Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2rsb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T08:30:38.848Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dynamic admission control for loss systems with batch arrivals

Part of:Stochastic systems and controlOperations research and management science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2016

E. L. Örmeci and
A. Burnetas
E. L. Örmeci*
Affiliation:
Koç University
A. Burnetas*
Affiliation:
University of Athens
*
∗ Postal address: Department of Industrial Engineering, Koç University, Rumeli Feneri Yolu, 34450 Sarıyer, İstanbul, Turkey. Email address: lormeci@ku.edu.tr
∗∗ Postal address: Department of Mathematics, University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis, 15784 Athens, Greece. Email address: aburnetas@math.uoa.gr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

We consider the problem of dynamic admission control in a Markovian loss system with two classes. Jobs arrive at the system in batches; each admitted job requires different service rates and brings different revenues depending on its class. We introduce the definition of a ‘preferred class’ for systems receiving mixed and single-class batches separately, and derive sufficient conditions for each system to have a preferred class. We also establish a monotonicity property of the optimal value functions, which reduces the number of possibly optimal actions.

Keywords

Admission controlloss systembatch arrival

MSC classification

Primary:93E20: Optimal stochastic control
Secondary:90B99: None of the above, but in this section

Information

Type
General Applied Probability
Information
Advances in Applied Probability , Volume 37 , Issue 4 , December 2005, pp. 915 - 937
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2005 

References

Altman, E. (2002). Applications of Markov decision processes in communication networks. In Handbook of Markov Decision Processes, eds Feinberg, E. A. and Shwartz, A., Kluwer, Boston, MA, pp. 489–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, E., Jiménez, T. and Koole, G. M. (2001). On optimal call admission control in a resource-sharing system. IEEE Trans. Commun 49, 1659–1668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrizosa, E., Conde, E. and Munoz-Marquez, M. (1998). Admission policies in loss queueing models with heterogeneous arrivals. Manag. Sci. 44, 311–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrol, W. and Grimes, R. (1995). Evolutionary change in product management. Experiences in the car rental industry. Interfaces 25, 84–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geraghty, M. K. and Johnson, E. (1997). Revenue management saves national car rental. Interfaces 27, 107–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, J. M. (1975). Dynamic scheduling of a multiclass queue. Discount optimality. Operat. Res. 23, 270–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippman, S. A. (1975). Applying a new device in the optimization of exponential queueing systems. Operat. Res. 23, 687–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippman, S. A. and Ross, S. M. (1971). The streetwalker's dilemma. A Job shop model. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 20, 336–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippman, S. A. and Stidham, S. M. (1977). Individual versus social optimization in exponential congestion systems. Operat. Res. 25, 233–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Z., Nain, P. and Towsley, D. (1995). Sample path methods in the control of queues. Queueing Systems 21, 293–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, B. (1971). A queuing reward system with several customer classes. Manag. Sci. 16, 234–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naor, P. (1969). On the regulation of queue size by levying tolls. Econometrica 37, 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Örmeci, E. L. and Burnetas, A. N. (2004). Admission control with batch arrivals. Operat. Res. Lett. 32, 448–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Örmeci, E. L., Burnetas, A. N. and Emmons, H. (2002). Dynamic policies of admission to a two-class system based on customer offers. IIE Trans. 34, 813–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Örmeci, E. L., Burnetas, A. N. and van der Wal, J. (2001). Admission policies for a two class loss system. Stoch. Models 17, 513–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puhalskii, A. A. and Reiman, M. I. (1998). A critically loaded multirate link with trunk reservation. Queueing Systems 28, 157–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puterman, M. (1994). Markov Decision Processes. John Wiley, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Righter, R. (1994). Scheduling. In Stochastic Orders and Their Applications, eds Shaked, M. and Shanthikumar, J. G., Academic Press, Boston, MA, pp. 381–432.Google Scholar
Ross, K. W. (1995). Multiservice Loss Models for Broadband Telecommunication Networks. Springer, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, S. M. (1970). Applied Probability Models with Optimization Applications. Dover, New York.Google Scholar
Savin, S., Cohen, M., Gans, N. and Katalan, Z. (2000). Capacity management in rental businesses with heterogeneous customer bases. Operat. Res. 53, 617–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walrand, J. (1988). Introduction to Queueing Networks. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
Xu, S. H. and Shanthikumar, J. G. (1993). Optimal expulsion control—a dual approach to admission control of an ordered-entry system. Operat. Res. 41, 1137–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar