Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T11:59:05.344Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

High-Temperature Furnaces for X-Ray Diffractometers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

William J. Campbell
Affiliation:
Bureau of Mines, U.S. Department of the Interior, Metallurgy Research Center, College Park, Maryland
Stephan Stecura
Affiliation:
Bureau of Mines, U.S. Department of the Interior, Metallurgy Research Center, College Park, Maryland
Clark Grain
Affiliation:
Bureau of Mines, U.S. Department of the Interior, Metallurgy Research Center, College Park, Maryland
Get access

Abstract

This paper summarizes developments in the field of high-temperature X-ray diffractometers through 1959, evaluates various furnace designs, and describes briefly the X-ray diffraction facilities of the Federal Bureau of Mines.

X-ray optics, for those furnaces that have precision sample movements, are equivalent in resolution and line profile to conventional X-ray techniques. There is a 10-25% loss of intensity due to absorption of X-rays in the furnace windows, magnitude of which depends on wavelength and type of window used, and a reduction (5–40° 2θ) of useful angular range from limiting X-ray windows, radiation shielding, or the viewport for an optical pyrometer. In oxidizing atmospheres, temperatures up to 1500°C were obtained with furnaces wound with platinum—20% rhodium wire. Under nonoxidizing conditions temperatures of 1800 to 2000°C were obtained with both tantalum-foil and tungsten-wire heaters.

Accurate temperature measurement over the area and depth of samples being studied is the most difficult problem in high-temperature X-ray diffractometry. Below 500°C, there are several furnace designs which are reported to reduce thermal differentials to less than 1°C across the sample. However, at temperatures around 1000°C, there are thermal gradients of 20-30°C/cm across the sample and 100–600°C/cm through the sample holder, making thermocouple location critical. Secondary standards have been used extensively to calibrate the furnaces; however, there is disagreement concerning which are the most reliable data to use. For these reasons, plus others discussed in this report, there is a probable error in the temperature determination of ±10 to 20°C at 1000°C, with the error increasing with temperature.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable