Element contents
Mapping Global Digital Political Inequality
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 August 2026
Summary
Inequality is an essential concept for understanding the impact of digital media on political life. This Element offers an empirical portrait of digital political inequality globally. We find that gaps in online political information reception and engagement are prevalent worldwide and growing over time. These inequalities are related to the resources held by individuals, the experiences of groups, and the economic, democratic, and technological development of societies. Moreover, we find that digital political media use is associated with greater participation in electoral politics and belief in democracy, while at the same time lower political trust and satisfaction with political systems. Based on these findings, we offer an agenda for studying digital political inequality across societal, technological, institutional, and individual levels. Ultimately, digital media not only create walls that separate the political haves and have-nots, but also windows and doors to greater political voice and influence for the less powerful.
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781009514187Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 27 August 2026
References
Ahmed, S., & Madrid-Morales, D. (2021). Is it still a man’s world? Social media news use and gender inequality in online political engagement. Information, Communication & Society, 24(3), 381–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1851387.Google Scholar
Ahmed, S., Cho, J., Jaidka, K., Eichstaedt, J. C., & Ungar, L. H. (2020). The internet and participation inequality: A multilevel examination of 108 countries. International Journal of Communication, 14(2020), 1542–1563. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/11314.Google Scholar
Ahmed, S., Madrid-Morales, D., & Tully, M. (2022). Social media, misinformation, and age inequality in online political engagement. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 20(3), 269–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2022.2096743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, D. S. (2023). Justice by means of democracy. The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, D., & Light, J. S. (2015). From Voice to Influence: Understanding Citizenship in a Digital Age. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailard, C. S. (2014). Democracy’s double-edged sword: How internet use changes citizens’ views of their government. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/book.72112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailard, C. S. (2012). A Field Experiment on the Internet’s Effect in an African Election: Savvier Citizens, Disaffected Voters, or Both?, Journal of Communication, 62 (2), 330–344, https://doi-org.proxy.library.ucsb.edu/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01632.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balkin, J. M. (2004). Digital speech and democratic culture: A theory of freedom of expression for the information society. New York University Law Review, 79(1), 1–58. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.470842.Google Scholar
Barnidge, M., & Xenos, M. A. (2021). Social media news deserts: Digital inequalities and incidental news exposure on social media platforms. New Media & Society, 26(1), 368–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211059529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, W. L. (2012). The Personalization of Politics Political Identity, Social Media, and Changing Patterns of Participation. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212451428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, W. L. (2007). Civic life online: Learning how digital media can engage youth. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7893.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernauer, J., & Vatter, A. (2012). Can’t get no satisfaction with the Westminster model? Winners, losers and the effects of consensual and direct democratic institutions on satisfaction with democracy. European Journal of Political Research, 51(4), 435–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.02007.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, S. J., Krueger, B. S., & Ladewig, J. (2008). The effect of risk perceptions on online political participatory decisions. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 4(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1300/J516v04n01_02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bimber, B. (2003). Information and American democracy: Technology in the evolution of political power. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boczkowski, P. J., & Mitchelstein, E. (2019). The politics of contextualization in the contextualization of political communication research. Political Communication, 36(4), 676–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1670903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulianne, S. (2022). Participatory inequality across countries: Contacting public officials online and offline. Social Science Computer Review, 41(4), 1336–1362. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393211071067.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boulianne, S., Koc-Michalska, K., & Bimber, B. (2020). Mobilizing media: Comparing TV and social media effects on protest mobilization. Information, Communication & Society, 23(5), 642–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1713847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulianne, S., & Shehata, A. (2022). Age differences in online news consumption and online political expression in the United States, United Kingdom, and France. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 27(3), 763–783. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211060271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boulianne, S., Oser, J., & Hoffmann, C. P. (2023). Powerless in the digital age? A systematic review and meta-analysis of political efficacy and digital media use. New Media & Society, 25(9), 2512–2536. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231176519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butkowski, C. P. (2023). “If you didn’t take a selfie, did you even vote?”: Embodied mass communication and citizenship models in “I voted” selfies. New Media & Society, 25(9), 2399–2418. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211068937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodnax, N. M., & Sapiezynski, P. (2022). From Home Base to Swing States: The Evolution of Digital Advertising Strategies during the 2020 US Presidential Primary. Political Research Quarterly, 75, 2, 460–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruns, A. (2009). Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and beyond: From production to produsage. Lang.Google Scholar
Castells, M. (2015). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the internet age. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Ceron, A. (2015). Internet, news, and political trust: The difference between social media and online media outlets. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(5), 487–503. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cevallos, A. (2025, March). How autocrats weaponize AI – and how to fight back. Journal of Democracy. www.journalofdemocracy.org/online-exclusive/how-autocrats-weaponize-ai-and-how-to-fight-back/.Google Scholar
Chambers, S. (2023). Deliberative democracy and the digital public sphere: Asymmetrical fragmentation as a political not a technological problem. Constellations, 30(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, M. (2016). Social network sites and political engagement: Exploring the impact of Facebook connections and uses on political protest and participation. Mass Communication and Society, 19(4), 430–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2016.1161803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, W. C. (2018). Media use and satisfaction with democracy: Testing the role of political interest. Social Indicators Research, 140(3), 999–1016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1806-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, J., Ahmed, S., Keum, H., Choi, Y. J., & Lee, J. H. (2018). Influencing myself: Self-reinforcement through online political expression. Communication Research, 45(1), 83–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650216644020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coles, S. M., Kreiss, D., Lane, D. S., & McGregor, S. C. (2025). Toward a group theory of political communication. Journal of Communication, jqaf 049. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaf049.Google Scholar
Cowell, F. A., & Flachaire, E. (2017). Inequality with ordinal data. Economica, 84(334), 290–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.12232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, S. C., & Maggiotto, M. A. (1982). Measuring political efficacy. Political Methodology, 8(3), 85–109. www.jstor.org/stable/25791157.Google Scholar
Dahlgren, P. (2000). The internet and the democratization of civic culture. Political Communication, 17(4), 335–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600050178933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, R. J. (2017). The participation gap: Social status and political inequality. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daminov, I. (2024). Relationship between the type of media consumption and political trust in the European Union: Evidence from the 94th Eurobarometer 2020/2021 survey. Communication and the Public, 9(3), 295–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/20570473241256484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daoudi, O., Gainous, J., Wagner, K., & Buckles, G. (2025). Digital information consumption, democratic context, perceived corruption and political trust: A global examination. Online Information Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-06-2023-0296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, D. (2024). Does political trust matter? A meta-analysis on the consequences of trust. Political Behavior, 46(4), 2241–2262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-024-09916-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, L. (Ed.). (1994). Political culture and democracy in developing countries: Textbook edition. Lynne Rienner Publ.Google Scholar
Dubrow, J. K. (2014). Political inequality in an age of democracy: Cross-national perspectives. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203797907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earl, J., & Kimport, K. (2011). Digitally enabled social change: Activism in the internet age. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einstein, K. L., Glick, D. M., & Palmer, M. (2019). Neighborhood Defenders: Participatory Politics and America’s Housing Crisis. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einstein, K. L., Glick, D., Godinez Puig, L., & Palmer, M. (2023). Still muted: The limited participatory democracy of Zoom public meetings. Urban Affairs Review, 59(4), 1279–1291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, K. J. (2023). Democracy for Busy People. University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/D/bo194847654.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Social Survey. (2020). ESS Round 10 Source Questionnaire. London: ESS ERIC Headquarters c/o City, University of London. www.europeansocialsurvey.org/sites/default/files/2023-06/ESS-Round-10-Source-Questionnaire_FINAL_Alert-06.pdf.Google Scholar
Ferree, M. M. (2002). Shaping abortion discourse: Democracy and the public sphere in Germany and the United States. Cambridge University Press. https://doi-org.proxy.library.ucsb.edu/10.1017/CBO9780511613685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, J., Cruz, C., & Lee, J. Y. (2015). Perpetuating online sexism offline: Anonymity, interactivity, and the effects of sexist hashtags on social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 436–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, 25 /26, 56–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/466240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freelon, D., McIlwain, C. D., & Clark, M. D. (2016). Beyond the hashtags: #Ferguson, #BlackLivesMatter, and the online struggle for offline justice. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–92. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2747066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagrčin, E. (2023). Social media and citizens’ role in politics. Exploring relational and contextual aspects of citizenship norms [Doctoral dissertation, Freie Universität Berlin]. Refubium. http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-38358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagrčin, E. (2024). “Who, if not me?’ How political self-categorizations shape the meaning of political self-expression on social media as a citizenship norm.” Information, Communication & Society, 27(1), 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2023.2174792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagrčin, E., & Porten-Cheé, P. (2023). Between individual and collective social effort: Vocabularies of informed citizenship in different information environments. International Journal of Communication, 17, 1510–1529. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/17240/4065.Google Scholar
Gainous, J., Wagner, K. M., & Gray, T. (2016). Internet freedom and social media effects: Democracy and citizen attitudes in Latin America. Online Information Review, 40(5), 712–738. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-11-2015-0351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehrke, M., & Pasitselska, O. (2024). Disinformation and Identity(-based Features) in Political Communication Research. Political Communication Report, 30. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-98563-6.Google Scholar
George, C. (2022). If political communication is Western in all but name, why not just rename it? The case for provincialising the field (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 4127203). SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4127203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2016). Cognitive benefits for senders. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(1), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016654438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilardi, F., Gessler, T., Kubli, M., & Müller, S. (2022). Social media and political agenda setting. Political Communication, 39(1), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2021.1910390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gimpel, J. G., Kaufmann, K. M., & Pearson-Merkowitz, S. (2007). Battleground States versus Blackout States: The Behavioral Implications of Modern Presidential Campaigns. The Journal of Politics, 69(3), 786–797. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00575.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregg, B. (2018). The coming political: Challenges of artificial intelligence. Digital Culture & Society, 4(1), 157–180. https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/13530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimes, A., Jenkins, S. P., & Tranquilli, F. (2023). The relationship between subjective wellbeing and subjective wellbeing inequality: An important role for skewness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 24(1), 309–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-022-00591-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groshek, J. (2009). The democratic effects of the internet, 1994–2003: A cross-national inquiry of 152 countries. International Communication Gazette, 71(3), 115–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048508100909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guess, A., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. (2019). Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook. Science Advances, 5(1), eaau4586. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau4586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Habermas, J. (2023). A new structural transformation of the public sphere and deliberative politics. Polity.Google Scholar
Haenschen, K. (2020). Self-reported versus digitally recorded: Measuring political activity on Facebook. Social Science Computer Review, 38(5), 567–583. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318813586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haerpfer, C., Inglehart, R., Moreno, A. et al. (Eds.). (2020). World Values Survey: Round Seven – Country-pooled datafile. JD Systems Institute & WVSA Secretariat. https://doi.org/10.14281/18241.1.Google Scholar
Häggblom, E. (2024). The trade-off between political trust and political participation. Political Studies Review, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/14789299241304611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi-org.proxy.library.ucsb.edu/10.1017/CBO9780511790867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, J. T., Naaman, M., & Levy, K. (2020). AI-mediated communication: Definition, research agenda, and ethical considerations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(1), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helsper, E. J. (2021). The digital disconnect: The social causes and consequences of digital inequalities. SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiaeshutter-Rice, D., Madrigal, G., Ploger, G., Carr, S., Carbone, M., Battocchio, A. F., & Soroka, S. (2024). Identity Driven Information Ecosystems. Communication Theory, 34(2), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtae006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornsey, M. J. (2008). Social identity theory and self-categorization theory: A historical review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 204–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00066.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, P. N., & Hussain, M. M. (2013). Democracy’s fourth wave?: Digital media and the Arab Spring. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199936953.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddy, L. (2018). The group foundations of democratic political behavior. Critical Review, 30(1–2), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2018.1466857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790881.Google Scholar
Jane, E. A. (2014). “Your a Ugly, Whorish, Slut”: Understanding E-bile. Feminist Media Studies, 14(4), 531–546. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2012.741073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, S. J., Bailey, M., & Foucault Welles, B. (2020). #HashtagActivism: Networks of race and gender justice. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10858.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, S. J., & Foucault Welles, B. (2015). Hijacking #mynypd: Social media dissent and networked counterpublics. Journal of Communication, 65(6), 932–952. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, S. J., & Kreiss, D. (2023). Recentering power: Conceptualizing counterpublics and defensive publics. Communication Theory, 33(2–3), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtad004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, S. P. (2021). Inequality Comparisons with Ordinal Data. Review of Income and Wealth, 67(3), 547–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpf, D. (2017). Analytic activism: Digital listening and the new political strategy. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190266127.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, G., Pan, J., & Roberts, M. E. (2013). How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression. American Political Science Review, 107(2), 326–343. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055413000014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kligler-Vilenchik, N., & Literat, I. (2024). Not Your Parents’ Politics: Understanding Young People’s Political Expression on Social Media. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornberg, A., & Clarke, H. D. (1994). Beliefs about democracy and satisfaction with democratic government: The Canadian case. Political Research Quarterly, 47(3), 537–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299404700301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022). The other divide: Polarization and disengagement in American politics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108923323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, D. S., Weeks, B. E., & Kwak, N. (2022). A repertoire approach to studying inequalities in political social media use. Mass Communication and Society, 26(5), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2022.2137039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, D. S., Lee, S. S., Liang, F., Kim, D. H., Shen, L., Weeks, B. E., & Kwak, N. (2019). Social media expression and the political self. Journal of Communication, 69(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, D. S., Do, K., & Molina-Rogers, N. (2021a). What is political expression on social media anyway?: A systematic review. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 19(3), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2021.1985031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, D. S., Do, K., & Molina-Rogers, N. (2021b). Testing inequality and identity accounts of racial gaps in political expression on social media. Political Communication, 39(1), 79–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2021.1919808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, D. S., Molina-Rogers, N., & Gagrčin, E. (2024). Worn out & tuned out: Does politics fatigue on social media foster participatory inequality among Americans? Mass Communication and Society, 28(3), 387–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2023.2289650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, D. S., Moxley, C. M., & McLeod, C. (2023). The group roots of social media politics: Social sorting predicts perceptions of and engagement in politics on social media. Communication Research, 50(7), 904–932. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502231161400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, D. S., Thorson, K., & Xu, Y. (2021c). Uninterested and unequal?: Examining SES-based gaps in youth political behavior on social media. Information, Communication & Society, 26(4), 663–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1968923.Google Scholar
Lee, S., & Valenzuela, S. (2024). A self-righteous, not a virtuous, circle: Proposing a new framework for studying media effects on knowledge and political participation in a social media environment. Social Media + Society, 10(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051241257953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leighley, J. E., & Vedlitz, A. (1999). Race, ethnicity, and political participation: Competing models and contrasting explanations. The Journal of Politics, 61(4), 1092–1114. https://doi.org/10.2307/2647555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, H., Wang, Y., & Kim, Y. (2023). The rich get richer and the poor get poorer? The effect of news recommendation algorithms in exacerbating inequalities in news engagement and social capital. New Media & Society, 26(12), 7371–7394. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231168572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindell, J., & Mikkelsen Båge, E. (2023). Disconnecting from digital news: News avoidance and the ignored role of social class. Journalism, 24(9), 1980–1997. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849221085389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, A. T., & Meng, A. (2024). Measuring democratic backsliding. PS, Political Science & Politics., 57(2), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909652300063X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz-Spreen, P., Oswald, L., Lewandowsky, S., & Hertwig, R. (2022). A systematic review of worldwide causal and correlational evidence on digital media and democracy. Nature Human Behaviour, 7, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01460-1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maher, T. V., & Earl, J. (2019). Barrier or booster? Digital media, social networks, and youth micromobilization. Sociological Perspectives, 62(6), 865–883. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121419867697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mak, M. K. F. (2021). Explaining the gender gap in news access across thirty countries: Resources, gender-bias signals, and societal development. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 28(3), 533–557. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211049444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marwick, A. E., & Caplan, R. (2018). Drinking male tears: Language, the manosphere, and networked harassment. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 543–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1450568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matassi, M., & Boczkowski, P. J. (2023). To Know Is to Compare: Studying Social Media across Nations, Media, and Platforms. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, S. C. (2019). Social media as public opinion: How journalists use social media to represent public opinion. Journalism, 20(8), 1070–1086. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919845458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, R. C., & Hancock, J. T. (2022). A digital media literacy intervention for older adults improves resilience to fake news. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08437-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morozov, E. (2012). The net delusion: The dark side of Internet freedom. PublicAffairs.Google Scholar
Munger, K., Guess, A. M., & Hargittai, E. (2021). Quantitative description of digital media: A modest proposal to disrupt academic publishing. Journal of Quantitative Description, 1, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.51685/jqd.2021.000.Google Scholar
Nemer, D. (2022). Technology of the oppressed: Inequity and the digital mundane in favelas of Brazil. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neubaum, G., & Weeks, B. (2023). Computer-mediated political expression: A conceptual framework of technological affordances and individual tradeoffs. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 20(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2022.2028694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisbet, E. C., Stoycheff, E., & Pearce, K. E. (2012). Internet use and democratic demands: A multinational, multilevel model of Internet use and citizen attitudes about democracy. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01627.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the internet worldwide. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohme, J., & de Vreese, C. H. (2020). Traditional and “new media” forms and political socialization. In Bulck, K. J. (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of media psychology (pp. 1–9). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119011071.iemp0167.Google Scholar
Obholzer, L., & Daniel, W. T. (2016). An online electoral connection? How electoral systems condition representatives’ social media use. European Union Politics, 17(3), 387–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omidyar, P. (2021, October 28). Opinion | Pierre Omidyar: 6 ways social media has become a direct threat to democracy. Washington Post. www.washingtonpost.com/news/theworldpost/wp/2017/10/09/pierre-omidyar-6-ways-social-media-has-become-a-direct-threat-to-democracy/.Google Scholar
Oser, J., & Boulianne, S. (2020). Reinforcement effects between digital media use and political participation: A meta-analysis of repeated-wave panel data. Public Opinion Quarterly, 84(S1), 355-365. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfaa017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oser, J., Grinson, A., Boulianne, S., & Halperin, E. (2022). How political efficacy relates to online and offline political participation: A multilevel meta-analysis. Political Communication, 39(5), 607–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2022.2086329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otjes, S., Willumsen, D. M., & Ligthart, D. (2025). Government alternation and satisfaction with democracy. West European Politics, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2025.2469208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, Y., Ahmed, S., & Cai, M. (2025). Traditional norms and political inequality: Assessing gender disparities in online political participation across 51 countries. Asian Journal of Communication, 35(1), 24–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2024.2447584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, D. A., Davidson, B. I., Sewall, C. J. R. et al. (2021). A systematic review and meta-analysis of discrepancies between logged and self-reported digital media use. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(11), 1535–1547. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01117-5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Placek, M. (2023). Social media, quality of democracy, and citizen satisfaction with democracy in central and eastern Europe. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 21(1), 6–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2023.2220319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prior, M. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quandt, T. (2018). Dark participation. Media and Communication, 6(4), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i4.1519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, M. E. (2018). Censored: Distraction and diversion inside China’s great firewall. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Saleem, M., & Ramasubramanian, S. (2017). Muslim Americans’ responses to social identity threats: Effects of media representations and experiences of discrimination. Media Psychology, 22(3), 373–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2017.1302345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savaget, P., Chiarini, T., & Evans, S. (2019). Empowering political participation through artificial intelligence. Science and Public Policy, 46(3), 369–380. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, B., Ansolabehere, S., & Luks, S. (2021). Cooperative Election Study Common Content, 2020 (Version 4) [Data set]. Harvard Dataverse. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/E9N6PH.Google Scholar
Schlozman, K., Brady, H., & Verba, S. (2018). Unequal and unrepresented: Political inequality and the people’s voice in the new gilded age. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.23943/9781400890361.Google Scholar
Schlozman, K. L., Verba, S., & Brady, H. E. (2010). Weapon of the strong? Participatory inequality and the internet. Perspectives on Politics, 8(2), 487–509. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592710001210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlozman, K. L., Verba, S., & Brady, H. E. (2013). The unheavenly chorus: Unequal political voice and the broken promise of American democracy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schradie, J. (2012). The trend of class, race, and ethnicity in social media inequality: Who still cannot afford to blog? Information, Communication & Society, 15(4), 555–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.665939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schradie, J. (2018). The digital activism gap: How class and costs shape online collective action. Social Problems, 65(1), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spx042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schradie, J. (2019). The revolution that wasn’t: How digital activism favors conservatives. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shearlaw, M. (2016, August 1). Facebook lures Africa with free internet – But what is the hidden cost? The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/world/2016/aug/01/facebook-free-basics-internet-africa-mark-zuckerberg.Google Scholar
Singh, S. P., & Mayne, Q. (2023). Satisfaction with democracy: A review of a major public opinion indicator. Public Opinion Quarterly, 87(1), 187–218. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfad003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somma, N. M., & Bargsted, M. A. (2018). Political inequality in 38 countries: A distributional approach. Comparative Sociology, 17(5), 469–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoycheff, E., Burgess, G. S., & Martucci, M. C. (2020). Online censorship and digital surveillance: The relationship between suppression technologies and democratization across countries. Information, Communication & Society, 23(4), 474–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2018.1518472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoycheff, E., & Nisbet, E. C. (2014). What’s the bandwidth for democracy? Deconstructing internet penetration and citizen attitudes about governance. Political Communication, 31(4), 628–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2013.852641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauß, N., Huber, B., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2021). Structural influences on the news finds me perception: Why people believe they don’t have to actively seek news anymore. Social Media + Society, 7(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211024966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stromer-Galley, J., Wojcieszak, M., John, N., & Massanari, A. L. (2023). Introduction to the special issue of social media: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Communication, 73(3), 193–197. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqad016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sudulich, L., & Trumm, S. (2019). A Comparative Study of the Effects of Electoral Institutions on Campaigns. British Journal of Political Science, 49(1), 381–399. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123416000570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suk, J., Abhishek, A., Zhang, Y. et al. (2021). #MeToo, networked acknowledgment, and connective action: How “empowerment through empathy” launched a social movement. Social Science Computer Review, 39(2), 276–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319864882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tessler, M. H., Bakker, M. A., Jarrett, D. et al. (2024). AI can help humans find common ground in democratic deliberation. Science, 386(6719), eadq2852. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adq2852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorson, K., & Wells, C. (2016). Curated flows: A framework for mapping media exposure in the digital age. Communication Theory, 26(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorson, K., Xu, Y., & Edgerly, S. (2017). Political inequalities start at home: Parents, children, and the socialization of civic infrastructure online. Political Communication, 35(2), 178–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1333550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toff, B., & Kalogeropoulos, A. (2020). All the news that’s fit to ignore: How the information environment does and does not shape news avoidance. Public Opinion Quarterly, 84(S1), 366–390. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfaa016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toff, B., Palmer, R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2023). Avoiding the news: Reluctant audiences for journalism. Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaccari, C., & Valeriani, A. (2018). Digital political talk and political participation: Comparing established and third wave democracies. SAGE Open, 8(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018784986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaccari, C., & Valeriani, A. (2021). Outside the Bubble: Social Media and Political Participation in Western Democracies. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Aelst, P., Strömbäck, J., Aalberg, T. et al (2017). Political communication in a high-choice media environment: A challenge for democracy? Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Deth, J. W., & Theocharis, Y. (2017). Political participation in a changing world: Conceptual and empirical challenges in the study of citizen engagement. Routledge.Google Scholar
Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & De Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford university press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Duyn, E., Peacock, C., & Stroud, N. J. (2021). The gender gap in online news comment sections. Social Science Computer Review, 39(2), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319864876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Erkel, P. F., & Van Aelst, P. (2021). Why don’t we learn from social media? Studying effects of and mechanisms behind social media news use on general surveillance political knowledge. Political Communication, 38(4), 407–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, K. M., Gray, T. J., & Gainous, J. (2017). Digital information consumption and external political efficacy in Latin America: Does institutional context matter? Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 14(3), 277–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2017.1337601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, M. (2002). Publics and Counterpublics. Zone Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1qgnqj8.Google Scholar
Weeks, B. E., Lane, D. S., & Hahn, L. B. (2022). Online incidental exposure to news can minimize interest-based political knowledge gaps: Evidence from two U.S. elections. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 27(1), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161221991550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, C., & Friedland, L. A. (2023). Recognition crisis: Coming to terms with identity, attention and political communication in the twenty-first century. Political Communication, 40(6), 681–699. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2023.2222267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, I. K., & Laird, C. N. (2020). Steadfast Democrats: How social forces shape Black political behavior (Vol. 19). Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wolfsfeld, G., Sheafer, T., & Althaus, S. (2022). The politics-media-politics approach. In Wolfsfeld, G., Sheafer, T., & Althaus, S. (Eds.), Building theory in political communication: The politics-media-politics approach (pp. 1–31). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197634998.003.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. (2025). World Bank Open Data. Retrieved April 23, 2025, https://data.worldbank.org.Google Scholar
Wu, C., Wilkes, R., & Wilson, D. C. (2022). Race & political trust: Justice as a unifying influence on political trust. Daedalus, 151(4), 177–199. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoo, S. W., Kim, J. W., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2017). Cognitive Benefits for Senders: Antecedents and Effects of Political Expression on Social Media. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(1), Article 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077699016654438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Y., & Wang, Z. (2020). The internet, political trust, and regime types: A cross-national and multilevel analysis. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 21(2), 68–89. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1468109919000203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, L., & Lerman, K. (2016). Attention inequality in social media. arXiv preprint arXiv:1601.07200.Google Scholar
Zhu, A. Y. F., Chan, A. L. S., & Chou, K. L. (2019). Creative social media use and political participation in young people: The moderation and mediation role of online political expression. Journal of Adolescence, 77, 108–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.10.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.1 AA
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The HTML of this Element
complies with version 2.1 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), covering newer accessibility requirements and improved
user experiences and achieves the intermediate
(AA)
level of WCAG compliance, covering a wider range of accessibility requirements.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Structural and Technical Features
ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
Resources available
Unlock full potential of this Element with additional resources.
Explore resources