Element contents
Automobility and the Anthropocene
The Car as Post-Human
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 May 2025
Summary
The automobile has transformed Earth's habitats and humans' habits since the 1890s, when it, this Element argues, began the Anthropocene. Climate change now motivates efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, of which cars and trucks account for at least 10 percent. Shifting to electric vehicles is not enough; one needs to better understand the power cars hold over humans. Environmental humanities scholars examine human/machine hybrids but have ignored the most obvious example. Humans driving cars are social agents constituting a civil society of automobility in roadscape environments. This Element traces the evolution of cars from horsecars, carriages, and bicycles, and the influence of Henry Ford and Alfred P. Sloan on labor standards and consumer behaviors. As the car industry pushes high-tech autonomous or self-driving vehicles, it relies on futuristic fantasies and false promises. The ills of automobility cannot be solved with new products that only intensify human dependence upon cars.
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781009526715Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 26 June 2025
References
Adorno, T. 1941. On Popular Music. Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung 9(1), 17–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adorno, T. 1951. Minima Moralia. Trans. D. Redmond, 2005. www.marxists.org/reference/archive/adorno/1951/mm/index.htm.Google Scholar
Adorno, T., and Horkheimer, M.. 1944. Dialektik der Aufklärung. Trans. J. Cumming as Dialectic of Enlightenment. New York: Continuum, 1988.Google Scholar
Alpers, G. W., and Gerdes, A. B. M.. 2006. Another Look at “Look-Alikes”: Can Judges Match Belongings with Their Owners? Journal of Individual Differences 27(1): 38–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badger, E., and Parlapiano, A.. 2022. The Exceptionally American Problem of Rising Roadway Deaths. The New York Times, November 27, 2022, accessed February 4, 2023.Google Scholar
Beckmann, J. 2001. Automobility – A Social Problem and Theoretical Concept. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 19: 593–607. https://doi.org/10.1068/d222t.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beltrán, M. C. 2005. The New Hollywood Racelessness: Only the Fast, Furious, and Multiracial Will Survive. Cinema Journal 44(2): 50–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonine, J. 1975. The Evolution of “Technology-Forcing” in the Clean Air Act. Envir. Rptr. Monograph.Google Scholar
Bradsher, K. 2002. High and Mighty: SUVs – The World’s Most Dangerous Vehicles and How They Got That Way. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
Braidotti, R. 2002. Metamorphoses: Towards a Materialist Theory of Becoming. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Bright, B. 1998. “Heart Like a Car”: Hispano/Chicano Culture in Northern New Mexico. American Ethnologist 25(4): 583–609. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1998.25.4.583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chernow, E. 1973. Implementing the Clean Air Act in Los Angeles: The Duty to Achieve the Impossible. Ecology Law Quarterly 4(3): 537–581.Google Scholar
Clynes, M. E., and Kline, N. S.. 1960. Cyborgs and Space. Astronautics 5(9): 26–27, 74–76.Google Scholar
Cox, C. 2023. Elon Musk’s Appetite for Destruction. The New York Times Magazine, January 17.Google Scholar
Dan Neil Interviews Peter Horbury. 2012. “When Will Chinese Car Design Emerge onto the World Stage?” YouTube Video. The Wall Street Journal. https://youtu.be/Hw2SAxbh5I8?si=FcFZhu7m6y8T9xXi.Google Scholar
Dant, T. 2005. The Driver-Car. Theory, Culture & Society 21: 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276404046061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dant, T. 2009. True Automobility. In Harvey, Penny, Casella, Eleanor Conlin, Evans, Gillian, et al., eds., Objects and Materials: A Routledge Companion. Oxford: Abingdon, 251–259.Google Scholar
Dant, T., and Martin, P. J.. 2001. By Car: Carrying Modern Society. Ordinary Consumption 44: 143–157.Google Scholar
DeWitt, J. 2002. Cool Cars, High Art: The Rise of Kustom Kulture. Jackson: University of Mississippi Press.Google Scholar
Donnelly, N., ed. 2000. Customized: Art Inspired by Hot Rods, Low Riders and American Car Culture. Boston: Harry N. Abrams and The Institute for Contemporary Art.Google Scholar
Edensor, T. 2004. Automobility and National Identity: Representation, Geography and Driving Practice. Theory, Culture & Society 21: 101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esposito, J. & Silverman, L. J.. 1970. Vanishing Air: The Ralph Nader Study Group Report on Air Pollution. New York: The Study Group.Google Scholar
Farber, D. 2002. Sloan Rules: Alfred P. Sloan and the Triumph of General Motors. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Flint, J. M. 1970. GM Sees Autos Fume-Free by ’80. The New York Times, January 15. Accessed July 27, 2022.Google Scholar
Ford, H., and Crowther, S. 1926. Today and Tomorrow. rpt. Cambridge: Productivity Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Furness, Z. 2010. One Less Car: Bicycling and the Politics of Automobility. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Gartman, D. 1994. Auto Opium: A Social History of American Automobile Design. New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
Gasnier, M. 1977. Colombia 1970–1976: Renault 4, the First “Colombian Car,” Brings the Car to the Masses. https://bestsellingcarsblog.com/1977/03/. Accessed October 23, 2024.Google Scholar
Gauthier, I., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J. C., and Anderson, A. W.. 2000. Expertise for Cars and Birds Recruits Brain Areas Involved in Face Recognition. Nature Neuroscience 3: 191–197. https://doi.org/10.1038/72140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gendron, T. 1986. Theodor Adorno Meets the Cadillacs. In Modleski, T., ed., Studies in Entertainment, Bloomington: University of Indiana Press, 18–30.Google Scholar
General Motors. 1940. “To New Horizons.” YouTube Video. U.S. Auto Industry channel. https://youtu.be/aIu6DTbYnog?si=AiN1h26EbFaVibrV.Google Scholar
General Motors and SAIC. May 2011. “2030 Xing!” YouTube Video. https://youtu.be/E995187QoEI?si=WHI83hJ9P6Tg62uF.Google Scholar
General Motors Corporation. 1956. “Key to the Future.” YouTube Video. CBS Sunday Morning Channel https://youtu.be/F2iRDYnzwtk?si=z-5SfONdLqma1jXs.Google Scholar
Gertten, F. “Bikes vs. Cars” 2015. dir. F. Gertten. https://vimeo.com/ondemand/bikesvscars/139735099.Google Scholar
Gilroy, P. 2001. Driving While Black. In Miller, D., ed., Car Cultures, Oxford: Berg, 81–104.Google Scholar
Goddard, Y. 2002. Grammatical Gender in Algonquian. In Papers of the 33rd Algonquian Conference. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba, 195–231.Google Scholar
Gorz, A. 1973. l’Idéologie sociale de la bagnole. Trans. Vigderman, P. and Cloud, J., The Social Ideology of the Motorcar. In Ecology as Politics. Boston: South End, 1980.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. 1985. A Cyborg Manifesto : Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century. In Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. 1990. The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hessler, P. 2005. Car Town: An Upstart Automaker Targets the American Markert. The New Yorker, September 26.Google Scholar
Hvistendahl, M., Ewing, J., & Liu, J., 2024. A Pivot to China Saved Elon Musk. It also Binds him to Beijing. New York: The New York Times.Google Scholar
Keeler, K. 2021. Before Colonization (BC) and after Decolonization (AD): The Early Anthropocene, the Biblical Fall, and Relational Pasts, Presents, and Futures. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space. https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486211033087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keiller, P. 2002. Sexual Ambiguity and Automotive Engineering. In Kerr, J. and Wollen, P., eds., Autopia: Cars and Culture. London: Reaktion, 342–353.Google Scholar
Kerr, L. M. 2000. Garage Wall to Gallery Hall: High Art in Lowbrow Society. In N. Donelly, ed., Customized, 26–31.Google Scholar
Kimmelman, M. 2023. How One City Tried to Solve Gridlock for Us All. The New York Times, December 7, Accessed January 13, 2025.Google Scholar
Kimmerer, R. W. 2015. Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge and the Teachings of Plants. Minneapolis: Milkweed.Google Scholar
Kwon, S. A. 2004. Autoexoticizing: Asian-American Youth and the Import Car Scene. Journal of Asian-American Studies 7(1): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. 1996. Aramis, or the Love of Technology. Trans. C. Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Luke, T. 1996. Liberal Society and Cyborg Subjectivity: The Politics of Environments, Bodies, and Nature. Alternatives 21(1): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupton, D. 1999. Monsters in Metal Cocoons: “Road Rage” and Cyborg Society. Body & Society 5(1): 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malm, A., and Hornborg, A.. 2014. The Geology of Mankind? A Critique of the Anthropocene Narrative. The Anthropocene Review 11: 62–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, W. 1973. Los Angeles and Its Mistress Machine. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 29(4): 44–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, T. 2008. Auto Mania: Cars, Consumers, and the Environment. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McShane, C. 1994. Down the Asphalt Path: The Automobile and the American City. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, J. A. 1941. Fares, Please! From Horse-Cars to Streamliners. New York: D. Appleton-Century.Google Scholar
Mondt, J. R. 2000. Cleaner Cars: The History and Technology of Emission Control since the 1960s. Warrendale, PA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nader, R. 1965. Unsafe at Any Speed: The Designed-In Dangers of the American Automobile New York: Grossman.Google Scholar
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2024. Traffic Safety Facts. Early Estimate of Traffic Safety Fatalities in 2023. Washington, DC: NHTSA.Google Scholar
New York Times. 1872. The Horse Plague: Fifteen Thousand Horses in this City Unfit for Use. October 25.Google Scholar
Niedermeyer, E. 2019. Ludicrous: The Unvarnished Story of Tesla Motors. Dallas: BenBella.Google Scholar
Norton, P. 2021. Autonorama: The Illusory Promise of High-Tech Driving. Washington, DC: Island.Google Scholar
Olmsted, F. L., and Vaux, C., 1868. Observations on the Progress of Improvements in Street Plans, with Special Reference to the Park-Way Proposed to Be Laid-Out in Brooklyn. Brooklyn: I. Van Anden.Google Scholar
Parmesan, C., Pörtner, H. -O., Roberts, D. C., et al. 2022. Terrestrial and Freshwater Ecosystems and Their Services. In Pörtner, H.-O., Roberts, D. C., Tignor, M., et al., eds., Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 197–377, Figure 2.12. 2.13, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844.004.Google Scholar
Paterson, M. 2007. Automobile Politics: Ecology and Cultural Political Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pettis, B. 2023. reCAPTCHA Challenges and the Production of the Ideal Web User. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 29: 886–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, R. C. 1999. Economics at the Wheel: The Costs of Cars and Drivers. San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
Randell, R. 2016. The Microsociology of Automobility: The Production of the Automobile Self. Mobilities. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2016.1176776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roederer, A. 2024. Sacred Hearts and Sacred Cars: The Visual Culture of Latinx Low Riders. Presentation, American Folklore Society Conference, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Sayre, G. 2020. “Carbolization”: Cars, Carbon Emissions, and the Global Discipline of Automobility. In Konrad, T., ed., Accelerating Ride to Global Crisis: Transportation and the Culture of Climate Change. Morgantown: West Virginia University Press, 83–101.Google Scholar
Sayre, G. 2020. The Humanity of the Car: Automobility, Agency, and Autonomy. Cultural Critique 107: 122–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayre, G. 2023. Fordism in Detroit, Consumerism in Los Angeles: A Brief History of Automobile Emissions Regulation and Lessons for Greenhouse Gas Pollution. In Konrad, T., Mitchell, C., and Schaufler, S., eds., Imagining Air: Cultural Axiology and the Politics of Invisibility. Exeter: University of Exeter Press, 37–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sehgal, P. 2024. Who’s Afraid of Judith Butler? May 6. www.newyorker.com/magazine/2024/05/06/judith-butler-profile.Google Scholar
Settis, B. 2019. Rethinking Fordism. In Antonini, F., ed., Revisiting Gramsci’s Notebooks. Lieden: Brill, 376– 387. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004417694_023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaeffer, R. & Sims, R. Transport. In Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 608. https://archive.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/authors.php?q=3&p=8.Google Scholar
Sheller, M., and Urry, J.. 2000. The City and the Car. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 24(4): 737–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorensen, C., and Williamson, S. T.. 1956. My Forty Years with Ford. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Sperling, D., and Gordon, D.. 2009. Two Billion Cars: Driving toward Sustainability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urry, J. 2006. Inhabiting the Car. Sociological Review 54: 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2006.00635.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urry, J. John. 2004. The “System” of Automobility. Theory, Culture & Society 21: 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276404046059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vardi, I. 2011. Auto Thrill Shows and Destruction Derbies, 1922–1965: Establishing the Cultural Logic of the Deliberate Car Crash in America. Journal of Social History 45(1): 20–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veblen, T. 1899. The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Windhager, S., Slice, D. E., Schaefer, K., et al. 2008. Face to Face – The Perception of Automotive Designs. Human Nature 19: 331–346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Windhager, S., Hutzler, F., Carbon, C. C., et al. 2010. Laying Eyes on Headlights: Eye Movements Suggest Facial Features in Cars. Collegium Antropologicum 34: 1075–1080.Google ScholarPubMed
Windhager, S., Bookstein, F., Grammer, K., et al. 2012. “Cars Have Their Own Faces”: Cross-Cultural Ratings of Car Shapes in Biological Stereotypical Terms. Evolution and Human Behavior 33(2): 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.06.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeager, P., Szeman, I., Ziser, M., et al. 2011. Editor’s Column: Literature in the Ages of Wood, Tallow, Coal, Whale Oil, Gasoline, Atomic Power, and Other Energy Sources. PMLA 126(2): 305–326.Google Scholar
Yoon, C. K. 2009. Naming Nature: The Clash between Instinct and Science. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.1 AA
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The HTML of this Element
complies with version 2.1 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), covering newer accessibility requirements and improved
user experiences and achieves the intermediate
(AA)
level of WCAG compliance, covering a wider range of accessibility requirements.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Structural and Technical Features
ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
- 5
- Cited by