No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Diagnostic and classification systems with special emphasis on the Minicompendium
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 September 2015
Summary
With the introduction of major tranquillizers more than three decades ago symptom rating scales were soon accepted as the method of evaluating their clinical effects. The Mini-compendium is a collection of rating scales for measuring outcome of antianxiety drugs, antidepressants, antimanics, and anti-psychotics. The scales have been selected by their “cash values”, i.e. the scales most frequently used for the respective dimensions. These scales have been further developed in terms of strict item definitions. The simple sum of the individual scale items has been considered as a sufficient statistic if they fulfilled latent structure analysis of shared phenomenology.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Scandinavian College of Neuropsychopharmacology 1990
References
Literatuur
1van Praag, HM. The role of biological psychiatry in psychiatry. In: Pepplinkhuizen, L, Verhoeven, WMA, eds. Biological psychiatry in Europe. Leiderdorp: DeMedicus, 1987:5–10.Google Scholar
2 Editorial comments. Rose is a rose is a rose is a rose. Psychiatr Quatrl 1957;31:346–361.Google Scholar
3Bech, P, Rastrup, M, Rafaelsen, OJ. Mini-compendium of rating scales. Acta Psychiatr Scand; 73 (suppl. 326): 1–37. (Dutch version: D'Haenen HAH, Verhoeven WMA, eds. Brussels: VUB Press, 1989.)Google Scholar
4American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 3rd ed. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1980.Google Scholar
5Rasch, G. Probalistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research, 1960. (Reprint: Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.)Google Scholar
6Freud, S. The justification for detaching from neurasthenia a particular syndrome: The anxiety neurosis. Collected papers: vol 1. New York: Basic Book, 1959:76–106.Google Scholar
7Hamilton, M. Diagnosis and rating of anxiety. Brit J Psychiat 1969 (special publication): 76–79.Google Scholar
8Hamilton, M. A rating scale for depression. J. Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 1960; 23:56–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Hamilton, M. Frequency of symptoms in melancholia (depressive illness). Brit J Psychiat 1989; 154:201–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Maier, W, Philipp, M. Comparative analysis of observer depression scales. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1985; 72:239–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Chambon, O, Cialdella, P, Kiss, Let al.Study of the unidimensionality of the Bech-Rafaelsen Melancholia Scale using Rasch analysis in a French sample of major depressive disorders. Pharmacopsychiatry 1990 (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Bech, P. Rating scales for affective disorders: Their validity and consistency. Acta Psychiatr Scand; 64(suppl. 295): 1–101.Google Scholar
13.Bech, P. A review of the antidepressant properties of serotonin reuptake inhibitors. In: Mendlewicz, J, van Praag, HM, eds. Advances in biological psychiatry. Basel: Karger, 1988:58–69.Google Scholar
14.Bech, P, Rafaelsen, OJ, Kramp, Pet al.The Mania Rating Scale: Scale construction and inter-observer agreement. Neuropharmacology 1978; 17:430–431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Overall, JE, Gorham, DR. The brief psychiatric rating scale. Psychol Rep 1962; 10:799–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Overall, JE. The brief psychiatric rating scale in psychopharmacology research. In: Pichot, P, ed. Pschychological measurement in psychopharmacology. Basel: Karger, 1974:67–78.Google Scholar
17.Andersen, J, Larsen, JK, Schultz, Vet al.The brief psychiatric rating scale. Dimension of schizophrenia. Psychopathology 1989; 22: 168–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Kay, SR, Opler, LA, Fiszbein, A. Positive and negative syndrome scale. New York: Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1986.Google Scholar