Element contents
Participatory Creation within French Public Theatre
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 May 2026
Summary
Within French subsidised performing arts institutions, productions involving non-professional contributors have been gaining traction over the last decade. The trend is spearheaded both by artists, seeking to increase their interactions with society, and by public authorities, preoccupied with people-participation. The recent acceleration of this trend notwithstanding, participatory productions have long been a peripheral phenomenon in French institutions, keen to differentiate their work from socio-cultural approaches. This Element investigates the current rise in participatory creation, examining the motivations underpinning it and charting the artistic processes and forms it produces. The aim is to explore the realities of the presumed democratic reinforcement attached to participation, placing particular emphasis on the nature and scope of the democratising modes in play both on and off stage, and discussing how they interact with the prevailing conventions and value systems of French public theatre.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781009530064Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 02 July 2026
References
Abirached, R. ed. (1995). La décentralisation théâtrale. 4. Le temps des incertitudes 1969–1981. Arles: Actes Sud.Google Scholar
Beauvallet, E. (2017). Pièces in situ, l’autre écriture inclusive. Libération, 21 December.Google Scholar
Belfiore, B. (2021). Who Cares? At What Price? The Hidden Costs of Socially-Engaged Arts Labour and the Moral Failure of Cultural Policy. European Journal of Cultural Policy, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549420982863.Google Scholar
Bishop, C. (2006). The Social Turn: Collaboration and its Discontents. Artforum, 44, 178–83.Google Scholar
Bishop, C. (2012). Artificial Hells. Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Blandin-Estournet, C. (2017). Les ‘projets situés’, ou les métamorphoses de l’action culturelle. NECTART, 5(2), 78–86. https://doi.org/10.3917/nect.005.0078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blondiaux, L. (2008). Le Nouvel Esprit de la démocratie: Actualité de la démocratie participative. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Boisson, B., & Denizot, M., eds. (2015). Le Théâtre du Peuple de Bussang: Cent vingt ans d’histoire. Arles: Actes Sud.Google Scholar
Bonet, L., & Négrier, E., eds. (2018). Breaking the Fourth Wall: Proactive Audiences in the Performing Arts, report, www.bespectactive.eu/storage/2019/09/Breaking-the-Fourth-Wall_publication.compressed.pdf.Google Scholar
Coutelet, N., ed. (2008). Firmin Gémier, Le Démocrate du théâtre. Paris: L’Entretemps.Google Scholar
Delhalle, N. (2017). Une expérience du symbolique pour construire la Cité. Études théâtrales, 67(2), 62–66.Google Scholar
Denizot, M. (2008). Du théâtre populaire à la médiation culturelle: Autonomie de l’artiste et instrumentalisation. Lien social et Politiques, 60, 63–74. https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/019446ar.Google Scholar
Dort, B. (1986). La vocation politique. In Dort, B., ed., Théâtres. Paris: Seuil, pp. 233–48.Google Scholar
Doyen, G. (2015). Quarante comédiens amateurs jouent Lucrèce Borgia. Le Parisien, 14 September. https://www.leparisien.fr/hauts-de-seine-92/quarante-comediens-amateurs-jouent-lucrece-borgia-14-09-2000-2001627453.php.Google Scholar
Dupin-Meynard, F., & Négrier, E., eds. (2020). Cultural Policies in Europe: A Participatory Turn? Toulouse: Editions de l’Attribut / Occitanie en scene.Google Scholar
Faivre-Zeller, C. (2006). Firmin Gémier. Héraut du théâtre populaire. Rennes: PUR.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falcon, C. (2019). Peuples et héros populaires sur la scène du Théâtre national populaire de Jean Vilar. In Denizot, M., ed., Théâtre populaire et représentations du peuple. Rennes: PUR, pp. 133–47.Google Scholar
Fischer, D. J. (1977). The Origins of the French Popular Theatre. Journal of Contemporary History, 12(3), 461–97.Google Scholar
Fishkin, J. S. & Mansbridge, J. eds. (2017). The Prospects & Limits of Deliberative Democracy. Dædalus. Journal of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences, 146(3). https://www.amacad.org/sites/default/files/daedalus/downloads/Su2017_Prospects-Limits-of-Deliberative-Democracy.pdf.Google Scholar
Folco, A. (2018). Introduction. 1968-2018, un anniversaire en trompe-l’œil? Revue d’Histoire du Théâtre, 279(3), Special issue: ‘Maison de la Culture de Grenoble. 1968: un édifice, des utopies’, ed. A. Folco. https://sht.asso.fr/1968-2018-un-anniversaire-en-trompe-loeil/.Google Scholar
Garde, U. & Mumford, M. (2016). Theatre of Real People: Diverse Encounters at Berlin’s Hebbel am Ufer and Beyond. London: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginot, I. (2018). Du piéton ordinaire. In Briand, M., ed., Corps (in)croyables. Pratiques amateur en danse contemporaine. Pantin: Centre national de la danse, pp. 25–42.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1992). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Translated by W. Rehg. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hadley, S., & Belfiore, E. (2018). Cultural Democracy and Cultural Policy. Cultural Trends, 27(3), 218–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2018.1474009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamidi-Kim, B. (2013). Les Cités du théâtre politique en France depuis 1989. Montpellier: L’Entretemps.Google Scholar
Harvie, J. (2013). Fair Play – Art, Performance and Neoliberalism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinich, N. (2018). L’Élite artiste. Excellence et singularité en régime démocratique. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Henry, P. (2014). Un nouveau référentiel pour la culture ? Pour une économie coopérative de la diversité culturelle. Toulouse: Éditions de l’attribut.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, M. (2011). Rites of the Republic: Citizens’ Theatre and the Politics of Culture in Southern France. Ontario: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, S. (2011). Social Works: Performing Art, Supporting Publics. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loyer, E. (2008). Les Maisons de la culture, entre sanctuarisation culturelle et messianisme politique. In Artières, P. & Zancarini-Fournel, M., eds. 68, une histoire collective: 1962-1981. Paris: La Découverte, pp. 148–54. https://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-03473681.Google Scholar
Mervant-Roux, M.-M., ed. (2004). Du théâtre amateur. Approche historique et anthropologique. Paris: CNRS Editions.Google Scholar
Mervant-Roux, M.-M., Bordeaux, M.-C. & Caune, J., eds. (2011). Le Théâtre des amateurs et l’Expérience de l’art, Montpellier: L’Entretemps.Google Scholar
Nancy, J.-L. (2000). Being Singular Plural. Translated by R. D. Richardson & A. E. O’Byrne, Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radosavljević, D. (2019). The Heterarchical Director: A Model of Authorship for the Twenty-First Century. In Bradby, D. & Williams, D., eds. Directors’ Theatre. London: Macmillan, pp. 246–67.Google Scholar
Rancière, J. (1999). Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Translated by J. Rose. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Rancière, J. (2004). The Politics of Aesthetics: The Distribution of the Sensible. Translated by G. Rockhill. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Rauch, M.-A. (2008). La déclaration de Villeurbanne. In Poujol, G., ed. Éducation populaire: le tournant des années 70. Paris: L’Harmattan, pp. 129–42.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, P. (2013). The Society of Equals. Translated by A. Goldhammer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruset, S. (2024). L’injonction à produire de la participation dans les créations théâtrales et ses dérives. L’Observatoire, 62(1), 44–50. https://doi.org/10.3917/lobs.062.0044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pateman, C. (1970). Democratic Theory and Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teillet, P. (2017). Ce que les droits culturels f(er)ont aux politiques culturelles. L’Observatoire, 49(1), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.3917/lobs.049.0020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zask, J. (2011). Participer: Essai sur les formes démocratiques de la participation. Bordeaux: Le Bord de l’eau.Google Scholar
Zhong Mengual, E. (2019). L’Art en commun. Réinventer les formes du collectif en contexte démocratique. Dijon: Les Presses du réel.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.1 AA
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The HTML of this Element
complies with version 2.1 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), covering newer accessibility requirements and improved
user experiences and achieves the intermediate
(AA)
level of WCAG compliance, covering a wider range of accessibility requirements.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Structural and Technical Features
ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
Translated by Lucy Garnier