Element contents
Series: Elements in the Problems of God
Problems of God in Descartes
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 April 2026
Summary
This Element discusses the roles played by the idea of God in René Descartes' epistemology, physics, and metaphysics, and problems arising from those roles. Section 1 gives an overview of Descartes' life, works, and reception, focusing on the extent to which he is a religious or a secular thinker. Section 2 focuses on the problem of the Cartesian circle generated by his claim that all human knowledge depends on knowledge of God. Section 3 explains the role of God in Descartes' physics and addresses problems concerning how God's causal activity relates to that of creatures, including how divine providence fits with human freedom and how voluntary bodily actions are consistent with the laws of nature. Section 4 explores Descartes' claim that God freely created the eternal truths, noting its implications for his theory of modality.
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in the Problems of GodOnline ISBN: 9781009287173Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 14 May 2026
References
Note on References
Following standard practice for Descartes scholarship, in-text references to Descartes in this Element refer to the standard English translation and employ the following abbreviations:
Descartes, René (1985a). The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. 1, ed. Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R. and Murdoch, D., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Descartes, René (1985b). The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. 2, ed. Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R. and Murdoch, D., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Descartes, René (1991). The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. 3, ed. Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., Murdoch, D. and Kenny, A., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
References
Alanen, Lilli (1991). Descartes, Conceivability, and Logical Modality. In Horowitz, Tamara & Massey, Gerald J., eds., Thought Experiments in Science and Philosophy, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 65–84.Google Scholar
Archer, Joel & Ragland, C. P. (2021). Descartes on Voluntary Action and Universal Conservation. In Ganssle, Gregory E., ed. Philosophical Essays on Divine Causation, New York and Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Armogathe, Jean-Robert & Carraud, Vincent (2003). The First Condemnation of Descartes’s OEuvres: Some Unpublished Documents from the Vatican Archives. In Garber, Daniel & Nadler, Steven M., eds., Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 67–109.Google Scholar
Bennett, Jonathan (1990). Truth and Stability in Descartes’ Meditations, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 20(sup1), 75–108.Google Scholar
Bennett, Jonathan (1994). Descartes’s Theory of Modality, Philosophical Review, 103(4), 639–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, Deborah (1999). Descartes’ Natural Light Reconsidered, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 37(4), 601–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broughton, Janet (1984). Skepticism and the Cartesian Circle, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 14, 593–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carriero, John Peter (2009). Between Two Worlds: A Reading of Descartes’s Meditations, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Carriero, John Peter (2011). The Cartesian Circle and the Foundations of Knowledge. In Broughton, Janet & Peter Carriero, John, eds., A Companion to Descartes, Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 302–18.Google Scholar
Caton, Hiram (1971). The Problem of Descartes’ Sincerity, Philosophical Forum (Boston), 2, 355–70.Google Scholar
Caton, Hiram (1973). The Origin of Subjectivity; an Essay on Descartes, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Copleston, Frederick (1960). A History of Philosophy, Vol. IV: Descartes to Leibniz, New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Cunning, David (2010). Argument and Persuasion in Descartes’ Meditations, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, E. M. (1978). Descartes against the Skeptics, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, E. M. (1984). Descartes on the Creation of the Eternal Truths, Philosophical Review, 93, 569–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Noce, Augusto (2021). The Problem of Atheism, Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Della Rocca, Michael (1999). “If a Body Meet a Body”: Descartes on Body-Body Causation. In Gennaro, Rocco J. & Huenemann, Charles, eds., New Essays on the Rationalists, New York: Oxford University Press, 48–81.Google Scholar
Della Rocca, Michael (2005). Descartes, the Cartesian Circle, and Epistemology without God, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 70(1), 1–33.Google Scholar
Della Rocca, Michael (2011a). Causation without Intelligibility and Causation without God in Descartes. In Broughton, Janet & Carriero, John, eds., A Companion to Descartes, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 235–50.Google Scholar
Della Rocca, Michael (2011b). Taking the Fourth: Steps toward a New (Old) Reading of Descartes, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 35(1), 93–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeRose, Keith (1992). Descartes, Epistemic Principles, Epistemic Circularity, and ‘Scientia’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 73(3), 220–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doney, Willis (1955). The Cartesian Circle, Journal of the History of Ideas, 16, 324–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry G. (1962). Memory and the Cartesian Circle, Philosophical Review, 71, 504–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry G. (1965). Descartes’ Validation of Reason, American Philosophical Quarterly, 2(2), 149–56.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry G. (1970). Demons, Dreamers, and Madmen: The Defnese of Reason in Descartes’s Meditations, Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry G. (1977). Descartes on the Creation of the Eternal Truths, Philosophical Review, 86, 36–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry G. (1978). Descartes on the Consistency of Reason. In Hooker, Michael K., ed. Descartes: Critical and Interpretive Essays, Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Freddoso, A. J. (1988). Introduction. In On Divine Foreknowledge (Part IV of the Concordia), Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1–81.Google Scholar
Freddoso, A. J. (1991). God’s General Concurrence with Secondary Causes: Why Conservation is Not Enough, Philosophical Perspectives, 5, 553–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garber, Daniel (1993). Descartes and Occasionalism. In Nadler, Steven, ed. Causation in Early Modern Philosophy, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 9–26.Google Scholar
Garber, Daniel (2001). Descartes Embodied: Reading Cartesian Philosophy through Cartesian Science, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gaukroger, Stephen (1995). Descartes: An Intellectual Biography, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Geach, P. T. (1973). Omnipotence, Philosophy: The Journal of the Royal Institute of Philosophy, 48, 7–20.Google Scholar
Hatfield, Gary (2006). The Cartesian Circle. In Gaukroger, Stephen, ed. The Blackwell Guide to Descartes’ Meditations, Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 122–41.Google Scholar
Hauptli, Bruce W. (1983). Frankfurt on Descartes: Consistency or Validation of Reason?, International Studies in Philosophy, 15(1), 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John Paul II, Pope (2012). Memory and Identity: Personal Reflections, London: Hachette UK.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Dan (2002). Descartes’s Creation Doctrine and Modality, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 80(1), 24–41.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Dan (2003). Divine Simplicity and the Eternal Truths in Descartes, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 11(4), 553–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, Anthony (1970). The Cartesian Circle and the Eternal Truths, Journal of Philosophy, 67, 685–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, Anthony (1972). Descartes on the Will. In Butler, R. J., ed. Cartesian Studies, Oxford: Blackwell, 1–31.Google Scholar
Lafleur, Laurence (1950). Descartes’ Role in the History of Science, The Scientific Monthly, 71(1), 11–14.Google Scholar
Laporte, Jean (1988). Le Rationalisme de Descartes, Paris: University Press of France.Google Scholar
Larmore, Charles (1984). Descartes’ Psychologistic Theory of Assent, History of Philosophy Quarterly, 1, 61–74.Google Scholar
Lennon, Thomas (2011). Descartes’s Legacy in the Seventeenth Century: Problems and Polemic. In Broughton, Janet & Carriero, John, eds., A Companion to Descartes, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 467–81.Google Scholar
Macbeth, Danielle (2017). Descartes on the Creation of the Eternal Truths, Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum, 5(1), 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malebranche, Nicolas (1997). Malebranche: The Search after Truth: With Elucidations of the Search after Truth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mancosu, Paolo (2011). Descartes and Mathematics. In Broughton, Janet & Carriero, John, eds., A Companion to Descartes, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 103–23.Google Scholar
Newman, Lex & Nelson, Alan (1999). Circumventing Cartesian Circles, Nous, 33(3), 370–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolan, Lawrence (1997). The Ontological Status of Cartesian Natures, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 78, 169–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osler, Margaret (2011). Descartes’s Optics: Light, the Eye, and Visual Perception. In Broughton, Janet & Carriero, John, eds., A Companion to Descartes, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 124–41.Google Scholar
Paul, Elliot Samuel (2025a). Descartes’s Clarity First Epistemology. In Sylvan, Kurt, Sosa, Ernest, Dancy, Jonathan & Steup, Matthias, eds., The Blackwell Companion to Epistemology, 3rd ed., Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell, 86–91.Google Scholar
Paul, Elliot Samuel (2025b). Descartes’s Method for Achieving Knowledge. In Sylvan, Kurt, Sosa, Ernest, Dancy, Jonathan & Steup, Matthias, eds., The Blackwell Companion to Epistemology, 3rd ed., Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell, 92–98.Google Scholar
Pessin, Andrew (2010). Divine Simplicity and the Eternal Truths: Descartes and the Scholastics, Philosophia, 38(1), 69–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragland, C. P. (2005). Descartes on Divine Providence and Human Freedom, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 87(2), 159–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragland, C. P. (2006a). Alternative Possibilities in Descartes’s Fourth Meditation, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 14(3), 379–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragland, C. P. (2006b). Descartes on the Principle of Alternative Possibilities, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 44(3), 377–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragland, C. P. (2007). Descartes’s Theodicy, Religious Studies: An International Journal for the Philosophy of Religion, 43(2), 125–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragland, C. P. (2016). The Will to Reason: Theodicy and Freedom in Descartes, New York: Oxford Univerity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, Thomas (2001). Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man: A Critical Edition, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Rodis-Lewis, Geneviève (1992). Descartes’ Life and the Development of His Philosophy. In Cottingham, John, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Descartes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 21–57.Google Scholar
Rozemond, Marleen (2008). Descartes’s Ontology of the Eternal Truths. In Hoffman, Paul, Owen, David & Yaffe, Gideon, eds., Contemporary Perspectives on Early Modern Philosophy: Essays in Honor of Vere Chappel, Peterborough, ON: Broadview.Google Scholar
Schmaltz, Tad M. (1991). Platonism and Descartes’ View of Immutable Essences, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 73(2), 129–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmaltz, Tad M. (2007). Descartes on Causation, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skrzypek, Jeremy W. (2019). Existential Import and the Contingent Necessity of Descartes’s Eternal Truths, International Philosophical Quarterly, 59(3), 309–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slowik, Edward 2005. Descartes’ Physics. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Winter 2023 ed.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Benedictus de (2020). Spinoza’s Ethics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Van Cleve, James (1979). Foundationalism, Epistemic Principles, and the Cartesian Circle, Philosophical Review, 88, 55–91.Google Scholar
Van Cleve, James (1994). Descartes and the Destruction of the Eternal Truths, Ratio, 7(1), 58–62.Google Scholar
Van Inwagen, Peter (1993). Metaphysics / Peter van Inwagen, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, Stephen I. (2014). Squaring the Circle in Descartes’ Meditations: The Strong Validation of Reason.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, Norman J. (1982). Descartes’ Uncreated Eternal Truths, New Scholasticism, 56(2), 185–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.0 A
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The HTML of this Element
conforms to version 2.0 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), ensuring core accessibility principles are addressed and meets the basic
(A)
level of WCAG compliance, addressing essential accessibility barriers.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Structural and Technical Features
ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
- 2
- Cited by