Element contents
Series: Elements in Ancient Philosophy
Aristippus of Cyrene, Pleasure and the Present
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 December 2025
Summary
This Element offers a new historical account of Aristippus the Elder's views on pleasure and the present. Instead of treating Aristippus as merely proto-Cyrenaic or anachronistically modern, it uncovers in the ancient sources a neglected form of hedonism that endorses a present-focused therapeutic policy, while exploring its underlying motivations. Aristippan hedonism promotes a moment-to-moment disposition to pleasure rather than its maximization through future calculation, supporting a euthymic model of well-being that prioritizes the present. After distinguishing Aristippus from the later Cyrenaics regarding hedonic calculations to maximize pleasure, the Element yet supports continuity with his followers in the cognitive elements of the concept and the experience of pleasure, challenging his alleged sensualism in this way. Once the historical groundwork is in place, the Element introduces the hypothesis of the plasticity of the present, which moves beyond historical interpretation to offer an ethical-psychological account of a sustained focus on present time.
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in Ancient PhilosophyOnline ISBN: 9781009766661Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 08 January 2026
References
Allen, J. (2014) ‘Why There Are Ends of Goods and Evils in Ancient Ethical Theory’ in Lee, M. (ed.), Strategies of Argument. Essays in Ancient Ethics: Epistemology, and Logic, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 231–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bett, R. (2005) Sextus Empiricus: Against the Logicians, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blank, D. (2009) ‘Philosophia and Technē: Epicureans on the Arts’ in Warren, J. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 216–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandom, R. (1994) Making it Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brink, D. O. (2003) ‘Prudence and Authenticity’, Philosophical Review, 112, pp. 215–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brink, D. O. (2011). ‘Prospects for Temporal Neutrality’ in Callender, C. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 353–381.Google Scholar
Bury, R. G. transl. (1935). Sextus Empiricus, Against the Logicians, Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, H. (2011) ‘Beyond Case-Studies: History as Philosophy’ in Mauskopf, S. and Schmaltz, T. (eds.), Integrating History and Philosophy of Science, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 263, pp. 109–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiesara, M. L. (2001) Aristocles of Messene: Testimonies and Fragments, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dalgleish, T. and Caitlin, H. (2023) ‘Transdiagnostic Distortions in Autobiographical Memory Recollection’, Nature Reviews Psychology, 2, pp. 166–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, R. (2023) The Hedonism of Eudoxus of Cnidus, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Diels, H. (19031; 1956 6). Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker: Griechisch und Deutsch, Kranz, W. (ed.), Berlin, Weidmann. ( = DK).Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R. (1960) ed. and comm., Euripides: Bacchae, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. (2013) ed. Diogenes Laertius: Lives of Eminent Philosophers, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Döring, K. (1988) Der Sokratesschuler Aristipp und die Kyrenaiker, Mainz, Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur.Google Scholar
Dozois, D. and Beck, A. (2008) ‘Cognitive Schemas, Beliefs and Assumptions’ in Dobson, K. S., and Dozois, D. J. A. (eds.), Risk Factors in Depression, Oxford, Elsevier/Academic Press, pp. 121–143.Google Scholar
Feldman, F. (2004) Pleasure and the Good Life, Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, T. (2018) ‘The Cyclical Time of the Body and its Relation to Linear Time’, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 25, pp. 47–65.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (2022) The Historiography of Philosophy, Ierodiakonou, K. (ed.), Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furley, W. (1992) ‘Antiphon der Athener. Ein Sophist als Psychotherapeuter?’ Rheinisches Museum fuer Philologie, 135, pp. 198–216.Google Scholar
Giannantoni, G. (1958) I Cirenaici, raccolta delle fonti antiche: Traduzione e studio introduttivo. Naples, Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Giannantoni, G. (1990) ed. Socratis et Socraticorum Reliquiae, Vols. I–IV, Naples, Bibliopolis. (= SSR).Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (2009) ‘The Anecdote: Exploring the Boundaries Between Oral and Literate Performance in the Second Sophistic’ in Johnson, W. A. and Parker, H. N. (eds.), Ancient Literacies: The Culture of Literacy in Greece and Rome, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 96–113.Google Scholar
Gosling, J. C. B (1975) ed. and comm. Plato: Philebus, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gosling, J. C. B. and Taylor, C. C. W. (1982) The Greeks on Pleasure, Oxford, Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graver, M. (2002) ‘Managing Mental Pain: Epicurus vs. Aristippus on the Pre–rehearsal of Future Ills’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, 17, pp. 155–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulick, C. B., trans. (1933). Athenaeus of Naucratis: The Deipnosophists. Volume V, Books 11–12, Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, C., Werner-Seidler, A., Blackwell, S., and Dalgleish, T. (2017) ‘Autobiographical Episodic Memory-Based Training for the Treatment of Mood, Anxiety and Stress-Related Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis’, Clinical Psychology Review, 52, pp. 92–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hitchcock, C., Gormley, S., Rees, C., Rodrigues, E., Gillard, J., Panesar, I., Wright, I. M., Hammond, E., Watson, P., Werner-Seidler, A., and Dalgleish, T. (2018) ‘A Randomised Controlled Trial of Memory Flexibility Training (MemFlex) to Enhance Memory Flexibility and Reduce Depressive Symptomatology in Individuals with Major Depressive Disorder’, Behaviour Research and Therapy, 110, pp. 22–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Indelli, G. and Tsouna-McKirahan, V. (1995) Philodemus: On Choices and Avoidances, Naples, Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Karrp, H. (1933) Untersuchungen zur Philosophie des Eudoxus von Knidos, Würzburg-Aumühle, Triltsch.Google Scholar
Kazantzis, N., Datillio, F. M., Dobson, K. S. and Beck, J. (2017) The Therapeutic Relationship in Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy: A Clinician’s Guide, New York, Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
Kechagia, E. (2011) ‘Philosophy in Plutarch’s Table Talk: In Jest or in Earnest?’ in Klotz, F. and Oikonomopoulou, K. (eds.), The Philosopher’s Banquet: Plutarch’s Table Talk in the Intellectual Culture of the Roman Empire, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 77–104.Google Scholar
Kindstrand, J. F. (1986) ‘Diogenes Laertius and the Chreia Tradition’, Elenchos, 7, pp. 219–243.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1999) ‘The Socratic Legacy’ in Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfelf, J. and Schofield, M. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 617–641.Google Scholar
Mann, W. R. (1996) ‘The Life of Aristippus’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 78, pp. 97–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, J. S. (2018) Autobiography, Philp, M. (ed.), Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouroutsou, G. (2020) ‘The Plasticity of the Present Moment in Marcus Aurelius’ Meditations’, Ancient Philosophy, 40, pp. 411–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouroutsou, G. (2021) ‘Choosing a Life and Rejecting a Thoughtless Life in Philebus 20–22’, Ancient Philosophy, 41, pp. 393–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouroutsou, G. (2024) ‘Therapeutic Presentisms: A Hedonist and a Stoic in Agreement?’, History of Philosophy and Logical Analysis, 26, pp. 321–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouroutsou, G. (in press) ‘The Plasticity of Temporal Attention: Training a Healthier Mind as Inspired by Marcus Aurelius’ in Fuchs, T., The Phenomenology of Emotion Regulation: Feeling and Agency, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O’Keefe, T. (2002) ‘The Cyrenaics on Pleasure, Happiness, and Future–Concern’, Phronesis, 47, pp. 395–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Reilly, K. (2019) ‘Cicero Reading the Cyrenaics on the Anticipation of Future Harms’, Epoché, 23, pp. 431–443.Google Scholar
Rohland, R. A. (2023) Carpe Diem: The Poetics of Presence in Greek and Latin Literature, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. (2015) ‘The First-Generation Socratics and the Socratic Schools: The Case of the Cyrenaics’ in Zilioli, U. (ed.), From the Socratics to the Socratic Schools: Classical Ethics, Metaphysics and Epistemology, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Rudolph, F. (1894) ‘Zu den Quellen des Aelian und Athenaios’, Philologus, 52, pp. 652–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, M. (1988) ‘The Retrenchable Present’ in Barnes, J. and Mignucci, M. (eds.), Matter and Metaphysics: The Fourth Symposium Hellenisticum, Bibliopolis, Naples, pp. 329–374.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (2017) ‘Epicurean vs. Cyrenaic Happiness’ in Seaforth, R., Wilkins, J. and Wright, M. (eds.), Selfhood and the Soul: Essays on Ancient Thought and Literature in Honour of Christopher Gill, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 89–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, Z. V., Williams, M. G. J. and Teasdale, J. D. (2013) Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy of Depression, New York, Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Sellars, W. (1954) ‘Some Reflections on Language Games’, Philosophy of Science, 21, pp. 204–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slote, M. (1989) Beyond Optimizing: A Study of Rational Choice, Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommerstein, A. E., ed. and trans. (2009) Aeschylus. Persians. Seven Against Thebes. Suppliants. Prometheus Bound, Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tarán, L. (1981) Speusippus of Athens: A Critical Study with a Collection of the Related Texts and Commentary, Leiden, Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrant, H. (1994) ‘The Hippias Major and Socratic Theories of Pleasure’ in Vander Waerdt, P. (ed.), The Socratic Movement, Ithaca New York, Cornell University Press, pp. 107–126.Google Scholar
Teodorsson, S. T. (1989) A Commentary on Plutarch’s Table Talks, Vols I–II, Göteborg, Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
Tsouna-McKirahan, V. (1994) ‘The Socratic Origins of the Cynics and the Cyrenaics’ in Vander Waerdt, P. (ed.), The Socratic Movement, Ithaca New York, Cornell University Press, pp. 367–391.Google Scholar
Tsouna, V. (1998) The Epistemology of the Cyrenaic School, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsouna, V. (2002) ‘Is There an Exception to Greek Eudaemonism?’ in Canto-Sperber, M. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.), Le Style de la Pensée: Recueil de Textes en Hommage à Jacques Brunschwig, Paris, Les Belles Lettres, pp. 464–489.Google Scholar
Tsouna, V. (2016) ‘Cyrenaics and Epicureans on Pleasure and the Good Life: The Original Debate and its Later Revivals’ in Weisser, S. and Thaler, N. (eds.), Strategies of Polemics in Greek and Roman Philosophy, Leiden, Brill, pp. 113–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsouna, V. (2020) ‘Aristippus’ in Wolfsdorf, D. C. (ed.) Early Greek Ethics, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 380–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urstad, K. (2018) ‘Aristippus on Freedom, Autonomy and Pleasurable Life’ in Stavru, A. and Moore (eds.), C., Socrates and the Socratic Dialogue, Leiden and Boston, Brill, pp. 179–201.Google Scholar
von Arnim, H. ed. (2004; 19021) Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta. Vols I-IV, München and Leipzig, K. G. Saur Verlag. ( = SVF).Google Scholar
Warren, J. (2001) ‘Epicurus and the Pleasures of the Future’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 21, pp. 135–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, J. (2009) ‘Aristotle on Speusippus on Eudoxus on Pleasure’ in Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 36, pp. 249–281.Google Scholar
Warren, J. (2013) ‘Epicureans and Cyrenaics on Pleasure as a Pathos’ in Marchand, S. and Verde, F. (eds.), Épicurisme et Scepticisme, Roma, Università la Sapienza, pp. 127–144.Google Scholar
Warren, J. (2014a) The Pleasures of Reason in Plato, Aristotle and the Hellenistic Hedonists, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, J. (2014b) ‘Cyrenaics’ in Warren, J. and Sheffield, F. C. C. (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Ancient Philosophy, London, Routledge, pp. 409–422.Google Scholar
Watkins, E. R. (2011) ‘Dysregulation in Level of Goal and Action Identification Across Psychological Disorders’, Clinical Psychology Review, 31, pp. 260–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watkins, E. R. (2016) Rumination-Focused Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Depression, New York and London: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Williams, B. (1995) ‘The Point of View of the Universe: Sidgwick and the Ambitions of Ethics’ in Williams, B., Making Sense of Humanity: And Other Philosophical Papers 1982–1993, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 153–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.1 AA
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The HTML of this Element
complies with version 2.1 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), covering newer accessibility requirements and improved
user experiences and achieves the intermediate
(AA)
level of WCAG compliance, covering a wider range of accessibility requirements.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Structural and Technical Features
ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
- 4
- Cited by