Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-g96k6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T13:38:39.550Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

X-Ray Imaging: Status and Trends

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

R.W. Ryon ,
H.E. Martz ,
J.M. Hernandez ,
J.J. Haskins ,
R.A. Day ,
J.M. Brase ,
Brian Cross  and
David Wherry
R.W. Ryon
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore, California 94550
H.E. Martz
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore, California 94550
J.M. Hernandez
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore, California 94550
J.J. Haskins
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore, California 94550
R.A. Day
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore, California 94550
J.M. Brase
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore, California 94550
Brian Cross
Affiliation:
Kevex, Inc. Foster City, California 94404
David Wherry
Affiliation:
Kevex, Inc. Foster City, California 94404
Get access

Extract

There is a veritable renaissance occurring in x-ray imaging. X-ray imaging by radiography has been a highly developed technology in medicine and industry for many years. However, high resolution imaging has not generally been practical because sources have been relatively dim and diffuse, optical elements have been nonexistant for most applications, and detectors have been slow and of low resolution. Materials analysis needs have therefore gone unmet. Rapid progress is now taking place because we are able to exploit developments in microelectronics and related material fabrication techniques, and because of the availability of intense x-ray sources.

Information

Type
I. Microbeam Techniques and Imaging Methods for Materials Characterization
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 31: Thirty-Sixth Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 3-7, 1987 , 1987 , pp. 35 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Knight, Larry V., “X-ray Imaging”, Advanced Imaging, May, 1987 (A 19-26).Google Scholar
2. Cunningham, T.G. et al., “The Application of X-Ray Microscopy in Materials Science”, Journal of Microscopy, Vol. 144(3), 1986, pp. 261–275.Google Scholar
3. Duke, P.J., “Synchrotron Radiation Applied to the Microsopical Examination of Solid State and Biological Materials in the X-ray Region”, Journal of Microscopy, Vol. 138 (3) 1985, pp. 285–292.Google Scholar
4. Spiller, Eberhard and Feder, Ralph, “The Optics of Long Wavelength X-Rays”, Scientific American, Nov, 1978, pp. 70–8.Google Scholar
5. Underwood, James H. and Barbee, Troy W. Jr., “Soft X-ray imaging with a normal incidence mirror”, Nature, Vol. 294, 3 Dec 1981, pp 429–431.Google Scholar
6. Thompson, A.C., Wu, Y., and Underwood, J.H., and Barbee, T.W. Jr., “Focussing of Synchrotron Radiation X-ray Beams Using Synthetic Multilayer Mirrors”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A255 (1987), pp 603–605.Google Scholar
7. Niemann, B., Schmahl, G., et al. “X-ray microscopy with Synchrotron Radiation at the Electron Storage Ring BESSY in Berlin”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A246 (1986), pp 675–680.Google Scholar
8. Nichols, Monte C. and Ryon, Richard W., “An X-Ray Microfluorescence System with Diffraction Capabilities”, Advances in X-Ray Analysis, Vol. 29, pp 423–426.Google Scholar
9. Nichols, Monte C., Boehme, Dale, et al., “Parameters Affecting X-Ray Microfluorescence Analysis”, Advances in X-Ray Analysis Vol. 30 - in pressGoogle Scholar
10. Gurker, N., “X-ray Mapping using a New Coded Irradiation Technique”, X-Ray Spectrometry, Vol 14(2), 1985 pp 74–83.Google Scholar
11. Aman, John, “automating the NDT Process”, NDT Today, Winter 1987, Dupont, E.I. de Nemours and CompanyGoogle Scholar
12. Bonse, U. et al., “High Resolution Tomography with Chemical Specificity”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A246 (1986) pp. 644–648.Google Scholar
13. Bigler, E., et al. “Quantiative Mapping of Atomic Species by X-ray Absorption Edge Microradiography”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods 208 (1983) pp 387–392.Google Scholar
14. Cheng, P.C., Feder, R., et al., “Soft X-Ray Contact Microscopy”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A246 (1986) pp 668–674).Google Scholar
15. Davies, R.L., Flores, N.A., and Pye, J.K., “Developments in contact x-ray microscopy in biomedical research”, Journal of Microscopy, Vol. 138, pt,3, June 1985, pp. 293300.Google Scholar
16. Kinney, J.H., Johnson, Q.C., et al. “The Performance of CCD Array Detectors for Application in High Resolution Tomography”, SPIE Proceedings Vol. 691, X-Ray Imaging (1986), pp43–49.Google Scholar
17. Luppino, Gerard A. and Ceglio, Natale M., “X-Ray CCD Cameras II”, SPIE Proceedings, Vol. 688, Multilayer Structures and Laboratory X-Ray Laser Research (1986).Google Scholar
18. Amemiya, Yoshiyuki, Wakabayashi, Katsuzo, et al., “Laser-Stimulated Luminescence Used to Measure X-ray Diffraction of a Contracting Striated Muscle”, Science, Vol. 237 (lOJuly 1987) pp. 164–168.Google Scholar
19. Matsubara, I., et al. “Intensification of the 5.9 nm Actin Layer Line in Contracting Muscle”, Nature, Vol. 312 (29 Nov 1984) pp 471–473.Google Scholar
20. Brase, James Hernandez, Jose, Martz, Harty, and Wieting, Melvin, “Quantitative Film Analysis”, UCRL preprint, July 1987.Google Scholar
21. Pella, P.A., Feng, Liangyuan, and Small, J.A., “Spectral Distributions of X-Ray Tubes for Quantitative X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis”, X-Ray Spectrometry, Vol. 14 (3), 1985, pp. 125–135.Google Scholar
22. Tao, G.Y., Pella, P.A. and Rousseau, R.M., “NBSCGS - A Fortran Program for Quantitative X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis”, U.S. National Bureau of Standards Technical Note 1213.Google Scholar
23. Brown, D.B., Criss, J.W., and Birks, L.S., “Sensitvity of x-ray films. 1. A model for sensitvity in the 1-100 keV region”, Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 47(8), 1076, pp. 3722–3739.Google Scholar
24. Stoering, J.F. and Toor, A., “X-Ray Calibration of Kodak No-Screen, Type AAf and Type M in the 1-4.5 keV Region”, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Report UCID-16775.Google Scholar
25. Kak, A.C., “Computed Tomography with X-ray, Emission, and Ultrasound Sources”, Proceedings IEEE Vol. 67(9), 1979.Google Scholar
26. Herman, G.T., Image Reconstruction from Projection. Academic Press, New York, 1980.Google Scholar
27. Hofmeister, E.L. and Cueman, M.K., General Electric Company, “Industrial Computed Tomography”, presented at the 7th Advanced Materials Workshop, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratoiy, April, 1987.Google Scholar
28. Flannery, Brian P., Deckman, Harry W., Roberge, Wayne G., and D'Amico, Kevin A., Corporate Reasearch, Exxon Research and Engineering Company, Annandale, N.J. 08801, preprint 1987.Google Scholar
29. Hutchins, and Tam, A., “Pulsed Photoacoustic Materials Characterization”, Trans, of Ultrasonic, Ferr. and Freq, Control, Vol. UFFC-33, No. 5, September 1986Google Scholar
30. Kim, K. and Sachse, W., “X-ray generated Ultrasound”, Appl. Phys. Lett., 43 (12), 15 December 1983.Google Scholar
31. Sachse, W. and Kim, K., “Observation of X-ray Generated Ultrasound”, Proceedings of the IEEE 1983 Ultrasonics Symposium, pp. 677–68.Google Scholar
32. Sachse, W. and Kim, K.,” X-ray Photoacoustics”, Proceedings of the IEEE 1986 Ultrasonics Symposium, pp. 495–500.Google Scholar