Element contents
Hegel on the Family Form
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 February 2026
Summary
Hegel famously argues that the patriarchal, bourgeois nuclear family is a rational institution worth defending. Scholars have asked what exactly to do with this seemingly outdated part of his social and political philosophy. In particular, they have wondered whether Hegel's concept of the family can accommodate changes to our understanding of what counts as a family and what constitutes family relations. In this Element, I ask whether Hegel's defense of the family can be reconciled with family abolition, the project not of reforming the family as an institution, but of radically transforming it beyond recognition. By examining the three relationships that Hegel associates with the family – brothers and sisters, husbands and wives, and parents and children – I argue that Hegel's concept of the family can be reconciled with family abolition so described. What Hegel provides is an account of the family as a site at which important goods have been discovered and eveloped, without claiming that the family as an institution is necessary for, or even ideally suited to, their continued realization. These goods are singular individuality, ethical love, and material resources.
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781009586733Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 26 March 2026
Bibliography
Primary Sources
Elements of the Philosophy of Right (trans. H. B. Nisbet), Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Benhabib, Seyla. “On Hegel, Woman, and Irony,” in Situating the Self: Gender, Community, and Post-Modernism in Contemporary Ethics. New York: Routledge 1992, 242–259.Google Scholar
Berg, Anastasia and Wiseman, Rachel. What Are Children For? On Ambivalence and Choice. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2024.Google Scholar
Bockenheimer, Eva. Hegels Familien- und Geschlechtertheorie. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 2013.Google Scholar
Brake, Elizabeth. “Love’s Paradox: Making Sense of Hegel on Marriage,” Women’s Philosophy Review, 22, 1999, 80–104.Google Scholar
Brake, Elizabeth Minimizing Marriage: Marriage, Morality and the Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brauer, Susanne. Natur und Sittlichkeit: Die Familie in Hegels Rechtsphilosophie. Baden-Baden: Karl Alber, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. Antigone’s Claim: Kinship Between Life and Death. New York: Columbia University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. Pursuits of Happiness: the Hollywood Comedy of Remarriage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Ciavatta, David V. Spirit, the Family, and the Unconscious in Hegel’s Philosophy, Albany: SUNY Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Daub, Adrian. Uncivil Unions: The Metaphysics of Marriage in German Idealism and Romanticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Boer, Karin. “Hegel’s Antigone and the Dialectics of Cultural Difference,” Philosophy Today 47:5, 2003, 140–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deranty, Jean-Philippe. “The ‘Son of Civil Society’: Tensions in Hegel’s Account of Womanhood,” Philosophical Forum, 31:2, 2000, 145–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easton, Susan M. “Hegel and Feminism,” in David Lamb (ed.), Hegel and Modern Philosophy. New York: Croom Helm, 1987, 30–55.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean. Public Man, Private Woman: Women in Social and Political Thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Mark. Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative? Winchester: Zero Books, 2009.Google Scholar
Geller, Jay. “Hegel’s Self‐Conscious Woman,” Modern Language Quarterly, 53:2, 1992, 173–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregoratto, Federica. Love Troubles: A Philosophy of Eros. New York: Columbia University Press, 2025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halper, Edward C. “Hegel’s Family Values,” The Review of Metaphysics, 54:4, 2001, 815–858.Google Scholar
Hausen, Karin. “Die Polarisierung der ‘Geschlechtscharaktere’ – Eine Spiegelung der Dissoziation von Erwerbs- und Familienleben,” in Werner Conze (ed.), Sozialgeschichte der Familie in der Neuzeit Europas, 1978, 363–393.Google Scholar
Heim, Léon A. “‘Natürlicher sittlicher Geist’: Die Familie als sittliches Naturverhältnis,” in Hegel-Jahrbuch. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, Thimo. “Hegel on Childless Marriage,” Hegel Bulletin, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Hodge, Joanna. “Women and the Hegelian State,” in Kennedy, Ellen and Mendus, Susan (eds.), Women and Western Political Philosophy: Kant to Nietzsche. London: St. Martin’s Press, 1987, 127–158.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel. The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honneth, Axel Freedom’s Right: The Social Foundations of Democratic Life. New York: Columbia University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Hopwood, Mark. “The Extremely Difficult Realization That Something Other Than Oneself Is Real: Iris Murdoch and Love and Moral Agency,” European Journal of Philosophy, 26:1, 2018, 477–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchings, Kimberly and Pulkkinen, Tuija (eds.), Hegel’s Philosophy and Feminist Thought: Beyond Antigone? New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. Speculum of the Other Woman. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. “Eternal Irony of the Community” in Mills, Patricia J. (ed.), Feminist Interpretations of G. W. F. Hegel, University Park, PA: Penn State University Press, 1996, 45–57.Google Scholar
Jaeggi, Rahel. Critique of Forms of Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Kain, Philip J. “Hegel, Recognition, and Same-Sex Marriage,” Journal of Social Philosophy, 46:2, 2015, 226–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Gal. “‘Love Is Only between Living Beings Who are Equal in Power’: On What Is Alive (And What Is Dead) in Hegel’s Account of Marriage,” European Journal of Philosophy, 28:1, 2020, 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobe, Zdravko. “Keine Frau muss müssen? Hegel in the Time of MeToo,” Crisis and Critique 8:2, 2021, 206–225.Google Scholar
Kolodny, Niko. “Love as Valuing a Relationship,” The Philosophical Review 112:2, 2003, 135–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krell, David Farrell. “Lucinde’s Shame: Hegel, Sensuous Woman, and the Law,” in Mills, Patricia J. (ed.), Feminist Interpretations of G. W. F. Hegel, University Park, PA: Penn State University Press, 1996, 89–107.Google Scholar
Lettow, Susanne. “Re-articulating Genealogy: Hegel on Kinship, Race and Reproduction,” Hegel Bulletin 42:2, 2021, 256–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Sophie. Abolish the Family: A Manifesto for Care and Liberation. London: Verso, 2022.Google Scholar
Locatelli, Silvia. “Hegel’s Antigone: A Revolutionary Role,” Unpublished Manuscript.Google Scholar
Loyd, Genevieve. “Feminism in History of Philosophy: Appropriating the Past,” in Fricker, M. and Jennifer. Hornsby (eds.), Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000, 245–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mateo, Marina Martinez. Kritik der Familie, Unpublished Manuscript.Google Scholar
May, Simon. Love: A New Understanding of an Ancient Emotion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Moland, Lydia. Hegel’s Aesthetics: The Art of Idealism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyar, Dean. Hegel’s Value: Justice as the Living Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munoz-Dardé, Véronique. “Is the Family to be Abolished Then?” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 99, 1999, 37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, Patricia J. “Hegel’s Antigone,” in Mills, Patricia J. (ed.), Feminist Interpretations of G. W. Hegel, University Park, PA: Penn State University Press, 1996, 59–88.Google Scholar
Mills, Patricia J. ed. Feminist Interpretations of G. W. F. Hegel. University Park: Penn State University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Murdoch, Iris. “The Sublime and the Good,” in Conradi, Peter (ed.), Existentialists and Mystics: Writings on Philosophy and Literature. New York: Penguin Books, 1999. 205–220.Google Scholar
Neuhouser, Frederick. Foundations of Hegel’s Social Theory: Actualizing Freedom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuhouser, Frederick Diagnosing Social Pathology: Rousseau, Hegel, Marx and Durkheim. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023.Google Scholar
Novakovic, Andreja. Hegel on Second Nature in Ethical Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novakovic, Andreja “No Utopia: Hegel on the Gendered Division of Labor,” in Moyar, Dean, Walsh, Kate Padgett, and Rand, Sebastian (eds.), Hegel’s Philosophy of Right: Critical Perspectives on Freedom and History. London: Routledge, 2023, 206–232.Google Scholar
Novakovic, Andreja and Maksymchuk, Oksana. “Hegel and Plato on How to Become Good,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 30:4, 2022, 707–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Brian, M. E. Family Abolition: Capitalism and the Communizing of Care. London: Pluto Press, 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, Mary. “Hegel: Man, Physiology, Fate,” in Mills, Patricia J. (ed.), Feminist Interpretations of G. W. F. Hegel, University Park, PA: Penn State University Press, 1996, 177–207.Google Scholar
Okazaki, Yuka. “Das Vermögen der Familie in Hegels Rechtsphilosophie,” Hegel-Jahrbuch 2019:1, 2019, 646–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, Frances. “Hegel, Sexual Ethics, and the Oppression of Women: Comments on Krell’s ‘Lucinde’s Shame’,” in Mills, Patricia J. (ed.), Feminist Interpretations of G.W.F. Hegel, University Park, PA: Penn State University Press, 1996, 109–117.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole “Hegel, Marriage, and the Standpoint of Contract,” in Mills, Patricia J. (ed.), Feminist Interpretations of G. W. F. Hegel, University Park, PA: Penn State University Press, 1996, 209–223.Google Scholar
Pinkard, Terry. Hegel’s Phenomenology: The Sociality of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Ravven, Heidi. “Has Hegel Anything to Say to Feminists?” The Owl of Minerva, 19:2, 1988, 149–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rodgers, Dorothy. America’s First Women Philosophers: Transplanting Hegel, 1860 – 1925. London: Continuum, 2005.Google Scholar
Scholz, Sally J. “Reproductive Labor: The Impact of the Patriarchal Family on Hegel’s Phenomenology,” Clio, 22:4, 1993.Google Scholar
Spillers, Hortense. “Mama’s Baby, Papa’s Maybe: An American Grammar Book,” Diacritics, 17:2, 1987, 64–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stafford, Antoinette. “The Feminist Critique of Hegel on Women and the Family,” Animus, 2, 1997, 64–92.Google Scholar
Stone, Alison. “Gender, the Family, and the Organic State,” in Brooks, Thom (ed.), Hegel’s Philosophy of Right: Essays on Ethics, Politics, and Law, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell,. 2012, 143–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Alison “Hegel on law, women, and contract,” in Drakopoulou, Maria (ed.), Feminist Encounters with Legal Philosophy. New York: Routledge 2014, 104–122.Google Scholar
Tzelepis, Elena. “Antigone’s Dissidence,” in Lettow, Susanne and Pulkkinen, Tuija (eds.), Palgrave Handbook of German Idealism and Feminist Philosophy, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2022, 249–270.Google Scholar
Vernon, Jim. “Free Love: A Hegelian Defense of Same-Sex Marriage Rights,” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 47:1, 2010, 69–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vuillerod, Jean-Baptiste. Hegel Féministe: Les Aventures D’Antigone. Paris: Vrin, 2020.Google Scholar
Willett, Cynthia. “Hegel, Antigone, and the Possibility of Ecstatic Dialogue,” Philosophy and Literature 14:2, 1990, 268–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allen. Hegel’s Ethical Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zizek in “Hegel on Marriage,” E-Flux Journal, 24, 2012, 1–10. www.e-flux.com/journal/34/68365/hegel-on-marriage/.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.1 AA
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The HTML of this Element complies with version 2.1 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), covering newer accessibility requirements and improved
user experiences and achieves the intermediate
(AA)
level of WCAG compliance, covering a wider range of accessibility requirements.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Structural and Technical Features
ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.