Element contents
The Form and Theory of Literary Doodling
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 February 2025
Summary
This Element investigates the phenomenon of literary doodling—the making of playful verbal and visual creations by professional authors while engaged in another activity. The first part focuses on defining the form and structure of doodles, comparing and contrasting them with adjacent genres such as sketches, caricatures, and illustrations. The second part explores the modality of doodling, examining doodles through the lenses of spectrality, liminality, and play. Drawing on a wide range of theories and backed up with numerous close readings, the Element argues that doodles, despite their apparent triviality, provide valuable insights into the creative processes, authorial habits, and finished works of literary doodlers. Ultimately, this study aims to legitimise doodles as worthy of serious critical attention, demonstrating how they trouble the meaning of texts, introduce semantic flexibility into literary works and their reception, and rejuvenate the joy of readerly discovery.
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781009492416Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 20 March 2025
References
Allen, Graham. 2021. ‘Shelley as Visual Artist: Doodles, Sketches, Ink Blots, and the Critical Reception of the Visual’. Studies in Romanticism 60, no. 3 (Fall): 277–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allingham, Philip V. 2012. ‘“Reading the Pictures, Visualizing the Text”: Illustrations in Dickens from Pickwick to the Household Edition, 1836 to 1870, Phiz to Fred Barnard’. In Reading Victorian Illustration, 1855–1875: Spoils of the Lumber Room. Edited by Goldman, Paul and Cooke, Simon, 159–78. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Andrade, Jackie. 2010. ‘What Does Doodling Do?’ Applied Cognitive Psychology 24, no. 1: 100–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arundel, Russell M. 1937. Everybody’s Pixillated: A Book of Doodles. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1984. Rabelais and His World. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Bambach, Carmen C. 1999. Drawing and Painting in the Italian Renaissance Workshop: Theory and Practice, 1300–1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barsht, Konstantin. 2016. The Drawings and Calligraphy of Fyodor Dostoevsky: From Image to Word. Translated by Stephen Charles Frauzel. Bergamo: Lemma.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. 1977. Image, Music, Text. Translated by Stephen Heath. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Battles, Matthew. 2004. ‘In Praise of Doodling’. The American Scholar 73, no. 4: 105–8.Google Scholar
Beerbohm, Max 1928. ‘The Spirit of Caricature’. In A Variety of Things, 205–17. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Beerbohm, Max 1964. Letters to Reggie Turner. Edited by Hart-Davis, Rupert. London: Rupert Hart-Davis.Google Scholar
Briggs, Asa. 1998. ‘Victorian Images of Gladstone’. In Gladstone. Edited by Peter, J. Jagger, 33–49. London: Hambledon.Google Scholar
Brown, Sunni. 2014. The Doodle Revolution: Unlock the Power to Think Differently. New York: Portfolio/Penguin.Google Scholar
Bushell, Sally. 2009. Text as Process: Creative Composition in Wordsworth, Tennyson, and Dickinson. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Camille, Michael. 1992. Image on the Edge: The Margins of Medieval Art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Capra, Frank, director. 1936. Mr. Deeds Goes to Town. Columbia Pictures. 1 hr, 55 min. www.amazon.com/dp/B00RNV536K.Google Scholar
Capra, Fritjof. 2013. Learning from Leonardo: Decoding the Notebooks of a Genius. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
Carrier, David. 2000. The Aesthetics of Comics. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Chesterton, G. K. (1935) 2012. ‘The Victorian Debaters on Darwinism’. In The Illustrated London News, 1935–1936. Edited by Lawrence, J. Clipper, 28–32. Vol. 37 of The Collected Works of G. K. Chesterton. Edited by Marlin, George J., Rabatin, Richard P., and John, L. Swan. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. (1817) 2000. Biographia Literaria. In Samuel Taylor Coleridge: The Major Works. Edited by Jackson, H. J., 155–482. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Culotta, Alexis. 2021. ‘Preparatory Drawing During the Italian Renaissance, an Introduction’. Smarthistory. https://smarthistory.org/italian-renaissance-drawing.Google Scholar
Davis, Oliver. ‘The Author at Work in Genetic Criticism’. Paragraph 25, no. 1 (March 2002): 92–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davison, Sarah. 2011. ‘Max Beerbohm’s Altered Books’. Textual Cultures 6, no. 1 (Spring): 48–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. 2004. Desert Islands and Other Texts, 1953–1974. Translated by Michael Taormina. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1976. Of Grammatology. Translated by Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques 1981. Dissemination. Translated by Barbara Johnson. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques 1988. ‘Signature Event Context’. In Limited Inc. Translated by Samuel Weber and Mehlman, Jeffrey, 1–23. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques 2001. Writing and Difference, 2nd ed. Translated by Alan Bass. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques 2002. ‘Spectrographies’. In Echographies of Television, by Jacques Derrida and Bernard Stiegler. Translated by Jennifer Bajorek, 113–34. Oxford: Polity.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. (1848) 1974. Dombey and Son. Edited by Horsman, Alan. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles 1977. The British Academy/The Pilgrim Edition of the Letters of Charles Dickens, Vol. 4, 1844–1846. Edited by Tillotson, Kathleen Mary. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, Emily. 1960. The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson. Edited by Thomas, H. Johnson. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Dickson, Polly. 2022. ‘Hoffmann’s Signature Doodles’. Literatur für Leser 45, no. 1–2: 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doherty, M. Stephen. 2005. ‘Serious Doodles’. American Artist 69, no. 754 (May): 28–31.Google Scholar
Doran, Amanda-Jane. 2004. ‘Landells, Ebenezer (1808–1860)’. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography online. https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/15971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felski, Rita. 2015. The Limits of Critique. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fennell, C. A. M., ed. 1892. The Stanford Dictionary of Anglicised Words and Phrases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ferlazzo, Paul J. 2007. Review of The Notebooks of Robert Frost. Choice 44, no. 12 (August): 2106.Google Scholar
Freud, Ernst, Freud, Lucie, and Grubrich-Simitis, Ilse. 1978. Sigmund Freud: His Life in Pictures and Words. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1960. Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious. Translated by James Strachey. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Frye, Northrup. 1990. Anatomy of Criticism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 2004. Truth and Method, 2nd ed. Translated by Weinsheimer, Joel and Marshall, Donald G.. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Gennep, Arnold Van. 1960. The Rites of Passage. Translated by Monika B. Vizedom and Gabrielle L. Caffee. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gilchrist, Alexander. 1880. Life of William Blake, vol. I. London: MacMillan and Company.Google Scholar
Gilpin, William. 1792. Three Essays: On Picturesque Beauty; On Picturesque Travel; And On Sketching Landscape. London: Printed for R. Blamire.Google Scholar
Golden, Catherine. 2017. Serials to Graphic Novels: The Evolution of the Victorian Illustrated Book. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
Goldman, Paul. 2012. ‘Defining Illustration Studies: Towards a New Academic Discipline’. In Reading Victorian Illustration, 1855–1875: Spoils of the Lumber Room. Edited by Goldman, Paul and Cooke, Simon, 13–32. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Goldman, Paul, and Cooke, Simon, eds. 2012. Reading Victorian Illustration, 1855–1875: Spoils of the Lumber Room. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Gombrich, E. H. 1991. Introduction: ‘Caccia allo Scarabocchio’. In Zevola, Piaceri di Noia, 7–18.Google Scholar
Gombrich, E. H. 1999. The Uses of Images: Studies in the Social Function of Art and Visual Communication. London: Phaidon.Google Scholar
Goslee, Nancy Moore. 1985. ‘Shelley at Play: A Study of Sketch and Text in His “Prometheus” Notebooks’. Huntington Library Quarterly 48, no. 3 (Summer): 211–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goslee, Nancy Moore 2011. Shelley’s Visual Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, Sharat. 2016. ‘Doodling: The Artistry of the Roving Metaphysical Mind’. Journal of Mental Health and Human Behaviour 21, no. 1 (January–June): 16–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, N. John. 1985. Introduction to The Illustrated Zuleika Dobson, Or, An Oxford Love Story, by Max Beerbohm. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hanks, Patrick. 2015. ‘Definition’. In The Oxford Handbook of Lexicography. Edited by Durkin, Philip, 94–122. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, Robert C. 2009. ‘How Comics Came to Be: Through the Juncture of Word and Image from Magazine Gag Cartoons to Newspaper Strips, Tools for Critical Appreciation plus Rare Seldom Witnessed Historical Facts’. In A Comics Studies Reader. Edited by Heer, Jeet and Worcester, Kent, 26–45. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.Google Scholar
Haywood, Ian. 2013. Romanticism and Caricature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry Sotheran Ltd. 1879. Sotheran’s Price Current of Literature, no. 177 (28 February): 4. https://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015076073827.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, E. T. A. 2004. ‘The Artushof’. Translated by R. J. Hollingdale. In Tales of Hoffmann, selected by R. J. Hollingdale. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Hughes, Daniel. 1970. ‘Shelley, Leonardo, and the Monsters of Thought’. Criticism 12, no. 3 (Summer): 195–212.Google Scholar
Huizinga, Johan. (1944) 2007. Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hunt, Leigh. 1832. Preface to The Masque of Anarchy: A Poem, by Percy Bysshe Shelley, xiv–xv. London: Moxon.Google Scholar
Huxley, Aldous. 1955. ‘Doodles in the Dictionary’. Esquire 44, no. 3 (September): 44–45, 135–36.Google Scholar
Jenny, Laurent. 1996. ‘Genetic Criticism and Its Myths’. Translated by Richard Watts. Yale French Studies 89 (Drafts): 9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, C. G. 1976. ‘The Relations between the Ego and the Unconscious’. In The Portable Jung. Edited by Campbell, Joseph, translated by R. F. C. Hull, 70–138. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Kooistra, Lorraine Janzen. 1995. The Artist as Critic: Bitextuality in Fin-de-Siècle Illustrated Books. Aldershot: Scholar Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1982. Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lauster, Martina. 2007. Sketches of the Nineteenth Century: European Journalism and Its Physiologies, 1830–50. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Lecercle, Jean-Jacques. 1994. Philosophy of Nonsense: The Intuitions of Victorian Nonsense Literature. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maclagan, David. 2014. Line Let Loose: Scribbling, Doodling and Automatic Drawing. London: Reaktion.Google Scholar
Marangoni, Kristen. 2013. ‘Marginalized Modernisms: Doodling and Textual Production in the Works of Dylan Thomas, Samuel Beckett, and Stevie Smith’. PhD diss., University of Tulsa.Google Scholar
May, William. 2010. Stevie Smith and Authorship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercurio, Jeremiah Romano. 2011. ‘Faithful Infidelity: Charles Ricketts’s Illustrations for Two of Oscar Wilde’s Poems in Prose’. Victorian Network 3, No. 1 (Special Bulletin): 3–21. https://doi.org/10.5283/vn.17.Google Scholar
Mercurio, Jeremiah Romano, and Gabelman, . 2019. ‘Literary Doodling in the Long Nineteenth Century: The Examples of E. Cotton, G. K. Chesterton, and Max Beerbohm’. Quærendo 49, no. 1 (March): 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wim Van, Mierlo. 2013. ‘The Archaeology of the Manuscript: Towards Modern Palaeography’. In The Boundaries of the Literary Archive: Reclamation and Representation. Edited by Smith, Carrie and Stead, Lisa, 15–29. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Morris, Charles. 1971. Writings on the General Theory of Signs. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nancy, Jean-Luc. 2013. The Pleasure in Drawing. Translated by Philip Armstrong. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Oddie, William. 2008. Chesterton and the Romance of Orthodoxy: The Making of GKC, 1874–1908. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pickering, Robert. 1997. ‘Word, Pictorial Image and the Genesis of Writing in Paul Valéry’s Cahiers’. Word & Image 13, no. 2 (April–June): 158–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prescott-Steed, David. 2010. ‘Doodle Culture: Meditations on the Great Idle Scrawl’. Reconstruction: Studies in Contemporary Culture 10, no. 2. http://reconstruction.digitalodu.com/Issues/102/recon_102_prescott-steed01.shtml.Google Scholar
Reid, Martine. 1994. ‘Editor’s Preface: Legible/Visible’. Yale French Studies 84 (Boundaries: Writing & Drawing): 1–12.Google Scholar
Riquelme, Jean Paul. 2013. ‘Oscar Wilde’s Anadoodlegram: A Genetic, Performative Reading of An Ideal Husband’. In Wilde Discoveries: Traditions, Histories, Archives. Edited by Bristow, Joseph, 289–314. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Neville. 1967. Shelley at Work: A Critical Inquiry, 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Sha, Richard C. 1998. The Visual and Verbal Sketch in British Romanticism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Stevie. 1974. ‘Much Further Out Than You Thought’, interview by Jonathan Williams. Parnassus: Poetry in Review 2, no. 2 (Spring/Summer): 125–27.Google Scholar
Spacks, Patricia Meyer. 1995. Boredom: The Literary History of a State of Mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stillinger, Jack. 1994. Coleridge and Textual Instability: The Multiple Versions of the Major Poems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Henry L. 1899. Henry George Liddell: D.D., Dean of Christ Church, Oxford. A Memoir. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan. 1990. Genres in Discourse. Translated by Catherine Porter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Töpffer, Rodolphe. (1845) 1965. ‘Essay on Physiognomy’. In Enter the Comics. Edited and translated by Ellen Wiese, 1–36. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor W. 1977. The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-structure. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. First published 1969 by Aldine Publishing (Chicago, IL).Google Scholar
Turner, Victor W. 1979. ‘Betwixt and Between: The Liminal Period in Rites de Passage’. In Reader in Comparative Religion, 4th ed. Edited by Lessa, W. A., 234–43. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Viscusi, Robert. 1979. ‘A Dandy’s Diary: The Manuscripts of Max Beerbohm’s Zuleika Dobson’. The Princeton University Library Chronicle 40, no. 3: 234–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Brian. 2022. ‘Substance and Shadow: The Art of the Cartoon’. In Comic Art in Museums. Edited by Munson, K. A., 23–32. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.Google Scholar
Watts, Michael. 2000. Doodle Interpretation: A Beginner’s Guide. Abingdon: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
Wilde, Oscar. 2000. The Complete Works of Oscar Wilde, Vol. 1: Poems and Poems in Prose. Edited by Fong, Bobby and Beckson, Karl. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. (1921) 2023. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Translated by Michael Beaney. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Thomas. 1875. A History of Caricature and Grotesque in Literature and Art. London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar
Zevola, Giuseppe. 1993. Piaceri di Noia: Quattro Secoli di Scarabocchi nell’Archivio Storico del Banco di Napoli. Milan: Leonardo.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this Element is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.