Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T10:15:24.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Demountable Tube in Light Element Fluorescence Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

M. A. Short and
M. J. H. Ruscoe
M. A. Short
Affiliation:
Associated Electrical Industries, Limited Urmston, Manchester, England
M. J. H. Ruscoe
Affiliation:
Associated Electrical Industries, Limited Urmston, Manchester, England
Get access

Abstract

In view of the importance of obtaining optimum conditions for the X-ray fluorescence analysis of light elements, an investigation has been made of the effects of varying the X-ray tube target, the target take-off angle, the tube voltage, and the tube window thickness. The effects of these parameters have been observed by measurement of the intensity of fluorescence of two light elements using the Ray max 60 demountable tube and vacuum path spectrometer. The results obtained are compared with those given by theoretical calculations based on consideration of the relevant parameters; good qualitative agreement has been obtained. It is shown that a high primary X-ray intensity is obtained with a high target take-off angle, a low angle of incidence of the electron beam on the target, and an optimum setting of tube voltage. It is further shown that the most suitable target to use for the fluorescence analysis of light elements is markedly dependent on the thickness of the X-ray tube window.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 10: Fifteenth Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 10-12, 1966 , 1966, pp. 520 - 533
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Spielberg, N., “Tube Fluorescence ind Inherent Filtration as Factors in the Fluorescence Excitation of X-Rays,” J. Appl. Phys, 33: 2033, 1962.Google Scholar
2. Thatcher, J. W. and Campbell, W. J., “Instrumentation for Primary and Secondary Excitation of Low-Energy X-Ray Spectral Lines,” U.S. Bureau Mines, Report Invest. 6689, 1965.Google Scholar
3. Spielberg, N., “Intensities of Radiation from X-Ray Tubes and the Excitation of Fluorescence X-Rays,” Philips Res. Rept. 14: 215, 1959.Google Scholar
4. Bearden, J. A., “X-Ray Wavelengths,!” U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, NYO-10586, 1964.Google Scholar
5. Liebhafsky, H. A., Pfeiffer, H. G., Winslow, E. H., and Zemany, P. D., X-Ray Absorption and Emission in Analytical Chemistry, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1960, p. 307.Google Scholar
6. Heinrich, K. F. J., “X-Ray Absorptiojn Uncertainty,” in: T. D. McKinley, K. F. J. Heinrich, and D. B. Wittry (eds), The Electron Microprobe, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1966, p. 296.Google Scholar
7. Short, M. A., “Detection, and Correction of Nonlinearity in X-Ray Proportional Counters,” Rev. Sd.Instr. 31: 618, 1960.Google Scholar
8. Green, M. and Cosslett, V. E., “The Efficiency of Production of Characteristic X-Radiation in Thick Targets of a Pure Element,” Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 78: 1206, 1961.Google Scholar
9. Philibert, J., “A Method for Calculatikg the Absorption Correction in Electron Probe Microanalysis,” in: H. H. Pattee, V. E. Cosslett, and A. Engstrom (eds.), X-Ray Optics and X-Ray Microanalysis, Academic Press, New York, 1963, p. 379.Google Scholar
10. Duncumb, P. and Shields, P. K., “Effect of Critical Excitation Potential on the Absorption Correction in X-Ray Microanalysis, “I Tube Investments Research Laboratories Technical Report No. 181, 1964.Google Scholar
11. Bishop, H. E., private communication: from Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, 1966.Google Scholar
12. Burkhalter, P. G., “Measurements of Backscattered Electrons in an Electron Probe Microanalyser,” U.S. Bureau Mines, Report Invest. 6681, 1965.Google Scholar