Element contents
Series: Elements in Gender and Politics
Gender and Local Political Ambition
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 September 2026
Summary
The Element advances our understanding of women's representation by focusing on local office, where women might be expected to express greater interest and face fewer disadvantages. Using an original survey of civically and politically engaged people, the authors find that the ambition gender gap extends to local office, including elected and appointed positions. Ambitious women are also more likely to seek only local office. Men express high levels of ambition in nearly every circumstance, but women do so only under ideal conditions. Women's engagement in their communities and in politics is driven by communal rather than agentic goals, which affects the types and levels of office they seek. Women's lower levels of perceived qualification and recruitment help explain the ambition gender gap at the local level. A more equitable political opportunity structure and an understanding of politics as an arena for problem-solving, rather than power-seeking, could help address women's underrepresentation.
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in Gender and PoliticsOnline ISBN: 9781009753326Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 03 December 2026
References
Aldrich, John H., and Thomsen, Danielle M.. 2017. “Party, Policy, and the Ambition to Run for Higher Office.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 42 (2): 321–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ammassari, Sofia, McDonnell, Duncan, and Valbruzzi, Marco. 2023. “It’s about the Type of Career: The Political Ambition Gender Gap among Youth Wing Members.” European Journal of Political Research 62 (4): 1054–77.10.1111/1475-6765.12560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anzia, Sarah F. 2011. “Election Timing and the Electoral Influence of Interest Groups.” The Journal of Politics 73 (2): 412–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anzia, Sarah F., and Berry, Christopher R.. 2011. “The Jackie (and Jill) Robinson Effect: Why Do Congresswomen Outperform Congressman?” American Journal of Political Science 55 (3): 478–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anzia, Sarah F., and Bernhard, Rachel. 2022. “Gender Stereotyping and the Electoral Success of Women Candidates: New Evidence from Local Elections in the United States.” British Journal of Political Science 52 (4): 1544–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armaly, Miles T., and Enders, Adam M.. 2024. “Who Supports Political Violence?” Perspectives on Politics 22 (2): 427–44.10.1017/S1537592722001086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkeson, Lonna Rae, and Carrillo, Nancy. 2007. “More Is Better: The Influence of Collective Female Descriptive Representation on External Efficacy.” Politics & Gender 3 (1): 79–101.Google Scholar
Barnes, Tiffany D. 2016. Gendering Legislative Behavior: Institutional Constraints and Collaboration in Argentina. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Tiffany D., Beall, Victoria, and Holman, Mirya R.. 2021. “Pink Collar Representation and Policy Outcomes in U.S. States.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 46 (1): 119–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Tiffany D., and Holman, Mirya R.. 2026. “Lawyers, Career Goals, and the Gender Gap in Political Ambition.” Journal of Law and Courts 14 (1): 171–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Nichole M. 2018. “Untangling the Relationship between Partisanship, Gender Stereotypes, and Support for Female Candidates.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 39 (1): 1–25.10.1080/1554477X.2016.1268875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Nichole M. 2020a. “Running Local: Gender Stereotyping and Female Candidates in Local Elections.” Urban Affairs Review 56 (1): 96–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Nichole M. 2020b. “Shifting Standards: How Voters Evaluate the Qualifications of Female and Male Candidates.” The Journal of Politics 82 (1): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Nichole M. 2020c. The Qualifications Gap: Why Women Must Be Better Than Men to Win Political Office. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108864503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benedictis-Kessner, Justin de, Lee, Diana Da In, Velez, Yamil R., and Warshaw, Christopher. 2023. “American Local Government Elections Database.” Scientific Data 10 (1): 1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bergstrand, Kelly, Shelton, Beth Anne, and Deen, Rebecca E.. 2024. “The Inspired and the Discouraged: School Board Service and Differential Effects on Political Ambition.” PLOS ONE 19 (12): e0311054.10.1371/journal.pone.0311054CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernhard, Rachel, Shames, Shauna, and Langan Teele, Dawn. 2021. “To Emerge? Breadwinning, Motherhood, and Women’s Decisions to Run for Office.” American Political Science Review 115 (2): 379–94.10.1017/S0003055420000970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhard, Rachel, and Holman, Mirya R.. 2025. Gendered Jobs and Local Leadership. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonica, Adam. 2020. “Why Are There So Many Lawyers in Congress?” Legislative Studies Quarterly 45: 253–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bos, Angela L., Greenlee, Jill S., Holman, Mirya R., Oxley, Zoe M., and Celeste Lay, J.. 2022. “This One’s for the Boys: How Gendered Political Socialization Limits Girls’ Political Ambition and Interest.” American Political Science Review 116 (2): 484–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Nadia E. 2014. “Political Participation of Women of Color: An Intersectional Analysis.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 35 (4): 315–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, Nancy, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Verba, Sidney. 1997. “The Public Consequences of Private Inequality: Family Life and Citizen Participation.” American Political Science Review 91 (2): 373–89.10.2307/2952362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, Nancy, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Verba, Sidney. 2001. The Private Roots of Public Action: Gender, Equality, and Political Participation. Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674029088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Daniel M., and Preece, Jessica Robinson. 2016. “Recruitment and Perceptions of Gender Bias in Party Leader Support.” Political Research Quarterly 69 (4): 842–51.10.1177/1065912916668412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, David E., and Wolbrecht, Christina. 2006. “See Jane Run: Women Politicians as Role Models for Adolescents.” The Journal of Politics 68 (2): 233–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, David E., and Wolbrecht, Christina. 2025. See Jane Run: How Women Politicians Matter for Young People. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cargile, Ivy A. M. 2015. “Latina Issues: An Analysis of the Policy Issue Competencies of Latina Candidates.” In Distinct Identities: Minority Women in U.S. Politics, edited by Gershon, Sarah A. and Brown, Nadia E.. Routledge.Google Scholar
Cargile, Ivy A. M. 2023. “Stereotyping Latinas: Candidate Gender and Ethnicity on the Political Stage.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 11 (2): 207–25.10.1080/21565503.2021.1946097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassese, Erin C., and Holman, Mirya R.. 2018. “Party and Gender Stereotypes in Campaign Attacks.” Political Behavior 40 (3): 785–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CAWP. 2023. “Women in Elective Office 2023.” https://cawp.rutgers.edu/facts/current-numbers/women-elective-office-2023.Google Scholar
Chan, Nathan K., and Magni, Gabriele. 2025. “The Group-Basis of Political Behaviour among Minoritized Communities: The Case of LGBTQ+ Linked Fate and Sexual and Gender Minorities.” British Journal of Political Science 55 (January): e30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, Amanda, O’Brien, Diana Z., and Piscopo, Jennifer M.. 2019. “All Male Panels? Representation and Democratic Legitimacy.” American Journal of Political Science 63 (1): 113–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, Amanda, O’Brien, Diana Z., and Piscopo, Jennifer M.. 2023. “Women Grab Back: Exclusion, Policy Threat, and Women’s Political Ambition.” American Political Science Review 117 (4): 1465–85.10.1017/S0003055422001344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffé, Hilde, and Bolzendahl, Catherine. 2010. “Same Game, Different Rules? Gender Differences in Political Participation.” Sex Roles 62: 318–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, Cathy, Jones, Kathleen B., and Tronto, Joan C.. 1997. Women Transforming Politics: An Alternative Reader. New York University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Philip N. 2004. “The Gender Division of Labor: ‘Keeping House’ and Occupational Segregation in the United States.” Gender & Society 18 (2): 239–52.10.1177/0891243203262037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conroy, Meredith, and Green, Jon. 2020. “It Takes a Motive: Communal and Agentic Articulated Interest and Candidate Emergence.” Political Research Quarterly 73 (4): 942–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costantini, Edmond. 1990. “Political Women and Political Ambition: Closing the Gender Gap.” American Journal of Political Science 34 (3): 741–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cravens, Royal G., III. 2021. “The Tipping Point: Examining the Effects of Heterosexist and Racist Stigma on Political Participation.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 28 (4): 1185–1212.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberlé Williams. 1991. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review 43 (6): 1241–99.10.2307/1229039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowder-Meyer, Melody. 2013. “Gendered Recruitment without Trying: How Local Party Recruiters Affect Women’s Representation.” Politics & Gender 9 (4): 390–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowder-Meyer, Melody, and Lauderdale, Benjamin E.. 2014. “A Partisan Gap in the Supply of Female Potential Candidates in the United States.” Research & Politics 1 (1): 2053168014537230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowder-Meyer, Melody, Gadarian, Shana Kushner, and Trounstine, Jessica. 2015. “Electoral Institutions, Gender Stereotypes, and Women’s Local Representation.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 3 (2): 318–34.10.1080/21565503.2015.1031803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowder-Meyer, Melody. 2020. “Baker, Bus Driver, Babysitter, Candidate? Revealing the Gendered Development of Political Ambition Among Ordinary Americans.” Political Behavior 42 (2): 359–384.10.1007/s11109-018-9498-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D Magazine. 2018. “People with Felony Convictions to Now Be Allowed on City Boards, Commissions.” D Magazine, February 28. www.dmagazine.com/frontburner/2018/02/dallas-city-council-boards-commissions-felony-convictions/.Google Scholar
Daily Detroit. 2025. Mary Sheffield Wants to Be Mayor of Detroit www.youtube.com/watch?v=9y8x0LzdarY.Google Scholar
Dawson, Michael C. 2001. Black Visions: The Roots of Contemporary African-American Political Ideologies. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Deason, Grace, Greenlee, Jill S., and Langner, Carrie A.. 2015. “Mothers on the Campaign Trail: Implications of Politicized Motherhood for Women in Politics.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 3 (1): 133–48.10.1080/21565503.2014.992792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deckman, Melissa Marie. 2007. “School Board Candidates and Gender: Ideology, Party, and Policy Concerns.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 28 (1): 87–117.Google Scholar
Deckman, Melissa Marie. 2024. The Politics of Gen Z: How the Youngest Voters Will Shape Our Democracy. Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Detroit Mayor’s Office. 2026. “Mayor Mary Sheffield Declares Detroit Will Be Largest City in the Nation to Participate in Rx Kids.” City of Detroit, January 5. https://detroitmi.gov/news/mayor-mary-sheffield-declares-detroit-will-be-largest-city-nation-participate-rx-kids.Google Scholar
Dittmar, Kelly. 2015. Navigating Gendered Terrain: Stereotypes and Strategy in Political Campaigns. Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Dittmar, Kelly, Sanbonmatsu, Kira, and Carroll, Susan J.. 2018. A Seat at the Table: Congresswomen’s Perspectives on Why Their Presence Matters. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dittmar, Kelly. 2020. “Urgency and Ambition: The Influence of Political Environment and Emotion in Spurring US Women’s Candidacies in 2018.” European Journal of Politics and Gender 3 (1): 143–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dougherty, George W., and Easton, Jennifer. 2011. “Appointed Public Volunteer Boards: Exploring the Basics of Citizen Participation Through Boards and Commissions.” The American Review of Public Administration 41 (5): 519–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dovi, Suzanne. 2025. “On Political Misogyny.” American Political Science Review 119 (2): 1054–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowe, Pearl K. Ford. 2020. “Resisting Marginalization: Black Women’s Political Ambition and Agency.” PS: Political Science & Politics 53 (4): 697–702.Google Scholar
Dowe, Pearl K. Ford. 2023. “The Community Matters: Finding the Source of the Radical Imagination of Black Women’s Political Ambition.” In Women of Color Political Elites in the US, edited by Brown, Nadia E., Clark, Christopher J., and Mahoney, Anna Mitchell, Routledge: 263–278.Google Scholar
Dynes, Adam M., Hassell, Hans J. G., Miles, Matthew R., and Robinson Preece, Jessica. 2021. “Personality and Gendered Selection Processes in the Political Pipeline.” Politics & Gender 17 (1): 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eady, Gregory, and Rasmussen, Anne. 2025. “Gendered Perceptions and the Costs of Political Toxicity: Experimental Evidence from Politicians and Citizens in Four Democracies.” American Political Science Review 119 (3): 1446–62.10.1017/S0003055424001205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, Alice H., Wood, Wendy, and Diekman, Amanda B.. 2000. “Social Role Theory of Sex Differences and Similarities: A Current Appraisal.” In The Developmental Social Psychology of Gender, edited by Eckes, Thomas and Trautner, Hanns Martin. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Edlin, Ruby. 2025. Political Intimidation Threatens Diversity in State and Local Office. Brennan Center for Justice. www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/political-intimidation-threatens-diversity-state-and-local-office.Google Scholar
Einstein, Katherine Levine, Glick, David M., and Palmer, Maxwell. 2019. Neighborhood Defenders: Participatory Politics and America’s Housing Crisis. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einstein, Katherine Levine, Glick, David M., Palmer, Maxwell, and Pressel, Robert J.. 2020. “Do Mayors Run for Higher Office? New Evidence on Progressive Ambition.” American Politics Research 48 (1): 197–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farris, Emily M., and Holman, Mirya R.. 2014. “Social Capital and Solving the Puzzle of Black Women’s Political Participation.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 3 (2): 331–49.Google Scholar
Farris, Emily M., and Holman, Mirya R.. 2023. “Sheriffs, Right-Wing Extremism, and the Limits of U.S. Federalism during a Crisis.” Social Science Quarterly 104 (2): 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, Michael, and Ihrke, Douglas. 2020. “Uncontested: Electoral Competition in American School Board Elections.” Journal of Educational Administration (Armidale) 58 (6): 661–75.Google Scholar
FOX 8 Staff. 2024. “New Orleans Councilwoman Helena Moreno Announces Mayoral Run.” News. www.Fox8live.Com, December 11. www.fox8live.com/2024/12/11/new-orleans-councilwoman-helena-moreno-announces-mayoral-run/.Google Scholar
Fox, Richard L., and Lawless, Jennifer L.. 2005. “To Run or Not to Run for Office: Explaining Nascent Political Ambition.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (3): 642–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Richard L. 2010. “Congressional Elections: Women’s Candidacies and the Road to Gender Parity.” In Gender and Elections: Shaping the Future of American Politics, 2nd ed., edited by Carroll, Susan J. and Fox, Richard L.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fox, Richard L., and Lawless, Jennifer L.. 2010. “If Only They’d Ask: Gender, Recruitment, and Political Ambition.” The Journal of Politics 72 (02): 310–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franceschet, Susan, and Piscopo, Jennifer M.. 2014. “Sustaining Gendered Practices? Power, Parties, and Elite Political Networks in Argentina.” Comparative Political Studies 47 (1): 85–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freiburger, Tina L., and Sheeran, Alyssa M.. 2020. “The Joint Effects of Race, Ethnicity, Gender, and Age on the Incarceration and Sentence Length Decisions.” Race and Justice 10 (2): 203–22.10.1177/2153368717739676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulton, Sarah A., Maestas, Cherie D., Sandy Maisel, L., and Stone, Walter J.. 2006. “The Sense of a Woman: Gender, Ambition, and the Decision to Run for Congress.” Political Research Quarterly 59 (2): 235–48.10.1177/106591290605900206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funk, Kendall D., and Philips, Andrew Q.. 2019. “Representative Budgeting: Women Mayors and the Composition of Spending in Local Governments.” Political Research Quarterly 72 (1): 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallup. 2025. “LGBTQ+ Identification in U.S. Rises to 9.3%.” https://news.gallup.com/poll/656708/lgbtq-identification-rises.aspxGoogle Scholar
Gershon, Sarah Allen, Montoya, Celeste, Bejarano, Christina, and Brown, Nadia. 2019. “Intersectional Linked Fate and Political Representation.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 7 (3): 642–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gertzog, Irwin N. 2004. Women and Power on Capitol Hill: Reconstructing the Congressional Women’s Caucus. Lynne Rienner Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GOLDC. 2026. “Candidate Answers to JOLDC: Danielle Herbert-Guggenheim for City Council District 11.” Jim Owles Liberal Democratic Club, April 27. https://jimowles.org/news/candidate-answers-to-joldc-danielle-herbert-guggenheim-for-city-council-district-11-2025.Google Scholar
Green, Jon, Conroy, Meredith, and Hammond, Ciera. 2024. “Something to Run for: Stated Motives as Indicators of Candidate Emergence.” Political Behavior 46 (2): 1281–1301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, John D., Newman, Brian, and Wolbrecht, Christina. 2012. “A Gender Gap in Policy Representation in the U.S. Congress?” Legislative Studies Quarterly 37 (1): 35–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Håkansson, Sandra. 2024a. “Explaining Citizen Hostility against Women Political Leaders: A Survey Experiment in the United States and Sweden.” Politics & Gender 20 (1): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Håkansson, Sandra. 2024b. “The Gendered Representational Costs of Violence against Politicians.” Perspectives on Politics 22 (1): 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Matthew E. K., and Campbell, David E.. 2025. Notre Dame Health of Democracy Survey. Notre Dame, IN: Rooney Democracy Institute. Available from https://rooneyinstitute.nd.edu/research/health-of-democracy-survey/Google Scholar
Hancock, Ange-Marie. 2007. “Intersectionality as a Normative and Empirical Paradigm.” Politics & Gender 3 (2): 248–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Allison P., Walker, Hannah L., and Eckhouse, Laurel. 2020. “No Justice, No Peace: Political Science Perspectives on the American Carceral State.” Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics 5 (3): 427–49.10.1017/rep.2020.21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartney, Michael T., and Hayes, Sam D.. 2021. “Off-Cycle and Out of Sync: How Election Timing Influences Political Representation.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 21 (4): 335–54.10.1017/spq.2020.6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassell, Hans J. G., Hollibaugh, Gary E., and Miles, Matthew R.. 2025. “Does the Presence or Absence of Elections Remove Gender Differences in Ambition for Public Service?” British Journal of Political Science 55 (January): e6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helena Moreno for Mayor. 2025. “Meet Helena Moreno.” https://helenamorenola.com/meet-helena.Google Scholar
Helgøy, Anna, and Weeks, Ana Catalano. 2025. “Crowded Out: The Influence of Mental Load Priming on Intentions to Participate in Public Life.” British Journal of Political Science 55: e29.10.1017/S0007123424000826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrick, Rebekah, Thomas, Sue, Franklin, Lori, Godwin, Marcia L., Gnabasik, Eveline, and Reith Schroedel, Jean. 2021. “Physical Violence and Psychological Abuse against Female and Male Mayors in the United States.” Politics, Groups & Identities 9 (4): 681–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrick, Rebekah, and Thomas, Sue. 2022. “Not Just Sticks and Stones: Psychological Abuse and Physical Violence among U.S. State Senators.” Politics & Gender 18 (2): 422–47.10.1017/S1743923X2000063XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbs, Leah. 2025. “‘More Visible and Vulnerable to Attacks’ – Violence Against (Local) Women Politicians and the Local Costs of Doing Politics.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 46 (4): 320–38.10.1080/1554477X.2025.2572265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
High-Pippert, Angela, and Comer, John. 1998. “Female Empowerment.” Women & Politics 19 (4): 53–66.10.1300/J014v19n04_03CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinojosa, Magda, and Kittilson, Miki Caul. 2020. Seeing Women, Strengthening Democracy: How Women in Politics Foster Connected Citizens. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoang, Bai Linh, and Benjamin, Andrea. 2024. “‘Defund’ or ‘Refund’ the Police?: City Council Responsiveness to the Black Lives Matter Protests.” Urban Affairs Review 60 (1): 387–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höhmann, Daniel, Latteier, Tomoko, and Bailer, Stefanie. 2025. “An Early Leak in the Pipeline – Online Abuse as a Barrier for Young Women’s Political Engagement.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 46 (4): 300–19.10.1080/1554477X.2025.2552573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holman, Mirya R. 2015. Women in Politics in the American City. Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Holman, Mirya R. 2016. “The Differential Effect of Resources on Political Participation across Gender and Racial Groups.” In Distinct Identities: Minority Women in U.S. Politics, edited by Brown, Nadia E. and Gershon, Sarah A.. Routledge.Google Scholar
Holman, Mirya R., and Schneider, Monica C.. 2018. “Gender, Race, and Political Ambition.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 6 (2): 264–80.10.1080/21565503.2016.1208105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holman, Mirya R., Podrazik, Erica, and Mohamed, Heather Silber. 2020. “Choosing Choice: How Gender and Religiosity Shape Abortion Attitudes among Latinos.” Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics 5 (2): 384–411.10.1017/rep.2019.51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holman, Mirya R., Mahoney, Anna Mitchell, and Hurler, Emma. 2022. “Let’s Work Together: Bill Success via Women’s Cosponsorship in U.S. State Legislatures.” Political Research Quarterly 75 (3): 676–90.10.1177/10659129211020123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holman, Mirya R. 2023. “Gender Stereotyping Questions Accurately Measure Beliefs About the Traits and Issue Strengths of Women and Men in Politics.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 44 (1): 90–104.10.1080/1554477X.2023.2162285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holman, Mirya R., and Mahoney, Anna Mitchell. 2023. “Take (Her) to the Limit: Term Limits Do Not Diminish Women’s Overperformance in Legislative Office.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 48 (3): 681–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holman, Mirya R., and Kalmoe, Nathan P.. 2024. “Partisanship in the #MeToo Era.” Perspectives on Politics 22 (1): 44–61.10.1017/S1537592721001912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holman, Mirya R. 2025. The Hidden Face of Local Power: Appointed Boards and the Limits of Democracy. Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Holman, Mirya R., and Simko, Tyler. 2025. “Tabling Debate: How Local Officials Try to Use Agenda Control to Stifle Conflict.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 50 (4): n/a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holman, Mirya R., Iyer, Lakshmi, and Wolbrecht, Christina. 2025. “Tapping into Power: Women’s Appointments to Boards and Commission.” Working Paper.Google Scholar
Howard, Andrew. 2026. “Election Officials Grapple with a Brain Drain as Threats Rise.” Politico, February 3. www.politico.com/news/2026/02/03/election-officials-threat-midterms-00761210.Google Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, and Terkildsen, Nayda. 1993. “The Consequences of Gender Stereotypes for Women Candidates at Different Levels and Types of Office.” Political Research Quarterly 46 (3): 503–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Junqueira, Andrea, O’Brien, Diana Z., Hayes, Matthew, Jeong, Jongwoo, Crisp, Brian, and Gabel, Matthew. 2025. “Race, Gender, and Nascent Political Ambition.” British Journal of Political Science 55: e177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalmoe, Nathan P., and Mason, Lilliana. 2022. Radical American Partisanship: Mapping Violent Hostility, Its Causes, and the Consequences for Democracy. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanthak, Kristin, and Woon, Jonathan. 2015. “Women Don’t Run? Election Aversion and Candidate Entry.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (3): 595–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpowitz, Christopher F., Quin Monson, J., and Robinson Preece, Jessica. 2017. “How to Elect More Women: Gender and Candidate Success in a Field Experiment.” American Journal of Political Science 61 (4): 927–43.10.1111/ajps.12300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjøller, Frederik Klaaborg, and Pedersen, Lene Holm. 2025. “The Gendered Cost of Politics.” British Journal of Political Science 55: e59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klar, Samara. 2014. “Identity and Engagement among Political Independents in America: Political Psychology.” Political Psychology 35 (4): 577–91.10.1111/pops.12036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klar, Samara, Krupnikov, Yanna, and Barry Ryan, John. 2022. “Who Are Leaners? How True Independents Differ from the Weakest Partisans and Why It Matters.” The Forum 20 (1): 147–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolltveit, Kristoffer. 2022. “Gender and Ambitions for Elected and Appointed Political Positions: Insights from Norway.” European Journal of Politics and Gender 5 (1): 109–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komatsoulis, Carolyn. 2025. “‘Ridiculous:’ Saloon Owner Offers Bounty for Incriminating Info on Boise Mayor.” Idaho Statesman, December 17. www.idahostatesman.com/news/local/community/boise/article313754209.html.Google Scholar
Kreitzer, Rebecca J., and Osborn, Tracy L.. 2019. “The Emergence and Activities of Women’s Recruiting Groups in the U.S.” Politics, Groups & Identities (Abingdon) 7 (4): 842–52.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2020. Violence Against Women in Politics. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena, and Sanín, Juliana Restrepo. 2020. “The Cost of Doing Politics? Analyzing Violence and Harassment against Female Politicians.” Perspectives on Politics 18 (3): 740–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Land, Joni Auden. 2022a. “‘Am I next?’: Idaho Politicians Face Increasing Threats and Harassment While in Office.” Idaho Statesman, February 27. www.idahostatesman.com/news/local/community/boise/article258798088.html.Google Scholar
Land, Joni Auden. 2022b. “Boise Mayor Speaks out against Threats Made toward Her, Her Family and Other Officials.” Idaho Statesman, March 3. www.idahostatesman.com/news/local/community/boise/article259024878.html.Google Scholar
Langton, Charlie, and Nissen, Jack. 2025. “The Race for Office in Detroit Heats up with Dozens Vying for Office.” FOX 2 Detroit, April 22. www.fox2detroit.com/news/detroit-mayor-election-nine-candidates-file-run-citys-top-seat.Google Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L., and Fox, Richard L.. 2010. It Still Takes A Candidate: Why Women Don’t Run for Office. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511778797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L., and Fox, Richard L.. 2015. Running from Office: Why Young Americans Are Turned off to Politics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lazarus, Jeffrey, and Steigerwalt, Amy. 2018. Gendered Vulnerability. University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.9718595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Fiona. 2018. “How Prepared Do I Have to Be for a Job? Gender Differences in the Desire for Preparedness.” PhD, Stanford University. www.proquest.com/docview/2436893739/abstract/97CAF4838AA34C11PQ/1.Google Scholar
LGBTQ+ Victory Institute. 2026. Out for America. https://outforamerica.org/, accessed May 2026.Google Scholar
Liang, Chen. 2025. “Gendered Panethnic Solidarity: The Experiences of Asian American Women in US Electoral Politics.” Qualitative Sociology 48 (1): 97–119.10.1007/s11133-024-09583-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lueders, Hans. 2025. “The Local Costs of Moving: How Residential Moves Weaken Local Engagement.” Comparative Political Studies, November 5, 1–35.Google Scholar
Maestas, Cherie. 2003. “The Incentive to Listen: Progressive Ambition, Resources, and Opinion Monitoring among State Legislators.” The Journal of Politics 65 (2): 439–56.10.1111/1468-2508.t01-3-00008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBrayer, Markie, and Williams, Robert Lucas. 2023. “The Second Sex in the Second District: The Policy Effects of Electing Women to County Government.” Political Research Quarterly 76 (2): 825–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, Steve, and Mair, Christine A.. 2010. “Social Capital Across the Life Course: Age and Gendered Patterns of Network Resources.” Sociological Forum 25 (2): 335–59.10.1111/j.1573-7861.2010.01179.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrath, Robert J., Ryan, Josh, and Wrighten, Jatia. 2025. “High Hurdles: Legislative Professionalism and the Effectiveness of Women State Legislators.” The Journal of Politics OnlineFirst (May).10.1086/736866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, Lauren. 2022. “Statement from Mayor McLean.” City of Boise, March 3. www.cityofboise.org/news/mayor/2022/march/statement-from-mayor-mclean/.Google Scholar
McNamara, Brittney. 2017. “This College Student Won’t Let Islamophobia Stop Her From Running for Political Office.” Teen Vogue. www.teenvogue.com/story/chicago-college-student-bushra-amiwala-running-for-politcal-office.Google Scholar
Medie, Peace A., and Prillaman, Soledad Artiz. 2026. “Nonelite Women’s Participation in Politics.” Annual Review Political Science. 29: In press.10.1146/annurev-polisci-042924-095655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montoya, Lisa J., Hardy-Fanta, Carol, and Garcia, Sonia. 2000. “Latina Politics: Gender, Participation, and Leadership.” PS: Political Science & Politics 33 (3): 555–62.Google Scholar
Motel, Seth. 2014. “Who Runs for Office? A Profile of the 2%.” Pew Research Center, September 3. www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/09/03/who-runs-for-office-a-profile-of-the-2/.Google Scholar
Nadeem, Reem. 2024. “How Party Identification of US Voters Has Shifted Since the 1990s.” Voter Demographics. Pew Research Center, April 9. www.pewresearch.org/politics/2024/04/09/changing-partisan-coalitions-in-a-politically-divided-nation/.Google Scholar
Nealy, Lisa Nikol. 2009. African American Women Voters: Racializing Religiosity, Political Consciousness and Progressive Political Action in U.S. Presidential Elections from 1964 through 2008. University Press of America.Google Scholar
Neavling, Steve. 2023. “Mary Sheffield Lays out Vision for a More Equitable Detroit, If She Runs for Mayor.” Detroit Metro Times, August 31. www.metrotimes.com/news/mary-sheffield-lays-out-vision-for-a-more-equitable-detroit-if-she-runs-for-mayor-34017146/.Google Scholar
Neklason, Annika. 2018. “Moms Running for Office Are Finally Advertising Their Motherhood.” The Atlantic, July 23.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa, and Lovenduski, Joni. 1995. Political Recruitment: Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ohmura, Tamaki, and Bailer, Stefanie. 2023. “Power-Seeking, Networking and Competition: Why Women Do Not Rise in Parties.” West European Politics 46 (5): 897–927.10.1080/01402382.2022.2097442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, Sarah, and Conroy, Meredith. 2018. “Tough Enough for the Job? How Masculinity Predicts Recruitment of City Council Members.” American Politics Research 46 (6): 1094–122.10.1177/1532673X17729719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, Sarah, and Conroy, Meredith. 2020. Who Runs? The Masculine Advantage in Candidate Emergence. University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ondercin, Heather L. 2022. “Location, Location, Location: How Electoral Opportunities Shape Women’s Emergence as Candidates.” British Journal of Political Science 52 (4): 1523–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, Michael L., and Gunderson, Anna. 2023. “Noncongruent Policymaking by Cities for Citizens with Criminal Records: Representation, Organizing, and ‘Ban the Box’.” Political Research Quarterly 76 (2): 977–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pailhé, Ariane, Solaz, Anne, and Stanfors, Maria. 2021. “The Great Convergence: Gender and Unpaid Work in Europe and the United States.” Population and Development Review 47 (1): 181–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Barbara, and Simon, Dennis. 2003. “Political Ambition and Women in the US House of Representatives, 1916–2000.” Political Research Quarterly 56 (2): 127–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, Kathryn, and Dancey, Logan. 2011. “Speaking for the Underrepresented in the House of Representatives: Voicing Women’s Interests in a Partisan Era.” Politics & Gender 7 (4): 493–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelosi, Christine. 2019. The Nancy Pelosi Way: Advice on Success, Leadership, and Politics from America’s Most Powerful Woman. Skyhorse Publishing.Google Scholar
Preece, Jessica Robinson, and Stoddard, Olga Bogach. 2015. “Does the Message Matter? A Field Experiment on Political Party Recruitment.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 2 (1): 26–35.10.1017/xps.2014.17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prillaman, Soledad Artiz. 2023a. “Strength in Numbers: How Women’s Groups Close India’s Political Gender Gap.” American Journal of Political Science 67 (2): 390–410.10.1111/ajps.12651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prillaman, Soledad Artiz. 2023b. The Patriarchal Political Order: The Making and Unraveling of the Gendered Participation Gap in India. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781009355797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rule, Wilma. 1981. “Why Women Don’t Run: The Critical Contextual Actors in Women’s Legislative Recruitment.” Western Political Science Quarterly 34: 60–77.10.1177/106591298103400106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rule, Wilma. 1998. “Political Recruitment: Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament.” American Political Science Review 92 (2): 478–81.Google Scholar
Sahn, Alexander. 2025. “Public Comment and Public Policy.” American Journal of Political Science 69 (2): 685–700.10.1111/ajps.12900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salwender, Mona, and Stahlberg, Dagmar. 2024. “Do Women Only Apply When They Are 100% Qualified, Whereas Men Already Apply When They Are 60% Qualified?” European Journal of Social Psychology 54 (7): 1545–57.10.1002/ejsp.3109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2006a. “Gender Pools and Puzzles: Charting a Path to the Legislature.” Politics & Gender 1 (3): 387–400.Google Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2006b. Where Women Run: Gender and Party in the American States. University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.168630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanín, Juliana Restrepo. 2020. “Violence against Women in Politics: Latin America in an Era of Backlash.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 45 (2): 302–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapiro, Virginia. 1982. “Private Costs of Public Commitments or Public Costs of Private Commitments? Family Roles versus Political Ambition.” American Journal of Political Science 26 (2): 265–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, Brian, Shih, Marissa, Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Pope, Jeremy. 2025. “Cooperative Election Study Common Content, 2024.” https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/X11EP6, Harvard Dataverse, V9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheick, Cassandra June. 2022. “Vote for Mom: How Campaign Funds for Childcare Can Increase the Number of Women in American Politics.” PhD Thesis, Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
Schlozman, Kay Lehman, Burns, Nancy, Verba, Sidney, and Donahue, Jesse. 1995. “Gender and Citizen Participation: Is There a Different Voice?” American Journal of Political Science 39 (2): 267–93.10.2307/2111613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Monica C., Holman, Mirya R., Diekman, Amanda B., and McAndrew, Thomas. 2016. “Power, Conflict, and Community: How Gendered Views of Political Power Influence Women’s Political Ambition.” Political Psychology 37 (4): 515–31.10.1111/pops.12268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Monica C., and Bos, Angela L.. 2019. “The Application of Social Role Theory to the Study of Gender in Politics.” Political Psychology 40 (S1): 173–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Monica C., Sweet-Cushman, Jennie, and Gordon, Taylor. 2023. “Role Model Do No HARM: Modeling Achievable Success Inspires Social Belonging and Women’s Candidate Emergence.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 44 (1): 105–20.10.1080/1554477X.2023.2155775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A., and Mishler, William. 2005. “An Integrated Model of Women’s Representation.” The Journal of Politics 67 (2): 407–28.10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00323.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Jamil. 2022. “It’s All about the Money: Understanding How Black Women Fund Their Campaigns.” PS: Political Science & Politics 55 (2): 297–300.Google Scholar
Shah, Paru. 2015. “Stepping up: Black Political Ambition and Success.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 3 (2): 278–94.10.1080/21565503.2015.1031801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, Paru, Scott, Jamil, and Gonzalez Juenke, Eric. 2019. “Women of Color Candidates: Examining Emergence and Success in State Legislative Elections.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 7 (2): 429–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shames, Shauna L. 2017. Out of the Running: Why Millennials Reject Political Careers and Why It Matters. New York University Press.10.18574/nyu/9781479801282.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidorsky, Kaitlin. 2015. “Moving on Up? The Gendered Ambitions of State-Level Appointed Officials.” Political Research Quarterly 68 (4): 802–15.10.1177/1065912915607638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, Andrea, and Skulley, Carrie. 2019. “Always Running: Candidate Emergence among Women of Color over Time.” Political Research Quarterly 72 (2): 342–59.10.1177/1065912918789289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaughter, Christine, Crowder, Chaya, and Greer, Christina. 2024. “Black Women: Keepers of Democracy, the Democratic Process, and the Democratic Party.” Politics & Gender 20 (1): 162–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaughter, Christine. 2025. “Black Agency and Black Political Attitudes: Examining Major Questions with Contemporary Data.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 13 (5): 1133–53.10.1080/21565503.2025.2466548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stauffer, Katelyn E. 2021. “Public Perceptions of Women’s Inclusion and Feelings of Political Efficacy.” American Political Science Review 115 (4): 1226–41.10.1017/S0003055421000678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweet-Cushman, Jennie. 2020. “Where Does the Pipeline Get Leaky? The Progressive Ambition of School Board Members and Personal and Political Network Recruitment.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 8 (4): 762–85.10.1080/21565503.2018.1541417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweet-Cushman, Jennie. 2022. “Legislative vs. Executive Political Offices: How Gender Stereotypes Can Disadvantage Women in Either Office.” Political Behavior 44 (1): 411–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swers, Michele L. 2002. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swers, Michele L. 2013. Women in the Club: Gender and Policymaking in the Senate. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teele, Dawn Langan, Kalla, Joshua, and Rosenbluth, Frances. 2018. “The Ties That Double Bind: Social Roles and Women’s Underrepresentation in Politics.” American Political Science Review 112 (3): 525–41.10.1017/S0003055418000217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terriquez, Veronica. 2012. “Civic Inequalities? Immigrant Incorporation and Latina Mothers’ Participation in Their Children’s Schools.” Sociological Perspectives 55 (4): 663–82.10.1525/sop.2012.55.4.663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, Danielle M. 2015. “Why So Few (Republican) Women? Explaining the Partisan Imbalance of Women in the U.S. Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 40 (2): 295–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, Danielle M., and Swers, Michele L.. 2017. “Which Women Can Run? Gender, Partisanship, and Candidate Donor Networks.” Political Research Quarterly 70 (2): 449–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, Danielle M., and King, Aaron S.. 2020. “Women’s Representation and the Gendered Pipeline to Power.” American Political Science Review 114 (4): 989–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, Danielle M., and Sanders, Bailey K.. 2020. “Gender Differences in Legislator Responsiveness.” Perspectives on Politics 18 (4): 1017–30.10.1017/S1537592719003414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolley, Erin, Lawlor, Andrea, and Fortier-Chouinard, Alexandre. 2023. “‘Whiny, Fake, and I Don’t Like Her Hair’: Gendered Assessments of Mayoral Candidates.” Urban Affairs Review 59 (4): 977–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trapnell, Paul D., and Paulhus, Delroy L.. 2012. “Agentic and Communal Values: Their Scope and Measurement.” Journal of Personality Assessment 94 (1): 39–52.10.1080/00223891.2011.627968CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trounstine, Jessica, and Valdini, Melody E.. 2008. “The Context Matters: The Effects of Single-Member versus At-Large Districts on City Council Diversity.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (3): 554–69.10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00329.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyree-Herrmann, Sarah, McDonald, Jared, and Cooperman, Rosalyn. 2025. “Hostile Sexism and the 2024 Blame Game.” The Forum 23 (1–2): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varsanyi, Monica W. 2005. “The Paradox of Contemporary Immigrant Political Mobilization: Organized Labor, Undocumented Migrants, and Electoral Participation in Los Angeles.” Antipode 37 (4): 775–95.10.1111/j.0066-4812.2005.00525.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varsanyi, Monica W. 2006. “Interrogating ‘Urban Citizenship’ Vis-à-Vis Undocumented Migration.” Citizenship Studies 10 (2): 229–49.10.1080/13621020600633168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volden, Craig, Wiseman, Alan E., and Wittmer, Dana E.. 2013. “When Are Women More Effective Lawmakers Than Men?” American Journal of Political Science 57 (2): 326–41.10.1111/ajps.12010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vrielink, Jade, and Joanna Van Der Pas, Daphne. 2024. “Part of the Job? The Effect of Exposure to the Online Intimidation of Politicians on Political Ambition.” Political Studies Review 22 (4): 1022–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, Susan. 1978. “Recruitment of Women To Public Office: A Discriminant Analysis.” Western Political Quarterly 31 (3): 372–80.10.1177/106591297803100307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Ariel, Walker, Hannah L., Michelson, Melissa, and Roth, Sam. 2026. “Getting Out the (Newly-Enfranchised) Vote: Encouraging Voter Registration After Rights Restoration.” Political Behavior 48: 923–45.10.1007/s11109-025-10055-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Katie. 2026. “About Katie Wilson.” Katie Wilson, January 14. www.wilsonforseattle.com/about.Google Scholar
Winter, Hannah Murphy. 2025. “The Making of Katie Wilson.” The Stranger, October. www.thestranger.com/news/2025/10/02/80265661/the-making-of-katie-wilson.Google Scholar
Wolbrecht, Christina. 2000. The Politics of Women’s Rights: Parties, Positions, and Change. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wolbrecht, Christina, and Campbell, David E.. 2017. “Role Models Revisited: Youth, Novelty, and the Impact of Female Candidates.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 5 (3): 418–34.10.1080/21565503.2016.1268179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zukin, Cliff. 2006. A New Engagement? Political Participation, Civic Life, and the Changing American Citizen. Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195183177.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.0 A
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The HTML of this Element conforms to version 2.0 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), ensuring core accessibility principles are addressed and meets the basic
(A)
level of WCAG compliance, addressing essential accessibility barriers.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
Visual Accessibility
Use of high contrast between text and background colour
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.
Structural and Technical Features
ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.