Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-54qdv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T15:47:17.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bond percolation on honeycomb and triangular lattices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2016

John C. Wierman
John C. Wierman*
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
*
∗ Postal address: School of Mathematics, 127 Vincent Hall, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The two common critical probabilities for a lattice graph L are the cluster size critical probability pH (L) and the mean cluster size critical probability pT (L). The values for the honeycomb lattice H and the triangular lattice T are proved to be pH (H) = pT (H) = 1–2 sin (π/18) and PH (T) = pT (T) = 2 sin (π/18). The proof uses the duality relationship and the star-triangle relationship between the two lattices, to find lower bounds for sponge-crossing probabilities.

Keywords

BOND PERCOLATIONCRITICAL PROBABILITYSTAR-TRIANGLE RELATIONSPONGE-CROSSING PROBABILITYPERCOLATION THEORY

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in Applied Probability , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , June 1981 , pp. 298 - 313
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 1981 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Research supported by NSF MCS 78-01168.

References

[1] Broadbent, S. R. and Hammersley, J. M. (1957) Percolation processes. I. Crystals and mazes. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 53, 629–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Dean, P. and Bird, N. F. (1967) Monte Carlo estimates of critical probabilities. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 63, 477–479.Google Scholar
[3] Essam, J. W. (1972) Percolation and cluster size. In Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, Volume 2, ed. Domb, C. and Sykes, M. S., Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
[4] Fortuin, C. M, Kasteleyn, P. W., and Ginibre, J. (1971) Correlation inequalities on some partially ordered sets. Commun. Math. Phys. 22, 89–103.Google Scholar
[5] Frisch, H. L. and Hammersley, J. M. (1963) Percolation processes and related topics. J. SIAM 11, 894–918.Google Scholar
[6] Frisch, H. L., Hammersley, J. M., and Welsh, D. J. A. (1962) Monte Carlo estimates of percolation probabilities for various lattices. Phys. Rev. 126, 949–951.Google Scholar
[7] Grimmett, G. R. (1976) On the number of clusters in the percolation model. J. London Math. Soc. (2) 13, 346–350.Google Scholar
[8] Harris, T. E. (1960) A lower bound for the critical probability in a certain percolation process. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 56, 13–20.Google Scholar
[9] Kesten, H. (1980) The critical probability of bond percolation on the square lattice equals ½. Commun. Math. Phys. 74, 41–59.Google Scholar
[10] Russo, L. (1978) A note on percolation. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitsth. 43, 39–48.Google Scholar
[11] Seymour, P. D. and Welsh, D. J. A. (1978) Percolation probabilities on the square lattice Ann. Discrete Math. 3, 227–245.Google Scholar
[12] Shante, V. K. S. and Kirkpatrick, S. (1971) An introduction to percolation theory. Adv. Phys. 20, 325–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] Smythe, R. T. and Wierman, J. C. (1978) First-Passage Percolation on the Square Lattice Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics 671, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
[14] Sykes, M. F. and Essam, J. W. (1964) Exact critical percolation probabilities for the site and bond problems in two dimensions, J. Math. Phys. 5, 1117–1132.Google Scholar
[15] Wierman, J. C. (1978) On critical probabilities in percolation theory. J. Math. Phys. 19, 1979–1982.Google Scholar