Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-13T22:08:04.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Use of a CCD-Based Area Detection System on a Fibre Diffractometer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

S. Hanna and
A.H. Windle
S. Hanna
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy University of Cambridge Pembroke Street Cambridge, CB2 3QZ, U.K.
A.H. Windle
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy University of Cambridge Pembroke Street Cambridge, CB2 3QZ, U.K.
Get access

Abstract

We describe a new X-ray fibre diffractometer, consisting of a commercial X-ray sensitive video camera coupled to a conventional 3-circle goniometer in place of a more traditional single-point detector. The active element of the video camera is a charge-coupled device (CCD). Diffraction images, obtained at various goniometer settings, are transformed into reciprocal space, and combined to give a complete section through the origin and parallel to the symmetry axis of cyiindrically averaged reciprocal space. A greater density of measurements is needed in the vicinity of the reciprocal fibre axis in order to avoid information loss due to the curvature of the Ewald sphere. The pros and cons of using CCD's as X-ray detectors are discussed and sample results from polymer fibres are shown.

Information

Type
VI. Polymer Applications of X-Ray Scattering
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 38: Forty-third Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis , 1994, pp. 503 - 510
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

[1] Lovell, R. & Windle, A.H. (1976). Polymer 17, 488–494.Google Scholar
[2] Lovell, R. & Windle, A.H. (1977). Acta Cryst. A33, 390–395.Google Scholar
[3] Arndt, U.W. (1986). J. Appl. Ctyst. 19, 145–163.Google Scholar
[4] Arndt, U.W. (1990). Synchrotron Radiation News 3, 17–22.Google Scholar
[5] Elf, F., Will, G. & Weisgerber, S. (1991). Materials Science Forum 79-82, 371–376.Google Scholar
[6] Widom, J. & Feng, H.-P. (1989). Rev. Sci. Instmrn. 60, 3231–3238.Google Scholar
[7] Tomkins, P.R. (1988). Adv. Electron, and Electron Phys. 74, 27–33.Google Scholar
[8] Templer, R.H., Gruner, S.M. & Eikenberry, E.F. (1988). Adv. Electron, and Electron Phys. 74, 275–283.Google Scholar
[9] Van Geest, L.K. (1988). Adv. Electron, and Electron Phys. 74, 1–8.Google Scholar
[10] Eikenberry, E.F., Gruner, S.M. & Lowrance, J.L. (1986). IEEE Trans. Nud. Sci. 83, 542–545.Google Scholar
[11] Arndt, U.W., Ostrowski, D.J. & Stubbings, S.J. (1990). Mem. Sci, Technol. 1, 456–457.Google Scholar
[12] Thomas, D.T. (1989). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A425, 129–167.Google Scholar
[13] Alexander, L.E. (1969). X-ray Diffraction Methods in Polymer Science , pp. 39-42, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
[14] Hanna, S. & Windle, A.H. (1994). J. Appl. Cryst. Accepted, November 1994.Google Scholar
[15] Keates, P., Mitchell, G.R., Peuvrel-Disdter, E. & Navard, P. (1993). Polymer 34, 1316–1319.Google Scholar
[16] Mahendrasingham, A., Hughes, D., Martin, C., Jaber, A. & Fuller, W. (1994). Paper presented at the 3rd. Annual CCP13/NCD Meeting, Daresbury Laboratory, U.K., 9th.-11th, May, 1994.Google Scholar
[17] Moy, J.P. (1993). ESRF Newsletter No. 18, pp. 8–9.Google Scholar