Element contents
Intercultural Communication and Cancer
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 July 2026
Summary
Cancer is increasingly recognized as a complex, multidimensional social experience rather than purely a physical or biological disease. This, in turn, highlights the role of communication in cancer-related 'work' such as seeking and receiving a diagnosis, managing disclosure, and incorporating treatment and recovery into everyday life. Although an extensive body of work examining cancer and communication has investigated some of this complexity, the experiences of migrant women in Asia are currently underexplored. In this Element, I argue that the complexity of cancer diagnosis and disclosure for this group can be usefully examined from a perspective of intercultural communication. To support this argument, I investigate instances of intercultural communication that unfolded in a series of focus groups with Filipino migrant domestic workers diagnosed with cancer in Hong Kong.
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781009656368Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 20 August 2026
References
Abimbola, S. (2021). The uses of knowledge in global health. BMJ Global Health, 6(4), e005802. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005802.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abubakar, I., Aldridge, R. W., Devakumar, D. et al. (2018). The UCL–Lancet commission on migration and health: The health of a world on the move. The Lancet, 392(10164), 2606–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32114-7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adamson, F. B., & Tsourapas, G. (2020). The migration state in the global south: Nationalizing, developmental, and neoliberal models of migration management. The International Migration Review, 54(3), 853–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0197918319879057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amadasi, S., & Holliday, A. (2018). ‘I already have a culture’. Negotiating competing grand and personal narratives in interview conversations with new study abroad arrivals. Language and Intercultural Communication, 18(2), 241–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2017.1357727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amrith, M. (2021). Ageing bodies, precarious futures: The (im)mobilities of ‘temporary’ migrant domestic workers over time. Mobilities, 16(2), 249–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2021.1885834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach‐Mortensen, A. M., & Verboom, B. (2020). Barriers and facilitators systematic reviews in health: A methodological review and recommendations for reviewers. Research Synthesis Methods, 11(6), 743–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, B. R. (2017). Mobilities in/and nomadic health research: Health communication scholarship and flows across migratory landscapes. In Mao, Y. & Ahmed, R., (eds.), Culture, Migration, and Health Communication in a Global Context (pp. 235–53). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Batouli, A., Jahanshahi, P., Gross, C. P., Makarov, D. V. & Yu, J. B. (2014). The global cancer divide: Relationships between national healthcare resources and cancer outcomes in high-income vs. middle- and low-income countries. Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health, 4(2), 115–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jegh.2013.10.004.Google ScholarPubMed
Beck, S. (2012). Biomedical mobilities: Transnational lab-benches and other space-effects. In Knecht, M., Klotz, M., & Beck, S., (eds.), Reproductive Technologies as Global Form. Ethnographies of Knowledge, Practices, and Transnational Encounters (pp. 357–74). Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
Bernadas, J. M. A. C., & Jiang, L. C. (2016). ‘Of and beyond medical consequences’: Exploring health information scanning and seeking behaviors of Filipino domestic service workers in Hong Kong. Health Care for Women International, 37(8), 855–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2015.1107071.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Betancourt, J. R. (2006). Cultural competence and medical education: Many names, many perspectives, one goal. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 81(6), 499–501. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ACM.0000225211.77088.cb.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blix, B. H. (2015). ‘Something decent to wear’: Performances of being an insider and an outsider in indigenous research. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(2), 175–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414542702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, M. (2019). Filipina domestic workers in Hong Kong: Between permanence and temporariness in everyday life. Current Sociology, 67(2), 273–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392118792928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradby, H., Green, G., Davison, C., & Krause, K. (2017). Is superdiversity a useful concept in European medical sociology? Frontiers in Sociology, 1, 17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2016.00017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broom, A., Kenny, K., Kirby, E., & Lwin, Z. (2019). The collective/affective practice of cancer survivorship. The British Journal of Sociology, 70(4), 1582–601. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12616.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broom, A., Parker, R., Raymond, S. et al. (2020). The (co) production of difference in the care of patients with cancer from migrant backgrounds. Qualitative Health Research, 30(11), 1619–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320930699.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, C., Scott, K., Skovdal, M. et al. (2015). A good patient? How notions of ‘a good patient’ affect patient-nurse relationships and ART adherence in Zimbabwe. BMC Infectious Diseases, 15(1), 404. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-1139-x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheung, J. T. K., Tsoi, V. W. Y., Wong, K. H. K., & Chung, R. Y. (2019). Abuse and depression among Filipino foreign domestic helpers. A cross-sectional survey in Hong Kong. Public Health, 166, 121–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2018.09.020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chiswick, B. R., & Miller, P. W. (2007). The Economics of Language: International Analyses. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203963159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christie-de Jong, F., & Reilly, S. (2020). Barriers and facilitators to pap-testing among female overseas Filipino workers: A qualitative exploration. International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare, 13(3), 275–88. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHRH-01-2020- 0006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, M. & McKeever, B. W. (2020). Culture and health communication: A comparative content analysis of Tweets from the United States and Korea. International Journal of Communication, 14(0), 4035–4054.Google Scholar
Chung, G. K. K., Robinson, M., Marmot, M., & Woo, J. (2023). Monitoring socioeconomic inequalities in health in Hong Kong: insights and lessons from the UK and Australia. The Lancet Regional Health–Western Pacific, 31, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claeys, A., Berdai‐Chaouni, S., Tricas‐Sauras, S., & De Donder, L. (2023). Barriers and facilitators in providing care for patients with a migration background. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 32(5–6), 912–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.16491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cole, K. L., Hernández, L. H., & Upton, S. D. (2023). Returning to (neo) normal: A case study in critical intercultural health communication. In Nakayama, T. K. & Halualani, R. T., (eds.), The Handbook of Critical Intercultural Communication (2nd ed., pp. 553–68). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119745426.Google Scholar
Conti, B., Bochaton, A., Charreire, H. et al. (2022). Influence of geographic access and socioeconomic characteristics on breast cancer outcomes: A systematic review. PloS One, 17(7), e0271319. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, C., Brunton, M., Pukepuke, T., & Tan, A. L. (2018). Exploring communication during the journey from noticing bodily changes to a diagnosis of endometrial cancer. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(5–6), 1262–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cordella, M., & Poiani, A. (2014). Behavioural Oncology: Psychological, Communicative, and Social Dimensions. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, R. T., & Xiong, B. (2022). Traditions of communication theory and the potential for multicultural dialogue. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 17(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2021.2009487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curran, N. M., & Ladegaard, H. J. (2025). Interculturality, linguistic diversity, and social inclusion: Current issues and future challenges. Language and Intercultural Communication, 25(3), 309–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2025.2527991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dai, X. D. & Martin, J. N. (2022). Perspectives and approaches to intercultural communication competence: Toward a theoretical synthesis. In Miike, Y. and Yin, J. (eds.), Handbook of Global Interventions in Communication Theory (pp. 456–73). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dasli, M., & Diaz, A. R. (eds.). (2017). The Critical Turn in Language and Intercultural Communication Pedagogy: Theory, Research and Practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dee, E. C., Ang, C. D. U., Ting, F. I. L., Tangco, E. D., & Eala, M. A. B. (2022). Improving cancer care in the Philippines: The need for deliberate and careful implementation of the National Integrated Cancer Control Act. The Lancet Regional Health. Western Pacific, 28, 100615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100615.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeParle, J. (2019 ). A Good Provider is One Who Leaves: One Family and Migration in the 21st Century. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
de Ruiter, M. C., van Klaveren, L. M. & Geukers, V. G. M. (2024). The significance of a dialectical approach to enrich health professions education. BMC Medical Education, 24, 1095. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06108-4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dirlik, A. (2016). Global Modernity: Modernity in the Age of Global Capitalism. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dirlik, A. (2015). Our Ways of Knowing—and What to Do About Them. In& Dirlik, A. (Ed). Pedagogies of the Global& (pp. 3–17). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donovan-Kicken, E., Tollison, A. C., & Goins, E. S. (2012). The nature of communication work during cancer: Advancing the theory of illness trajectories. Health Communication, 27(7), 641–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.629405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dutta, M. (2020). Communication, Culture and Social Change. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutta, M. J. (2022). Culture-centered approach to communicating health and development: Communication, social justice, and social change. In Miike, Y. and Yin, J. (eds.), Handbook of Global Interventions in Communication Theory (pp. 440–455). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dutta, M. J. (2024). Decolonizing the pedagogy of health communication campaigns: A culture-centered approach. Communication Education, 73(4), 405–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2024.2403449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eala, M. A. B., Maslog, E. A. S., Dee, E. C. et al. (2022). Geographic distribution of cancer care providers in the Philippines. JCO Global Oncology, 8, e2200138. https://doi.org/10.1200/GO.22.00138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekmekci, P. E., & Arda, B. (2017). Interculturalism and informed consent: Respecting cultural differences without breaching human rights. Cultura, 14(2), 159–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Essue, B. M., Iragorri, N., Fitzgerald, N., & de Oliveira, C. (2020). The psychosocial cost burden of cancer: A systematic literature review. Psycho‐Oncology, 29(11), 1746–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernandez, R. A. T., & Ting, F. I. L. (2023). Achieving health equity in cancer care in the Philippines. Ecancer, 17, 1547. https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2023.1547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferri, G. (2020). Difference, becoming and rhizomatic subjectivities beyond ‘otherness’: A posthuman framework for intercultural communication. Language and Intercultural Communication, 20(5), 408–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2020.1774598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fong, E., Shibuya, K., Massey, D., & Cook, K. (2020). Migration patterns in East and Southeast Asia: Causes and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology, 46, 511–31. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garabiles, M. R., Ofreneo, M. A. P., & Hall, B. J. (2017). Towards a model of resilience for transnational families of Filipina domestic workers. PloS One, 12(8), e0183703. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, A. F., Lee, C., & Crabb, S. (2014). ‘If you grow them, know them’: Discursive constructions of the pink ribbon culture of breast cancer in the Australian context. Feminism & Psychology, 24(4), 521–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353514548100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halualani, R. T., & Nakayama, T. K. (2010). Critical intercultural communication studies at a crossroads. In Nakayama, T. K. & Halualani, R. T. (Eds.), The handbook of critical intercultural communication (pp. 1–16). Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Handtke, O., Schilgen, B., & Mösko, M. (2019). Culturally competent healthcare – A scoping review of strategies implemented in healthcare organizations and a model of culturally competent healthcare provision. PloS One, 14(7), e0219971. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey-Sullivan, A., Ali, S., Dhesi, P. et al. (2025). Comparing cancer stage at diagnosis between migrants and non-migrants: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Cancer, 132, 158–67. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-024-02896-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hassan, I., Christy, A., & Bui, T. (2024). Structural and social determinants of health. In Lu, L. B., Fortuna, R. J., Noronha, C. F., Sobel, H. G. & Tobin, D. G. (eds.), Leading an Academic Medical Practice (pp. 343-355). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Heath, M., Hvass, A. M. F. & Wejse, C. M. (2023). Interpreter services and effect on healthcare – A systematic review of the impact of different types of interpreters on patient outcome. Journal of Migration and Health, 7, 100162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmh.2023.100162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heinrich, L. (2025). From promise to pitfall: Rethinking the role of postcolonial theory in intercultural communication – Insights from decolonizing global health discourse. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 54(5), 351–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2025.2543533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hieke, G., Black, G. B., Yargawa, J. et al. (2025). South Asian patient experiences of professional interpreting service provision in general practice in England: A qualitative interview study. International Journal for Equity in Health, 24, 104. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02477-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliday, A., & Amadasi, S. (2019). Making Sense of the Intercultural: Finding DeCentred Threads. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351059190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliday, A., & Macdonald, M. N. (2020). Researching the intercultural: Intersubjectivity and the problem with postpositivism. Applied Linguistics, 41(5), 621–39. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amz006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, C. (2014). No one sees the fear: Becoming diseased before becoming ill – Being diagnosed with breast cancer. Cancer Nursing, 37(3), 175–83. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0b013e318281395e.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hong Kong Immigration Department. (2023). Meanings of right of abode and other terms. www.immd.gov.hk/eng/services/roa/term.html.Google Scholar
Horton, R. (2023). Offline: Health’s intercultural turn. The Lancet, 401(10370), 12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsieh, E. (2016). Bilingual Health Communication: Working with Interpreters in Cross- Cultural Care. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, E. (2021). Intercultural health communication: Rethinking culture in health communication. In Thompson, T. L. & Golson, J. G. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Health Communication (3rd ed., pp. 441–55). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003043379-37.Google Scholar
Huang, W.-J., Li, M., He, J., & Chan, W. K. (2024). Conflicts and interactions in urban tourism: Use of urban public space by residents, tourists, and migrant domestic workers in Hong Kong. Tourism Management, 105, 104960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2024.104960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Labour Office (ILO). (2024). ILO global estimates on international migrant workers: International migrants in the labour force (4th edn). Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
Ishikawa, H., & Yamazaki, Y. (2005). How applicable are Western models of patient‐physician relationship in Asia? Changing patient‐physician relationship in contemporary Japan. International Journal of Japanese Sociology, 14(1), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6781.2005.00070.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Organization for Migration (IOM). (2019). World Migration Report 2020. https://publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/wmr_2020.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Islam, M. R., & Cojocaru, S. (2016). Migrant domestic workers in Asia: Transnational variations and policy concerns. International Migration, 54(1), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karimzad, F., & Catedral, L. (2021). Chronotopes and Migration: Language, Social Imagination, and Behavior. Oxon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351000635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keysar, B., Hayakawa, S. L., & An, S. G. (2012). The foreign-language effect: Thinking in a foreign tongue reduces decision biases. Psychological Science, 23(6), 661–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611432178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, H. (2021). The implicit ideological function of the global health field and its role in maintaining relations of power. BMJ Global Health, 6, e005620. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitchen, M. C. (2013). Methods in focus group interviews in cross-cultural settings. Qualitative Research Journal, 13(3), 265–7. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ- 01-2013-0005.Google Scholar
Kodjo, C. (2009). Cultural competence in clinician communication. Pediatrics in Review, 30(2), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1542/pir.30.2.57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krzyżanowski, M. (2008). Analyzing focus group discussions. In Wodak, R. & Krzyzanowski, M. (eds.), Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences (pp. 162–181). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladegaard, H. J. (2023). Migrant Workers’ Narratives of Return: Alienation and Identity Transformations. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003263005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladegaard, H. J., & Phipps, A. (2020). Intercultural research and social activism. Language and Intercultural Communication, 20(2), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2020.1729786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, B., & Turnbull, M. (2024). The role of family doctors in developing primary care systems in Asia: A systematic review of qualitative research conducted in middle-income countries 2010–2020. BMC Family Practice, 25(1), 346. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02585-0.Google Scholar
Liao, T. F., & Gan, R. Y. (2020). Filipino and Indonesian migrant domestic workers in Hong Kong: Their life courses in migration. The American Behavioral Scientist, 64(6), 740–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764220910229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, Y., & Zhang, A. T. (2016). The link between migration and health. In Thomas, F. and Gideon, J. (eds.), Handbook of Migration and Health (pp. 19–43). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784714789.00011.Google Scholar
Madriz, E. I. (1998). Using focus groups with lower socioeconomic status Latina Women. Qualitative Inquiry, 4(1), 114–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049800400107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maneze, D., DiGiacomo, M., Salamonson, Y., Descallar, J., & Davidson, P. M. (2015). Facilitators and barriers to health-seeking behaviours among Filipino migrants: Inductive analysis to inform health promotion. BioMed Research International, 2015(1), 506269. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/506269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mao, Y., & Ahmed, R., (2017). Introduction: Health communication at the crossroads of culture and migration. In Mao, Y. & Ahmed, R., (eds.), Culture, Migration, and Health Communication in a Global Context (pp. 10–23). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, G. S., & Crichton, J. (2020). Intercultural communication in health care settings. In Jackson, J., (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Intercultural Communication, (2nd ed., pp. 503–20). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003036210-38.Google Scholar
Martin, J. N. & Nakayama, T. K. (1999). Thinking dialectically about culture and communication. Communication Theroy, 9(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCaffery, K., Borril, J., Williamson, S. et al. (2001). Declining the offer of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for bowel cancer: A qualitative investigation of the decision-making process. Social Science & Medicine, 53(5), 679–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00375-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCutchan, G., Weiss, B., Quinn-Scoggins, H. et al. (2021). Psychosocial influences on help-seeking behaviour for cancer in low-income and lower middle-income countries: A mixed-methods systematic review. BMJ Global Health, 6, e004213. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miike, Y. (2003). Beyond eurocentrism in the intercultural field: Searching for an asiacentric paradigm. In Starosta, W. J. & Chen, G., (eds.), Ferment in the Intercultural Field: Axiology/Value/Praxis (pp. 243–276). Thousand Oaks: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452229720.n9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miike, Y. (2006). Non-Western theory in Western research? An Asiacentric agenda for Asian communication studies. Review of Communication, 6(1/2), 4–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miike, Y. (2007). An Asiacentric reflection on Eurocentric bias in communication theory. Communication Monographs, 74 (2), 272–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molassiotis, A., Yates, P., Li, Q. et al. (2019). Mapping unmet supportive care needs, quality-of-life perceptions and current symptoms in cancer survivors across the Asia-Pacific region: Results from the International STEP Study. Annals of Oncology, 30(3), 493. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy094.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mori, M., Lin, C. P., Cheng, S. Y. et al. (2023). Communication in cancer care in Asia: A narrative review. JCO Global Oncology, 9, e2200266. https://doi.org/10.1200/GO.22.00266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mukherjee, S. (2010). The Emperor of All Maladies: A Biography of Cancer. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Nakayama, T., K., & Martin, J. N. (2023). Intercultural communication and dialectics revisted. In Nakayama, T. K. and Halualani, R. T., (eds.), The Handbook of Critical Intercultural Communication (2nd ed., pp. 41–55). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119745426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng, C. J., Teo, C. H., Abdullah, N. et al. (2015). Relationships between cancer pattern, country income and geographical region in Asia. BMC Cancer, 15, 613. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1615-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oetzel, J. (2014). Intercultural health communication. In Thompson, T. L., (ed.), Encyclopedia of Health Communication, (Vol. 2, pp. 734–7). Thousand Oaks: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483346427.n285.Google Scholar
Oktavianus, J., & Bautista, J. R. (2023). Motivating healthcare professionals to correct online health misinformation: The roles of subjective norm, third-person perception, and channel differences. Computers in Human Behavior, 147, 107839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, C. L., Fritzson, E., Gnall, K. E. et al. (2021). Resilience across the transition to cancer survivorship. Research in Human Development, 18(3), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2021.1960771.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parreñas, R. (2020). The mobility pathways of migrant domestic workers. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 47(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1744837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parreñas, R. S. (2001). Transgressing the nation-state: The partial citizenship and ‘imagined (global) community’ of migrant Filipina domestic workers. Signs, 26(4), 1129–54. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230101821_6.Google ScholarPubMed
Paternotte, E., van Dulmen, S., van der Lee, N. et al. (2015). Factors influencing intercultural doctor–patient communication: A realist review. Patient Education and Counseling, 98(4), 420–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.11.018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peng, I. (2017). Transnational migration of domestic and care workers in Asia Pacific. www.ilo.org/publications/transnational-migration-domestic-and-care-workers-asia-pacific.Google Scholar
Peprah, P., Agyemang-Duah, W., Arimiyaw, A. W., Morgan, A. K., & Nachibi, S. U. (2021). Removing barriers to healthcare through an intercultural healthcare system: Focus group evidence. Journal of Integrative Medicine, 19(1), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joim.2020.08.008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Philippine Statistics Authority. (2024, September 13). 2023 overseas Filipino workers (final results). https://psa.gov.ph/statistics/survey/labor-and-employment/survey-overseas-filipinos.Google Scholar
Phillimore, J., Bradby, H., Knecht, M. et al. (2019). Bricolage as conceptual tool for understanding access to healthcare in superdiverse populations. Social Theory & Health, 17, 231–52. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41285-018-0075-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piacentini, T., O’Donnell, C., Phipps, A. et al. (2019). Moving beyond the ‘language problem’: Developing an understanding of the intersections of health, language and immigration status in interpreter-mediated health encounters. Language and Intercultural Communication, 19(3), 256–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2018.1486409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piller, I. (2011). Intercultural Communication: A Critical Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Piper, N. (2017). Global governance of labour migration: From ‘management’ of migration to an integrated rights-based approach. In Drahos, P., (ed.), Regulatory Theory: Foundations and Applications (pp. 375–92). Canberra: ANU Press. https://doi.org/10.22459/RT.02.2017.Google Scholar
Pizzoli, S. F. M., Renzi, C., Arnaboldi, P., Russell-Edu, W. & Pravettoni, G. (2019). From life-threatening to chronic disease: Is this the case of cancers? A systematic review. Cogent Psychology, 6(1), 1577593. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2019.1577593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plage, S. (2021). Deploying normality: Cancer survivor identity and authenticity in ritual-like practice. Medical Anthropology, 40(5), 473–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2021.1909582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pun, J. K., Chan, E. A., Wang, S., & Slade, D. (2018). Health professional-patient communication practices in East Asia: An integrative review of an emerging field of research and practice in Hong Kong, South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, and Mainland China. Patient Education and Counseling, 101(7), 1193–1206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2018.01.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ralph, A. P., McGrath, S. Y., Armstrong, E. et al. (2023). Improving outcomes for hospitalised First Nations peoples through greater cultural safety and better communication: The communicate study partnership study protocol. Implementation Science, 18(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-023-01276-1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robb, K. A., Simon, A. E., Miles, A., & Wardle, J. (2014). Public perceptions of cancer: A qualitative study of the balance of positive and negative beliefs. BMJ Open, 4(7), e005434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, C. (2007). Intercultural communication in healthcare settings. In Kotthoff, H. & Spencer-Oatey, H., (eds.), Handbook of Intercultural Communication (pp. 243–62). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, K. L., Schwartz, J. L., Lahman, M. K. E., & Geist, M. R. (2011). Culturally responsive focus groups: Reframing the research experience to focus on participants. International Jounal of Qualitative Methods, 10(4), 400–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691101000407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, M. G., & Macagno, F. (2022). Intercultural pragmatics in healthcare communication. In Kecskes, I., (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Pragmatics (pp. 652–82). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108884303.026.Google Scholar
Rother, S. (2022). The ‘gold standard’ for labour export? The role of civil society in shaping multi-level Philippine migration policies. Third World Quarterly, 43(7), 1607–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2021.2015314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salisbury, H. (2020). Helen Salisbury: Is transactional care enough? BMJ, 368: m226. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, P. (2025). Clinical Communication: The Ideal of Patient Empowerment and the Reality of Patient Vulnerability and Dependence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samkange-Zeeb, F., Borisova, L., Padilla, B. et al. (2020). Superdiversity, migration and use of internet-based health information – results of a cross-sectional survey conducted in 4 European countries. BMC Public Health, 20, 1263. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09329-6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schouten, B. C., Cox, A., Duran, G. et al. (2020). Mitigating language and cultural barriers in healthcare communication: Toward a holistic approach. Patient Education and Counseling, 103(12), 2604–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2020.05.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, D (2025), "“But our worlds are different!”: reflexivity as a tool to negotiate insider–outsider dilemmas”. Qualitative Research Journal, 25(3), 272–282, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-08-2023-0129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, R. (2021). Global, regional, national burden of breast cancer in 185 countries: Evidence from GLOBOCAN 2018. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 187, 557–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-06083-6.Google ScholarPubMed
Spitzer, D. L., Thambiah, S., Wong, Y. L., & Kaundan, M. K. (2023). Globalization and the health and well-being of migrant domestic workers in Malaysia. Globalization and Health, 19, 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-023-00925-w.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steinberg, D. L. (2015). The bad patient: Estranged subjects of the cancer culture. Body & Society, 21(3), 115–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X15586240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Straiton, M. L., Ledesma, H. M. L., & Donnelly, T. T. (2017). A qualitative study of Filipina immigrants’ stress, distress and coping: The impact of their multiple, transnational roles as women. BMC Women’s Health, 17(1), 72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-017-0429-4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, S., Chen, J., & Wang, F. (2025). Embodied experiences: Reorienting health communication via Chinese culture. Health Communication, 41(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2025.2591289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Surbone, A., Annunziata, M. A., Santoro, A., Tirelli, U., & Tralongo, P. (2013). Cancer patients and survivors: Changing words or changing culture? Annals of Oncology, 24(10), 2468–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdt229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suurmond, J., & Seeleman, C. (2006). Shared decision-making in an intercultural context: Barriers in the interaction between physicians and immigrant patients. Patient Education and Counseling, 60(2), 253–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2005.01.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svetelj, T. (2018). Philosophy of interculturality: Philosophy of humanism for our time. Social Identities, 24(3), 395–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2017.1387040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tangcharoensathien, V., Cetthakrikul, N., Lekagu, A. et al. (2023). Global health inequities: A call for papers. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 101(4), 230. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.23.289906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teal, C. R., & Street, R. L. (2009). Critical elements of culturally competent communication in the medical encounter: A review and model. Social Science & Medicine, 68(3), 533–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.10.015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The Lancet Regional Health-Southeast Asia. (2023). Cancer in Southeast Asia: Can we do better? The Lancet Regional Health. Southeast Asia, 12, 100216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lansea.2023.100216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trusson, D., Pilnick, A., & Roy, S. (2016). A new normal?: Women’s experiences of biographical disruption and liminality following treatment for early stage breast cancer. Social Science and Medicine, 151, 121–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.01.011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turnbull, M., & Reich, A. (2023). Using Foucault to (re)think localisation in chronic disease care: Insights for nursing practice. Nursing Philosophy, 24(1), e12392. https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turnbull, M., Ching, T., & Yu, C. (2023). Perceptions of health and coping strategies among temporary migrant workers in East and Southeast Asia: A systematic review. International Journal for Equity in Health, 22(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-023-01840-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turnbull, M., & Wu, X. I. (2023). Emotional reflexivity during a global health crisis: Emotion ‘work’ in online health communication research. In Consoli, S. & Ganassin, S., (eds.), Reflexivity in Applied Linguistics Research: Opportunities, Challenges and Suggestions (pp. 17–34). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Turnbull, M., Yu, C., & Wu, X. I. (2023). Practitioner accounts of end-of-life communication in Hong Kong, Mainland China and Taiwan: A systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling, 106, 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2022.10.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turnbull, M., Yu, C., & Tay, D. (2024). ‘We need to go back home (to) the Philippines healthy’: An interpretive phenomenological analysis of migrant domestic workers’ experiences of having breast cancer in Hong Kong. Qualitative Health Research, 34(8–9), 865–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323241228789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turnbull, M., Neupane, M., & Oktavianus, . (2025). Cancer as communication work: A qualitative study of Filipino migrant domestic workers with cancer in Hong Kong. Social Science & Medicine, 383, 118477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2022). World population prospects 2022: Summary of results. www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/wpp2022_summary_of_results.pdf.Google Scholar
United Nations. (2024, February 1). Cancer rates set to rise 77 per cent by 2050. https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/02/1146127#:~:text=Global%20cancer%20cases%20are%20expected%20to%20rise%20around,Thursday%2C%20highlighting%20the%20growing%20burden%20of%20the%20disease.Google Scholar
United Nations. (2025). Standard country or area codes for statistical use (M49). https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49/.Google Scholar
United Nations, Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). (2024). Asia-Pacific migration report 2024: Assessing implementation of the global compact for migration. www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/2025-01/25-001_escap-2024-rp-apmr-2024.pdf.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, D., Allemani, C., Kaufman, C. et al. (2021). New frontiers for fairer breast cancer care in a globalized world. European Journal of Breast Health, 17(2), 86–94. https://doi.org/10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2021.2021-1-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vineis, P., & Wild, C. P. (2014). Global cancer patterns: Causes and prevention. The Lancet, 383(9916), 549–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62224-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vrinten, C., McGregor, L. M., Heinrich, M. et al. (2017). What do people fear about cancer? A systematic review and meta‐synthesis of cancer fears in the general population. Psycho-Oncology, 26(8), 1070–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vrinten, C., Waller, J., von Wagner, C., & Wardle, J. (2015). Cancer fear: Facilitator and deterrent to participation in colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 24(2), 400–5. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0967.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, B., Gallois, C., Hewett, D. G., & Jones, L. (2012). Culture and health care: Intergroup communication and its consequences. In Jackson, J., (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Intercultural Communication (pp. 510–22). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203805640.Google Scholar
Werder, O. (2024). Transformational Health Communication: A New Perspective on Healthcare and Prevention. Sydney: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, F. & Jeanetta, S. C. (2016). Lived experiences of breast cancer survivors after diagnosis, treatment and beyond: Qualitative study. Health Expectations, 19(3), 631–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization. (2024, May 20). ‘All for health, health for all’ sets the stage for the Seventy-seventh World Health Assembly. www.who.int/news/item/23-05-2024-all-for-health–health-for-all–sets-the-stage-for-the-seventy-seventh-world-health-assembly.Google Scholar
Yin, J. (2022). Rethinking Eurocentric visions in feminist communication research: Asiacentric womanism as a theoretical framework. In Miike, Y. and Yin, J., (eds.), The Handbook of Global Interventions in Communication Theory (pp. 188–214). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, X. (2023). Challenges and barriers in intercultural communication between patients with immigration backgrounds and health professionals: A systematic literature review. Health Communication, 38(4), 824–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1980188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.1 AA
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The HTML of this Element
complies with version 2.1 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), covering newer accessibility requirements and improved
user experiences and achieves the intermediate
(AA)
level of WCAG compliance, covering a wider range of accessibility requirements.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Structural and Technical Features
ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.