Element contents
Series: Elements in the Problems of God
The Problem of God in David Hume
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 November 2023
Summary
David Hume (1711-1776) is one of the foremost critics of attempts to provide rational arguments in support of traditional Christian theism in Western philosophy. In this Element, the authors examine Hume's chief objections to the cosmological argument, the design argument, and the argument from miracles, along with some main responses to these objections. The authors also examine Hume's seminal version of the argument from evil, which is deployed in an effort to show that traditional Christian theism is lacking in coherent meaning. Drawing on recent developments in Hume scholarship according to which Hume's ultimate philosophical aim was to further an anti-Christian agenda, an attempt is made to situate Hume's writings on God and religion in an unfolding narrative that is impacted throughout by the trenchant religious criticisms of Hume's chief philosophical predecessor, Thomas Hobbes.
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in the Problems of GodOnline ISBN: 9781009270243Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 18 January 2024
References
Bailey, A., & O’Brien, D. 2014. Hume’s Critique of Religion: “Sick Men’s Dreams.” Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beauchamp, T., ed. 2000. David Hume: An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, T., ed. 2009. David Hume: An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berman, D. 1983. “Enlightenment and Counter-Enlightenment in Irish Philosophy.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 65, 148–165.Google Scholar
Bourget, D., & Chalmers, D. 2014. “What Do Philosophers Believe?” Philosophical Studies 170, 465–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burleigh, J. H. S. 1960. A Church History of Scotland. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burns, R. M. 1981. The Great Debate on Miracles: From Joseph Glanvill to David Hume. London: Associated University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, S. 1705. A Demonstration of the Being and Attributes of God. London: Will. Botham.Google Scholar
Clarke, S. 1706. A Discourse Concerning the Unchangeable Obligations of Natural Religion, and the Truth and Certainty of the Christian Revelations. London: Will. Botham.Google Scholar
Descartes, R. 1984. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. 2. Eds. Cottingham, J., Stoofhoff, R., & Murdoch, D. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Descartes, R. 1985. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. 1. Eds. Cottingham, J., Stoofhoff, R., & Murdoch, D. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Earman, D. 2000. Hume’s Abject Failure: The Argument against Miracles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogelin, R. 1985. Hume’s Skepticism in the Treatise of Human Nature. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fogelin, R. 2005. A Defense of Hume on Miracles. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Foster, S. 1997. Melancholy Duty: The Hume-Gibbon Attack on Christianity. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaskin, J. C. A. 2009. “Hume on Religion.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hume. Edited by Norton, D., & Taylor, J., 480–513. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, H. G. 1901. The Social Life of Scotland in the Eighteenth Century. London: Adam & Charles Black.Google Scholar
Greig, J. Y. T., ed. 1932. The Letters of David Hume, 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hendel, Charles. 1963. Studies in the Philosophy of David Hume. New York: Bobbs Merrill.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. 1998. Leviathan. Edited by Gaskin, J. C. A. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, D. 1740. An Abstract of a Book Lately Published Entitled A Treatise of Human Nature. London: C. Borbet.Google Scholar
Hume, D. 1748. Philosophical Essays Concerning Human Understanding. London: A. Millar.Google Scholar
Hume, D. 1751. Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals. London: A. Millar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, D. 1967. A Letter from a Gentleman to His Friend in Edinburgh. Edited by Mossner, E. C., & Price, J. V. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Hurlbutt, R. 1965. Hume, Newton, and the Design Argument. Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Kemp Smith, N., ed. 1935. Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kemp Smith, N., ed. 1947. Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. Edinburgh: Thomas Nelson.Google Scholar
Klibansky, R., & Mossner, E., eds. 1954. New Letters of David Hume. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kraal, A. 2013a. “Philo’s Argument from Evil in Hume’s Dialogues X: A Semantic Interpretation.” Sophia 52, 573–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraal, A. 2013b. “Anglicanism, Scottish Presbyterianism, and the Irreligious Aim of Hume’s Treatise.” Hume Studies 39, 169–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraal, A., & Russell, P. 2021. “Hume on Religion.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2021 Ed.). Edited by Zalta, E. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/hume-religion/.Google Scholar
Locke, J. 1706. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. London: Awnsham and John Churchill.Google Scholar
Mossner, E. 1948. “Hume’s Early Memoranda, 1729–1740: The Complete Text.” Journal of the History of Ideas 9, 492–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mossner, E., & Ross, I., eds. 1977. The Correspondence of Adam Smith. New York: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Noxon, J. 1976. “Hume’s Concern with Religion.” The Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 7, 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, P. 2008. The Riddle of Hume’s Treatise: Skepticism, Naturalism, and Irreligion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, P. 2021. Recasting Hume and Early Modern Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryken, P. 1995. Thomas Boston as Preacher of the Fourfold State. Exeter: Paternoster Press.Google Scholar
Scott, G., & Pottle, F., eds. 1931. Private Papers of James Boswell, vol. 12, 227–232. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sher, R. 1985. Church and University in the Scottish Enlightenment: The Moderate Literati of Edinburgh. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sher, R. 1990. “Professors of Virtue: The Social History of the Edinburgh Moral Philosophy Chair in the Eighteenth Century.” In Studies in the Philosophy of the Scottish Enlightenment. Edited by Stewart, M. A., 87–126. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, M. A. 1985. “Hume and the ‘Metaphysical Argument A Priori’.” In Philosophy, Its History, and Historiography. Edited by Holland, A. J., 243–270. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, M. A. 1995. The Kirk and the Infidel. Lancaster: Lancaster University Publications.Google Scholar
Yandell, K. 1990. Hume’s Inexplicable Mystery: His Views on Religion. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this Element is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 9
- Cited by