No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Heterogeneity Effects in X-Ray Analysis*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 March 2019
Abstract
A fundamental quantitative treatment of the heterogeneity effects in X-ray fluorescence has been made. The theory predicts that the grain-size effect appears only in a limited region of grain sizes which depends on the wavelength of the primary radiation and the nature of the compounds in the mixture. With monochromatic radiation, the fluorescence intensity showed increase or decrease by a factor of a few units as grain size is decreased, A factor as large as 12, the theoretical value, has been observed in one particular experiment. Usually the grain-size effect can be eliminated by intensive grinding. For the light elements fine grinding is disastrous if long wavelengths are used. By an appropriate choice of the wavelength it is possible to eliminate the effect even without grinding. The mathematical treatment also predicts, but less rigorously, a grain-size effect in X-ray diffraction.
The effect on the fluorescence intensities by changes in the chemical composition of the grains that contain the fluorescent element is predicted by the theory.
These findings are discussed in relation to the analysis of elements when polychromatic beams are used.
Information
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1961
Footnotes
*
Associate professor, Mining and Metallurgy Department, Université Laval, Quebec, and chief physicist, Department of Natural Resources of the Province of Quebec.
*
Published by permission of the Deputy Minister of Natural Resources.
References
1.
Claisse, F., “Accurate X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis without Internal Standard,” Norelco Reporter, Vol. 3, 1957, p. 3; P. R. No. 327, Quebec Department of Mines.Google Scholar
3.
Campbell, W. J. and Thatcher, J. W., “Determination of Calcium in Wolframite Concentrates by X-Ray Spectrography,” Advances in X-Ray Analysis, Vol. 2, University of Denver, Plenum Press, New York, 1960, p. 313.Google Scholar
4.
Smithson, G. L., Eager, R. L., and Van Cleave, A. B., “Determination of Uranium in Flotation Concentrates and in Leach Liquors by X-Ray Fluorescence,” Advances in X-Ray Analysis, Vol. 2, University of Denver, Plenum Press, New York, 1960, p. 175.Google Scholar
5.
Chodos, A. A., Branco, J. J. R., and Engle, C. G., “Rock Analysis by X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy,” Advances in X-Ray Analysis, Vol. 1, University of Denver, New York, 1960, p. 315.Google Scholar
6.
Adler, I. and Axelrod, J. M., “Application of X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy to Analytical Problems,” Norelco Reporter, Vol. 3, 1956, p. 65.Google Scholar
7.
Mitchel, B. J., “X-Ray Spectroph olographic Determination of Tantalum, Niobium, Iron and Titanium Oxide Mixtures,” Anal. Chem., Vol. 30, 1958, p. 1894.Google Scholar
8.
Mortimore, D. M., Romans, P. A., and Tews, J. L., “X-Ray Spectroscopic Determination of Columbmm and Tantalum in Rare-Earths Ores,” Norelco Reporter, Vol. 1, 1954, p. 106.Google Scholar
9.
Campbell, J. W., Leon, M., and Thatcher, J. W., “Solution Techniques in Fluorescent X-Ray Spectrography,” U.S. Bureau of Mines, Report of Investigation -5497.Google Scholar
10
Zemany, P. D., “The Effects Due to Chemical State of the Samples in X-Ray Emission and Absorption,” Anal. Chem., Vol. 32, 1960, p. 595.Google Scholar
11
White, E. W., McKinstry, H. A., and Bates, T. F., “Crystal Chemical Studies by X-Ray Fluorescence,” Advances in X-Ray Analysis, Vol. 2, University of Denver, Plenum Press, New York, 1960, p. 239.Google Scholar
- 8
- Cited by