Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-13T04:29:07.301Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Experimental Examination of Error Functions for Bragg-Brentano Powder Diffractometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

H.W. King and
E.A. Payzant
H.W. King
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Engineering, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, N6A 5B9, Canada
E.A. Payzant
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Engineering, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, N6A 5B9, Canada
Get access

Abstract

A single function for the elimination of errors in precision lattice parameter determination has not been developed for the Bragg-Brentano x-ray diffractometer method, because of the different angular dependencies of the systematic errors. A review of the error functions shows that all but one can be calculated from the instrumental settings and known properties of a sample under investigation. The residual sample displacement error can be then be eliminated by using extrapolation plots or computer methods to correct the data to cosθcotθ plots. The slopes of cosθcotθ plots can also be used to align high temperature furnaces and low temperature cryostats mounted on x-ray diffractometers.

Information

Type
X. XRD Techniques and Instrumentation
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 36: Forty-First Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 3-7, 1992 , 1992, pp. 663 - 670
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Vassamillet, L. F. and King, H. W., “Precision X-ray Diffractometry Using Powder Specimens”, Adv. X-ray Anal., 6 142–157(1963) .Google Scholar
2. Rachinger, W. A., “A Correction for the α1α2 Doublet in the Measurement of Widths of Xray Diffraction Lines”, J. Sci. Instrum., 25 254–255(1948).Google Scholar
3. Wilson, A.J. C., “Some Problems in the Definition of Wavelengths in X-ray Crystallography”, Z. Kristallogr. Ill 471-476(1959).Google Scholar
4. Pike, E. R., “Counter-tube Diftactometer - The Effect of Dispersion, Lorentz and Polarization Factors on the Position of X-ray Powder Diffraction Lines in Terms of the Center of Gravity of the Lines”, Acta Crystallogr., 12 87-92(1959) and 14 53–54(1961).Google Scholar
5. Ladell, J., Mack, M., Parrish, W. and Taylor, J., “Dispersion, Lorentz and Polarization Effects in the Centroid Method of Precision Lattice Parameter Determination”, Acta Crystallogr., 12 567–570(1959).Google Scholar
6. Parrish, W. and Kohler, R. T., “Use of Counter Tubes in X-ray Analysis”, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 27 795–808(1956).Google Scholar
7. Wilson, A. J. C., “Correction of Lattice Spacings for Refraction”, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc, 36 485–489(1940).Google Scholar
8. Wilson, A. J. C., “Effect of Absorption on the Mean Wavelength of X-ray Emission Lines”, Proc. Phys. Soc, (London), 72 924–925(1958).Google Scholar
9. Cermak, J., “The Intensity Distribution in the Faces of Curved Crystals Monochromators and an Estimate of its Influence or. Precision Measurements of Lattice Parameters”, Acta Crystallogr., 13 832–835(1960).Google Scholar
10. Beardon, J. A., “X-ray Wavelengths”, US Atomic Energy Commission, Division of Technical Information Extension, Oak Ridge TN, Publication NYO-10586(1964).Google Scholar
11. Bond, W. L., “Precision Lattice Constant Determination”, Acta Crystallogr., 13 814–817 (1960).Google Scholar
12. Pike, E. R., “Counter-tube Diffractometer - The Effect of Vertical Divergence on the Displacement and Breadth of X-ray Powder Diffraction Lines”, J. Sci. Instr., 34 355-363(1957) and 36 52–53(1959).Google Scholar
13. Wong-Ng, W. and Hubbard, C. R., “Standard Reference Materials for X-ray Diffracion Part II. Calibration using d-Spacing Standards”, Powder Diffraction, 2 242–248(1987).Google Scholar
14. Klug, H. P. and Alexander, L. F., “X-ray Diffraction Procedures”, 2nd Edn., Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY (1974) p.292.Google Scholar
15. Pike, E. R. and Wilson, A. J. C., “Counter-tube Diffractometer - The Theory of the Use of Centroids of Diffraction Profiles for High Accuracy in the Measurement of Diffraction Angles”, Brit. J. Appl. Phys., 10 57–68(1959).Google Scholar
16. Alexander, L. E., “The Synthesis of X-ray Spectrometer Line Profiles with Application to Crystallite Size Measurements” J. Appl. Phys., 25 155–161(1954),Google Scholar
17. Wilson, A. J. C., “Geiger-Counter X-ray Spectrometer - Influence of Size and Absorption Coefficient of Specimen on the Position and Shape of Powder Diffraction Maxima”, J. Sci lnstr., 27 321–325(1950).Google Scholar
18.Standard Reference Materials for X-ray Powder Diffractometry, Office of Standard Reference Materials, National Institute for Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899.Google Scholar
19. King, H. W. and Russell, C. M., “Double-Scanning Diffractometry in the Back-Reflection Region”, Adv. X-ray Anal., 8 1–10(1965).Google Scholar