Element contents
How to Use Generative AI in Educational Research
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 October 2025
Summary
Artificial Intelligence technologies have impacted our world in ways we could not have imagined a decade ago. Generative AI (GenAI), a powerful, complex and general use subset of AI has become available to the public in recent years. GenAI's effect on education, research, and academic practice is far-reaching and exciting, yet also deeply concerning. While GenAI has the potential to offer transformation in the practice of educational research, there are few resources which clarify why, when, and how these tools might be used ethically and sensitively. This Element introduces key areas of consideration for education researchers seeking to use GenAI, including examining the existing research, critically evaluating the benefits and risks of GenAI in educational research, and providing example use-cases of good and bad practice.
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781009675338Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 04 December 2025
References
Adams, P. (2006). Exploring social constructivism: Theories and practicalities. Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004270600898893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alm, A., & Watanabe, Y. (2023). Integrating ChatGPT in language education: A freirean perspective. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 11(3 (Special Issue)), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2023.121404.Google Scholar
Alser, M., & Waisberg, E. (2023). Concerns with the usage of ChatGPT in academia and medicine: A viewpoint. American Journal of Medicine Open, 9, 100036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100036.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Al-Zahrani, A. M. (2024). The impact of generative AI tools on researchers and research: Implications for academia in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(5), 1029–1043. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2271445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amano, T., Ramírez-Castañeda, V., Berdejo-Espinola, V., et al. (2023). The manifold costs of being a non-native English speaker in science. PLOS Biology, 21(7), e3002184. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ansari, A. N., Ahmad, S., & Bhutta, S. M. (2024). Mapping the global evidence around the use of ChatGPT in higher education: A systematic scoping review. Education and Information Technologies, 29(9), 11281–11321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12223-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ariyaratne, S., Iyengar, K. P., & Botchu, R. (2023). Will collaborative publishing with ChatGPT drive academic writing in the future? British Journal of Surgery, 110(9), 1213–1214. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znad198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arkoudas, K. (2023). ChatGPT is no stochastic parrot. but it also claims that 1 is greater than 1. Philosophy & Technology, 36(3), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00619-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashraf, H., & Ashfaq, H. (2024). The role of ChatGPT in medical research: Progress and limitations. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 52(3), 458–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-023-03311-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asmawi, A., & Alam, Md. S. (2024). Understanding the digital epistemologies of Chat GPT: Towards a decolonial language pedagogy. Proceedings of the 2024 8th International Conference on Digital Technology in Education (ICDTE), 277–283. https://doi.org/10.1145/3696230.3696248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, S., Agarwal, A., & Singla, S. (2024). LLMs Will Always Hallucinate, and We Need to Live With This (No. arXiv:2409.05746). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.05746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banh, L., & Strobel, G. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence. Electronic Markets, 33(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-023-00680-1.Google Scholar
Barany, A., Nasiar, N., Porter, C., et al. (2024). ChatGPT for education research: Exploring the potential of large language models for qualitative codebook development. In Olney, A. M., Chounta, I.-A., Liu, Z., Santos, O. C., & Bittencourt, I. I. (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 134–149). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-64299-9_10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barros, A., Prasad, A., & Śliwa, M. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence and academia: Implication for research, teaching and service. Management Learning, 54(5), 597–604. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505076231201445.Google Scholar
Basit, T. N. (2013). Ethics, reflexivity and access in educational research: Issues in intergenerational investigation. Research Papers in Education, 28(4), 506–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2012.689318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskara, F. R. (2024). ChatGPT and critical digital pedagogy: Examining the potential and challenges for educational practice. Proceeding of the International Conference of Inovation, Science, Technology, Education, Children, and Health, 4(1), Article 1.Google Scholar
Bearman, M., & Ajjawi, R. (2023). Learning to work with the black box: Pedagogy for a world with artificial intelligence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(5), 1160–1173. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13337.Google Scholar
Bearman, M., Tai, J., Dawson, P., Boud, D., & Ajjawi, R. (2024). Developing evaluative judgement for a time of generative artificial intelligence. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(6), 893–905. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2335321.Google Scholar
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 610–623. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berthelot, A., Caron, E., Jay, M., & Lefèvre, L. (2024). Estimating the environmental impact of Generative-AI services using an LCA-based methodology. Procedia CIRP, 122, 707–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2024.01.098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bijker, R., Merkouris, S. S., Dowling, N. A., & Rodda, S. N. (2024). ChatGPT for automated qualitative research: Content analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26(1), e59050. https://doi.org/10.2196/59050.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bin-Nashwan, S. A., Sadallah, M., & Bouteraa, M. (2023). Use of ChatGPT in academia: Academic integrity hangs in the balance. Technology in Society, 75, 102370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102370.Google Scholar
Bishop, J. M. (2021). Artificial intelligence is stupid and causal reasoning will not fix it. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.513474.Google Scholar
Biswas, S. S. (2023). ChatGPT for research and publication: A step-by-step guide. The Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 28(6), 576–584. https://doi.org/10.5863/1551-6776-28.6.576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bjelobaba, S., Waddington, L., Perkins, M., et al. (2024). Research Integrity and GenAI: A Systematic Analysis of Ethical Challenges across Research Phases (No. arXiv:2412.10134). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.10134.Google Scholar
Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (1997). Qualitative Research for Education (Vol. 368). Allyn & Bacon Boston, MA. http://math.buffalostate.edu/dwilson/med595/qualitative_intro.pdf.Google Scholar
Boulus-Rødje, N., Cranefield, J., Doyle, C., & Fleron, B. (2024). GenAI and me: The hidden work of building and maintaining an augmentative partnership. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-024-01810-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bozkurt, A. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence (AI) powered conversational educational agents: The inevitable paradigm shift. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 198–204. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7716416.Google Scholar
Bridgeman, A., Liu, D., & Weeks, R. (2024). Program level assessment design and the two-lane approach – Teaching@Sydney. https://educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au/teaching@sydney/program-level-assessment-two-lane/.Google Scholar
Bringula, R. (2025). What do academics have to say about ChatGPT? A text mining analytics on the discussions regarding ChatGPT on research writing. AI and Ethics, 5, 371–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00354-w.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burger, B., Kanbach, D. K., Kraus, S., Breier, M., & Corvello, V. (2023). On the use of AI-based tools like ChatGPT to support management research. European Journal of Innovation Management, 26(7), 233–241. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2023-0156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caplan, N. (2024). Is It a Chatbot or a False Dichotomy. Nigel Caplan. https://nigelcaplan.com/.Google Scholar
Chadwick, L. (2024). Could Microsoft’s new AI feature really correct hallucinations? Euronews. www.euronews.com/next/2024/09/26/microsoft-claims-its-new-ai-correction-feature-can-fix-hallucinations-does-it-work.Google Scholar
Chakravarty, A. (2024). Research note ‘replicating published literature review using ChatGPT-plus: Observations’. Customer Needs and Solutions, 11(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40547-024-00144-3.Google Scholar
Chan, C. K. Y., & Colloton, T. (2024). Generative AI in Higher Education: The ChatGPT Effect. Taylor & Francis Group. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/jcu/detail.action?docID=31281986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobern, W. W. (1993). Constructivism. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 4(1), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532768xjepc0401_8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coghlan, D., & Brydon-Miller, M. (2014). Positionality. In Coghlan, D., & Brydon-Miller, M. (Eds.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Action Research (pp. 628–628). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446294406.Google Scholar
Combrinck, C. (2024). A tutorial for integrating generative AI in mixed methods data analysis. Discover Education, 3(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00214-7.Google Scholar
Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148.Google Scholar
Dalalah, D., & Dalalah, O. M. A. (2023). The false positives and false negatives of generative AI detection tools in education and academic research: The case of ChatGPT. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(2), 100822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100822.Google Scholar
Daniel, S. J. (2020). Education and the COVID-19 pandemic. PROSPECTS, 49(1), 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09464-3.Google ScholarPubMed
Darder, A., Hernandez, K., Lam, K. D., & Baltodano, M. (2023). Critical pedagogy: An introduction. In The critical pedagogy reader (pp. 1–30). Routledge.Google Scholar
Darvishi, A., Khosravi, H., Sadiq, S., Gašević, D., & Siemens, G. (2024). Impact of AI assistance on student agency. Computers & Education, 210, 104967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, T. (2023). A preliminary investigation of fake peer-reviewed citations and references generated by ChatGPT. The Professional Geographer, 75(6), 1024–1027. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2023.2190373.Google Scholar
Delios, A., Tung, R. L., & van Witteloostuijn, A. (2025). How to intelligently embrace generative AI: The first guardrails for the use of GenAI in IB research. Journal of International Business Studies. 56, 451–460. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-024-00736-0.Google Scholar
Deng, R., Jiang, M., Yu, X., Lu, Y., & Liu, S. (2025). Does ChatGPT enhance student learning? A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies. Computers & Education, 227, 105224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019). BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding (No. arXiv:1810.04805). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1810.04805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowling, M., & Lucey, B. (2023). ChatGPT for (Finance) research: The Bananarama Conjecture. Finance Research Letters, 53, 103662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.103662.Google Scholar
Downes, S. (2022). Connectivism. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), Article 1. https://asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/623.Google Scholar
Eaton, S. E. (2022). The academic integrity technological arms race and its impact on learning, teaching, and assessment. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 48(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt28388.Google Scholar
Eaton, S. E. (2023). Postplagiarism: Transdisciplinary ethics and integrity in the age of artificial intelligence and neurotechnology. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00144-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emsley, R. (2023). ChatGPT: These are not hallucinations – they’re fabrications and falsifications. Schizophrenia, 9(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-023-00379-4.Google Scholar
European Union. (n.d.). The General Data Protection Regulation. Consilium. Retrieved December 21, 2024, www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/data-protection/data-protection-regulation/.Google Scholar
European Union. (2024). High-Level Summary of the AI Act | EU Artificial Intelligence Act. https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/high-level-summary/.Google Scholar
Flanagin, A., Pirracchio, R., Khera, R., et al. (2024). Reporting use of AI in research and scholarly publication—JAMA network guidance. JAMA, 331(13), 1096–1098. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.3471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Floridi, L. (2020). AI and its new winter: From myths to realities. Philosophy & Technology, 33(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00396-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floridi, L. (2024). Why the AI hype is another tech bubble. Philosophy & Technology, 37(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00817-w.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furze, L., Perkins, M., Roe, J., & MacVaugh, J. (2024). The AI assessment scale (AIAS) in action: A pilot implementation of GenAI-supported assessment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 40(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.9434.Google Scholar
Gamage, K. A. A., Silva, E. K. de, & Gunawardhana, N. (2020). Online delivery and assessment during COVID-19: Safeguarding academic integrity. Education Sciences, 10(11), Article 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10110301.Google Scholar
Gaumann, Noëlle & Veale, Michael (2024). AI providers as criminal essay mills? Large language models meet contract cheating law. Information and Communications Technology Law 10.1080/13600834.2024.2352692. (In press).Google Scholar
George, A. S. (2023). The potential of generative AI to reform graduate education. Partners Universal International Research Journal, 2(4), 36–50.Google Scholar
Gilson, A., Safranek, C. W., Huang, T., et al. (2023). How does ChatGPT perform on the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE)? The implications of large language models for medical education and knowledge assessment. JMIR Medical Education, 9, e45312. https://doi.org/10.2196/45312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ginde, G. (2024). ‘So What If I Used GenAI?’ – Implications of Using Cloud-Based GenAI in Software Engineering Research (No. arXiv:2412.07221). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.07221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachs, Goldman. (2024). AI Investment Forecast to Approach $200 Billion Globally by 2025. www.goldmansachs.com/insights/articles/ai-investment-forecast-to-approach-200-billion-globally-by-2025.Google Scholar
Google. (2024a). Google NotebookLM | Note Taking & Research Assistant Powered by AI. https://notebooklm.google/.Google Scholar
Google. (2024b). Try Deep Research and our New Experimental Model in Gemini, your AI Assistant. https://blog.google/products/gemini/google-gemini-deep-research/.Google Scholar
Goto, A., & Katanoda, K. (2023). Should we acknowledge ChatGPT as an author? Journal of Epidemiology, 33(7), 333–334. https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.JE20230078.Google ScholarPubMed
GOV. (2025). Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education. GOV.UK. www.gov.uk/government/publications/generative-artificial-intelligence-in-education/generative-artificial-intelligence-ai-in-education.Google Scholar
Gray, A. (2024). ChatGPT ‘Contamination’: Estimating the Prevalence of LLMs in the Scholarly Literature (No. arXiv:2403.16887). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.16887.Google Scholar
Grubaugh, S., Levitt, G., & Deever, D. (2023). Harnessing AI to power constructivist learning: An evolution in educational methodologies. EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, 1(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.59652/jetm.v1i3.43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grzybowski, A., Pawlikowska–Łagód, K., & Lambert, W. C. (2024). A history of artificial intelligence. Clinics in Dermatology, 42(3), 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2023.12.016.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hadan, H., Wang, D. M., Mogavi, R. H., et al. (2024). The great AI witch hunt: Reviewers’ perception and (Mis)conception of generative AI in research writing. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 2(2), 100095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100095.Google Scholar
Haman, M., & Školník, M. (2024). Using ChatGPT to conduct a literature review. Accountability in Research, 31(8), 1244–1246. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2023.2185514.Google ScholarPubMed
Han, J., Qiu, W., & Lichtfouse, E. (2024). ChatGPT in scientific research and writing: A beginner’s guide. In Han, J., Qiu, W., & Lichtfouse, E. (Eds.), ChatGPT in Scientific Research and Writing: A Beginner’s Guide (pp. 1–109). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66940-8_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haßler, B., Hassan, S. M., Klune, C., Mansour, H., & Friese, L. (2024). Using AI to Automate the Literature Review Process in Education: A Topic Brief (No. 183). EdTech Hub. https://doi.org/10.53832/edtechhub.1003.Google Scholar
Heikkilä, M. (2023). Making an Image with Generative AI Uses as Much Energy as Charging Your Phone | MIT Technology Review. www.technologyreview.com/2023/12/01/1084189/making-an-image-with-generative-ai-uses-as-much-energy-as-charging-your-phone/.Google Scholar
Herweijer, C. (2018, January 24). 8 Ways AI Can Help Save the Planet. World Economic Forum. www.weforum.org/stories/2018/01/8-ways-ai-can-help-save-the-planet/.Google Scholar
Hicks, M. T., Humphries, J., & Slater, J. (2024). ChatGPT Is Bullshit. Ethics and Information Technology, 26(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-024-09775-5.Google Scholar
Honig, C. (2024). GenAI Teachers: Constructivist Learning Design and Value Propositions. ASCILITE Publications, 287–297. https://doi.org/10.14742/apubs.2024.1487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoskins, P., & Rahman-Jones, . (2025, January 27). DeepSeek: Chinese AI Model Rockets to Top of App Charts. BBC News. www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0qw7z2v1pgo.Google Scholar
Hosseini, M., Gao, P., & Vivas-Valencia, C. (2024). A social-environmental impact perspective of generative artificial intelligence. Environmental Science and Ecotechnology, 100520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2024.100520.Google Scholar
Hosseini, M., & Horbach, S. P. J. M. (2023). Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 8(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-023-00133-5.Google ScholarPubMed
Huang, L., Yu, W., Ma, W., et al. (2024). A survey on hallucination in large language models: Principles, taxonomy, challenges, and open questions. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 3703155. https://doi.org/10.1145/3703155.Google Scholar
Hurley, Z. (2024). Generative AI’s family portraits of whiteness: A postdigital semiotic case study. Postdigital Science and Education, 6(4), 1240–1260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-024-00491-3.Google Scholar
Inala, J. P., Wang, C., Drucker, S., et al. (2024). Data Analysis in the Era of Generative AI (No. arXiv:2409.18475). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.18475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, J. A., Wade, K., Fiesler, C., & Brubaker, J. R. (2021). Supporting serendipity: Opportunities and challenges for human-AI collaboration in qualitative analysis. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449168.Google Scholar
Jin, Y., Yan, L., Echeverria, V., Gašević, D., & Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2025). Generative AI in higher education: A global perspective of institutional adoption policies and guidelines. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100348.Google Scholar
Kantor, J. (2024). Best practices for implementing ChatGPT, large language models, and artificial intelligence in qualitative and survey-based research. JAAD International, 14, 22–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdin.2023.10.001.Google ScholarPubMed
Kaplan, A., & Haenlein, M. (2019). Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence. Business Horizons, 62(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalifa, M., & Albadawy, M. (2024). Using artificial intelligence in academic writing and research: An essential productivity tool. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update, 5, 100145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpbup.2024.100145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiley, J. (2024). Chapter 6: Benefits, Pitfalls, Ethics and Realities of GenAI in Research. www.elgaronline.com/edcollchap/book/9781035332724/book-part-9781035332724-12.xml.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kousha, K. (2024). How is ChatGPT acknowledged in academic publications? Scientometrics, 129(12), 7959–7969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05193-y.Google Scholar
Kumar, S., & Gunn, A. (2024). Doctoral students’ reflections on generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) use in the literature review process. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 62(4), 1395–1408. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2024.2427049.Google Scholar
Lee, V. V., Lubbe, S. C. C. van der, Goh, L. H., & Valderas, J. M. (2024). Harnessing ChatGPT for thematic analysis: Are we ready? Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26(1), e54974. https://doi.org/10.2196/54974.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leslie, D. (2023). Does the sun rise for ChatGPT? Scientific discovery in the age of generative AI. AI and Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00315-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, E. S., & Bai, S. (2024). Generative AI and the future of connectivist learning in higher education. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 18(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2024.2386085.Google Scholar
Liang, W., Yuksekgonul, M., Mao, Y., Wu, E., & Zou, J. (2023). GPT Detectors are Biased against Non-native English Writers (No. arXiv:2304.02819). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.02819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Limo, F. A. F., Tiza, D. R. H., Roque, M. M., et al. (2023). Personalized tutoring: ChatGPT as a virtual tutor for personalized learning experiences. Przestrzeń Społeczna (Social Space), 23(1), Article 1.Google Scholar
Lingard, L. (2023). Writing with ChatGPT: An illustration of its capacity, limitations & implications for academic writers. Perspectives on Medical Education, 12(1), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.1072.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, C. H., & Matthews, R. (2005). Vygotsky’s Philosophy: Constructivism and Its Criticisms Examined. International Education Journal, 6(3), 386–399.Google Scholar
Luccioni, A. S., Jernite, Y., & Strubell, E. (2024). Power hungry processing: Watts driving the cost of AI deployment? The 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1145/3630106.3658542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macfarlane, B., Zhang, J., & Pun, A. (2014). Academic integrity: A review of the literature. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 339–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.709495.Google Scholar
McMahon, L., Kleinman, Z., & Edwards, . (2025, January 12). Artificial Intelligence: Plan to ‘Unleash AI’ across UK Revealed. BBC News. www.bbc.com/news/articles/crr05jykzkxo.Google Scholar
Messeri, L., & Crockett, M. J. (2024). Artificial intelligence and illusions of understanding in scientific research. Nature, 627(8002), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07146-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research | UNESCO. www.unesco.org/en/articles/guidance-generative-ai-education-and-research.Google Scholar
Misra, D. P., & Chandwar, K. (2023). ChatGPT, artificial intelligence and scientific writing: What authors, peer reviewers and editors should know. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, 53(2), 90–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/14782715231181023.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mohammadzadeh, Z., Ausloos, M., & Saeidnia, H. R. (2023). ChatGPT: High-tech plagiarism awaits academic publishing green light. Non-fungible token (NFT) can be a way out. Library Hi Tech News, 40(7), 12–14. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-04-2023-0067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorhouse, B. L. (2024). We’re Living in a World of Artificial Intelligence – It’s Academic Publishing that Needs to Change. THE Campus Learn, Share, Connect. www.timeshighereducation.com/campus/were-living-world-artificial-intelligence-its-academic-publishing-needs-change.Google Scholar
Moya, B., Eaton, S. E., Pethrick, H., et al. (2023). Academic integrity and artificial intelligence in higher education contexts: A rapid scoping review protocol. Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity, 5(2), Article 2.Google Scholar
Nachalon, Y., Broer, M., & Nativ-Zeltzer, N. (2024). Using chatGPT to generate research ideas in dysphagia: A pilot study. Dysphagia, 39(3), 407–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-023-10623-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newman, M., & Gough, D. (2020). Systematic reviews in educational research: Methodology, perspectives and application. In Zawacki-Richter, O., Kerres, M., Bedenlier, S., Bond, M., & Buntins, K. (Eds.), Systematic Reviews in Educational Research (pp. 3–22). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27602-7_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolleti, L., & Bass, D. (2023). Generative AI Takes Stereotypes and Bias from Bad to Worse. Bloomberg. www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2023-generative-ai-bias/.Google Scholar
Nyaaba, M., Wright, A., & Choi, G. L. (2024a). Generative AI and Digital Neocolonialism in Global Education: Towards an Equitable Framework (No. arXiv:2406.02966). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.02966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omena, J. J., Autuori, A., Vasconcelos, E. L., Subet, M., & Botta, M. (2024). AI methodology map: Practical and theoretical approach to engage with genAI for digital methods research. Sociologica, 18(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/19566.Google Scholar
OpenAI. (2018). Improving Language Understanding with Unsupervised Learning. https://openai.com/index/language-unsupervised/.Google Scholar
Ozano, K., & Khatri, R. (2018). Reflexivity, positionality and power in cross-cultural participatory action research with research assistants in rural Cambodia. Educational Action Research, 26(2), 190–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2017.1331860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peres, R., Schreier, M., Schweidel, D., & Sorescu, A. (2023). On ChatGPT and beyond: How generative artificial intelligence may affect research, teaching, and practice. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 40(2), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2023.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, M. (2023). Academic integrity considerations of AI large language models in the post-pandemic era: ChatGPT and beyond. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 20(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.02.07.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, M., Furze, L., Roe, J., & MacVaugh, J. (2024). The Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale (AIAS): A framework for ethical integration of generative AI in educational assessment. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 21(06), Article 06. https://doi.org/10.53761/q3azde36.Google Scholar
Perkins, M., & Roe, J. (2024a). Academic publisher guidelines on AI usage: A ChatGPT supported thematic analysis. F1000Research, 12, 1398. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.142411.2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perkins, M., & Roe, J. (2024b). Decoding academic integrity policies: A corpus linguistics investigation of AI and other technological threats. Higher Education Policy, 37(3), 633–653. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-023-00323-2.Google Scholar
Perkins, M., & Roe, J. (2024c). Generative AI Tools in Academic Research: Applications and Implications for Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methodologies (No. arXiv:2408.06872). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.06872.Google Scholar
Perkins, M., & Roe, J. (2024d). The use of Generative AI in qualitative analysis: Inductive thematic analysis with ChatGPT. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 390–395. https://journals.sfu.ca/jalt/index.php/jalt/article/download/1585/753/5729.Google Scholar
Perkins, M., Roe, J., Vu, B. H., et al. (2024). Simple techniques to bypass GenAI text detectors: Implications for inclusive education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00487-w.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrier, E., & Bennett, M. T. (2024). An AI System Has Reached Human Level on a Test for ‘General Intelligence’: Here’s What that Means. The Conversation. http://theconversation.com/an-ai-system-has-reached-human-level-on-a-test-for-general-intelligence-heres-what-that-means-246529.Google Scholar
Picazo-Sanchez, P., & Ortiz-Martin, L. (2024). Analysing the impact of ChatGPT in research. Applied Intelligence, 54(5), 4172–4188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-024-05298-0.Google Scholar
Pichai, S., Hassabis, D., & Kavukcuoglu, K. (2024). Introducing Gemini 2.0: Our New AI Model for the Agentic Era. Google. https://blog.google/technology/google-deepmind/google-gemini-ai-update-december-2024/.Google Scholar
Pratschke, B. M. (2024). Generative AI and Education: Digital Pedagogies, Teaching Innovation and Learning Design. Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67991-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, A. (2018). Improving Language Understanding by Generative Pre-training. https://hayate-lab.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/43372bfa750340059ad87ac8e538c53b.pdf.Google Scholar
Rashid, S., & Yadav, S. S. (2020). Impact of Covid-19 pandemic on higher education and research. Indian Journal of Human Development, 14(2), 340–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973703020946700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, S., Giroux, M., Piven, I., Sima, H., & Dodd, P. (2024). A constructivist approach to integrating AI in marketing education: Bridging theory and practice. Journal of Marketing Education, 02734753241288876. https://doi.org/10.1177/02734753241288876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ríos, C. de los, & Patel, L. (2023). Positions, positionality, and relationality in educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. 1–12. www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09518398.2023.2268036.Google Scholar
Roe, J. (2025). Generative AI as cultural artifact: Applying anthropological methods to AI literacy. Postdigital Science and Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-025-00547-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, J., Furze, L., & Perkins, M. (2024). Funhouse Mirror or Echo Chamber? A Methodological Approach to Teaching Critical AI Literacy Through Metaphors (No. arXiv:2411.14730). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.14730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, J., & Perkins, M. (2022). What are automated paraphrasing tools and how do we address them? A review of a growing threat to academic integrity. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 18(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-022-00109-w.Google Scholar
Roe, J., & Perkins, M. (2023). ‘What they’re not telling you about ChatGPT’: Exploring the discourse of AI in UK news media headlines. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02282-w.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, J., & Perkins, M. (2024a). Deepfakes and higher education: A research agenda and scoping review of synthetic media. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 21(10), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.53761/2y2np178.Google Scholar
Roe, J., & Perkins, M. (2024b). Generative AI and Agency in Education: A Critical Scoping Review and Thematic Analysis (No. arXiv:2411.00631). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.00631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, J., & Perkins, M. (2024d). Generative AI in Self-Directed Learning: A Scoping Review (No. arXiv:2411.07677). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.07677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, J., Perkins, M., Chonu, G. K., & Bhati, A. (2023). Student perceptions of peer cheating behaviour during COVID-19 induced online teaching and assessment. Higher Education Research & Development, 43(4), 966–980. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2023.2258820Google Scholar
Roe, J., Perkins, M., Chonu, G. K., & Bhati, A. (2024). Student perceptions of peer cheating behaviour during COVID-19 induced online teaching and assessment. Higher Education Research & Development, 43(4), 966–980. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2023.2258820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, J., Perkins, M., & Furze, L. (2024). Deepfakes and higher education: A research agenda and scoping review of synthetic media. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 21(10), 1–22.Google Scholar
Roe, J., Perkins, M., & Ruelle, D. (2024a). Is GenAI the future of feedback? Understanding student and staff perspectives on AI in assessment. Intelligent Technologies in Education. https://open-publishing.org/journals/index.php/ited/article/view/1184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, J., Renandya, W., & Jacobs, G. (2023). A review of AI-powered writing tools and their implications for academic integrity in the language classroom. Journal of English and Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.59588/2961-3094.1035.Google Scholar
Rudolph, J., Ismail, F. M. M., & Popenici, S. (2024). Higher education’s generative artificial intelligence paradox: The meaning of chatbot mania. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 21(06), Article 06. https://doi.org/10.53761/54fs5e77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023a). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9.Google Scholar
Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023b). War of the chatbots: Bard, Bing Chat, ChatGPT, Ernie and beyond. The new AI gold rush and its impact on higher education. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 364–389.Google Scholar
Ruksakulpiwat, S., Kumar, A., & Ajibade, A. (2023). Using ChatGPT in medical research: Current status and future directions. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 16(null), 1513–1520. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S413470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saccenti, D., Buattini, M., Grazioli, S., & Torres, D. (2024). Navigating the AI frontier: Should we fear ChatGPT use in higher education and scientific research? Finding a middle ground through guiding principles and practical applications. Possibility Studies & Society, 2(4), 415–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/27538699241231862.Google Scholar
Sarı, T., Nayir, F., & Bozkurt, A. (2024). Reimagining education: Bridging artificial intelligence, transhumanism, and critical pedagogy. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 7(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1308022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seta, G. de, Pohjonen, M., & Knuutila, A. (2023). Synthetic Ethnography: Field Devices for the Qualitative Study of Generative Models. OSF. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/zvew4.Google Scholar
Shardlow, M., & Przybyła, P. (2024). Deanthropomorphising NLP: Can a language model be conscious? PLOS ONE, 19(12), e0307521. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharma, M., Tong, M., Korbak, T., et al. (2023). Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Models (No. arXiv:2310.13548). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.13548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrivastava, R. (2024). Garbage in, Garbage out: Perplexity Spreads Misinformation From Spammy AI Blog Posts. Forbes. www.forbes.com/sites/rashishrivastava/2024/06/26/search-startup-perplexity-increasingly-cites-ai-generated-sources/.Google Scholar
Siemens, G. (2018). Connectivism. Foundations of Learning and Instructional Design Technology: Historical Roots and Current Trends. https://edtechbooks.org/lidtfoundations/connectivism.Google Scholar
Singh Chawla, D. (2024). Is ChatGPT corrupting peer review? Telltale words hint at AI use. Nature, 628(8008), 483–484. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-01051-2.Google ScholarPubMed
Stanistreet, P., Elfert, M., & Atchoarena, D. (2020). Education in the age of COVID-19: Understanding the consequences. International Review of Education, 66(5), 627–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-020-09880-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strzelecki, A., Cicha, K., Rizun, M., & Rutecka, P. (2024). Acceptance and use of ChatGPT in the academic community. Education and Information Technologies, 29(17), 22943–22968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12765-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suppes, P. (1974). The place of theory in educational research. Educational Researcher, 3(6), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X003006003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, G., & Eaton, S. E. (2024). A rapid investigation of artificial intelligence generated content footprints in scholarly publications. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 55(3), 337–355. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp-2023-0079.Google Scholar
Tang, K.-S. (2024). Claiming the research expertise on human–GenAI interaction for sociolinguistics. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 28(5), 16–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TEQSA. (2022). What Is Academic Integrity? | Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency. www.teqsa.gov.au/students/understanding-academic-integrity/what-academic-integrity.Google Scholar
Tricco, AC, et al. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473.Google ScholarPubMed
Turner, K. L., Adams, J. D., & Eaton, S. E. (2022). Academic integrity, STEM education, and COVID-19: A call to action. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 17(2), 331–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-021-10090-4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turobov, A., Coyle, D., & Harding, V. (2024). Using ChatGPT for Thematic Analysis (No. arXiv:2405.08828). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.08828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Berg, G., & du Plessis, E. (2023). ChatGPT and generative AI: Possibilities for its contribution to lesson planning, critical thinking and openness in teacher education. Education Sciences, 13(10), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13100998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Manen, M. (2023). What does ChatGPT mean for qualitative health research? Qualitative Health Research, 33(13), 1135–1139. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323231210816.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., et al. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 1–11. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2017/hash/3f5ee243547dee91fbd053c1c4a845aa-Abstract.html.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and Language (pp. xxi, 168). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/11193-000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wachinger, J., Bärnighausen, K., Schäfer, L. N., Scott, K., & McMahon, S. A. (2024). Prompts, pearls, imperfections: Comparing ChatGPT and a human researcher in qualitative data analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 10497323241244669. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323241244669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, R.-C., Yang, D., Hsieh, M.-C., Chen, Y.-C., & Lin, W. (2024). GenAI-assisted database deployment for heterogeneous indigenous–native ethnographic research data. Applied Sciences, 14(16), 7414. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14167414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, S., Wang, F., Zhu, Z., Wang, J., Tran, T., & Du, Z. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 252, 124167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124167.Google Scholar
Warr, M. (2024). Blending generative AI, critical pedagogy, and teacher education to expose and challenge automated inequality. In Blankenship, R., Cherner, T. (Eds.), Research Highlights in Technology and Teacher Education. AACE.Google Scholar
Watermeyer, R., Lanclos, D., Phipps, L., et al. (2024). Academics’ weak(ening) resistance to generative AI: The cause and cost of prestige? Postdigital Science and Education. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-024-00524-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber-Wulff, D., Anohina-Naumeca, A., Bjelobaba, S., et al. (2023). Testing of detection tools for AI-generated text. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00146-z.Google Scholar
Wei, J., Tay, Y., Bommasani, R., et al. (2022). Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models (No. arXiv:2206.07682). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2206.07682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitfield, S., & Hofmann, M. A. (2023). Elicit: AI literature review research assistant. Public Services Quarterly, 19(3), 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2023.2224125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, A., Milagros, M., & Gebru, T. (2022). The Exploited Labor behind Artificial Intelligence. Noema. www.noemamag.com/the-exploited-labor-behind-artificial-intelligence/.Google Scholar
Wu, X., Duan, R., & Ni, J. (2024). Unveiling security, privacy, and ethical concerns of ChatGPT. Journal of Information and Intelligence, 2(2), 102–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiixd.2023.10.007.Google Scholar
Xu, F., Uszkoreit, H., Du, Y., et al. (2019). Explainable AI: A brief survey on history, research areas, approaches and challenges. In Tang, J., Kan, M.-Y., Zhao, D., Li, S., & Zan, H. (Eds.), Natural Language Processing and Chinese Computing (Vol. 11839, pp. 563–574). Springer International. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32236-6_51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, L., Echeverria, V., Fernandez-Nieto, G. M., et al. (2024). Human-AI collaboration in thematic analysis using ChatGPT: A user study and design recommendations. Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613905.3650732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yao, J.-Y., Ning, K.-P., Liu, Z.-H., et al. (2024). LLM Lies: Hallucinations Are Not Bugs, but Features as Adversarial Examples (No. arXiv:2310.01469). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.01469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zawacki-Richter, O., Kerres, M., Bedenlier, S., Bond, M., & Buntins, K. (Eds.). (2020). Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives and Application. Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27602-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, H., Wu, C., Xie, J., et al. (2024). Redefining Qualitative Analysis in the AI Era: Utilizing ChatGPT for Efficient Thematic Analysis (No. arXiv:2309.10771). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.10771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, W. X., Zhou, K., Li, J., et al. (2024). A Survey of Large Language Models (No. arXiv:2303.18223). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.18223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhgenti, S., & Holmes, W. (2023). Generative AI and Education: Adopting a Critical Approach. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10177781/1/Zhgenti%20and%20Holmes%20-%202023%20-%20Generative%20AI%20and%20Education%20Adopting%20a%20Critical%20A.pdf.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.1 AA
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The HTML of this Element
complies with version 2.1 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), covering newer accessibility requirements and improved
user experiences and achieves the intermediate
(AA)
level of WCAG compliance, covering a wider range of accessibility requirements.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Structural and Technical Features
ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
- 8
- Cited by