-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guo, X. (2024). Facilitator or thinking inhibitor: Understanding the role of ChatGPT-generated written corrective feedback in language learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2445177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, J., & Li, M. (2024). Exploring ChatGPT-supported teacher feedback in the EFL context. System, 126, 103502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, J., & Li, M. (2026, online first). ChatGPT-supported teacher feedback on EFL students’ writing: Teachers’ perspectives. The Asia-Pacific Educational Researcher.Google Scholar
Handley, K., Price, M., & Millar, J. (2011). Beyond ‘doing time’: Investigating the concept of student engagement with feedback. Oxford Review of Education, 37(4), 543–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2011.604951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, W. C. H. (2023). The impact of ChatGPT on foreign language teaching and learning: Opportunities in education and research. Journal of Educational Technology and Innovation, 5(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.61414/jeti.v5i1.103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, X., Zou, D., Cheng, G., Chen, X., & Xie, H. (2023). Trends, research issues and applications of artificial intelligence in language education. Educational Technology & Society, 26(1), 112–131. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202301_26(1).0009.Google Scholar
Hussein, M. A., Hassan, H., & Nassef, M. (2019). Automated language essay scoring systems: A literature review. PeerJ Computer Science, 5, e208. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hyland, K. (2025, online first). EFL teachers and feedback fatigue: AI to the rescue? Language Teaching, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444825101018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444806003399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jauhiainen, J. S., & Garagorry Guerra, A. (2025). Generative AI in education: ChatGPT-4 in evaluating students’ written responses. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 62(4), 1377–1394. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2024.2422337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, L., & Lai, C. (2025). How did the generative artificial intelligence-assisted digital multimodal composing process facilitate the production of quality digital multimodal compositions: Toward a process-genre integrated model. TESOL Quarterly, 59(S1), S52–S85. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, L., & Li, M. (forthcoming). Digital multimodal composing and TESOL in the GenAI era. Special issue of TESOL Quarterly.Google Scholar
Jiang, X., Li, J., & Chen, C. H. (2024). Enhancing critical thinking skills with ChatGPT-powered activities in Chinese language classrooms. International Journal of Chinese Language Teaching, 5(1), 47–73. https://doi.org/10.46451/ijclt.20240105.Google Scholar
Jiang, Y., Hao, J., Fauss, M., & Li, C. (2024). Detecting ChatGPT-generated essays in a large-scale writing assessment: Is there a bias against non-native English speakers? Computers & Education, 217, 105070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., et alet ee. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, M., Rostrán Valle, J. M., Çekmegeli, K., & Farrell, S. (2025). Generative AI for learning languages other than English: L2 writers’ current uses and perceptions of ethics. Foreign Language Annals, 58(3), 508–531. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.70005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. RELC Journal, 54(2), 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohnke, L., & Zou, D. (2024). Exploring the Nexus of Generative AI and Language Education: Opportunities, Challenges, and Innovations. Special issue of Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. www.sciencedirect.com/special-issue/105NQ1KHM37.Google Scholar
Kohnke, L., & Zou, D. (2025). The role of ChatGPT in enhancing English teaching: A paradigm shift in lesson planning and instructional practices. Educational Technology & Society, 28(3), 4–20. www.jstor.org/stable/48827947.Google Scholar
Koltovskaia, S., Rahmati, P., & Saeli, H. (2024). Graduate students’ use of ChatGPT for academic text revision: Behavioral, cognitive, and affective engagement. Journal of Second Language Writing, 65, 101130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S. S., & Moore, R. L. (2024). Harnessing generative AI (GenAI) for automated feedback in higher education: A systematic review. Online Learning, 28(3), 82–106. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i3.4593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, B., Lowell, V. L., Wang, C., Li, X. (2024). A systematic review of the first year of publications on ChatGPT and language education: Examining research on ChatGPT’s use in language learning and teaching. Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J., Huang, J., Wu, W., & Whipple, P. B. (2024). Evaluating the role of ChatGPT in enhancing EFL writing assessments in classroom settings: A preliminary investigation. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1268. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03755-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J., Link, S., & Hegelheimer, V. (2015). Rethinking the role of automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback in ESL writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 27, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.10.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, M. (2024). Leveraging ChatGPT for second language writing feedback and assessment. Journal of Computer Assisted Language Learning & Teaching, 14(1), 1–11.Google Scholar
Li, M., Belpoliti, F., Zhang, M., & Taha, G. (2026, online first). World language teachers’ reported practices of integrating ChatGPT into instruction: A positioning analysis. Foreign Language Annals.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, M., Gibbons, J., & Pham, Q. N. (2023). Examining visual metadiscourse in EFL students’ infographics. CALICO Journal, 40(3), 289–312. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.24502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, M., & Kim, D. (2016). One wiki, two groups: Dynamic interactions across ESL collaborative writing tasks. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31, 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, M., & Pham, Q. N. (2022). Three heads are better than one? Digital multimodal composition completed collaboratively versus individually. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221102536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, M., & Zhu, W. (2017). Explaining dynamic interactions in wiki-based collaborative writing. Language Learning & Technology, 21(2), 96–120. http://llt.msu.edu/issues/june2017/lizhu.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, S. (2025). Generative AI and second language writing. Digital Studies in Language and Literature, 1(2), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1515/dsll-2025-0007.Google Scholar
Li, X., Li, B., & Cho, S. (2023). Empowering Chinese language learners from low-income families to improve their Chinese writing with ChatGPT’s assistance afterschool. Languages, 8(4), 238. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8040238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, X., Wang, W., & Gu, L. (2025). An empirical study of Chinese EFL student writers’ use of GenAI feedback during revision: Perceptions, engagement, and motivational impact. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. https://tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02602938.2025.2587925.Google Scholar
Lin, S., & Crosthwaite, P. (2024). The grass is not always greener: Teacher vs. GPT- assisted written corrective feedback. System, 127, 103529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linacre, J. M. (2024). Facets computer program for many-facet Rasch measurement. Beaverton, OR: Winsteps.comGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y., Park, J., & McMinn, S. (2024). Using generative artificial intelligence/ChatGPT for academic communication: Students’ perspectives. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 34(4), 1437–1461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y., Qi, H., & Lu, X. (2025). Enhancing GPT-based automated essay scoring: The impact of fine-tuning and linguistic complexity measures. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2025.2518430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, Q., Yao, Y., Xiao, L., Yuan, M., Wang, J., & Zhu, X. (2024). Can ChatGPT effectively complement teacher assessment of undergraduate students’ academic writing? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(5), 616–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2301722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, Q., Yao, Y., Xiao, L., Zhu, X., & Yin, H. (2026). Exploring the impact of a GenAI-supported feedback practice on student feedback literacy in L2 writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2025.2605541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, Y., Liles, X., & Ma, X. (2025). GenAI and human assessments of L2 Chinese writing: Interrater reliability and rater bias. Assessing Writing, 66, 100989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2025.100989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luke, A., & Freebody, P. (1999). A map of possible practices: Further notes on the four resources model. Practically Primary, 4(2), 5–8. www.readingonline.org/research/lukefreebody.htm.Google Scholar
Lumley, T. (2002). Assessment criteria in a large-scale writing test: What do they really mean to the raters? Language Testing, 19(3), 246–276. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532202lt230oa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, X. (2023). Using teacher-supported peer feedback to develop student feedback literacy in L2 writing: An instructional perspective. Feedback Research Studies in Language, 1(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.32038/frsl.2023.01.05.Google Scholar
MacCallum, K., Parsons, D., & Mohaghegh, M. (2024). The Scaffolded AI Literacy (SAIL) Framework for Education: Preparing learners at all levels to engage constructively with artificial intelligence. He Rourou, 1(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.54474/herourou.v1i1.10835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahapatra, S. (2024). Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students’ academic writing skills: A mixed methods intervention study. Smart Learning Environments, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00295-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marinho, P., Fernandes, P., & Pimentel, F. (2021). The digital portfolio as an assessment strategy for learning in higher education. Distance Education, 42(2), 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2021.1911628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mizumoto, A., & Eguchi, M. (2023). Exploring the potential of using an AI language model for automated essay scoring. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 2, 100050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mizumoto, A., Shintani, N., Sasaki, M., & Teng, M. F. (2024). Testing the viability of ChatGPT as a companion in L2 writing accuracy assessment. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 3, 100116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2024.100116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mollick, E., & Mollick, L. (2023). Assigning AI: Seven approaches for students, with prompts. arXiv.Org. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2306.10052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorhouse, B. L., & Kohnke, L. (2024). The effects of generative AI on initial language teacher education: The perceptions of teacher educators. System, 122,103290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorhouse, B. L., Wan, Y., Wu, C., Kohnke, L., Ho, T. Y., & Kwong, T. (2024). Developing language teachers’ professional generative AI competence: An intervention study in an initial language teacher education course. System, 125, 103399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorhouse, B. L., & Wong, K. L. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence and language teaching. Cambridge Elements in Generative AI in Education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mujtaba, S. M., Reynolds, B. L., Parkash, R., & Singh, M. K. M. (2021). Individual and collaborative processing of written corrective feedback affects second language writing accuracy and revision. Assessing Writing, 50, 100566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naismith, B., Mulcaire, P., & Burstein, J. (2023). Automated evaluation of written discourse coherence using GPT-4. In Kochmar, E., Burstein, J., Horback, A., Laarman-Quante, R., Madnani, N., Tack, A., Yaneva, V., Yuan, Z., & Zesch, T., eds., Proceedings of the 18th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 394–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obaidoon, S., & Wei, H. (2024). ChatGPT, Bard, Bing Chat, and Claude generate feedback for Chinese as foreign language writing: A comparative case study. Future in Educational Research, 2(3), 184-204. https://doi.org/10.1002/fer3.39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ou, A., Khuder, B., Franzetti, S., & Negretti, R. (2024). Conceptualizing and cultivating critical GAI literacy in doctoral academic writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 66, 101156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özdemir-Çağatay, S. (2023). Examining the use of ChatGPT in language teaching: Teachers’ experiences and perceptions. In Kartal, G., ed., Transforming the language teaching experience in the Age of AI. New York: IGI Global, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Pack, A., Barrett, A., & Escalante, J. (2024). Large language models and automated essay scoring of English language learner writing: Insights into validity and reliability. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100234.Google Scholar
Peng, C. X., Storch, N., & Knoch, U. (2023). Greater coverage vs. deeper processing? Comparing individual and collaborative processing of teacher feedback. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688231214910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfau, A., Polio, C., & Xu, Y. (2023). Exploring the potential of ChatGPT in assessing L2 writing accuracy for research purposes. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 2(3), 100083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2024). Sociocultural theory and second language developmental education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009189422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramesh, D., & Sanampudi, S. K. (2022). An automated essay scoring system: A systematic literature review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 55(3), 2495–2527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-021-10068-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ranalli, J. (2018). Automated written corrective feedback: How well can students make use of it? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(7), 653–674. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1428994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranalli, J. (2021). L2 student engagement with automated feedback on writing: Potential for learning and issues of trust. Journal of Second Language Writing, 52, 100816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, J. (2025). How to use generative AI in educational research. Elements in Research Methods in Education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers, 4th ed. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In Robinson, P., ed., Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524780.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, Y., & Chen, L. (2025). “Critical chatting” or “casual cheating”: How graduate EFL students utilize ChatGPT for academic writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2025.2479141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shermis, M. D., Mzumara, H. R., Olson, J., & Harrington, S. (2001). On-line grading of student essays: PEG goes on the World Wide Web. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(3), 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930120052404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shi, H., Chai, C. S., Zhou, S., & Aubrey, S. (2025). Comparing the effects of ChatGPT and automated writing evaluation on students’ writing and ideal L2 writing self. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2025.2454541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, D., & Lee, J. H. (2024a). Exploratory study on the potential of ChatGPT as a rater of second language writing. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 24735–24757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12817-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, D., & Lee, J. H. (2024b). Moving from off-the-shelf chatbots to a user-designed bespoke L2 chatbot. Language Learning & Technology, 28(1), 1–14. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/73581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. ETS Research Report Series, 2007(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.2007.tb02053.x.Google Scholar
Song, D., & Tang, A. F. (2025). Exploring AI-assistance in L2 Chinese writing with standardized assessment tasks. Language Learning & Technology, 29(2), 161–189. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/73615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiss, J., Tate, T., Graham, S., Cruz, J., Hebert, M., Wang, J., Moon, Y., Tseng, W., Warschauer, M., & Olson, C. B. (2024). Comparing the quality of human and ChatGPT feedback of students’ writing. Learning and Instruction, 91, 101894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52, 119–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storch, N. (2013). Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. Bristol, Blue Ridge Summit: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storch, N. (2021). Theoretical perspectives on L2 writing and language learning in collaborative writing and the collaborative processing of written corrective feedback. In Manchon, R. & Polio, C., eds., The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and writing. New York: Routledge, pp. 22–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storch, N., & Alshuraidah, A. (2020). Languaging when providing and processing peer feedback. In Suzuki, W. & Storch, N., eds., Languaging in language learning and teaching: A collection of empirical studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing Company, pp. 111–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strobl, C., Menke-Bazhutkina, I., Abel, N., & Michel, M. (2024). Adopting ChatGPT as a writing buddy in the advanced L2 writing class. Technology in Language Teaching and Learning, 6(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.29140/tltl.v6n1.1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Su, Y., Lin, Y., & Lai, C. (2023). Collaborating with ChatGPT in argumentative writing classrooms. Assessing Writing, 57, 100752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M. (2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language learning. In Byrnes, H., ed., Advanced language learning: The contributions of Halliday and Vygotsky. London: Continuum, pp. 95–108.Google Scholar
Swain, M. (2010). Talking-it-through: Languaging as a source of learning. In Batestone, R., ed., Sociocognitive perspectives on language use and language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 112–130.Google Scholar
Taha, G. (2026, forthcoming). Collaborative processing of ChatGPT feedback in collaborative writing tasks: A case study of first-year writing. Unpublished PhD dissertation. East Texas A&M University–Commerce.Google Scholar
Tan, X. (2025). Academic socialization with generative AI: A longitudinal case study of an L2 graduate student’s academic literacies development. Journal of Second Language Writing, 70, 101263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teng, M. F. (2024a). “ChatGPT is the companion, not enemies”: EFL learners’ perceptions and experiences in using ChatGPT for feedback in writing. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100270.Google Scholar
Teng, M. F. (2024b). A systematic review of ChatGPT for English as a foreign language writing: Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 6(3), 36–57. https://doi.org/10.58304/ijts.20240304.Google Scholar
Tian, Z., & Wang, C. (2025). Rethinking language education in the age of generative AI. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, C. (2024). Exploring students’ generative AI-assisted writing processes: Perceptions and experiences from native and nonnative English speakers. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09744-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, C., & Tian, Z. (2025). Rethinking writing education in the age of generative AI. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, C., Tian, Z., & Christiansen, M.S. (2025). Generative Artificial Intelligence in Second Language Writing. Special issue of Journal of Second Language Writing.Google Scholar
Wang, C., & Wang, Z. (2025). Investigating L2 writers’ critical AI literacy in AI-assisted writing: An APSE model. Journal of Second Language Writing, 67, 101187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Q., & Gayed, J. M. (2024). Effectiveness of large language models in automated evaluation of argumentative essays: Finetuning vs. zero-shot prompting. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2024.2371395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y. (2024). Reviewing the usage of ChatGPT on L2 students’ English academic writing learning. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 30, 173–178. https://doi.org/10.54097/dvjkj706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warschauer, M., & Ware, P. (2006). Automated writing evaluation: Defining the classroom research agenda. Language Teaching Research, 10(2), 157–180. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168806lr190oa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warschauer, M., Tseng, W., Yim, S., Webster, T., Jacob, S., Du, Q., & Tate, T. (2023). The affordances and contradictions of AI-generated text for writers of English as a second or foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 62, 101071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Ichter, B., Xia, F., Chi, E., Le, Q., & Zhou, D. (2022). Chain-of-Thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2201.11903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weigle, S. C. (1999). Investigating rater/prompt interactions in writing assessment: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Assessing Writing, 6(2), 145–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1075-2935(00)00010-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiboolyasarin, W., Wiboolyasarin, K., Suwanwihok, K., Jinowat, N., & Muenjanchoey, R. (2024). Synergizing collaborative writing and AI feedback: An investigation into enhancing L2 writing proficiency in wiki-based environments. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100228.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2012). Feedback and writing development through collaboration: A socio-cultural approach. In Manchón, R., ed., L2 Writing Development: Multiple Perspectives. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 69–100. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781934078303.69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williyan, A. Fitriati, S. W., Pratama, H., & Sakhiyya, Z. (2024). AI as co-creator: Exploring Indonesian EFL teachers’ collaboration with AI in content development. Teaching English with Technology, 24(2). 5–21. https://doi.org/10.56297/vaca6841/LRDX3699/RZOH5366.Google Scholar
Wilson, J., & Czik, A. (2016). Automated essay evaluation software in English Language Arts classrooms: Effects on teacher feedback, student motivation, and writing quality. Computers & Education, 100, 94–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Withey, C. (2013). Feedback engagement: Forcing feed-forward amongst law students. The Law Teacher, 47(3), 319–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2013.851336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woo, D. J., Guo, K., & Susanto, H. (2025). Exploring EFL students’ prompt engineering in human–AI story writing: An activity theory perspective. Interactive Learning Environments, 33(1), 863–882. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2361381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woo, D. J., Wang, D., Guo, K., & Susanto, H. (2024). Teaching EFL students to write with ChatGPT: Students’ motivation to learn, cognitive load, and satisfaction with the learning process. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 24963–24990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12819-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, H., Wang, Y., & Lalli, G. S. (2025, online first). Scale validation and latent profile identification of GenAI competence for pre-service second language teachers. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2024-0301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, Y., & Zhi, Y. (2023). An exploratory study of EFL learners’ use of ChatGPT for language learning tasks: Experience and perceptions. Languages, 8, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8030212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, W., & Tan, X. (2025). Blessing or cursing: Second language writing teachers’ perceptions of using ChatGPT in classrooms. In Wang, C. & Tian, Z., eds., Rethinking writing education in the age of Generative AI. New York: Routledge, pp. 71–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, D. (2023). Impact of ChatGPT on learners in a L2 writing practicum: An exploratory investigation. Education and Information Technologies, 28(11), 13943–13967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11742-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, D., & Zhang, S. (2024). L2 writer engagement with automated written corrective feedback provided by ChatGPT: A mixed-method multiple case study. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03543-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, C. T. Y., & Chen, H. H. J. (2025). ChatGPT and L2 Chinese writing: Evaluating the impact of model version and prompt language on automated corrective feedback. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2025.2453205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(3), 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yao, D. (2021). Automated writing evaluation for ESL learners: A case study of Pigai system. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 18(3), 949–958. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2021.18.3.14.949.Google Scholar
Yavuz, F., Çelik, Ö., & Yavaş Çelik, G. (2024). Utilizing large language models for EFL essay grading: An examination of reliability and validity in rubric‐based assessments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(1), 150–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeung, S. (2025). University students’ engagement with generative AI-supported automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 68, 101203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zare, J., Al-Issa, A., & Ranjbaran Madiseh, F. (2025). Interacting with ChatGPT in essay writing: A study of L2 learners’ task motivation. ReCALL, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344025000035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y., Lai, C., & Gu, M. M. Y. (2025). Becoming a teacher in the era of AI: A multiple-case study of pre-service teachers’ investment in AI-facilitated learning-to-teach practices. System, 133, 103746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z., & Hyland, K. (2018). Student engagement with teachers and automated feedback on L2 writing. Assessing Writing, 36, 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.02.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z., & Hyland, K. (2022). Fostering student engagement with feedback: An integrated approach. Assessing Writing, 51, 100586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zou, M., Kong, D., & Lee, I. (2025). Doctoral student’s strategy use in GAI chatbot-assisted L2 writing: An activity theory perspective. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 76, 101521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zou, S., Guo, K.KK, Wang, J.JJ, & Liu, Y. (2025). Investigating students’ uptake of teacher- and ChatGPT-generated feedback in EFL writing: A comparison study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2024.2447279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.1 AA
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The HTML of this Element
complies with version 2.1 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), covering newer accessibility requirements and improved
user experiences and achieves the intermediate
(AA)
level of WCAG compliance, covering a wider range of accessibility requirements.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Structural and Technical Features
ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
Jining Han‘s affiliation is now City University of Macau