Element contents
Eastern Orthodoxy and the Science-Theology Dialogue
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 June 2022
Summary
This Element examines the science-theology dialogue from the perspective of Eastern Orthodox Christianity and provides a critique of this dialogue based on six fundamental aspects of that theology: (i) Its understanding of how philosophy may authentically be used in the theological task; (ii) Its understanding of the use and limitations of scientific and theological languages; (iii) Its understanding of the role of humanity in bringing God's purposes to fulfilment; (iv) its sense that material entities should be understood less in materialist terms than in relation to the mind of God; (v) Its Christological focus in understanding the concept of creation; (vi) Its sense that the empirical world can be understood theologically only when the 'world to come' is taken fully into account. It is argued that Orthodoxy either provides an alternative pan-Christian vision to the currently predominant one or, at the very least, provides important new conceptual insights.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781009106009Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 04 August 2022
Bibliography
Primary Sources
Buxhoeveden, Daniel, and Woloschak, Gayle, eds., Science and the Eastern Orthodox Church (Farnham, UK: Ashgate, 2011)Google Scholar
Dragas, George D., Pavolov, Pavel, and Tanev, Stoyan, eds., Orthodox Theology and the Sciences: Glorifying God in His Marvelous Works (Columbia, MO: New Rome Press, 2016)Google Scholar
Knight, Christopher C., and Nesteruk, Alexei V., eds., Eastern Orthodox Christianity and the Sciences: Theological, Philosophical and Scientific Aspects of the Dialogue (Turnhout: Brepols, 2021)Google Scholar
Theokritoff, Elizabeth, and Knight, Christopher C., ‘20th and 21st Century Orthodox Voices on Nature and Science’, in T&T Clark Handbook of Christian Theology and The Modern Sciences, ed. Slattery, John P. (London: T&T Clark, 2020) 177–90Google Scholar
Woloschak, Gayle E., and Makrides, Vasilios N., eds., Orthodox Christianity and Modern Science: Tensions, Ambiguities, Potential (Turnhout: Brepols, 2019)Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Alston, William P., Perceiving God: The Epistemology of Religious Experience (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991)Google Scholar
Amis, Robin, A Different Christianity: Early Christian Esotericism and Modern Thought (Albany: State University of New York, 1985)Google Scholar
Atmanspacher, Harald, ‘The Pauli-Jung Conjecture and Its Relatives: A Formally Augmented Outline’, Open Philosophy, www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/opphil-2020-0138/htmlGoogle Scholar
Barbour, Ian G., Religion in an Age of Science: The Gifford Lectures 1989–1991, Vol. 1 (London: SCM, 1990)Google Scholar
Barrow, John D., and Tipler, Frank J., The Anthropic Cosmological Principle (Oxford: Clarendon, 1986)Google Scholar
Berger, Peter, A Rumour of Angels: Modern Society and the Rediscovery of the Supernatural (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1969)Google Scholar
Bird, Alexander, and Tobin, Emma, ‘Natural Kinds’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta (2018), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/natural-kinds/Google Scholar
Blowers, Paul, Maximus the Confessor: Jesus Christ and the Transfiguration of the World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016)Google Scholar
Boersma, Hans, ‘Nature and the Supernatural in la nouvelle théologie: The Recovery of a Sacramental Mindset’, New Blackfriars 93 (2012) 34–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Hans, Nouvelle Théologie and Sacramental Ontology: A Return to Mystery (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Bohm, David, Wholeness and the Implicate Order (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1980)Google Scholar
Bradshaw, David, ‘Introduction’, in Natural Theology in the Eastern Orthodox Tradition, ed. Bradshaw, David and Swinburne, Richard (St.Paul, MN: IOTA, 2021) 1–21Google Scholar
Bradshaw, David, ‘The Logoi of Beings in Patristic Thought’, in Toward an Ecology of Transfiguration: Orthodox Christian Perspectives on Environment, Nature, and Creation, ed. Foltz, Bruce and Chryssavgis, John (New York: Fordham University Press, 2013) 9-22Google Scholar
Bradshaw, David, ‘The Mind and the Heart in Christian East and West’, Faith and Philosophy 26 (2009) 576–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, David, and Swinburne, Richard, eds., Natural Theology in the Eastern Orthodox Tradition (St. Paul, MN: IOTA, 2021)Google Scholar
Brent, James, ‘Natural Theology’, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2020), https://iep.utm.edu/theo-nat/#H5Google Scholar
Brown, Warren S., and Strawn, Brad. D., The Physical Nature of Christian Life: Neuroscience, Psychology and the Church (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012)Google Scholar
Ceglie, di, Roberto, ‘Faith, Reason and Charity in Thomas Aquinas’s Thought’, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 79 (2016) 133–46Google Scholar
Chenoweth, Mark, ‘A Maximian Framework for Understanding Evolution’, St Vladimir’s Theological Quarterly 64 (2020) 157–80Google Scholar
Clayton, Philip, ‘Panentheism in Metaphysical and Scientific Perspective’, in In Whom We Live and Move and Have Our Being: Panentheistic Reflections on God’s Presence in a Scientific World, ed. Clayton, Philip and Peacocke, Arthur (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2002) 75–84Google Scholar
Clayton, Philip, and Davies, Paul, eds. The Re-emergence of Emergence: The Emergentist Hypothesis from Science to Religion (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Clayton, Philip, and Peacocke, Arthur, eds., In Whom We Live and Move and Have Our Being: Panentheistic Reflections on God’s Presence in a Scientific World (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2002)Google Scholar
Constantine, Theophanes, The Orthodox Doctrine of the Person, 2nd ed. (Edmonton: Timios Prodromis, 2014)Google Scholar
Conway Morris, Simon, Life’s Solution: Inevitable Humans in a Lonely Universe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Cooper, Adam G., The Body in St. Maximus the Confessor: Holy Flesh, Wholly Deified (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costache, Doru, ‘The Orthodox Doctrine of Creation in the Age of Science’, Journal of Orthodox Christian Studies 2 (2019) 43–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darg, Daniel W., ‘Cosmic If-Statements’, in God and the Scientist: Exploring the Work of John Polkinghorne, ed. Watts, Fraser and Knight, Christopher C. (Farnham, UK: Ashgate, 2012) 93–125Google Scholar
Dawkins, Richard, The Ancestor’s Tale: A Pilgrimage to the Dawn of Life (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 2004)Google Scholar
Dawkins, Richard, The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe without Design (London: Longman, 1986)Google Scholar
Deane-Drummond, Celia E., Creation through Wisdom: Theology and the New Biology (Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 2000)Google Scholar
Dodds, Michael, Unlocking Divine Action: Contemporary Science and Thomas Aquinas (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florovsky, Georges, ‘The Ethos of the Orthodox Church’, Ecumenical Review 12 (1960) 183–98Google Scholar
Flynn, Gabriel, and Murray, Paul D., Resourcement: A Movement for Renewal in Twentieth-Century Catholic Theology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Foltz, Bruce V., The Noetics of Nature: Environmental Philosophy and the Holy Beauty of the Visible (New York: Fordham University Press, 2014)Google Scholar
Goldstein, Sheldon, ‘Bohmian Mechanics’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta (2021), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/qm-bohm/Google Scholar
Harré, Rom, Varieties of Realism: A Rationale for the Natural Sciences (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986)Google Scholar
Harrison, Peter, The Fall of Man and the Foundations of Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007)Google Scholar
Haught, John F., God after Darwin: A Theology of Evolution (Boulder, CO: Westview, 2000)Google Scholar
Henn, W., The Hierarchy of Truths According to Yves Congar. O.P., Gregoriana, Analecta 246 (Rome, Analecta Gregoriana, 1987)Google Scholar
Hesse, M. B., ‘Physics, Philosophy and Myth’, in Physics, Philosophy and Theology: A Common Quest for Understanding, ed. Russell, R. J., Stoeger, W. R., and Coyne, G. V. (Vatican City State: Vatican Observatory, 1988)185–99Google Scholar
Hibbs, Darren, ‘Was Gregory of Nyssa a Berkeleyan Idealist?’, British Journal of Philosophy 13 (2005) 425–35Google Scholar
Hick, John, An Interpretation of Religion: Human Responses to the Transcendent (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989)Google Scholar
Hill, Jonathan, ‘Gregory of Nyssa, Material Substance and Berkeleyan Idealism’, British Journal of Philosophy 17 (2009) 653–83Google Scholar
Huyssteen, J. Wentzel van, ‘Postfoundationalism in Theology and Science’, in Rethinking Theology and Science: Six Models for the Current Dialogue, ed. Gregersen, Niels Henrik and van Huyssteen, J. Wentzel (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1998) 13–49Google Scholar
Knight, Christopher C., ‘“Analytic” Natural Theology: Orthodox or Otherwise?’, St Vladimir’s Theological Quarterly 65 (2021) 57–85Google Scholar
Knight, Christopher C., ‘An Apophatic Approach to God’s “Personal” Nature’, in The Divine Nature: Personal and A-personal Perspectives, ed. Kittle, Simon and Gasser, Georg (London: Routledge, 2022) 195–212Google Scholar
Knight, Christopher C., ‘Astrobiology and Theology: Uneasy Partners?’, in The History and Philosophy of Astrobiology: Perspectives on Extraterrestrial Life and the Human Mind, ed. , David (Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, 2013) 245–56Google Scholar
Knight, Christopher C., ‘Divine Action: A Neo-Byzantine Model’, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 58 (2005) 181–99Google Scholar
Knight, Christopher C., The God of Nature: Incarnation and Contemporary Science (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 2007)Google Scholar
Knight, Christopher C., ‘Natural Theology: Complementary Perspectives from the Science-Theology Dialogue and the Eastern Orthodox Tradition’, Philosophy, Theology and the Sciences 8 (2021) 259–284Google Scholar
Knight, Christopher C., ‘Natural Theology and the Eastern Orthodox Tradition’, in The Oxford Handbook of Natural Theology, ed. Russell Re Manning (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), 213–26Google Scholar
Knight, Christopher C., Science and the Christian Faith: A Guide for the Perplexed (Yonkers, NY: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2020)Google Scholar
Knight, Christopher C., ‘Theistic Naturalism and the Word Made Flesh: Complementary Approaches to the Debate on Panentheism’, in In Whom We Live and Move and Have Our Being: Panentheistic Reflections on God’s Presence in a Scientific World, ed. Clayton, Philip and Peacocke, Arthur (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2002)Google Scholar
Knight, Christopher C., Wrestling with the Divine: Science, Religion, and Revelation (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 2001)Google Scholar
Knight, George T., ‘The Definition of the Supernatural’, Harvard Theological Review 3 (1910) 310–24Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962)Google Scholar
Ladouceur, Paul, ‘Evolution and Genesis 2–3: The Decline and Fall of Adam and Eve’, St Vladimir’s Theological Quarterly 57 (2013)Google Scholar
Martin, Laird, Gregory of Nyssa and the Grasp of Faith: Union, Knowledge and Divine Presence (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Liston, Michael, ‘Scientific Realism and Antirealism’, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (n.d.), https://iep.utm.edu/sci-real/Google Scholar
Lollar, Joshua, To See into the Life of Things: The Contemplation of Nature in Maximus the Confessor and His Predecessors (Turnhout: Brepols, 2013)Google Scholar
Lossky, Vladimir, The Mystical Theology of the Eastern Church (Cambridge: James Clarke, 1957)Google Scholar
Loudovikos, Nikolaos, A Eucharistic Ontology: Maximus the Confessor’s Eschatological Ontology (Brookline, MA: Holy Cross, 2010)Google Scholar
Lucas, J. R. ‘The Temporality of God’, in Quantum Cosmology and the Laws of Nature: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, ed. Russell, Robert John, Murphey, Nancey, and Isham, C. J. (Vatican City State: Vatical Observatory, 1993) 235–46Google Scholar
Manning, Re, Russell, ed., The Oxford Handbook of Natural Theology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar
McGrath, Alister, The Open Secret: A New Vision for Natural Theology (Oxford: Blackwell, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrath, Alister, Thomas F. Torrance: An Intellectual Biography (Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1999)Google Scholar
McInerny, Ralph, Praeambula Fidei: Thomism and the God of the Philosophers (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Messer, Niel, Science in Theology: Encounters Between Science and the Christian Tradition (London: T & T Clark, 2020)Google Scholar
Moore, Andrew, ‘Theological Critiques of Natural Theology’, in The Oxford Handbook of Natural Theology, ed. Manning, Russell Re (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013) 227–44Google Scholar
Moroney, Stephen K., The Noetic Effects of Sin: An Historical and Contemporary Exploration of How Sin Affects Our Thinking (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2000)Google Scholar
Murphy, Nancey, Bodies and Souls, or Spirited Bodies? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006)Google Scholar
Need, Stephen W., ‘Re-reading the Prologue: Incarnation and Creation in John 1: 1–18’, Theology 106 (2003) 397–404Google Scholar
Nellas, Panayiotis, Deification in Christ: The Nature of the Human Person (Crestwood, NY: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Nesteruk, Alexei, The Universe As Communion: Towards a Neo-Patristic Synthesis of Theology and Science (London: T & T Clark, 2008)Google Scholar
Nicolaidis, Efthymios, Science and Eastern Orthodoxy: From the Greek Fathers to the Age of Globalization (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Nicolescu, Basarab, Manifesto of Transdisciplinarity (New York: State University Press of New York, 2002)Google Scholar
Oaley, Francis, ‘Christian Theology and the Newtonian Science: The Rise of the Concept of Laws of Nature’, Church History 30 (1961) 433–57Google Scholar
Oddie, Graham, ‘Truthlikeness’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N. (2016), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/truthlikeness/Google Scholar
Oppy, Graham, ‘Arguments for Atheism’, in The Oxford Handbook of Atheism, ed. Bullivant, Stephen and Ruse, Michael (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013) 53–70Google Scholar
Palmer, G. E. H., Sherrard, Philip, and Ware, Kallistos, eds. The Philokalia, Vol. 1 (London: Faber and Faber, 1979)Google Scholar
Pannenberg, Wolfhart, ‘The Concept of Miracle’, Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 37 (2002) 759–62Google Scholar
Peacocke, Arthur R., ‘God’s Interaction with the World: The Implications of Deterministic “Chaos” and of Interconnected and Interdependent Complexity’, in Chaos and Complexity: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, ed. Russell, Robert John, Murphy, Nancey, and Peacocke, Arthur R. (Vatican City State: Vatican Observatory, 1995) 263–87Google Scholar
Peacocke, Arthur, Intimations of Reality: Critical Realism in Science and Theology (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1984)Google Scholar
Peacocke, Arthur, Paths from Science towards God: The End of All Our Exploring (London: Oneworld, 2001)Google Scholar
Penrose, Roger, The Emperor’s New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and the Laws of Physics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989)Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, John, Beyond Science: The Wider Human Context (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, John, One World : The Interaction of Science and Theology (London: SPCK, 1986)Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, John, ‘The Person, the Soul, and Genetic Engineering’, Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (2004) 593–7Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, John, Reason and Reality: The Relationship Between Science and Theology (London: SPCK, 1991)Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, John, Science and Christian Belief: Theological Reflections of a Bottom-Up Thinker (London: SPCK, 1994)Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, John, Science and Creation: The Search for Understanding (London: SPCK, 1988)Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, John, Scientists As Theologians: A Comparison of the Writings of Ian Barbour, Arthur Peacocke, and John Polkinghorne (London: SPCK, 1996)Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, John C., The Quantum World (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1985)Google Scholar
Quine, W. V., ‘Ontological Relativity’, in Ontological Relativity and Other Essays (New York: Columbia University Press, 1969) 26–68Google Scholar
Ritchie, Sarah Lane, ‘Dancing Around the Causal Joint: Challenging The Theological Turn in Divine Action Theories’, Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 37 (2017) 362–79Google Scholar
Ritchie, Sarah Lane, Divine Action and the Human Mind (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019)Google Scholar
Rose, Seraphim, Genesis, Creation, and Early Man (Platina, CA: St Herman of Alaska Brotherhood, 2000)Google Scholar
Russell, Robert John, ‘Bodily Resurrection, Eschatology, and Scientific Cosmology’, in Resurrection: Theological and Scientific Assessments, ed. Peters, Ted, Russell, Robert John, and Welker, Michael (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2002) 3–30Google Scholar
Saunders, Nicholas, Divine Action and Modern Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002)Google Scholar
Schmemann, Alexander, The Eucharist: Sacrament of the Kingdom (Crestwood, NY: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1987)Google Scholar
Schooping, Joshua, ‘Touching the Mind of God: Patristic Christian Thought on the Nature of Matter’, Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 50 (2015) 583–603Google Scholar
Schwartz, Stephen P., Naming, Necessity, and Natural Kinds (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1973)Google Scholar
Sherrard, Philip, Christianity and Eros: Essays on the Theme of Sexual Love (London: SPCK, 1976)Google Scholar
Sherrard, Philip, Christianity: Lineaments of a Sacred Tradition (Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1998)Google Scholar
Sherrard, Philip, ‘The Sacrament’, in The Orthodox Ethos: Essays in Honour of the Centenary of the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of North and South America, Vol. 1, ed. Philippou, A. J. (Oxford: Holywell Press, 1964)Google Scholar
Silva, Ignacio, ‘Divine Action and Thomism: Why Thomas Aquinas’s Thought Is Attractive Today’, Acta Philosophica 25 (2016) 65–84Google Scholar
Smith, James A. K., ‘Is the Universe Open for Surprise? Pentecostal Ontology and the Spirit of Naturalism’, Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 43 (2008) 879–96Google Scholar
Smith, James A. K., Thinking in Tongues: Pentecostal Contributions to Christian Philosophy (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2010)Google Scholar
Swafford, Andrew Dean, Nature and Grace: A New Approach to Thomistic Resourcement (Cambridge: James Clarke, 2014)Google Scholar
Swinburne, Richard, The Existence of God, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Tanev, Stoyan, Energy in Orthodox Theology and Physics: From Controversy to Encounter (Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2017)Google Scholar
Theokritoff, Elizabeth, ‘Creator and Creation’, in The Cambridge Companion to Orthodox Christian Theology, ed. Mary, B. Cunningham and Theokritoff, Elizabeth (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008)Google Scholar
Thunberg, Lars, Man and the Cosmos: The Vision of Saint Maximus the Confessor (Crestwood, NY: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1985)Google Scholar
Thunberg, Lars, Microcosm and Mediator: The Theological Anthropology of Maximus the Confessor (Chicago, IL: Open Court, 1995)Google Scholar
Till, Howard van, ‘Basil, Augustine, and the Doctrine of Creation’s Functional Integrity’, Science and Christian Belief 8 (1996) 21–38Google Scholar
Torrance, Thomas F., The Christian Frame of Mind (Colorado Springs, CO: Helmers and Howard, 1989)Google Scholar
Torrance, Thomas F., Reality and Scientific Theology (Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press, 1985)Google Scholar
Uleman, James S., ‘Introduction: Becoming Aware of the New Unconscious’, in The New Unconscious, ed. Ran, R. Hassin, Uleman, James S., and Barr, John A (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005) 3–18Google Scholar
Balthasar, Von, Urs, Hans, Cosmic Liturgy: The Universe According to Maximus the Confessor, 3rd ed. (San Francisco, CA: Ignatius, 1993)Google Scholar
Vujisic, Zoran, The Art and Science of Healing the Soul: A Guide to Orthodox Psychotherapy (Saarbrucken: VDM Verlag Dr. Muller, 2010)Google Scholar
Ward, Keith, ‘Bishop Berkeley’s Castle: John Polkinghorne on the Soul’, in God and the Scientist: Exploring the Work of John Polkinghorne, ed. Watts, Fraser and Christopher, C. Knight (Farnham: Ashgate, 2012) 127–37Google Scholar
Ware, Kallistos, Bishop of Diokleia, ‘God Immanent Yet Transcendent: The Divine Energies According to Saint Gregory Palamas’, in In Whom We Live and Move and Have Our Being: Panentheistic Reflections on God’s Presence in a Scientific World, ed. Clayton, Philip and Peacocke, Arthur (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2002) 157–68Google Scholar
Wildman, Wesley, ‘The Divine Action Project, 1988 to 2003’, Theology and Science 2 (2010) 31–75Google Scholar
Wildman, Wesley, ‘Robert John Russell’s Theology of God’s Action’, in God’s Action in the World: Essays in Honour of Robert John Russell, ed. Peters, Ted and Hallanger, Nathan (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006) 147–70Google Scholar
Wiles, Maurice, God’s Action in the World: The Bampton Lectures for 1986 (London: SCM, 1986)Google Scholar
Wilson, Robert A., and Foglia, Lucia, ‘Embodied Cognition’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N. (2017), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/embodied-cognition/Google Scholar
Yannaras, Christos, Postmodern Metaphysics, tr. Norman Russell (Brookline, MA: Holy Cross, 2005)Google Scholar
Yong, Amos, The Spirit of Creation: Modern Science and Divine Action in the Pentecostal-Charismatic Imagination (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2011)Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this Element is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.