Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T11:09:13.283Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Precise Determination of the Atomic Position Parameter for α-Uranium*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Edward F. Sturcken and
Ben Post
Edward F. Sturcken
Affiliation:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Aiken, South Carolina
Ben Post
Affiliation:
Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn, Brooklyn, New York
Get access

Abstract

The new value determined for the parameter was y= 0.1025 ± 0.0003 compared to a previous value of y= 0.105 ± 0.005 deduced by Jacob and Warren. The absorption errors and preferred orientation effects were eliminated and the statistical precision of the measurements was increased by employing a single-crystal diffractometrlc technique.

The cell dimensions were also refined by using the diffractometric technique for high-purity annealed polycrystalllne uranium. Cell dimensions were ao= 2.854 A, bo=5.869 A, and co=4.955 A, all ±0.002 A. Interatomic distances of the twelve nearest neighbors were two atoms at 2.754 and 2.854 A andfour atoms at 3,263 and 3,342 A. The bond lengths were only slightly affected by the changes in y. The main effects of the new parameter are to alter the component of the bond along the b direction by 0.015 A and to change appreciably the calculated relative diffraction intensities.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 4: Ninth Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 10-12, 1960 , 1960, pp. 85 - 92
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

The information contained in this article was developed during the course of work under contract AT(07-2)-1 with the U. S. Atomic Energy Commission.

References

1. Pugh, S. F., “Damage Occurring in Uranium During Burn-up,” Intern. Conf. Peaceful Uses Atomic Energy, Geneva, 1955, Vol. 7, 1956, pp. 441, 443.Google Scholar
2. Seigle, L. L. and Opinsky, A. J., “Mechanism of Dimensional Instability of Uranium,” Nuclear Sci. and Eng., Vol. 2, 1957, pp. 38–48.Google Scholar
3. Paine, S. H. and Kittel, J. H., Preliminary Analysis of Fission-Induced Dimensional Changes in Single Crystals of Uranium, Argonne National Laboratory, ANL-5676, October 1958.Google Scholar
4. Sturcken, E. F., An X-Ray Method for Predicting the Stability of Uranium at Low Burnup, E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, DP-251, November 1957 (Confidential).Google Scholar
5.Am. Inst. Mining Eng; Nuclear Metallurgy, Volume VI, A Symposium on Effects of Irradiation on Fuel and Fuel Elements, 1959.Google Scholar
6. Wilson, T. A., ‘Crystal Structure of Uranium,” Physics, Vol. 4, 1933, pp. 148–152,Google Scholar
7. Jacob, C. W. and Warren, B. E., “The Crystalline Structure of Uranium,” J. Am. Chem. Soc, Vol. 59, 1937, p. 2588.Google Scholar
8. Lukesh, J. S., “Note on the Structure of Uranium,” Acta Cryst., Vol. 2, 1949, p. 420.Google Scholar
9. Vand, V., Eiland, P. F., and Pepinsky, R., “Analytical Representation of Atomic Scattering Factors,” Acta Cryst., Vol. 10, 1957, p. 303.Google Scholar
10. Forsyth, J. B. and Wells, M., Acta Cryst., Vol. 12, 1959, p. 412.Google Scholar
11. Dauben, C. H. and Templeton, P. H., “A Table of Dispersion Corrections for X-Ray Scattering of Atoms,” Acta Cryst., Vol. 8, 1955, p. 841.Google Scholar
12. Gray, D. E. (editor), American Institute of physics Handbook, 1957, pp. 4–48, McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
13. Hess, J. B., “A Modification of the Cohen Procedure for Computing Precision Lattice Constants from Powder Data,” Acta Cryst., Vol. 4, 1951, p. 209.Google Scholar
14. Cohen, M. U., “Precision Lattice Constants from X-Ray Powder Photographs,” Rev. Sci. Instr., Vol. 6, 1935, p. 68, and Vol. 7, 1936, p. 155.Google Scholar
15. Vogel, R. E. and Kempter, C. P., A Mathematical Technique for the Precision Determination of Lattice Constants, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, LA-2317, September 1959.Google Scholar
16. Harris, G. B., “Quantitative Measurement of Preferred Orientation in Rolled Uranium Bars,” Phil Mag., Series 7, Vol. 43, 1952, p. 113.Google Scholar