Element contents
Series: Elements in World Englishes
World Englishes as Components of a Complex Dynamic System
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 August 2025
Summary
This Element proposes to view World Englishes as components of an overarching Complex Dynamic System of Englishes, against the conventional view of regarding them as discrete, rule-governed, categorial systems. After outlining this basic idea and setting it off from mainstream linguistic theories, it introduces the theory of Complex Dynamic Systems and the main properties of such systems (systemness, complexity, perpetual dynamics, network relationships, the interplay of order and chaos, emergentism and self-organization, nonlinearity and fractals, and attractors), and surveys earlier applications to language. Usage-based linguistics and construction grammar are outlined as suitable frameworks to explain how the Complex Systems principles manifest themselves in linguistic reality. Many structural properties and examples from several World Englishes are presented to illustrate the manifestations of Complex Systems principles in specific features of World Englishes. Finally, the option of employing the NetLogo programming environment to simulate variety emergence via agent-based modeling is suggested.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in World EnglishesOnline ISBN: 9781009289504Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 04 September 2025
References
Aarts, Bas. 1992. Small Clauses in English: The Nonverbal Types. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adamou, Evangelia, & Matras, Yaron. 2023. The Routledge Handbook of Language Contact. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Aitchison, Jean. 2012. Language Change: Progress or Decay? 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algeo, John. 2006. British or American English? A Handbook of Word and Grammar Patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderwald, Lieselotte. 2001. Was/were variation in non-standard British English today. English World-Wide 22, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archangeli, Diana, & Pulleyblank, Douglas. 2022. Emergent Phonology. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Bao, Zhiming. 2015. The Making of Vernacular Singapore English: System, Transfer and Filter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckner, Clay, Blythe, Richard, Bybee, Joan, Christiansen, Morten H., Croft, William, Ellis, Nick C., Holland, John, Jinyun, Ke, Larsen-Freeman, Diane & Schoenemann, Tom. 2009. Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language learning 59(s1), 1–26.Google Scholar
Bernaisch, Tobias. 2015. The Lexis and Lexicogrammar of Sri Lankan English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernaisch, Tobias, & Lange, Claudia. 2012. The typology of focus marking in South Asian Englishes. Indian Linguistics 73(1–4), 1–18.Google Scholar
Biermeier, Thomas. 2008. Word-Formation in New Englishes: A Corpus-Based Analysis. Berlin: Lit Verlag.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2010. The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bossomaier, Terry. 2000. Complexity and neural networks. In Bossomaier, Terry & Green, David G., eds., Complex Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 367–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bossomaier, Terry & Green, David G., eds. 2000. Complex Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Courtney. 1995. Serpents in the Sand: Essays on the Nonlinear Nature of Politics and Human Destiny. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunner, Thomas. 2017. Simplicity and Typological Effects in the Emergence of New Englishes: The Noun Phrase in Singaporean and Kenyan English. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Mark. 2003. Nexus: Small Worlds and the Groundbreaking Science of Networks. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Burkette, Allison, & Kretzschmar, William. 2018. Exploring Linguistic Science: Language Use, Complexity, and Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buschfeld, Sarah. 2013. English in Cyprus or Cyprus English? An Empirical Investigation of Variety Status. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buschfeld, Sarah. 2020. Children’s English in Singapore: Acquisition, Properties, and Use. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Buschfeld, Sarah, Hoffmann, Thomas, Huber, Magnus & Kautzsch, Alexander, eds. 2014. The Evolution of Englishes: The Dynamic Model and Beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buschfeld, Sarah & Kautzsch, Alexander. 2017. Towards an integrated approach to postcolonial and non-postcolonial Englishes. World Englishes 36, 104–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buschfeld, Sarah & Kautzsch, Alexander, eds. 2020. Modelling World Englishes: A Joint Approach towards Postcolonial and Non-postcolonial Englishes. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canagarajah, A. Suresh. 2013. Translingual Practice: Global Englishes and Cosmopolitan Relations. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, J.K. 2003. Sociolinguistic Theory: Linguistic Variation and Its Social Significance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chambers, J.K. 2006–7. Geolinguistic patterns in a vast speech community. Linguistica Atlantica 27–28, 27–36.Google Scholar
Chambers, J.K., & Schilling, Natalie, eds. 2013. The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chernyshova, Elizaveta, Piccoli, Vanessa & Ursi, Biagio. 2022. Multimodal conversational routines: Talk-in-interaction through the prism of complexity. In Lund, Kristine, Fossali, Pierluigi Basso, Mazur, Audrey & Ollagnier-Beldame, Magali, eds., Language Is a Complex Adaptive System: Explorations and Evidence. Berlin: Language Science Press, 131–46.Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny. 1994. Standardization and the English irregular verbs. In Stein, Dieter & van Ostade, Ingrid Tieken-Boon, eds., Towards a Standard English 1600–1800. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 115–33.Google Scholar
Christiansen, Morten, & Kontreras Callens, Pablo. 2022. AI is changing scientists’ understanding of language learning – and raising questions about an innate grammar. theconversation.com, 19 October. https://theconversation.com/ai-is-changing-scientists-understanding-of-language-learning-and-raising-questions-about-an-innate-grammar-190594.Google Scholar
Collins, Peter, & Yao, Xinyue. 2012. Modals and quasi-modals in New Englishes. In Hundt, Marianne & Gut, Ulrike, eds., Mapping Unity and Diversity World-Wide. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, David L. 1999. Linguistic Attractors: The Cognitive Dynamics of Language Acquisition and Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Bot, Kees. 2017. Complexity theory or dynamic systems theory: Same or different? In Ortega, Lourdes & Han, ZhaoHong, eds., Complexity Theory and Language Development: In Celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Bot, Kees, Wander, Lowie & Verspoor, Marjolijn. 2007. A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 10, 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Bot, Kees, HuiPing, Chan, Lowie, Wander, Plat, Rika & Verspoor, Marjolijn. 2012. A dynamic perspective on language processing and development. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 1: 188–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz-Campos, Manuel & Balasch, Sonia, eds. 2023. The Handbook of Usage-Based Linguistics. Newark: Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 2017. Usage-based linguistics. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John. 1985. Competing motivations. In Haiman, John, ed., Iconicity in Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 343–65.Google Scholar
Edwards, Alison. 2016. English in the Netherlands. Functions, Forms and Attitudes. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellegård, Alvar. 1953. The Auxiliary Do: the Establishment and Regulation of Its Use in English. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Ellis, Nick C. 2008. The dynamics of second language emergence: cycles of language use, language change, and language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal 92, 233–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Nick C. 2011. The emergence of language as a complex adaptive system. In Simpson, James, ed., The Routledge Handbook of Applied Linguistics. London: Routledge, 666–79.Google Scholar
Ellis, Nick C., & Larsen-Freeman, Diane, eds. 2009. Language as a Complex Adaptive System. Malden, MA: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Enfield, Nick J. 2023. Scale in language. Cognitive Science 47, article e13341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Filppula, Markku, Klemola, Juhani & Sharma, Devyani, eds. 2017. The Oxford Handbook of World Englishes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga, & Van der Wurff, Wim. 2006. Syntax. In Hogg, Richard & Denison, David, eds., A History of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 109–98.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk, & Cuyckens, Hubert, eds. 2012. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gerstner, Wulfram, Kistler, Werner, Naud, Richard & Paninski, Liam. 2014. Neuronal Dynamics: From Single Neurons to Networks and Models of Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibb, Sophie, Hendry, Fobin Findlay, & Lancaster, Tom, eds. 2019. The Routledge Handbook of Emergence. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Green, David. 2000. Self-organisation in complex systems. In Bossomaier, Terry & Green, David G., eds., Complex Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 11–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grund, Peter & Hartman, Megan, eds., 2020. Studies in the History of the English Language VIII: Boundaries and Boundary-Crossings in the History of English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guastello, Stephen, Koopmans, Matthijs & Pincus, David, eds. 2009. Chaos and Complexity in Psychology: The Theory of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guastello, Stephen, & Liebovitch, Larry. 2009. Introduction to nonlinear dynamics and complexity. In Guastello, Stephen, Koopmans, Matthijs & Pincus, David, eds., Chaos and Complexity in Psychology: The Theory of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–40.Google Scholar
Gwee, Li Sui. 2018. Spiaking Singlish: A Companion to How Singaporeans Communicate. Singapore: Marshall Cavendish Editions.Google Scholar
Han, ZhaoHong. 2019. Profiling Learner Language as a Dynamic System. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Hansen, Beke. 2018. Corpus Linguistics and Sociolinguistics: A Study of Variation and Change in the Modal Systems of World Englishes. Leiden: Brill Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickey, Raymond, ed. 2020. Handbook of Language Contact. 2nd ed. Malden: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin. 2013. Constructional Change in English. Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation, and Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin. 2019. Construction Grammar and Its Application to English. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mie, Hiramoto, Daniel Wong Gonzales, Wilkinson, Leimgruber, Jakob, Jun Jie, Lim & Jessica, X. M. Choo. 2022. From Malay to Colloquial Singapore English: A case study of sentence-final particle sia. In Ngefac, Aloysius, Wolf, Hans-Georg & Hoffmann, Thomas, eds., World Englishes and Creole Languages Today. Vol. I: The Schneiderian Thinking and Beyond. Munich: Lincom, 117–30.Google Scholar
Phil, Hiver, & Ali, H. AI-Hoorie. 2019. Research Methods for Complexity Theory in Applied Linguistics. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas. 2014. The cognitive evolution of Englishes: The role of constructions in the Dynamic Model. In Buschfeld, Sarah, Hoffmann, Thomas, Huber, Magnus & Kautzsch, Alexander, eds., The Evolution of Englishes: The Dynamic Model and Beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 160–80.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas. 2019. English Comparative Correlatives: Diachronic and Synchronic Variation at the Lexicon-Syntax Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas. 2021. The Cognitive Foundation of Post-colonial Englishes. Construction Grammar as the Cognitive Theory for the Dynamic Model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas. 2022. Construction Grammar: The Structure of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas, & Trousdale, Graeme, eds. 2013. The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, John H. 2014. Complexity: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne, Van Driessche, Laetitia & Pijpops, Dirk. 2022. Epicentral influence via agent-based modelling. World Englishes 41, 377–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Henrik Jeldtoft. 2022. Complexity Science: The Study of Emergence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Neil. 2009. Simply Complexity. A Clear Guide to Complexity Theory. Oxford: Oneworld Publications.Google Scholar
Kachru, Braj B. 1985. Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In Quirk, Randolph & Henry, G. Widdowson, eds., English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and Literatures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 11–30.Google Scholar
Kachru, Braj B., ed. 1992. The Other Tongue: English across Cultures. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Keller, Rudi. 1994. On Language Change: The Invisible Hand in Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Koch, Christopher, Lange, Claudia & Leuckert, Sven. 2016. “This hair-style called as ‘duck tail’”: The ‘intrusive as’-construction in South Asian varieties of English and Learner Englishes. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 2, 151–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd. 2021. Syntactic variation in English: A global perspective. In Aarts, Bas, McMahon, April & Hinrichs, Lars, eds. Handbook of English Linguistics, 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 299–322.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd, Lunkenheimer, Kerstin & Ehret, Katharina, eds. 2020. The Electronic World Atlas of Varieties of English. Zenodo. http://ewave-atlas.org.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd & Schneider, Edgar W., in collaboration with Burridge, Kate, Mesthrie, Rajend & Upton, Clive. 2004. A Handbook of Varieties of English: A Multimedia Reference Tool, 2 vols. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd & Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2004. Global synopsis: Morphological and syntactic variation in English. In Kortmann, Bernd, Schneider, Edgar W. et al., eds., A Handbook of Varieties of English: A Multimedia Reference Tool, Vol. 2. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 1142–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd & Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, eds. 2012. Linguistic Complexity: Second Language Acquisition, Indigenization, Contact. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kretzschmar, William R. Jr. 2009. The Linguistics of Speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kretzschmar, William R. Jr. 2014. Emergence of ‘New Varieties’ in speech as a complex system. In Buschfeld, Sarah, Hoffmann, Thomas, Huber, Magnus & Kautzsch, Alexander, eds., The Evolution of Englishes: The Dynamic Model and Beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 142–59.Google Scholar
Kretzschmar, William R. Jr. 2015. Language and Complex Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kretzschmar, William R. Jr. 2022. The emergence of new varieties of English in North America: complex systems. In Kytö, Merja & Siebers, Lucia, eds., Earlier North American Englishes. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroch, Anthony. 1989. Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1, 199–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krug, Manfred. 2000. Emerging English Modals: A Corpus-Based Study of Grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William, 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change. Vol. 1: Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lange, Claudia. 2012. The Syntax of Spoken Indian English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, Claudia. 2016. The ‘intrusive as’-construction in South Asian varieties of English. World Englishes 35, 133–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laporte, Samantha. 2021. Corpora, Constructions, New Englishes: A Constructional and Variationist Approach to Verb Patterning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, Diane. 1997. Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics 18, 141–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, Diane. 2017. Complexity theory: The lessons continue. In Lourdes Ortega & Han, ZhaoHong, eds., Complexity Theory and Language Development: In Celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 11–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, Diane. 2018a. Complexity and ELF. In Jenkins, Jennifer, Baker, W. & Dewey, Martin, eds. The Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca. Abington: Routledge, 51–60.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, Diane. 2018b. Second language acquisition, WE, and language as a complex adaptive system (CAS). World Englishes 37, 80–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, Diane & Cameron, Lynne. 2008. Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leuckert, Sven, Lange, Claudia, Bernaisch, Tobias & Yurchenko, Asya. 2023. Indian Englishes in the Twenty-First Century: Unity and Diversity in Lexicon and Morphosyntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David. 1979. Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David. 1991. How to Set Parameters: Arguments from Language Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lim, Lisa. 2004. Singapore English. A Grammatical Description. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, Lisa. 2007. Mergers and acquisitions: On the ages and origins of Singapore English particles. World Englishes 26, 446–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, Björn, MacNeilage, Peter & Studdert-Kennedy, Michael. 1984. Self-organizing processes and the explanation of language universals. In Butterworth, Brian, Comrie, Bernard & Dahl, Östen, eds., Explanations for Language Universals. Berlin: de Gruyter, 181–203.Google Scholar
Lund, Kristine, Fossali, Pierluigi Basso, Mazur, Audrey & Ollagnier-Beldame, Magali, eds. 2022. Language Is a Complex Adaptive System: Explorations and Evidence. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Mair, Christian. 2013. The world system of Englishes: Accounting for the transnational importance of mobile and mediated vernaculars. English World-Wide 34, 253–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massip-Bonet, Àngels. 2019. Linguistic variation and change: Approach from the perspective of Complex Adaptive Systems. In Massip-Bonet, Àngels, Bel-Enguix, Gemma & Bastardas-Boada, Albert, eds., Complexity Applications in Language and Communication Sciences. Cham: Springer, 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massip-Bonet, Àngels, Bel-Enguix, Gemma & Bastardas-Boada, Albert, eds., 2019. Complexity Applications in Language and Communication Sciences. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matras, Yaron. 2020. Language Contact. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauranen, Anna. 2017. A glimpse of ELF. In Filppula, Markku, Klemola, Juhani, Mauranen, Anna & Vetchinnikova, Svetlana, eds., Changing English: Global and Local Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 223–53.Google Scholar
Mauranen, Anna. 2018. Conceptualising ELF. In Jenkins, Jennifer, Baker, Will & Dewey, Martin, eds., The Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca. London: Routledge, 7–24.Google Scholar
McArthur, Tom. 1998. The English Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McColl Millar, Robert. 2000. System Collapse, System Rebirth: The Demonstrative Pronouns of English 900–1350 and the Birth of the Definite Article. Oxford: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Mehrotra, Raja Ram. 1998. Indian English: Texts and Interpretation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meierkord, Christiane. 2012. Interactions across Englishes: Linguistic Choices in Local and International Contact Situations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiane, Meierkord, & Schneider, Edgar W., eds. 2021. World Englishes at the Grassroots. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend. 2006. Anti-deletions in an L2 grammar: A study of Black South African English mesolect. English World-Wide 27, 111–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend, & Bhatt, Rakesh. 2008. World Englishes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miestamo, M., Sinnemäki, K., & Karlsson, F., eds. 2008. Language Complexity: Typology, Contact, Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minelli, Tullio. 2009. Neurodynamics and electrocortical activity. In Guastello, Stephen, Koopmans, Matthijs & Pincus, David, eds. Chaos and Complexity in Psychology: The Theory of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 73–107.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Melanie. 2021. Introduction to complexity. www.complexityexplorer.org/courses/119-introduction-to-complexity-2021Google Scholar
Mobus, George E., & Kalton, Michael C.. 2015. Principles of Systems Science. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2001. The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2008. Language Evolution. Contact, Competition and Change. London: continuum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S., Coupé, Christophe & Pellegrino, Francois. 2017. Complexity in Language: Developmental and Evolutionary Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S., & Escobar, Anna Maria, eds. 2022. The Cambridge Handbook of Language Contact. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato, & Hoffmann, Sebastian. 2006. Describing verb-complementational profiles of New Englishes. A pilot study of Indian English. English World-Wide 27, 147–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato, & Hundt, Marianne. 2011. Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging the Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Cecil, Proshina, Zoya & Davis, Daniel, eds. 2020. The Handbook of World Englishes. 2nd ed. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu. 2015. Descriptive adequacy of the S-curve model in diachronic studies of language change. In Christina Sanchez-Stockhammer, ed., Can We Predict Linguistic Change? Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 16. www.helsinki.fi/varieng/series/volumes/16/Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick & Laurel, B. Preston, eds. 2014. Measuring Grammatical Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, Lourdes, & Han, ZhaoHong. 2017. Complexity Theory and Language Development: In Celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, Alastair. 2007. Global Englishes and Transcultural Flows. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey, & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rand, William. 2024. An introduction to agent-based modelling. www.complexityexplorer.org/courses/183-introduction-to-agent-based-modeling/Google Scholar
Rissanen, Matti. 1997. The pronominalization of one. In Rissanen, Matti, Kytö, Merja & Heikkonen, Kirsi, eds., Grammaticalization at Work. Studies of Long-term Developments in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 87–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rüdiger, Sofia. 2019. Morpho-Syntactic Patterns in Spoken Korean English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rüdiger, Sofia, & Baratta, Alex. 2025. Transnational Korean Englishes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, G. R., Gil, David, & Trudgill, Peter, eds. 2009. Language Complexity as an Evolving Variable. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, Hans–Jörg. 2020. The Dynamics of the Linguistic System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 1989. American Earlier Black English. Morphological and Syntactic Variables. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 1997a. Chaos theory as a model for dialect variability and change? In Alan, R. Thomas, ed., Issues and Methods in Dialectology. Bangor: Department of Linguistics, University of Wales, 22–36.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 1997b. As as ‘is’. Is as ‘is’?” In Fries, Udo, Müller, Viviane & Schneider, Peter, eds., From Aelfric to the New York Times: Studies in English Corpus Linguistics: Festschrift for Gunnel Tottie. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 33–50.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2003. The dynamics of New Englishes: From identity construction to dialect birth. Language 79, 233–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties Around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2011. English into Asia: From Singaporean ubiquity to Chinese learners’ features. In Curzan, Anne & Adams, Michael, eds., Contours of English and English Language Studies: In Honor of Richard W. Bailey. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 135–56.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2014. New reflections on the evolutionary dynamics of World Englishes. World Englishes 33, 9–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2016a. Grassroots Englishes in tourism interactions. English Today 32(3), 2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2016b. Hybrid Englishes: An exploratory survey. World Englishes 35, 339–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2020a. English Around the World. An Introduction. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2020b. Calling Englishes as Complex Dynamic Systems: diffusion and restructuring. In Mauranen, Anna & Vetchinnikova, Svetlana, eds., Language Change: The Impact of English as a Lingua Franca. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 15–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2020c. Meanderings from early English to World Englishes: A Complex Systems perspective on morphosyntactic changes in wh-pronouns. In Peter Grund & Megan Hartman, eds., Studies in the History of the English Language VIII: Boundaries and Boundary-Crossings in the History of English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 73–105.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2023. The role of prescriptivism in the emergence of New Englishes. In Beal, Joan C., Lukač, Morana & Straaijer, Robin, eds., The Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Prescriptivism. London: Routledge, 103–20.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2025a. Looking forward to meet you: an embryonic pattern in Asian Englishes? In Smith, Adam, Collins, Peter & Korhonen, Minna, eds. World-wide Perspectives on English Usage: Into the Third Millennium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2025b. Pluricentricity versus pluriareality? Areal patterns in the English-speaking world. In Durgasingh, Ryan & Meer, Philipp, eds., Pluricentricity and Pluriareality: Dialects, Variation, and Standards. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 90–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. & Buschfeld, Sarah. 2020. Expanding boundaries of a function word: uses of one in Early Modern and Modern English. In Grund, Peter & Hartman, Megan, eds., Studies in the History of the English Language VIII: Boundaries and Boundary-Crossings in the History of English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 135–66.Google Scholar
Schreier, Daniel. 2005. Consonant Change in English Worldwide: Synchrony Meets Diachrony. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreier, Daniel & Hundt, Marianne, eds. 2013. English as a Contact Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniel, Schreier, Hundt, Marianne & Schneider, Edgar W., eds. 2020. The Cambridge Handbook of World Englishes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schröder, Anne, ed. 2021. The Dynamics of English in Namibia. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumann, John H. 2017. Neural complexity meets lexical complexity. An issue in both language and in neuroscience. In Ortega, Lourdes & Han, ZhaoHong, Complexity Theory and Language Development: In Celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seargeant, Philip & Tagg, Caroline. 2011. English on the internet and a ‘post-varieties’ approach to language. World Englishes 30, 496–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeley, D. A. 2000. Network evolution and the emergence of structure. In Bossomaier, Terry, & Green, David G., eds., Complex Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 51–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siemund, Peter. 2013. Varieties of English: A Typological Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenroos, Merja. 2008. Order out of chaos? The English gender change in the Southwest Midlands as a process of semantically based reorganization. English Language and Linguistics 12, 445–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamaredo, Iván. 2020. Complexity, Efficiency, and Language Contact: Pronoun Omission in World Englishes. Bern: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. 2001. Language Contact: An Introduction. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey, & Kaufman, Terrence. 1988. Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2011. Sociolinguistic Typology: Social Determinants of Linguistic Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ungerer, Tobias, & Hartmann, Stefan. 2023. Constructionist Approaches. Past, Present, Future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verspoor, Marjolijn, Lowie, Wander & van Dijk, Marijn. 2008. Variability in second language development from a dynamic systems perspective. The Modern Language Journal 92, 214–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verspoor, Marjolijn. 2012. Symposium: Dynamic systems/Complexity theory as a new approach to second language development. Language Teaching 45, 533–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vetchinnikova, Svetlana. 2017. On the relationship between the cognitive and the communal: a complex systems perspective. In Filppula, Markku, Klemola, Juhani, Mauranen, Anna & Vetchinnikova, Svetlana, eds., Changing English. Global and Local Perspectives. Berlin, Boston: Mouton de Gruyter, 277–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wee, Lionel. 2003. The birth of a particle: know in Colloquial Singapore English. World Englishes 34, 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, Valentin. 2014. The Present Perfect in World Englishes: Charting Unity and Diversity. Bamberg: University of Bamberg Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, Valentin, Seoane, Elena, & Suárez-Gómez, Cristina, eds. 2016. Re-assessing the Present Perfect. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfram, Walt, & Schilling-Estes, Natalie. 1997. Hoi Toide on the Outer Banks. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Wen, Xu & John, R. Taylor, eds. 2021. The Routledge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.1 AA
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The HTML of this Element
complies with version 2.1 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), covering newer accessibility requirements and improved
user experiences and achieves the intermediate
(AA)
level of WCAG compliance, covering a wider range of accessibility requirements.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Structural and Technical Features
ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
- 10
- Cited by